anna-aip

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINESREGION III - CENTRAL LUZON

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE ANAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2015

PROGRAMS/PROJECT PHYSICAL OUTPUT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2014 ACCOMPLISHENT 2015 ANNUAL TARGETPHYSICAL TARGETS

MOV'sRESOURCE REQUIREMENT FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT

QUARTER 1 QUARTER 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4MATERIALS EQUIPMENT HUMAN Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY

100% 180 20 19 19 19 16 18 14 18 18 19 Office Supplies Laptop Teacher 150 50 200 150 550

100% 95% of learners 100% 95% 100% 95% 90% 95% 90% 90% 95% 100% Report card Laptop, Printer Teacher, Adviser 70 70 70 70 280

100% ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Attendance Sheet/SF 2 Teachers/Adviser 50 50 50 50 200

4 4 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Office Supplies Teacher 80 40 40 40 200

100% 100% ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� All School Forms Teacher/ Adviser 30 30 30 30 120

100% 100% ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� 50 50 50 50 200

4 4 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Teacher/ Adviser 50 50 50 50 200

TOTAL AMOUNT OTHER( INSET

REG. , DONATION etc).

TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS

DAILY LESSON PLAN AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

NO. OF PREPARED DAILY LESSON PLANS AND DAILY LOGS OF

ACTIVITIES INCLUDING APPROPRIATE, ADEQUATE AND

UPDATED INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS WITHIN THE RATING

PERIOD.

UPDATED LESSON PLAN / DAILY LESSON

LOG

CLASS RULES AND WELL BEHAVED STUDENTS

INITIATED DISCIPLINE OF STUDENTS INCLUDING CLASSROOM RULES ,

GUIDELINES ,INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP TASK WITHIN RATING

PERIOD

Form 138 (Report on Learner's Observed

Values)

POSITIVE/ PRODUCTIVE/ SAFE

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

MONITORED ATTENDANCE, DIVERSITY,SAFE, POSITIVE AND MOTIVATING ENVIRONMENT,

CLEANLINESS AND ORDERLINESS OF CLASSROOMS INCLUDING PROPER WASTE DISPOSAL.

100% of students' attendance monitored

Bond Paper, Ballpen,

Correction TapeComputer,

Printer

STUDENTS OUTCOMES

COMPLETE AND ACCURATE CLASS RECORD

MONITORED AND EVALUATED STUDENTS PROGRESS WITH

IN THE RATING PERIODClass Record/ Grading Sheet

Computer, Printer

UPDATED STUDENTS' SCHOOL RECORDS

MAINTAINED UPDATED STUDENTS' SCHOOL FORMS

Ballpen, Correction Tape

Computer, Printer

STUDENTS' MASTERY OF REQUIRED LEARNING

COMPETENCIES PER GRADE LEVEL

ATTAINED THE REQUIRED GSA FOR GRADE LEVEL AND

LEARNINGAREASForm 138, Form 137,

and SF 5Bond Paper,


Computer, Printer

Teacher/ Principal

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

PTA MEETINGS/ CONFERENCES ORGANIZED

CONDUCT PERIODIC PTA MEETINGS /CONFERENCES

Attendance Sheet, Minutes of the

meeting, Pictures


Correction TapeLaptop, Printer,

camera

4 4 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Teacher/ Adviser 50 50 50 50 200

HOME VISITATION CONDUCTED 8 8 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Teacher/ Adviser 70 70 70 70 280

2 2 ̸� ̸� Bond Paper

ACTION RESEARCH 0 1 ̸� Action Reasearch 150 150 300

0 1 ̸� Membership Card Teacher 130 130

PUBLISHED WORKS 0 1 ̸� Article Laptop, Printer Teacher 100 100

Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by:

LEONARDO D. CONDE MARYLENE I. ANTALAN, Ed. D.ANNA ROSE C. ENRIQUEZ Master Teacher I Sec. Sch. Principal II

Teacher I





meeting, Pictures



camera

VISITED PARENTS OF STUDENTS NEEDING ACADEMIC

MONITORING/FOLLOW-UP WITHIN THE RATING PERIOD

Request Letter from Principal, Agreement

set,and PicturesBond Paper,

BallpenLaptop, Printer,

camera

PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES INITIATED/

UNDERTAKEN

NO. OF UNDERTAKEN/ INITIATED PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES

WITH EXTERNAL FUNDING/SPONSORSHIP WITHIN

THE TARGET DATE

Acknowldgemnent receipt, Pictures

Laptop, Printer, camera

Teacher, Property

Custodian

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

NO. OF CONDUCT PROBLEM/CLASS ROOM BASED

ACTION RESEARCH

Bond paper, Ballpen

Laptop, Printer, Camera

Teacher, Principal

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP AND/OR COMMUNITY LINKAGES

NO. OF INITIATED /PARTICIPATED IN CO-CURRICULAR /SCHOOL

ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE RATING PERIOD

Ballpen,ID Picture

NO. OF PRODUCED PUBLICATION /CREATIVE WORK FOR SCHOOL PAPER/DIVISION

PUBLICATION WITHIN THE TARGET DATE

Bond paper, ballpen

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: ANNA ROSE C. ENRIQUEZ Name of Rater: LEONARDO D. CONDEPosition: Teacher I Position: MASTER TEACHER IReview Period: Date of Review:Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency,Timelines) RATING SCORE*

30% 5 - Outstanding • All daily lesson plans had the following objective,

subject matter,procedures, evaluation and assignment

• Each part had a full description of what to do with an example• Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented and time-bound• 130% and above developed high order thinking skills• Attained 130% and above of the desired learning competencies• 130% and above based on the budget of work4 - Very Satisfactory• Had four of the five parts of lesson plan• Each part of the partial description of what to do with an example• Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing• 115-129% developed high order thinking skills• Attained 115-129% of the desired learning competencies• 115-129% based on the approved budget of work3 - Satisfactory• Had 3 of the five parts• Each part had a partial description with out example• Objectives was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicator missing

Weight per KRA

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO: 2 BASIC

EDUCATION SERVICES

Teaching-Learning Process

• Prepared lesson plans and daily logs of activities including appropriate adequate and updated instructional materials with in the rating period

June 2015 to April 2016

30%

• 100-114% develop high order thinking skills• Attained 100-114% of the desired learning competencies• 100-114% based on the approved budget of work2 - Unsatisfactory• Had 2 of the five parts• Each part had no description with out example• Objectives was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicator missing• 51-99% develop high order thinking skills• Attained 51-99% of the desired learning competencies• 51-99% based on the approved budget of work1 - Poor• Had 1 of the five parts• Each part had no description with out example• Objectives was stated without behavioral indicator m• 50% and below develop high order thinking skills• 50% and below attained the desired learning competencies• 50% and below based on the approved budget of work5 - Outstanding • Pupils were 130% and the above guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal4 - Very Satisfactory• Pupils were 115-129% guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal3 - Satisfactory• Pupils were 100-114% guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal2 - Unsatisfactory• Pupils were 51-99% guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal1 - Poor• Pupils were not guided in the observation of classroom

MFO: 2 BASIC

EDUCATION SERVICES




• Initiated discipline of students including classroom rules, guidelines and individual and group task with in the rating period


30%

rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal5 - Outstanding • Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 130% and above maintained• Attendance checking was 130% and above systematically carried out4 - Very Satisfactory• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 115-129% maintained• Attendance checking was 115-129% systematically carried out3 - Satisfactory• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 100-114% maintained• Attendance checking was 100-114% systematically carried out2 - Unsatisfactory• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 51-99% maintained• Attendance checking was 51-99% systematically carried out1 - Poor• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 50% and below consistently maintained• Attendance checking was 50% and below systematically carried out

•Student Outcomes 30% 5 - Outstanding • Evidence showed that the teacher purposely plans assessments and varies assessment choices to match the different student needs, abilities, and learning styles.• Class record reflected the bases of 130% and above of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 130% and above of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 130% and above prepared for tests that require it

MFO: 2 BASIC

EDUCATION SERVICES




• Monitored attendance, diversity and appreciation, safe, positive and motivating environment, overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness and orderliness of classrooms including proper waste disposal daily


• Monitored and evaluated and maintained students' progress with in the rating period


