an open-label phase iii study of arfolitixorin vs ... · an open-label phase iii study of...

1
An open-label Phase III study of arfolitixorin vs leucovorin in modified FOLFOX-6 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer Heinz-Josef Lenz, 1 Peter Gibbs, 2 Sebastian Stintzing, 3 Volker Heinemann, 4 Gerald W. Prager, 5 Peter Nygren, 6 Christos A. Papadimitriou, 7 Roger Tell, 8 Takayuki Yoshino, 9 Derek J. Jonker, 10 Aimery de Gramont, 11 Josep Tabernero 12 1 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2 Western Health, Melbourne, Australia; 3 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 4 Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany; 5 Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 6 Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 7 Aretaieion Hospital, Athens, Greece; 8 Isofol Medical AB, Gothenburg, Sweden; 9 National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; 10 Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 11 Franco-British Hospital, Levallois-Perret, France; 12 Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain BACKGROUND Current treatments and folate-based strategies First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is typically with cytotoxic chemotherapy, combined with biologics such as bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab 1 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), co-administered with the folate leucovorin, is an established cornerstone of mCRC treatment. 1 5-FU undergoes metabolic transformation to 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP), which potently inhibits the thymidylate synthase enzyme, in turn disrupting DNA synthesis and repair, and resulting in cell death in rapidly proliferating tumor cells (Figure 1) 2 For effective 5-FU inhibition of thymidylate synthase, folates are co-administered to form a stable ternary complex of FdUMP, [6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHF), and thymidylate synthase 3 All folates currently approved for clinical use in patients with mCRC are prodrugs that need to be metabolically activated to [6R]-MTHF, the active thymidylate synthase cofactor that potentiates the effect of 5-FU (Figure 2) 4 Mechanism of action of arfolitixorin Arfolitixorin consists of the active cofactor [6R]-MTHF and therefore does not require multi-step metabolic activation 4 Response to 5-FU/leucovorin may be impaired by low expression of folate-activating genes due to insufficient levels of cofactor and, consequently, weak inhibition of thymidylate synthase 5,6 Excess [6R]-MTHF, however, favors competition at the thymidylate synthase binding site for FdUMP over deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP), potentially permitting more extensive and prolonged enzyme inhibition following 5-FU treatment (Figure 1) 4 Arfolitixorin clinical data In the Phase I/II pharmacokinetics study ISO-CC-002, considerably higher intratumoral and intramucosal concentrations of [6R]-MTHF were achieved in patients receiving a single intravenous dose of arfolitixorin compared with levoleucovorin, at either of two equimolar dose levels, which is consistent with the potential for greater efficacy of arfolitixorin 7 Preliminary data from the Phase I/II study ISO-CC-005, which evaluated the efficacy of arfolitixorin/5-FU, alone or in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin, and with or without bevacizumab, reported early tumor shrinkage in 47% of first-line patients after 8 weeks. 8 After up to 32 weeks of follow-up, preliminary overall response rate (ORR) was achieved in 58% of patients. 8 The most frequently reported adverse events were typical chemotherapy side effects, including fatigue, nausea, neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting, and neuropathy 9 Phase III evaluation of arfolitixorin Evaluation of arfolitixorin in a larger randomized Phase III clinical setting is required to validate and extend these data STUDY COUNTRIES The AGENT study will take place across more than 100 sites in the following countries (Figure 4): Australia Austria Canada France Germany Greece Japan Spain Sweden USA STUDY DATES Key study milestones (Figure 5): First patient in: December 18, 2018 Interim analysis: Q3 2020 Final PFS data: Q3 2021 Final OS data: TBD STUDY RATIONALE It is hypothesized that the administration