an lectrochemiluminescence- ased igand …/media/files/customer presentations/ecl... · ecl upon...

1
AN ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE-BASED LIGAND BINDING ASSAY FOR A G PROTEIN-COUPLED NEUROPEPTIDE RECEPTOR AN ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE-BASED LIGAND BINDING ASSAY FOR A G PROTEIN-COUPLED NEUROPEPTIDE RECEPTOR Jian Huang, Robert Bostwick and Jay Liu AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals AstraZeneca life inspiring ideas ABSTRACT A non-radioactive, homogeneous and high throughput ligand binding assay was developed for a G protein-coupled neuropeptide receptor using Meso-Scale Discovery’s electrochemiluminescence technology. The peptide ligand was labeled with Ru(bpy) 3 2+ at the N- terminus. The membrane receptors were immobilized on electrodes embedded in the assay plates. The binding of the ligand to the membrane receptor was detected via an electrochemically triggered light reaction. The Ru 2+ -labeled peptide bound to the receptor in a saturable manner with a Kd at ~0.8 nM. This binding could be competitively displaced by a number of unlabeled peptide analogs. The pharmacological properties of these peptides determined by this non-radioactive assay were similar to those obtained from SPA assay using iodinated ligand. The overall performance of this assay in the HTS environment was equivalent or superior to the radioactive SPA assay, with an assay window consistently >10, a Z' factor > 0.7, and a throughput of 100 plates/day. METHODS Membrane preparation HEK 293 cells expressing the GPCR of interest were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF) at 5 million cells/ml. Cells were homogenized with a Polytron and centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min at 4°C. Supernatants were centrifuged at 46,000g for 30 min. Pellets were resuspended in membrane buffer (50 mM Tris, 0.32 M sucrose, pH 7.0), aliquoted, and frozen in dry ice/ethanol and stored at -70°C until use. Binding assay using Meso Scale technology Membranes were diluted in assay buffer (25 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 1 mM CaCl 2 , pH 7.4 ) and dispensed in 1-2 μl (1 μg protein/well) in assay plates (MSD Multi-array™ High bind 384-well black, custom coated). The immobilization of the receptors to the bottom surfaces of the plates occurred when plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. 13 μl of a blocking agent (MSD 2000-40003) was added to minimize non specific binding. Compounds were transferred, and then Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -labeled peptide ligand was added to the assay plates. All of the above liquid handling procedures were performed using a 384- CybiWell. Plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Reading buffer containing tripropylamine was added using Multidrop and the ECL readings were immediately taken on Sector HTS reader. Total reaction volume was 25 μl/well. Final labeled ligand concentration was 0.5 nM. Assay to determine color-Quenching effects Since inhibition of binding is detected by a decrease in light intensity, color quenching by compound samples could result in false positive signals. To control for this effect, active samples were counter screened in an assay where biotinylated Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -IgG was bound to the surface of avidin-coated plates. Scintillation proximity assay (SPA) Membranes were thawed and diluted in assay buffer (same as above). The following 4 reactants were added to assay plates (Packard 384-well white OptiPlate): 5 μg/well membranes, 0.2 mg/well SPA beads (Amersham RPNQ0001,), 0.2 nM 125I-ligand (Perkin Elmer), and compounds at desired concentrations. Plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour followed by a 2 minute centrifugation at 2000 rpm. TopCount 384 was used for scintillation counting (1 minute/well). Total reaction volume = 40 μl/well. The assay was slightly modified for LeadSeeker readouts as follows: 1 μg/well membranes and 0.2 mg/well SPA beads (Amersham RPNQ0260). Plates were imaged for fluorescent intensity using LeadSeeker for 5 minutes. Total reaction volume = 20 μl/well. FLIPR assay Cell culture: An HEK 293 cell line expressing the GPCR receptor of interest was cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS, 1% penn Strep, 1% L- glutamin, 500 μg/ml G418, and 200 μg/ml hygromycin. Cells were plated (Poly-D-Lysine coated, BD Biocoat #356663) the day before experiment at the density of 25000 cells/well (20 μl/well) in the same medium. FLIPR assay: Cell medium was replaced by 20 μl/well of 1 X non- wash calcium indicator dye (Molecular Devices #R8033) in assay buffer (10% Hanks, 50 mM HEPES, and 0.1% BSA). After 1 hour incubation at 37°C, peptide agonists were applied to cell plates in the FLIPR and a series of images were taken subsequently for 2 minutes. The extent of GPCR activation was measured by the Max-Min response in the fluorescence signal. EFFECTS OF DMSO 0 1000 2000 3000 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2 6.4 12.8 % DMSO ECL intensity The assay could not tolerate DMSO concentrations > 0.2%. EFFECTS OF READING BUFFER Dissociation of Receptor-ligand after Addition of Reading Buffer 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 200 400 600 800 1000 total binding NSB Time (min) % remaining 0 100.0 2 95.1 4 82.6 6 70.2 8 61.4 10 47.0 15 43.1 25 24.6 40 11.5 55 6.5 Time (min) after addition of reading