an example of transformer overload and short

5
An Example Of Transformer Overload and Short-Circuit Protection Posted JAN 21 2015 by EDVARD in PROTECTION , TRANS FO RM ERS wit 5 COMMENTS An Example Of Transformer Overload and Short-Circuit Protection (photo credit: ABB; MarianoBerrogain) NEC Article 450 // Transformers Vaults Transformer protection consists of bothoverload protection andshort-circuit protection. Overload protection is usually accomplished via proper selection of the secondary overcurrent protective device . NEC Article 450 gives speci c primary and secondary overcurrent device ratings that may be exceeded. These vary depending upon the accessibility of the transformer to unquali e persons and the impedance of the transformer. The smallest protective device that allows rated full-load current of the transformer gives the best practical overcurrent protecti Increasing the secondary overcurrent device size beyond this may be necessary for short- overloads or for coordination with downstream devices, but in any case the requirements ofNEC Article 450 must be met!

Upload: nuno-henriques

Post on 07-Oct-2015

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

s

TRANSCRIPT

An Example Of Transformer Overload and Short-Circuit ProtectionPostedJAN 21 2015byEDVARDinPROTECTION,TRANSFORMERSwith5 COMMENTS

An Example Of Transformer Overload and Short-Circuit Protection (photo credit: ABB; Mariano Berrogain)NEC Article 450 // Transformers VaultsTransformer protection consists of bothoverload protectionandshort-circuit protection. Overload protection is usually accomplished via proper selection of thesecondary overcurrent protective device.NEC Article 450gives specific primary and secondary overcurrent device ratings that may not be exceeded. These vary depending upon the accessibility of the transformer to unqualified persons and the impedance of the transformer. The smallest protective device that allows the rated full-load current of the transformer gives the best practical overcurrent protection.Increasing the secondary overcurrent device size beyond this may be necessary for short-term overloads or for coordination with downstream devices, but in any case the requirements ofNEC Article 450 must be met!Short-circuit protection involves comparison of the transformer damage curve perIEEE Std. C57.109-1993with the primary overcurrent device time-current characteristic. In general, the damage curve must be to the right and above the primary overcurrent device characteristic.Another constraint on the primary overcurrent device is that it must be capable ofwithstanding the inrush of the transformerwithout tripping (and without damage for currentlimiting fuses).

Example //An example time-current characteristic showing protection for a 1000 kVA 13.2 kV Delta:480 Y/277 V, 5.75%Z dry-type transformer is shown in Figure 1. The transformer is protected with a 65E current-limiting primary fuses and a 1200 A electronic-trip secondary circuit breaker. As can be seen from the figure, the fuses do withstand the inrush without damage since the inrush point is to the left and below the fuse minimum melt curve.

Figure 1 Example protection for a 1000 kVA, 13.2 kV Delta: 480 Y/277V, 5.75%Z dry-type transformer

The transformer is protected from short-circuits by the primary fuses.The secondary circuit breaker provides overload protection at the full-load current of the transformer. Note that the primary fuse and secondary circuit-breaker characteristics overlap for high fault currents; this is unavoidable and is considered acceptable. Note also that the fuse curve and the transformer damage curve overlap; this is unavoidable but these should overlap at the lowest current possible.For currentsbelow the fuse/transformer damage curveoverlap the secondary circuit breaker must protect the transformer.The lower the point of overlap, the more likely the fault is an external fault on the load side of the secondary circuit breaker and therefore greater chance the secondary circuit breaker will effectively protect the transformer for faults in this region.Also note that the transformer damage characteristic is shown twice. Because transformer is a delta-wye transformer, a ground-fault on the secondary side of the transformer will result in only 57.7% of the maximum three-phase primary fault current while one secondary winding experiences the full fault current.This is illustrated in Figure 2, as well as the corollary for delta-delta transformers.

Figure 2 Fault-current flow for delta-wye transformer L-N faults and delta-delta transformer L-L faults

The damage characteristic has therefore been shifted to57.7% of its published valueto account for secondary line-to-ground faults. Also, the shifted curve has another, more conservative curve shown; this is the frequent-fault curve and is applicable only to the secondary overcurrent device since faults between the transformer secondary and the secondary overcurrent protective device should not be frequent.Additional devices, such asthermal overload alarms/relaysandsudden-pressure relays, are also available for protection of transformers. These are typically specified with the transformer itself and can provide very good protection. However, even if these devices are installed the primary and secondary overcurrent devices must be coordinated with the transformer as described above.Differential protection for transformersis very effective for transformer internal faults.If differential protection is supplied it is the primary protection for internal faults and will operate before the primary overcurrent device. The primary overcurrent device serves as a backup protective device for internal faults in this case.Reference:System Protection Bill Brown, P.E., Square D Engineering Services