analysis of mathematical beliefs of malaysian secondary school students

5
1877-0428 © 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.753 Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 4702–4706 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com WCES-2010 Analysis of mathematical beliefs of Malaysian secondary school students Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi a *, Mohd Ariff Ahmad Tarmizi b a Institute for Mathematical Research, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia b Institute of Liberal Studies, University TENAGA Malaysia, Malaysia Received November 5, 2009; revised December 8, 2009; accepted January 20, 2010 Abstract This study focus on the affective issues related to mathematics learning and instruction and specifically on mathematical beliefs, attitudes or values. Schuck and Grootenboer (2004), Leder and Forgasz (2006) and Grootenboer and Hemmings (2007) indicated that there has been an increased interest in the role of affective factors in the teaching and learning of mathematics. These affective factors included mathematics-related beliefs such as students’ mathematical beliefs towards mathematics, beliefs on mathematical competency, motivational beliefs, beliefs about learning context, beliefs about social context which impacted mathematical performance, to name a few. The purpose of this study was to examine mathematics-related beliefs of secondary school students namely, students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency and students beliefs on their mathematics teachers attribute in mathematics teaching. A total of 430 secondary students participated in the survey. Findings indicated an overall significant effect on students’ beliefs in mathematical competency, F (4,416) = 48.41, p = 0.001, adjusted R 2 = 0.31 with three significant predictors namely, students’ beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching, grades in mathematics and gender. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mathematical beliefs; mathematics teaching and learning; mathematics performance; beliefs on teachers’ role; beliefs on self- mathematical competency. 1. Introduction A review of the education system in Malaysia had been planned to meet the demands and challenges of globalisation and the K-economy. According to the K-Economy Master Plan, 2002, the important aspects for the development of K-economy and participation in the wave of globalization are ‘literacy; secondary enrolment; tertiary enrolment; enrolment in science and technology-related subjects; science graduates; technical graduates; expenditure on education; thinking and innovation skills; a learning culture; lifelong-learning facilities; English language skills;and receptivity to change.’ (Ministry of Finance, Malaysia, K-Economy Master Plan, 2002). As the discipline of mathematics itself is integrated in the field of science and technology, mastering it is essential so that the knowledge, skills and expertise developed can support the growth of a K-economy with emphases on mathematical, scientific and language competency together with the development of a creative and * Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. Tel.: +603-8946-6889 ; fax: +603-8942-3789 E-mail address: [email protected]

Upload: rohani-ahmad-tarmizi

Post on 12-Sep-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1877-0428 © 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.753

Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 4702–4706

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

WCES-2010

Analysis of mathematical beliefs of Malaysian secondary school students

Rohani Ahmad Tarmizia *, Mohd Ariff Ahmad Tarmizib aInstitute for Mathematical Research, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

bInstitute of Liberal Studies, University TENAGA Malaysia, Malaysia

Received November 5, 2009; revised December 8, 2009; accepted January 20, 2010

Abstract

This study focus on the affective issues related to mathematics learning and instruction and specifically on mathematical beliefs, attitudes or values. Schuck and Grootenboer (2004), Leder and Forgasz (2006) and Grootenboer and Hemmings (2007) indicated that there has been an increased interest in the role of affective factors in the teaching and learning of mathematics. These affective factors included mathematics-related beliefs such as students’ mathematical beliefs towards mathematics, beliefs on mathematical competency, motivational beliefs, beliefs about learning context, beliefs about social context which impacted mathematical performance, to name a few. The purpose of this study was to examine mathematics-related beliefs of secondary school students namely, students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency and students beliefs on their mathematics teachers attribute in mathematics teaching. A total of 430 secondary students participated in the survey. Findings indicated an overall significant effect on students’ beliefs in mathematical competency, F (4,416) = 48.41, p = 0.001, adjusted R2 = 0.31 with three significant predictors namely, students’ beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching, grades in mathematics and gender. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mathematical beliefs; mathematics teaching and learning; mathematics performance; beliefs on teachers’ role; beliefs on self- mathematical competency.

1. Introduction

A review of the education system in Malaysia had been planned to meet the demands and challenges of globalisation and the K-economy. According to the K-Economy Master Plan, 2002, the important aspects for the development of K-economy and participation in the wave of globalization are ‘literacy; secondary enrolment; tertiary enrolment; enrolment in science and technology-related subjects; science graduates; technical graduates; expenditure on education; thinking and innovation skills; a learning culture; lifelong-learning facilities; English language skills;and receptivity to change.’ (Ministry of Finance, Malaysia, K-Economy Master Plan, 2002).

