annex 6 - the beehive · (f) the nhb contract on behalf of the minister with dhbs for regional and...
TRANSCRIPT
Annex 6 Meeting the Challenge:
Report Recommendations
2
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
Report Recommendations 3
1 Closer to home: new models of care 3
2 Improving patient safety and quality of care 4
3 Identifying the services people need: funding new services 5
4 The right service in the right place: changing service configuration 6
5 The right capacity for the future: making better investments 7
6 Shifting resources to the front-line 7
7 Getting more from our public hospitals: improving hospital productivity 7
8 Further work 8
9 Conclusion 8
Annex 2 Recommendations 9
1 Enhancing Clinical Leadership 9
2 Initiatives to increase elective services and reduce patient waiting times, improve access to timely primary and hospital services and improve productivity and quality of services for patients 10
3 Ways to establish clinical networks and leadership programmes to support these goals 11
4 Establishing and fostering greater clinical leadership in primary care and across primary and hospital care within DHBs – primary and hospital integration 12
5 The acceleration of national quality and safety improvement programmes 12
Annex 3 Recommendations 14
1 Capital expenditure 14
2 Workforce 14
3 Information technology 15
Annex 4 Recommendations 17
1 Testing the line-by-line spending review with the Ministry to identify any additional in-depth reviews or longer-term work that will need to be addressed 17
2 Consideration of the Ministry’s role as a manager of a range of national operational functions 17
3 Selectively reviewing the rest-of -sector expenditure, including DHBs, to reduce waste and bureaucracy and improve spending quality and patient service 18
4 Review the reporting and accountability processes between the Ministry, DHBs and PHOs to improve focus and reduce unnecessary bureaucracy 19
5 Selectively review the plethora of existing Ministerial and Ministry committees and functions 20
Contents
3
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
Report Recommendations
1 Closer to home: new models of care
The MRG recommends that the Government:
(a) RequiretheNHB(fornationalservices)andtheDHBs(forregionalandlocalservices)toreportannuallyon
thedevelopmentofclinicalnetworksandassesstheircost-effectivenessinhelpingtodeliverseamlesscare
forpatients,
(b)ClarifythattheroleofPHOsis:todomoretokeeppeoplewell;toreduceavoidablehospitaladmissionsand
unplannedreadmissions;toshareresponsibilityforshiftingservicesfromsecondarytoprimarysettings
whensensible;andtoreduceunnecessaryGPreferrals,
(c) ReducethemanagementfeespaidtoPHOswithanenrolledpopulationoflessthan40,000andusethe
resultingsavingstohelpthesePHOstotransitiontoastrongermanagementconfiguration(e.g.via
amalgamation,confederation,orsomeotherarrangementforsharingmanagerialsupport-seeAnnex4
recommendationsformoredetail),
(d)RequireDHBstoagreeprotocolsandestablishagreements,withcontractualandfinancialincentives,among
community,primary,andsecondaryproviderstodevelopnewmodelsofcarethatarepatient-centric,less
fractured,andmorecost-effective.Thisshouldincludeagreementstoreduceavoidablehospitaladmissions
andunplannedreadmissionstodevelopcost-effectivesubstitutesforsecondarycaretostrengthenincentives
formoreefficientandeffectiveuseofreferredservices.Financialincentivesforrisksharingshouldbe
strengthenedforthosePHOswhoalreadyhavethecapabilitytomanagethefinancialrisksassociatedwith
takinggreaterresponsibilityforthehealthoftheirenrolledpopulations.DHBsshouldalsoberequiredto
reportonthedevelopmentoftheseagreementsandassesstheircost-effectiveness,
(e) TheNHBshouldassumeresponsibilityforthepreparationofnationallyconsistentcontractsthatDHBs,
PHOs,andothersmightchoosetouseforthepurposeofmeetingtherequirementsinrecommendation
(d)above.Thesecontractsshouldincludesomeformofrevenueandcostsharingwhereappropriate,
(f) ReassesstheroleofthePHOPerformanceProgrammeinthelightofthedevelopmentofthesebroader
arrangements,
(g)EnsurethattheNHB,DHBsandPHOsworktogethertodevelopsharedelectronicaccesstoacommon
patientrecordsbasedonadistributedapproach(seeAnnex3)andwithinareasonabletimeframe,and
(h)Withinthreeyears,theGovernmentshouldseekanassessmentofthosePHOsthatarenotsuccessfully
meetingtherequirementsoftheirrolewithaviewtoremovingthem.
4
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
2 Improving patient safety and quality of care
(a) ThequalityprogrammesinitiatedbyQICareusedasafoundationtodevelopthenextphaseofnational
qualityandsafetyprogrammesthataddresspatientsafetyandcontinuousqualityimprovement.Existing
initiativesshouldbecomebusinessasusualforDHBs,whoshouldassumethefundingforthemasthe
existingQICbudgetisworkedthrough,
(b)ThecurrentPHOPerformanceProgrammeshouldbescaledbackforaperiodand
theresultingsavingsusedtohelpacceleratetheintroductionofqualityimprovementforprimarycareusing
theQ14GPasastartingpoint,and
(c) AnindependentnationalqualityagencyisestablishedtoreplaceQICandwithresponsibilityforhelping
providersacrossthewholesectorimprovepatientsafetyandservicequality,withthefollowingrolesand
characteristics:
(i) Theagencyisindependentoftheregulatory,fundingandperformancemonitoringagenciesof
government,reportingdirectlytotheMinisterandwithitsownstaff,
(ii) Theagency’sroleshouldbeto:developamenuof‘certified‘programmesforproviderstochoosefrom;
developsafetyandqualitystandardsandguidelines;benchmarkandgathercomparativedataonwhat
worksandwhy;runworkshopsaimedathelpingcliniciansandmanagerstomakeimprovements;and
publishnationalreportsofqualityindicatorse.g.seriousandsentinelevents,
(iii)Theagencyshouldacttoensuresectorbuy-intoitsprogrammes,recognisingthatprogrammeswillnot
besustainediftheyaremandatedandforcedonthesector,
(iv)AgencyfundingshouldbeamixtureoftopslicedPBFF(recognisingtheproportionoftheagency’stime
devotedtoDHBs),andchargingprivateproviderswhowanttouseitformanagingtheimplementation
ofagency-certifiedprogrammes,and
(v) Atsomepoint,thisagencyshouldbecomemoreindependentofgovernmentandbefundedbya
mixtureoffee-basedqualityprogrammesandfinancialsubscriptionsfrompublicandprivatemember
organisations.
