annex r passport template
TRANSCRIPT
ANNEX R – PASSPORT TEMPLATE
CONTENTS
A. Project title
B. Project description
C. Proof of project eligibility
D. Unique Project Identification
E. Outcome stakeholder consultation process
F. Outcome sustainability assessment
G. Sustainability monitoring plan
H. Additionality and conservativeness deviations
Annex 1 ODA declarations
SECTION A. Project Title
Title: Enercon Wind Farm (Hindustan) Ltd in Karnataka
Date: 16 Feb 2015
Version no.: 1.2
SECTION B. Project description
The project activity is installation of 68.8 MW wind power project (“Project”) by Enercon Wind Farm (Hindustan) Ltd. in Karnataka state of India. The Project harnesses renewable resources in the region, and thereby displacing non‐renewable natural resources thereby ultimately leading to sustainable economic and environmental development. Enercon (India) Ltd (“Enercon”) is the equipment supplier and the operations and maintenance contractor for the Project. The generated electricity will be supplied to Karnataka Power Transmission Company Ltd (“KPTCL”)/ Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd (“BESCOM”) under a long‐term power purchase agreement (PPA).
The project activity consists of 86 WEGs of Enercon make E‐48 and each machine capacity is of 800 kW (E‐48) totalling to the capacity of 68.8 MW. The WEGs generate 3‐phase power at 400V, which is stepped up to 33 kV and connected to 33kV metering points. From 33 kV metering point electricity transmitted to Enercon Sub‐station. At sub‐station electricity is stepped‐up to 220 kV. From Enercon substation, electricity is further evacuated to the state electricity grid at 220kV. The Project can operate in the frequency range of 47.5–51.5 Hz and in the voltage range of 400 V ± 12.5%.
The first machine under the project activity was commissioned on 29 September 2006 and last machine under the project activity was commissioned on 28 December 2006. The expected operational lifetime of the project is for 20 years. Some of the project site pictures are shown below:‐
Project start date: The first machine under the project activity was commissioned on 29 September 2006 and last machine under the project activity was commissioned on 28 December 2006. The expected operational lifetime of the project is for 20 years. The length of the Crediting period of the project activity as per registered PDD is 10 years (Fixed) from 27 Oct 2008 to 26 Oct 2018.
Contribution to sustainable development: The Project fulfills several sustainable development objectives including:
contribution towards the policy desire of Government of India and Government of Karnataka of incremental
capacity from renewable sources;
contribution towards meeting the electricity deficit in Karnataka;
CO2 abatement and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through development of renewable technology;
reducing the average emission intensity (SOx, NOx, PM, etc.), average effluent intensity and average solid waste intensity of power generation in the system;
conserving natural resources including land, forests, minerals, water and ecosystems; and
developing the local economy and creating jobs and employment, particularly in rural areas, which is a priority concern for the Government of India;
SECTION C. Proof of project eligibility
C.1. Scale of the Project
Please tick where applicable:
Project Type Large Small
C.2. Host Country
India
C.3. Project Type
Please tick where applicable:
Project type Yes No
Does your project activity classify as a Renewable Energy project?
Does your project activity classify as an End‐use Energy Efficiency Improvement project?
Does your project activity classify as waste handling and disposal project?
Please justify the eligibility of your project activity:
As per para III of Gold Standard Requirements version 2.2 following are Project Eligibility Criteria:‐
General eligibility requirements : Project activity meets several sustainable development objectives including:
contribution towards the policy desire of Government of India and Government of Karnataka of incremental capacity from renewable sources;
contribution towards meeting the electricity deficit in Karnataka;
CO2 abatement and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through development of renewable technology;
reducing the average emission intensity (SOx, NOx, PM, etc.), average effluent intensity and average solidwaste intensity of power generation in the system;
conserving natural resources including land, forests, minerals, water and ecosystems; and
developing the local economy and creating jobs and employment, particularly in rural areas, which is a priority concern for the Government of India;
The project activity replaces anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG’s) into the atmosphere, which is estimated to be approximately 148,858 tCO2e per year, by displacing the equivalent amount of electricity generation through the operation of existing fuel mix in the grid comprising mainly fossil fuel based power plants and future capacity expansions connected to the grid.
Further project activity is additional (please refer section B.5 of registered PDD).
Eligible project location: Project activity located at Chikkabyaladakere, Kanubehalli, Elladakere and Arasinagundi villages in Chitradurga District and Dasudi, Nelenuru, Ganadu, Annenhalli, Siddapura villages in Tumkur district of Karnataka state in India (non‐Annex I country). Eligible project gases: The baseline study of Southern grid shows that the main sources of GHG emissions in the baseline are CO2 emissions from the conventional power generating systems, the other emissions are that of CH4 and N2O but both emissions were conservative and are excluded for simplification of the project. The project activity is the emission free electricity generation from renewable sources and hence emits no gases in the atmosphere. Project activity displaces CO2 from environment. Eligible project type: Project activity supply electricity to southern grid using wind as a source of power generation. Hence project activity falls under the Renewable Energy Supply type of project. Eligible project scale: The project activity is considered under CDM category zero‐emissions ‘grid‐connected electricity generation from renewable sources’ that generates electricity in excess of 15 MW (limit for small scale project). Hence project activity is a large scale project. Eligible methodologies for project activities: project activity uses UNFCCC approved consolidated baseline and
monitoring methodology ACM0002 Version 6.0 (19 May 2006). Please refer UNFCCC registered PDD. Official Development Assistance (ODA) funding: There is no public funding from Annex I countries and no diversion of Official Development Assistance (ODA) is involved in the project activity. Project activity is financed through debt & equity in a ratio of 70:30.
Pre Announcement Yes No
Was your project previously announced?
No announcement has been made previously of the project going ahead without the revenues from carbon credits. From the beginning of the project development, revenues from CDM have been considered as a crucial factor for the Project Owner to make investment decision. The Project Owner also organized stakeholder’s consultation meeting to engage with the local community and invite public comments on the development of the project as a CDM project. Furthermore, notification letters of the project developing under CDM were also submitted to relevant regulatory bodies (NCDMA and UNFCCC) for support of the project.
