analyze effects of multifocal intraocular lenses on potential acuity meter and perimetry testing
DESCRIPTION
Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing. G. Yuricek Aylin Sarac S.A. Erzurum, MD, FACS. Financial Interests. The authors have no financial interests in any of the test devices mentioned in this study. Purpose:. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing
G. YuricekAylin Sarac
S.A. Erzurum, MD, FACS
![Page 2: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Financial Interests
The authors have no financial interests in any of the test devices mentioned in this study.
![Page 3: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Purpose:
Evaluate the effectiveness of potential acuity meter (PAM) after multifocal lens implantation.
Evaluate effects of multifocal lenses on visual field testing.
![Page 4: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Methods:
4 types of lenses were evaluated ReSTOR +4, ReSTOR IQ +3,
REZOOM, and monofocal lens Monofocal lenses used were
SA60AT, SN60WF, and Clarflex
![Page 5: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Methods:
All patients underwent visual exam All patients underwent Humphrey
visual field 24-2 on each eye separately.
All patients were evaluated on the PAM.
No dilation was performed on any patient.
![Page 6: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Results:
46 eyes of 23 patients were included in the study.
12 eyes monofocal lenses 10 eyes ReSTOR IQ 12 eyes ReSTOR 12 eyes REZOOM
![Page 7: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Results:
PAM was done on all patients. Only one patient due to small pupils could not perform test.
Remaining 44 eyes all achieved 20/25 visual acuity or better on the PAM testing.
![Page 8: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Humphrey Visual Field: Examples of ring effect
![Page 9: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Visual Field Results: Monofocal Group
8/12 eyes normal visual field 1/12 eyes ring effects 1/12 reduced sensitivity
![Page 10: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Visual Field Results: ReSTOR +4 Group
8/12 eyes normal visual field 3/12 ring effect 1/12 superior visual field defect
attributable to ptosis
![Page 11: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Visual Field Results: ReSTOR IQ Group
8/10 eyes normal visual field 2/10 eyes ring effect
![Page 12: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Visual Field Results: ReZOOM Group
6/12 eyes normal visual fields 5/12 eyes ring effect 1/12 mild superior field defect
attributable to mild ptosis
![Page 13: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Conclusion: PAM Results
Comparing monofocal lenses to ReSTOR, ReSTOR IQ, and ReZOOM lenses appeared to show no differences in results.
Thus, poor PAM results should indicate pathology for decreased visual performance.
![Page 14: Analyze Effects of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Potential Acuity Meter and Perimetry Testing](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813aec550346895da3594b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Conclusion: Visual Field
Appeared to be reliable in all groups.
Slight concern that ReZOOM lenses induce a higher incidence of ring effects.
ReSTOR and ReSTOR IQ lens appeared to be equal to monofocal lenses in visual field performance.