an overview of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

9
International Journal of Infectious and Tropical Diseases Volume 1 Issue 2 www.ijitd.com © Michael Joanna Publications Review Article This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial, share-alike use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. An overview of invasive fungal infections in immuno- compromised hosts Dash M*, Chayani N, Sarangi G Department of Microbiology, Sriram Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Utkal University, Cuttack, Odisha, India. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 16.09.14; Accepted: 24.10.14; Published: 24.10.14 INTRODUCTION During last three decades, the frequency of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in immunocompromised (IC) hosts has increased remarkably and associated with excessive morbidity and mortality. This is mainly related to advances in the medical care, thereby increasing the number of at- risk immunocompromised populations. Majority of IFIs are due to opportunistic fungal pathogens that are commonly found in soil, water, plant debris, and other organic substrates. Major risk factors for IFIs include neutropenia < 500 neutrophils/ml for more than 10 days, solid organ transplantation, blood and bone marrow transplantation, neoplastic diseases including haematological malignancies, chemotherapy, HIV infection, prolonged systemic therapy with corticosteroids and ABSTRACT Background: With the advances in medical care, invasive fungal infections possess a significant health problem especially in immunocompromised patients. These infections have varied aetiological agents which are commonly found in soil, water, plant debris and organic substrates. Aim: The overview of different fungal aetiological agents, newer and rapid diagnostic modalities and overall treatment and prevention options available is presented in this article. Methods: Literature search was performed in PubMed by using MeSH terms ‘mycoses’ and ‘immunocompromised host’. Only relevant review articles published within the last five years were considered. Google Scholar search engine was also used. Results: Common invasive fungi include Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., Aspergillus spp., Trichosporon spp., Rhodotorula spp., Fusarium spp., Mucormycotina, Pheohyphomycosis spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii, Scedosporium spp., and endemic mycoses such as Penicillium, Histoplasma and Blastomyces. A high degree of suspicion is required for early diagnosis and optimal management of these infections. Conclusion: Early and rapid diagnosis of causative fungal agents is required so that appropriate treatment can be initiated. Adequate preventive measures must be applied in an immunocompromised host that can prevent development of drug resistant super-infections. Key words: Invasive fungal infections, immunocompromised patients, rapid diagnosis, treatment, prevention

Upload: dr-muktikesh-dash-md-pgdfm

Post on 01-Jun-2015

132 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

DESCRIPTION

ABSTRACT Background: With the advances in medical care, invasive fungal infections possess a significant health problem especially in immunocompromised patients. These infections have varied aetiological agents which are commonly found in soil, water, plant debris and organic substrates. Aim: The overview of different fungal aetiological agents, newer and rapid diagnostic modalities and overall treatment and prevention options available is presented in this article. Methods: Literature search was performed in PubMed by using MeSH terms ‘mycoses’ and ‘immunocompromised host’. Only relevant review articles published within the last five years were considered. Google Scholar search engine was also used. Results: Common invasive fungi include Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., Aspergillus spp., Trichosporon spp., Rhodotorula spp., Fusarium spp., Mucormycotina, Pheohyphomycosis spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii, Scedosporium spp., and endemic mycoses such as Penicillium, Histoplasma and Blastomyces. A high degree of suspicion is required for early diagnosis and optimal management of these infections. Conclusion: Early and rapid diagnosis of causative fungal agents is required so that appropriate treatment can be initiated. Adequate preventive measures must be applied in an immunocompromised host that can prevent development of drug resistant super-infections.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

International Journal of Infectious and Tropical Diseases

Volume 1 Issue 2

www.ijitd.com

© Michael Joanna Publications

Review Article

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial, share-alike use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

An overview of invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Dash M*, Chayani N, Sarangi G

Department of Microbiology, Sriram Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Utkal

University, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Received: 16.09.14; Accepted: 24.10.14; Published: 24.10.14

INTRODUCTION During last three decades, the frequency of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in immunocompromised (IC) hosts has increased remarkably and associated with excessive morbidity and mortality. This is mainly related to advances in the medical care, thereby increasing the number of at-risk immunocompromised populations. Majority of IFIs are due to opportunistic

fungal pathogens that are commonly found in soil, water, plant debris, and other organic substrates.

