an analysis of th result of national achievement 2009 2010 part2

THE NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST OF GRADE 6 IN RELATION

TO BOES TEACHERS’ PERFORMANCE

(A Barrio Obrero Elementary School Thesis for SY 2009-2010)

MS. DANCEL A. UDQUIMBOES RESEARCH

Background of the Study

• Statistics showed big decrement from an MPS 56.38 of SY 2006-2007 to an MPS of 47.41 of SY 2007-2008. Thus it slipped from rank 56 of SY 2006-2007 to rank 66 of SY 2007-2008. It gained a slight improvement on the following year with an MPS of 51.66 which made it to rank 56 again out of 71 schools from Division of City School Manila which took the said standardized test.

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-200942

46

50

54

5856.38R. 56

47.41R.66

51.66R. 56

Chart Title

SCOPE AND DELIMITATION

**The study used a PURPOSIVE SAMPLING TECHNIQUE for it targeted the 21 Grade Six of Teachers of BOES handling the subjects related to NAT specifically MATH, FILIPINO, ENGLISH, HEKASI, SCIENCE. A questionnaire was made to get the demographic profile and performance ratings. However, their answers were still validated by BOES-EMIS Chairman for accuracy, consistency and reliability of the result of the study.

**This study aimed to test the degree of relationship of the Teachers’ Performance ratings and the Students’ performance in the National Achievement test from SY 2006-2007 up to SY 2008-2009.

**Thus, results of the said school for the said standardized tests were also rigidly analyzed by the researchers.

CONCEPTUAL PARADIGM

HYPOTHESIS: THERE IS

STRONG SIGNIFICANT

RELATIONSHIP TO ATTAIN SUCCESS

STUDENTS’ NAT

RESULTS

TEACHERS’ PERFORMANCE

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

• This aimed to provide empirical data that will somehow serve as guide to the principal, Master Teachers, and teachers in their respective courses of actions on the matters regarding the NAT.

• This study was done for the purpose of motivating the teachers BOES Administrators (principal, MTs) to make innovation regarding their review schemes for the coming National Achievement Test. Since, the entire Chapter II of this study have thoroughly explained that there is a strong relationship between the 2 variables of this study based on the LOCAL and FOREIGN LITERATURE GATHERED.

TEACHERS’ PERFORMANCE

ENGLISH FILIPINO MATH SCI-ENCE

HEKASI MEAN

2006-2007

9.17 8.92 9.49 8.67 8.7 8.99

2007-2008

9.43 9.16 9.25 9.14 9.08 9.21

2008-2009

9.2 9.34 9.34 8.98 9.23 9.22

8.3

8.5

8.7

8.9

9.1

9.3

9.5

Descriptive Rating:

9.50-10.00- OUTSTANDING

7.79-9.49-VERY SATISFACTORY

6.0-7.69-Satisfactory

3.69-5.99-Unsatisfactory

3.59-below-Poor

The graph given that all teacher-respondents got a performance rating ranging from 7.79-9.49 categorized as VERY SATISFACTORY for the last three years. With an increasing mean at teachers’ performance for the last three school years.

STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009

ENGLISH 48.63 40.87 50.04

FILIPINO 71.81 71.71 70.07

MATH 52.82 38.26 45.44

SCIENCE 41.51 36.89 40.68

HEKASI 67.05 49.32 52.06

MEAN 56.38 47.41 51.66

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

Descriptive Equivalent of Scores

MASTERED (M)- 100-96%

CLOSELY APPROXIMATING MASTERY (CAM)- 86-95%

MOVING TOWARDS MASTERY (MTM)-85-66%

AVERAGE MASTERY

(AM)- 65-36%

LOW MASTERY (LM)-34-15%

VERY LOW MASTERY

(VLM)-14-5%

ABSOLUTELY NO MASTERY-(ANM)-4-0%

Students had a decreasing mean from the first 2 school

year and a slight increment at the last year.

Pearson Correlation Coefficient is used to test the relationship between the two

variables of this study.

SY XMPS in NAT

XMPS TEACHERS’

XY X2 Y2

2006-2007

56.38 8.99 506.86 3178.7044

80.92

2007-2008

47.41 9.21 435.65 2247.7081

84.82

2008-2009

51.66 9.22 476.31 2668.7556

85.01

155.45 27.42 1419.81 8095.17 250.65

O.0-0.20-neglible correlation

0.21-0.40- slight correlation0.40-0.70-

moderate correlation0.71-0.90-high correlation

0.91-.99-Very high Correlation

1.00-onwards-perfect correlation

The computed value is 0.49 which is categorized as MODERATE CORRELATION. Thus, there is a SLIGHT CORRELATION only between these two variables. It did not support the hypothesis that there is a perfect correlation between which is the acceptable norm in this case.

SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATON

• Based from the data, Majority of the teachers are rated VERY SATISFACTORY and a handful were rated OUTSTANDING yearly based on the Performance Appraisal System Tool used. However, teachers’ ratings did not assure their students would perform very satisfactorily or outstanding in the said test because big percentages of these students were classified with average mastery followed by students with low mastery. None of the graduates for the last three school years mastered the skills tested. The mean percentage of the school did not gain much improvement. The students did not depict the same performance as their teachers did.