of arfolitixorin will result in higher intracellular concentrations of the active thymidylate synthase cofactor [6R]-MTHF in all patients compared with leucovorin administration, with less inter- and intra-individual variability In turn, this may translate to improved clinical efficacy in 5-FU treatment of mCRC STUDY DESIGN This is a randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, Phase III study AGENT (NCT03750786) to compare the efficacy of arfolitixorin relative to that of leucovorin in patients with mCRC treated with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab 10 Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the investigational arm (arfolitixorin + 5-FU + oxaliplatin [ARFOX] + bevacizumab) or the comparator arm (leucovorin + 5-FU + oxaliplatin [modified FOLFOX-6] + bevacizumab), and treated until occurrence of disease progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria (Figure 3) or unacceptable toxicity Key inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1. Contact: Professor Heinz-Josef Lenz, email: [email protected] Acknowledgements: This study is funded by Isofol Medical AB (publ). Medical writing assistance was provided by Shelley Morris of Syneos Health, UK, and funded by Isofol Medical AB (publ). Table 1. Key eligibility criteria PATIENTS Target recruitment includes randomization of 440 patients in 18 months and is currently ongoing (Figure 4). An adaptive study design, intended to ensure sufficient statistical power while minimizing patient numbers, includes the possibility to increase the sample size to 660 patients, as determined by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board during the interim analysis to be carried out after 330 patients have undergone their 16-week scan (Figure 3) STUDY ENDPOINTS The primary study endpoint will be ORR by blinded independent central review, defined as the best response from the start to the end of study treatment (Figure 3) Key secondary endpoints will include progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of tumor progression based on computerized tomography scans/magnetic resonance imaging or death, and duration of response (DoR), measured from when measurement criteria are first met for complete response/ partial response until progressive disease is first objectively documented Additional secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), quality of life, safety and tolerability, and patients undergoing curative metastasis resection REFERENCES 1. Van Cutsem E, et al. Ann Oncol 2016;27:1386–422; 2. Kline CLB, et al. Pharmaceuticals 2013;6:988–1038; 3. Gustavsson B, et al. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2015;14:1–10; 4. Danenberg PV, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016;106:118–31; 5. Odin E, et al. Mol Med 2015;21:597–604; 6. Gustavsson B, et al. Poster presentation at ASCO 2018 Congress. Poster no. 3550 (#43); 7. Wettergren Y, et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2015;75:37–47; 8. Isofol. Press release, May 2019. Available at: https://isofolmedical.com/ news-press/?detail=8DE31DA3DD13C740. Last accessed September 2019; 9. Carlsson G, et al. Poster presentation at ESMO 2018 Congress. Poster no. 569P; 10. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03750786. Last accessed September 2019. SUMMARY In contrast to folates currently approved to treat mCRC, arfolitixorin does not require metabolic activation and may produce higher and more consistent concentrations of [6R]-MTHF than the comparator leucovorin, which may in turn improve clinical efficacy This Phase III study will compare the efficacy of first-line arfolitixorin versus leucovorin in combination with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with mCRC The primary endpoint will be ORR and key secondary endpoints will include PFS and DoR A translational program will explore the relationship between expression levels of key genes involved in folate metabolism and transport in mCRC tumor biopsies, and treatment efficacy Interim data are anticipated in Q3 2020 (Figure 5) EXPLORATORY ANALYSES A translational program will determine folate metabolism- and transportation-related gene expression levels in all patients Fixed-formalin paraffin-embedded mCRC tumor sections derived from biopsies obtained prior to treatment initiation will