As the discipline of mathematics itself is integrated in the field of science and technology, mastering it is essential so that the knowledge, skills and expertise developed can support the growth of a K-economy with emphases on mathematical, scientific and language competency together with the development of a creative and

* Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. Tel.: +603-8946-6889 ; fax: +603-8942-3789 E-mail address: [email protected]

Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi and Mohd Ariff Ahmad Tarmizi / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 4702–4706 4703

innovative mind. Mathematics education in Malaysia should therefore produce a Malaysian workforce that is well-trained, a brilliant thinker, creative, innovative, competitive, possesses a multitude of skills, enterprising, confident, able to master and utilize the latest digital technology and is a continual learner (Ministry of Education, National Education Blueprint 2006-2010). In relation, an individual with positive attitude, beliefs or values besides strong conceptual knowledge and mathematical knowledge would have a greater chance to thrive in a demanding globalised world.

Recent theories on cognition and learning pointed that acquiring knowledge or learning consist of getting acquainted with the rules and concept that characterize different activities in differing contexts. Hence learning is a form of engagement with active use of cognitive and metacognitive skills. However, many posited that the heart of learning cannot be based merely on these two factors. Studies by Connell and Wellborn (1990) and Schiefele and Csikszentmihalyi (1995) pointed to the role of conative and affective factors with close interaction with metacognitive factors as key elements in learning. They concluded that motivation are perceived as determining elements in quality learning. In addition, self-confidence and positive emotions have become the important constituent of learning and problem solving. However, recent developments had shown that students’ belief about mathematics, their motivational beliefs, students’ perceived confidence and influence of emotions were determinants of mathematical learning and problem solving (Seegers & Boekaerts, 1993; Vermeer, 1997; DeCorte, Verschaffel & Op’t Eynde, 2000). Studies have also demonstrated that students’ mathematical beliefs were also related to other constructs such as affects, school culture, and personal emotions.

Pajares (1992) posited that belief about mathematics can determine how one chooses to mentally construct the whole idea of mathematics. This is especially true when the belief has been in-grained in the students’ world of mathematics. Beliefs are personal principles, constructed from experience that an individual employs, often unconsciously to interpret new experiences and information and to guide action. Actions taken by students during learning processes have greatly affected the knowledge acquisition of mathematics. Cobb (1986) defined beliefs as an individual’s personal assumptions about the nature of reality. The importance of beliefs in the life of a student is stressed again because these assumptions constitute the goal-oriented activity. In learning environments, students’ belief might propagate the idea for achievements and smoothness of learning. In the mathematics learning process, student’s belief about the nature of mathematics and factors related to the learning are two components that always concern mathematics educators. In addition, affect is a significant and critical dimension of learning (Zembylas, 2004). With this in mind, it seems important to pay close attention to the mathematical classroom experiences of students, as these are critical in the development of affective dispositions and views towards mathematics (Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006).

Much recent studies by Schuck and Grootenboer (2004) declared firmly that in the last decade or so there has been increased interest in the role of affective factors in the learning of mathematics and confirmed by Leder and Forgasz, (2006), Grootenboer and Hemmings (2007) and Ernest (1994). There is an assumption that positive mathematical beliefs, attitudes, and feelings will lead to increased mathematical achievement and while this seems like a reasonable proposition, it does warrant further investigation. However, the relationship between affective factors and learning in mathematics is not simple, linear and unidirectional; rather it is complex and intricate. Gresalfi and Cobb (2006) suggested that learning in mathematics is more than just the acquisition of skills and knowledge, and, “it is not sufficient to focus exclusively on the ideas and skills that we want students to learn” (p. 55). Mason and Scrivan (2004) have also ascertained that the influence of beliefs in mathematical and academic performance.

The first purpose of this study was to ascertain mathematics-related beliefs of secondary school students namely, students’ beliefs in mathematical competency and students’ beliefs on their mathematics teachers attribute in mathematics teaching. The second purpose was to determine relationships and predict the influence of several predictor variables on students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency.

2. Methodology

The survey method was used to collect data from the randomly chosen secondary schools in selected states in Malaysia. Questionnaires were administered to secondary school students during their class session with the cooperation of their class teachers. Participants were given self-reported questionnaire which consist of three sections. The first section solicit demographic information of the students, the second section were assessment of students’ beliefs in mathematical competency (adapted from Op’t Eynde, de Corte, & Verschaffel, 2006) and the

4704 Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi and Mohd Ariff Ahmad Tarmizi / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 4702–4706

third section were measures of students beliefs on their mathematics teachers attribute in mathematics teaching. These items were adapted from the mathematics-related beliefs questionnaire (MBRQ) developed by Op ‘t Eynde and De Corte (2003). Each item was scored on a 6-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (disagree very strongly) to 6 (agree very strongly). Consequently students’ responses for each dimension were summed to compute beliefs in students’ mathematical competency and beliefs on teachers attributes in mathematics teaching. High scores indicated high and positive beliefs’ in the respective aspects. The reliability coefficients (Cronbach alpha) of the students’ beliefs in mathematical competency subscales was 0.89 whilst the students’ beliefs on teachers’ attribute in mathematics teaching was 0.92. Hence, both measures of the subscales achieved high internal consistency.

