anchorage final- lec

Upload: samir-batra

Post on 06-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    1/35

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    2/35

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    3/35

    In simple terms anchorage in orthodonticsis defined as resistance to unwanted toothmovement.

    Angle stated that there were many means forobtaining anchorage, including the tooth themselvesand sources external to the teeth. He classified

    anchorage as simple , stationary, reciprocal, intermaxillary and occipital.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    4/35

    Given Angles insistence on expansion of archesrather than extraction to deal with crowdingproblems, it is ironic that his edgewise appliancefinally provided the control for root positionnecessary for successful extraction treatment.

    One of Angles last student, Charles Tweed,adapted the edgewise appliance for extractiontreatment. Tweed placed tip back bends in the

    lower arch to vary the amount of distoaxialinclination of the lower posterior teeth. Theamount of distal tip varied depending on theseverity of malocclusion.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    5/35

    When anchorage preparation as advocated byTweed was used with standard edgewise appliance thetip, torque and offset bends had to be placed in eachedgewise arch. The bends were then duplicated orincreased in the successive arches as the caseprogressed.

    Reed Holdaway in 1952 described pre-angulation of the edgewise appliance in mandibularbuccal segments as a method of setting up posterior

    anchorage units into tipped back or anchorageprepared positions.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    6/35

    Graber: defines anchorage as the nature and degreeof resistance to displacement offered by an anatomicalunit when used for purpose of effecting tooth movement.

    Bennett and McLaughlin: emphasized the need toconsider anchorage in all the three planes of space i.e.,horizontal, vertical and lateral (transverse).

    White & Gardiner:it is the site of delivery fromwhich a force is exerted.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    7/35

    Horizontally anchorage control means limitingthe mesial movement of the posterior segmentwhile encouraging the distal movement of anterior

    segment.

    Vertically, anchorage control involves thelimitation of vertical skeletal and dentaldevelopment in the posterior segment andlimitation or vertical eruption of, or even intrusionof anterior segments.

    In transverse plane It comprises of themaintenance of expansion procedures, primarily inupper arch, and the avoidance of tipping or

    extrusion of posterior teeth during expansion.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    8/35

    Sources of Anchorage:(i)extra-oral(ii)intra-oral

    Extra-oral anchorage is the anchorage in which oneof the anchorage unit is situated outside the oralcavity . Extra-oral anchorage can be furtherclassified as :

    Cervical Cranial

    o Occipitalo parietal

    Facial eg. Delaire FacemaskIntra-oral anchorage : It is the anchorage in

    which the resistance units are all situatedwithin the oral cavity e.g., teeth, palate,

    muscular forces, inclined planes of teeth.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    9/35

    Classification of anchorage: Acc to Moyers

    (i)Dep. On manner of force application:

    Simple

    Stationary

    Reciprocal

    (ii)Dep. On jaws involved:

    Intermaxillary

    Intramaxillary

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    10/35

    (iii) Dep. on site of anchorage:

    Intra oralExtra oralMuscular

    (iv) Dep. on no. of anchor units:

    Single / primaryCompoundMultiple/ reinforced

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    11/35

    1.Natural anchorageIt comes from any resistance afforded within the arch

    according to the application of forces between any given teeth

    or group of teeth.Simple Anchorage : Dental anchorage in which the manner and application of force

    tends to displace or change axial inclination of the tooth or teeth

    that form the anchorage unit in the plane of space in which theforce is being applied.

    In other words resistance of anchorage unit to tipping is utilizedto move another tooth or teeth.

    Compound Anchorage : Here anchorage is provided by more than one tooth with

    greater support is used to move teeth with lesser support.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    12/35

    Reciprocal / Multiple anchorage :It involves pitting of two teeth

    or two groups of teeth of equal

    anchorage value against each otherto produce reciprocal toothmovement. Eg: closing of diastemas: twocentral incisors are pitted against eachother.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    13/35

    Stationary Anchorage :Dental anchorage in which the manner

    and application of force tend to displace theanchorage unit bodily in the plane of space inwhich the force is being applied is termedstationary anchorage (Graber).

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    14/35

    2. Reinforced Anchorage :

    It involves reinforcing theanchorage or resistance area

    either by adding more resistanceunits or by the use of variousadjuncts.

