announcements august 25, 2006 if you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
AnnouncementsAugust 25, 2006
If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”
![Page 2: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
BBCTuesday, 22 August 2006
Climate linked to plague increase
Up to 3,000 cases of plague are reported each year. Climatic changes could lead to more outbreaks of bubonic plague among human populations, a study suggests.
Researchers found that the bacterium that caused the deadly disease became more widespread following warmer springs and wetter summers.
![Page 3: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Aug 21, 2006Trap-jaw ant has world's fastest bite The mandibles of the trap-jaw ant close at speeds up to 145 mph, the fastest predatory strike in the animal kingdom.
Scientists have discovered the fastest bite in the world, one so explosive it can be used to send the ant that performs it flying through the air to escape predators. These powerful jaws could serve as inspirations for the propulsion systems of miniature robots, says researcher Andrew Suarez, an ecologist and entomologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://webfiles.berkeley.edu/xythoswfs/webui/_xy-462276_1-t_QmzyUzyF
![Page 4: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Basic Scientific Principles
Lecture Objectives:
2. Discuss how to form and test hypotheses.
1. Outline the scientific method.
3. Learn the differences between a scientific theory, law and hypothesis.
4. Understand the limitations of science.
![Page 5: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Scientific Thinking
Science — A process used to solve problems or develop an understanding of nature that involves testing possible answers.
Scientific Method — Gaining information about the world by forming possible solutions to questions, followed by rigorous testing to determine if the proposed solutions are valid.
![Page 6: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Scientific Method Presumptions
Specific causes for observed events.
Causes can be identified.
General rules can describe observations.Repeated events have same cause.
Perceptions are not individualistic.
Fundamental rules of nature are universal.
Leads to world domination (only for evil scientists).
![Page 8: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Scientific Method
![Page 9: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Scientific Method
Question — Usually a “how” or “why” question about the cause of the event.
Observation — recording of an event that could be made by anyone with the proper equipment.
![Page 10: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Scientific Method
be testable and falsifiable
Hypothesis — Logical statement that potentially explains an event, or answers a question.
A good hypothesis will:
take into account all known facts
be as simple as possible
![Page 11: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Test Hypothesis
1. Devise an experiment.
2. Predict the outcome of the experiment if the hypothesis is correct.
Types of experiments:
- Thought experiment
- Observational experiment
- Manipulative experiment
Scientific Method
![Page 12: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Manipulative experiment — experimental factors are varied to test hypothesis.
Control – Separate variables and divide experiment into experimental and control groups. There should be only one difference between the experimental and control groups.
Important features of manipulative experiments:
Replication — Experiment is repeated to eliminate unconscious bias or a spurious correlation.
Scientific Method
![Page 13: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Conclusion — statement if the hypothesis has been supported or not by the results of the test.
Scientific Method
Hypotheses are never “proven” true!!
If results match predictions, then hypothesis supported.
If results to not match predictions, then hypothesis not supported.
![Page 14: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Statistics
A branch of applied mathematics concerned with the collection and interpretation of quantitative data.
Probability
How likely are your results true?
![Page 15: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Our ability to accept or reject a hypothesis will be based on the accuracy and precision of our measurements.
Accuracy - an estimate of nearness to the truth or the true value
Precision - the repeatability of reproducibility of a measurement
![Page 16: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Observation: The light in your room does not come on when you flip the switch
Question: Why didn’t the light come on?
![Page 17: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Question: Why didn’t the light come on?
Hypotheses:
1. The light bulb burned out.
2. The lamp is not plugged in.
3. The electrical outlet is not working.
4. The circuit breaker was tripped.
5. The lamp is broken.
![Page 18: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Tests & Predications:
1. If I replace the bulb, the light will come on.
2. If I make sure the lamp is plugged in, ...
3. If I plug the lamp into another outlet, …
4. If I replace the fuse/flip the circuit breaker…
5. ??? No single test - If I do all of the above, the light still will not work.
![Page 19: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Light bulb?
Plug? Outlet? Circuit breaker?
Lamp?
Change bulb
Y N N N N
Check plug
N Y N N N
Plug in other
N N Y N N
Check breaker
N N N Y N
If ____ hypothesis is correct, and I do ____ test, will the light come on?
Important to do only one thing at a time!!
![Page 20: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results:
1. The light does not come on after replacing the bulb.
2. The lamp was plugged in.
3. The lamp does not come on when plugged into another outlet.
4. The light does not come on after flipping the circuit breaker.
![Page 21: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conclusions:
The lamp is probably broken.
Why say probably?