Major risk factors for IFIs include neutropenia < 500 neutrophils/ml for more than 10 days, solid organ transplantation, blood and bone marrow transplantation, neoplastic diseases including haematological malignancies, chemotherapy, HIV infection, prolonged systemic therapy with corticosteroids and

ABSTRACT

Background: With the advances in medical care, invasive fungal infections possess a significant health problem especially in immunocompromised patients. These infections have varied aetiological agents which are commonly found in soil, water, plant debris and organic substrates. Aim: The overview of different fungal aetiological agents, newer and rapid diagnostic modalities and overall treatment and prevention options available is presented in this article. Methods: Literature search was performed in PubMed by using MeSH terms ‘mycoses’ and ‘immunocompromised host’. Only relevant review articles published within the last five years were considered. Google Scholar search engine was also used. Results: Common invasive fungi include Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., Aspergillus spp., Trichosporon spp., Rhodotorula spp., Fusarium spp., Mucormycotina, Pheohyphomycosis spp., Pneumocystis jirovecii, Scedosporium spp., and endemic mycoses such as Penicillium, Histoplasma and Blastomyces. A high degree of suspicion is required for early diagnosis and optimal management of these infections. Conclusion: Early and rapid diagnosis of causative fungal agents is required so that appropriate treatment can be initiated. Adequate preventive measures must be applied in an immunocompromised host that can prevent development of drug resistant super-infections. Key words: Invasive fungal infections, immunocompromised patients, rapid diagnosis, treatment, prevention

Page 2: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

88

newer immunosuppressive agents. Other risk factors are malnutrition, severe burns, prolonged stays in intensive care units (ICUs), invasive medical procedures, major surgery, advanced age, and premature birth.[1,2]

Well known opportunists like Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillusfumigatus are being reported for causing life threatening systemic infections in IC hosts. New and emerging fungal pathogens that include species of non-albicans Candida, non-neoformans Cryptococcus, Aspergillus other than A. fumigatus, opportunistic yeast-like fungi such as Trichosporon Spp., Rhodotorula Spp., Geotrichum capitatum (Blastoschizomyces capitatus), the zygomycetes such as Fusarium Spp., Acremonium Spp., Scedosporium Spp., Paecilomyces Spp., Trichoderma Spp., and a wide variety of dematiaceous fungi.[3,4,5] Due to complexity of the patients at-risk for infections and the diverse and ever increasing array of fungal pathogens, opportunistic mycoses pose considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.[6] Diagnosis depends upon clinical suspicion and the collection of appropriate material for microscopy, culture, histopathology, antigen detection, molecular tests and imaging. Detection of the infecting fungi is extremely important for proper management of infection due to the less common opportunistic fungi. Some of these fungi are inherently non-susceptible to standard azole or polyene therapy and may require the use of alternative anti-fungal agents.In addition, it may also require surgical management and reversal of underlying impairment of host defences.[7] The overview of different fungal etiological agents, newer and rapid diagnostic modalities and overall treatment and prevention options available is presented in this article. METHODOLOGY Literature search was performed in PubMed by using MeSH terms ‘mycoses’ and ‘immunocompromised host’. Only the relevant review articles published within last five years were considered. Also the Google Scholar search engine was used for the collection of articles.

REVIEW Organisms Candida spp. Candida Spp. is currently one of the five principal causes of nosocomial blood stream infections, especially among patients taking broad spectrum antibiotics for a prolonged period, under immunosuppressive therapy, total parenteral nutrition, patients exposed to multiple invasive procedures, and prolonged hospitalization (> 30 days).[8,9]Although C. albicans is the most common cause of invasive fungal infections, the growing number of new and emerging yeast infections from non-albicansCandida species is increasingly recognised.[5,10] These are C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and rarer isolates such as C. gullermondii, C. pelliculosa, C. krusei, C. kefyr, C. rugosa, C. lusitaniae, C. famata, C. norvegensis and C. dubliniensis.[11]Candida is isolated from 84 to 88 percent of mucocutaneous surfaces in hospitalized patients. Colonization and adhesion leading to biofilm production to the mucosal surface is the most important step in the process of systemic candidiasis. From colonizing Candida Spp. extracellular enzymes such as phospholipases, proteinases and hydrolytic enzymes contribute to host tissue invasion.[12] Candida hyphal forms are also able to release hydrolytic enzymes and can specially invade epithelial and endothelial cells.[13] Clinical diagnosis of invasive Candida infection is difficult, positive blood and sterile fluid can be delayed and yield positive results only in 50 to per cent cases of disseminated infection. Cryptococcus spp. Genus Cryptococcus belongs to basidiomycetes, which contain more than 500 species; only C. neoformans and C. gatti are considered as principal pathogens in IC patients. Primary infection due to C. neoformans that usually acquired by inhalation is common and most of these cases are asymptomatic in the lung. C. neoformans can cause severe form of meningitis and meningo-encephalitis in patients with AIDS and corticosteroid use.[14] Disseminated Cryptococcal infection can cause clinical manifestations in the skin, ocular, soft tissue and bone and joints.