•Student Outcomes 30%

• Table of specifications showed 130% and above

congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were 130% and above logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 130% and above administered in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)4 - Very Satisfactory• The teacher explained the various uses and limitations of the different kinds of assessments/test. Evidence showed that student needs and avenues for growth were clearly identified.• Class record reflected the bases of 115-129% of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 115-129% of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 115-129% prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications showed 115-129% congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were 115-129% logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 115-129% administered in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)3 - Satisfactory• The evidence of more than one measure of student performance but there is difficulty in analyzing data to

inform instuctional planning and delivery• Class record reflected the bases of 100-114% of pupils' ratings in all classes/subject area• Students' portfolio contained 100-114% of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 100-114% prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications showed 100-114% congruence between content and skills tested• Test questions were 100-114% logically sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 100-114% administered in all




classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on

subject area per class/grade level)2 - Unsatisfactory• The teacher planned instructions without analyzing student learning data• Class record reflected the bases of 51-99% of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 51-99% of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 51-99%prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications showed 51-99% congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were 51-99% logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 51-99% administered in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)1 - Poor• No evidence of student monitoring or evaluation of student progress• Class record reflected the bases of 50% and below of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 50% and below of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is not prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications did not show congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were not logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were never administered5 - Outstanding • 130% and above updated students' school records4 - Very Satisfactory• 115-129% updated students' school records3 - Satisfactory• 100-114% updated students' school records2 - Unsatisfactory



• Maintained updated students' school forms



• 51-99% updated students' school records

1 - Poor• 50% and below updatedd students' school records

Once a year 5 - Outstanding 130% and above MPS/GSA4 - Very Satisfactory115%-129% MPS/ GSA3 - Satisfactory100-114% MPS/GSA2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% MPS/GSA1 - Poor50% and below MPS/GSA

30% 5 - Outstanding 130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met4 - Very Satisfactory115-129% of planned meetings producing only set agreements and partial accomplishments of these3 - Satisfactory100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results1 - Poor50% and below of the planned meetings conducted with no result5 - Outstanding 130% and above accomplishment of set visits successful interventions4 - Very Satisfactory115-129% accomplishment of visits with partial success in implementation of interventions3 - Satisfactory100-114% accomplishment of visits with suggested planned interventions2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% accomplishments of visits with planned interventions



• Attained the required GSA for grade level and learning areas

MFO: 1 BASIC EDUCATION POLICY SERVICES

• Community Involvement

• Conducted periodic PTA meetings/ conferences

Once every grading period

• Visited parents of students needing academic monitoring/ follow-up with in the rating period

Twice every quarter

30%

1 - Poor

50% and below accomplishments with no interventionsTwice a year 5 - Outstanding 130% and above project accomplishment with full documentation

report on completion4 - Very Satisfactory115-129% project accomplishment with partial completion3 - Satisfactory100-114% project initiative only with no completion report2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% project initiative only with no completion report1 - PoorNo project/event/activity initiated

Once 10% 5 - Outstanding 3 action research conducted with full documentation on completion of interventions.4 - Very Satisfactory2 action research conducted with full documentation on completion of interventions.3 - Satisfactory1 action research conducted with full documentation on completion of interventions.2 - UnsatisfactoryIdentified classroom/learning problems with research proposals1 - PoorOnly classroom/learning/issues identified

June to May 5 - Outstanding Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with documented results4 - Very SatisfactoryInitiated and participated in co-curricular/ school activities with documented results3 - SatisfactoryParticipated in most co-curricular/ school activities with documented results2 - UnsatisfactoryParticipation only with out document results




Twice every quarter

• Undertaken/ initiated projects/events/activities with external funding/ sponsorship within the target date

MFO: 2 BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

• Professional Growth and Development

• Conducted problem/ classroom based action research

• Initiated/ Participated in co-curricular/school activities with in the rating period

June to May

10%

1 - Poor

No participation in school ActivitiesFebruary 5 - Outstanding Produced publication/creative work published in National

Circulation/ DepEd Post/ CSC Newsletters and similar publications4 - Very SatisfactoryProduced publication/creative work published in regional publications3 - SatisfactoryProduced publication/creative work published in division

publications2 - UnsatisfactoryProduced publication/creative work published in school papers1 - PoorUnpublished work produced