5
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
3 Identifying the services people need: funding new services
The MRG recommends that the SPNIA process be abandoned and replaced with:
(a) AreconfiguredandstrengthenedNHCwiththeroleofevaluatingallnew–andanongoingselectionof
existing–healthanddisabilityservices.Thisroletoinclude:
(i) Assessingtheextenttowhichnewhealthanddisabilityservicesareclinicallysafeandshouldattract
publicfundingbasedontheireffectivenessandcost,
(ii) Determiningtheconditionsunderwhichnewpubliclyfundedservicesshouldbemadeavailable,
includingtheeligiblepatientgroup,restrictionsontheprovider(e.g.tertiaryhospitalsonly)and/orthe
situationsinwhichthenewserviceshouldbeused(e.g.trialonly),
(iii)Selectivelyreviewingfundingforexistinginterventionstoidentifywhichshouldnolongerqualifyfor
publicfundingbasedontheireffectivenessandcost,and
(b)ThatwhenitispossibleforPharmactoassumeresponsibilityforanominalbudgetformedicaldevicesfrom
DHBs,thenPharmacshouldassumethesameresponsibilitiesandapplythesameprocessestothesedevices
asitcurrentlydoesforhospitalpharmaceuticals,
(c) AnewnationalprocurementagencyrecommendedinSection12below‘Shiftingresourcestothefront-line‘
shouldestablishaprocessforgraduallyassumingresponsibilityfromDHBsforthecollectiveprocurementof,
andmanagingthesupplychainfor,medicaldevicesusedinpublichospitalsthatarenotmanagedby
Pharmac,and
(d)ThescopeofMedsafe’sactivitiesbeextendedtocoverregulationofthesafetyofmedicaldevices,in
conjuctionwiththeTherapeuticGoodsAdministrationinAustralia.Giventhescarcityofregulatory
expertise,thiscouldinvolveaprocessforrecognisingtheregulatorydecisionsofsimilarjurisdictionsas
applicableinNewZealand,atleastinthefirstinstance.
6
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
4 The right service in the right place: changing service configuration
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheMinisterestablishapositivelistofnationalservicesthatwillbeplannedandfundedbytheNHBand
financedbytopslicingthePBFFcurrentlyallocatedtoDHBsforthatpurpose.TheNHBwouldthencontract
withaselectionofDHBstodeliverthesenationalservicesfortheentirecountry,
(b)TheNHBestablishatransparentprocessforadvisingtheMinisteraboutwhichservicescurrentlyplanned,
funded,andprovidedatthenational,regional,andlocallevelsshouldbeorganisedatadifferentlevelinfuture,
(c) DHBsberequiredtoproduceRSPsacrossawiderangeofservices.Theinitialplansshouldfocusonplanning
andfundingforvulnerableservicesaswellasthosewhoselonger-termclinicalandfinancialviabilityclearly
dependsonservicingalarger,regionalpopulation,
(d)DHBsbeaskedtodelegateauthoritytotheirChairsandCEOstomakedecisionsontheirbehalfatthe
regionallevelandwhowillbecometheregionalservice‘sgovernancebodyaccountableforthedevelopment
andimplementationoftheRSP,
(e) InthoserarecaseswhenDHBscannotagreeontheRSP,thesedisputesbeescalatedtotheNHBfor
resolutionandthatitidentifiesthemostclinicallyandfinanciallyviableoptionthatdeliversaqualityservice,
(f) TheNHBcontractonbehalfoftheMinisterwithDHBsforregionalandlocalserviceandplanning,and
delivery,andmonitorDHBperformance,thustakingthisfunctionoutoftheMinistry,
(g)Thatoverthenext12monthstheMinistrybeaskedtoworkthroughthevariouspolicyandmachineryof
governmentissuesassociatedwithdevolvingallofthe$2.5billionofNDEcurrentlymanagedbythe
MinistrytoeithertheNHB(nationallevel)orDHBs(regionalandlocallevel)andadvisetheGovernment
accorgingly(Annex4),and
(h)ThattheMinistryofHealth’srolefocusesincreasinglyonprovidingpolicyadvice,administrationof
regulations,monitoringtheNHB,andservicingtheMinister’soffice.
7
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
5 The right capacity for the future: making better investments
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TherolesandfunctionsascribedtotheNHBinthisreportwouldbetransferredtotheCHFA,whowould
operateastheNHB.TheMinisterwillneedtoreconsiderthecurrentmembershipoftheCHFABoardin
ordertoensurethatitisbestplacedtomanageitsnewrolesandfunctions.Aspartofthetransition
arrangements,atemporaryestablishmentboardmightbeappointedtomanagethetransition,and
(b)TheproposedNHBismaderesponsibleforcapacityplanningandfunding,includingworkforce,capital,and
IT.Detailedrecommendationsforaddressingthecapacityplanningissuesdiscussedinthissectionarefound
inAnnex3.