buffer ECL Upon addition of the TPA reading buffer, the labeled ligand rapidly disassociated from the receptor. Therefore, all readings were m ade between 1 and 2 minutes after the addition of reading buffer. TITRATION OF MEMBRANE PROTEINS 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 1 2 3 4 Protein/well ( mg) ECL intensity Total binding Non specific binding Specific binding Specific binding was linear for up to 1 mg of membrane protein. SATURATION BINDING Kd (nM) = 0.89 + 0.14, Bmax (pmol/mg protein) = 4.0 Saturation curve in Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -ligand binding 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Total Binding Non-specific Binding Saturation curve in Ru(bpy) 2+ -ligand binding 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Total Binding Non-specific Binding (in presence of 1 μM unlabeled peptide) Specific Binding nM [Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -ligand] ECL intensity COMPETITION BINDING Peptide A Peptide B Peptide C Peptide D Meso Scale 3.01 4.95 5.26 3.67 SPA 5.00 3.43 7.21 3.27 Ki values (nM) of unlabeled peptide ligands Competition binding of unlabeled peptide ligands in Meso Scale assay -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 0 200 400 600 800 1000 log [M] ligand ECL intensity Competition binding of unlabeled peptide ligands in Meso Scale assay -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 0 200 400 600 800 1000 peptide A peptide B peptide C peptide D peptide A peptide B peptide C peptide D log [M] ligand ECL intensity Competition binding of unlabeled peptide ligands in SPA -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 0 500 1000 1500 peptide A peptide B peptide C peptide D log [M] ligand cpm COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ASSAYS DELFIA FP MSD SPA - LeadSeeker SPA - TopCount Labeling molecule Europium Bodipy-TMR Ru(bpy) 3 2+ 125 I 125 I Effects of labeling* lost activity less active less active no effect no effect Assay Window N/A 1.4 > 10 5 > 10 Z' N/A < 0 0.7 0.5 0.7 Protein (mg/well) N/A 10 1 5 10 Throughput (reading time: min/plate) N/A 2 2 5 40 * Effects of labeling were measured using FLIPR assay for functi on (EC50 ) and 125I competition binding (IC50 ). Non Radioactive Radioactive SCREEN PERFORMANCE Typical daily results summary (70 plates) 0% activity control Avg. ECL = 1795.8 + 224.1 100% activity control Avg. ECL = 114.2 + 15.8 Z’ factor (x 100) Avg. Z’ = 0.73 Assay window Avg. = 12.4 Overall screen performance (summary of 1000 plates) 0% activity control Avg. ECL = 1818.4 + 152.6 100% activity control Avg. ECL = 119.9 + 12.6 Z’ factor (x 100) Avg. Z’ = 0.70 Assay window Avg. = 11.9 CONFIMED HITS WITH THEIR ACTIVITIES IN BOTH METHODS Compound Meso Scale % Activity % Light Quench SPA % Activity A 51.21 < 1 < 40 B 48.35 10 53.68 C 52.12 18.1 < 40 D 73.51 27.4 < 40 E 56.37 8.6 < 40 F 68.65 25.7 66.34 G 44.38 13.7 < 40 H 42.13 20.3 < 40 I 48.22 9.5 < 40 J 55.88 13.5 < 40 • Data shown above were averages of triplicates. • All hits showed minimal interference with ECL intensity. • Meso Scale method appeared to be more sensitive in identifying actives. RESULTS Using Meso Scale binding assay, screened a total of 308,613 compounds. Good assay performance with assay window > 10 and Z’ > 0.7. Throughput was 100 plates (384-well) per day, one person, one Sector HTS reader. 267 primary hits identified using the cutoff of 40% inhibition and statistically different from plate median. Hit rate = 0.087%. 10 actives confirmed in retest. Confirmation rate = 3.7%. CONCLUSION A robust receptor-ligand binding assay using Meso Scale technology has been established and used in high throughput screening for inhibitors of a G protein-coupled neuropeptide receptor. Among the methods evaluated, the non-radioactive Meso Scale technology is the most sensitive and highest throughput method for receptor-ligand binding. The assay is based on detection of electrochemiluminescence (ECL ). The peptide ligand was labeled with Ru(bpy) 3 2+ . Cell membranes were immobilized to the surface of assay plate s. Upon application of an electric current, the receptor-bound Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -ligand undergoes an oxidation-reduction cycle in the presence of a co- reactant tripropylamine (TPA) and emits light. Signal is only generated when the Ru(bpy) 3 2+ label is in close proximity to the electrode, thus discriminating the bound label from unbound and enabling a no wash, homogenous format. Inhibitors of binding are detected by a decrease in light intensity. MESO SCALE BINDING ASSAY PRINCIPLE The labeling with Ru(bpy) 3 2+ caused >10 fold decrease of affinity in 125 I- ligand competition binding using SPA The labeling with Ru(bpy) 3 2+ caused >10 fold decrease of affinity in functional (FLIPR) assay 125 I-ligand competition binding -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Unlabeled ligand IC50 = 3.4 nM Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled ligand IC50 = 40.3 nM log M NMU cpm Function of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ - ligand in FLIPR assay -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 Unlabeled ligand EC50 = 5.5 nM Ru(bpy) 3 2+ labeled ligand EC50 = 61.1 nM Log M NMU RFU EFFECT OF Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -LABELING ON THE BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE LIGAND *Ru(bpy) 3 2+ *Ru(bpy) 3 3+ *Ru(bpy) 3 2+ TPA TPA n + TPA n -H + e - e -