be used for gene expression analysis via a validated technique to be conducted at a central accredited laboratory in Gothenburg, Sweden Levels of the following genes will be retrospectively analyzed: adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette C3 transporter, methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 2, proton-coupled folate transporter, serine hydroxymethyltransferase 1, peptidylprolyl-isomerase A, and beta-actin 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; CT, computerized tomography; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PS, performance status. KEY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Inclusion Adults ≥18 years of age Colorectal adenocarcinoma verified by biopsy Availability of biopsy material, from the primary tumor or metastasis, allowing for analysis of tumor gene expression Non-resectable mCRC planned for first-line therapy with leucovorin, 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab Evaluable disease (via CT scan or MRI) ECOG PS 0 or 1 Adequate hematologic function Adequate hepatic function Adequate renal function Exclusion Malignant tumors other than colorectal adenocarcinomas <6 months since last anti-cancer treatment Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency Clinically significant cardiovascular disease Central nervous system metastases Copies of this poster obtained through Quick Response (QR) Code are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without permission from ASCO® and the author of this poster. ASCO-GI Congress 2020. Poster no. TPS268 ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival. Non-resectable mCRC Eligible for 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab therapy ECOG PS 0 or 1 Stratification factors: Geographic region Primary tumor location Previous neo-adjuvant/ adjuvant treatment Randomization 1:1 ARFOX: arfolitixorin, 60 mg/m 2 IV bolus twice (total 120 mg/m 2 ); 5-FU, 400 mg/m 2 IV bolus, 2,400 mg/m 2 IV infusion; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m 2 IV infusion + bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg IV infusion Interim analysis: first ~330 patients Patients n=440 mFOLFOX-6: leucovorin, 400 mg/m 2 IV infusion; 5-FU, 400 mg/m 2 IV bolus, 2,400 mg/m 2 IV infusion; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m 2 IV infusion + bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg IV infusion Disease progression Disease progression Primary endpoint ORR Key secondary endpoints PFS DoR Additional secondary endpoints OS QoL Safety and tolerability Patients undergoing curative metastasis resection 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; ARFOX, arfolitixorin, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin; DoR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IV, intravenous; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; mFOLFOX-6, modified FOLFOX-6 (leucovorin, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin); ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PS, performance status; QoL, quality of life. Figure 3. Study design and planned analyses Final analysis (ORR and PFS) Figure 5. Key study milestones 5-FU metabolite competes to inhibit TS (and DNA synthesis), Arfolitixorin stabilizes 5-FU metabolite to inhibit TS (and block DNA synthesis) 5-FU FdUMP FdUMP TS-substrate (dUMP) 5-FU displaced due to MTHF shortage Thymidine shortage Normalized thymidine availability Normal DNA synthesis Tumor cell survival Arrested DNA synthesis Tumor cell death Tumor cell death ARFOLITIXORIN Persistent thymidine shortage Persistent DNA synthesis arrest 5-FU FdUMP TS-substrate (dUMP) TS-substrate (dUMP) TS TS TS 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; dUMP, deoxyuridine monophosphate; FdUMP, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate; MTHF, [6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate; TS, thymidylate synthase. Figure 4. Sites participating in the AGENT study Figure 2. Multi-step activation of folates Figure 1. Mechanism of action of arfolitixorin 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; THF, tetrahydrofolate. ISO01045_Isofol_AGENT_ENCORE_Clinical_Poster_for_ASCO_Dec_2019_1144x2363_Fa1b.indd 1 ISO01045_Isofol_AGENT_ENCORE_Clinical_Poster_for_ASCO_Dec_2019_1144x2363_Fa1b.indd 1 21/01/2020 16:27 21/01/2020 16:27

