analysis and interpretation of data -...

Chapter IV Analysis and Interpretation of Data

108

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Effectiveness of circuit training and Interval training on selected physical variables of

College men Kabaddi players.

4.2.1 Speed

4.2.2 Speed Endurance

4.2.3 Agility

4.2.4 Explosive Power

4.2.5 Reaction Time

4.2.6 Abdominal Strength Endurance

4.3 Effectiveness of circuit training and Interval training on selected physiological

variables of college men Kabaddi players.

4.3.1 Resting Heart Rate

4.3.2 Vital Capacity

4.4 Effectiveness of circuit training and interval training on selected psychological

variables of college men Kabaddi players.

4.4.1 General Anxiety

4.4.2 Self Confidence

4.4.3 Achievement Motivation


109

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

4.1 Introduction

ccording to Best (1992) analysis of data is the heart of the research report. The analysis and

interpretation of data often vary with the nature and purpose of investigation.

"Analysis of data means studying the tabulated material in order to determine the inherent facts

or meanings. It involves breaking down existing complex factors into simple parts and putting the

parts together in new arrangements for interpretations" (Sukhia, 1983).

Interpretation is a critical examination of the results obtained in the study. "The process of

interpretation is essentially one of stating what the results (findings) shows, who do they mean,

what is their significance" (Good, 1954).

The purpose of the study was to analyse and ascertain the effect of selected physical,

physiological and psychological variables of 18 to 25 years old college men Kabaddi players in

A


110

Kerala state. To achieve the purpose of the study it is necessary to find out the effect of circuit

training and interval training on selected physical, physiological and psychological variables of

college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The study was confined with three groups, control group (1)

circuit training group (2) and interval training group (3). The subjects were tested on selected

physical, physiological and psychological variables such as speed, speed endurance, agility,

explosivepower, reaction time, abdominal strength endurance, resting heart rate, vital capacity,

anxiety, self confidence and achievement motivation respectively. The data obtained were subjected

to statistical analysis by applying statistical methods viz, Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Analysis

of co-variance (ANCOVA), Co relation and t’test to find the significant variation of variables in

order of priority to differentiate between the effect of control group, circuit training group and

interval training group separately.

The data obtained on the effectiveness of Circuit and Interval training on selected physical,

physiological and psychological variables of college men Kabaddi players were analysed and the

details of analysis are given under appropriate heads.

4.2 Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on selected physical variables of

college men Kabaddi players.

Inorder to findout the effectiveness of the circuit training and interval training on selected

physical variables such as peed, speed endurance, agility, explosivepower, reaction time, and

abdominal strength endurance of college men Kabaddi players, the collected data were analysed and

the details of analysis of each variable is given below:

4.2.1 SPEED

The pre test and post test scores among control group, circuit training group and interval

training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to level of speed in 50 yard

dash is given in Table 4.1


111

Table 4.1

Level of speed in 50 yard dash of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala

Test Level Control Group Circuit Group Interval Group

N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 6 30.0 5 25.0

Average 9 45.0* 9 45.0* 9 45.0*

High 6 30.0 5 25.0 6 30.0

Post Test

Low 4 20.0 3 15.0 3 15.0

Average 10 50.0* 12 60.0* 15 75.0*

High 6 30.0 5 25.0 2 10.0

* denotes the Level of Speed in 50 yard

From the table 4.1 it is clear that in the post test level of speed in 50 yard dash is higher in

interval group (75%) than the control group (50 %)and circuit group(60%).

Effectiveness of circuit training and interval training on speed in 50 yard dash of college men

Kabaddi players.

The pre test and post test scores of the control, circuit and Interval training groups were

subjected to the statistical technique, analysis of co variance to findout the effectiveness of circuit

and interval training on speed in 50 yard dash of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The

summary of analysis of variance over pre test(x) and post test (y) scores of players in the Control,

circuit and interval groups taken separately is given in Table 4.2

Table 4.2

Summary of Analysis of variance of Pre test and post test scores of speed in 50 yard dash

among the control, circuit and interval group

Source of Variance df SSx SSy MSx(Vx) MSy(Vy) Fx Fy

Among group

mean 2 0.076 0.390 0.038 0.195

0.348

1.544

Within group

mean 57 6.249 7.196 0.110 0.126

Total 59 6.326 7.585


112

From table of F ratio, for df (2/57);

F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

The F ratio for the pre test and post test scores was tested for significance. Fx value obtained is

0.348 (Fx = 0.348). It is less than F at 0.05 level (i.e., 3.16). So it can be interpreted that the

experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control group do not differ significantly with regard

to pre testin speed (50 yard dash). The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test

scores of speed in 50 yard dash.

The obtained value of Fy is 1.544(Fy = 1.544). It is less than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00).Hence it

can be interpreted that the experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control group do not differ

significantly with regard to post test in speed (50 yard dash). The three groups are more or less

equal with regard to post test scores of speed in 50 yard dash.

The summary of analysis of co variance of pre test and post test scores of players in

experimental (circuit and interval) and control groups are given in Table 4.3

Table 4.3

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores of speed in 50 yard

dash among players in experimental (circuit and interval) and Control groups (ANCOVA)

Source of

Variance df SSx SSy SSxy SSyx MSy(Vyx) Fyx SDyx

Among group

mean 2 0.08 0.39 0.08 0.30 0.15

22.51

Within group

mean 56 6.25 7.20 6.53 0.38 0.01 0.08

Total 58 6.33 7.59 6.61 0.68


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 22.51

The obtained value of F is 22.51 (Fyx=22.51). It is greater than the table value at 0.01 level

(i.e,=5.00). This shows that the final mean scores of treatment groups differ significantly after they

have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of speed in 50 yard dash.


113

The data for adjusted means of post test scores of players in experimental and control groups is

given in Table 4.4

Table 4.4

Data for adjusted means of post test scores in experimental and control groups

GROUPS N MX MY Adjusted Y Mean

MYX(adj)

Control 20 6.46 6.41 6.45

Circuit training 20 6.53 6.39 6.35

Interval training 20 6.45 6.23 6.27

Group Means 20 6.49525 6.397

From table ‘t’ for df=56,

‘t' at 0.01 level =2.67

‘t’ at 0.05 level=2.005

Minimum significant difference required at .01 = 0.067

Minimum significant difference required at .05 = 0.052

Table 4.5

Difference between adjusted means (Myx ) of experimental (Circuit and interval) and Control

groups

Difference between adjusted means (Myx ) of control and circuit training groups =0.097 which is

greater than 0.067 implies that the both the groups differ significantly at 0.01 level. Difference

between adjusted means (Myx ) of control and interval training groups =0.174 which is greater than

0.067 implies that the both the groups differ significantly at 0.01 level and difference between

adjusted means (Myx ) circuit and interval training groups =0.078 which is greater than 0.067

implies that the both the groups differ significantly at 0.01 level.