6 Shifting resources to the front-line
The MRG recommends:
(a) ThecreationofaPharmac-likenationalsharedserviceagencywithamandatetomanagetheassessment,
standardisation,management,purchasing,and/orsupplychainmanagementofanyofthecommonback
officefunctionsofDHBsthatarereferredtoitbytheMinisterofHealth(Annex4),and
(b)TheNHBberequiredto:
(i) EstablishaprocessforworkingthroughtheentirerangeofcommonDHBbackofficeservicestoidentifya
listofservicesthatarebestsuppliedbyasinglenationalprovider,startingwithnon-pharmaceuticalhospital
procurement(Annex4),and
(ii) Dependingonhowlongitwilltaketoestablishtheproposednationalsharedserviceagency,manage
theexistingthreesharedservicefunctionsthatweproposebeshiftedoutoftheMinistryandintothe
nationalagency(i.e.Healthpac,AuditandCompliance,HealthSystemReportingInformation).
7 Getting more from our public hospitals: improving hospital productivity
The MRG recommends that:
(a) DHBsberequiredtoidentifythetopthreeorfourproductivitymeasureseachyearthataremostimportant
tothemandreportprogressagainsttheimprovementtargetstheyhavesetforthemselves,and
(b)TheNHBshouldensurethat:
(i) Productivitymeasuresshouldbedevelopedforuseatsystemandhospitallevel.Theseshouldbe
developedbyacredible,expert,andindependentsource,and
(ii) Clinicalproductivitymeasuresshouldbedevelopedattheappropriatelevel,withstrongclinicalinput.
8
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
8 Further work
The MRG recommends that the Ministry report on 14.1 and 14.3 and within its first year of operation
the NHB:
(a) Reviewsthearrangementsfortheplanning,funding,andprovisionofnational,regional,andlocal
laboratoryandradiologicaldiagnosticserviceswithaviewtodeterminingtheoptimalplanning,funding,
andserviceconfigurationarrangementsforNewZealand,and
(b)ReportstotheMinisteronhowtobestaddresstheotherissuesraisedforfurtherworkinthissectionof
thereport.
9 Conclusion
The MRG recommends that, within three years, the Government:
(a) Seeksanassessmentoftheextenttowhichthepublichealthanddisabilitysectorislikelytobeableto
continueliftingperformancewithoutrequiringaneverlargershareofGDP,and
(b) IdentifiesthechangesintheNewZealandPublicHealthandDisabilityAct2000,orreplacementlegislation,
requiredtosimultaneouslysecurethesustainabilityandlifttheperformanceofthepublichealthand
disabilitysystemsoitisreadytointroducethesechangesifachangeinthelegislativeframeworkisdeemed
necessaryfollowingtheassessmentin(a)above.
9
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
Annex 2 Recommendations
1 Enhancing Clinical Leadership
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheNHBshoulddevelopaculturalchangeprogrammeaimedatenhancing:
(i) Recognitionofandsupportforhealthcareleaders,includingviaanannualleadershipawardprogramme
celebratingandshowcasingoutstandinghealthcareleadersfromallpartsofthesector,and
(ii)Theabilityofcliniciansandmanagerstoformproductivepartnerships,bothwithinthehospitalsector
andacrosssectors.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) DHBsshouldensurethatformalpositiondescriptionsareagreed,includingannualperformance
expectationsandleadershipperformancedevelopmentplansforeachformalclinicalleadershiprole,from
departmentaltoexecutivelevelineveryorganisation,and
(b)DHBsshouldensurethatclinicianstakingonfull-timeleadershiprolesareassuredonappointmentofformal
supportforreturntoclinicalpracticeattheconclusionoftheappointment.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) DHBsshouldensurethatformalclinicalleadershiprolesarerecognisedbytheallocationofsessionaltime
duringtheworkingweektofulfilltheirduties.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheMinistershouldseekadviceonhowbesttoencourageuniversitiesto:
(i) Furtherembedanddeveloptheacademicstatusofthedisciplineofclinicalleadership,supporting
researchinmulti-disciplinarymodelsandfurtherformalisingacademicachievementinthisarea,
includingviatheestablishmentofrelevantChairs,and
(ii) Ensureundergraduatecoursesinallhealthdisciplinestoincludeformalattentiontoleadership
developmentappropriatetoeachyearofthecurriculum,bothintheoryandinpractice.
10
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) DHBsshouldensurethatnewappointmentstoclinicalleadershippositionsreceiveapersonalised
assessmentofleadershipdevelopmentneeds,togetherwithsupportandtrainingtoanticipateand
understandenvironmentalfactorsandtheirconsequencesandtheopportunityformulti-disciplinary
leadershipskillsdevelopmentandmentoring,
(b)DHBsshouldensurethatapackageofresourcesfocusingonleadershipskillsandqualitiesisavailableto
supportcliniciansinleadershippositionsaspartofprofessionaldevelopmentprogrammes,toensureleaders
havethetoolstoworkacrosscontemporaryboundariestocollaboratetoachievethebestoutcomes,
(c) DHBsshouldconsiderincludingaformalrequirementforthreetosixmonthswithinasuitablementoring
partnershipforallnewappointmentstoleadershippositionsandallpromotions.Thementoringpartnership
shouldbedefinedbyformalisedexpectationsofbothpartnersandspecifiedoutcomes,andeducationand
trainingmadeavailabletothosenewtoofferingmentoringsupporttonewleaders,and
(d)DHBsshouldensurethatpotentialfutureleadersshowingearlypromiseareofferedopportunitiestodevelop
theirskillsandcompetenciesthroughinvolvementinperformanceimprovementinitiatives.
2 Initiatives to increase elective services and reduce patient waiting times, improve access
to timely primary and hospital services and improve productivity and quality of services
for patients
The MRG recommends that:
(a) PlanningwithinDHBstomeettheGovernment’selectivesurgerytargetsshouldbeledbycliniciansfromboththe
primaryandhospitalsectorsinpartnershipwithmanagerstoensureappropriateallocationofclinicalpriorities
betweenandwithinspecialtiesaswellascapabilitybetweenlocations,andensuresuitableclinicalprovisionisin
place.Intheoccasionalcasewhereagreementcannotbereachedwithinthespecifiedtimeframe,thematterwill
beelevatedtotheNationalhealthBoardfordecision,and
(c) DHBsshouldreviewlocalprimarycareaccesstoappropriatediagnosticstoensureappropriatedirect
accessismadeavailableinaplannedandevaluatedway,ensuringthatallservicedemandsarefairlyand
transparentlyprioritised.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Clinicalleadersshouldbesupportedtotrial,develop,andleadtheimplementationofnewscopes
ofpracticeandsupportingworkforcemodels.