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An open-label Phase III study of arfolitixorin vs ... · An open-label Phase III study of arfolitixorin vs leucovorin in modified FOLFOX-6 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal

An open-label Phase III study of arfolitixorin vs leucovorin in modified FOLFOX-6 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer Heinz-Josef Lenz,1 Peter Gibbs,2 Sebastian Stintzing,3 Volker Heinemann,4 Gerald W. Prager,5 Peter Nygren,6 Christos A. Papadimitriou,7 Roger Tell,8 Takayuki Yoshino,9 Derek J. Jonker,10 Aimery de Gramont,11 Josep Tabernero12

1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Western Health, Melbourne, Australia; 3Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 4Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany; 5Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 6Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 7Aretaieion Hospital, Athens, Greece; 8Isofol Medical AB, Gothenburg, Sweden; 9National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; 10Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 11Franco-British Hospital, Levallois-Perret, France; 12Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain

BACKGROUNDCurrent treatments and folate-based strategies• First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is typically with cytotoxic chemotherapy, combined with biologics such as bevacizumab,

cetuximab, or panitumumab1 • 5-fluorouracil(5-FU),co-administeredwiththefolateleucovorin,isanestablishedcornerstoneofmCRCtreatment.15-FUundergoesmetabolictransformation

to5-fluorodeoxyuridinemonophosphate(FdUMP),whichpotentlyinhibitsthethymidylatesynthaseenzyme,inturndisruptingDNAsynthesisandrepair, and resulting in cell death in rapidly proliferating tumor cells (Figure 1)2

• Foreffective5-FUinhibitionofthymidylatesynthase,folatesareco-administeredtoformastableternarycomplexofFdUMP,[6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate(MTHF),andthymidylatesynthase3

• AllfolatescurrentlyapprovedforclinicaluseinpatientswithmCRCareprodrugsthatneedtobemetabolicallyactivatedto[6R]-MTHF,theactivethymidylatesynthasecofactorthatpotentiatestheeffectof5-FU(Figure 2)4

Mechanism of action of arfolitixorin• Arfolitixorinconsistsoftheactivecofactor[6R]-MTHFandthereforedoesnotrequiremulti-stepmetabolicactivation4 • Responseto5-FU/leucovorinmaybeimpairedbylowexpressionoffolate-activatinggenesduetoinsufficientlevelsofcofactorand,consequently,

weak inhibition of thymidylate synthase5,6

• Excess[6R]-MTHF,however,favorscompetitionatthethymidylatesynthasebindingsiteforFdUMPoverdeoxyuridinemonophosphate(dUMP), potentiallypermittingmoreextensiveandprolongedenzymeinhibitionfollowing5-FUtreatment(Figure 1)4

Arfolitixorin clinical data• InthePhaseI/IIpharmacokineticsstudyISO-CC-002,considerablyhigherintratumoralandintramucosalconcentrationsof[6R]-MTHFwereachievedin

patientsreceivingasingleintravenousdoseofarfolitixorincomparedwithlevoleucovorin,ateitheroftwoequimolardoselevels,whichisconsistentwith thepotentialforgreaterefficacyofarfolitixorin7

• PreliminarydatafromthePhaseI/IIstudyISO-CC-005,whichevaluatedtheefficacyofarfolitixorin/5-FU,aloneorincombinationwithirinotecan oroxaliplatin,andwithorwithoutbevacizumab,reportedearlytumorshrinkagein47%offirst-linepatientsafter8weeks.8Afterupto32weeks offollow-up,preliminaryoverallresponserate(ORR)wasachievedin58%ofpatients.8Themostfrequentlyreportedadverseeventsweretypicalchemotherapysideeffects,includingfatigue,nausea,neutropenia,diarrhea,vomiting,andneuropathy9

Phase III evaluation of arfolitixorin• EvaluationofarfolitixorininalargerrandomizedPhaseIIIclinicalsettingisrequiredtovalidateandextendthesedata

STUDY COUNTRIESTheAGENTstudywilltakeplace acrossmorethan100sitesin the following countries (Figure 4):

• Australia

• Austria

• Canada

• France

• Germany

• Greece

• Japan

• Spain

• Sweden

• USA

STUDY DATESKey study milestones (Figure 5):

• Firstpatientin:December18,2018

• Interimanalysis:Q32020

• FinalPFSdata:Q32021

• FinalOSdata:TBD

STUDY RATIONALE• It is hypothesized that the administration of arfolitixorin

will result in higher intracellular concentrations of the activethymidylatesynthasecofactor[6R]-MTHFinallpatients compared with leucovorin administration, with less inter- and intra-individual variability

• Inturn,thismaytranslatetoimprovedclinicalefficacyin5-FUtreatmentofmCRC

STUDY DESIGN• Thisisarandomized,multicenter,parallel-group,PhaseIIIstudyAGENT(NCT03750786)

tocomparetheefficacyofarfolitixorinrelativetothatofleucovorininpatientswithmCRCtreatedwith5-FU,oxaliplatin,andbevacizumab10

• Patientswillberandomizedina1:1ratiotoeithertheinvestigationalarm(arfolitixorin +5-FU+oxaliplatin[ARFOX]+bevacizumab)orthecomparatorarm(leucovorin+5-FU +oxaliplatin[modifiedFOLFOX-6]+bevacizumab),andtreateduntiloccurrenceofdiseaseprogressionbasedonResponseEvaluationCriteriainSolidTumors1.1criteria(Figure 3) or unacceptable toxicity

Key inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1.