Groups MYX(adj) Difference RM

Control 6.45 0.097 Significant

Circuit training 6.35

control 6.45 0.174 Significant

Interval training 6.27

Circuit training 6.35 0.078 Significant



114

It can be interpreted from the analysis of co variance among adjusted means of experimental

and control groups that there is significant difference between experimental and control groups with

respect to speed in 50 meter dash i.e, interval training group (Myx =6.27) is significantly superior to

control (Myx = 6.45) and circuit training group (Myx = 6.35) with regard to their post test scores.

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of speed in 50 meter dash among the Control,

Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi players

Inorder to findout the significance difference between pre test and post test means of

experimental and control groups, the critical ratio of the pre test and post test scores were

calculated. For this, the mean and standard deviation of the groups were calculated. The data and

the result of the test of significance are given in Table 4.6

Table 4.6

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of speed in 50 meter dash among the control,

circuit and interval group Kabaddi players

Group Test Mean S.D r Value Calculated ‘t’

value P Value

Control Pre Test 6.48 0.36

0.97 2.35 0.03 Post Test 6.43 0.39

Circuit Pre Test 6.52 0.28

0.99 20.97 0.00 Post Test 6.39 0.27

Interval Pre Test 6.52 0.31

0.99 50.61 0.00 Post Test 6.29 0.31

p<0.01 indicates significant at 1% level

As the p value of the table is less than 0.05, there is significant difference between pre test and

post test scores of speed in 50 yard dash among the control group, circuit and interval group

Kabaddi men players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups seem to take

more time in their pre testto complete 50 yard dash than that of post test which reveals that they

perform better in their post test. This is illustrated in Graph 4.A

Chapter IV

Difference between pre test and

control, circuit and interval

Co relation between circuit group and interval group

Inorder to findout the co relation

dash, the mean and standard deviation of

computed to see whether there is any relationship between them.

coefficient are shown in the Table 4.7

6.15

6.2

6.25

6.3

6.35

6.4

6.45

6.5

6.55

Pre Test Post Test

Control

6.48

6.43

Analysis and Interpretation of Data

115

Graph 4.A

pre test and post test scores of speed in 50 meter dash among the

control, circuit and interval group Kabaddi players (based on time)

between circuit group and interval group in Speed in 50 yard

o relation between circuit group and interval group in s

tandard deviation of the data were calculated and the c

computed to see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and c

Table 4.7

Post Test Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test

Circuit Interval

6.52

6.39

6.52

6.29

Mean Score


scores of speed in 50 meter dash among the

(based on time)

yard dash

interval group in speed in 50 yard

the data were calculated and the co relation were

he result and co relation

Control Pre Test

Control Post Test

Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


116

Table 4.7

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in Speed of Pre test and post test

Test Group No Mean S.D ‘r’ value ‘P’ Value

Pre Circuit 20

6.52 0.28

0.15 0.52 Interval 20

6.52 0.31

Post Circuit 20

6.39 0.27

0.12 0.58 Interval 20

6.29 0.31


As the r value of the table 4.7 is positive, the proposed hypothesis i.e, the circuit and interval

training will have a positive co relation with variable- speed is accepted.

4.2.2 SPEED ENDURANCE


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to level of speed endurance in

600 meter run is given in Table 4.8

Table 4.8

Level of speed endurance in 600 meter run of college men of different group Kabaddi players

in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

Average 7 35.0 8 40.0* 7 35.0

High 8 40.0* 7 35.0 8 40.0*

Post Test

Low 4 20.0 1 5.0 3 15.0

Average 9 45.0* 16 80.0* 11 55.0*

High 7 35.0 3 15.0 6 30.0

* indicates the level of speed endurance in 600 meter run

From the table 4.8 it is clear that in the post test the level of speed endurance in 600 meter

run of college men is higher in circuit group (80%) than the control and interval group.


117

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on Speed Endurance in 600 meter run

of college men Kabaddi players.

The pre test and post test scores of the control, circuit and interval groups were subjected to

the statistical technique, analysis of co variance to findout the effectiveness of circuit and interval

training on speed endurance in 600 meter run of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The

summary of analysis of variance over pre test(x) and post test(y) scores of players in the control,


Table 4.9

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores of Speed Endurance in 600

meter run among the Control, Circuit and Interval group


Among group mean 2 0.039 1.555 0.019 0.778 0.198

10.602

Within group mean 57 5.601 4.181 0.098 0.073

Total 59 5.640 5.736


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

The F ratio for the pre test and post test scores was tested for significance. Fx value obtained

0.198 (Fx = 0.198). It is less than F at 0.05 level (i.e, 3.16). So it can be interpreted that the


to pre test in speed endurance (600 meter run). The three groups are more or less equal with regard

to pre test scores of speed endurance in 600 meter run.

The obtained value of Fy is 10.602(Fy = 10.602). It is greater than F at 0.01 level (i.e,

5.00).Hence it can be interpreted that the experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control

group differ significantly with regard to post test in speed endurance (600 meter run).


experimental (circuit and interval) and control groups is given in Table 4.10


118

Table 4.10

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores of speed endurance in 600

meter run among players in experimental (circuit and interval) and Control groups

(ANCOVA)

Source of Variance df SSx SSy SSxy SSyx MSy(Vyx) Fyx SDyx

Among group mean 2 0.04 1.56 -0.17 1.77 0.89

24.39

0.19

Within group mean 56 5.60 4.18 3.46 2.04 0.04

Total 58 5.64 5.74 3.29 3.81

From table of F ratio, For df (2/56);

F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 24.39

The obtained value of F is 24.39(Fyx=24.39). It is greater than the table value at 0.01 level


have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of speed endurance in 600 meter run.


given in Table 4.11

Table 4.11

Data for adjusted Means of post test scores in experimental and control groups


MYX(adj)

Control 20 1.913 1.860 1.878



GroupMeans 20 1.942 1.781

For table t for df =56,

‘t at 0.05 =2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01 =2.67


119

Mininmum significant difference required at 0.01 = 0.161

Minimum significant difference required at 0.05 = 0.121

The difference between adjusted means (Myx) of post test scores of players in experimental

(circuit and interval) and control groups is given in Table 4.12

Table 4.12


groups

MYX(adj) Difference RM









between adjusted means(Myx ) of control and interval training groups =0.442 which is greater than


adjusted means(Myx ) circuit and interval training groups =0.227 which is greater than 0.161 implies

that the both the groups differ significantly at 0.01 level.

It can be interpreted that the analysis of covariance among adjusted means of experimental and

control groups revealed that there is significant difference between experimental and control groups

with respect to speed endurance in 600 meter run i.e, interval training group (Myx =1.46) is

significantly superior to control (Myx = 1.88) and circuit training group (Myx = 1.68) with regard to

post test scores.