* Toget the score, the rating is multiplied by th weight assigned 0 0

0 LEONARDO D. CONDERatee Rater




• Produced publications/ creative work for school paper/division publication with in the target date

OVERAL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINESREGION III - CENTRAL LUZON

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TARLAC PROVINCE ANAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2015

PROGRAMS/PROJECT PHYSICAL OUTPUT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2014 ACCOMPLISHENT 2015 ANNUAL TARGETPHYSICAL TARGETS

MOV'sRESOURCE REQUIREMENT FINANCIAL REQUIREMENT

QUARTER 1 QUARTER 2 QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4MATERIALS EQUIPMENT HUMAN Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY

100% 180 20 19 19 19 16 18 14 18 18 19 Office Supplies Laptop Teacher 150 50 200 150 550

100% 95% of learners 100% 95% 100% 95% 90% 95% 90% 90% 95% 100% Report card Laptop, Printer Teacher, Adviser 70 70 70 70 280

100% ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Attendance Sheet/SF 2 Teachers/Adviser 50 50 50 50 200

4 4 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Office Supplies Teacher 80 40 40 40 200

100% 100% ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� All School Forms Teacher/ Adviser 30 30 30 30 120

100% 100% ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� 50 50 50 50 200

4 4 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Teacher/ Adviser 50 50 50 50 200

TOTAL AMOUNT OTHER( INSET

REG. , DONATION etc).

TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS

DAILY LESSON PLAN AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

NO. OF PREPARED DAILY LESSON PLANS AND DAILY LOGS OF

ACTIVITIES INCLUDING APPROPRIATE, ADEQUATE AND

UPDATED INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS WITHIN THE RATING

PERIOD.

UPDATED LESSON PLAN / DAILY LESSON

LOG

CLASS RULES AND WELL BEHAVED STUDENTS

INITIATED DISCIPLINE OF STUDENTS INCLUDING CLASSROOM RULES ,

GUIDELINES ,INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP TASK WITHIN RATING

PERIOD

Form 138 (Report on Learner's Observed

Values)

POSITIVE/ PRODUCTIVE/ SAFE

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

MONITORED ATTENDANCE, DIVERSITY,SAFE, POSITIVE AND MOTIVATING ENVIRONMENT,

CLEANLINESS AND ORDERLINESS OF CLASSROOMS INCLUDING PROPER WASTE DISPOSAL.

100% of students' attendance monitored


Correction TapeComputer,

Printer

STUDENTS OUTCOMES

COMPLETE AND ACCURATE CLASS RECORD

MONITORED AND EVALUATED STUDENTS PROGRESS WITH

IN THE RATING PERIODClass Record/ Grading Sheet

Computer, Printer

UPDATED STUDENTS' SCHOOL RECORDS

MAINTAINED UPDATED STUDENTS' SCHOOL FORMS


Computer, Printer

STUDENTS' MASTERY OF REQUIRED LEARNING

COMPETENCIES PER GRADE LEVEL

ATTAINED THE REQUIRED GSA FOR GRADE LEVEL AND

LEARNINGAREASForm 138, Form 137,

and SF 5Bond Paper,


Computer, Printer

Teacher/ Principal





meeting, Pictures



camera

4 4 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Teacher/ Adviser 50 50 50 50 200

HOME VISITATION CONDUCTED 8 8 ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� ̸� Teacher/ Adviser 70 70 70 70 280

2 2 ̸� ̸� Bond Paper

ACTION RESEARCH 0 1 ̸� Action Reasearch 150 150 300

0 1 ̸� Membership Card Teacher 130 130

PUBLISHED WORKS 0 1 ̸� Article Laptop, Printer Teacher 100 100

Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by:

LEONARDO D. CONDE MARYLENE I. ANTALAN, Ed. D.JACQUELINE P. BENAVIDES Master Teacher I Sec. Sch. Principal II

Teacher I





meeting, Pictures



camera

VISITED PARENTS OF STUDENTS NEEDING ACADEMIC

MONITORING/FOLLOW-UP WITHIN THE RATING PERIOD

Request Letter from Principal, Agreement

set,and PicturesBond Paper,

BallpenLaptop, Printer,

camera

PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES INITIATED/

UNDERTAKEN

NO. OF UNDERTAKEN/ INITIATED PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES

WITH EXTERNAL FUNDING/SPONSORSHIP WITHIN

THE TARGET DATE

Acknowldgemnent receipt, Pictures

Laptop, Printer, camera

Teacher, Property

Custodian

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

NO. OF CONDUCT PROBLEM/CLASS ROOM BASED

ACTION RESEARCH

Bond paper, Ballpen

Laptop, Printer, Camera

Teacher, Principal

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP AND/OR COMMUNITY LINKAGES

NO. OF INITIATED /PARTICIPATED IN CO-CURRICULAR /SCHOOL

ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE RATING PERIOD

Ballpen,ID Picture

NO. OF PRODUCED PUBLICATION /CREATIVE WORK FOR SCHOOL PAPER/DIVISION

PUBLICATION WITHIN THE TARGET DATE

Bond paper, ballpen

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: ANNA ROSE C. ENRIQUEZ Name of Rater: LEONARDO D. CONDEPosition: Teacher I Position: MASTER TEACHER IReview Period: Date of Review:Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency,Timelines) RATING SCORE*

30% 5 - Outstanding • All daily lesson plans had the following objective,

subject matter,procedures, evaluation and assignment

• Each part had a full description of what to do with an example• Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented and time-bound• 130% and above developed high order thinking skills• Attained 130% and above of the desired learning competencies• 130% and above based on the budget of work4 - Very Satisfactory• Had four of the five parts of lesson plan• Each part of the partial description of what to do with an example• Objective was stated with 1 behavioral indicator is missing• 115-129% developed high order thinking skills• Attained 115-129% of the desired learning competencies• 115-129% based on the approved budget of work3 - Satisfactory• Had 3 of the five parts• Each part had a partial description with out example• Objectives was stated with 3-4 behavioral indicator missing

Weight per KRA

ACTUAL RESULTS

MFO: 2 BASIC

EDUCATION SERVICES




30%

• 100-114% develop high order thinking skills• Attained 100-114% of the desired learning competencies• 100-114% based on the approved budget of work2 - Unsatisfactory• Had 2 of the five parts• Each part had no description with out example• Objectives was stated with 1-2 behavioral indicator missing• 51-99% develop high order thinking skills• Attained 51-99% of the desired learning competencies• 51-99% based on the approved budget of work1 - Poor• Had 1 of the five parts• Each part had no description with out example• Objectives was stated without behavioral indicator m• 50% and below develop high order thinking skills• 50% and below attained the desired learning competencies• 50% and below based on the approved budget of work5 - Outstanding • Pupils were 130% and the above guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal4 - Very Satisfactory• Pupils were 115-129% guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal3 - Satisfactory• Pupils were 100-114% guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal2 - Unsatisfactory• Pupils were 51-99% guided in the observation of classroom rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal1 - Poor• Pupils were not guided in the observation of classroom

MFO: 2 BASIC

EDUCATION SERVICES






30%

rules and the guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card/journal5 - Outstanding • Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 130% and above maintained• Attendance checking was 130% and above systematically carried out4 - Very Satisfactory• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 115-129% maintained• Attendance checking was 115-129% systematically carried out3 - Satisfactory• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 100-114% maintained• Attendance checking was 100-114% systematically carried out2 - Unsatisfactory• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 51-99% maintained• Attendance checking was 51-99% systematically carried out1 - Poor• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 50% and below consistently maintained• Attendance checking was 50% and below systematically carried out

•Student Outcomes 30% 5 - Outstanding • Evidence showed that the teacher purposely plans assessments and varies assessment choices to match the different student needs, abilities, and learning styles.• Class record reflected the bases of 130% and above of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 130% and above of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 130% and above prepared for tests that require it

MFO: 2 BASIC

EDUCATION SERVICES




• Monitored attendance, diversity and appreciation, safe, positive and motivating environment, overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness and orderliness of classrooms including proper waste disposal daily