3. Results

3.1 Descriptive Analyses

The distribution of scores on students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency, students’ beliefs in their teachers’ attributes to teaching mathematics and mathematics grades did not deviate from normal distributions. Altogether only 430 participants were included in the study whose mathematics grades were obtained from the school records. The participants comprise of males (45.3%) and females (54.6%). In terms of ethnicity, 26.8% were Malays, 35.7% were Chinese, 14.5% were Indians and 23% were from the indigenous group.

As shown in Table 1, the dimensions of students’ beliefs in mathematical competency ranged from scores of 2.33 to 4.86 with majority of the items with scores above 4.00. This suggests that students’ beliefs of their mathematical competency were high and positive. Generally, findings indicated that students believed that they can do well in mathematics with positive attitudes towards learning mathematics in the classroom (see Table 1 for details of mean responses of each of the items).

Table 1. Students beliefs related to their mathematical competency

No. Statement related to personal competencyin mathematics Mean SD

1. I think that what I am learning in this class is interesting. 4.34 1.61 2. I like what I am learning in this class. 4.36 1.54 3. I’m very interested in Mathematics. 4.41 1.57 4. I like doing mathematics. 4.26 1.49 5. I prefer class work that is challenging so I can learn new things. 4.28 1.50 6. I expect to do well on the mathematics tests and assessments we do. 4.86 1.28 7. I prefer mathematics when I have to work hard to find a solution. 4.36 1.42 8. I find I can do hard mathematics problems with patience. 4.06 1.42 9 I am certain I can learn how to solve the most difficult mathematics problem. 4.18 1.48 10. I don’t have to try too hard to understand mathematics. 2.33 1.56 11. Compared with others in the class, I think I’m good at mathematics. 2.99 1.50 12. I think I will do well in mathematics this year. 4.44 1.39 13. I understand everything we have done in mathematics this year. 3.76 1.39 14. I can usually do mathematics problems that take a long time to complete. 3.90 1.38 15. I can understand even the most difficult topics taught me in Mathematics. 3.63 1.39 16. By doing the best I can in Mathematics I try to show my teacher that I’m better than other students. 3.58 1.51 17. I try hard in mathematics to show the teacher and my fellow students how good I am. 3.80 1.56 Overall mean of students’ beliefs in mathematical competency 3.97 0.92

The mean scores for students’ beliefs in their teachers’ attributes to teaching mathematics were detailed in Table

2. Findings indicated that students’ beliefs on their teachers were positive with high ratings on showing step-by-step procedures in solving mathematical problems. Students also showed positive beliefs on teachers’ role in making mathematics learning enjoyable, interesting, and making learning mathematics understandable, meaningful and a friendly atmosphere.

Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi and Mohd Ariff Ahmad Tarmizi / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 4702–4706 4705

Table 2. Students’ beliefs on teachers’ attributes to mathematics teaching

No. Statement related to teacher attributes Mean SD

1. My teacher really wants us to enjoy learning new things. 4.63 1.40 2. My teacher understands our problems and difficulties with Mathematics. 4.25 1.56 3. My teacher tries to make the Mathematics lessons interesting. 4.61 1.51 4. My teacher appreciates it when we try hard, even if our results are not so good. 4.45 1.73 5. My teacher always shows us, step by step, how to solve a mathematical problem. 5.09 1.29 6. My teacher listens carefully to what we say. 4.46 1.45 7. My teacher is friendly to us. 4.71 1.54 8. My teacher always gives us time to really explore new problems and try out different solution strategies. 4.31 1.41 9 My teacher wants us to understand the content of this Mathematics course. 4.92 1.27 10. My teacher explains why mathematics is important. 4.20 1.61 11. We do a lot of group work in this mathematics class. 3.23 1.68 12. My teacher thinks mistakes are okay as long as we are learning from them. 4.68 1.40 13. My teacher is too absorbed in the mathematics to notice us. 4.27 1.63 14. My teacher does not really care how we feel in class. 4.52 1.63 Overall mean of students’ beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching 4.45 0.98

3.2 Correlation and Regression Analyses

As shown in Table 3, the dimensions of students’ beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching, grades in mathematics and gender were found significantly correlated to their own beliefs in mathematical competency.

