amr asnmnt

Upload: snjb13459969

Post on 10-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    1/14

    PROJECT OBJECTIVE

    1. To reduce the number of attributes associated with buying of Laptops

    by the students of Tezpur University by using factor analysis method.

    2. To find the reliability of the findings as obtained from the factor

    analysis.

    SCOPE OF THE STUDY

    The scope of the study is limited to the students of the Tezpur University.

    LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

    1. The survey was limited to students of the Tezpur University.

    2. Sampling error might have occurred because no sample is a

    perfect representation of a given population unless the sample

    size equals the population.

    3. Response error might have occurred.

    4. Since the report is based on primary data and personal interview, occurrence

    of personal bias cannot be ruled. For respondents bias make take place if one

    tries to reflect his personality in a better way.

    SOURCES OF DATA

    Primary Source: - Primary data was obtained through the questionnaire

    designed for the different corporate offices in Guwahati.

    Secondary Source: - No secondary data was used for the survey.

    Data Collection methods:

    The primary data was collected using the following methods:-

    a) Questionnaire

    b) Personal Interview: -

    SAMPLING PLAN:

    A) Population: - All the students from the different departments of a

    University.

    B) Element: - All the students from Tezpur University are the element

    for the study.

    C) Sample Size: - 58 students from Tezpur University are the sample

    of the study both male and female.

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    2/14

    D) Sampling method: - The sampling used was judgmental and

    convenience sampling for the survey.

    ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY

    1.When all the samples of the study are consideredTotal Variance Explained

    Component Initial Eigenvalues

    Extraction Sums of SquaredLoadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

    Total% of

    VarianceCumulative

    % Total% of

    VarianceCumulati

    ve % Total % of VarianceCumulativ

    e %

    18.064 29.868 29.868 8.064

    29.86

    8

    29.86

    8

    3.585 13.278 13.278

    22.893 10.716 40.583 2.893

    10.716

    40.583

    3.240 11.998 25.276

    31.946 7.208 47.791 1.946 7.208

    47.791

    2.817 10.432 35.708

    41.717 6.360 54.151 1.717 6.360

    54.151

    2.663 9.864 45.572

    51.665 6.168 60.319 1.665 6.168

    60.319

    2.464 9.125 54.697

    61.386 5.134 65.453 1.386 5.134

    65.453

    2.127 7.877 62.574

    7 1.148 4.253 69.707 1.148 4.253 69.707

    1.926 7.133 69.707

    8 .995 3.686 73.3939 .894 3.312 76.70510 .787 2.917 79.62111 .771 2.856 82.47712 .713 2.639 85.11613 .634 2.348 87.46414 .520 1.925 89.38915 .474 1.754 91.14416 .412 1.524 92.66817 .377 1.398 94.06618 .302 1.118 95.18419 .268 .991 96.17620 .218 .808 96.98421 .189 .701 97.68522 .175 .648 98.33323 .135 .498 98.83224 .113 .418 99.25025 .092 .341 99.59126 .066 .244 99.835

    27 .044 .165 100.000

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    3/14

    Extraction Method: Principal Component AnalysisHere we see that 7 factors are representing 69.707% of the cases, so wecan conclude that the 27 factors we have taken can be reduced to

    Rotated Component Matrix(a)

    Component

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7F_price -.114

    .088 -.067 .059 .088 .254 .820

    F_battery back .304

    .033 .270 .136 -.308 .123 .654

    F_harddisk .335

    .436 .492 .167 .130 .060 .331

    F_warranty .125

    .276 .436 .000 .128 .361 .089

    F_wireless .834

    .220 .002 .133 .026 -.016 .119

    F_bluetooth .536

    .189 .383 .001 .421 -.332 .207

    F_LAN .852

    .089 .149 .093 .155 -.061 -.060

    F_Graphcard .313

    -.039 .069 .102 .722 .255 -.136

    F_soundqual .536

    -.048 .422 .214 .277 -.058 .052

    F_webcam .390

    -.207 .173 -.099 .380 -.167 .511

    F_CD/DVDwriter

    .787 .105 -.008 .089 .132 .351 .031

    F_Powrsav .139

    .131 .815 .043 -.035 .097 .069

    F_weight .323

    .180 .213 .637 -.021 .247 -.043

    F_scrnsize .002

    .152 .363 .701 .284 .216 -.038

    F_Fcerecog .112

    -.059 -.298 .698 .038 -.092 .362

    F_Oprtngsyst

    m

    .