11
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Anationalcampaign(ledfromthehighestlevel)beundertakenbytheMinistrytoexplainandpromote
agreednationalprioritisationtools.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) FurtherworkshouldbeundertakenbytheMinistrytopromoteexamplesofgoodpracticeinsupporting
primarycaretomanageunmetneedsandtoensureimplementationnationally.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheNHBshouldensurethat:
(i) Productivitymeasuresshouldbedevelopedforuseatsystemandhospitallevel.Theseshouldbedeveloped
byacredible,expert,andindependentsource,and
(ii) Clinicallevelproductivitymeasuresshouldbedevelopedatadepartmentalandclinicianlevelwithstrong
clinicalinput.
3 Ways to establish clinical networks and leadership programmes to support these goals
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Irrespectiveoftheirorigin,clinicalnetworksshould:
(i) Havecleartermsofreferenceandreportingarrangements,
(ii) Beledbyclinicianswithappropriatequalificationsandarecordofachievementinmanagement–
appointmentstoleadershippositionsshouldbeforafixedtermandholdersshouldmaintainsome
clinicalrole,
(iii) Normallyincluderepresentativesfromacrossthebreadthofhealthcareandincludeanexpectationof
aholisticapproachtorecommendations,
(iv)Includeregularmeasurementandreportingofoutcomesandoutputsintheirtermsofreferenceaswell
asassessmentforimpactinthelocalenvironment,
(v) Haveaclearplanofhowtheirqualityandprocessoutcomeswillbegiveneffect,
(vi)Expecttodisbandoncetheyhavefulfilledtheirobjectives,and
(b)Dedicatedprojectsupportshouldbeavailableforthosenetworksfulfillingtherequirementsaboveandwith
clearqualityandprocessoutcometargets,and
(c) Clinicalleaders,particularlyofthoseformalnationalnetworksestablishedbytheMinistryorNHBtomeet
programmedtasksanddefinedtimeframes,shouldhavearecognisedallocationoftimefortheroleand
theiremployerreimbursedtoenableback-fillingoftheposition.
12
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
4 Establishing and fostering greater clinical leadership in primary care and across
primary and hospital care within DHBs – primary and hospital integration
The MRG recommends that:
(a) PHOsshouldbeassessedfortheirlevelofpreparednessincludinggovernanceandmanagementcapability
andsupportinfrastructure,clinicalengagement,‘community’engagement,andthenoffereddelegated
budgetswithaccountabilityfor,andtakesomefinancialriskaround,deliveringqualityandfinancialoutcomes,
(b)Wherepracticableanddesiredbystakeholders,co-locationofPHOprimarycareservices,hospitaland
relatedNGOservicesshouldbeconsidered.ThismayincludethedevelopmentofIntegratedFamilyHealth
Centres,virtualconnectionsbetweenexistingentitiesorotherconfigurationsinvolvingallcomponentsof
primarycaredelivery,inapatient-centricmanner.Suchconceptswouldconstituteprimarycareclinicsmade
upofGPs,nurses,alliedhealthprofessionalandhospitalspecialists,
(c) DHBswillneedtoensurethatitisclearwhattheirfundingarmsareresponsibleforandwhatresponsibilities
andriskshavebeendelegatedtoPHOsaspartofanydelegatedfundingandrisksharingarrangemente.g.
inordertoavoidoverlaporcompetitionbetweenfunders,and
(d)DHBfundingofPHOsshouldbelessprescriptiveabouttyingfundingtoacertainworkforcemixandinstead
putagreaterfocusontheoutcometheyarelookingforandallowprimaryproviderstochoosethebestmix
oftheskillsofGPs,nurses,andnursepractitionersinmeetingthatoutcome.PHOsshouldmakemoreofthe
opportunitiestheyalreadyhavetoconsiderworkforcemix,newscopesofpracticeandusingspecialistsas
partoftheprimaryhealthcareteam.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) AnindependentnationalqualityentityshouldnowbeestablishedtoreplaceQICandwithresponsibilityfor
helpingprovidersacrossthewholesectorimprovepatientsafetyandservicequality.
5 The acceleration of national quality and safety improvement programmes
The MRG recommends that:
(a) AnindependentnationalqualityentityshouldnowbeestablishedtoreplaceQICandwithresponsibilityfor
helpingprovidersacrossthewholesectorimprovepatientsafetyandservicequality.
The MRG recommends that the national quality entity should:
(a) Establishformallinkageswithoneormoresimilarinternationalbodies,butmustconcentrateonseeding
andgrowingalocalsafetyandqualityculture,providingstateofthearttools,skillsandsupportand
buildingNewZealandcapability,
13
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
(b)Developthenextphaseofanationalqualityandsafetyprogrammethataddressespatientsafetyand
continuousqualityimprovement,and
(c) ScalebackthecurrentPHOPerformanceProgrammeforaperiodandtheresultingsavingshouldbeusedto
helpacceleratetheintroductionofQI4GP.
The MRG recommends that the national quality entity should:
(a) BegovernedbyanappointedboardandreporttotheMinister.Clinicalappointmentsonthisboardmustbe
drawnfromthebreadthofhealthcareproviders.
The MRG recommends that the national quality entity should:
(a) Expecttobecomepartiallyself-fundingbytheendofitsthirdyearofoperationthroughthedevelopmentof
resources,teachingandlearningopportunitiesandothersupportsforworkforcedevelopmentand
education,and
(b)Supportprospectiveresearchandrigorousevaluationtodemonstratethetransferabilityofrealcashsavings
fromimprovedsafetyandquality.