Page 3: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

89

Saprophytic non-neoformans Cryptococci are occasionally reported especially those with advanced stage of HIV infection patients with cancer who are undergoing transplant surgery.[15] These are C. laurentii, C. albidus, C. curvadus, C. humiculus, and C. uniguttulatus.[15] In Cryptococcus Spp. the polysaccharide capsule protects the organism against the host immune system. Other pathogenic factors include melanin production, mannitol secretion, superoxide dismutase, proteases and phospholipases.[16] Aspergillus spp. Aspergillus is ubiquitous, thermophilic filamentous fungi that are transmitted by inhalation of air borne conidia. A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger and A. terreus are commonly associated with human infection. Risk factors to invasive aspergillosis are neutropenia, advanced AIDS, stem cell and organ transplant recipients.[17] Conidial size and high conidia count are factors that affect virulence in Aspergillus Spp. For example A. fumigatus, with small conidia, is the main agent in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.[18] Other pathogenic factors detected in patients with invasive aspergillosis are sensory deprivation (environmental pH), mutational restriction of nutrient acquisition, siderophore, and amino acid biosynthesis, extracellular elastolytic proteases, gliotoxin and hyaronic acid.[19] Clinical manifestation can range from colonization in allergic bronco-pulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) to active disseminated infection including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, cutaneous and wound infection, keratitis and aspergillus sinusitis. Trichosporon spp. Trichosporon genus is one of the basidiomycetous yeast producing septate hyphae, arthroconidia, yeasts and pseudo-hyphae. Trichosporon Spp. can be found in soil, fresh water, and are part of normal flora of the human skin, and gastrointestinal tract.[5] The risk-factors associated with infection are malignant haematological disease, severe burns, AIDS, chronic corticosteroid use, and heart valve surgery.[21]It is second most common cause of yeast fungemia (after Candida Spp.) in patients with malignant haematological disease.[5] The important species causing invasive fungal infections

are T. asahii, T. asteroids, T. cutaneum, T. inkin, T. mucoides, and T. ovoides.[21]

Rhodotorula spp. Genus Rhodotorula, a basidiomycetes yeast which produces carotenoid pigments (yellow to red), multilateral budding cells, rudimentary pseudohyphae and occasionally a faint capsule.[5] Rhodotorula species are environmental fungi that can be found in soil, fresh water, fruit juice, milk, shower curtains and tooth brushes. R. mucilaginosa is the most common cause of fungemia, followed by R. glutinis, and R. minuta.[21] Patient who is undergoing bone marrow transplant, AIDS, previous abdominal surgery, cirrhosis, burns, and autoimmune diseases are at-risk.[22]

Other uncommon yeasts Geotrichum is very similar to Trichosporon yeast.[5] It is rarely present as bloodstream infection or disseminated infection in immunocompromised hosts. Presence of blastoconidia with hyphae differentiates Trichosporon from Geotrichum.[23]

Hansenula anomala (Pichia anomala) yeast has been reported neonatal, paediatric and surgical ICUs, and in IC patients. It can cause a wide range of invasive infections, but fungemia especially associated with a central venous catheter is most common.[24]

Lipophilic Malassazia furfur causes fungemia which is related to lipid infusion in IC patients, but the organism is less virulent than other fungal pathogens.[25]

Fungemia in ICUs and in patients with central venous catheter has been linked to use of live yeast capsules Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. boulardii) which are taken for prevention of diarrhoea.[26]

Fusarium spp. One of the most frequent septate mould causing IFIs reported in immunocompromised patients is due to Fusarium Spp. Three important species clinically identified are F. solani, F. oxysporum, and F. verticillioidis. In IC patients fusarium causes fungemia with or without endocarditis, skin lesions, sinusitis and lung disease.[27]Risk factors for invasive fusariosis include prolonged