Upload: lamhanh

Post on 18-Jul-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AN LECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE- ASED IGAND …/media/files/customer presentations/ecl... · ECL Upon addition of the TPA reading buffer, the labeled ligand rapidly disassociated from

AN ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE-BASED LIGAND BINDING ASSAY FOR AG PROTEIN-COUPLED NEUROPEPTIDE RECEPTOR

AN ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE-BASED LIGAND BINDING ASSAY FOR AG PROTEIN-COUPLED NEUROPEPTIDE RECEPTOR

Jian Huang, Robert Bostwick and Jay LiuAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

AstraZenecalife inspiring ideas

ABSTRACT

A non-radioactive, homogeneous and high throughput ligand binding assay was developed for a G protein-coupled neuropeptide receptor using Meso-Scale Discovery’s electrochemiluminescence technology. The peptide ligand was labeled with Ru(bpy)3

2+ at the N-terminus. The membrane receptors were immobilized on electrodes embedded in the assay plates. The binding of the ligand to the membrane receptor was detected via an electrochemically triggered light reaction. The Ru2+-labeled peptide bound to the receptor in a saturable manner with a Kd at ~0.8 nM. This binding could be competitively displaced by a number of unlabeled peptide analogs. The pharmacological properties of these peptides determined by this non-radioactive assay were similar to those obtained from SPA assay using iodinated ligand. The overall performance of this assay in the HTS environment was equivalent or superior to the radioactive SPA assay, with an assay window consistently >10, a Z' factor > 0.7, and a throughput of 100 plates/day.

METHODS

Membrane preparationHEK 293 cells expressing the GPCR of interest were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF) at 5 million cells/ml. Cells were homogenized with a Polytron and centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min at 4°C. Supernatants were centrifuged at 46,000g for 30 min. Pellets were resuspended in membrane buffer (50 mM Tris, 0.32 M sucrose, pH 7.0), aliquoted, and frozen in dry ice/ethanol and stored at -70°C until use.

Binding assay using Meso Scale technologyMembranes were diluted in assay buffer (25 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl2 , 1 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4 ) and dispensed in 1-2 µl (1 µg protein/well) in assay plates (MSD Multi-array™ High bind 384-well black, custom coated). The immobilization of the receptors to the bottom surfaces of the plates occurred when plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. 13 µl of a blocking agent (MSD 2000-40003) was added to minimize non specific binding. Compounds were transferred, and then Ru(bpy)3

2+-labeled peptide ligand was added to the assay plates. All of the above liquid handling procedures were performed using a 384-CybiWell. Plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Reading buffer containing tripropylamine was added using Multidrop and the ECL readings were immediately taken on Sector HTS reader. Total reaction volume was 25 µl/well. Final labeled ligand concentration was 0.5 nM.