• However, the researcher/s saw one instrument used on this study which greatly affected the relationship of these variables. The PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM TOOL used is founded by self-rating. The objectivity, validity and accuracy of the process are questionable. It led to subjectivity and over-rating of a teacher’s performance.

The researcher/s recommends that a further study regarding

the improvement of the assessment tool should be done.• Their should a be careful, objective-based and

performance-based planning of teachers to be placed in each grade level more importantly in grades 3 and 6.

• Encourage teachers to focus in instructional and content/skill assessment of the subject they are teaching. And upgrade their skills on subjects concerned.

• To ensure greater student performance, the school should create a committee composed of MTs and Subject Coordinators on the NAT -related subjects who will yearly conduct an assessment of the skills tested. They will yearly produce review materials based from their findings to have a more effective review scheme in the future.

The school need to implement coherent, meaningful professional development programs which enhance teacher-effectiveness. Conduct a follow-up study in additional to investigate further the relationship between these 2 variables.

• The researcher needs to conduct a thesis regarding the least mastered skills from this standardized tests to ensure valid review schemes to be done next NAT.

• However, the recommendations based on the result of this study were offered by the researcher/s in the hope that changes may happen which will support the teachers and administrators as they work in limited resources in the hardest and most stressful profession there is---the improvement of student achievement in public school education.

MS. DANCEL A. UDQUIM BOES RESEARCH CHAIR

An Analysis of thE Result of National Achievement Test

SY 2009-2010

FILIPINO COMPETENCIES TESTED

1. Nagagamit sa pangungusap ang panghalip, pang-uri, pandiwa, pang-abay, pangatnig at ang pang-angkop.

2. Nagagamit ang pangungusap ayon sa gamit

3. Natutukoy ang kahulugan ng salita (kasingkahulugan,kasalungat)

4. Natutukoy ang pangunahing kaisipan at mahahalagang detalye sa binasa

5. Nagagamit ang panipi at kuwit sa tuwirang sinabi ng tauhan

6. Nagagamit sa pangungusap ang pang-abay at pang-ugnay

7. Nagagamit ang uri ng panlapi sa pabuo ng pandiwa

8. Natutukoy ang paksang diwa, sanhi at bunga sa kwento o akda

9. Nailalarawan ang katangian ng tauhan batay sa kilos at pananalita

10. Napagsusunod-sunod ang mga pangyayari sa kwento

11. Nakakapagbigay ng palagay sa maaring kalabasan ng mga pangyayari batay sa ikinikilos ng tauhan

12. Nasusuri ang mga detalye na napaliwanag sa pangunahing diwa

13. Nagagamit ang mga grapikong pantulong sa pag-unawa ng teksto

14. Napupunan nang wastong pormularyong pampaaralan

15. Naisasalin nang pasulat ang mga impormasyong ipinahihiwatig ng mga grapikong pantulong.

COMPARATIVE RESULT

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

MASTERY LEVEL OF BOESIANS IN FILIPINO 6



CLOSELY APPROXIMATING

MASTERY (CAM)-86-95%

MOVING TOWARDS MASTERY (MTM)-66-

85%

AVERAGE MASTERY

(AM)- 36-65%

LOW MASTERY (LM)-15-34

VERY LOW MASTERY

(VLM)-5-14%


271 of the examinees were moving towards mastery on Filipino 6

M CAM MTM AM LM VLM ANM

EX-AMI-NEES

1 69 271 132 4 0 0

% 0.2096436058700

22

14.465408805031

5

56.813417190775

7

27.672955974842

9

0.8385744234800

87

0 0

25

75

125

175

225

275

MATHEMATICSCOMPETENCIES TESTED

• Computation of rational numbers

• Solve word problems on rational numbers

• Identify congruent polygons

• Solve problems on measurements

• Interpret graphs• Interpret

measurement data

NAT RESULT

-5

5

15

25

35

45

Mastery Level of BOESIANS in MATH 6



CLOSELY APPROXIMATING MASTERY (CAM)-86-95%


AVERAGE MASTERY

(AM)- 36-65%


VERY LOW MASTERY

(VLM)-5-14%


27 of the examinees were WITH AVERAGE

MASTERY Followed by students with low

mastery on Math 6.


EXAM-INEES

0 1 33 274 157 12 0

% 0 0.209643605870022

6.91823899371071

57.4423480083859

32.9140461215931

2.51572327044025

0

25

75

125

175

225

275

English Competencies Tested NAT RESULT

Use of verbs in the simple present tense Use adverbs of manner Use reflexive pronouns and possessive

pronouns Identify simple sentences Note details in the selection Predict outcomes based on the

selection Infer the general mood of the selection Sequence events in the selection Use verbs that agree with indefinite

pronouns Use degrees of comparisons of adverbs Use degrees of comparison of irregular

adjectives Use adjectives in a series Use prepositions/ prepositional phrase Identify the main idea/ theme of

selection Determine the cause –effect

relationship based on a given selection Identify the supporting details to justify

conclusion Distinguish fact from opinion

-5

5

15

25

35

45

55

MASTery LEVEL of BOESIANS in ENGLISH



CLOSELY APPROXIMATING MASTERY (CAM)-86-95%


AVERAGE MASTERY

(AM)- 36-65%


VERY LOW MASTERY

(VLM)-5-14%


271 of the examinees were WITH AVERAGE MASTERY Followed by students who

are moving towards mastery on Filipino 6.