    A simple way of reinforcinganchorage is to band the secondmolars. Various other ways

    include, the use of T.P.A., Nanceholding arch, lower lingual arch. Tissue anchorage such asobtained by lip bumper can be

    efficiently used to distalize molars.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    15/35

    This is obtained byvarious meansnamely:

    1.Extra oral force toaugment anchorage

    2.Upper anteriorinclined plane &SVED APPLIANCE

    3.Trans palatal arch

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    16/35

    3. Prepared AnchoragePrepared anchorage pre sets the teeth into

    disto-axial inclination, greatly increasing theirresistance to displacement. This method is veryeffective for controlling anchorage, especiallywhen anchorage is critical.

    4. Active root thrust :This concept was put forward by Dr. Calvin

    Case in 1908. It involves building bodilyresistance into the anchor area through the use ofextensions fixed to the bands of the molar teeth.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    17/35

    Cortical anchorage : The cortical bone is more resistant to resorption

    than the medullary bone. The cortical anchorageconcept makes use of this. Ricketts advocated torquing the rootsof buccalteeth outwards against the cortical plate as a way toinhibit their mesial movement. Torquing movements are limited by facial andlingual cortical plates. If a root is persistently forced

    against the cortical plate, tooth movement is greatlyslowed, root resorption is likely and eventual penetrationof cortical bone may sometimes occur.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    18/35

    Graberhas classified anchorage as intramaxillaryanchorageandintermaxillary anchorage.

    1. Intramaxillary anchorage is the anchorage iswhich the resistance units are all situated with in thesame jaw. If appliances are placed only in maxillaryor mandibular arch they are considered, intra maxillary

    resistance units.

    2. Intermaxillary anchorage is anchorage in whichthe units situated in one jaw are used to effect toothmovement in the other jaw. Also called BAKERS

    anchorage.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    19/35

    SELECTION OF ANCHORAGE:

    Since anchorage must be selected to make

    proper use of the space created by extraction, amore rational approach of classifying anchoragewould be the one which guides the operator tomake use of the available space.

    Accordingly anchorage in mandibular archcan be put into three classes:DEPENDING ON ANCHOR LOSS EXPECTED:

    minimum,moderate andmaximum anchorage.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    20/35

    Minimum anchorage mechanics involvedreciprocal forces between posterior teeth and anteriorteeth with no effort to maintain a moment on theanchor area.

    Minimum anchorage mechanics are selectedwhen the mandibular posterior teeth may be permitted

    to migrate mesially into half or more of the extractionsite.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    21/35

    Moderate anchorage mechanics involve placingan active root thrust or movement on the anchor teeth,causing bodily resistance in this area.

    Moderate anchorage mechanics are selectedwhen the mandibular posterior teeth may be permittedto move forward into one fourth to one half of theextraction site.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    22/35

    Maximum anchorage mechanics involvereinforcing the anchor teeth with all means availableand reducing the workload required of the anchor areaby developing forces outside the mandibular arch foras much of the desired tooth movement possible.

    Maxillary anchorage mechanics are selected

    when the mandibular posterior teeth may be permittedto move forward into no more than one fourth of theextraction site.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    23/35

    We have a wide array of appliances

    available to gain and preserve anchorage in allthe three dimensions of space. These adjunctsavailable are broadly classified into:

    extraoral and

    intra-oral appliances

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    24/35

    The extra oral appliances: Various Headgearassemblies,or retractors as some author prefers to callthem, essentially constitute this group. Moyers adds

    the face mask to this group.

    The intra oral adjuncts can be grouped according tothe plane of space in which they act. The transpalatalarch acts in all the three dimensions. Whereas lacebacks, Nance/lingual holding arches, lip bumper act inanteroposterior direction.

    Head gear and face mask give adequate control invertical plane. Where as T.P.A. and quad helix help topreserve the expansion in transverse plane.

    HEAD GEAR

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    25/35

    HEAD GEARHead gears are classified according to the point of origin of force:

    Cervical Anchorage obtained from nape of the neckOccipital /Straight pull anchorage obtained from back of

    the head. The line of traction is parallel to occlusal plane.Parietal /High pull Anchorage obtained from upper part ofthe head and always above the center of resistance of tooth.Combi pull The line of traction is between high pull and

    straight pull.Another variable in the headgear is the outer bow

    of the facebow:

    The outer bow can belong, medium or short.