120

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of Speed endurance in 600 meter run among the

Control, Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi players





Table 4.13

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of Speed Endurance in 600 meter run among the


Test Mean S.D r Value Calculated

‘t’ value P Value

Control Group Pre Test 1.96 0.31

0.96 2.51 0.02 Post Test 1.91 0.32


0.84 6.02 0.00 Post Test 1.65 0.32


0.79 7.27 0.00 Post Test 1.60 0.31



post test scores of speed endurance in 600 meter run among the control group, circuit and cnterval

group Kabaddi men players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups seem to

take more time in their pre test to complete 600 meter run than that of post test which reveals that

they perform better in their post test. This is illustrated in Graph 4.B

Chapter IV


the Control, Circuit and Interval

Co relation between circuit group


600 meter run, the mean and s



Relationship between circuit group and inter

Test Group

Pre Circuit

Interval

Post Circuit

Interval

p<0.01 indicates significant

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

Control

1.961.91


121

Graph 4.B

pre test and post test scores of Speed Endurance in 600 meter run among

the Control, Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi players (based on time)

between circuit group and interval group in speed endurance

o relation between circuit group and interval group in speed e

standard deviation of the data were calculated and the c


Table 4.14

Table 4.14

between circuit group and interval group in Speed Endurance of

post test

No Mean S.D ‘r’ value

20 1.90 0.33 0.01

20 1.94 0.32

20 1.65 0.32 0.03

20 1.60 0.31


Circuit interval

1.91.94

1.651.6


scores of Speed Endurance in 600 meter run among

group Kabaddi players (based on time)

ndurance in 600 meter run

and interval group in speed endurance in

tandard deviation of the data were calculated and the co relation were

computed to see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation

in Speed Endurance of Pre test and

‘r’ value ‘P’ Value

0.96

0.98

Pre test

Post test


122

As the r value of the table 4.14 is positive, the proposed hypothesis i.e, the circuit and

interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- speed endurance is accepted

4.2.3 AGILITY


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to level of agility is given in

Table 4.15

Table 4.15

Level of Agility of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 1 5.0 1 5.0

Average 9 45.0* 11 55.0* 13 65.0*

High 6 30.0 8 40.0 6 30.0

Post Test

Low 3 15.0 1 5.0 3 15

Average 8 40.0* 14 70.0* 12 60*

High 9 45.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

* indicates the level of agility

Table 4.15 shows that in the post test the level of agility is higher in circuit training group (70%)

than the control and interval group.

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on agility of college men Kabaddi

players.



training on agility of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The summary of analysis of variance

over pre test(x) and post test(y) scores of players in the control, circuit and interval groups taken

separately is given in Table 4.16


123

Table 4.16

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores on agility among the

Control, Circuit and Interval group


Among group mean 2 0.011 1.300 0.005 0.650 0.059

7.095


Total 59 5.076 6.519


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00


0.059 (Fx = 0.059). it is less than F at 0.05 level( i.e, 3.16). So it can be interpreted that the


to pre testin agility. The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test scores of agility.

The obtained value of Fy is 7.095(Fy = 7.095). It is greater than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00).Hence

it can be interpreted that the experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control group differ

significantly with regard to post test in agility.



Table 4.17

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on agility among players

in experimental (circuit and interval) and control groups (ANCOVA)


Among group mean 2 0.011 1.300 0.085 1.157 0.579

25.416

Within group mean 56 5.066 5.220 4.470 1.275 0.023 0.151

Total 58 5.076 6.519 4.555 2.432


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 25.416


124



have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of agility.


given in Table 4.18

Table 4.18



MYX(adj)

Control 20 9.975 9.952 9.942



Group Means 20 9.965 9.772


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67

Minimum significant difference required at 0.01 =0.127


The difference between adjusted means (Myx) of post test scores of players in experimental


Table 4.19


groups









125









respect to agility i.e., circuit training group(Myx =9.60) is significantly superior to control (Myx =

9.94) and interval training group (Myx = 9.79) with regard to their post test scores.

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of agility among the Control, Circuit and Interval

group Kabaddi players





Table 4.20

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of agility among the Control, Circuit and Interval

group Kabaddi players

Group Test Mean S.D r

Value

Calculated


Control Group Pre Test 10.00 0.29

0.95 2.18 0.04 Post Test 9.96 0.30


0.69 7.87 0.00 Post Test 9.59 0.24


0.83 4.92 0.00 Post Test 9.78 0.32


Chapter IV

As the p value of the table is less than 0.05, th

post test scores of agility among the control group, circuit and i

of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups perfor

illustrated in Graph 4.C




and standard deviation of the data were calculated and the c

there is any relationship between them.The result and c

4.21

9.3

9.4

9.5

9.6

9.7

9.8

9.9

10

Control

109.96


126

value of the table is less than 0.05, there is significant difference between

agility among the control group, circuit and interval group Kabaddi men players

ean value it is clear that all the groups perform better in their

Graph 4.C

pre test and post test scores of agility among the Control, Circuit and

Interval group Kabaddi players

between circuit group and interval group in agility

o relation between circuit group and interval group in agility, the

tandard deviation of the data were calculated and the co relation were computed to see whether

there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation coefficient are shown in the

Circuit Interval

9.959.98

9.96

9.59

9.78


ere is significant difference between pre test and

nterval group Kabaddi men players

m better in their post test. This is

scores of agility among the Control, Circuit and

nterval group in agility, the mean

were computed to see whether

coefficient are shown in the Table

Pre Test

Post Test


127

Table 4.21

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in Agility of pre test and post test


Pre Circuit 20 9.95 0.27

0.27 0.24 Interval 20 9.98 0.30

Post Circuit 20 9.59 0.24

0.07 0.24 Interval 20 9.78 0.32


As the r value of the table 4.21 is positive, the proposed hypothesis i.e., the circuit and

interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- agility is accepted.

4.2.4 EXPLOSIVE POWER


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to explosive power(level of

standing broad jump) is given in Table 4.22

Table 4.22

Level of Explosive Power (standing broad jump) of college men of different group Kabaddi

players in Kerala

Test Level Control Group Circuit Group

Interval

Group

N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

Average 10 50.0* 9 45.0* 10 50.0*

High 5 25.0 6 30.0 5 25.0

Post Test

Low 6 30.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

Average 8 40.0* 9 45.0* 8 40.0*

High 6 30.0 6 30.0 7 35.0

* indicates the level of standing broad jump

Table 4.22 reveals that the post test score is higher for circuit group (45%) than control and interval

group with respect to explosive power (level of standing broad jump).


