anita meeting uc irvine 23 november 2002 ehe cosmic rays, ehe neutrinos and gev- tev gamma rays...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
ANITA MeetingUC Irvine
23 November 2002
EHE Cosmic Rays, EHE Neutrinos
and GeV- TeV Gamma rays
David Kieda
University of Utah
Department of Physics
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
Outline
1) GZK energy Cosmic Ray Measurements
2) GZK energy Cosmic Ray Origin
3) EHE neutrino production
4) EHE neutrino fluxes
5) Conclusion
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
UHE/EHE Cosmic Ray Astrophysics
HiRes Fly’s Eye (2002)
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray Astrophysics
Fly’s Eye Detector (Dugway, Utah)
Hires Fly’s Eye Detector (Dugway, Utah)
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray Astrophysics
320 EeV Cosmic Ray: Energy beyond GZK cutoff (D. Bird et al Ap. J 441, 144 (1995))
GZK cutoff: (d>20 Mpc)
Greisen PRL 16, 748 (1966) Zatsepin & Kuzmin JETP Lett 4, 78 (1966)
0' pp CMB np CMB
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray Spectrum
HiRes Fly’s Eye (2002)
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray Spectrum
AGASA Array (2002)
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray Spectrum
A simple energy rescale looks promising, But…..
Aertures are energy dependent (especially for HiRes & Fly’s Eye)
Bachall & Waxman (2002)
Discrepancy due to differences energy scale factors (within quoted systematics)?
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray Arrival Directions
Cosmic Ray
Akeno (2000). Clustering random chance probabilty ~1% In conflict with HiRes experiment (similar exposure) Hamburg 2001).
Large Scale Anisotropy: Probe correlation with anisotropy of local Galactic population (SuperGalactic Plane) or Galactic Center, Galactic Plane.
>AGN, starburst, magentar, GRB populations correlated with luminous mass
>Dark Matter Halo: Annihilation, Z-burst of relic massive neutrinos
Small Scale Anisotropy: Event clustering with < 10 degree separation. Point source searches.
Competition between increasing particle rigidity and decreasing statistic>Narrow energy window?
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray SourcesBottom-Up
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray PropagationEffects
1) Quantum Gravity Lorentz violation eliminates GZK (Gonzales-Mestres 1999, 2000) *Reduced interaction cross section (smaller final product phase space)
*Reduced Lorentz boosted energy of CMB
-> Probe with time delay of TeV Gamma rays from AGN
2) Z-Burst Models: High Energy Neutrino interacts with heavy relic neutrino in Galactic DM halo (But isn’t this just making thing worse?)
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray PropagationEffects
If CR are indeed extragalactic, and if GZK cutoff does exist,
pion decay leads to guaranteed neutrino flux.
0' pp CMB np CMB
Adapted from C. Spiering (2002).
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray SourcesBottom-Up
AGN with Pair production creating dip at 10 EeV
V. Berezinsky et al (2002) eepp CMB '
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray SourcesBottom-Up
Nearby Magnetars population (< 50 Mpc)
with PetaGauss B fields yields dip
Arons astro-ph/0208444
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray SourcesTop-Down
Typical Topological defect fragmentation :
Production of gammas, e+/e-, neutrinos with fluxes substantially greater than the cosmic rays
(O. Kalashev et al 2002)
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Neutrinos
• Top-Down Models vs. Bottom up give strongly different predictions for Neutrino flux
• Absolute neutrino flux constrained by gamma/neutrino production ratio (GeV/TeV gamma measurements)
•Absolute neutrino flux constrained by absolute cosmic ray flux (Bachall & Waxman bound, Mannheim, Protheroe & Rachen bound)
Some wiggle room if sources are opaque to gammas/cosmic rays and/or large distances to CR sources
VERITAS, 2005 4 tel.2007 7 tel.
ANITA 2005 flight
MAGIC, 1 tel., 2003
GLAST2005 flight
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Neutrinos
Production:
•Direct production in Top-Down Models
(Topologcal defect decay, super-heavy dark matter annihilation, super-heavy X particle decay)
Peak Energy ~100 EeV
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Neutrinos
Production:
•Direct production in Top-Down Models
Z-burst (Gelmaini, Cline, others)
Peak Energy > 100 EeV
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Neutrinos
Production:
• Secondary interactions of CR & production/decay near
acceleration region at EHE CR source (AGN, GRB)
Peak energy ~ 10 PeV (Stecker and Salamon 1996)
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Cosmic Ray Backgroundfor Radio Cherenkov Measurements?
Shock Wave
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
EHE Neutrino Observations
C. Spiering (2002).
ANITA pushes EeV neutrino limits
>Well below diffuse gamma/MPR bounds
>Approaches W&B bond
24 November 2002ANITA Meeting UCI David Kieda, Utah
Conclusions
Shock Wave
•Super GZK Cosmic rays Exist.
•Rate, energy spectrum, isotropy statistically limited
•Difficult to separate Top-Down vs. Bottom up models in cosmic ray properties
•TeV Gamma, BW & MPR bounds do not exclude a strongly peaked flux above 100 EeV.
•GZK+Universal EHE CR production yields predictable 10-100 EeV flux
•Absence of GZK production probably implies GQ Lorentz violation
•Confluence of next generation TeV gamma ray, high energy neutrino & high energy cosmic ray provide strong constraints.
•Radio observations by ANITA play a key role in the next 5-10 years.