amsterdam speechwriters conference 2014 talk

112
This slide was intentionally left blank

Upload: alexei-kapterev

Post on 14-Jul-2015

12.828 views

Category:

Presentations & Public Speaking


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

This slide was intentionally left blank

Page 2: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Slides: the love (and hate) of my life

— Alexei Kapterev —

Page 3: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

ISLIDES

Page 4: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

– Jessica Hische FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE

THE WORK YOU DOW H I L E Y O U

Y O U S H O U L D B E D O I N G

IS PROBABLY THE WORK

P rocrastinate

Page 5: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 6: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 7: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 8: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

HATE LOVE

Page 9: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Do we

slides?NEED

Page 10: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

TIMESSOME

Page 11: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

S L I D E S C R E A T E A M U C H

ATMOSPHERE(compared to reading, that is)

Less formal

Page 12: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

WHAT TO SAYREMIND YOU

Slides

Page 13: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

WHAT TO SAYREMIND YOU

SlidesCONSTRAINT

WITHOUT TOO MUCH

Page 14: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

BUT

Page 15: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

OUT OF PLACECOULD BE

Slides

Page 16: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 17: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 18: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

TIMESSOMESlides are great

Page 19: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 20: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 21: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 22: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

G R E A T

SlidesFOR THAT

ARE

Page 23: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

TECHNOLOGYARE

Slides

Page 24: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.

— Melvin Kranzberg

Page 25: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

ENHANCEC A N

your presentation

Slides

Page 26: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

OR

Page 27: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

They could

RUIN ITT O T A L L Y

Page 28: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

DIFFERENCE?What makes a

Page 29: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

WHAT’S THE BIG PROBLEM WITH SLIDES?

Page 30: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 31: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

PowerPoint® Presentation Flaws and Failures:

A Psychological Analysis (2012)

Stephen M. Kosslyn, Rogier A. Kievit,

Alexandra G. Russell, and Jennifer M. Shephard

Page 32: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Not enough information was provided to support the main point

Went through the presentation too slowly

Read word-for-word from notes or from the slides themselves

Slides contained too much material to absorb before the next slide was presented

The main point was obscured by lots of irrelevant detail

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

THE TOP 5 PROBLEMS

Page 33: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

WHAT’S THE BIG PROBLEM WITH SLIDES?

Page 34: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

TOO MUCH TEXT!It’s

Page 35: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 36: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

?SOLUTIONThe

Page 37: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

SIMPLE SLIDES!

Page 38: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

SIMPLE SLIDESare not the solution

Page 39: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT TO SAY!

P roblem No1:

Page 40: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

4 TEDsters rehearse

times

Page 41: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 42: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 43: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 44: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

NOT ENOUGH TEXTNot a problem for the audience

Page 45: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

HUGEP roblem for the speaker

NOT ENOUGH TEXTNot a problem for the audience

*

Page 46: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

THE STEVE JOBS WAY?

Page 47: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 48: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

The most striking thing about the 17-inch PowerBook, after the screen itself, is how brilliantly Apple managed to shrink the size of the machine built around that big display.

— Walt Mossberg, the Wall Street Journal

Sure, the PowerBook is an unusually wide 15.4 inches, but it is only one inch thick. Yet, it feels solid as a rock. It is just 10.2 inches deep and weighs only 6.8 pounds.

To get an idea of how sleek those dimensions are, compare the new PowerBook with another brand-new laptop, Dell’s Latitude D800.

This model also boasts a widescreen display, measuring 15.4 inches diagonally. But, even though the Dell has a significantly smaller screen, it looks like a whale next to the 17-inch PowerBook.

Page 49: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

P roblem No2:

CREDIBILITY

Page 50: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 51: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 52: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

CREDIBILITYwith a sophisticated audience

More complex slides add

Page 53: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

As soon as they can read children trust written text more than spoken information.

Corriveau et al. “To the letter: Early readers trust print–based over oral instructions to guide their actions”

British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2014)