C.4. Greenhouse gas
Greenhouse Gas
Carbon dioxide
Methane
Nitrous oxide
C.5. Project Registration Type
Project Registration Type
Regular
Pre‐feasibility assessment
Retroactive projects
(T.2.5.1)
Preliminary evaluation (eg: Large Hydro or palm oil‐related project) (T.2.5.2)
Rejected by UNFCCC
(T2.5.3)
If Retroactive, please indicate Start Date of project activity dd/mm/yyyy: 10/03/2006
The purchase order placed for the project activity has been considered as the start date in line with Clean Development Mechanism Validation and Verification Standard, Version 03.0, where the start date of the project activity is the earliest date at which either the implementation or construction or real action of a project activity begins
SECTION D. Unique project identification
D.1. GPS‐coordinates of project location
The location details WECs of project activity are given in below table including site name, district, latitude‐ longitude details etc.
Coordinates
Latitude 13° 43' 20.9" N
Longitude 76° 31' 03.9" E
Explain given coordinates
Project activity is located in Karnataka state of India. The turbines are uniquely identified as EWHPL‐01 to EWHPL‐86. The details of the physical location of individual locations are as follows:
S.No.
WEG Unique Identification
Number
Location No.
Latitude (N) Longitude (E)
Deg. (°) Min. (') Sec. (") Deg. (°) Min. (') Sec. (")
1 EWHPL 01 1 13 43 20.9 76 31 3.9
2 EWHPL 02 2 13 43 25.4 76 31 1.5
3 EWHPL 03 3 13 43 30.0 76 30 59.0
4 EWHPL 04 4 13 43 34.6 76 30 57.2
5 EWHPL 05 5 13 43 39.3 76 30 55.6
6 EWHPL 06 6 13 43 43.8 76 30 53.1
7 EWHPL 07 7 13 43 50.0 76 30 50.5
8 EWHPL 08 8 13 43 54.5 76 30 48.0
9 EWHPL 09 9 13 44 3.9 76 30 44.9
10 EWHPL 10 10 13 45 33.0 76 31 5.9
11 EWHPL 11 11 13 45 28.2 76 31 6.4
12 EWHPL 12 12 13 45 23.4 76 31 7.0
13 EWHPL 13 13 13 45 18.9 76 31 7.7
14 EWHPL 14 14 13 45 14.3 76 31 8.3
15 EWHPL 15 15 13 45 10.2 76 31 9.5
16 EWHPL 16 16 13 44 54.0 76 31 12.3
17 EWHPL 17 17 13 44 49.2 76 31 13.1
18 EWHPL 18 18 13 44 44.5 76 31 14.7
19 EWHPL 19 19 13 44 39.8 76 31 16.7
20 EWHPL 20 20 13 44 35.4 76 31 19.9
21 EWHPL 21 21 13 44 30.5 76 31 19.8
22 EWHPL 22 22 13 44 25.6 76 31 20.2
23 EWHPL 23 23 13 44 21.7 76 31 26.4
24 EWHPL 24 24 13 44 16.9 76 31 27.7
25 EWHPL 25 25 13 44 12.0 76 31 28.2
26 EWHPL26 26 13 44 8.0 76 31 29.8
27 EWHPL 27 27 13 43 57.6 76 31 53.8
28 EWHPL 28 28 13 43 54.1 76 31 55.1
29 EWHPL 29 29 13 43 49.5 76 31 57.1
30 EWHPL 30 30 13 43 44.8 76 31 58.6
31 EWHPL 31 31 13 43 40.0 76 31 59.5
32 EWHPL 32 32 13 43 35.4 76 32 1.9
33 EWHPL 33 33 13 43 30.6 76 32 4.8
34 EWHPL 34 34 13 43 0.6 76 32 22.1
35 EWHPL 35 35 13 42 54.7 76 32 19.9
36 EWHPL 36 36 13 42 50.3 76 32 23.0
37 EWHPL 37 37 13 42 45.6 76 32 24.7
38 EWHPL 38 38 13 42 40.9 76 32 26.3
39 EWHPL 39 39 13 42 36.3 76 32 28.5
40 EWHPL 40 40 13 42 31.1 76 32 31.4
41 EWHPL 41 41 13 40 57.2 76 35 58.1
42 EWHPL 42 42 13 40 52.4 76 35 59.4
43 EWHPL 43 43 13 40 47.7 76 36 0.9
44 EWHPL 44 44 13 40 43.1 76 36 2.6
45 EWHPL 45 45 13 40 38.4 76 36 4.2
46 EWHPL 46 46 13 40 33.7 76 36 5.8
47 EWHPL 47 47 13 40 13.7 76 36 10.7
48 EWHPL 48 48 13 40 9.1 76 36 12.6
49 EWHPL 49 49 13 40 4.7 76 36 15.7
50 EWHPL 50 50 13 39 2.8 76 36 34.8
51 EWHPL 51 51 13 38 58.7 76 36 36.8
52 EWHPL 52 52 13 38 54.1 76 36 38.9
53 EWHPL 53 53 13 38 49.5 76 36 41.3
54 EWHPL 54 54 13 38 44.9 76 36 43.1
55 EWHPL 55 55 13 38 40.2 76 36 44.9
56 EWHPL 56 56 13 38 35.6 76 36 46.9
57 EWHPL 57 57 13 38 30.9 76 36 48.7
58 EWHPL 58 58 13 38 26.4 76 36 50.9
59 EWHPL 59 59 13 38 22.3 76 36 56.3
60 EWHPL 60 60 13 38 17.8 76 36 58.8
61 EWHPL 61 61 13 38 11.8 76 37 2.5
62 EWHPL 62 62 13 38 7.2 76 37 4.6
63 EWHPL 63 63 13 38 2.6 76 37 6.8
64 EWHPL 64 64 13 37 58.0 76 37 9.2
65 EWHPL 65 65 13 37 53.5 76 37 11.5
66 EWHPL 66 66 13 37 48.9 76 37 13.7
67 EWHPL 67 67 13 37 44.3 76 37 16.0
68 EWHPL 68 68 13 37 39.8 76 37 18.4
69 EWHPL 69 69 13 37 35.1 76 37 20.3
70 EWHPL 70 70 13 37 30.5 76 37 22.3
71 EWHPL 71 71 13 37 25.9 76 37 24.7
72 EWHPL 72 72 13 32 25.1 76 43 45.2
73 EWHPL 73 73 13 32 30.0 76 43 44.4
74 EWHPL 74 74 13 32 34.8 76 43 44.7
75 EWHPL 75 75 13 32 39.7 76 43 44.5
76 EWHPL 76 76 13 32 44.6 76 43 43.9
77 EWHPL 77 77 13 32 49.5 76 43 42.5
78 EWHPL 78 78 13 32 54.4 76 43 42.1
79 EWHPL 79 79 13 33 6.1 76 43 33.2
80 EWHPL 80 80 13 33 11.0 76 43 34.1
81 EWHPL 81 81 13 33 15.9 76 43 34.6
82 EWHPL 82 82 13 33 20.8 76 43 34.5
83 EWHPL 83 83 13 34 19.9 76 44 0.8
84 EWHPL 84 84 13 34 27.5 76 44 2.3
85 EWHPL 85 85 13 34 50.5 76 44 14.8
86 EWHPL 86 86 13 34 54.9 76 44 14.8
D.2. Map
District border of Tumkur and Chitradurga
SECTION E. Outcome stakeholder consultation process
Chitradurga District
District border of Tumkur and Chitradurga
Tumkur District
E.1. Assessment of stakeholder comments
[See Local Stakeholder Consultation Report B.5 and insert table from “C.3.iii Assessment of all comments”. Insert a summary of alterations based on comments]
Assessment of stakeholder comments during the meeting held in Chitradurga District:‐
Stakeholder comment Was comment taken into
account (Yes/ No)?
Explanation (Why? How?)
One of the stakeholders
questioned about the
afforestation work?
Yes Representative of PP
explained that we are doing
afforestation work in all the
hills where M/cs are installed.
