analysis: type 10 vs. ansi 385

21
Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385 Paul Griffin, Ph.D. Chief Technology Officer Identix April 2005

Upload: others

Post on 28-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

Paul Griffin, Ph.D.Chief Technology OfficerIdentix

April 2005

Page 2: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

2© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Topics/Questions

• Type 10s can consist of face images denoted by the “FAC” IMG entry.

• ANSI 385 encodes face image data and factors present in the image and during image creation.

• What is the overlap between type 10 and ANSI 385?

• What additional capabilities would be achieved by adding more fields to type 10?

• What is in 385 that is a candidate for inclusion into a new type 10?

• Is there a logical “fit” between type 10 and 385 or should 385 be added whole elsewhere?

Page 3: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

Image Information

Page 4: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

4© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Image Information

Type 10• Photo Date• Width/Height• Scale Units• Color Space

– YCC – RGB 888– Grayscale

• Compression– JPEG – JPEGL (Lossless)

ANSI 385• Photo Date (from CBEFF)• Width/Height• Not present• Color Space

– YUV 422 (Specific YCC)– RGB 888 – Grayscale

• Compression– JPEG– JPEG2000

Page 5: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

5© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Image Info in 385 not in Type 10

• Source Type • Some usefulness in – Unknown Photo identifying the video vs. – Digital Camera film to compensate for – Scanner log-gamma differences – Video Frame Analog between video and still – Video Frame Digital photography– etc • Interlacing artifacts can

• Device Type be removed from video – Vendor ID when source is identified

• Quality • Interlaced video frame – Placeholder intended to capture can be explicitly

represent expected match forbidden using performance application profiles (PIV).

Page 6: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

xy

z

11.5

11.4

11.2

10.2

10.4

10.10

10.810.6

2.14

7.1

11.6 4.6

4.4

4.2

5.2

5.4

2.10

2.122.1

11.1

Tongue

6.26.4 6.3

6.1Mouth

8.18.9 8.10 8.5

8.3

8.7

8.2

8.8

8.48.6

2.2

2.3

2.6

2.82.9

2.72.5 2.4

2.12.12 2.11

2.142.10

2.13

10.610.8

10.4

10.2

10.105.4

5.2

5.3

5.1

10.1

10.910.3

10.510.7

4.1 4.34.54.6

4.4 4.2

11.111.2 11.3

11.4

11.5

x

y

z

Nose

9.6 9.7

9.14 9.13

9.12

9.2

9.4 9.15 9.5

9.3

9.1

Teeth

9.10 9.11

9.8

9.9

Feature points affected by FAPsOther feature points

Right eye Left eye

3.13

3.7

3.9

3.5

3.1

3.3

3.11

3.14

3.10

3.12 3.6

3.4

3.23.8

Feature Points

Page 7: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

7© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Why include feature points?

• “Minutia” of the face– Required for all face matching algorithms (at least

the eye positions at minimum for 2D matching)– Can be automatically determined with good quality

(mainly frontal face) data.– Can be difficult to determine in low-res video or with

significant pose• Future Forensic Face Applications

– Submitting non-frontal non-high-quality face images for searching will require feature point determination on the client

– Similar to minutia markup of latents with investigator workstations

Page 8: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

8© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

On Forensic Face

• Applications are being developed where face images are used for lookup either fused with finger or stand-alone investigations.

• Significant manipulation of the face image may be required – sharpening, gamma correction, noise removal, frame merging, pose correction.

• Landmarks and pose information are likely to be submitted along with the face image data to aid the search system(s).

• Functionality requires additions to ANSI/NIST-ITL-2000 – feature points, new pose angles.

Page 9: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

Facial Information

Page 10: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

10© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Differences in Philosophy

Type 10 ANSI 385• Can denote “unique” • Encapsulates permanent

permanent physical properties of the face characteristics of body image discernable by per NCIC code manual examination of the

– Moles photograph– Scars – Eye color– Tattoos – Hair color– Missing body parts – Observed Gender– Eye color • Encapsulates temporary – Hair color face properties associated

• Encapsulates some with face match temporary characteristics performance

– Pose – Expression– Hat/scarf – Blinking– glasses – 3D pose angles

– glasses

Page 11: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

11© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Permanent Physical Characteristics

• Type 10, via NCIC code manual, allows for a much richer encoding of these characteristics

– Unlikely that 385 can contribute new indicators– Organization could be improved to allow for easier

input by users…

Page 12: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

12© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Temporary Image Characteristics

• For the face, 385 offers a richer parameterization of these indicators due to focus on face match performance

– Teeth visible– Mouth open– Smile (closed jaw)– Smile (mouth open)– Raised eyebrows– Eyes looking away from camera– Squinting– Frowning

• Useful indicators for forensic face applications

Page 13: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

13© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Pose angles in 385

• Superset of Type 10– Encoding difference need

to be addressed• 3D pose angles in 385

– Yaw: same angle as subject pose in type 10

– Pitch: difficult issue for face match algorithms

– Roll: easier to compensate for using image processing

• Will typically be required manual input for forensic face applications

Page 14: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

On Quality

Page 15: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

15© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Activity/Status

Resolution (Image Size)Under Exposured (Brightness)Good Contrast (Entropy)Well Focused (Sharpness)Others (Half-tone patterns, …)

• NIST (Grother) is working to develop face quality methodology

• Identix and others are developing quality metrics

• Placeholders in ANSI and ISO formats

• However, not ready to mandate a universal face quality score for frontal face images

• And not ready to certify face quality modules Head Viewpoint (Pose)

Face Presency (Faceness)Detectable Eyes (Confidence)

Others (Natural Expression, Liveness, …)

Face Geometry (Size, Position)Wearing Eyeglasses (Clear eyes,

Glare)High Resolution (Texture)Proper Lighting (Face &

Background)

Page 16: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

On Face Image Types

Page 17: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

17© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Full Frontal Face Image Type

• A single “application • Similar concept to 381 profile”, the frontal image finger image data levels type encapsulates most 31 requirements with requirements for superior WSQ 15:1 and appendix Fmug shot capture • Similar to Mike McCabe’s

– The PIV application profile photo mug shot best starts with this and practices improves by mandating compression and source – Lists Detailed constraints requirements for scene,

• This is not present in lighting, subject, format.

Type 10, which relies – Compression requirements extremely upon other “best important

practice” documentation

Page 18: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

Recommendations

Page 19: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

19© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Options to Extend Type 10 (part 1)

1. Add color JPEG2000 as an allowed image format1. Superior human examination quality for

fixed compression compared to JPEG2. Add source type to aid in artifact removal and

gamma (gain) correction.3. Add quality measure with algorithm source

identifier4. Add feature point(s) Facial Image Attribute

1. Essential for face search applications.2. Possible use for skull forensics

Page 20: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

20© 2005 Identix Inc. All rights reserved.

Options to Extend Type 10

5. Add 3D pose angle set.1. Essential for face investigator workstations

6. Add Frontal Mug Shot Application Profile1. Including compression limits2. Including capture source requirements3. Make into the improved Mug Shot capture standard

7. Add Temporary Face Image Attributes1. Expression, blinking, etc.2. Helpful to face match algorithms.

Page 21: Analysis: Type 10 vs. ANSI 385

Thank You. Questions?