Page 4: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

90

neutropenia, and T cell immunodeficiency particularly in stem cell recipients with severe graft versus host disease.[28]

Mucormycotina The subphylum Mucormycotina (formerly Zygomycetes) contains most frequently isolated species such as Mucor, Rhizopus, Rhizomucor, Lichtheimia (previously known as Absidia), Cunninghamella, Berthotella, and Apophysomyceselegans.[29]These opportunistic fungi produce acute rhino-cerebral and pulmonary diseases with thrombosis, infarction and blood vessel invasion. Risk factors include profound and prolonged neutropenia, chronic high dose corticosteroid use, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia, voriconazole prophylaxis in stem cell transplant, tissue iron excess, and previous skin and soft tissue trauma.[30] Rapid growth and affinity to the blood stream, heat tolerance, the production of efficient proteolytic enzymes such as lipases, proteases, glycosidic and lipolytic extracellular enzymes, siderophore production and an efficient iron transport system are pathogenic factors in members of the Zygomycetes family.[1]

Pheohyphomycosis spp. Pheohyphomycosis consists of a group of mycotic infections characterized by the presence of dematiaceous (dark walled) septate hyphae, and sometimes yeast or a combination of both in tissue.[31] They are responsible for subcutaneous and systemic (especially cerebral and pulmonary) infection in IC hosts. Agents associated are Cladophialophora bantiana, Bipolaris hawaiiensis, Exserohilum rostatum, Phialophora Spp., Cladosporium cladosporioides, Exophiala spinifera, and Fonsecea pedrosoi.[32,33]

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumocystis is a genus of unicellular fungi found in respiratory tract of many mammals and humans.[34] It is most common opportunistic infection in persons with HIV, followed by cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressant.[35] Clinical manifestations are pneumonia as well as systemic infection involving lymph nodes, spleen, bone marrow and liver.

Scedosporium spp. Scedosporium Spp. is recently emerging as resistant life threatening opportunistic infection in IC hosts. The commonest sites of infections are lungs, sinuses, bones, joints, eyes and brain. S. apiospermum and S. prolificans are two medically significant species of this genus.[36]

Endemic mycoses in immunocompromised patients Among endemic mycoses, genus Penicillium, Histoplasma and Blastomyces are common in IC patients. Only dimorphic Penicillium species, P.marneffei appears late in the course of HIV infection, usually at CD4 lymphocyte count < 100cells/cumm.[37]

Histoplsmosis caused by Histoplasma capsulatum usually produces acute and chronic pulmonary infections. The other common features like fever with hepatospleenomegaly may be misdiagnosed as visceral leishmaniasis in endemic areas of histoplsmosis. Diagnosis of fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts As clinical manifestations of fungal infections are non-specific, high degree of suspicion is required for early diagnosis and optimal management of these infections. Conventional mycological detection methods include direct microscopic examination, culture of samples, use of chromogenic agar, biochemical analyses, germ tube examination, histopathological examinations using special stains. Although conventional methods are efficient approaches, but these routine methods can require 48 to 72 hours or longer arriving at definitive identification, thus can cause considerable delay in correct patient diagnosis and management. Antigen detection Commercially available ELISA kits for detection of fungal cell wall markers in serum has been reported for galactomannan (GM), mannan and 1,3-beta-D-glucan (BDG). Galactomannan is relatively specific for Aspergillus Spp. and it can also be detected in urine, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and other sterile specimens.[19] For diagnosis of

Page 5: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

91

invasive aspergillosis it has variable sensitivity rates ranging from 30 to 100 per cent and specificity from 38 to 98 per cent.[38,39] Factors the sensitivity and specificity are false positive results in patients treated with beta-lactam antibiotics such as piperacillin-tazobactam, dietary GM in pasta, cereals, and milk and cross reactivity with moulds such as Penicillium Spp. and Paecillomyces Spp.[40] Thus serial testing of patient’s sample is required to achieve acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Mannan is found as a characteristic cell wall component in yeasts especially Candida Spp. The detection of circulating Candida mannan and anti-mannan antibodies has been used as diagnostic marker for invasive candidiasis or candidemia in adult IC patients with neutropenia.[41,42] The overall sensitivity of mannan antigen detection in patients with candidemia has been reported to be between 69 and 90.9 per cent and specificity between 46.2 and 89 per cent when compared to culture as gold standard.[43,44]

