Annexure – II

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth. N. Sangma

Teaching: Core Papers II (Educational Psychology and Statistics)

Paper IV (Educational Technology and Management)

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the

day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:

Qs

Dr. (Mrs.) R. N. Sangma (87)

A % B % C % D %

1 64 73.56 18 20.69 5 5.75 0.00

2 46 52.87 36 41.38 5 5.75 0.00

3 66 75.86 15 17.24 6 6.90 0.00

4 54 62.07 24 27.59 9 10.34 0.00

5 48 55.17 31 35.63 8 9.20 0.00

6 56 64.37 23 26.44 8 9.20 0.00

7 40 45.98 30 34.48 17 19.54 0.00

8 51 58.62 26 29.89 10 11.49 0.00

9 58 66.67 24 27.59 5 5.75 0.00

10 58 66.67 24 27.59 5 5.75 0.00

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory

66.67

27.59

5.75 0.00

Dr. (Mrs.) Ruth N. Sangma

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Ms. Dianghun Shullai

Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Khasi

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken

Khasi as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:

Qs

Ms. D. Shullai (33)

A % B % C % D %

1 24 72.73 8 24.24 1 3.03 0.00

2 20 60.61 12 36.36 1 3.03 0.00

3 20 60.61 10 30.30 3 9.09 0.00

4 22 66.67 9 27.27 2 6.06 0.00

5 19 57.58 12 36.36 2 6.06 0.00

6 17 51.52 11 33.33 5 15.15 0.00

7 16 48.48 14 42.42 3 9.09 0.00

8 16 48.48 11 33.33 6 18.18 0.00

9 23 69.70 9 27.27 1 3.03 0.00

10 23 69.70 8 24.24 2 6.06 0.00

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory

69.70

24.24

6.06 0.00

Ms. Dianghun Shullai

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Ms. Darihun Kharnongrum

Teaching: Core Paper IV (Educational Technology and Management)

Elective Paper VII (Career Guidance and Counselling )

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the

day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:

Qs

Ms. D. Kharnongrum (92)

A % B % C % D %

1 56 60.87 28 30.43 8 8.70 0.00

2 46 50.00 38 41.30 8 8.70 0.00

3 47 51.09 29 31.52 12 13.04 4 4.35

4 39 42.39 32 34.78 18 19.57 3 3.26

5 39 42.39 39 42.39 11 11.96 3 3.26

6 42 45.65 29 31.52 15 16.30 6 6.52

7 38 41.30 33 35.87 15 16.30 6 6.52

8 37 40.22 30 32.61 20 21.74 5 5.43

9 42 45.65 32 34.78 18 19.57 0.00

10 39 42.39 35 38.04 15 16.30 3 3.26

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory

42.39 38.04

16.30

3.26

Ms. D. Kharnongrum

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Mrs. Calmy. R. Kharlukhi

Teaching: Elective Paper VII (Environmental Education) and Methodology of Teaching of Physical

Science and Life Science

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the

day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:

Qs

Mrs. C. Kharlukhi (90)

A % B % C % D %

1 66 73.33 22 24.44 2 2.22 0.00

2 62 68.89 20 22.22 8 8.89 0.00

3 57 63.33 26 28.89 7 7.78 0.00

4 51 56.67 32 35.56 7 7.78 0.00

5 49 54.44 35 38.89 5 5.56 1 1.11

6 49 54.44 30 33.33 10 11.11 1 1.11

7 41 45.56 30 33.33 18 20.00 1 1.11

8 47 52.22 28 31.11 15 16.67 0.00

9 61 67.78 23 25.56 6 6.67 0.00

10 53 58.89 32 35.56 5 5.56 0.00

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory

58.89

35.56

5.56 0.00

Mrs. Calmy Kharlukhi

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Ms. Alfa Mary Kurbah

Teaching: Core Paper III - Development of Educational System in India

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the

day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:

Qs

Ms. A. Kurbah (90)

A % B % C % D %

1 81 90.00 9 10.00 0.00 0.00

2 72 80.00 17 18.89 1 1.11 0.00

3 79 87.78 11 12.22 0.00 0.00

4 74 82.22 14 15.56 2 2.22 0.00

5 65 72.22 20 22.22 5 5.56 0.00

6 59 65.56 27 30.00 4 4.44 0.00

7 61 67.78 25 27.78 4 4.44 0.00

8 59 65.56 30 33.33 1 1.11 0.00

9 70 77.78 17 18.89 3 3.33 0.00

10 73 81.11 15 16.67 2 2.22 0.00

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory

81.11

16.67

2.22 0.00

Ms. Alfa Mary Kurbah

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Mrs. Inrilin Marwein

Teaching: Core Papers II (Educational Psychology and Statistics), Elective Paper VII (Computer) and