128

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on explosive power (standing broad

jump) of college men Kabaddi players.



training on explosive power (standing broad jump) of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The

summary of analysis of variance over pre test(x) and post test (y) scores of players in the control,


Table 4.23

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores on explosive power (standing

broad jump ) among the Control, Circuit and Interval group


Among group mean 2 90.30 1865.70 45.15 932.85 0.13

2.58


Total 59 20406.60 22455.00


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00




to pre test in explosive power (standing broad jump). The three groups are more or less equal with

regard to pre test scores of explosive power (standing broad jump).

The obtained value of Fy is 2.58 (Fy = 2.58). It is less than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00).Hence it


significantly with regard to post test in explosive power (standing broad jump).




129

Table 4.24

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on explosive power

(standing broad jump )among players in experimental (circuit and interval) and control

groups (ANCOVA).


Among group mean 2 90.30 1865.70 -262.35 2472.71 1236.35

180.89


Total 58 20406.60 22455.00 19999.00 2855.46


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 180.89



have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of explosive power (standing broad jump).


given in Table 4.25

Table 4.25



MYX(adj)

Control 20 238.25 242.15 241.03



Group Means 20 237.13 248.90


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67

Minimum significant difference required at 0 .01 = 2.207



130

The difference between adjusted means(Myx ) of post test scores of players in experimental


Table 4.26


groups








Difference between adjusted means (Myx ) of control and circuit training groups =15.744 which

is greater than 2.207 implies that the both the groups differ significantly at 0.01 level. Difference







respect to explosive power (standing broad jump) i.e., circuit training group (Myx =256.77) is

significantly superior to control (Myx = 241.03) and interval training group (Myx = 248.98) with

regard to their post test scores.

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of explosive power (standing broad jump) among

the Control, Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi players





Chapter IV

Comparison of Pre test and

the Control, Circuit and In

Group

Control Group Pre Test

Post Test

Circuit Pre Test

Post Test

Interval Pre

Post Test

S – Significant

As the p value of the table is less than 0.05, t

post test scores of explosive power

interval group Kabaddi men players of Kerala. From the

seem to perform better in their


among the Control, Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi players

225

230

235

240

245

250

255

260

265

Control

239.25

243.25


131

Table 4.27

post test scores of explosive power (standing broad jump)


Test Mean S.D r Value Calculated

‘t’ value

Pre Test 239.25 18.35 0.99 14.23

Post Test 243.25 17.82

Pre Test 243.10 19.18 0.96 27.23

Post Test 262.50 19.00

Pre Test 242.35 20.90 0.99 25.37

Post Test 254.90 21.29

Significant

value of the table is less than 0.05, there is significant difference

explosive power (standing broad jump) among the control

p Kabaddi men players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups

their post test. This is illustrated in Graph 4.D

Graph 4.D

pre test and post test scores of explosive power (standing broad jump)


Circuit Interval

243.1 242.35243.25

262.5

254.9


explosive power (standing broad jump) among

Kabaddi players

Calculated


14.23 0.00

27.23 0.00

25.37 0.00

here is significant difference between pre test and

control group, circuit and

ean value it is clear that all the groups

scores of explosive power (standing broad jump)


Pre Test

Post Test


132

Co relation between circuit group and interval group in explosive power

Inorder to findout the co relation between circuit group and interval group in explosive power

(standing broad jump) the mean and standard deviation of the data were calculated and the co

relation were computed to see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co

relation coefficient are shown in the Table 4.28

Table 4.28

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in Explosive power of pre test and post

test


Pre Circuit 20 262.50 19.00

0.31 0.19 Interval 20 254.90 21.29

Post Circuit 20 243.10 19.18

0.32 0.18 Interval 20 242.35 20.90



interval training will have a positive co relation with variable-explosive power (standing broad

jump) is accepted.

4.2.5 REACTION TIME


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to level of reaction time is

given in Table 4.29


133

Table 4.29

Level of reaction time of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 4 20.0 3 15.0 3 15.0

Average 16 80.0* 11 55.0* 12 60.0*

High 00 00.0 6 30.0 5 25.0

Post Test

Low 5 25.0 3 15.0 4 20.0

Average 8 40.0* 12 60.0* 8 40.0*

High 7 35.0 5 25.0 8 40.0

* indicates the level of reaction time

From the table 4.29 it is clear that in the post test the level of reaction time is higher in circuit

group (60%) than the control and interval group.

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on reaction time of college men

Kabaddi players.



training on reaction time of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The summary of analysis of

variance over pre test(x) and post test (y) scores of players in the control, circuit and interval groups

taken separately is given in Table 4.30

Table 4.30

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores on reaction time among the



Among group mean 2 0.0025 0.0109 0.0013 0.0055 0.3271

1.4105


Total 59 0.22 0.23


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00


134




to pre testin reaction time. The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test scores of

reaction time.

The obtained value of Fy is 1.4105 (Fy = 1.4105). It is less than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00).Hence

it can be interpreted that the experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control group do not

differ significantly with regard to post test in reaction time.



Table 4.31

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on reaction time among

players in experimental (circuit and interval) and control groups (ANCOVA).


Among group mean 2 0.003 0.011 -0.004 0.021 0.011

31.481


Total 58 0.222 0.232 0.206 0.040


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 31.48


(i.e.,=5.00). This shows that the final mean scores of treatment groups differ significantly after they

have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of reaction time.


given in Table 4.32


135

Table 4.32



MYX(adj)

Control 20 0.34 0.33 0.34


Interval

training 20 0.35 0.31 0.32

Group Means 20 0.35 0.32


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67



The difference between adjusted means (Myx ) of post test scores of players in experimental


Table 4.33


groups








Difference between adjusted means (Myx) of control and circuit training groups =0.046 which is


between adjusted means (Myx) of control and interval training groups =0.024 which is greater than


adjusted means (Myx) circuit and interval training groups =0.022 which is greater than 0.0155



136

It can be interpreted from the analysis of co variance among adjusted means of experimental and

control groups that there is significant difference between experimental and control groups with

respect to reaction time i.e., circuit training group(Myx =0.29) is significantly superior to control

(Myx = 0.34) and interval training group (Myx = 0.32) with regard to their post test scores.

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of reaction time among the Control, Circuit and






Table 4.34

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of reaction time among the Control, Circuit and



Value

Calculated


Control

Group

Pre Test 0.33 0.05 0.99 8.49 0.00

Post Test 0.32 0.05


0.74 6.06 0.00 Post Test 0.30 0.06


0.92 6.40 0.00 Post Test 0.31 0.05



post test scores of reaction time among the control group, circuit and interval group Kabaddi men

players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups seem to perform better in their

post test. This is illustrated in Graph 4.E

Chapter IV


Circuit and Interval group



mean and standard deviation of the data were calculated and the c

whether there is any relationship between them.The result and c

the Table 4.35

0.27

0.28

0.29

0.3

0.31

0.32

0.33

0.34

0.35

0.36

Pre Test Post

Test

Control Group

0.33

0.32


137

Graph 4.E

pre test and post test scores of reaction time among the Control,


between circuit group and interval group in reaction time

o relation between circuit group and interval group in reaction time, the

tandard deviation of the data were calculated and the co relation

whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation

Post

Test

Pre Test Post

Test

Pre Test Post

Test

Control Group Circuit Interval

0.32

0.36

0.3

0.34

0.31

Reaction Time


Control Group Post Test

Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


scores of reaction time among the Control,

group in reaction time, the

o relation were computed to see

o relation coefficient are shown in



Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


138

Table 4.35

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in reaction time of pre test and post test



0.19 0.41 Interval 20 0.34 0.06


0.19 0.41 Interval 20 0.34 0.06



interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- reaction time is accepted.