One of the stakeholder asked
about any chances of drying
up Ground Water
Yes It was clarified that Wind
Mills do not use any ground
water for its process.
What is the generation
capacity of the Machine
Yes 800 kW per hour
One of the stakeholders
asked; Is there any scope of
purchasing machine by the
public?
Yes Stakeholders were appraised
that there is a scope of
purchasing machine by the
public. Enercon told the
stakeholder that, In
Maharashtra farmers
association has purchased
one machine.
One of the stakeholders asked
about the rumor that revenue
land is used wherever the
electrical line passes through?
Is it true
Yes PP clarified that revenue land
is not being used wherever
electrical overhead lines pass.
Access to the land is required
only for line inspection in
case of a fault.
Assessment of stakeholder comments during the meeting held in Tumkur District:‐
Stakeholder comment Was comment taken into
account (Yes/ No)?
Explanation (Why? How?)
One of the stakeholders
questioned; There is a
rumor that by running wind
mill, clouds are running away
from the area and thereby
causing drought situation?
Yes Representative of PP
explained that rumor is false.
The clouds are at a much
higher level and wind
machines are only at 55‐60
Meters height. Hence there is
no chance of rainy clouds
affected by running windmills
No negative comment was received during the meeting. Local people were appraising the project activity.
The details of the minutes of the meeting, invitation letter and attendance sheet have been attached as Annex A.
E.2. Stakeholder Feedback Round
Please describe report how the feedback round was organised, what the outcomes were and how you followed up on the feedback.
Stakeholders were encouraged to make comments on the project activity. Blind sustainable development exercise was organized to get clear picture of their views regarding the project activity. Stakeholders were asked to raise queries or comments on the project activity also and to give suggestions to make the project successful.
During the meeting in Chitradurga District, the local villagers responded to the questions queries made by Enercon included:
Question raised by company Response by stakeholders
Is there any Noise Pollution by running the Wind Mills?
No noise pollution as the projects are located in hilltops and away from villages
Is there any water draining, soil erosion due to Wind Mills
No water draining, soil erosion due to wind mills
Is there any problem for animals grazing in the hills? No, Cattle are grazing in hill areas as usual.
How Wind Mills helped in improvement of Crops? By increase in voltage capacity and less load shedding results in increase in food grain production.
Have you observed any deforestation problem? No deforestation has been observed.
During construction or erection any damages or accidents occurred?
No . The Project construction, erection and commissioning was smooth and all safety procedures were followed during the complete activity.
During the meeting in Tumkur District, the local villagers responded to the questions queries made by Enercon included:
Question raised by company Response by stakeholders
Is there any Noise Pollution by running Wind Mills? We do not know so far. Once the machines start running, we would come to know. But we heard that such noise pollution might not happen.
Any damages to the farmland due to water flow from the hilltops
Little damage is taken place due to water inflow. Company representatives have promised that the check dams will be constructed, which will not allow the water and soil to enter into the fields.
Any type of loss of minerals occurred due to Wind Project
No. Such Minerals are not found in the hill areas.
Is there any problem for animals grazing in the hills? No, since the road is there, it has helped the farmers to graze their animals easily.
How Wind mills helped in improvement of Crops?
After running the machine only we can assess. But definitely there will be an improvement since we’ll get uninterrupted power supply to our pump sets causing increase in food crops.
Any damages to the Forest by establishing Wind Mills
There has not been any damage to forestland due to erection of Wind Mills.
No negative comment was received. Stakeholders were of the opinion that the project will lead to environment, social development and technological & economic development in local area.
E. 3. Discussion on continuous input / grievance mechanism
Discuss the Continuous input / grievance mechanism expression method and details, as discussed with local stakeholders.
Method Chosen (include all known details e.g. location of book, phone, number, identity of mediator)
Justification
Continuous Input / Grievance Expression Process Book
The details of grievances/ inputs will be kept at the site office and will be maintained by the O & M team;
Meeting will be held at regular periodicity with the local stakeholders to discuss the grievances/ inputs
The contact details of the O & M team would be made available to the local villagers
A register will be placed at Project Site office at Chitradurga which is an accessible place, where local villagers can come and place their complaints/ inputs. This will be checked once in a month.
