amy friez november 7, 2012 university of montana response to intervention and school counseling:

21
Amy Friez November 7, 2012 University of Montana Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Upload: kristina-ball

Post on 15-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Amy FriezNovember 7, 2012

University of Montana

Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Page 2: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Today’s Presentation

What is RTI? What does it look like in MT?Review of RtI & the ASCA National ModelRtI & Comprehensive Developmental School

Counseling Programs Are AlignedTiered Delivery SystemDATASocial JusticeConceptual ModelExercise & Group DiscussionRecommendations

Page 3: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

What do you know about RtI?

Page 4: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
Page 5: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Historically…

GeneralEducation

Title Reading or

Other Reading Support

Special Education

Some “Fell’”Through

Some “Fell’”Through

5

Page 6: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

The desired outcome…A Multi Tiered System of Supports

-Academic and Behavioral-

GeneralEducation Title & ,

Gifted Ed.

Special Education

&Gifted Ed.

IIIIIIII

= 6

Support and training for all staff all along the continuum

Page 7: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:
Page 8: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

RTI: A Brief Overview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsAqh2Pxg0A

Page 9: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Intervention Tiers

Tier One Research-based, high quality instruction for all Benchmark testing/screening of all students Progress monitoring of at risk students

Tier Two Small group, increased intensity instruction May involve separate curriculum Continued monitoring of student progress

Tier Three Individualized, intensive services Progress monitoring Referral for special services

National Joint Committee on LD, 2005Feiker-Hollenbeck, 2011Primary

Page 10: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

National Perspective

• 71% of districts are in some stage of implementing RTI – up from 60% in 2008 and 44% in 2007• RTI is being increasingly implemented across all grade levels with a significant increase in high school implementation compared to 2008• Of districts with enough data, 83% indicated RTI has reduced the number of referrals to special education• Districts reported the three primary obstacles to implementing RTI as: Insufficient teacher training, Lack of intervention resources, Lack of data, knowledge, skills for tracking/charting

2010 www.spectrumk12.com

Page 11: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Schools in Montana’s RTI Project

http://opi.mt.gov/Programs/SchoolPrograms/RTI/

Page 12: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

ASCA National Model

“How are students different because of what school counselors do?” (ASCA, 2003)

4 interconnected components:•Foundation•Delivery System•Management System•Accountability

Page 13: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

RTI ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS

1. Leadership

2. Evidence-based Curriculum and Instruction

3. Ongoing Assessment

4. Collaborative Teaming

5. Data-Based Decision Making

6. Fidelity of Implementation

7. Ongoing Training and Professional Development

8. Community and Family Involvement

Page 14: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

• Proactive• Collaborative• Data-driven• Multi-tiered • Whole-child focused • Equity and access to quality instruction and behavior support for ALL students

RtI& ASCA: A Natural Fit

Page 15: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Three Interconnected and Shared Elements

1. Tiered Delivery Models

2. Data & Use of Assessments

3. Social Justice and Advocacy

Page 16: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Tiered Delivery System

Outlines breadth and depth of SC interventions based on student needs

Emphasizes serving ALL students as foundation of program

Outlines SC time spent in Delivery services

Page 17: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Using & Assessing Data

Page 18: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Use and Assessment of DataNeeds assessments

–Academic, career or personal/social

–Delivered to students, parents/caregivers and/or school staff

•Pre-and post-tests or curriculum based measures to assess the learning of particular standards and skills

•Evaluate program interventions through the use of surveys given to students, staff or families

Page 19: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

RtIRtI ASCAASCA

Originally conceptualized as a means to address over-representation of minority students in special education

Advocated as a means of identifying students with LD, as an addition or alternative to the traditional discrepancy-based model

Strives to eliminate teacher bias in special education referrals

**Early research indicates that students placed in special education in an RtI framework represent the ethnic and socioeconomic diversity of classrooms and schools*(Speece, Case, & Eddy, 2003)

Ensure ALL students succeed and are as a result of RTI implementation

Transforming School Counseling Initiative (Education Trust, 1996)

Dismantle systemic policies that discriminate against certain types of students while simultaneously supporting others

Advocate for the rights of students, as well as calling for systemic investigation of such practices

Ensure ALL students succeed and are DIFFERENT as a result of ASCA implementation

Social Justice and Advocacy

Page 20: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Recommendations

Connect counseling interventions to the RtI structure Seek a Balanced Role Between a Service Provider and an RtI

Team Member Use of data to identify needs and evaluate effectiveness Implement research-based programs and interventions and

contribute to evidence-based practices within the field Serve as an advocate for historically underserved populations Use RtI as a vehicle for better serving all students Ockerman& Mason ISCA, 201123Knowing this

Page 21: AMY FRIEZ NOVEMBER 7, 2012 UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA Response to Intervention and School Counseling:

Amy FriezRTI Coordinator

Office of Public [email protected]

Questions?