4.2.6 ABDOMINAL STRENGTH ENDURANCE


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to level of abdominal

strength endurance( bent knee sit ups) is given in Table 4.36

Table 4.36

Level of abdominal strength endurance (bent knee sit ups) of college men of different group

Kabaddi players in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

Average 10 50.0* 10 50.0* 10 50.0*

High 5 25.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

Post Test

Low 6 25.0 5 25.0 6 30.0

Average 8 40.0* 9 45.0* 8 40.0*

High 6 30.0 6 30.0 6 30.0

* indicates the level of abdominal strength endurance

Table 4.36 reveals that in the post test the level of abdominal strength endurance (bent knee sit ups)

is higher in circuit group (45%) than the control and interval group.


139

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on abdominal strength endurance (bent

knee sit ups) of college men Kabaddi players.



training on abdominal strength endurance (bent knee sit ups) of college men Kabaddi players in

Kerala. The summary of analysis of variance over pre test(x) and post test (y) scores of players in

the control, circuit and interval groups taken separately is given in Table 4.37

Table 4.37

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores on abdominal strength

endurance among the Control, Circuit and Interval group


Among group mean 2 17.73 1590.43 8.87 795.22 0.42

37.28


Total 59 1208.98 2806.18


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00




to pre test in abdominal strength endurance (bent knee sit ups). The three groups are more or less

equal with regard to pre test scores of abdominal strength endurance.



significantly with regard to post test abdominal strength endurance.




140

Table 4.38

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on abdominal strength

endurance (bent knee sit ups) among players in experimental (circuit and interval) and

control groups (ANCOVA).


Among group mean 2 17.73 1590.43 3.93 1599.46 799.73

529.85


Total 58 1208.98 2806.18 1164.78 1683.98


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 529.85



have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of abdominal strength endurance (bent

knee sit ups).


given in Table 4.39

Table 4.39



MYX(adj)

Control 20 35.15 37.65 37.60



Groups Means 20 35.1 43.925


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67


141





Table 4.40


groups


Control 37.60 12.65 S


Control 37.60 6.28 S


circuit 50.25 6.37 S

interval 43.88





adjusted means (Myx ) circuit and interval training groups =6.37 which is greater than 1.037 implies




respect to abdominal strength endurance i.e., circuit training group(Myx =50.25 is significantly

superior to Control (Myx = 37.60) and interval training group (Myx = 43.88) with regard to their post

test scores.


142

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of abdominal strength endurance (Bent knee sit

ups) among the Control, Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi players





Table 4.41

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of abdominal strength endurance among the



Value

Calculated


Control

Group

Pre Test 35.85 5.18 0.99 17.94 0.00

Post Test 38.20 5.08


0.96 58.74 0.00 Post Test 50.65 4.68


0.94 22.93 0.00 Post Test 45.05 5.41



post test scores of abdominal strength endurance among the control group, circuit and interval group

Kabaddi men players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups seem to perform

better in their post test. This is illustrated in Graph 4.F

Chapter IV


the Control, Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi play



mean and standard deviation of the data were calculated and the co

whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co

the Table 4.42

Relationship between circuit group

Test Group

Pre Circuit

Interval

Post Circuit

Interval


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Pre Test Post

Test

Control Group

35.8538.2

Abdominal Strength Endurance


143

Graph 4.F

pre test and post test scores of abdominal strength endurance among

the Control, Circuit and Interval group Kabaddi play

between circuit group and interval group in abdominal strength endurance

relation between circuit group and interval group in reaction time, the

tandard deviation of the data were calculated and the co relation were computed to see

whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation coefficient are shown in

Table 4.42

between circuit group and interval group in abdominal strength endurance of

pre test and post test


20 35.05 4.63 0.08

20 35.95 5.03

20 50.65 4.68 0.13

20 45.05 5.41


Post Pre Test Post

Test

Pre Test Post

Test

Circuit Interval

38.235.05

50.65

35.95

45.05




Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


scores of abdominal strength endurance among


in abdominal strength endurance

group in reaction time, the

relation were computed to see

relation coefficient are shown in

and interval group in abdominal strength endurance of


0.74

0.58




Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


144


interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- abdominal strength endurance is

accepted.

4.3 Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on selected physiological variables


Inorder to findout the effectiveness of the circuit training and interval training on seleccted

physiological variables such as resting heart rate and vital capacity of college men Kabaddi players,

the collected data were analysed and the details of analysis of each variable is given below:

4.3.1 RESTING HEART RATE


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to the level of resting heart

rate is given in Table 4.43

Table 4.43

Level of resting heart rate of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 7 35.0* 5 25.0

Average 7 35.0 6 30.0 6 30.0

High 8 40.0* 7 35.0* 9 45.0*

Post Test

Low 5 25.0 5 25.0 7 35.0*

Average 7 35.0 8 40.0* 7 35.0*

High 8 40.0* 7 35.0 6 30.0

* indicates the level of resting heart rate

Table 4.43 shows that in the post test the level of resting heart rate is higher in circuit group (40%)

than the control and interval group.


145

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on resting heart rate of college men

Kabaddi players.



training on resting heart rate of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The summary of analysis of



Table 4.44

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores on resting heart rate among

the Control, Circuit and Interval group


Among group mean 2 2.63 328.03 1.32 164.02 0.21

25.20


Total 59 364.98 698.98


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00




to pre test in resting heart rate. The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test scores

of resting heart rate.

The obtained value of Fy is 25.20 (Fy = 25.20). It is greater than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00).Hence

it can be interpreted that the experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control group differ

significantly with regard to post test in resting heart rate.




146

Table 4.45

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on resting heart rate

among players in experimental (circuit and interval) and control groups (ANCOVA).