Contact: Professor Heinz-Josef Lenz, email: [email protected] Acknowledgements: This study is funded by Isofol Medical AB (publ). Medical writing assistance was provided by Shelley Morris of Syneos Health, UK, and funded by Isofol Medical AB (publ).

Table 1. Key eligibility criteria

PATIENTS• Targetrecruitmentincludesrandomizationof

440patientsin18monthsandiscurrentlyongoing (Figure 4).Anadaptivestudydesign,intendedtoensuresufficientstatisticalpowerwhileminimizingpatient numbers, includes the possibility to increase thesamplesizeto660patients,asdeterminedby theDataandSafetyMonitoringBoardduringtheinterimanalysistobecarriedoutafter330patients haveundergonetheir16-weekscan(Figure 3)

STUDY ENDPOINTS• TheprimarystudyendpointwillbeORRbyblindedindependentcentralreview,

definedasthebestresponsefromthestarttotheendofstudytreatment(Figure 3) • Keysecondaryendpointswillincludeprogression-freesurvival(PFS),definedastime

fromrandomizationtofirstoccurrenceoftumorprogressionbasedoncomputerizedtomographyscans/magneticresonanceimagingordeath,anddurationofresponse (DoR),measuredfromwhenmeasurementcriteriaarefirstmetforcompleteresponse/partialresponseuntilprogressivediseaseisfirstobjectivelydocumented

• Additionalsecondaryendpointsincludeoverallsurvival(OS),qualityoflife,safety and tolerability, and patients undergoing curative metastasis resection

REFERENCES1.VanCutsemE,etal.AnnOncol2016;27:1386–422;2.KlineCLB,etal.Pharmaceuticals2013;6:988–1038;3.GustavssonB,etal.ClinColorectalCancer2015;14:1–10; 4.DanenbergPV,etal.CritRevOncolHematol2016;106:118–31;5.OdinE,etal.MolMed2015;21:597–604;6.GustavssonB,etal.PosterpresentationatASCO2018Congress.Posterno.3550(#43);7.WettergrenY,etal.CancerChemotherPharmacol2015;75:37–47;8.Isofol.Pressrelease,May2019.Availableat:https://isofolmedical.com/ news-press/?detail=8DE31DA3DD13C740.LastaccessedSeptember2019;9.CarlssonG,etal.PosterpresentationatESMO2018Congress.Posterno.569P; 10.ClinicalTrials.gov.Availableat:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03750786.LastaccessedSeptember2019.

SUMMARY• IncontrasttofolatescurrentlyapprovedtotreatmCRC,arfolitixorindoesnotrequiremetabolicactivationandmayproducehigherandmoreconsistent

concentrationsof[6R]-MTHFthanthecomparatorleucovorin,whichmayinturnimproveclinicalefficacy• ThisPhaseIIIstudywillcomparetheefficacyoffirst-linearfolitixorinversusleucovorinincombinationwith5-FU,oxaliplatin,andbevacizumabinpatients

with mCRC• TheprimaryendpointwillbeORRandkeysecondaryendpointswillincludePFSandDoR• AtranslationalprogramwillexploretherelationshipbetweenexpressionlevelsofkeygenesinvolvedinfolatemetabolismandtransportinmCRCtumor

biopsies,andtreatmentefficacy• InterimdataareanticipatedinQ32020(Figure 5)

EXPLORATORY ANALYSES• Atranslationalprogramwilldeterminefolatemetabolism-andtransportation-relatedgeneexpressionlevelsinallpatients• Fixed-formalinparaffin-embeddedmCRCtumorsectionsderivedfrombiopsiesobtainedpriortotreatmentinitiationwillbeusedforgeneexpression

analysisviaavalidatedtechniquetobeconductedatacentralaccreditedlaboratoryinGothenburg,Sweden• Levelsofthefollowinggeneswillberetrospectivelyanalyzed:adenosinetriphosphate(ATP)-bindingcassetteC3transporter,methylenetetrahydrofolate

dehydrogenase2,proton-coupledfolatetransporter,serinehydroxymethyltransferase1,peptidylprolyl-isomeraseA,andbeta-actin

5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; CT, computerized tomography; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PS, performance status.

