andrew b. freistein wenderoth, lind & ponack, l.l.p. learning the abc’s of patent term...
DESCRIPTION
1995: Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) 17 years from issue changed to 20 years from filing 35 U.S.C. §154: patent term extension (PTE) created 1999: America Inventors Protection Act (AIPA) §154 changes PTE to patent term adjustment (PTA) 2013: America Invents Act (AIA) Technical Corrections Act 2015: Final Rules Implementing Novartis v. Lee, 740 F.3d 593 (Fed. Cir. 2014) Relevant Historical Dates © AIPLATRANSCRIPT
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.
Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment
1 © AIPLA 2015
Humira® is the #1 selling drug in the world, earning $23.5 Million per day in the U.S.**AbbVie Second-Quarter 2015 Financial Results
2 © AIPLA 2015
Every Day Counts!
1995: Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)• 17 years from issue changed to 20 years from filing• 35 U.S.C. §154: patent term extension (PTE) created
1999: America Inventors Protection Act (AIPA)• §154 changes PTE to patent term adjustment (PTA)
2013: America Invents Act (AIA) Technical Corrections Act
2015: Final Rules Implementing Novartis v. Lee, 740 F.3d 593 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Relevant Historical Dates
© AIPLA 20153
Patent term adjustment (PTA) applies to all utility and plant patents filed on or after May 29, 2000
For patents filed on or after June 8, 1995 and before May 29, 2000, the patent term extension (PTE) provisions of the URAA apply
No PTA or PTE for any utility or plant patent filed before June 8, 1995
No PTA or PTE for any design patent
© AIPLA 20154
Effective Dates
• A-delay: 35 USC §154(b)(1)(A)• B-delay: 35 USC §154(b)(1)(B)• C-delay: 35 USC §154(b)(1)(C)• Applicant delay: 35 USC§154(b)(2)(C)• 37 CFR 1.702 to 1.704
USPTO Delay Under 35 U.S.C. §154
© AIPLA 20155
A-delay accrues in four types of USPTO delays (the 14+4+4+4 Rule)
(14) 1st Office Action (OA) must issue within 14 months of the filing date
National stage application: the filing date is the date of commencement of the national stage, which is the earliest of: • an express request to begin the national stage,
or• 30 months from the earliest priority date
1st OA may be a Restriction Requirement
A-Delay
© AIPLA 20156
(4) USPTO must respond to Applicant’s Reply within 4 months
(4) USPTO must respond to a Board decision within 4 months
(4) USPTO must issue a patent within 4 months of payment of the issue fee
37 CFR 1.702(a): 14+4+4+4 rule37 CFR 1.703(a): days of adjustment
A-Delay
© AIPLA 20157
• After 3 years of prosecution, Applicant accrues B-delay for each day until the patent issues
• 3 years is measured from:• the U.S. filing date (35 U.S.C. §111(a)), or • the commencement of the national stage (35
U.S.C. §371)• not a foreign priority date• not a U.S. provisional filing date
• 37 CFR 1.702(b) and 1.703(b)
B-Delay
© AIPLA 20158
• Time consumed by an RCE• Time consumed by an interference,
derivation proceeding or secrecy order• Time consumed from review by the Board
or a federal court• Applicant Requested Delay
Exceptions to B-Delay
© AIPLA 20159
Time consumed by RCE begins on the date the RCE is filed and ends on the date a Notice of Allowance is mailed• Novartis v. Lee, 740 F.3d 539 (Fed. Cir. 2014)• 37 CFR 1.703(b)(1) amended Jan. 9, 2015
If an RCE is filed after allowance, then there is Applicant delay under 1.704(c)(12)• Exception: no delay for an RCE filed with an
IDS having a statement under § 1.704(d)
Exceptions to B-delay:Time Consumed by RCE
© AIPLA 201510
371 commencement date: May 24, 20073-year date: May 24, 2010 + 1 = May 25,
2010RCE filed February 28, 2011Notice of Allowance mailed April 25, 2014Patent Issued: July 15, 2014B-delay is 360 days
Example of B-Delay Calculation
When an RCE was Filed
© AIPLA 201511
© AIPLA 201512
5/24/2007
371 Commencement
5/25/2010
3-year +
1 day
2/28/2011
RCE Filed
Notice of Allowance
4/25/2014 7/15/2014
Issuance Date
PTO’s B-delay calculation
279 days
1,512 days
Period after 3-year mark to issuance
1,152 days
Time consumed by RCE PTO’s B-delay pre-Novartis is: 279 days Actual B-delay post-Novartis is: 1,512 – 1,152 = 360 days
81 days
Extra B-delay
Post-Novartis
C-delay fills the gaps of the B-delay exceptions against delays for:• Interference or derivation proceeding• Secrecy order• Successful civil action• Successful Board appeal• To obtain PTA for a successful appeal,
all rejections of at least one claim must be reversed
C-Delay
© AIPLA 201513
PTA shall not exceed the actual number of days of delay (no overlapping calendar days)• Wyeth v. Kappos, 591 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
Terminal Disclaimer filed limiting the patent term to a specific date
Applicant Delay, 35 U.S.C. §154(b)(2)(C)
Limitations on PTA
© AIPLA 201514
35 U.S.C. §154(b)(2)(C) and 37 CFR 1.704PTA is reduced by the number of days Applicant
“failed to engage in reasonable efforts to conclude prosecution”
Failure to respond to any Notice or Office Action (OA) within 3 months of mail date
For any PTO Notice or OA setting a 2-month due date, the 1st month extension does not reduce PTA• E.g., response to restriction, filing appeal brief or RCE
following notice of appeal, response to missing parts, or corrected application papers, etc.