Among group mean 2 2.63 328.03 -29.28 381.90 190.95

181.77


Total 58 364.98 698.98 307.02 440.73


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 181.77


(i.e, =5.00). This shows that the final mean scores of treatment groups differ significantly after they

have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of resting heart rate.


given in Table 4.46

Table 4.46



MYX(adj)

Control 20 68.40 67.55 67.78

circuit 20 68.90 62.10 61.87

interval 20 68.75 63.30 63.21

Group Means 20 68.65 64.83


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67




147



Table 4.47


groups


Control 67.78 5.91 Sig

circuit 61.87


interval 63.21

circuit 61.87 1.34 Sig

interval 63.21





adjusted means (Myx ) circuit and interval training groups =1.34 which is greater than 0.865 implies




respect to resting heart rate i.e, circuit training group(Myx =61.87) is significantly superior to

control (Myx = 67.78) and interval training group (Myx = 63.21) with regard to their post test scores.

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of resting heart rate among the Control, Circuit

and Interval group Kabaddi players





Chapter IV

Comparison of Pre test and

Group Test

Control

Group

Pre Test

Post Test

Circuit

Group

Pre Test

Post Test

Interval

Group

Pre Test

Post Test


As the p value of the table is less than 0.05, t

post test scores of resting heart rate among the control group, circuit and interval

men players of Kerala. From the

their post test. This is illustrated in


Circuit and Interval grou

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

Control

68


148

Table 4.48

Pre test and post test scores of resting heart rate among the


Mean S.D r

Value

Calculated

‘t’ value

68.00 2.27 0.96 5.81


68.50 2.72 0.95 31.09


68.45 2.60 0.93 27.83



value of the table is less than 0.05, there is significant difference

resting heart rate among the control group, circuit and interval

men players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups seem to perform better in

. This is illustrated in Graph 4.G

Graph 4.G

pre test and post test scores of resting heart rate among the Control,


ControlCircuit

Interval

68.568.45

67.2

62.3 62.85


scores of resting heart rate among the Control, Circuit

Calculated


5.81 0.00

31.09 0.00

27.83 0.00

here is significant difference between pre test and

resting heart rate among the control group, circuit and interval group Kabaddi

ean value it is clear that all the groups seem to perform better in

scores of resting heart rate among the Control,

Pre Test

Post Test


149

Co relation between circuit group and interval group in resting heart rate

Inorder to findout the co relation between circuit group and interval group in resting heart rate ,

the mean and standard deviation of the data were calculated and the co relation were computed to

see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation co efficient are shown

in the Table 4.49

Table 4.49

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in resting heart rate of pre test and

post test



0.42 0.06 Interval 20 68.45 2.60


0.37 0.11 Interval 20 62.85 2.83



interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- resting heart rate is accepted.

4.3.2 VITAL CAPACITY


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to vital capacity is given in

Table 4.50

Table 4.50

Level of vital capacity of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 7 35.0 7 35.0 8 40.0*

Average 8 40.0* 8 40.0* 6 30.0

High 5 25.0 5 25.0 6 30.0

Post Test

Low 6 30.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

Average 9 45.0* 10 50.0* 9 45.0*

High 5 25.0 5 25.0 6 30.0

* indicates the level of Vital Capacity


150

From the table 4.50 it is clear that in the post test the level of vital capacity is higher in circuit group

(50%) than the control and interval group.

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on vital capacity of college men

Kabaddi players.



training on vital capacity of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The summary of analysis of



Table 4.51

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores on vital capacity among the



Among group mean 2 30140.03 710765.23 15070.02 355382.62 0.24

5.94


Total 59 3583545.33 4121470.98


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

The F ratio for the pre test and post test scores was tested for significance. Fx value obtained 0.

24 (Fx = 0.24). it is less than F at 0.05 level( i.e, 3.16). So it can be interpreted that the experimental

groups (circuit and interval) and control group do not differ significantly with regard to pre testin

vital capacity. The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test scores of vital

capacity.

The obtained value of Fy is 5.94 (Fy = 5.94). It is greater than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00).Hence it

can be interpreted that the experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control group differ

significantly with regard to post test vital capacity.


151



Table 4.52

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on vital capacity among


Source of


Among group

mean 2 30140.03 710765.23 93890.57 557314.33 278657.17

105.80

Within group

mean 56 3553405.30 3410705.75 3405221.10 147489.27 2633.74 51.32

Total 58 3583545.33 4121470.98 3499111.67 704803.60


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 105.80


(i.e,=5.00). this shows that the final mean scores of treatment groups differ significantly after they

have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of vital capacity.


given in Table 4.53

Table 4.53



MYX(adj)

Control 20 2162.55 2213.00 2231.95

circuit 20 2202.10 2478.05 2459.10

interval 20 2149.35 2370.40 2402.00

Group means 20 2182.33 2345.53


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;


152

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67

Minimum significant difference required at 0 .01 =43.33




Table 4.54


groups

Difference between adjusted means (Myx ) of control and circuit training groups =227.15 which


between adjusted means (Myx ) of control and interval training groups =170.05 which is greater

than 43.33 implies that the both the groups differ significantly at 0.01 level and difference between





respect to vital capacity i.e., circuit training group(Myx =2459.1) is significantly superior to control

(Myx = 2231.95) and interval training group (Myx = 2402.0) with regard to their post test scores.


Control 2231.95 227.15 Sig

circuit 2459.10

Control 2231.95 170.05 Sig

interval 2402.00

circuit 2459.10 57.10 Sig

interval 2402.00


153

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of vital capacity among the Control, Circuit and






Table 4.55

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of vital capacity among the Control, Circuit and



Value

Calculated


Control

Group

Pre Test 2176.55 235.07 0.99 14.07 0.00

Post Test 2220.00 238.19


0.96 17.88 0.00 Post Test 2469.55 237.55


0.97 17.05 0.00 Post Test 2390.90 251.31



post test scores of vital capacity among the control group, circuit and interval group Kabaddi men

players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups seem to perform better in their

post test. This is illustrated in Graph 4.H

Chapter IV





whether there is any relationship between them.The result and c

the Table 4.56

2000

2050

2100

2150

2200

2250

2300

2350

2400

2450

2500

Pre Test Post

Test

Control Group

2176.55

2220


154

Graph 4.H

pre test and post test scores of vital capacity among the Control, Circuit


between circuit group and interval group in vital capacity

o relation between circuit group and interval group in vital capacity, the

of the data were calculated and the co relation

whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation

Post

Test

Pre Test Post

Test

Pre Test Post

Test


22202195.85

2469.55

2162.95

2390.9

Vital Capacity



Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


scores of vital capacity among the Control, Circuit

group in vital capacity, the

o relation were computed to see

o relation coefficient are shown in



Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


155

Table 4.56

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in vital capacity of pre test and post test


Pre Circuit 20 2195.85 255.43

0.25 0.27 Interval 20 2162.95 242.02

Post Circuit 20 2469.55 237.55

0.41 0.07 Interval 20 2390.90 251.31



interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- vital capacity is accepted.