The meeting will be held once in three months at Project Site office at Chitradurga.
Appropriate reporting will take place and the record can be checked any time
Non‐interruptive continuous process so as to avoid communication gap .
Anyone from the village can access team in case of any urgency or with his/her routine inputs
Telephone access The contact details of the O & M team will be given to the local villagers in case any urgent issue is required to be addressed
Name: Mr. Sharad Yadab
Contact Details:‐ 9611786720
Can access team in case of any urgency
Internet/email access www.windworldindia.com.;
Nominated Independent Mediator (optional)
Local Panchayat Head or any other person nominated by the Panchayat body
Members nominated by the local villagers who are well aware of the local issues and are capable of putting forward relevant concerns of the villagers
To implement the above method for addressing the grievances, the following operational structure is followed:
All issues identified during the crediting period through any of the Methods shall have a mitigation measure in place. The identified issue should be discussed in the revised Passport and the corresponding mitigation measure should be added to sustainability monitoring plan in section G.
SECTION F. Outcome Sustainability assessment
F.1. ‘Do no harm’ Assessment
Safeguarding principles Description of relevance
to my project
Assessment of my
project risks breaching it
(low/medium/high)
Mitigation
measure
Human Rights
1. The project respects
internationally proclaimed
The project activity
doesn’t obstruct the
Low None
human rights including
dignity, cultural property and
uniqueness of indigenous
people. The project is not
complicit in Human Rights
abuses.
human right or liberty of
any person or collective
freedom of the locals in
project area. The project
area is not inhibited by
indigenous people. India
has signed the universal
declaration of Human
rights (UDHR) 1
2. The project does not involve
and is not complicit in
involuntary resettlement.
Since the project has been
installed at Government
lease land therefore
project does not involve
and is not complicit in
involuntary resettlement.
The project has not
resulted in any person’s
relocation. The project has
resulted in economic
development of the
nearby villages by creating
job opportunities, road
infrastructure etc. Host
country India has ratified
ILO convention 169 and
has placed the rule of
prohibiting involuntary
settlement. The project
installation is as per the
legislation followed by
Government of India
Low None
3. The project does not involve
and is not complicit in the
alteration, damage or removal
of any critical cultural
heritage.
Since the project is installed at barren land, the project does not involve and is not complicit in the alteration, damage or removal of any critical cultural heritage.
India Government has its
legislation in place which
Low None
1http://mha.nic.in/uniquepage.asp?Id_Pk=235
prohibits any kind of
damage to the cultural
property / heritage. The
project installation is as
per the legislation
followed by Government
of India.
Labour Standards
4. The project respects the
employees’ freedom of
association and their right to
collective bargaining and is
not complicit in restrictions of
these freedoms and rights
Labour rights are protected as per labour law2 in India. The right to unionize, bargain collectively are highly protected by this law. The project fully respects the employee’s freedom and rights and all related laws endorsed by Government of India.
Though India has not ratified the ILO convention 87(freedom of association) and 98(right to collective bargaining) but it strongly supports both the conditions for better development of workers. As per article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India, India guarantees all its citizens the right “to form associations and unions”. The project follows all the regulations prevailing in India for ensuring employees’ freedom and rights.
Low None
5. The project does not involve
and is not complicit in any
form of forced or compulsory
labour.
All employees that were engaged in the project implementation on a voluntary basis. The project fully respects the employee’s rights in accordance with all labour
Low None
2http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:11110:3115744615707331::NO:11110:P11110_COUNTRY_ID:102691
related laws. The law compliance is subject to government’s inspection and ruling. In case of any terms of violation, due penalty would be enforced as in accordance to the regulations. India has ratified ILO conventions no 29 & 105 on elimination of forced and compulsory labour.
6. The project does not employ
and is not complicit in any
form of child labour.
The project does not involve the employment and complicit of child labour. The Host country has its own credible legislation in place prohibiting child labour.
In India, there is a comprehensive definition of child labour in terms of age limit, working hours, etc. Such employment regulations are described in India Labour Law. According to ‘Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 Chapter II 3’, law guarantees that “every child of the age of six to fourteen years shall have the right to free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till completion of elementary education”; Adiitionally, Child Labour Act 1986 specifies minimum age of employment as 14 years.
Employing a child in India
is already punishable with
imprisonment according to
the Child Labour Act 1986,
Juvenile Justice Act 2000,
Bonded Labour Act, and
the Indian Penal Code. The
Low None
project requires a limited
number of skilled
employees to operate,
maintain and manage the
plant. Therefore, it does
not employ and is not
complicit in any form of
child labour.
7. The project does not involve
and is not in complicit in any
form of discrimination based
on gender, race, religion,
sexual orientation or any
other basis.
India has ratified ILO
Convention 100 (equal
remuneration) and
Convention 111
(discrimination in
employment/occupation).
The project does not
involve and is not
complicit in any form of
discrimination based on
gender, race, religion,
sexual orientation or any
other basis.
Low None
8. The project provides workers
with a safe and healthy work
environment and is not
complicit in exposing workers
to unsafe or unhealthy work
environments
A wind project in general does not expose workers to unsafe or unhealthy work environments in terms of toxins or chemicals. In addition the project follows national safety rules under (Host Country) Labour Law that covers work safety. Enercon India Limited is the project developer as well as operation & maintenance contractor. Enercon India Limited is ISO 9001:2008 certified and follows all safety measures as required during the identification of the site, wind resource assessment, logistics, finance, construction, commissioning and operation of the project.
Low None
Environmental Protection
9. The project takes a
precautionary approach in
regard to environmental
challenges and is not complicit
in practices contrary to the
precautionary principle.
The precautionary principles have been applied in this project. The environment is protected by several Law 3 and Regulations in the Host country (India). The purpose of the “Law on Environmental Protection” is to protect the environment with principles of sustainable development and environment. Project owner has conducted the EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) to study impacts on the environment resulting from the project activity. EIA study demonstrated that there is no major impact on the environment due to the installation and operation of the windmills.