Page 54: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

SIMPLE SLIDESare not the solution

Page 55: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

i s not the problemTOO MUCH TEXT

Page 56: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

THE TOP 5 PROBLEMS5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

Not enough information was provided to support the main point

Went through the presentation too slowly

Read word-for-word from notes or from the slides themselves

Slides contained too much material to absorb before the next slide was presented

The main point was obscured by lots of irrelevant detail

Page 57: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

TOO MUCH

NOT ENOUGH

Superficial Too nerdy

THE OPTIMAL BALANCE

Page 58: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

THE ANCIENT GREEK ORIGINS OF THE WORDS "TRUE" AND "TRUTH" HAVE SOME CONSISTENT DEFINITIONS THROUGHOUT GREAT SPANS OF HISTORY THAT WERE OFTEN ASSOCIATED WITH TOPICS OF LOGIC, GEOMETRY, MATHEMATICS, DEDUCTION, INDUCTION, AND NATURAL PHILOSOPHY. SOCRATES', PLATO'S AND ARISTOTLE'S IDEAS ABOUT TRUTH ARE SEEN BY SOME AS CONSISTENT WITH CORRESPONDENCE THEORY. IN HIS METAPHYSICS, ARISTOTLE STATED: "TO SAY OF WHAT IS THAT IT IS NOT, OR OF WHAT IS NOT THAT IT IS, IS FALSE, WHILE TO SAY OF WHAT IS THAT IT IS, AND OF WHAT IS NOT THAT IT IS NOT, IS TRUE".[54] THE STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY PROCEEDS TO SAY OF ARISTOTLE:"(...) ARISTOTLE SOUNDS MUCH MORE LIKE A GENUINE CORRESPONDENCE THEORIST IN THE CATEGORIES (12B11, 14B14), WHERE HE TALKS OF "UNDERLYING THINGS" THAT MAKE STATEMENTS TRUE AND IMPLIES THAT THESE "THINGS" (PRAGMATA) ARE LOGICALLY STRUCTURED SITUATIONS OR FACTS (VIZ., HIS SITTING, HIS NOT SITTING). MOST INFLUENTIAL IS HIS CLAIM IN DE INTERPRETATIONE (16A3) THAT THOUGHTS ARE "LIKENESSESS" (HOMOIOSIS) OF THINGS. ALTHOUGH HE NOWHERE DEFINES TRUTH IN TERMS OF A THOUGHT'S LIKENESS TO A THING OR FACT, IT IS CLEAR THAT SUCH A DEFINITION WOULD FIT WELL INTO HIS OVERALL PHILOSOPHY OF MIND. (…)"[54] VERY SIMILAR STATEMENTS CAN ALSO BE FOUND IN PLATO (CRATYLUS 385B2, SOPHIST 263B).[54] IN HINDUISM, TRUTH IS DEFINED AS "UNCHANGEABLE", "THAT WHICH HAS NO DISTORTION", "THAT WHICH IS BEYOND DISTINCTIONS OF TIME, SPACE, AND PERSON", "THAT WHICH PERVADES THE UNIVERSE IN ALL ITS CONSTANCY". THE HUMAN BODY, THEREFORE IS NOT COMPLETELY TRUE AS IT CHANGES WITH TIME, FOR EXAMPLE. THERE ARE MANY REFERENCES, PROPERTIES AND EXPLANATIONS OF TRUTH BY HINDU SAGES THAT EXPLAIN VARIED FACETS OF TRUTH, SUCH AS THE NATIONAL MOTTO OF INDIA: "SATYAMEVA JAYATE" (TRUTH ALONE WINS), AS WELL AS "SATYAM MUKTAYE" (TRUTH LIBERATES), "SATYA' IS 'PARAHIT'ARTHAM' VA'UNMANASO YATHA'RTHATVAM' SATYAM" (SATYA IS THE BENEVOLENT USE OF WORDS AND THE MIND FOR THE WELFARE OF OTHERS OR IN OTHER WORDS RESPONSIBILITIES IS TRUTH TOO), "WHEN ONE IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED IN SPEAKING TRUTH, THE FRUITS OF ACTION BECOME SUBSERVIENT TO HIM ( PATANJALI YOGASUTRAS, SUTRA NUMBER 2.36 ), "THE FACE OF TRUTH IS COVERED BY A GOLDEN BOWL. UNVEIL IT, O PUSAN (SUN), SO THAT I WHO HAVE TRUTH AS MY DUTY (SATYADHARMA) MAY SEE IT!" (BRHADARANYAKA V 15 1-4 AND THE BRIEF IISA UPANISAD 15-18), TRUTH IS SUPERIOR TO SILENCE (MANUSMRITI), ETC. COMBINED WITH OTHER WORDS, SATYA ACTS AS MODIFIER, LIKE "ULTRA" OR "HIGHEST," OR MORE LITERALLY "TRUEST," CONNOTING PURITY AND EXCELLENCE. FOR EXAMPLE, SATYALOKA IS THE "HIGHEST HEAVEN' AND SATYA YUGA IS THE "GOLDEN AGE" OR BEST OF THE FOUR

There i s no such thing as “TOO MUCH TEXT”

Page 59: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

for thi s audienceTOO MUCH TEXTThere i s

Page 60: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 61: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 62: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules

4 eras in Western European writing

10

Page 63: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule

• Roman majuscule

• Carolingian majuscule

• Gothic majuscule

4 eras in Western European writing

30

Page 64: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

50

Page 65: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

MAYBE TOO

MUCH

MAYBE NOT

ENOUGH

Page 66: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

1. Audience size

2. Their proficiency level

3. Need for handouts

4. Amount of time you have

THINGS TO CONSIDER4

Page 67: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Pictures areEXPENSIVE

WHILE TEXT IS RELATIVELY CHEAP

Page 68: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

MAYBE TOO

MUCH

MAYBE NOT

ENOUGH

€€€ €€€

Page 69: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 70: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

for one clickTOO MUCH TEXTThere i s

Page 71: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 72: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

✤ I’m not a fan of this effect

✤ or this effect

✤ or this effect

✤ OR THIS EFFECT

✤ this is more than enough

Animation

Page 73: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

with no structureTOO MUCH TEXTThere i s

Page 74: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 75: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 76: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

•Greek majuscule (9th - 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. - 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule •Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. - 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th - 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule •Carolingian majuscule (4th - 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 - 12th century) •Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules.

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 77: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 78: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

•Greek majuscule (9th - 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. - 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule •Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. - 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th - 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule •Carolingian majuscule (4th - 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 - 12th century) •Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules.

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 79: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

•Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule•Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule•Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)•Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules.

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 80: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules.

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 81: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules.

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 82: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules.

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 83: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 84: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

• Greek majuscule (9th – 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. – 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule

• Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. – 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th – 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule

• Carolingian majuscule (4th – 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 – 12th century)

• Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 85: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

•Greek majuscule (9th - 3rd century B.C.) in contrast to the Greek uncial script (3rd century B.C. - 12 century A.D.) and the later Greek minuscule •Roman majuscule (7th century B.C. - 4th century A.D.) in contrast to the Roman uncial (4th - 8th century B.C.), Roman Half Uncial, and minuscule •Carolingian majuscule (4th - 8th century A.D.) in contrast to the Carolingian minuscule (around 780 - 12th century) •Gothic majuscule (13th and 14th century), in contrast to the early Gothic (end of 11th to 13th century), Gothic (14th century), and late Gothic (16th century) minuscules.

4 eras in Western European writing

Page 86: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 87: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 88: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

BIG IMPORTANT

SMALL LESS IMPORTANT

Page 89: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 90: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

10/21/14 TechInvestLab.com2

Угроза Digital Divide

Для работы ему необходима физическая инфраструктура (провода, каналы радиосвязи). Задачу удвоения физической инфраструктуры невозможно осуществить без масштабной реформы связи как инфраструктурной отрасли.

Интернет – это протокол

Что такое Digital Divide Угроза отставания в области информационных технологий усугубляет общее отставание страны от мировых лидеров (Саммит G8, 2000 год).

Количество пользователейВ России доступ к Интернет имеют около 10% населения, а в соседней Финляндии – более 50% Одна из целей программы «Электронная Россия» — удвоение количества пользователей Интернета в стране.

10

Page 91: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

1. Context: How many? Who are they?

2. Priorities: What’s most important?

3. Visual cues: Size, colours, etc

4. Animation (if necessary)

MANAGING LOTS OF TEXT

Page 92: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

One moreEXAMPLE

AND I’M DONE

Page 93: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 94: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 95: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 96: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 97: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk
Page 98: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Data & Research

Analysis

Library

HR

Finance

Archive

Procurement

Investor support

Investment Promotion

Licensing

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION INVESTMENT

Administrative assistant Advisor

CEO

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 99: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Data & Research

Analysis

Library

HR

Finance

Archive

Procurement

Investor support

Investment Promotion

Licensing

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION INVESTMENT

Administrative assistant Advisor

CEO

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 100: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION INVESTMENT

CEO

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 101: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION INVESTMENT

CEO

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

Page 102: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION INVESTMENT

Data & Research

Analysis

Library

HR

Finance

Archive

Procurement

Investor support

Investment Promotion

Licensing

INVESTMENT SUPPORT AGENCY

CEOAdministrative assistant Advisor

Page 103: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

MAYBE TOO

MUCH

MAYBE NOT

ENOUGH

Page 104: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Large audience Small audience

THE OPTIMAL BALANCE

MORE TEXT

LITTLE TEXT

Page 105: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Do we

slides?NEED

Page 106: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Yes

S O M E T I M E S

Page 107: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

A LOT OF TEXT?Can we have

Page 108: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

CANYes we

Page 109: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

CANYes we

SOMETIMES

Page 110: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Complex slides requireDESIGNDESIGNDESIGN

Page 111: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

FOOD & BEERFOOD & BEER

W I L L

forFOOD & BEER

T O D A Y

DESIGNDESIGNDESIGN

Page 112: Amsterdam Speechwriters Conference 2014 Talk

Thank you!W W W . K A P T E R E V . C O M