Applicant Delay
© AIPLA 201515
37 CFR 1.704(c) provides 14 types of delay:§ Suspension of action§ Deferral of issuance of a patent§ Abandonment or late issue fee payment§ Failure to petition to withdraw abandonment
or petition to revive§ Conversion from provisional to non-provisional
application§ Submission of a preliminary amendment or
other paper less than 1 month before an OA§ Submission of a reply having an omission
Types of Applicant Delay
© AIPLA 201516
8. Submission of a supplemental reply or “other paper”, other than one expressly requested by the Examiner
Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Lee, 778 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2015)9. Submission of an Amendment or “other paper” after a
Board decision less than 1 month before issuance of an OA or Notice of Allowance (NOA)
10. Submission of an Amendment under 37 CFR 1.312 or “other paper” after a NOA
11. Failure to file an Appeal Brief within 3 months12. Submission of an RCE after a NOA13. Failure to provide an application in condition for
examination within 8 months of filing14. Further prosecution via a continuation application
Mohsenzadeh v. Lee, 790 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Types of Applicant Delay
© AIPLA 201517
Final Rules issued Jan. 9, 2015 define “other paper” that will reduce PTA after allowance as:
1. Amendment under 37 CFR 1.3122. Paper containing a claim of priority or request
to correct claim of priority3. Request for corrected filing receipt4. Certified copy of a priority document5. Drawing6. Letter related to biologic deposits7. Request to correct or change inventorship8. IDS without 37 CFR 1.704(d) statement
“Other Paper” After Allowance Reducing PTA
© AIPLA 201518
1. Fee Transmittal 2. Power of Attorney3. Power to Inspect4. Change of Address5. Change of Entity Status (micro/small/large)6. Response to the Examiner’s reasons for
allowance or a request to correct an error or omission in the Notice of Allowance
7. Letter related to government interests
“Other Papers” that do not reduce PTA
© AIPLA 201519
8. Resubmission of unlocatable paper previously filed in the application
9. Request for acknowledgment of IDS provided that Applicant requested consideration of the IDS prior to issuance of a Notice of Allowance
10. Comments on the substance of an interview where an Applicant-initiated interview resulted in a Notice of Allowance
11. Status Request12. Request for Refund13. Inventor’s Oath/Declaration
“Other Papers” that do not reduce PTA
© AIPLA 201520
Under 37 CFR 1.704(d), an IDS will not reduce if each item of information in the IDS: (i) was first cited in any communication from a patent office in a counterpart foreign or international application or from the USPTO, and this communication was not received by an individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) more than 30 days prior to the filing of the IDS; or (ii) is a communication that was issued by a patent office in a counterpart foreign international application or by the USPTO, and this communication was not received by any individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) more than 30 days prior to the filing of the IDS
IDS with Statement Under 37 CFR 1.704(d)
© AIPLA 201521
A request for reconsideration of the PTA calculation must be filed within 2 months of the issuance of the patent (37 CFR 1.705)• Due date is extendable for 5 months with
payment of an extension fee• Request requires $400 processing fee• 3rd Party cannot request reconsideration of PTA
After USPTO considers request, a dissatisfied patentee may file a civil action in district court within 180 days (35 U.S.C. §154(b)(4))
Correcting the PTA Calculation
© AIPLA 201522
Avoid extensions of time and, when necessary, do not wait until the next due date to file a response
File IDS within 30 days of receipt of foreign/US Office Actions and make 1.704(d) statement
Avoid submissions after Notice of Allowance that do not fall under an “other paper” exception
Maximizing PTA during prosecution
© AIPLA 201523
Obtain PTA calculation from PAIRConsider whether a supplemental response was
expressly requested by the Examiner• USPTO software does not recognize an express
request by the ExaminerConsider whether any IDS has the 1.704(d)
statement• USPTO software does not recognize an IDS having a
1.704(d) statementFor national stage applications, consider whether
the correct 371 commencement date was used
Basic PTA Calculation Review
© AIPLA 201524
Andrew B. FreisteinWenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.
1030 15th Street, N.W., Suite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005
(202) [email protected]
QUESTIONS?
© AIPLA 201525