an economic case for freeway optimization...economic case for freeway management april 11, 2014...
TRANSCRIPT
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
An Economic Case for Freeway Optimizationor, “The Artist Formerly Known as Congestion Pricing”
Mike Brown, PE, AICPPresident, Metro Analytics
Chandler Duncan, AICPEDR Group
Win-Win for
Virtually Everyone
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Context
• Ask any DOT, “Are you optimizing your freeway?”
Of course, as best as we can.
Truth is, America has no truly “optimized freeways”
• Optimizing freeways may be the single most importantthing we could do to help freeways fit into a sustainablefuture and contribute to increased usage of other modes
• This may well be the highest Benefit / Cost ratioopportunity – swamping all other project types.
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Congestion Stinks!• But what else can we do besides build?
Billions in savings, productivity, new jobsavailable for any city that can reducefreeway congestion.
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Congestion Stinks!
• Build our way out?
Been there, Done that, Doesn’t work
It’s a cancer that returns with a vengeance
• Decide our way out? – Easy
Technically Easy
Politically Impossible!!
Eventually Inevitable?
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Technically Easy?
• Freeway congestion is easy to eliminate.
Approaching failure? Slow the Flow!
• How?
Congestion Pricing
Extended Ramp Metering
Decent Alternatives to Create Elasticity
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Politically Impossible!
Because people think…
• Pricing will clobber side-streets as people avoid fees!
• Congestion Pricing is a tax, or even double-tax!
TEA Party = “Taxed Enough Already”
• Right or wrong, free freeways are an Institution
Like baseball and apple pie!
Could become politically inevitable if we educate about the positives
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Key to Inevitability –Convince People They Are Better Off
• Free freeways ensure doom on all streets
• Pricing makes all streets better off
Really? Yes, Really
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Scenario 1:Everyday, USA
*Based in Salt Lake City, Utah, but generally applicable almost anywhere
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Green: Maximum 1-hr Capacities
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Blue: 90% Loads, just before peak hour
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Red: Freeway Sustains Max for 15 Minutes
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Black: Collapses toStop-n-Go; 70%throughput fornext 2-hours
Yellow: Remaining30% try to go
somewhere else
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Their diversioncauses otherroads to fail
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Now 2nd Freewaycollapses. All
streets becomeparking lots
Lose-Losefor everyone
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Scenario 2:Tollway, USA…
*Based in Salt Lake City, Utah, but generally applicable almost anywhere
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Tolling vs Pricing
• Tolling is a tax: aimed at maximum revenue
High Prices – All day, for Construction Payoff + Profit
• Pricing is management: aimed at max throughput & speed
Low Prices – Free most of the time, and at 5pm justenough to avoid collapse.
• Tolled roads have great speeds
But what about side streets?
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
High prices could shifttoo much to arterials.
Win-Lose:Win for Many,
Lose for Too Many
Tolling is better than status quo, and a good wayto generate funds if that is the objective.
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Scenario 3, Freeway Optimization:Everyday, USA…
Someday
*Based in Salt Lake City, Utah, but generally applicable almost anywhere
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
90% Loads, just before peak hour
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Pink: Computer-managed access allows freeways to“hover” at 95%, just short of “red” collapse
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Some people move toarterials to avoid fees.
Others use transit, adjust schedules,or eventually move closer to work.
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
But even with many shiftingto side streets, side streetsare NOT worse off.
Why?
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Yes, 5% leave.But 20% come back, because they fit!Last 5% is intentional safety cushion.
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
And where every road crawls today…
Every road moves tomorrow, sovirtually everyone is better off!
Win – Win!
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
Max PotentialThroughput
Peak PeriodSad Reality
ManagedBliss
100%
77%
95%
Screenline
PeakVolumes
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I-215 Redwood I-15 State 700 E
100%
28%
86%
Screenline
WeightedSpeeds
Peak PeriodSad Reality
ManagedBliss
Max PotentialThroughput
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Speed vs.Flow
Pricing moves everyone out of the “Road Rage” zone, intoa happier place, just at the verge of “white-knuckle”
Happy Zone
WhiteKnuckle
Road RageZone
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
I need morepower.
Three of Eightcylinders aren’t
working.