14
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
Annex 3 Recommendations
1 Capital expenditure
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheNCCshouldbereplacedbyasingleInvestmentCommitteeoftheNHB,
(b)TheInvestmentCommitteeshouldbeindependentlychairedanditsmembershipshouldincludeclinicians
andthechairsoftheNHB’sworkforceandITboards,
(c) Thereshouldalong-termcapitalandassetmanagementplanwithanannualcomponentthatoutlinestotal
capitalexpenditureinvestment,andthelevel,nature,andsourceofthefundingrequired,
(d)Theplansin(c)aboveshouldbedrivenbyservicedeliverymodelsofcarewithinlocal,regional,andnational
healthplans,
(e) Theplansin(c)aboveshouldhavestronglinkageswithworkforceandITdevelopmentandinvestmentplans,
(f) Theplansin(c)shouldincludeallproposals(includingallnon-departmentalproposalsbytheMinistry)that
exceedtheexistingcentralapprovalthresholds,withtheNHBreplacingtheMinistryintheapprovalprocess,
and
(g)TheissuesoutlinedinFurtherworkaboveshouldbeexplored.
2 Workforce
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheformationofaNationalHealthWorkforceBoard(NHWB)thatwillreporttotheNHB,
(b)TheNHWBwouldberesponsiblefor:
(i) Theplanning,developmentandimplementationofaNHWB,
(ii) Assessingfutureworkforceneeds,overseeingtheplanningandfundingofpostgraduatetraining(ifthe
recommendationsoftheMinisterialTaskforceontheFundingofHeathWorkforceTrainingareaccepted),
andadvisingtheMinisteronchangesinscopeofpracticeandworkforceinnovations,
(iii)WorkingwithDHBsindevelopinganindustrialrelationsstrategythathelpsfacilitatethechangesinwork
practicestosupportthesector’swiderobjectivesforworkforcedevelopment,and
(c) TheNHWBberepresentedontheNHBSingleInvestmentCommitteetoensurethereisstrongalignmentof
theworkforcewithnon-workforceinvestmentssuchasITandfacilities,and
(d)ThecurrentHWIPbemadeanationalresourceunderthegovernanceoftheNHWBandthattherespective
coveragebequicklyincreasedtoincludethewholehealthsectorworkforceandtodevelopaneffective
modelingcapability.
15
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
3 Information technology
The MRG recommends that:
(a) AninterimgovernancegroupbesetupforbothNSDPandKDtoreprioritiseandreducethenumberof
NSDPandKDprojectswithafocuson(a)addressingtherisksinthepaymentssystemand(b)supporting
theimplementationofthedistributedapproachtoasafesharingandtransferofpatientelectronic
informationamongstproviders,
(b)TheRefreshHISNZprojectofKDshouldceaseandtheSafeSharingofHealthInformationCommunityDialogue
andEducationprojectofKDshouldbeslimmeddownandutilisetheexistingHISACconsumerforum,
(c) AllprimarycarerelatedITprojectssuchasGPtoGPNotesTransfer,PHOPerformanceProgramme,Qi4GP,
electronicreferrals,electronicdischarges,electronicmedication,andelectroniclaboratoryshouldbe
integratedandrationalisedunderanewprimarycareinformationsysteminitiative,
(d)TheGrantsSchemeprojectofKDbereviewedtosupportprojectsrelatedtotheprimarycareinformation
systeminitiatives,
(e) ThePHOPerformanceProgrammebescaledbackandsavingsberedirectedtosupportthedevelopmentof
QI4GPaspartofabroaderprimarycareinformationsysteminitiative,
(f) Thattheinteroperableandconnecteddistributedapproachratherthanthesinglesector-wideenterprise
systembeconfirmedasthepreferredapproachforthedevelopmentofasafesharingandtransferof
patientelectronichealthinformationfortheNewZealandhealthsector,
(g)TheHMSCinitiativesbysevenDHBsrevisetheirscopetoconcentrateonreplacingthePASforhospitals.
Thisrevisedscopebeimplementedusingadistributedapproachforthedevelopmentofasafesharingand
transferofpatientelectronichealthinformation,usinginteroperabilitystandardssetbyHISOtoensure
integrationwithprimarycareandotherproviders’systems,
(h)TherolesandfunctionoftheMinistryofHealthIDbereviewedandfocusedsolelytosupporttheITneedsof
theMinistry,
(i) ThenationalpaymentsandcontractsmanagementsystemsprovidedbySectorServices(withabudgetof
272FTEs)shouldbemovedoutofIDtoanationalsharedserviceagency.Whileworkisbeingundertaken
toestablishthelegislationtosetupanationalsharedserviceagency,thisfunctionshouldbetransferredto
asingleNHBsubsidiary,
(j) AllothercurrentresponsibilitiesoftheMinistryIDbetransferredtotheNHB,
(k)ANationalHealthITBoardbesetupwithin,andreportto,theNHBandreplacethecurrentHISAC.This
boardwillprovideastrategicleadershiprolefornationalhealthITstrategyandplanningaswellas
governanceovernationalcollectionsandsystems,
16
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
(l) TheNationalHealthITBoardwill,onbehalfoftheNHB,workwiththesectortodevelopaNationalITPlan
(includinganationalITarchitectureframework)toadvanceHISNZ.Thisplanwillbearollingplanwithlocal,
regional,andnationalviews,andashort,intermediate,andlong-termperspectivethatitisalignedwiththe
NationalHealthWorkforcePlanandNationalHealthCapitalPlan,
(m)TheNationalHealthITBoardwillberepresentedontheNHBsingleInvestmentCommitteeresponsiblefor
planningandfundingITandfacilitiesprogrammes,
(n)TheNationalHealthITBoardwillensurethereisstrongsectorclinicalmanagerandgovernanceleadershipof
ITprojects,and
(o)TheNationalHealthITBoardwillworkcloselywiththeHSMCinitiativeandtheproposedprimarycare
informationsysteminitiativetoadvance:
(i) Theimplementationofasafe,sharedandtransferablepatientelectronichealthrecordforNewZealand
healthsector,usingadistributedapproachbasedoninteroperabilitystandardssetbytheHISO,and
(ii) Theimplementationofaconsumerportal.