Low None
10. The project does not involve
and is not in complicit in
significant conversion or
degradation of critical natural
habitats including those (a)
that are legally protected (b)
officially proposed for
protection (c) identified by
authoritative resources for
their high conservation value
or (d) recognised as protected
by traditional local
communities.
The project does not involve and is not complicit in significant conversion or degradation of critical natural habitats. The environment is protected by several Laws and Regulations in the Host country (India). The purpose of the “Law on Environmental Protection” is to protect the environment with principles of sustainable development and environment.
Low None
Anti‐Corruption
11. The project does not involve
and is not complicit in
corruption.
India has ratified the UN
Convention against
corruption and also has it
Low None
3http://envfor.nic.in/legis/eia/so1533.pdf
National Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988. The
project does not involve
and will not be complicit in
corruption.
Additional relevant critical issues
for my project type
Description of relevance
to my project
Assessment of relevance
to my project
(low/medium/high)
Mitigation
measure
1. Labour standard 2. Shadow flicker 3. Electromagnetic
interference and radiation (EMI)
4. Species morality 5. Landscape and visual
impact 6. Dust emission
1. N/A; the company is registered under the Companies Act, 1956, hence is well acquainted with the requirements of the labour standard.
2. N/A; Shadow flicker is the flickering effect caused when rotating wind turbine blades periodically cast shadows through constrained openings such as the windows of neighboring properties. The project land is of barren type, hence, no such impact is there. Further, it does not have any impact on the surroundings as grazing animals always roam around the project activity as explained in the minutes of the stakeholders’ meeting.
3. N/A; the project land is of barren type; hence, does not involve any electromagnetic interference and radiation (EMI).
4. N/A; the project land is of barren type; hence, does not involve any barrier to the living pattern of the birds/species.
5. N/A; the project land is plain and barren type; hence, does not pose
N/A N/A
any to the landscape.6. N/A; the project is a
wind power generation project, hence, does not result into dust emission.
F.2. Sustainable Development matrix
Insert table as in section D3 from your Stakeholder Consultation report (Sustainable Development matrix).
Indicator Mitigation
measure
Relevance to
achieving MDG
Chosen parameter
and explanation
Preliminary score
Gold Standard
indicators of
sustainable
development.
If relevant copy
mitigation
measure from "do
no harm" –table,
or include
mitigation
measure used to
neutralise a score
of ‘–‘
Check
www.undp.or/md
g and
www.mdgmonito
r.org
Describe how
your indicator is
related to local
MDG goals
Defined by project
developer
Negative impact:
score ‘‐‘ in case
negative impact is not
fully mitigated
score 0 in case impact
is planned to be fully
mitigated
No change in impact:
score 0
Positive impact:
score ‘+’
Air quality No mitigation measures required.
GOAL 7
Ensure
Environmental
Sustainability
Parameter:
SOx and NOx
emission reductions
caused by the
project in parallel
with the CO2
emission
reductions, as a
result of generating
electricity from
wind power in place
of fossil fuel fired
power plants.
Explanation:
Indian national
electricity grid is
0
mainly depends on
fossil fuel fired
power plants and
these plants emit
gases such as SOx,
NO2 along with
CO2 emissions.
Wind power plants
are zero emission
projects. The
project has not only
reduced the
emissions of
greenhouse gases
(CO2) generated by
the National Grid,
but has also
reduced the
emissions of other
polluting gases such
as SOx, NOx etc.
However, the effect
of reduction of
these gasses are
negligible since the
electricity
generation capacity
of the project is
very low as
compared to the
Indian national grid.
Such contribution is difficult to qualify or measure; therefore, this indicator is
scored neutrally.
Water quality and
quantity
No mitigation
measures required.
GOAL 7
Ensure
Environmental
Sustainability
Parameter:
Release of
pollutants and its
impact on the
environment and
0
human health.
Explanation:
The project activity being a wind power project, there is no scope for the above mentioned parameter i.e, there is no impact on water and water bodies due to the project activity. However, such contribution is difficult to qualify or measure;
therefore, this indicator is scored neutrally.
Soil condition No mitigation
measures required.
GOAL 7
Ensure
Environmental
Sustainability
Parameter:
Soil contamination by SOx, NOx, cadmium etc and level of soil erosion
Explanation:
No negative impact
on soil condition in
the region is
expected because
excavation is done
only during the
construction of the
project activity.
The excavated earth
has been reused
for the filling of the
turbine foundation
and site levelling
purposes. Thus, no
excavated soil has
been transported
or stored outside
the project area.
0
Other pollutants Only during
construction phase,
noise occurs in
project area. In
Enercon WEGs, the
micro‐vortex strip
converts the
aerodynamic mega‐
vortex into
microscopically
small vortices
thereby ensuring
multiple yields and
significantly less
noise.
The Enercon‐WEGs
feature a variety of
individual
adjustments so that
it corresponds to
the site‐specific
noise
requirements. In
addition to the
aerodynamic
research into the
rotor unit, which
has led to a
constant reduction
of noise levels in
the last few years,
Enercon has also
been able to
suppress the
machinery noise
significantly. A
typical example of
the progress made
by the Enercon‐
WEGs is that even
when a person is
standing next to it,
the overall noise
GOAL 7
Ensure
Environmental
Sustainability
Parameter:
Level of dust
emissions and noise
pollution during the
construction and
operation of the
wind farm
Explanation:
Project activity is
located in remote
location far away
from human
population and
level of noise level
during the
construction and
operation phase is
under the limit, not
to create
disturbance in local
area. Moreover
wind turbines are
designed to operate
at minimal noise
level.
Also most of the
construction
activities occurred
during the day
when higher noise
levels are tolerated
due to higher
background noise
levels. In addition,
the construction
activity was
undertaken for a
period of 4–5
months only .
During operation
phase of the
0
level produced by
the converter is
equivalent to that
of a normal
conversation and at
a distance of 200m
the noise is scarcely
audible.
project, noise is
likely to be
generated only due
to rotor movement
which is located at
a height of 74 m.