Government Engineers
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
So my V-8 actslike a V-5… If weinstall a V-12 willit act like a V-8?
We’ll have todouble-deck two
V-6’s, but…Let’s do it!
Government Engineers
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Highlights• Pricing is like a tune-up that creates lots of “new” capacity.
Equivalent to many new freeway lanes
Guarantees 60+ speeds, 24-7
Costs very little to implement
Makes parallel arterial speeds slightly faster too.
Extremely high Benefit-Cost ratio
Generates cash for mitigation projects.
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Highlights• If distance based (frequent towers), it does all of this
without much if any new VMT or sprawl.
Improves air quality.
More sustainable.
• All of that’s got to be worth something, right?
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Words Matter
Meet Mr.Congestion Pricing
Meet Mr. FreewayOptimization
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
The Economics ofFreeway Optimization
Chandler DuncanEconomic Development Research Group
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Economic Development Research Group• Have Studied Tolls, PPP’s and congestion pricing economic effects
on States and MPO’s
• Active in TRB Congestion Pricing Research
• National Expertise in Transportation cost-benefit analysis, economicimpact analysis and fiscal impact analysis
• No “Universal” Position on Congestion Pricing
• Interested in Developing Best Practices for Implementation
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Removes regulatory barriers andcreates programs for market-basedsolutions
Greater state autonomy in establishing toll facilitiesfor new lanes or facilities
Congestion pricing strategies: priced express lanes,HOV to HOT lanes
Value Pricing Pilot Program: for pricing of existingtoll-free facilities without substantial reconstruction
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Three E’s to Remember
• 1. ECONOMICS
Consider economic effects of tolls, not justperformance effects
• 2. EFFICIENCY
Look at the whole networks (not just the tolledfacility)
• 3. EQUITY
It matters who pays, and how you spend theproceeds
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 201437
Economic Break-Even Point
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Toll Revenue Collected (InMillions)
Societal Benefit of TrafficImpact
Implementation Cost(Including ImprovementCosts Imposed onSecondary Systems)
Total Societal Benefit (ofToll + Secondary RoadwayImprovemetns)
Source: EDR Group/TREDIS – (with Data from Portland Metro Model)
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Base Case: 2040“Do Nothing”
• All Wasatch Front freeways =unmanaged access
• Most segments failing in peak hours
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
2040 “Blind Tolls”
• What if all freeways were converted to tollways?
Primary Objective: Maximize Revenue
Indirect Benefits: Gets freeways moving again
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
2040 Freeway Optimization
• All freeways remain free most of the time.
• Modest fee applied only at eminent failure.
Primary Objective: Maximize Throughput
Indirect Benefits: Income stream for mitigation
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
TREDISTransportation Economic Development Impact System
• Can be integratedwith travel models
• Compare projectideas against base case
• Monetary value, GDP and jobs created by…
Reduced VMT
Reduced Travel Times
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Economic Benefits and ImpactsBenefits and Positive Impacts “Blind Tolls” Congestion
Pricing
30-Year Societal Benefit $4 Billion $54 Billion
30-Year Gross Regional Product chg. $1.5 Billion+/- $1.7 Billion
$12 Billion+/- $760 Million
New Jobs, Year 30 2,100+/- 1000
17,000+/- 500
Potential Transportation EffectsPotential Toll Levy Effects
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Look Before You Leap! “Blind Tolls” (as taxes) can actually make the economy smaller
Some states require economic impact analysis
Economic Tolling Evaluation Can Help:
• Learn from the experiences of peers (case studies)
• Educate the Public and Stakeholders
• Assess what the local market will bear
• Identify economic break-even toll and revenue points
• Assess Land Use and Community Development Effects
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
“Pricing” Vs. Taxation –What’s a Network Worth?
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
Competitive Advantage
Frustrated businesses
One more reason to choose Utah!
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
We want less use of cars, and more use oftransit. But price structure is opposite.
Cars
Transi
t
The way it is…The way it should be, to get what we want…
Pay
for
Cheap
Economic Case for Freeway Management April 11, 2014
"Today's problems cannot be solved by thelevel of thinking that created them."
– Albert Einstein
Solving Future MobilityProblems Requires
“Non-Linear”Thinking
Outside the Box
!!!!!!