![Page 22: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Scientific Method
Observation — Amphibian deformities are increasing world-wide
Deformities in Pennsylvania
wood frogs
http://www.science.psu.edu/alert/Kiesecker7-2002.htm#photos
Deformed American toads
Rana sylvatica
Kiesecker, J. M. 2002. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:9900-9904
![Page 23: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Hypothesis 1: The deformities are caused by a naturally occurring parasite (a disease)
Prior research suggests three main hypotheses:
Hypothesis 2: The deformities are caused by a chemical contaminant in the environment
Hypothesis 3: Chemicals and parasites in combination increase the chance that a deformity will result
![Page 24: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Types of Experiments:
Laboratory Field
Pro: Highly controlled
Con: Limited reality
Pro: Highly realistic
Con: Many uncontrolled factors
![Page 25: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Trematode cercariae, the infective stage that would attack frogs
Do parasites cause limb deformities in frogs?
![Page 26: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Hypothesis 1: The deformities are caused by the parasite
Experiment 1:
Field experiment
6 natural ponds
6 cages per pond
![Page 27: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
6 cages per pond
In each pond:3 cages allowed the parasite in (exposed)3 cages kept the parasite out (protected/unexposed)
REPLICATION!!!
![Page 28: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Percentage of deformities in adult frogs:
Conclusion: Exposure to parasites leads to deformities (Hypothesis 1 supported)
Pond Exposed Protected1 23% 0%2 34% 0%3 27% 0%4 3% 0%5 7% 0%6 4% 0%
Prediction: If parasites cause deformities, then tadpoles exposed to parasites will be deformed, but those protected will not.
![Page 29: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
But, what about chemicals?
![Page 30: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Hypothesis 2: The deformities are caused by chemicals
Same field experiment as before:
Ponds 1-3
Ponds 4-6
High agricultural runoffAtrazineMalathion
Low agricultural runoff
No Atrazine or Malathion detected
![Page 31: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Prediction: If deformities caused by chemical exposure, then tadpoles in ponds 1-3 will have deformaties, regardless of parasite exposure.
Percentage of deformities in adult frogs:Pond Exposed Protected1 23% 0%2 34% 0%3 27% 0%4 3% 0%5 7% 0%6 4% 0%
Conclusion: Chemical exposure alone does not seem to cause deformities. (Hypothesis 2 not supported)
Chemicals
No Chemicals
![Page 32: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Hypothesis 3: Chemicals and parasites in combination increase the chance that a deformity will result.
Prediction: Tadpoles exposed to parasites in ponds 1-3 (chemicals) will develop more deformities than tadpoles exposed to parasites in ponds 4-6 (no chemicals).
![Page 33: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Percentage of deformities in adult frogs:Pond Exposed Protected1 23% 0%2 34% 0%3 27% 0%4 3% 0%5 7% 0%6 4% 0%
Conclusion: The combination of parasites and chemicals increases the development of deformities (Hypothesis 3 supported)
Chemicals
No Chemicals
WHY?
![Page 34: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Why do pesticide chemicals increase occurrence of developmental deformities when tadpoles exposed to parasites?
Hypothesis: chemicals weaken the immune system and the tadpole’s ability to fight off infection.
![Page 35: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Laboratory experiment:
Atrazine(weed control on crops)
Malathion(mosquitoes and insect control on crops)
Esfenvalerate(insect control on crops)
Control(no chemicals)
Exp
ose
to p
aras
ites
Mea
sure
Infe
ctio
n an
d im
mun
e sy
stem
res
pons
e
![Page 36: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Prediction: if chemicals weaken immune system, tadpoles exposed to chemicals will have higher infection levels and a lower immune response than tadpoles not exposed to chemicals.
Results: for all 3 chemical treatments, tadpoles had higher levels of infection and lower numbers of leukocytes in blood.
Conclusions: Agricultural chemicals weaken the immune system of frogs, making them more susceptible to infection by parasites, which cause limb deformities.
![Page 37: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Conclusions from the study:
1. Exposure to parasite infection was required for the development of limb deformities in these frogs
2. Deformities were more common in ponds with chemicals than in those without
3. Exposure to the chemicals weakens the tadpole immune system and increases the rate of infection
![Page 38: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Scientific Method
![Page 39: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Development of Theories and Laws
Theory — A widely accepted, plausible generalization about fundamental scientific concepts that explain why things happen.
Law — A uniform or constant fact of nature that describes what happens in nature.
Hypothesis — Logical statement that potentially explains an event, or answers a question.
![Page 40: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Limitations of Science
- Restricted to those things that can be logically tested and falsified.
- More than one hypothesis can predict the same outcome of a test.
- Results can be interpreted in different ways, leading to different conclusions.
- Hypotheses constantly being reevaluated and modified as more results and information are gained.
![Page 41: Announcements August 25, 2006 If you have not done so already, please hand in a “pre-test”](https://reader038.vdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022110210/56649e755503460f94b7675f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Points to know:
1. What is “science” and what presumptions does it have?
2. Know the steps in the Scientific method.
3. What are features of a good hypothesis and a controlled manipulative experiment?
4. Why are hypotheses never proven true? What terminology is used?
5. Be able to make a conclusion based on comparing experimental and control groups.
6. Distinguish between a scientific theory, law and hypothesis.
7. What are the limitations of science?