    053.274 .071 .246 -.046 .773 .154

    F_Durablty . .214 .333 -.091 .228 .732 .131

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    4/14

    008F_shockabsorbnt

    -.066

    .237 .597 .388 .063 .275 -.090

    F_LockFacility .080

    .556 .302 .534 .160 .019 .073

    F_Heatabsrber .280

    .469 .397 .462 -.029 -.034 .095

    F_resolution -.034

    .249 .051 .069 .397 -.098 .255

    F_gaming .225

    .183 .095 .521 .512 -.230 -.041

    F_videocard .105

    .071 -.010 .081 .841 .134 .013

    F_brand .008

    .778 .010 .071 .033 .316 .199

    F_Aftrsalesservice

    .146 .700 .241 -.066 .220 .197 -.215

    F_Aesthetics .082

    .679 .451 .173 .100 .099 -.071

    F_colour .407

    .614 -.010 .296 -.111 .113 .058

    Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method:Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.a Rotation converged in 15 iterations.

    ScreePlot

    Component Number

    27252321191715131197531Eigenvalue

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0

    Factor1(Communication)

    Factor2Quality

    Factor3Assurance

    Factor4Handling

    Factor5Graphics

    Factor6Operations

    Factor7Economy

    1. Wireless2. Bluetooth3. LAN4. Sound Quality

    5. CD/DVD

    1. Lockfacility2. Heatabsorber3. Brand4. After

    sales5. Aest

    1. Hard disk2. Warranty3. Powersaving

    4. Shock

    1. Weight2. Screensize3. Face

    recognition

    1. Graphiccard2. Resolution3. Ga

    ming*4. Vid

    1. Operatingsystem2. Durability

    1. Price2. BatteryBackup3. We

    bcam

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    5/14

    writer hetics6. Colour

    absorbent

    eocard

    R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

    No ofcases=55.0No of Items =

    5

    N of Cases =57.0N of Items = 6

    N of Items =57N of Items =4

    N of Cases =56.0N of Items =3

    N of Cases =57.0N of Items =4

    N of Cases =57.0N of Items = 2

    N of Cases =56.0N of Items = 3

    Alpha = .8511

    Alpha = .8477

    Alpha =.7347

    Alpha =.6201

    Alpha =.3179

    Alpha =.7498

    Alpha =.5744

    Reliable Reliable Reliable NotReliable

    NotReliable

    Reliable NotReliable

    *Gaming has been transferred to factor 5 although it comes under factor 4

    according to the analysis as it matches to the factors under 5.

    KMO and Bartlett's Test

    Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of

    Sampling Adequacy..671

    Bartlett's Testof Sphericity

    Approx. Chi-Square

    840.372

    df 351Sig. .000

    From the table it is found that KMO value is greater than 0.5, thus

    findings are desirable.

    Bartetts test of sphericity

    H0= There is relationship between the factors

    H1= There is no relationship between the factors

    Here the p-value of .000 which is less than .1, therefore null hypothesis is

    rejected.

    Therefore there is no relationship between the factors.

    2.When only male samples are considered

    Total Variance Explained(a)

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    6/14

    Component Initial Eigenvalues

    Extraction Sums ofSquared Loadings

    Rotation Sums of SquaredLoadings

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    7/14

    Total

    % ofVariance

    Cumulative

    % Total

    % ofVariance

    Cumulative

    % Total

    % ofVarian

    ceCumulative

    %

    18.794

    32.571

    32.5718.79

    432.57

    132.571

    4.822

    17.860

    17.860

    2 4.568 16.920

    49.492 4.568

    16.920

    49.492 4.817

    17.839

    35.700

    32.160 8.000 57.491

    2.160

    8.000 57.4913.30

    812.25

    247.952

    41.786 6.616 64.107

    1.786

    6.616 64.1072.14

    07.926 55.878

    51.605 5.945 70.052

    1.605

    5.945 70.0522.00

    27.414 63.291

    61.348 4.993 75.045

    1.348

    4.993 75.0451.86

    26.897 70.188

    7 1.150 4.258 79.303 1.150 4.258 79.303 1.831 6.782 76.971

    81.082 4.007 83.310

    1.082

    4.007 83.3101.71

    16.339 83.310

    9 .976 3.614 86.92310 .639 2.366 89.28911 .611 2.264 91.55312 .519 1.923 93.47513 .454 1.681 95.15714 .388 1.437 96.59315 .276 1.022 97.615