17
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
Annex 4 Recommendations
1 Testing the line-by-line spending review with the Ministry to identify any additional
in-depth reviews or longer-term work that will need to be addressed
With respect to NDE managed by the Ministry, in addition to the recommendations in the main paper,
the MRG recommends that:
(a) Allnewexpenditureproposalsshouldbeaccompaniedbyathree-yearforecastofthemostlikelyfullfuture
costoftheproposal,anassessmentoftheproposal’scost-effectiveness,andanindicationofsavingsthat
couldbereleasedfromlowpriorityexpenditureelsewhereinVoteHealthtofundtheproposal,and
(b)TheresultsoftheongoingprogrammethattheDirectorGeneralhasforseekingsavingsinkeyareasinboth
departmentalexpenditureandNDEbesubjecttoindependentexpertreviewforrelativelylargeareasof
expenditureandbecompletedbeforetheassociatedfundingfunctionisshiftedoutoftheMinistry.
2 Consideration of the Ministry’s role as a manager of a range of national operational
functions
With respect to the longer-term management of the $2.5 billion of NDE managed by the Ministry, the
MRG recommends that:
(a) Overthenext12monthstheMinistrybeaskedtoworkthroughthevariouspolicyandmachinery
ofgovernmentissuesassociatedwithdevolvingallofthe$2.5billionofNDEcurrentlymanagedbythe
MinistrytoeithertheNHB(nationallevel)orDHBs(regionalandlocallevel),
(b)ThefundingstreamsthatarerelativelystraightforwardtomoveoutoftheMinistrybeforethe12month
periodshouldbemoved,and
(c) Unlessunanticipatedissuesarise,allofthisfundingandtheassociatedbudgettomanagethatfunding
shouldhavebeenshiftedoutoftheMinistryattheendofthisperiod.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheHeathpac(SectorServices–InformationDirectorate)bemovedoutoftheMinistrytobecomepartof
theproposednewnationalsharedservicesagency,probablyoperatingasasubsidiarywithitsown
governancestructure.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) AuditandCompliancebecomeapartoftheproposedHeathpacsubsidiaryofthenewsharedservices
organisation,withaninternalauditfunctionanddirectaccountabilitytotheboardthatisindependentof
management.
18
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) MedSafemaintainitscurrentstatusuntiltheTherapeuticProductsandMedicinesBillispassedandit
becomespartoftheANZTPA.Inthemeantime,itwouldmakesensetoensurethatlegislationallowed
MedSafetosetfeestoensurecostrecovery.WealsorecommendthattheGovernmentstronglysupports
MedsafemanagingtheNZULMwhenitiscomplete,andconsidersexpandingthescopeofMedSafeto
includetheregulationofmedicaldevices.
The MRG recommends that, with respect to the NRL:
(a) TheNRLremainasanindependentunitwithintheMinistryofHealthinthefirstinstance,
(b)TheMinistryofHealthactstoincreasethecommercialflexibilityoftheNRL,withintheconstraintsof
operatingwithintheMinistry,and
(c) TheMinisterofHealthconsiderstheopportunityprovidedbythenewRadiationSafetyBilltoinvestigatethe
‘onestopshop‘optionforscientificservicesunderpinningthepublichealthservice.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheMinistryofHealthbeaskedtoconsideriftheNSUshouldremainanationalserviceandbemovedto
theNHB,orifitisbettertodevolveitsfunctionstoDHBstomanageeitherregionallyorlocally.Unless
unanticipatedissuesarise,thisshouldbeconcludedinthe12monthtimeframeformovingNDE.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TherepositoriesanddatabasescurrentlymaintainedbythevariousMinistryDirectoratesbemovedintothe
proposednewnationalsharedserviceagency,probablyoperatingasasubsidiarywithitsowngovernance
structure.
3 Selectively reviewing the rest-of -sector expenditure, including DHBs, to reduce waste and
bureaucracy and improve spending quality and patient service
The MRG recommends that:
(a)ThemanagementfeepaidtoPHOswithenrolledpopulationsoflessthan40,000bereducedandsome
oftheresultingsavingsbeusedoverthesubsequentyeartohelpthosePHOsamalgamate,confederate,
orenterintootherarrangementsforsharingmanagementoverheads,
(b)DHBsbeadvisedthatbarrierswhichrestricttheabilityofGPstoleaveorjoinaPHOshouldbeabolished,
and
(c) DHBsbeadvisedthatnewPHOsshouldbepermitted,onconditionthat:
(i)establishmentfundingisnotprovided
(ii)thatitisthepreferenceofhealthcareproviders,and
(iii)soundcorporategovernance,soundclinicalgovernance,andeffectivecommunityparticipationis
demonstrated.
19
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends:
(a) ThecreationofaPharmac-likenationalsharedserviceagencywithamandatetomanagetheassessment,
standardisation,management,purchasing,and/orsupplychainmanagementofanyofthecommonback
officefunctionsofDHBsthatarereferredtoitbytheMinisterofHealth,
(b)Theoperationalbudgetofthisagencybefundedbytop-slicingtheDHBfundingformula,
(c) ThatthisagencywillactasanagentforDHBsandwillagreewiththemanotional(oractual)budgetforthe
management,purchasing,and/orsupplychainmanagementtasksitundertakesontheirbehalf,
(d)Aslongasabudgetcanbeidentified,thentheboardofthisagencywillmakethefinaldecisiononwhatis
purchasedandtheterms,conditions,andpricesofprocureditemsandthemanagementofsharedservices
(likepayrollandsupplychain),and
(e) ThattheNHBberequiredtoestablishaprocessforworkingthroughtheentirerangeofcommonDHBback
officeservicestoidentifyalistofservicesthatarebestsuppliedbyasinglenationalprovider,startingwith
non-pharmaceuticalhospitalprocurement.