Thus, the impact on
ambient noise level
on general
population is
insignificant. There
is no visual
pollution involved in
case of the project
activity. These
parameters have a
very negligible
impact as compared
to the baseline.
Therefore this
parameter has been
scored neutrally.
Biodiversity In order to reduce
the collision risk for
birds and bats, the
following
mitigation
actions have been
taken:
EIA study has been
conducted prior to
project
implementation
and project site
doesn’t fall on the
pathway of
migratory birds.
Prevention and
control measures
to address these
impacts include the
following:
GOAL 7
Ensure
Environmental
Sustainability
Parameter:
Impact on plants,
tress and bird in
project area.
Explanation:
No barrier for animals, bird and bat flights There is no
endangered flora or
fauna in the project
area. Also, the wind
mills not have any
effect on the
animals. There is no
change in the
grazing landscape
of the area since
area required for
the project is
0
− Conduct site
selection to
account for known
migration pathways
or areas where
birds and bats are
highly
concentrated.
Examples of high
concentration
areas include
wetlands
designated wildlife
refuges, staging
areas, rookeries,
bat hibernation
areas, roosts,
ridges, river
valleys, and
riparian areas;
− Implement
appropriate storm
water management
measures to avoid
creating attractions
such as small ponds
which can attract
birds and bats for
feeding or nesting
near the wind farm.
negligible as
compared to the
overall expanse of
the grazing area.
Although the
project site is not
located on a major
migration route, in
order to mitigate
the risk of collision
of birds and bats
with the wind
turbines, the wind
mills have been
designed and
located
appropriately.
Quality of
employment
Skill enhancement
and improvement
in qualitative
aspects of jobs
GOAL 1:
Eradicate
Extreme Poverty
and
Hunger
Parameter:
Staff recruitment and Training
Operation and Maintenance training and qualitatively better work opportunities
Explanation:
The project
+
proponent aims for
improvement of
safety for workers
and better
conditions to work.
Local staff were
recruited at the
time of construction
and operation of
the wind power
plant. Training was
also imparted to
them so as to
enable them to
acquire the
necessary skills for
the job.
(Specific details
provided in Annex
B)
Since this indictaor
has a positive and
direct contribution,
it has been scored
positive
Livelihood of the
poor
No mitigation
measures required
GOAL 1:
Eradicate
Extreme Poverty
and Hunger
Parameter:
Poverty alleviation
Explanation:
The project has helped in generating livelihood for the local residents by creating employment opportunities and by catalyzing the overall economic activities in the region. The contribution can be directly attributed to the project
+
activity. Hence, this indicator has been scored positive.
(Annex C)
Access to
affordable and
clean energy
services
No mitigation
measures required
GOAL 7: “Ensuring
the environmental
sustainability”
Parameter:
Change in traditional fuel consumption and energy consumption pattern of local people.
Explanation:
Although the project activity promotes access to affordable and clean source of energy, but its direct contribution in the specific region can’t be measured. Hence, this indicator has been scored neutral.
0
Human and
institutional
capacity
No mitigation
measures required
GOAL 1: Eradicate
Extreme Poverty
and
Hunger
GOAL 2:
”Achieve Universal
Primary Education
Parameter:
Improved access to health, education and basic infrastructure Explanation:
Project proponent has endeavoured to enhance the human and institutional capacity amongst the local stakeholders by providing them improved access to basic needs such as health, education and connectivity
+
infrastructure. The overall objective of these CSR initiatives being undertaken by PP is for the upliftment of socio‐economic status of the local stakeholders and generation of additional income generation activities through better connectivity, health, education, skill development and capacity building. Some of the initiatives undertaken by the PP have been shown in Annex C
Quantitative
employment and
income
generation
No mitigation
measures required
GOAL 1:
Eradicate
Extreme Poverty
and
Hunger
Parameter:
Number of jobs created in the operation of the wind farm and the wages paid to employees.
Explanation:
Project has employed people during the construction and operation phases including local residents, thereby increasing local income. Necessary skills were also imparted to the people from local community so as to make them employable for
+
specific jobs.
During construction
phase of the wind
farm, 15 persons
have been
employed for
security purpose
and 30 persons
have been
employed for
construction
activities from
nearby villages.
During Operation
and Maintenance
phase of the wind
farm, there are 25
persons employed
for service related
activities from
nearby villages. The
document will be
submitted to DOE
for review during
verification.
(Annex B)
Access to
investment
No mitigation
measures required
GOAL 8:
Develop a
Global Partnership
for Development
Reduction of fossil
fuel use
In India, thermal
power plants are
primarily using coal
as fuel. Therefore,
renewable wind
power plants will
Decrease
dependency on
these fossil fuels.
However, since this
impact is small in
relation to macro‐
economic
0
perspective, a
neutral score
is chosen.
Technology
transfer and
technological self‐
reliance
No mitigation
measures required
GOAL 8:
Develop a
Global Partnership
for Development
Enercon (India) Ltd
(EIL) has secured
and facilitated the
technology transfer
for wind based
renewable energy
generation from
Enercon GmbH, has
established a
manufacturing plant
at Daman in India,
where along with
other components
the "Synchronous
Generators" using
"Vacuum
Impregnation"
technology are
manufactured.
Unlike conventional
Wind Turbines
prevalent in Indian
market, EIL turbines
have gearless
technology.
Gearless turbines
have several
operational and
maintenance
advantages over
turbines with
conventional
gearboxes. The
Project involves 86
wind energy
converters (WECs)
of EIL make (800 kW
E‐48). The project
was commissioned
in 2006. After the
+
commissioning of
the project, more
than 500 MW of
additional capacity
based on similar
technology has
been installed in the
surrounding areas.
This has been
achieved because of
the inherent
advantages of the
technology as well
as extensive
information
dissemination
initiatives
undertaken by EIL
through formal and
informal channels.
Hence the
technology transfer
and technological
self‐reliance
attributes of the
project have been
well established.
Therefore this
indicator has been
scored positive.