4.4 Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on selected psychological variables


Inorder to findout the effectiveness of the circuit training and interval training on seleccted

psychological variables such as general anxiety, self confidence and achievement motivation of

college men Kabaddi players, the collected data were analysed and the details of analysis of each

variable is given below:

4.4.1 GENERAL ANXIETY


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to the level of general anxiety

is given in Table 4.57


156

Table 4.57

Level of general anxiety of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 6 30.0 5 25.0

Average 9 45.0* 6 30.0 5 25.0

High 6 30.0 8 40.0* 10 50.0*

Post Test

Low 7 35.0* 5 25.0 5 25.0

Average 6 35.0* 7 35.0 7 35.0

High 6 30.0 8 40.0* 9 45.0*

* indicates the level of general anxiety

Table 4.57 reveals that in the post test the level of general anxiety is higher in circuit and interval

training group than the control group.

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on general anxiety of college men

Kabaddi players.



training general anxiety of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The summary of analysis of



Table 4.58

Summary of Analysis of Variance of Pre test and post test scores on general anxiety among

the Control, Circuit and Interval group

Source of

Variance df SSx SSy MSx(Vx) MSy(Vy) Fx Fy

Among

group mean 2 54.70 44.43 27.35 22.22

0.98

0.86

Within

group mean 57 1598.70 1464.55 28.05 25.69

Total 59 1653.40 1508.98


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00


157




to pre testin general anxiety. The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test scores

of general anxiety.



significantly with regard to post test in general anxiety.



Table 4.59

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on general anxiety among


Source of


Among group

mean 2 54.70 44.43 -49.30 180.95 90.48

190.53

Within group

mean 56 1598.70 1464.55 1516.20 26.59 0.47 0.69

Total 58 1653.40 1508.98 1466.90 207.55


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 190.53



have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of general anxiety.


given in Table 4.60


158

Table 4.60



MYX(adj)

Control 20 30.75 29.40 30.37

circuit 20 32.80 27.55 26.58

interval 20 32.75 27.60 26.68

Group Means 20 31.78 28.48


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67


Minimum significant difference required at 0 .05 = 0.44



Table 4.61


groups

MYX (adj) Difference RM


circuit 26.58


interval 26.68

circuit 26.58 0.10 Not sig

interval 26.68






159

adjusted means (Myx ) circuit and interval training groups =0.10 which is less than 0.58 implies that

the both the groups do not differ significantly at 0.01 level.


and Control groups that there is significant difference between experimental and control groups

with respect to general anxiety i.e., circuit training group(Myx =26.58) is significantly superior to

control (Myx = 30.37) and interval training group (Myx = 26.68) with regard to their post test scores.

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of general anxiety among the Control, Circuit and






Table 4.62

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of general anxiety among the Control, Circuit and



Value

Calculated


Control

Group

Pre Test 31.25 5.57 0.99 11.05 0.00



0.96 27.90 0.00 Post Test 26.80 5.30


0.99 27.35 0.00 Post Test 26.60 5.00



post test scores of general anxiety among the control group, circuit and interval group Kabaddi men

players of Kerala.

Chapter IV

From the mean value it is clear that all the group players seem to score more in their pre

than that of their post test which reveals their anxiety level is more before the treatment than that of

after treatment. It clears that the experiment strengthens their mind in such a way that to reduce

their anxiety to a considerable level.





the mean and standard deviation

see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and c

in the Table 4.63

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Pre Test Post Test

Control Group

31.2529.75


160

From the mean value it is clear that all the group players seem to score more in their pre

test which reveals their anxiety level is more before the treatment than that of

treatment. It clears that the experiment strengthens their mind in such a way that to reduce

xiety to a considerable level. This is illustrated in Graph 4.I

Graph 4.I

pre test and post test scores of general anxiety


between circuit group and interval group in general anxiety

o relation between circuit group and interval group

deviation of the data were calculated and the co relation

see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation

Post Test Pre Test Post Test Pre Test Post Test

Circuit Interval

32

26.8

31.65

26.6

General Anxiety


From the mean value it is clear that all the group players seem to score more in their pre test

test which reveals their anxiety level is more before the treatment than that of

treatment. It clears that the experiment strengthens their mind in such a way that to reduce

general anxiety among the Control,

general anxiety

between circuit group and interval group in general anxiety ,

o relation were computed to

o relation coefficient are shown



Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


161

Table 4.63

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in general anxiety of Pre test and post

test



0.03 0.92 Interval 20 31.65 5.37


0.01 0.96 Interval 20 26.60 5.00



interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- general anxiety is accepted.

4.4.2 SELF CONFIDENCE

The pre test and post test scores among control group, circuit training group and Interval

training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to the level of self confidence

is given in Table 4.64

Table 4.64

Level of self confidence of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala


N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 5 25.0 6 30.0 5 25.0

Average 9 45.0* 9 45.0* 7 35.0

High 6 30.0 5 25.0 8 40.0*

Post Test

Low 5 25.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

Average 9 45.0* 10 50.0* 10 50.0*

High 6 30.0 5 25.0 5 25.0

* indicates the level of self confidence

Table 4.64 It is clear that in the post test the level of self confidence is same in interval group and

circuit group (50%) than the control group.


162

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on self confidence of college men

Kabaddi players.



training on self confidence of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The summary of analysis of

variance over pre test(x) and post test(y) scores of players in the control, circuit and interval groups


Table 4.65

Summary of analysis of variance of pre test and post test scores on self confidence among the

control, circuit and interval group


Among group mean 2 17.43 130.43 8.72 65.22 0.31

2.46


Total 59 1634.18 1642.18


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00




to Pre testin self confidence. The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test scores

of self confidence.

The obtained value of Fy is 2.46 (Fy = 2.46). It is less than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00). Hence it

can be interpreted that the experimental groups(circuit and interval) and control group do not differ

significantly with regard to post test in self confidence.




163

Table 4.66

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on self confidence among


Source of


Among group

mean 2 17.43 130.43 -45.47 229.82 114.91

103.71

Within group

mean 56 1616.75 1511.75 1530.95 62.05 1.11 1.05

Total 58 1634.18 1642.18 1485.48 291.87


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 103.71



have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of self confidence.


given in Table 4.67

Table 4.67



MYX(adj)

Control 20 35.60 36.70 36.08

circuit 20 34.30 39.90 40.52

interval 20 34.75 39.75 39.94

G.MEANS 20 34.95 38.30


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67



164




Table 4.68


groups

Difference between adjusted means (Myx ) of Control and Circuit training groups =4.431 which


between adjusted means (Myx ) of Control and Interval training groups =3.855 which is greater than


adjusted means (Myx ) circuit and interval training groups =0.576 which is less than 0.889 implies

that the both the groups do not differ significantly at 0.01 level.



respect to self confidence i.e, circuit training group(Myx =40.52) is significantly superior to control

(Myx = 36.08) and interval training group (Myx =39.94) with regard to their post test scores.