    FORCE AND DURATION OF WEAR

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    26/35

    FORCE AND DURATION OF WEAR :Most of the authors agree that the amount of forceapplied to maxilla by the headgear should be between

    400 800 gm(Graber, King, Blucher, Moore, Rickets,Wieslander, Sodensky, Ringberg, Borton, Pfieffer andGroberty ).Light continuous forces seem to produce more dental

    changes than skeletal . Whereas heavy force andintermittent wear is found to produce more skeletalchange.According to Marcotte force values of 200 gms per side

    in mixed dentition and 500 gms per side in permanentdentition for 18-20 hrs / day suggested.Graber advocates force application of more than 400gms for 10-12 hrs / day.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    27/35

    FACE MASK: It is an extra oral

    anchorage source. It derives anchorage from

    facial bones. Sites of anchorage:

    1.From skull2.From chin3.From skull & chin

    Force applied: approx. 1pound (450 gms) per side.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    28/35

    TRANSPALATAL ARCHTranspalatal arch is a secondary

    method of anchorage support inupper posterior segment.It is made by 0.045 or 0.051 stainless steel round wirewhen it is soldered to the molar bands with loop placed

    in the middle of palate so that wire is placed 2 mm fromthe roof of palate.If the TPA is placed 6-8 mm down from palate it caninduce molar intrusion due to tongue pressure. It can be

    used to expand maxillary molar width as well as stabilizeagainst occipital pull head gear. After crossbitecorrection, it will maintain molar position againstundesirable side effects of utility arches used in the

    maxillary arch.

    NANCE AND LINGUAL HOLDING ARCHES

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    29/35

    NANCE AND LINGUAL HOLDING ARCHESThe nance holding arch extends from maxillary molarsto anterior portions of the palatal vault. It is a fixed

    appliance. An acrylic button, but half inch or less indiameter, is attached to the palate. This button mustcreate light seal with the palate to prevent the creation offood trap.

    It is important to position the acrylic button against the

    vertical component of the palatal vault.The stabilizing lingual arch for the lower lie behind andbelow the lower incisors, so that it doesnot interfere withtheir retraction. The lower lingual arch is conveniently

    inserted from distal than from the mesial of molar tube.

    LIP BUMPER

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    30/35

    LIP BUMPER

    Lip bumper has been used for molaranchorage, prevention of poor lip habits

    and creation of increased space formandibular arch.The appliance hasstainless steel wire of 0.045 that spansthe facial surface of mandibular arch

    without contacting teeth and is insertedinto tubes attached to the mandibularmolars. Anteriorly the wire is coveredwith plastic tubing or a shield made of

    acrylic that holds the lower lip away fromthe mandibular incisors. Forces frommentalis muscle are transmitted tomandibular molars, enabling them tomove to an u ri ht and distal osition.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    31/35

    BAKERS ANCHORAGE:

    It is a type of intermaxillary anchorage.Class II traction applied between the lowermolars and upper anteriors as well as Class III

    traction applied between upper molars and loweranteriors are referred to as BAKERS

    ANCHORAGE.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    32/35

    ANCHORAGE PLANNING:

    It is of utmost importance in the success of

    orthodontic treatment. Therefore it is very muchessential to carefully assess the anchoragedemands of the individual case and select the mostappropriate treatment plan.

    It depends on the following factors:

    1.NUMBER OF TEETH TO BE MOVED:

    2.TYPE OF TEETH BEING MOVED

    3.TYPE OF TOOTH MOVEMENT

    4.DURATION OF THE TREATMENT

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    33/35

    CONCLUSIONAs orthodontic treatment continues to change and

    improve, innovative techniques may find acceptance in

    certain types of cases. Magnetic forces or electricstimulation may possibly show the path to an improvedmechanotherapy. But by and large, the basic concept ofarchwires placed in brackets to move teeth will remain

    the most efficient method.Fundamental principles of anchorage laid down by

    Tweed have remained unchanged and will continue to

    remain so. The list of adjuncts available may increase.The objective in selection of treatment mechanics is tohave a bag a tricks that is large enough to treat most of

    the conditions, but not so large as to be unmanagable to

    incorporate into ones practice routine.

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    34/35

  • 8/3/2019 Anchorage Final- Lec

    35/35