analysis of simply supported composite plates with uniform pressure using ansys and maple
DESCRIPTION
Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple. Second Progress Report 11/28/2013. Thin Plate Theory. Three Assumptions for Thin Plate Theory There is no deformation in the middle plane of the plate. This plane remains neutral during bending. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple
Second Progress Report11/28/2013
![Page 2: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Thin Plate Theory
Three Assumptions for Thin Plate Theory• There is no deformation in the middle plane of the
plate. This plane remains neutral during bending.• Points of the plate lying initially on a normal-to-the-
middle plane of the plate remain on the normal-to-the-middle surface of the plate after bending
• The normal stress in the direction transverse to the plate can be disregarded
![Page 3: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Material Properties and Governing Equations
Modulus of Elasticity (E)
10 x 106 psi
Thickness (h) 0.250 inchPoisson's Ratio (ν) 0.3Edge Length (a) 24 inchApplied Surface Pressure (q)
10 psi
• wmax = α*q*a4/D
• D = E*h3/12*(1-ν2)
![Page 4: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ANSYS Model with Mesh
Side 2
Side 1
Side 4
Side 3
Origin
• Due to Symmetry only a quarter of the plate needs to be modeled• The mesh size has an edge length of 0.75”•Side 1 and Side 2 are constrained against translation in the z-direction. •Side 2 and Side 3 is constrained against rotating in the x-direction•Side 1 and Side 4 is constrained against rotation in the y-direction•The origin is constrained against motion in the x- and y-directions• A pressure of 10 psi is applied to the area
Side 2
Origin
Side 4
Side 1
Side 3
![Page 5: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Results of Aluminum Plate• From governing equations:wmax = 0.941399”
• From ANSYSwmax = 0.941085”
• % Error = 0.033%
![Page 6: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Material Properties of Composite Laminate
Edge Length (a) 24 inch
Ply Thickness 0.040 inch
E1 2.25e7 psi
E2 1.75e6 psi
E3 1.75e6 psi
ν12 0.248
ν23 0.458
ν13 0.248
G12 6.38e5 psi
G23 4.64e5 psi
G13 6.38e5 psi
Applied Surface Pressure (q)
10 psi
![Page 7: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Governing Equations
Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites: Agarwal & Nroutman
ABD Matrix:
![Page 8: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Governing Equations (cont.)
Mechanics of Composite: Jones
For Cross-ply Laminates the [D] matrix simplifies and the governing equation reduces to:
![Page 9: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Governing Equations (cont.)• For symmetric angle laminates, the ABD
matrix is fully defined.• The boundary conditions for a symmetric
angle laminate are:
![Page 10: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Governing Equations (cont.)
• Using the Rayleigh-Ritz Method based on the total minimum potential energy will provide an approximation of the deflection of the plate
![Page 11: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ANSYS Model with Mesh
Side 2
Side 1
Side 4
Side 3
Origin
• Due to Symmetry only a quarter of the plate needs to be modeled• The mesh size has an edge length of 0.75”•Side 1 and Side 2 are constrained against translation in the z-direction. •Side 2 and Side 3 is constrained against rotating in the x-direction•Side 1 and Side 4 is constrained against rotation in the y-direction•The origin is constrained against motion in the x- and y-directions• A pressure of 10 psi is applied to the area
Side 2
Origin
Side 4
Side 1
Side 3
![Page 12: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results of Composite PlateComposite Plate Results
[0 90 0 90]s Laminate
•From governing equations:wmax = 0.7146”
• From ANSYSwmax = 0.7182”
• % Error = -0.5%
![Page 13: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Results of Composite Plate (ANSYS)Laminate Stack-up Deflection - ANSYS (in) Deflection - Maple (in) Percent Error
[0 90]s 5.682 5.666 -0.282
[0 90 0 90]s 0.7182 0.7146 -0.50
[0 90 0 90 0 90]s 0.2141 0.21196 -1.0
[0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90]s 0.091 0.0895 -1.7
[+/-30 0]s 1.404 1.4585 3.74
[+/-45 0]s 1.271 1.3822 8.04
[+/-60 0]s 1.405 1.4628 3.95
[+/-30 0 +/-30 0]s 0.1592 0.1777 10.4
[+/-45 0 +/-45 0]s 0.1452 0.1685 13.81
[+/-60 0 +/-60 0]s 0.1600 0.1796 10.9[+/-30]s 6.299 5.7712 -9.15
[+/45]s 5.796 5.680 -2.04[+/-60]s 6.299 5.7712 -9.15[+/-30 +/-30]s 0.5966 0.5546 -7.57
[+/-45 +/-45]s 0.4989 0.5614 11.13[+/-60 +/-60]s 0.5966 0.5546 -7.57[+/-30 +/-30 +/-30]s 0.1528 0.1719 11.11
[+/-45 +/-45 +/-45]s 0.1371 0.1611 14.9[+/-60 +/-60 +/-60]s 0.1528 0.1719 11.29
![Page 14: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Failure Criterion
![Page 15: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Failure Criterion (cont.)• The Tsai-Wu Failure Criterion is based on the
following equations:
![Page 16: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Failure Criterion (cont.)Maximum Stress Criterion for bi-axial loading of composite plate:
![Page 17: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Failure Criterion (cont.)Tsai-Wu Criterion for bi-axial loading of composite plate:
![Page 18: Analysis of Simply Supported Composite Plates with Uniform Pressure using ANSYS and Maple](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56816184550346895dd11910/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusions• The composite plate that had the smallest deflection was the 12 ply
[+/-45 +/-45 +/-45]s laminate.• The thinnest plate that had the smallest deflection was the 8 ply
[+/-30 +/-30]s and [+/-60 +/-60]s laminates• The larger percent error for the results occurred for the symmetric angle ply trials. This is because of
the nature of the Rayleigh-Ritz Method. When the composite has symmetric angle plies there is a full [D] matrix. The full [D] matrix does not allow for a separation of variables method to be used to calculate the deflection because not all of the boundary conditions can be satisfied. The Rayleigh-Ritz Method approximates the deflection by using a Fourier expansion for the total potential energy.
• The calculated percent error seems to be within reason for the analysis that was done for this project. The Rayleigh-Ritz Method does not provide an exact solution when compared to the method for a specially orthotropic plate.
• The most reasonable plate arrangement that would be suitable for replacing the aluminum plate is the 8 ply orientations of [+/-30 +/-30]s, [+/-45 +/-45]s, [+/-60 +/-60]s. These three ply combinations can withstand a significant stress in the 1-direction, 2-direction, and 12-direction (shear) in comparison to other composite plates. These 8 ply plates will also be marginally thicker than the 0.25" aluminum plate, but provide a significant decrease in overall weight.