EX-AMI-NEES

0 3 116 269 88 1 0

% 0 0.62893081761006

7

24.3186582809224

56.3941299790356

18.4486373165617

0.20964360587002

2

0

25

75

125

175

225

275

Science 6Competencies tested NAT RESULT Identify the major parts of a

body system and their functions Explain how a body system

works Classify vertebrates in 5 sub-

classes Describe the characteristics of

living things for survival Describe the characteristics of

different kinds of plants Differentiate physical from

chemical change Describe distinct characteristics

of planets Present the feeding

interrelationships among living things

Illustrate the interdependence of plants, animals for gasses

2.5

7.5

12.5

17.5

22.5

27.5

32.5

37.5

42.5

47.5

Mastery level of BOESIANS in SCIENCEDescriptive Equivalent

of Scores





85%

AVERAGE MASTERY

(AM)- 36-65%


VERY LOW MASTERY

(VLM)-5-14%


27 of the examinees were WITH AVERAGE

MASTERY Followed by students with low

mastery on Science 6.


EXAMI-NEES

0 5 69 290 111 2 0

% 0 1.04821802935011

14.4654088050315

60.7966457023061

23.2704402515722

0.41928721174004

3

0

25

75

125

175

225

275

HEKASI Competencies tested NAT RESULT

Naipagmamalaki ang katangiang pisikal ng Pilipinas

Napapahalagahan ang uti ng pamumuhay ng mga unang Pilipino

Nabibigyang halaga ang kalagayan ng pamumuhay ng Pilipino noong Ikatlong Republika

Naipagkakapurin ang mga mamamayang Pilipino

Napapahalagahanang mga matatalinong paggamit at pangangalaga ng likas na yaman

Napapahalagahan ang bahaging ginagampanan ng pamahalaan at mamamayan sa kaabutihan ng bansa

Napapahalagahan ang pananatili ng kalayaan ng bansa

Nakikilala ang palatandaan ng kaunlaran ng bansa

5

15

25

35

45

55

Mastery Level of BOESIANS in HEKASIDescriptive

Equivalent of Scores





85%

AVERAGE MASTERY

(AM)- 36-65%


VERY LOW MASTERY

(VLM)-5-14%


27 of the examinees were WITH AVERAGE MASTERY Followed

by students with low mastery on Science 6.

M CAM MTM

AM LM VLM ANM

EX-AM-IN-EES

0 22 135 258 61 1 0

% 0 4.6121593291404

4

28.301886792452

9

54.088050314465

4

12.788259958071

3

0.209643605870022

0

25

75

125

175

225

275

Comparative Analysis of National Achievement Test SY 2008-2009 to SY 2009-

2010MEAN PERCENTAGE SCORE

We ranked 56 at NAT 2009 and at rank 54 at NAT 2010

Ranking of 5 Subjects tested

5

15

25

35

45

55

FIL-IPINO

HEKASI ENG-LISH

SCI-ENCE

MATH

% SCORE

72.92 56.12 49.72 45.73 41.77

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75Rank 1

Rank 2

Rank 3Rank 4

Rank 5

BOES MPS Ranking ...short glimpse

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 41.34 RANK

56

47.57RANK

66

51.66 RANK

56

53.25 RANK

54

BOES KINDERGARTEN MID-FINAL TEST RESULTS 2009-2010SY 2008-2009, They were at rank 6 in the district level. And rank 18 at the division level.

Now at SY 2009-2010, they are at rank 2 in the district level and at rank 16 at the division level.

CONGRATULATIONS!

mid final ave

2008-2009 96.14 98.72 97.43

2009-2010 97.59 98.82 98.21

94.75

95.25

95.75

96.25

96.75

97.25

97.75

98.25

98.75

District 2 Ranking of MID-FIN Performance

SY 2008-2009 we were at rank 13 by district level and at rank 65 at Division Level

Sad to say we are at rank 14 out of 14 schools which took the said tests at District 2 and at rank 63 out of 71 schools

in the Division of City Schools MANILA for the SY 2009-2010.

CENTE

X

M.H

IZON

LAKANDULA

G.DEL

PILAR

AC HER

RERA

F. B

ENIT

EZ

F.G C

ALDER

ON

LAPU-L

APU

PLARID

EL

M.P

ONCE

L.AVEL

INO

M.A

QUIN

O

G.DE

JESUS

BO.O

BRERO

0

20

40

60

8080.55

67.3566.2165.4264.8164.47 62.6 62.0461.7460.6860.3960.3659.8158.93

an analysis of th result of national achievement 2009 2010 part2

Documents

boes teachers performance

teachers ratings

slight correlation

said school

said test

teachers of boes handling

school years

average mastery