KEY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion

• Adults≥18yearsofage• Colorectaladenocarcinomaverifiedbybiopsy • Availabilityofbiopsymaterial,fromtheprimary

tumor or metastasis, allowing for analysis of tumor gene expression

• Non-resectablemCRCplannedforfirst-linetherapywithleucovorin,5-FU,oxaliplatin,andbevacizumab

• Evaluabledisease(viaCTscanorMRI)• ECOGPS0or1• Adequatehematologicfunction • Adequatehepaticfunction • Adequaterenalfunction

Exclusion

• Malignanttumorsotherthancolorectal adenocarcinomas

• <6monthssincelastanti-cancertreatment• Knowndihydropyrimidinedehydrogenasedeficiency• Clinicallysignificantcardiovasculardisease• Central nervous system metastases

Copies of this poster obtained through Quick

Response (QR) Code are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without

permission from ASCO® and the author of this poster.

ASCO-GI Congress 2020. Poster no. TPS268

ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

• Non-resectable mCRC

• Eligible for 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab therapy

• ECOG PS 0 or 1 Stratification factors:• Geographic region• Primary tumor location• Previous neo-adjuvant/ adjuvant treatment

Randomization 1:1

ARFOX: arfolitixorin, 60 mg/m2 IV bolus twice (total 120 mg/m2); 5-FU, 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, 2,400 mg/m2 IV infusion;

oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 IV infusion + bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg IV infusion

Interim analysis: first ~330 patients

Patients

n=440

mFOLFOX-6: leucovorin, 400 mg/m2 IV infusion; 5-FU, 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, 2,400 mg/m2 IV infusion;

oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 IV infusion+ bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg IV infusion

Disease progression

Disease progression

Primary endpointORR

Key secondary endpointsPFSDoR

Additional secondary endpointsOS

QoLSafety and tolerability

Patients undergoing curative metastasis resection

5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; ARFOX, arfolitixorin, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin; DoR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IV, intravenous; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; mFOLFOX-6, modified FOLFOX-6 (leucovorin, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin); ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PS, performance status; QoL, quality of life.

Figure 3. Study design and planned analyses

Final analysis (ORR and PFS)

Figure 5. Key study milestones

5-FU metabolite competes to inhibit TS (and DNA synthesis), Arfolitixorin stabilizes 5-FU metabolite to inhibit TS (and block DNA synthesis)

5-FU FdUMP FdUMPTS-substrate

(dUMP)

5-FU displaced due to MTHF shortage

Thymidineshortage

Normalized thymidineavailability

NormalDNA synthesis

Tumor cell survival

Arrested DNA synthesis

Tumor cell death Tumor cell death

ARFOLITIXORIN

Persistent thymidine shortage

Persistent DNA synthesis arrest

5-FU FdUMPTS-substrate

(dUMP)TS-substrate

(dUMP)

TS TS TS

5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; dUMP, deoxyuridine monophosphate; FdUMP, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate; MTHF, [6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate; TS, thymidylate synthase.

Figure 4. Sites participating in the AGENT study

Figure 2. Multi-step activation of folates

Figure 1. Mechanism of action of arfolitixorin

5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; THF, tetrahydrofolate.

ISO01045_Isofol_AGENT_ENCORE_Clinical_Poster_for_ASCO_Dec_2019_1144x2363_Fa1b.indd 1ISO01045_Isofol_AGENT_ENCORE_Clinical_Poster_for_ASCO_Dec_2019_1144x2363_Fa1b.indd 1 21/01/2020 16:2721/01/2020 16:27