    16 .195 .724 98.33917 .179 .662 99.00018 .087 .322 99.32319 .067 .249 99.57120 .062 .229 99.80121 .027 .101 99.90122 .016 .060 99.96223

    .010 .038100.00

    0

    24 2.429E-16

    8.996E-16

    100.000

    25 -8.183E-17

    -3.031E-16

    100.000

    26 -2.791E-16

    -1.034E-15

    100.000

    27 -8.978E-16

    -3.325E-15

    100.000

    Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

    a Only cases for which Gender = Male are used in the analysis phase.

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    8/14

    Here we see that 8 factors are representing 83.310% of the cases, so wecan conclude that the 27 factors we have taken can be reduced to 8.

    Scree Plot

    Component Number

    27252321191715131197531

    Eigenvalue

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0

    -2

    Rotated Component Matrix(a,b)

    Component

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8F_price .002 .197 .011 .177 .871 .006 .033 .109F_batteryback

    .313 .153 .246 .043 .639 .290 -.354 .091

    F_harddisk .633 .539 .190 .274 .246 .045 -.101 .043F_warranty

    .106 .435 .404 -.198 .267 .155 .371-.36

    3F_wireless .856 .101 .020 .177 -.084 -.097 .294 .164

    F_bluetooth .784 -.106 .095 .257 .120 .150 -.104 -.031

    F_LAN.867 .072 .150 .108 -.166 .096 .028

    -.177

    F_Graphcard.258 .048 .174 .307 -.121 .060 .828

    -.096

    F_soundqual.728 -.102 .263 -.012 .213 .149 .076

    -.392

    F_webcam .725 -.301 -.151 -.183 .142 .359 .116 .198F_CD/DVDwri .634 .354 .052 -.043 .040 .146 .503 -.02F_Powrsav

    .417 .370 .229 .321 .200 .239 -.370-.26

    2F_weight .221 .467 .519 .316 -.115 .141 .010 .060F_scrnsize .106 .328 .689 .470 .010 .241 -.023 .108F_Fcerecog

    -.098 .133 .151 .033 .235 .176 -.042.

    781F_Oprtngsystm

    -.120 .712 .411 -.144 .228 -.199 .110 .244

    F_Durablty-.002 .783 .231 -.278 .279 .092 .039

    -.327

    F_shockabsorbnt

    .007 .814 .170 .069 -.067 -.002 .019 .040

    F_LockFacilit

    y .065 .555 .604 .029 -.098 .270 -.073 .321F_Heatabsrber .242 .548 .248 -.020 -.169 .589 -.186 .196

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    9/14

    F_resolution .312 -.125 .105 .185 .187 .821 .169 .039F_gaming .182 -.066 .135 .879 .152 .044 .129 .056F_videocard

    .455 .059 .118 .574 .189 .167 .395-.20

    9F_brand -.029 .820 .089 .082 .408 -.142 .043 .100

    F_Aftrsalesservice -.047 .556 .170 .267 .033 .277 .271 -.475F_Aesthetics

    .081 .365 .747 .092 .111 .267 .023-.08

    8F_colour

    .155 .092 .870 .024 .131 -.172 .173-.00

    9

    Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method:Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.a Rotation converged in 14 iterations.b Only cases for which Gender = Male are used in the analysis phase