Assay to determine color-Quenching effectsSince inhibition of binding is detected by a decrease in light intensity, color quenching by compound samples could result in false positive signals. To control for this effect, active samples were counter screened in an assay where biotinylated Ru(bpy)3

2+-IgG was bound to the surface of avidin-coated plates.

Scintillation proximity assay (SPA)Membranes were thawed and diluted in assay buffer (same as above). The following 4 reactants were added to assay plates (Packard 384-well white OptiPlate): 5 µg/well membranes, 0.2 mg/well SPA beads (Amersham RPNQ0001,), 0.2 nM 125I-ligand (Perkin Elmer), and compounds at desired concentrations. Plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour followed by a 2 minute centrifugation at 2000 rpm. TopCount 384 was used for scintillation counting (1 minute/well). Total reaction volume = 40 µl/well. The assay was slightly modified for LeadSeeker readouts as follows: 1 µg/well membranes and 0.2 mg/well SPA beads (Amersham RPNQ0260). Plates were imaged for fluorescent intensity using LeadSeeker for 5 minutes. Total reaction volume = 20 µl/well.

FLIPR assayCell culture: An HEK 293 cell line expressing the GPCR receptor of interest was cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS, 1% penn Strep, 1% L-glutamin, 500 µg/ml G418, and 200 µg/ml hygromycin. Cells were plated (Poly-D-Lysine coated, BD Biocoat #356663) the day before experiment at the density of 25000 cells/well (20 µl/well) in the same medium.

FLIPR assay: Cell medium was replaced by 20 µl/well of 1 X non-wash calcium indicator dye (Molecular Devices #R8033) in assay buffer (10% Hanks, 50 mM HEPES, and 0.1% BSA). After 1 hour incubation at 37°C, peptide agonists were applied to cell plates in the FLIPR and a series of images were taken subsequently for 2 minutes. The extent of GPCR activation was measured by the Max-Min response in the fluorescence signal.

EFFECTS OF DMSO

0

1000

2000

3000

0 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2 6.4 12.8

% DMSO

ECL

inte

nsity

The assay could not tolerate DMSO concentrations > 0.2%.

EFFECTS OF READING BUFFERDissociation of Receptor-ligandafter Addition of Reading Buffer

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

200

400

600

800

1000

total bindingNSB

Time (min) % remaining0 100.02 95.14 82.66 70.28 61.410 47.015 43.125 24.640 11.555 6.5

Time (min)after addition of reading buffer

EC

L

Upon addition of the TPA reading buffer, the labeled ligand rapidly disassociated from the receptor. Therefore, all readings were m ade between 1 and 2 minutes after the addition of reading buffer.

TITRATION OF MEMBRANE PROTEINS

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 1 2 3 4

Protein/well (µg)

EC

L in

tens

ity

Total binding

Non specific binding

Specific binding

Specific binding was linear for up to 1 µg of membrane protein.

SATURATION BINDING

Kd (nM) = 0.89 + 0.14, Bmax (pmol/mg protein) = 4.0

Saturation curve inRu(bpy)3

2+-ligand binding

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Total BindingNon-specific Binding

Saturation curve inRu(bpy) 2+-ligand binding

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Total BindingNon-specific Binding(in presence of 1µM unlabeled peptide)Specific Binding

nM [Ru(bpy)32+-ligand]

