western irrigation futures customer information sessions may 2010 werribee irrigation district

Post on 05-Jan-2016

40 Views

Category:

Documents

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Western Irrigation Futures Customer Information Sessions May 2010 Werribee Irrigation District. Today's discussion …. Key feedback from customer workshops and surveys Key findings from WIF Bulk water Infrastructure options Environment On-farm management Possible path forward - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Western Irrigation Futures

Customer Information Sessions May 2010

Werribee Irrigation District

2

Today's discussion …

1. Key feedback from customer workshops and surveys

2. Key findings from WIF

– Bulk water

– Infrastructure options

– Environment

– On-farm management

3. Possible path forward

– Water and channel system

4. Next steps

– Customer reference group

– Next season

3

Recap…

WIF Atlas

Customer Consultation

Technical Workshops

Draft Options Paper

Detailed Technical Work

Bulk Water Environment Infrastructure On farm

Final Options Paper

Customer engagement and consultation

Government / Agency consultation

Today’s

discussion

4

1. Customer Feedback

5

What you told us you would like…

• Key Issues

– Fit-for-purpose water

– Sufficient volume to support historic production levels

– Water at affordable price, and

– Fix leaky channels

• Other concerns raised

– Farming viability

– Agricultural practices

– Future of the district

6

2. Key Findings:Bulk Water

7

Bulk water options investigated…

• River water • Desalination of recycled water

– Reverse Osmosis (RO)– Nanofiltration (NF)– Electrodialysis Reversal/Ultra Violet

• Trading options – North/South pipe line– Macalister Irrigation District

• Metro water– Water from Melbourne Pool via entitlement or supply agreement

• Recycled water – Continuation of supply from WTP – Enhancements

•Storage•Increased flow rates

• Groundwater• Storm water harvesting

8

River water supply – climate scenarios…

Lerderderg River Seasonal Inflows (at Sardine Creek)

9

Salinity at Melton Reservoir and Werribee Weir…

EC Werribee River

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

1/07

/200

7

1/08

/200

7

1/09

/200

7

1/10

/200

7

1/11

/200

7

1/12

/200

7

1/01

/200

8

1/02

/200

8

1/03

/200

8

1/04

/200

8

1/05

/200

8

1/06

/200

8

1/07

/200

8

1/08

/200

8

1/09

/200

8

1/10

/200

8

1/11

/200

8

1/12

/200

8

1/01

/200

9

1/02

/200

9

1/03

/200

9

1/04

/200

9

1/05

/200

9

1/06

/200

9

1/07

/200

9

1/08

/200

9

1/09

/200

9

1/10

/200

9

1/11

/200

9

1/12

/200

9

1/01

/201

0

1/02

/201

0

1/03

/201

0

1/04

/201

0

EC

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

Rat

io W

errib

ee W

eir

to M

elto

n sa

linity

Melton

Werribee weir

WerribeeWeir/Melton ratio

10

Desalination of recycled water…

• 3 technology 0ptions Investigated…– Reverse Osmosis (RO)– Nanofiltration (NF)– Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR) and disinfection

• Capital cost

– based on taking salt from recycled water and mixing it with the standard recycled water – This is the cheapest option

Quality / Volume 40 ML/day 65 ML/day 90 ML/day

1,000 EC $130m – $170m $170m – $230m $210m – $280m

1,300 EC $110m –$140m $130m – $180m $150m – $210M

1,500 EC $90m – $120m $120m – $160m $140m – $190m

11

Desalination recycled water supply cost…

Supply system Efficiency $ per ML

No channel improvement 65% $2,562

Piped channels 90%+ $2,186

Lined channels 85% $2,097

• Assumptions…– 1500EC target– 65ML day supplied

12

Trading options…

•North South Pipeline

– Government committed to maximum 75,000 ML

– Commitment to Northern Irrigators that this would be maximum amount

– Option to access water from northern Victoria not available

• MID – Thomson Dam

– 11,000 ML Entitlement on key rivers in the MID

– 30% can be transferred across the system

– Water must be purchased and water transferred through district.

– Cost to transfer is $430 per ML for 2009/10.

– Must be delivered with another product (river / recycled water)

13

Other options…

• Groundwater

– Fully allocated and currently not available

– Deeper aquifer is salty and not suitable without high cost treatment

• Storm water

– MWC currently investigating storm water harvesting options that may provide water for irrigation in the long term

14

2. Key Findings:Infrastructure Options

15

Infrastructure options ….

