analog vs. digital hadron calorimetry for the...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Analog vs. DigitalAnalog vs. DigitalHadronHadron CalorimetryCalorimetry
for the ILCfor the ILCDhiman Chakraborty
for the NIU/NICADD ILC detector group
International Linear ColliderLarge Detector Meeting
LLR, Paris, January 13-15, 2005
![Page 2: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 2
IntroductionIntroduction
We consider a hadronic calorimeter with a few thresholds (1-3).Compare gas and scintillator as live media:
Single particle energy resolution,Shower width,Clustering.
![Page 3: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 3
Geometries ConsideredGeometries Considered
Scint HCal
Steel 20mmPolystyrene 5mm
Gas Geom1
Steel 20mm
Gas 5mm
Gas Geom2
G10
Glass 1mm
Gas 1mm
![Page 4: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 4
Number of cells hit by Number of cells hit by ππ++s of s of 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 GeV2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 GeV
![Page 5: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 5
ππ++ energy resolution as function of energy resolution as function of energy for different (linear) cell sizesenergy for different (linear) cell sizes
![Page 6: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 6
EEnergy resolution for 10 GeV nergy resolution for 10 GeV ππ++ss
σ/E=0.183 σ/N=0.166
9cm2 cells
![Page 7: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 7
EEnergy resolution for 50 GeV nergy resolution for 50 GeV ππ++ss
σ/E=0.101 σ/N=0.153
9cm2 cells
![Page 8: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 8
Nhit Nhit correlations for different correlations for different cell energy thresholdscell energy thresholds
![Page 9: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 9
Nhit correlations for different cell Nhit correlations for different cell energy thresholdsenergy thresholds
![Page 10: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 10
Nhit correlations for different cell Nhit correlations for different cell energy thresholdsenergy thresholds
![Page 11: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 11
Alternatively,Alternatively,
![Page 12: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12
CompensationCompensation
Cell counting has its own version of the compensation problem (in scintillators).With multiple threshold this can be overcome by weighting cells differently (according to the threshold they passed).In MC, 3 thresholds seem to be adequate
![Page 13: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 13
After semiAfter semi--digital treatmentdigital treatment
![Page 14: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 14
Energy resolution:Energy resolution: 5050 GeV GeV ππ++ss
σ/E=0.101 σ/E=0.092
![Page 15: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 15
Energy resolution: 10 GeV Energy resolution: 10 GeV ππ++ss
σ/E=0.183 σ/N=0.164
![Page 16: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 16
ππ++ energy resolution vs. energyenergy resolution vs. energy
![Page 17: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 17
Time of flightTime of flight
![Page 18: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 18
ToF dependenceToF dependence
![Page 19: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 19
CrossCross--talktalk(10% of cell E leaks equally to 4 neighbors)
![Page 20: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 20
Nhit vs. fraction of Nhit vs. fraction of ππ++ E in cells with E>10 MIP:E in cells with E>10 MIP:1cm1cm x 1cm x 1cm scintillator cellsscintillator cells
![Page 21: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 21
Nhit vs. fraction of Nhit vs. fraction of ππ++ E in cells with E>10 MIP:E in cells with E>10 MIP:GasGas vs. scintillatorvs. scintillator
![Page 22: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 22
ππ++ energy resolution vs. energyenergy resolution vs. energyM
ultip
le th
resh
olds
not
use
d
![Page 23: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 23
NonNon--linearitylinearityNhit/GeV varies with energy.This will introduce additional pressure on the “constant” term.For scintillator the non-linearity can be effectively removed by “semi-digital” treatment.
![Page 24: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 24
Density of hitsDensity of hits
Need a hierarchy in the absence of an energy measurementLocal density of hits is an obvious candidate. A simple-minded density variable:
di = Σ (1/Rij),where Rij is the angular distance between cells i & j.
![Page 25: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 25
Position resolutionPosition resolutionM
easu
red
rela
tive
to th
e en
ergy
wei
ghte
d re
solu
tions
unweighted
Density weightedEnergy weighted
![Page 26: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 26
Density vs. Density vs. EnergyEnergy
![Page 27: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 27
WidthWidthFind centroid {Σwixi/Σwi}‘width’ = sqrt(ΣwiR2
i/Σwi)Three weights were used:
Unweighted (wi=1)
Energy weighted (wi=Ei)
Density weighted (wi=nearest-neighbor occupancy in a 5x5 window in lyrs k-1,k,k+1)
![Page 28: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 28
Distance to Distance to farthestfarthest cellcell
![Page 29: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 29
Density Density of farthestof farthest cellcell
![Page 30: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 30
Distance to farthest cellDistance to farthest cell
![Page 31: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 31
Density of farthest cellDensity of farthest cell
![Page 32: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 32
BackscatterBackscatter
![Page 33: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 33
Shower Shower widthwidth for 10GeVfor 10GeV ππ±±
![Page 34: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 34
Shower width for 50GeVShower width for 50GeV ππ±±
![Page 35: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 35
π± angular widthrms shown as bars
![Page 36: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 36
ππ±± angular width: energy weightedangular width: energy weighted
![Page 37: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 37
ππ±± angular width: density weightedangular width: density weighted
![Page 38: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 38
CommentsCommentsThere is no clear cut case either way at the moment; detailed studies of assessing impact needed.Will look at cluster separability next.Need to evaluate this in the global context of calorimeter performance.
![Page 39: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 39
ClusteringClusteringClustering based on local densityworks well.It is an alternative to track-seeded clustering.Can be used in the ECal and HCal.Full PFlow implementation givesencouraging results.
![Page 40: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 40
10 GeV10 GeV ππ0 0 →→ γγγγD
ensi
ty w
eigh
ted
θ−φ
![Page 41: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 41
ΣΣ++ →→ ppππ0 0 →→ ppγγγγ
p
π0
Den
sity
wei
ghte
dθ−
φ
![Page 42: Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILCnicadd.niu.edu/presentations/Dhiman_niu_dhcal_050113.pdf · 2005. 1. 28. · Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 12](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070212/61084a8d6962b27558659cea/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
ILC LD meeting, 14-01-2005
Analog vs. Digital HCal for ILC Dhiman Chakraborty 42
SummarySummaryLarge parameter space in the nbit-segmentation-medium plane for hadron calorimetry. Optimization through cost-benefit analysis?Scintillator and Gas-based ‘digital’ HCalsbehave differently.Need to simulate detector effects (noise, x-talk, non-linearities, etc.)Need verification in test-beam data.More studies underway.