• Table of specifications showed 130% and above

congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were 130% and above logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 130% and above administered in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)4 - Very Satisfactory• The teacher explained the various uses and limitations of the different kinds of assessments/test. Evidence showed that student needs and avenues for growth were clearly identified.• Class record reflected the bases of 115-129% of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 115-129% of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 115-129% prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications showed 115-129% congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were 115-129% logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 115-129% administered in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)3 - Satisfactory• The evidence of more than one measure of student performance but there is difficulty in analyzing data to

inform instuctional planning and delivery• Class record reflected the bases of 100-114% of pupils' ratings in all classes/subject area• Students' portfolio contained 100-114% of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 100-114% prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications showed 100-114% congruence between content and skills tested• Test questions were 100-114% logically sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 100-114% administered in all




classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on

subject area per class/grade level)2 - Unsatisfactory• The teacher planned instructions without analyzing student learning data• Class record reflected the bases of 51-99% of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 51-99% of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is 51-99%prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications showed 51-99% congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were 51-99% logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were 51-99% administered in all classes/subject area (Supported by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)1 - Poor• No evidence of student monitoring or evaluation of student progress• Class record reflected the bases of 50% and below of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled• Students' portfolio contained 50% and below of his accomplishment• Table of specifications is not prepared for tests that require it• Table of specifications did not show congruence between content and skills test• Test questions were not logiclly sequenced• Pretest and Posttest were never administered5 - Outstanding • 130% and above updated students' school records4 - Very Satisfactory• 115-129% updated students' school records3 - Satisfactory• 100-114% updated students' school records2 - Unsatisfactory






• 51-99% updated students' school records

1 - Poor• 50% and below updatedd students' school records

Once a year 5 - Outstanding 130% and above MPS/GSA4 - Very Satisfactory115%-129% MPS/ GSA3 - Satisfactory100-114% MPS/GSA2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% MPS/GSA1 - Poor50% and below MPS/GSA

30% 5 - Outstanding 130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met4 - Very Satisfactory115-129% of planned meetings producing only set agreements and partial accomplishments of these3 - Satisfactory100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results1 - Poor50% and below of the planned meetings conducted with no result5 - Outstanding 130% and above accomplishment of set visits successful interventions4 - Very Satisfactory115-129% accomplishment of visits with partial success in implementation of interventions3 - Satisfactory100-114% accomplishment of visits with suggested planned interventions2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% accomplishments of visits with planned interventions



• Attained the required GSA for grade level and learning areas



• Conducted periodic PTA meetings/ conferences

Once every grading period


Twice every quarter

30%

1 - Poor

50% and below accomplishments with no interventionsTwice a year 5 - Outstanding 130% and above project accomplishment with full documentation

report on completion4 - Very Satisfactory115-129% project accomplishment with partial completion3 - Satisfactory100-114% project initiative only with no completion report2 - Unsatisfactory51-99% project initiative only with no completion report1 - PoorNo project/event/activity initiated

Once 10% 5 - Outstanding 3 action research conducted with full documentation on completion of interventions.4 - Very Satisfactory2 action research conducted with full documentation on completion of interventions.3 - Satisfactory1 action research conducted with full documentation on completion of interventions.2 - UnsatisfactoryIdentified classroom/learning problems with research proposals1 - PoorOnly classroom/learning/issues identified

June to May 5 - Outstanding Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities with documented results4 - Very SatisfactoryInitiated and participated in co-curricular/ school activities with documented results3 - SatisfactoryParticipated in most co-curricular/ school activities with documented results2 - UnsatisfactoryParticipation only with out document results




Twice every quarter

• Undertaken/ initiated projects/events/activities with external funding/ sponsorship within the target date



• Conducted problem/ classroom based action research


June to May

10%

1 - Poor

No participation in school ActivitiesFebruary 5 - Outstanding Produced publication/creative work published in National

Circulation/ DepEd Post/ CSC Newsletters and similar publications4 - Very SatisfactoryProduced publication/creative work published in regional publications3 - SatisfactoryProduced publication/creative work published in division

publications2 - UnsatisfactoryProduced publication/creative work published in school papers1 - PoorUnpublished work produced

* Toget the score, the rating is multiplied by th weight assigned 0 0

0 LEONARDO D. CONDERatee Rater




• Produced publications/ creative work for school paper/division publication with in the target date

OVERAL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

anna-aip

Documents