• Pipelining

– Options investigated included piping 44 km

• Pumped pressure pipe system, and

• Gravity piped system

» $44m and subject to cost escalation

– Has a life expectancy of 80 years

– Provides highest efficiency 90%+

– Full cost recovery over 25 years

16

Infrastructure options ….

• Channel lining

– Options investigated included

• Lining with polypropylene roll out liners

• Spray-on membrane liners

• Life 25 years

– Expected efficiency 85%

– Cost ranges from $16m – $20m

• Water measurement

– Remote control regulators installed at key sites

• Improve measurement and operation flexibility

– Customer outlets – metering to use magflow meters

– Total cost – approx $2m

17

2. Key Findings:Environmental issues

21

23

On-farm issues …

• Commercial considerations– Cost of production – Choice, mix and rotation of crop types– Scale of operation and constraints– Land values, planning regulations and impacts of development on farming

• Water resource availability– Security of water supply to grow crops – Scope to reduce water use by utilising other irrigation methods

• Agronomy and water quality– Identification and costing of best practice requirements for irrigation, soil

salinity and nutrient management

• Environmental implications– Understanding of potential impacts

• Social factors– Social, cultural, adoption of technology, management practices and business

decisions

24

3. Possible Path Forward

25

Possible future supply approach…

• Government announced access to 2000ML of Melbourne’s water

– Potential to use most metro water in summer to reduce recycled water salinity to 1,600 EC’s

– Total flow rate increased from 60ML/d to approximately 80ML/d

– Potential to ‘bundle up’ and offer a ‘shandy’ (river / recycle / metro water) product at a single price from 2011/12

• Means everyone pays, everyone gets salinity benefit

– We would only access metro water when

• River water allocations are low and

• Salinity is high

• Supply may include a mix of river water (when available), recycled water and potable water to lower salinity

• Channel lining, metering and some automation

26

What does this mean for customers…

• Improved outcome

– More water available for irrigation

– Access to lower salinity water to improve soil salinity and plant health

– Reduced application of soil conditioners and other additives and therefore less on farm cost

– Potential to increased on-farm production, yield and crop quality

– Long term supply contract

– Improved viability of farming

• Leads to environmentally sustainable outcomes for the district

• The trade off

– Higher price for recycled /metro water

– Greater take or pay commitment

27

Recycled water…

• Currently contracted to 2019 • MOU being developed with Melbourne Water

– Revision of current agreement from 1 July 2011 for 20 to 25 years– Use current base price from the recycled plant (continued subsidy)– 60 ML day flow rate; 11,100ML per year contract volume – best

endeavors above that (as per now)– Additional costs to be paid by growers for significant service

improvements as determined via regulatory processes, e.g.• Storage (reliability) • Larger pipe and pump (higher flow rates )

– Desire for increased ‘take or pay’ component – currently 25%– Best endeavors reliability – as per now

• Improvement options– Storage– Flow rate enhancements

28

Effective price comparison…

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Sta

tus

Qu

o

De-s

al:

pip

ed

De-s

al:

lin

ed

Metr

o:

pip

ed

Metr

o:

lin

ed

Eff

ecti

ve C

harg

e (

$/M

L)

Effective Price =

Total volume delivered Total price paid

No rebate10% water allocation

29

Effective charges…

31

4. Key FindingsNext steps

32

Consultation process…

• Establish Customer Reference Groups – WID and BMID

• Seek nominations– 1 WBMCCC for each group– 6 customer representatives for each group – Stakeholder representatives

• Appoint independent chair

• Terms of reference to include– Bulk water supply options – Pricing matters– Infrastructure issues (e.g. channels and storages)– Environmental matters – Contract matters (recycled water, other bulk supplies)

• How do you get onto the Customer Reference Group?

33

SRW in consultation with CRG…

• Finalise district strategy

• Communicate strategy to all customers

• Develop new customer contracts

• Develop business case to support infrastructure investment

• Implement strategy

• Transition to new operating arrangements 2011-2013

34

District update…

• Recycled water supply

– Continue supply up to 68ML day

• River water

– Expect minimum 6% starting allocation

– Expect water quality to improve with increase in allocation

• Metro water

– Available for next season

– Discussion required on how this is offered

– Delivery price in the order of $960 per ML for 2010/11

– Detail to be worked through with CRG

35

Questions?

top related