4 Review the reporting and accountability processes between the Ministry, DHBs and PHOs
to improve focus and reduce unnecessary bureaucracy
The MRG recommends that:
(a) WithrespecttotheNationalCollectionAnnualMaintenanceProgramme,thereisconsultationbetweenthe
DHB’spatientmanagementsystemvendorsandothersectorstakeholdersearlierintheprocess(October)
ratherthanwaitinguntillateDecember.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) DHBsarecleareraboutwhatisneededforpayments(versusmonitoringcontractperformance)andthat
paymentmethodsaresimplifiedinordertoreducethecostandcomplexityofthepaymentssystem.
The MRG recommends that a:
(a) Workingpartyisestablishedwitharangeofsectorrepresentativestodevelopanationalframeworkfor
contracting,reportingandaccountabilitythatstreamlinesprocessesandensuresclear,timelyaccountability
e.g.toaligntheDAPandSOIreporting,toinvestigatehowthecertificationandexceptionbasiscanbeused
morewidely,andtoagreetheprocessforidentifyingkeyIDPreportingrequirements,andtodevelopthe
DAPintoanaction-orientateddocumentthatismorerelevanttoDHBprioritiesandperformance.
20
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
5 Selectively review the plethora of existing Ministerial and Ministry committees and
functions.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Fourcommitteeshavetheirtermsofreferenceandmembershiprefocusedtofulfilthenewmandate
outlinedintheMRGreport,
(b)16committeesbedisbanded,
(c) 16committeesbedisbandedandtheirfunctionstransferredtotheNHB,
(d)Sevencommitteesbemerged,
(e) FivecommitteesbereconfiguredintoExpertPanelsasoutlinedintheFrameworkinSection3,and
(f) 54committeesareretained.Ofthese10areStatutoryCommittees,fourareMinisterialCommittees,and40
areMinistryofHealthCommittees(including10NSUandeightEthicsCommittees).
The MRG recommends the following principles govern all committees, including Statutory, Ministerial
Advisory, Ministry of Health, and NHB:
(a) FormalMinistryofHealthCommittees(Programme/ProjectAdvisorGroups)shouldonlybeestablishedon
approvaloftheSeniorLeadershipTeam,
(b)Programme/ProjectAdvisoryCommitteesmaybeestablishedfortheplanningandinitialimplementationof
aspecificprogramme/project.Howeverwhereongoingadvicefromexpertisenotavailablewithinthe
MinistryofHealthisrequired,existingnetworksshouldbeutlisedfirsttoinformpolicyandprogramme
development,especiallyforcontentiousorcomplexissuesorthosewheresectorsupportisrequired,
(c) AllcommitteesandExpertPanelsshouldhavearobusttermsofreference,aworkplan,andreporting
requirements,
(d)AllcommitteesshouldhaveanindependentlyappointedskilledChair,whoseroleisnottorepresentan
opinionbuttoensurethecommitteefulfilsitsresponsibilities,
(e) AllcommitteesandExpertPanelsshouldconsiderhowtheyincludeconsumervoicesin
theirprocesses,
(f) AllcommitteesandExpertPanelstouseteleconferenceasthepreferredmethodofmeeting
wheneverpossible,
(g)Allcommitteestohaveanindependentreviewoftheirtermsofreference,deliveryagainsttheworkplan,
andmembershiptoensuretheycontinuetoaddvalueand/orbenefittothesector,and
(h)AllMinistryofHealthcommitteestohaveanend-of-lifedate.
21
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Thestructurebelowisendorsedforthefuture.
PHOs stratified by population size
Statutory Committees
Ministerial Advisory Committees
MoH and NHB Programme/Project Advisory Groups
MoH and NHB Expert Panel
Rationale for existence
Term of office
Established by an Act of Parliament
To provide advice to the Minister of Health on specific issues
The expertise required is not employed within the Ministry of Health; and/or
Existing networks do not have the full required expertise; and/or
There is a requirement for long-term expert advice
When expertise and input is required for a specific topic or piece of work
Drawn from the service panel of experts (see below)
Three years or less Three years or less One year or more Short-term focused work then disbanded; or called together as required to fulfil a specific agenda
Renewal As Minister of Health directs after the three- year review
As Minister of Health directs after the three-year review
As approved by the MoH Senior Leadership Team
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheMinistryofHealthestablishacommontermsofreferencetemplate,and
(b)ThattheMinistryofHealthdevelopasetofguidelinesfortheregulationandmonitoringofcommitteesand
ExpertPanels.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) ThattheMinistryofHealthimplementafullcostprocessforeverycommitteeandExpertPanel.
22
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheNationalHealthCommitteeberefocusedwithabroadermandatetoadvisetheMinisteronservicesthat
shouldbepublicallyfunded,
(b)ThePublicHealthAdvisoryCommitteeberefocusedwithabroadermandatetoadvisetheMinisteronthe
configurationandprovisionofpublichealthservices,
(c) TheNationalHealthEpidemiologyandQualityAssuranceAdvisoryCommittee,knownastheQuality
ImprovementCommittee(QIC),bereplacedbyanindependentqualityentitywithresponsibilityforhelping
providersacrossthewholesectorimprovepatientsafetyandservicequality,
(d)ThefourMortalityReviewCommitteesaremergedintotwocommittees,
(e) TheDrinkingWaterImplementationAdvisoryCommitteeisnotestablished,
(f) TheHealthInformationStrategyAdvisoryCommitteebedisbandedandbecomespartoftheNHBITcapacity
planningmechanism,and
(g)10StatutoryCommitteesareretained,eachtohaveaprocessestablishedforthree-yearlyreviewoftheir
termsofreferenceandmembershiptoensuretheycontinuetoaddvalueand/orbenefitfortheMinister.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheCancerControlCouncilofNewZealandberetainedandtherecommendationsofthereviewofthe
termsofreferenceandmembershipareimplemented,
(b)TheSanitaryWorksTechnicalAdvisoryCommitteeberetainedandisrefocusedontheDrinkingWater
AssistanceProgrammeonlyandmeetsonceperannum,
(c) TheHealthofOlderPeopleForumisdisbandedinitscurrentform,and
(d)Thethreeothercommitteesareretained,eachtohaveaprocessestablishedforthree-yearlyreviewoftheir
termsofreferenceandmembershiptoensuretheycontinuetoaddvalueand/orbenefitfortheMinister.