1,3-beta-D-glucan (BDG) is present as cell wall polysaccharide in most pathogenic fungi including Candida Spp., Aspergillus Spp., Fusarium Spp., Trichosporon Spp., SaccharomycesSpp., and Acremonium Spp. and it is not species or genus specific for each organism. However, Mucorales, Cryptococcus Spp. and Blastomycesdermatidis which either lack the glucan or produce it at minimal levels.[45] The sensitivity has been reported to be 50 to 100 per cent and specificity 71 to 93 per cent.[,45,46]False positive BDG findings occur in the patients with fungal colonization or mucositis who have received empirical antifungal therapy.[47] The combined use of BDG assay (FungitellTMAssociates of Cape Code Inc., East Falmouth, MA, USA) and GM enzyme immunoassay (PlateliaAspergillusTM EIA; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hemel Hempstead, UK) improves the specificity of diagnosis. Molecular tests Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay constitutes one of the recent progresses in identification of fungal genomics in high-risk immunocompromised patients. Both qualitative and quantitative PCR

methods are available for the detection of fungal DNA. The nested PCR and pan-fungal PCR have sensitivities of 92.8 and 80 per cent and specificities of 94 and 95.6 per cent respectively.[48,49] The quantitative real-time PCR has shown the sensitivity of 100 per cent and the specificity of 97 per cent.[50] Pyrosequencing is another rapid DNA sequencing method that requires novel chemistry to sequence pre-selected regions of the genome to short sequences (> 70 bp).[51] Molecular methods are rapid (within 6 hours) that enable diagnosis during the incubation period, very early stage of infection and prior to bone marrow transplantation. Since opportunistic fungi can cause high morbidity and mortality in IC patients, thus serial tests and more than one method should be employed for early diagnosis. Radiological imaging The radiographic patterns obtained from X-rays, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be useful for detection of both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary IFIs with some degree of certainty. These tests are often non-specific and require the existence of macroscopic lesions which are usually occur late in the course of disease and are markers of poor prognosis. HRCT of chest can detect classic halo sign and macronodules are considered as early indicators of invasive disease.[52,53] Treatment with antifungal drugs based on these non-specific early CT findings have been associated with improved survival.[54]Serial HRCT in neutropenic patients has shown to be more sensitive than single test in non-neutropenic patients.[54] Treatment and prevention The early and prompt initiation of antifungal treatment is most crucial in the outcome for the patient. It has been reported that in Candidemia infections a 20 per cent increase in mortality if there was more than 12 hour have elapsed in antifungal treatment after positive blood culture result and the mortality rate increases significantly on each of the following three days.[55] The treatment of fungal infections depends on the type of infection and its

Page 6: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

92

etiologic agent. Also the antifungal agents have varying spectrums of activity, dosing, safety profiles and costs. Broadly, the systemic antifungal agents have grouped into azoles (i.e., fluconazole, voriconazole), polyenes (i.e., amphotericin B deoxycholate, amphotericin lipid formulations and liposomal amphotericin B) and echinocandins (i.e., caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin).[56] The echinocandins exhibit potent in vitro and in vivo fungicidal activity against Candida species, including azole-resistant pathogens and are approved for the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis, Candidemia and other select forms of invasive candidiasis.[57]

To improve outcomes for patients with invasive fungal infections, complimenting strategies such as immunomodulators and combination therapies can be used.[28] Adjunctive interferon gamma could be suggested for refractory cryptococcosis.[28] Combination therapy is highly recommended for candida endocarditis, cryptococcal meningitis and other difficult to treat cases.[5]

To prevent infection in IC patients, exposure to fungal spores must be limited with high-efficiency particulate air filters and positive pressure ventilation in the patient’s room. Also high-risk patients should avoid contact with soil, tap water and shower facilities.[58] Decreasing the duration of neutropenia or discontinuing immunosuppressive agents should be considered in efforts to prevent infection. Adequate information about susceptibility pattern of current fungi that are prevalent in a particular area should be available. Routine monitoring of serum concentrations of antifungal agents are required to know the efficacy and toxicity of antifungals by using high performance liquid chromatography and bioassay methods. This may also prevent the development of drug resistance. Antifungal prophylaxis is recommended for high-risk patients undergoing pancreas, liver, and small bowel transplantations, for chemotherapy induced neutropenic patients, haemopoitic stem cell transplantation recipients with neutropenia and adults admitted in ICUs who are at risk for developing candidiasis.[5]