EC

L in

tens

ity

COMPETITION BINDING

Peptide A Peptide B Peptide C Peptide D

Meso Scale 3.01 4.95 5.26 3.67

SPA 5.00 3.43 7.21 3.27

Ki values (nM) of unlabeled peptide ligands

Competition binding of unlabeledpeptide ligands in Meso Scale assay

-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -60

200

400

600

800

1000

log [M] ligand

EC

L in

tens

ity

Competition binding of unlabeledpeptide ligands in Meso Scale assay

-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -60

200

400

600

800

1000peptide Apeptide Bpeptide Cpeptide D

peptide Apeptide Bpeptide Cpeptide D

log [M] ligand

EC

L in

tens

ity

Competition binding of unlabeledpeptide ligands in SPA

-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -60

500

1000

1500

peptide Apeptide Bpeptide Cpeptide D

log [M] ligand

cpm

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ASSAYS

DELFIA FP MSD SPA - LeadSeeker SPA - TopCount

Labeling molecule Europium Bodipy-TMR Ru(bpy)32+ 125I 125I

Effects of labeling* lost activity less active less active no effect no effect

Assay Window N/A 1.4 > 10 5 > 10

Z' N/A < 0 0.7 0.5 0.7

Protein (µg/well) N/A 10 1 5 10Throughput

(reading time: min/plate)N/A 2 2 5 40

* Effects of labeling were measured using FLIPR assay for function (EC50 ) and 125I competition binding (IC50 ).

Non Radioactive Radioactive

SCREEN PERFORMANCETypical daily results summary (70 plates)

0% activity controlAvg. ECL = 1795.8 + 224.1

100% activity controlAvg. ECL = 114.2 + 15.8

Z’ factor (x 100)Avg. Z’ = 0.73

Assay windowAvg. = 12.4

Overall screen performance (summary of 1000 plates)

0% activity controlAvg. ECL = 1818.4 + 152.6

100% activity controlAvg. ECL = 119.9 + 12.6

Z’ factor (x 100)Avg. Z’ = 0.70

Assay windowAvg. = 11.9

CONFIMED HITS WITH THEIRACTIVITIES IN BOTH METHODS

CompoundMeso Scale% Activity

% Light Quench

SPA% Activity

A 51.21 < 1 < 40B 48.35 10 53.68C 52.12 18.1 < 40D 73.51 27.4 < 40E 56.37 8.6 < 40F 68.65 25.7 66.34G 44.38 13.7 < 40H 42.13 20.3 < 40I 48.22 9.5 < 40J 55.88 13.5 < 40

• Data shown above were averages of triplicates.• All hits showed minimal interference with ECL intensity.• Meso Scale method appeared to be more sensitive in identifying actives.

RESULTS

• Using Meso Scale binding assay, screened a total of 308,613 compounds.

• Good assay performance with assay window > 10 and Z’ > 0.7.

• Throughput was 100 plates (384-well) per day, one person, one Sector HTS reader.

• 267 primary hits identified using the cutoff of 40% inhibition and statistically different from plate median. Hit rate = 0.087%.

• 10 actives confirmed in retest. Confirmation rate = 3.7%.

CONCLUSION

• A robust receptor-ligand binding assay using Meso Scale technology has been established and used in high throughput screening for inhibitors of a G protein-coupled neuropeptide receptor. • Among the methods evaluated, the non-radioactive Meso Scale technology is the most sensitive and highest throughput method for receptor-ligand binding.

The assay is based on detection of electrochemiluminescence (ECL). The peptide ligand was labeled with Ru(bpy)3

2+. Cell membranes were immobilized to the surface of assay plates. Upon application of an electric current, the receptor-bound Ru(bpy)3

2+-ligand undergoes an oxidation-reduction cycle in the presence of a co-reactant tripropylamine (TPA) and emits light. Signal is only generated when the Ru(bpy)3

2+ label is in close proximity to the electrode, thus discriminating the bound label from unbound and enabling a no wash, homogenous format. Inhibitors of binding are detected by a decrease in light intensity.

MESO SCALE BINDING ASSAY PRINCIPLE

• The labeling with Ru(bpy)3

2+ caused >10 fold decrease of affinity in 125I-ligand competition binding using SPA

• The labeling with Ru(bpy)3

2+ caused >10 fold decrease of affinity in functional (FLIPR) assay

125I-ligand competition binding

-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -40

500

1000

1500

2000

Unlabeled ligandIC50 = 3.4 nM

Ru(bpy) 32+ labeled ligand

IC50 = 40.3 nM

log M NMU

cpm

Function of Ru(bpy)32+ - ligand

in FLIPR assay

-12 -10 -8 -6 -40

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

Unlabeled ligandEC50 = 5.5 nM

Ru(bpy)32+ labeled ligand

EC50 = 61.1 nM

Log M NMU

RFU

EFFECT OF Ru(bpy)32+ -LABELING ON THE

BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE LIGAND

*Ru(bpy)32+

*Ru(bpy)33+*Ru(bpy)3

2+

TPA TPAn +

TPAn

-H+

e- e-