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of self confidence among the Control, Circuit and






circuit 40.52


interval 39.94

circuit 40.52 0.576 Not Sig

interval 39.94


165



Table 4.69

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of self confidence among the Control, Circuit and



Value

Calculated


Control

Group

Pre Test 35.45 5.52 0.99 8.23 0.00



0.93 32.90 0.00 Post Test 38.95 5.96


0.99 8.53 0.00 Post Test 40.25 5.98


As the p value of the table is less than 0.05, there is significant difference between pre test

and post test scores of reaction time among the control group, circuit and interval group Kabaddi

men players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the groups seem to have more self

confidence scores in post test than that of the pre test. The above findings revealed that the

treatment given to the players and various training made the individual to have more self confidence

than that of the before the training programmes. This is illustrated in Graph 4.J

Chapter IV




the mean and standard deviation

see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and c

in the Table 4.70

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

Pre Test Post

Test

Control Group

35.45

36.4


166

Graph 4.J

pre test and post test scores of self confidence among the Control, Circuit


between circuit group and interval group in self confidence


deviation of the data were calculated and the co relation

see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation

Post

Test

Pre Test Post

Test

Pre Test Post

Test


36.4

33.9

38.95

35.5

40.25

Self Confidence



Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


among the Control, Circuit

self confidence

between circuit group and interval group in self confidence ,

o relation were computed to

o relation coefficient are shown



Circuit Pre Test

Circuit Post Test

Interval Pre Test

Interval Post Test


167

Table 4.70

Relationship between circuit group and interval group in self confidence of Pre test and

post test



0.41 0..06 Interval 20 35.50 6.82


0.35 0.12 Interval 20 40.25 5.98



interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- self confidence is accepted.

4.4.3 ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION


training group of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala with respect to level of achievement

motivation is given in Table 4.71

Table 4.71

Level of achievement motivation of college men of different group Kabaddi players in Kerala

Test Level Control Group Circuit Group

Interval

Group

N % N % N %

Pre Test

Low 9 45.0* 7 35.0* 5 25.0

Average 6 30.0 6 30.0 8 40.0*

High 5 25.0 7 35.0* 7 35.0

Post Test

Low 5 25.0 5 25.0 7 35.0*

Average 9 45.0* 10 50.0* 6 30.0

High 6 30.0 5 25.0 7 35.0*

* indicates the level of achievement motivation

Table 4.71 shows that in the post test the level of achievement motivation is higher in circuit group

(50%) than the control and interval group.


168

Effectiveness of Circuit training and Interval training on achievement motivation of college

men Kabaddi players.



training on achievement motivation of college men Kabaddi players in Kerala. The summary of

analysis of variance over pre test(x) and post test (y) scores of players in the control, circuit and

interval groups taken separately is given in Table 4.72

Table 4.72

Summary of analysis of variance of pre test and post test scores on achievememt motivation

among the control, circuit and interval group

Source of

Variance df SSx SSy MSx(Vx) MSy(Vy) Fx Fy

Among group

mean 2.00 99.23 332.23 49.62 166.12

2.42

9.23

Within group

mean 57.00 1170.70 1025.95 20.54 18.00

Total 59.00 1269.93 1358.18


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00


2.42 (Fx = 2.42). It is less than F at 0.05 level ( i.e, 3.16). So it can be interpreted that the


to Pre testin achievement motivation. The three groups are more or less equal with regard to pre test

scores of achievement motivation

The obtained value of Fy is 9.23 (Fy = 9.23). It is greater than F at 0.01 level (i.e, 5.00).Hence it

can be interpreted that the experimental groups (circuit and interval) and control group differ

significantly with regard to post test in achievement motivaton.




169

Table 4.73

Summary of Analysis of Co variance of Pre test and post test scores on achievement

motivation among players in experimental (circuit and interval) and control groups

(ANCOVA).

Source of


Among group

mean 2 99.23 332.23 171.13 117.96 58.98

10.81

Within group

mean 56 1170.70 1025.95 918.30 305.63 5.46 2.34

Total 58 1269.93 1358.18 1089.43 423.59


F at 0.05 level = 3. 16

F at 0.01 level = 5.00

Fyx = 10.81



have been adjusted for differences in the post test scores of achievement motivation.


given in Table 4.74

Table 4.74



MYX(adj)

Control 20 35.40 35.95 36.56

Circuit 20 36.95 40.30 39.69

Interval 20 38.55 41.40 39.54

Group Means 20 36.175 38.125


‘t’ at 0.05=2.005;

‘t’ at 0.01=2.67



170




Table 4.75

Difference between adjusted means (Myx) of experimental (Circuit and interval) and Control

groups



circuit 39.69


interval 39.54

circuit 39.69 0.155 Not Sig

interval 39.54

Difference between adjusted means (Myx ) of Control and Circuit training groups =3.134 which


between adjusted means (Myx ) of Control and Interval training groups =2.979 which is greater

than 1.973 implies that the both the groups differ significantly at 0.01 level and difference between

adjusted means (Myx ) Circuit and Interval training groups =0.155 which is less than 1.973 implies

that the both the groups do not differ significantly at 0.01 level



respect to achievement motivation i.e., circuit training group(Myx =39.69) is significantly superior

to Control (Myx = 36.56) and interval training group (Myx = 39.54) with regard to their post test

scores.


171

Comparison of pre test and post test scores of achievement motivation among the Control,






Table 4.76

Comparison of Pre test and post test scores of achievement motivation among the Control,



Value

Calculated


Control

Group

Pre Test 35.60 5.32 0.94 2.94 0.01



0.66 5.22 0.00 Post Test 40.65 4.24


0.94 7.10 0.00 Post Test 41.70 4.20


As the p value of the table is less than 0.05, there is significant difference between pre test

and post test scores of achievement motivation among the control group, circuit and interval group

Kabaddi men players of Kerala. From the mean value it is clear that all the group players are seem

to score better in the post test than that of pre test in achievement motivation. This is illustrated in

Graph 4.K

Chapter IV





motivation , the mean and standard deviation



Relationship between circuit group

Test Group

Pre Circuit

Interval

Post Circuit

Interval


32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

Control

35.6

36.8


172

Graph 4.K

pre test and post test scores of achievement motivation among the


between circuit group and interval group in achievement motivation




Table 4.77

Table 4.77

between circuit group and interval group in achievement motivation of

test and post test


20 36.70 4.00 0.15

20 39.20 4.78

20 40.65 4.24 0.34

20 41.70 4.20


Circuit Interval

36.7

39.2

36.8

40.65

41.7


scores of achievement motivation among the


achievement motivation

between circuit group and interval group in achievement

of the data were calculated and the co relation were

computed to see whether there is any relationship between them.The result and co relation

and interval group in achievement motivation of pre


0.52

0.17

Pre Test

Post Test


173


interval training will have a positive co relation with variable- achievement motivation is accepted.

analysis and interpretation of data -...

Documents