    Factor1Facilities

    Factor2Assurance

    Factor3Features

    Factor4Gamezone

    Factor5Economic

    Factor6Resolution

    Factor7Graphiccard

    Factor8Facerecognition

    F_soundqualF_webcamF_CD/DVDwriterF_PowrsavF_wirelessF_bluetooth

    F_LANF_harddisk

    F_warrantyF_OprtngsystmF_DurabltyF_shockabsorbntF_brandF_Aftrsaless

    erviceF_Heatabsrber*

    F_weightF_scrnsizeF_LockFacilityF_AestheticsF_colour

    F_videocardF_gaming

    F_priceF_battery back

    F_resolution

    F_Graphcard

    F_Fcerecog

    R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

    No ofcases=55.0No ofitems

    =8

    No ofcases=57.0No ofitems

    =8

    No ofcases=56.0No ofitems

    =5

    No ofcases=57.0No ofitems

    =2

    No ofcases=56.0No of

    items=

    2Alpha=0.8541

    Alpha=0.8371

    Alpha=

    0.8329

    Alpha=

    0.6680

    Alpha=0.6285

    Reliable

    Reliable Reliable

    NotReliable

    NotReliabl

    e* Heat absorbent has been transferred to factor 2 although it comes under

    factor 6 according to the analysis as it matches to the factors under 2.

    * In case of factors 6, 7and 8, the reliability testing is not possibleas there are only one variable under this factors.

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    10/14

    KMO and Bartlett's Test

    Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure ofSampling Adequacy. .671

    Bartlett's Testof Sphericity

    Approx. Chi-Square

    840.372

    Df 351Sig. .000

    From the table it is found that KMO value is greater than 0.5, thus findings

    are desirable

    Bartetts test of sphericity

    H0= There is relationship between the factors

    H1= There is no relationship between the factors

    Here the p-value of .000 which is less than .1, therefore null hypothesis is

    rejected.

    Therefore there is no relationship between the factors.

    3 When only female samples are considered

    Total Variance Explained(a)

    Component Initial Eigenvalues

    Extraction Sums of SquaredLoadings

    Rotation Sums of SquaredLoadings

    Total

    % ofVarianc

    eCumulati

    ve % Total% of

    VarianceCumulati

    ve % Total% of

    VarianceCumulati

    ve %

    1 8.865 32.835 32.835 8.865 32.835 32.835 4.435 16.425 16.425

    2 3.033 11.233 44.068 3.033 11.233 44.068 3.390 12.557 28.982

    3 2.315 8.575 52.643 2.315 8.575 52.643 3.353 12.419 41.401

    4 1.987 7.358 60.001 1.987 7.358 60.001 2.774 10.273 51.674

    51.786 6.613 66.614 1.786 6.613 66.614 2.723 10.085 61.7596 1.594 5.905 72.519 1.594 5.905 72.519 1.998 7.400 69.159

    7 1.270 4.706 77.224 1.270 4.706 77.224 1.686 6.243 75.401

    8 1.161 4.300 81.524 1.161 4.300 81.524 1.653 6.122 81.524

    9 .901 3.338 84.862

    10 .791 2.929 87.791

    11 .582 2.157 89.947

    12 .484 1.793 91.740

    13 .427 1.580 93.320

    14 .397 1.470 94.790

    15 .337 1.248 96.037

    16 .243 .901 96.93817 .192 .710 97.648

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    11/14

    18 .175 .649 98.297

    19 .162 .600 98.897

    20 .121 .450 99.347

    21 .065 .240 99.587

    22 .043 .160 99.747

    23 .028 .103 99.85024 .017 .064 99.914

    25 .013 .048 99.962

    26 .006 .024 99.986

    27 .004 .014 100.000

    Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.a Only cases for which Gender = Female are used in the analysis phase.

    Here we see that 8 factors are representing 83.310% of the cases, so wecan conclude that the 27 factors we have taken can be reduced to 8.