Justification choices, data source and provision of references
Air quality The project activity helps reduce emissions of SOx and NOx, which are released from other conventional sources of energy. However, the contribution is difficult to qualify or measure; therefore, this indicator is scored neutrally and no parameter is chosen to monitor the impact. Hence, this indicator has given score “neutral”.
There was dust emergence attributable to the project activity. During the
construction phase caused by digging foundations, land arrangement works and
installation of the towers. Dust emission control systems were used in compliance
with the regulation of Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Furthermore, there are
no settlements close to the project site; hence the impact of dust was very limited.
Water quality and
quantity
There is no water usage or effluent generation during operation of wind turbines,
water is only used during erection of wind mills & for domestic purposes.
Additionally, no impact on water quality and quantity was expected during the
Environmental Impact Assessment conducted for the project activity.
(Environmental Impact Assessment for Wind Farms at Chitradurga, Karnataka –
November 2006, Section 1.6.2.3 & 3.5.1)
In terms of water quantity, the wind power plant helps to reduce water consumption
as compared to the fossil fuel based plants, which consume huge amount of water.
However, the contribution is difficult to qualify or measure; therefore, this indicator
has scored as ‘neutral’ and no parameter has been chosen to monitor the impact.
Soil condition Soil excavation activity was undertaken during the construction of the project
activity. However, there was no negative impact on soil condition in the region
occurred because of the project activity. The excavated earth was stored at the
turbine locations and re‐used for the filling of the turbine foundation and site
levelling purposes. Thus, no excavated soil was transported or stored outside the
project area.
Hence, this indicator has given score “neutral”.
(Environmental Impact Assessment for Wind Farms at Chitradurga, Karnataka –
November 2006, Section 4.2.3)
Other pollutants During project construction phase, a very nominal noise occurred in the activity area.
In Enercon WEGs, the micro‐vortex strip converts the aerodynamic mega‐vortex into
microscopically small vortices thereby ensuring multiple yields and significantly less
noise.
The Enercon‐WEGs features a variety of individual adjustments so that it
corresponds to the site‐specific noise requirements. In addition to the aerodynamic
research into the rotor unit, which has led to a constant reduction of noise levels in
the last few years, Enercon has also been able to suppress the machinery noise
significantly. With diminishing the noise generally produced by electromagnetism,
the poles on the Generator stator have been redesigned. A typical example of the
progress made by the Enercon‐WEGs is that even when a person is standing next to
it, the overall noise level produced by the converter is equivalent to that of a normal
conversation and at a distance of 200m the noise is scarcely audible. Hence, this
indicator has been scored “neutral”
(Environmental Impact Assessment for Wind Farms at Chitradurga, Karnataka –
November 2006, Section 2.2.2.7)
Biodiversity There is no endangered flora or fauna in the project area.
Also, the project has no effect on the animals of the villagers. There is no change in
grazing landscape of the area since area required for the project activity is negligible
as compared to the expanse of the grazing area.
Although the project site is not located on a major migration route, in order to
mitigate the risk of collision of birds and bats with the wind turbines, the wind
turbines have been designed and located appropriately.
Hence, this indicator has been scored “neutral”
(Environmental Impact Assessment for Wind Farms at Chitradurga, Karnataka –
November 2006, Section 4.6)
Quality of
employment
The project proponent not only encourages local employment generation for the
project related activities, but also promotes enhancement of qualitative aspects of
employment such as structured safety trainings, capacity building, skill enhancement
These activities create safe working conditions and impart necessary skills to the
employed locals. These safety training and skill enhancement opportunities would
not have been offered in the absence of project and have resulted in a positive
impact on the overall quality of employment. (Environmental Impact Assessment
for Wind Farms at Chitradurga, Karnataka – November 2006, 4.7)
Livelihood of the poor The project has helped in generating livelihoods for the local residents by creating employment opportunities and by catalysing the overall economic activities in the region. The contribution can be directly attributed to the project activity. Hence, this indicator has been scored positive.
(Environmental Impact Assessment for Wind Farms at Chitradurga, Karnataka –
November 2006, 4.7)
Access to affordable
and clean energy
services
The project has reduced dependency on fossil fuels (coal, diesel, natural gas, etc.)
and created more affordable clean energy for India. Electrical energy generated by
the project has been supplied to the national grid under Power Purchase Agreement
(PPA) . The electricity generation by the project is being monitored on regular basis.
Human and
institutional capacity
Project proponent has endeavoured to enhance the human and institutional capacity amongst the local stakeholders by providing them improved access to basic needs such as health, education and connectivity infrastructure. The overall objective of these CSR initiatives being undertaken by PP is for the upliftment of socio‐economic status of the local stakeholders and generation of additional income generation activities through better connectivity, health, education, skill development and capacity building. Since the CSR and human development activities undertaken by the PP have a direct positive impact on the overall socio‐economic status of the local populace, therefore the parameter is scored with (+) in SDM.
Total number of local villagers who have been directly/indirectly benefitted for the CSR activities being undertaken by the Project Proponent shall serve as evidence for positive impact of the project activity to this indicator.
Quantitative
employment and
income generation
Project has generated direct as well as indirect employment opportunities for the local community during both the construction and operation phases. This has resulted in income and livelihood generation and has enhanced the overall quality of life of the local populace. The project proponent also monitors the number of jobs created as a result of the project activity. Therefore the parameter is scored with (+)
in SDM.
(Environmental Impact Assessment for Wind Farms at Chitradurga, Karnataka –
November 2006, 2.9.5 & 4.7)
Access to investment In India, thermal power plants are using coal as fuel which is a fossil fuel. Therefore,
renewable power plants like wind power plants decrease dependency on these fossil
fuels. However, since this impact is small in relation to macro‐economic perspective,
a neutral score is chosen no parameter is chosen for monitoring
Technology transfer
and technological self‐
reliance
Project has provided opportunities to access wind technology and equipment via
training, workshops and practical experience of operating a wind power plant which
is still at a nascent stage in terms of share in the overall power generation scenario.
Parameters chosen for monitoring of this indicator are covered by the monitoring of
quality of employment.