Table 3. Intercorrelations between predictor variables with students’ beliefs on their mathematical competency

Variables 1 2 3 4

5

1. Students’ beliefs in mathematical competency 1.00 - - - - 2. Students’ beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching .480** 1.00 - - - 3. Mathematics grade .261** .046ns 1.00 - - 4. Ethnicity .016ns .085** .138** 1.00 - 5. Gender .085* .005ns .014ns .080ns 1.00

**p<.001, nsnot significant

Further analysis on understanding students’ beliefs were conducted using a standard multiple regression analysis incorporating students’ beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching, mathematics grade, ethnic group and gender as predictor variables. Findings indicated an overall significant effect on students’ beliefs, F (4,416) = 48.41, p= 0.001, adjusted R2 = 0.31 with three significant predictors namely, beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching, grades in mathematics and gender. The standardized coefficients for the predictor variables which indicate the unique contribution of each predictor variable are as follows: beliefs on teachers attributes to mathematics teaching, = .493, t (430)= 12.12, p < 0.05; mathematics grade, = .283, t (430)= 6.92, p < 0.05, gender, = .083, t(430)= 2.04, p < 0.05 and ethnic group, = .006, t (430)= 0.15, p > 0.05.

4. Discussion

The aim of the study was to examine the factors (personal and teachers role) influencing students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency among secondary school students. Based on previous research related to learning environments, students’ belief might propagate the idea for better achievements and improve teaching and learning. In the mathematics learning process, student’s belief about the nature of mathematics and factors related to the learning are two components that always concern mathematics educators. In addition, affect is a significant and critical dimension of learning (Zembylas, 2004). In this study, we surveyed using 31-item questionnaire which aimed to measure students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency and their beliefs on teachers’ role in mathematics classroom. It was recognised that importance and close attention to the mathematical classroom experiences of students are critical in the development of affective dispositions and beliefs towards mathematics

4706 Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi and Mohd Ariff Ahmad Tarmizi / Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 4702–4706

(Gresalfi & Cobb, 2006; Grootenboer & Hemmings, 2007). Findings of this study suggest that students’ beliefs on teachers’ role and gender significantly contributed to their beliefs on being mathematically competent. In addition mathematics grades were found to be highly correlated with their beliefs on being mathematically competent hence a significant contributing factor in the regression analysis. The students surveyed in this study comprised of different cultural context (in this case, ethnicity). However their ethnicity classification was not a significant contributing factor to students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency. Hence, these findings suggest further investigation to be conducted on several cultural factors as earlier findings had suggested the powerful influence of cultural context on students’ beliefs in mathematics. Teachers’ strong influence on students’ beliefs in their mathematical competency suggest the importance of teachers’ role in mathematics classrooms which leads to improvement in students’ mathematics performance. Thus, it is necessary for mathematics teachers to bring into mathematics classrooms positive learning climate so as to enhance students’ beliefs in mathematics hence their performance in mathematics.

References

Cobb, P. (1986). Contexts, goals, beliefs and learning mathematics. For the learning of mathematics, 6(2), 2 9. No.1, 41-47. Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1998). A constructive perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio

(Eds), The Culture of The Mathematics Classroom pp. 158-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Connell, J. P. & Wellborn, J. G. ((1990). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M.

Gunnar, & L.A. Stroufe (eds), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Vol 23. Hills dale, N.J.: Earlbaum. DeCorte, E., Verschaffel, L. & Op’t Eynde, P. (2000). Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.

R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (eds), Handbook of self-regulation (pp 687-726). San Deigo: Academic Press. Ernest, P. (1994). The Impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In Bloomfield, A. & Harries, T. (eds). Teaching and Learning in

Mathematics, Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics. Gresalfi, M. .S., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies:

An International Journal, 1(1), 49-57. Grootenboer, P. & Hemmings, B. (2007). Mathematics Performance and the Role Played by Affective and background factors. Mathematics

Education Research Journal 2007, Vol. 19, No. 3, 3–20 Higgins, 1997 Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2006). Affect and mathematics education: PME perspectives. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of

research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 403-427). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Mason, L. & Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhancing students’ mathematical beliefs: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 14,153-176 Ministry of Education. (2006). National Education Blueprint 2006-2010. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Ministry of Finance Malaysia (2002). K- Economy Master Plan. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Finance, Malaysia. Op’t Eynde, P., de Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). Beliefs and metacognition: An analysis of junior high students’ mathematics-related

beliefs. In M. Veenman and A. Desoete (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education. New York: Nova Science. Pajeras, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, pp. 307-

332. Schuck, S., & Grootenboer, P. J. (2004). Affective issues in mathematics education. In B. Perry, C. Diezmann & G. Anthony (Eds.),

Review of mathematics education in Australasia 2000-2003 (pp. 53-74). Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed. Schiefele, U. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1995). Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement. Journal for Research

in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 163-181. Seegers, G. & Boekaerts, M. (1993). Task motivation and mathematics in actual task situations. Learning and Instruction, 3, 133-150. Vermeer, H. J.(1997). Sixth-grade students’ mathematical problem solving behaviour: Motivation variables and gender differences. Leiden:UFB,

Leiden University. Zembylas, M. (2004). Young children’s emotional practices while engaged in long-term science investigation. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 41(7), 693-719.