The MRG notes that 12 committees have already been reformulated into Expert Panels and
recommends that:
(a) TheNSUcommittees,includingtheJointMinistriesCommitteeandtheExpertPanels,continue
tobereviewedannuallytoensuretheyareaddingvaluetotheNSUprogrammes.
23
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheNationalSystemsDevelopmentProgrammeSectorAdvisoryGroupandtheNationalSystems
DevelopmentProgrammeConnectedHealthCommunitySteeringGrouparedisbanded,and
(b)TheHealthInformationStandardsGovernanceGroupbedisbandedandbecomespartoftheNHBIT
capacityplanningmechanism.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Sixofthecurrentworkforcecommittees’rolesandfunctionsbecomeastandingfeatureofeitherthe
NursingReferenceGrouportheMedicalReferenceGroupinthehealthworkforcecapacityandplanning
capabilityoftheNHB,and
(b)TheSpecificationReviewofMidwiferyFirstYearofPracticeAdvisoryGroupandtheMidwiferyPost
GraduateEducationExpertAdvisoryGroupbedisbandedandtheirfunctionslefttotheMidwifery
RegistrationBoard.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheoperationalandcommitteefunctionsoftheNationalInfluenzaStrategyGroupbeseparatedandthe
structureandfunctionofthecommitteebereviewedonce2009influenzavaccinationprogrammesare
completed,
(b)AnoverarchingImmunisationTechnicalForumandanImmunisationCoverageForumbeformedto
incorporatethecurrentrolesoftheImmunisationTechnicalWorkingGroup,theMenzBEffectiveness
Group,andtheImmunisationProgrammeAdvisoryCommittee,and
(c) Theneedforonefurthercommittee(theNationalImmunisationRegisterAdvisoryGroup)bereviewedas
partofareviewoftheinternalarrangementsrequiredtomeetresearch,privacy,andethicalneeds.
Oftheremainingsix,theMRGrecommendsthat:
(a) Fivecommittees(theHepatitisCTreatmentAdvisoryGroup,theAIDSMedicalandTechnicalAdvisory
Committee,theAntibioticResistanceAdvisoryCommittee,theNationalCertificationCommitteeforthe
EradicationofPolio,andtheTuberculosisAdvisoryGroup)beretained,and
(b)ThetermsofreferenceandmembershipofthePneumococcalSurveillanceAdvisoryGroupbereviewedwith
aviewtoabroaderroleinvaccinepreventablediseasesurveillance.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) ThoserecommendationsfromthereviewoftheEthicsSystempertainingtocommitteestructureandrole
areimplementedinatimelymanner.
24
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) ThethreeCoreCancerControlCommitteesareretainedandreviewedannuallytoensuretheycontinueto
addvaluetotheCancerControlStrategy.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Beforethetwo-yeartermiscompletethePrimaryHealthCareAdvisoryCouncilhasanindependentreview
oftheirtermsofreference,deliveryagainstworkplan,andmembershiptoevaluatethevalueand/orbenefit
tothesectorfromthecommitteestructureandprocess,and
(b)ThefunctionsofthePrimaryHealthCareNursingExpertAdvisoryGroupbeassumedbytheNursing
ReferenceGroupoftheHWTB.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) ThethreecommonFinanceRelatedCommitteesaredisbandedandthefunctionsmoveintotheNHBrole,and
(b)TheNationalCapitalCommitteebedisbandedandbecomepartoftheNHBcapitalcapacity
planningmechanism.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheTeTaumataRoopu–MaoriPublicHealthReferenceGroupberetainedandthatitsmembershipand
termsofreferencebereviewedannuallytoensureitaddsmaximumvalueforpublichealthservices.
Of the other three, the MRG recommends one is retained and that:
(a) TheFoodandBeverageClassificationSystemTechnicalAdvisoryGroupandtheNationalBreastfeeding
CommitteearereconfiguredasExpertPanelsandcalledtogetherasrequiredforspecificissues.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheMinistryofHealthworkwiththeCancerControlCouncilandtheHealthSponsorshipCounciltoremove
anyduplicationofworkplan,and
(b)TheMinistryofHealthreviewstherequirementfortheTobaccoControlResearchSteeringGrouppriorto
thenextcontractbeinglet.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheNationalDiabetesRetinalScreeningAdvisoryGroupisdisbanded.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) Thethirdiscurrentlyretained.
25
Annex 6: RECOMMENDATIONS
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheworkforcedevelopmentcomponentoftheHealthProtectionAdvisoryGroupistransferredtotheNHB
HealthWorkforcecapacityplanningfunctionandthatthecommitteemeetsuptotwiceyearlytofulfilits
assessmentprocess.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheJointMinistryofHealth/DepartmentofInternalAffairsStakeholderReferenceGrouponPreventingand
MinimisingGamblingHarmbereviewedand/ordisbandedattheendofitsterm.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) TheSexualHealthAdvisoryGroupbedisbanded.
The MRG recommends that:
(a) BoththeNationwideServiceFrameworkCo-ordinatingGroupandtheHealthImpactAssessmentSupport
UnitReferenceGroupbereformulatedintoExpertPanels,
(b)TheDHBInformationLiaisonGroupbedisbandedandthemonitoringfunctionsbecometheresponsibilityof
theNHB,and
(c) TheNationalServiceandTechnologyReview(NSTR)Committee’srolebecomesafunctionofthe
reformulatedNationalHealthCommittee.