SECTION G. Sustainability Monitoring Plan
No 1
Indicator Other pollutants
Mitigation measure In order to mitigate the noise level the turbines with reduced noise operation system were chosen and they are properly positioned in terms of possible noise emissions.
Chosen parameter The noise level in the region after the project implementation
Repeat for each parameter
Current situation of parameter Natural wind noise in the region.
Estimation of baseline situation of parameter
No project activity.
Future target for parameter To keep the noise level lowest as possible using R&D in development of wind turbine. It is not expected from the project to cause more than the allowed noise limits set by the ministry.
Way of monitoring How By noise level measurement
When In case of a complaint
By who The company / Project manager
No 2
Indicator Biodiversity
Mitigation measure According to the EIA Report of the project, there is no endangered flora or fauna in the region. However, in order to
mitigate the possible negative impacts of the project, some precautions are planned to be taken, such as: the site is selected in an area where there are no important bird areas, wetlands or high bird activity; sufficient distance (from 200 m to 1,320 m) is placed between the turbines; appropriate storm water management measures are implemented to avoid creating small ponds which can attract birds and bats for feeding or nesting near the wind farm.
Chosen parameter Design and location of the turbines
Repeat for each parameter
Current situation of parameter No barrier for bird and bat flights
Estimation of baseline situation of parameter
No barrier for bird and bat flights
Future target for parameter Although the project is not located on a bird migration route and the bird collision risk is very low, the blades are painted by reflecting colour and appropriate lighting of the wind turbines are also provided.
In addition, appropriate storm water management measures are implemented to avoid creating small ponds which can attract birds and bats for feeding or nesting near the wind farm.
Way of monitoring How Painting the turbines before the installation and controlling theproject site continuously
When Continuously
By who The company / Project manager
No 3
Indicator Quality of employment
Mitigation measure N/A
Repeat for each parameter
Chosen parameter Training records, categories of jobs created, working conditions of the project activity, occupation health management, safeguards put in place and living standards of the plant staff.
Current situation of parameter Current situation is the same as baseline situation
Estimation of baseline situation of parameter
39 people have been employed for the purpose of security and other jobs, wherein all essential norms pertaining to safety, occupational health and working conditions are being followed.
The bifurcation of the employed people for the project activity as follows:
1. WWIL staff : 22
2. Contracted labor: 7
3. Security Guard: 10
Future target for parameter ‐ Skill enhancement exercise would be undertaken for the local staff by providing them will be training on the technical aspects of the project operation. They will receive professional certificates.
‐ All aspects of occupational health and working conditions would be strengthened through capacity building and awareness generation activities.
The project proponent shall work in collaboration with local health authorities and medical centers to conduct regular health checkups and provide better medical facilities to the local staff.
Way of monitoring How Checking documentation pertaining to training programmes, awareness generation activities etc. , photographs , interviews
When Annual
By who Project Proponent
No 4
Indicator Access to affordable and clean energy services
Mitigation measure N/A
Repeat for each parameter
Chosen parameter Electricity generation from the wind power plant
Current situation of parameter Same as baseline situation
Estimation of baseline situation of parameter
Wind power electricity is being generated from the project activity
Future target for parameter More electricity generation from wind power plants
Way of monitoring How Quantity of electricity generation
When Annual
By who Project Proponent
No 5
Indicator Livelihood of the poor
Mitigation measure N/A
Repeat for each parameter
Chosen parameter Total no of local villagers employed for project related activities
Current situation of parameter People employed as security guard, technical staff and as labour for the project
Estimation of baseline situation of parameter
115
Future target for parameter Ten additional job opportunities
Way of monitoring How Attendance register
When Annually
By who Project Proponent
No 4
Indicator Human and Institutional capacity
Mitigation measure N/A
Repeat for each parameter
Chosen parameter Total no of local villagers directly as well as indirectly impacted by the CSR initiatives undertaken by the Project Proponent
Current situation of parameter Several programmes pertaining to capacity building, health, education and provision of clean drinking water have been initiated
Estimation of baseline situation of parameter
Around 250 villagers have directly or indirectly benefitted from the CSR initiatives
Future target for parameter Scale of the CSR activities would be enhanced so that the number of direct as well as indirect beneficiaries increase by 100.
Way of monitoring How CSR programme documentary evidence
When Annual
By who Project Proponent
No 5
Indicator Quantitative employment and income generation
Mitigation measure N/A
Repeat for each parameter
Chosen parameter Number of employment opportunities created
Current situation of parameter 115 people have been employed so far during the construction and the operation of the project activity
Estimation of baseline situation of parameter
Current situation is the baseline situation
Future target for parameter Ten additional job opportunities to be created for the local population. . Income generation to be enhanced by creating relatively high value job opportunities through training and capacity building
Way of monitoring How Documentation pertaining to employment, attendance register and documentary details of training/capacity building
When Annual
By who Project Proponent
Additional remarks monitoring
N/A
SECTION H. Additionality and conservativeness
This section is only applicable if the section on additionality and/or your choice of baseline does not follow Gold Standard guidance
H.1. Additionality
Additionality assessment is performed in accordance to the “Tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality”, version 03.0.0 approved by UNFCCC. Details are available in the validated PDD reference number 1259 registered on 27 Oct 2008.
H.2. Conservativeness
A conservative approach has been followed in calculating the baseline emission factors and investment analysis sections as detailed in the PDD.
The current version of CEA database is version 09 and if we calculate emission reduction based on this version it will result in higher emission reduction in comparison to Emissions factor calculated based on the method provided in ACM0002 version 06 as described in registered CDM project PDD
Hence as an element of conservativeness this is calculated based on data provided in registered CDM PDD.
ANNEX 1 ODA declaration
Annex A:
Pubic Consultation in Local Language‐Chitradurga,Tumkur
Attendance Sheet
Public Notice:Tumkur,Chitradurga
Pubic Consultation in English‐Chitradurga,Tumkur
Annex B: Training Attendance sheet
Annex C: Donation in School
Annex D: Water Conservation
Annex F: Plantation Work by EIL
Annex G: Animal grazing near Wind Farm