CONCLUSION The best approach to optimal management of fungal infection in IC patients is early detection and identification of causative fungus, so that appropriate treatment can be initiated as soon as possible. Regular surveillance testing combined with clinical and radiological information is required to arrive at early diagnosis. The message to both clinicians and clinical microbiologists is that there are no uniformly non-pathogenic fungi.[6] Any fungus can cause a lethal infection in an IC host,[6] and should never be rejected as a contaminant provided they are detected from sterile specimen in sterile condition. Broad and injudicious use of any anti-infective agent in a severely IC host may result in superinfections due to organisms that are both unusual and drug resistant.[7,59]

REFERENCES 1. Ribes JA, Vanover-Sams CL, Baker DJ. Zygomycetes in human disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:236-301. 2. Baddley JW. Clinical risk factors for invasive aspergillosis. Med Mycol 2011;49:S7-S12. 3. Enoch DA, Ludlam HA, Brown NM. Invasive fungal infections: a review of epidemiology and management options. J Med Microbiol 2006;55:809-18. 4. Pagano L, Akova M, Dimopoulos G, Herbrecht R, Drgona L, Blijlevens N. Risk assessment and prognostic factors for mould-related diseases in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:i5-i14. 5. Miceli MH, Diaz JA, Lee SA. Emerging opportunistic yeast infections. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:142-51. 6. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Rare and Emerging Opportunistic Fungal Pathogens: Concern for Resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:4419-31. 7. Walsh TJ, Groll A, Hiemenz J, Flemming R, Roilides E, Anaissie E. Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004;10:44-66. 8. Das R, Ranganathan R. An overview of changing trends in systemic

Page 7: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

93

fungal infections. Webmed Central Microbiology 2012;3:WMC003386. 9. Sachin C.D, Ruchi K, Santosh S. In vitro evaluation of proteinase,phospholipase and haemolysin activities of Candida species isolated from clinical specimens. Int J Med Biomed Res 2012;1:153-157. 10. Deorukhkar SC, Saini S, Mathew S. Prospectives on antifungal susceptibility testing in Candida. Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1:50-9. 11. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Meis JF, Gould IM, Fu W, Colombo AL, Rodriquez-Noriega E. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2005 an 8.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:1735-45. 12. Oksuz S, Sahin I, Yildirim M, Gulcan A, Yavuz T, Kaya D, Koc AN. Phospholipase and proteinases activities in different Candida species isolated from anatomically distinct sites of healthy adults. Jpn J Infect Dis 2007;60:280-3. 13. Dalle F, Wächtler B, L’Ollivier C, Holland G, Bannert N, Wilson D, Labruėre C, Bonnin A, Hube B. Cellular interactions of Candida albicans with human oral epithelial cells and enterocytes. Cell Microbiol 2010;12:248-71. 14. Lin X. Cryptococcus neoformans: morphogenesis, infection and evolution. Infect Genet Evol 2009;9:401-16. 15. Khawcharoenporn T. Apisamthanarak A. Mundy LM. Non-neoformans Cryptococcal infections: a systemic review. Infection 2007;35:51-8. 16. Buchmann KL, Murphy JW. What makes Cryptococcus neoformans a pathogen? Emerg Infect Dis 1998;4:71-83. 17. Fouad L, Fathi MS, ElMaraghy AA. The clinical relevance of Aspergillus isolation from respiratory tract samples and detection of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in serum of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Nat Sci 2013;11:40-3. 18. Hedayati MT, Pasqualotto AC, Warn PA, Bowyer P, Denning DW. Aspergillus flavus: human pathogens, allergens and mycotoxin producer. Microbiology 2007;153:1677-92. 19. Badiee P, Hashemizadeh Z. Opportunistic invasive fungal infections:

diagnosis and clinical management. Indian J Med Res 2014;139:195-204. 20. Girmenia C, Pagano L, Martino B, D’Antonio D, Fanci R, Specchia G, Melillo L, Buelli M, Pizzarelli G, Venditti M, Martino P. Invasive infections caused by Trichosporon species and Geotrichum capitatum in patients with haematological malignancies: a retrospective multicentre study from Italy and review of the literature. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:1818-28. 21. Fleming RV, Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ. Emerging and less common fungal pathogens. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2002;16:915-33. 22. Tuon FF, Costa SF. Rhodotorula infection. A systemic review of 128 cases from literature. Rev Iberoam Micol 2008;25:135-40. 9. 23. Larone DH. Medically important fungi- A Guide to Identification, 3rd ed., ASM Press, Washington DC, 1995. 24. Bakir M, Cerikeioğlu N, Tirtir A, Berrak S, Ozek E, Canpolat C. Pichia anomala fungemia in immunocompromised children. Mycoses 2004;47:231-5. 25. Morrison VA, Weisdorf DJ. The spectrum of Malassazia infections in bone marrow transplant population. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;26:645-8. 26. Muñoz P, Bouza E, Cuenca-Estrella M,E iros JM, Pérez J, Sánchez-Somolinos M, Rincón C, Hortal J, Peláez T. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia: an emerging infectious disease. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:1625-34. 27. Nunes Mdo CP, Barbosa FBL, Gomes GHM, Braulio R, Nicoliello MF, Ferrari TCA. Fatal right sided endocarditis caused by Fusarium in immunocompromised patient: a case report. Mycoses 2011;54:460-2. 28. Tlamçaniz Z, Er-rami M. Fungal Opportunist Infection: Common and Emerging Fungi in Immunocompromised Patients. J Immunol Tech 2013;2:1-5. 29. Sifuentes-Osomio J, Corzo-León DE, Ponce-de-león LA. Epidemiology of invasive fungal infections in Latin America. Curr Fungal Infect 2012;6:23-34. 30. Sun H, Singh N. Mucormycosis: its contemporary face and malignant strategies. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:301-11. 31. Chakrabarti A, Chatterjee SS, Shivprakash MR. Overview of

Page 8: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

94

opportunistic Fungal Infections in India. Jpn J Med Mycol 2008;49:165-72. 32. Saha R, Rudra S. Pheomycotic cyst- a case report. J Indian Med Assoc 2005;103:555-6. 33. Rajendran C, Khaitan BK, Mittal R, Ranam M, Bharadwaj M, Datta KK. Pheohyphomycosis caused by Exophiala spinifera in India. Med Mycol 2003;41:437-41. 34. Puebla LEJ. Fungal infections in immunocompromised Patients, 1st ed., InTech Publishers, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. 35. Mori S, Cho I, Sugimoto M. A followup study of asymptomatic carriers of Pneumocystis jerovecii during immunosuppressive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2009;36:1600-5. 36. Cortez KJ, Roilides E, Quiroz-Telles F, Meletiades J, Antachopoulos C, Knudsen T, Buchanan W, Milanovich J, Sutton DA, Fothergill A, Rinaldi MG, Shea YR, Zaoutis T, Kottilil S, Walsh TJ. Infections caused by Scedosporium Spp. Clin Microbiol Rev 2008;21:157-97. 37. Carey J, Hofflich H, Amre R, Protic J, Perlman DC. Penicillium marneffei infection in an immunocompromised traveller. J Travel Med 2005;12:291-4. 38. Viscoli C, Machetti M, Gazzla P, De Maria A, Paola D, Van Lint MT, Gualandi F, Truini M, Basigalupo A. Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid of bone marrow transplant recipients with probable cerebral aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:1496-9. 39. Klont RR, Mennink-Kersten MA, Verweij PE. Utility of Aspergillus antigen detection in specimen other than serum specimens. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1467-74. 40. Viscoli C, Machetti M, Cappellano P, Bucci B, Bruzzi P, Van Lint MT, Basigalupo A. False-positive galactomannan platelia Aspergillus test results for patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:913-6. 41. Ellis M, Al-Ramadi B, Bersen R, Kristensen J, Alizadeh H, Hedstorm U. Prospective evaluation of mannan and anti-mannan antibodies for diagnosis of invasive Candida infections in patients with neutropenic fever. J Med Microbiol 2009;58:606-15. 42. Yeo SF, Wong B. Current status of non-culture methods for diagnosis of