Methodology of Teaching of History and Social Studies

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by all the students present on the

day when the feedback was collected as core papers are compulsory for all students:

Qs

Mrs. I. Marwein (91)

A % B % C % D %

1 63 69.23 22 24.18 6 6.59 0.00

2 60 65.93 23 25.27 7 7.69 0.00

3 41 45.05 41 45.05 8 8.79 1 1.10

4 55 60.44 32 35.16 4 4.40 0.00

5 41 45.05 41 45.05 8 8.79 1 1.10

6 33 36.26 42 46.15 15 16.48 1 1.10

7 22 24.18 48 52.75 21 23.08 0.00

8 34 37.36 35 38.46 20 21.98 2 2.20

9 52 57.14 31 34.07 7 7.69 1 1.10

10 41 45.05 39 42.86 10 10.99 1 1.10

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory

45.05 42.86

10.99

1.10

Mrs. Inrilin Marwein

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Dr. (Mrs.) Sutapa Sengupta

Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Geography (Part-Time)

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken

Geography as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:

Qs

Dr. (Mrs.) S. Sengupta (7)

A % B % C % D %

1 5 71.43 2 28.57 0.00 0.00

2 2 28.57 4 57.14 1 14.29 0.00

3 1 14.29 3 42.86 3 42.86 0.00

4 1 14.29 2 28.57 4 57.14 0.00

5 1 14.29 6 85.71 0.00 0.00

6 0.00 2 28.57 3 42.86 2 28.57

7 1 14.29 3 42.86 2 28.57 1 14.29

8 2 28.57 4 57.14 0.00 1 14.29

9 2 28.57 5 71.43 0.00 0.00

10 1 14.29 6 85.71 0.00 0.00

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Not satisfactory

14.29

85.71

0.00 0.00

Dr. (Mrs.) Sutapa Sengupta

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Dr. (Ms.) Jaya. G. Choudhury

Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of Mathematics (Part-Time)

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken

Mathematics as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:

Qs

Dr. (Ms) J. Choudhury (4)

A % B % C % D %

1 4 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2 3 75.00 1 25.00 0.00 0.00

3 3 75.00 1 25.00 0.00 0.00

4 2 50.00 1 25.00 1 25.00 0.00

5 1 25.00 3 75.00 0.00 0.00

6 1 25.00 1 25.00 2 50.00 0.00

7 2 50.00 2 50.00 0.00 0.00

8 1 25.00 3 75.00 0.00 0.00

9 1 25.00 2 50.00 1 25.00 0.00

10 1 25.00 3 75.00 0.00 0.00

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory

25.00

75.00

0.00 0.00

Dr. (Ms.) Jaya G. Choudhury

STUDENT FEEDBACK 2013

Mrs. Sharmistha Purkayastha

Teaching: Methodology of Teaching of English (Part-Time)

The following table gives a clear picture of item-wise feedback given by the students who had taken

English as one of the Teaching Methodology Papers:

Qs

Mrs. S. Purkayastha (15)

A % B % C % D %

1 11 73.33 3 20.00 1 6.67 0.00

2 13 86.67 0.00 2 13.33 0.00

3 11 73.33 3 20.00 0.00 1 6.67

4 7 46.67 7 46.67 0.00 1 6.67

5 8 53.33 4 26.67 3 20.00 0.00

6 7 46.67 3 20.00 4 26.67 1 6.67

7 5 33.33 8 53.33 1 6.67 1 6.67

8 7 46.67 6 40.00 1 6.67 1 6.67

9 9 60.00 2 13.33 3 20.00 1 6.67

10 9 60.00 5 33.33 0.00 1 6.67

The following graphical presentation gives the overall feedback given by the students:

Excellent Good Satisfactory Notsatisfactory

60.00

33.33

0.00

6.67

Mrs. Sharmistha Purkayastha

Feedback from the Alumni:

Through meetings held with the Alumni, they realised that the course conducted by the college has

brought tremendous change in the field of teaching profession for their career. They appreciated the

dedication and hard work of the teachers and the management as a whole. They realised that the

training programme has equipped them well to face classroom challenges. Their sense of appreciation

is identified with their readiness to organise and participate in different activities of the college both

scholastic and co-scholastic.

The testimonies of appreciation can be understood from their expression: “I have learned from SMCTE

that teaching is not a mere job but true vocation”. “I have learned to improve my teaching skill in

SMCTE”. “SMCTE taught me to teach effectively”. “SMCTE has taught me to unearth the hidden

capabilities within myself”. “SMCTE has prepared me to face the modern students with the help of

technology”.

Feedback from Parents:

Through parents meeting, the college could gather a sense of appreciation for the college in promoting

quality education, and the efforts made to cater to the needs and interests of each and every individual

student.

Feedback from Employers:

The employers of the college highly appreciated the services rendered by the teaching and non-

teaching staff. Their dedication to their work is unquestionable.