    Scree Plot

    Component Number

    27252321191715131197531

    Eigenvalue

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0

    Rotated Component Matrix(a,b)

    Component

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8F_price .019 -.026 -.087 -.013 -.076 .036 -.073 .873F_batteryback

    .152 .089 -.042 -.072 .862 -.239 -.050 -.003

    F_harddisk .468 .398 .230 -.006 .410 -.063 -.225 .331F_warranty .079 -.100 .241 .040 .563 .324 .246 .459

    F_wireless .578 .079 .370 -.057 .212 .383 .072 .394F_bluetooth .734 .086 .234 .275 .336 .246 .179 .063F_LAN .816 .061 .144 .223 .119 .231 -.109 -.026F_Graphcard .597 .060 -.140 .576 .138 .146 .177 .015F_soundqual .337 .767 .124 .183 -.096 .101 .111 -.143F_webcam .687 .138 .092 .275 -.031 -.033 .175 -.011F_CD/DVDwriter

    .688 .144 .121 .110 .019 .100 .546 -.098

    F_Powrsav .072 .150 .189 -.181 .718 .234 .314 -.291F_weight .130 .383 -.031 .056 -.035 .857 -.097 .042F_scrnsize .083 .815 .098 .110 -.051 .411 .079 .126

    F_Fcerecog .134 .269 -.081 .616 -.293 .427 .143 .130F_Oprtngsyst .346 .083 .043 .094 .197 -.050 .715 -.208

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    12/14

    mF_Durablty .758 .345 .150 -.042 .000 -.334 .120 .062F_shockabsorbnt

    .095 .841 .091 .014 .340 -.004 .142 -.037

    F_LockFacilit

    y

    .281 .468 .442 .413 .206 .158 -.037 .119

    F_Heatabsrber

    .153 .494 .434 .348 .465 .078 -.067 .046

    F_resolution -.019 .159 .188 .248 -.031 -.079 .603 .427F_gaming .193 .481 .222 .731 .053 .082 -.019 -.082F_videocard .196 -.044 .007 .899 -.112 -.116 .142 .004F_brand .209 .060 .813 -.030 -.258 -.296 .132 .023F_Aftrsalesservice

    .492 .262 .601 -.179 -.026 -.221 -.149 .065

    F_Aesthetics .033 .160 .810 .121 .406 .008 .181 -.038F_colour .134 .077 .854 .055 .146 .279 .048 -.049

    Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method:Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.a Rotation converged in 24 iterations.b Only cases for which Gender = Female are used in the analysis phase.

    * In case of factors 6 and 8, the reliability testing is not possibleas there are only one variable under this factors.

    Factor 1Facility

    Factor2EXTRAFACILITY

    Factor3BRAND

    Factor4GAMING

    Factor5ASSURANCE

    Factor6

    Factor7OPERATION

    Factor8

    Hard diskWirelessBluetooth

    LANGraphicscardWebcamDurabilityF_CD/DVDwriter

    SoundqualityScreen size

    Shockabsorbent

    Lock Facility

    Heatabsorber

    ColourAesthetics

    AftersalesserviceBrand

    Facerecognition

    GamingVideocard

    BatterybackupWarranty

    Power save

    Weight

    Resoluti

    on

    Operating

    system

    Price

    R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)

    No of

    cases=56.0No of

    items=8

    No of

    cases=56.0No of

    items=5

    No of

    cases=57.0No ofitems

    =4

    No of

    cases=57.0No ofitems

    =3

    No of

    cases=57.0No of

    items=3

    No of

    cases=57.0No of

    items=2

    Alpha=0.8128

    Alpha=0.8014

    Alpha=0.7845

    Alpha=0.5479

    Alpha=0.5798

    Alpha=0.0859

    Reliable Reliable Reliable Notreliable

    Notreliable

    Notreliable

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    13/14

    KMO and Bartlett's Test(a)

    Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure ofSampling Adequacy. .401

    Bartlett's Testof Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 643.651df 351Sig. .000

    a Only cases for which Gender = Female are used in the analysis phase.From the table it is found that KMO value is lesser than 0.5, thus findings

    are not desirable

    Bartetts test of sphericity

    H0= There is relationship between the factors

    H1= There is no relationship between the factors

    Here the p-value of .000 which is less than .1, therefore null hypothesis is

    rejected.

    Therefore there is no relationship between the factors.

    An Assignment on ADVANCED

    MARKETING RESEARCHTopic: Factor Analysis

    Submitted to

  • 8/8/2019 AMR asnmnt

    14/14

    Dr. Mrinmoy Kr Sarma,

    Department of Business Administration

    Tezpur University

    Submitted by

    Sanjeeb Kr. Choudhury(BAM08007)

    Hemendu Arnav Neog(BAM08010)

    Sreema Baidya (BAM08034)