invasive fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15:465-84. 43. Kurita H, Kamata T, Zhao C, Narikawa JN, Koite T, Kurashina K. Usefulness of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for Candida mannan antigen for detecting Candida in oral rinse solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:531-4. 44. Fujita S, Takamura T, Nagahara M, Hasimoto T. Evaluation of a newly developed down-flow immunoassay for detection of serum mannan antigens in patients with Candidemia. J Med Microbiol 2006;55:537-43. 45. Girouard G, Lachance C, Pelletier R. Observations of 1,3-beta-D-glucan detection as a diagnostic tool in endemic mycoses caused by Histoplasma or Blastomyces. J Med Microbiol 2007;56:1001-2. 46. Obayashi T, Yoshida M, Mori T, Goto H, Yosuoka A, Iwasaki H, Teshima H, Kohno S, Horiuchi A, Ito A. Plasma 1,3-beta-D-glucan measurement in diagnosis of invasive deep mycosis and fungal febrile episodes. Lancet 1995;345:17-20. 47. Senn L, Robinson JO, Schmidt S, Knaup M, Asahi N, Satomura S, Matsuura S, Duvoisin B, Bille J, Calandra T, Marchetti O. 1,3-Beta-D-glucan antigenaemia for early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:878-85. 48. Yamakami Y, Hashimoto A, Tokimatsu I, Nasu M. PCR detection of DNA specific for Aspergillus species in serum of patients with invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:2464-8. 49. Badiee P, Kordbacheh P, Alborzi A, Malekhoseini SA. Invasive fungal infection in renal transplant recipients demonstrated by panfungal polymerase chain reaction. Exp Clin Transplant 2007;5:624-9. 50. Badiee P, Alborzi A. Demonstration of Aspergillus species in bone marrow transplants. J Infect Dev Ctries 2010;4:511-6. 51. Borman AM, Linton CJ, Oliver D, Palmer MD, Szekely A, Johnson EM. Rapid molecular identification of pathogenic yeasts by Pyrosequencing analysis of 35 nucleotides of internal transcribed spacer 2. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:3648-53.

Page 9: An overview of Invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts

Dash et al.: Invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts

Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95

95

52. Gotway MB, Dawn SK, Caoili EM, Reddy GP, Araoz PA, Webb WR. The radiologic spectrum of pulmonary Aspergillus infections. J Comput Assist Tomor 2002;26:159-73. 53. Greene RE, Schlamm H, Oestmann J-W, Stark P, Durand C, Lortholary O, Wingard JR, Herbrecht R, Ribaud P, Patterson TF, Troke PF, Denning DW, Bennett JE, de Pauw BE, Rubin RH. Imaging Findings in Acute Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: Clinical significance of the Halo Sign. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:373-9. 54. Cornillet A, Camus C, Nimubona S, Gandemer V, Tattevin P, Belleguic C, Chevrier S, Meunier C, Lebert C, Aupée M, Caulet-Maugendre S, Faucheux M, Lelong B, Leray E, Guiguin C, Gangueux JP. Comparison of epidemiological, clinical and biological features in invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients: a 6-year survey. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:577-84. 55. Morrell M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. Delaying the empiric treatment of Candida blood stream infection until

positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3640-5. 56. Tankhiwale SR. Systemic Fungal Infections in Immunocompromised Patients. Vidarbha J Int Med 2014;16:29-34. 57. Chen SC, Slavin MA, Sorrell TC. Echinocandin antifungal drugs in fungal infections: a comparison. Drugs 2011;71:11-41. 58. Anaissie EJ, Stratton SL, Dignani MC, Lee C, Mahfouz TH, Rex JH, Summerbell RC, Walsh TJ. Cleaning shower facilities: a novel approach to reducing patient exposure to aerosolized Aspergillus species and other opportunistic moulds. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:E86-8. 59. Siwek GT, Dodgson KJ, de Magalhaes-Silverman M, Barlet LA, Kilborn SB, Hoth P, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA. Four cases of invasive zygomycosis in bone marrow transplant patients receiving voriconazole prophylaxis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:584-7.

.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14194/ijitd.1.2.6

How to cite this article: Dash M, Chayani N, Sarangi G. An overview of invasive fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts. Int J Infect Trop Dis 2014;1(2):87-95. Conflict of Interest: None declared

Submit your valuable manuscripts to Michael Joanna Publications for: • User-friendly online submission • Rigorous, constructive and unbiased peer-review • No space constraints or colour figure charges • Immediate publication on acceptance • Unlimited readership • Inclusion in AJOL, CAS, DOAJ, and Google Scholar Submit your manuscript at www.michaeljoanna.com/journals.php