wave-induced transport and turbulence influence in the mlt-x · • wave transport affects...

Post on 18-Oct-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Wave-induced Transport and Turbulence Influence

in the MLT-X

Alan Z. Liu Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

AirglowMetals

Graphics from CEDAR: The New Dimension

Space-Atmosphere-Interaction Region (SAIR) MLT Extended (MLT-X)

Momentum TransportMomentum fluxhw0u0i hw0v0i

Meriwether and Gerrard 2004

Wave Transporthw0T 0i hw0⇢0ciSensible Heat flux Constituent flux

• Fundamental processes that affect the energy balance, chemistry and composition in MLT-X

• Dissipating waves induce vertical heat flux and constituent flux of passive species

• Wave transport affects distribution of all constituents

Flux Measurement

Na Lidar Jan 5, 2000

SOR

at SOR (35N)hw0T 0i

Gardner and Liu

Heating Rate

Modeling GW Heat Flux

Yiğit and Medvedev, 2009

MSIS

No GW Heating/Cooling

Include GW Heating/Cooling

“in the high latitudes, the contribution of GWs is between 20 and 40% of that by the Joule heating”

Effects of Na Flux at SOR

0

500

500

500

500

500

500

500

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

10001000

1500

1500

1500

1500

1500

15001500

2000

2000

2000

20002000

2000

2000

20002500

2500

2500

30003000

3000

2500

2500

2500

3500

3500

3500

4000

4000

40003000

3000

3000

4500

4500

4500

5000

5000

3500

3500

3500

5500

55004000

4000 6000

6000

4500

45006500

6500

5000

7000

5500

Month

Alt

itu

de

(km

)a) Na Density (cm

−3)

J F M A M J J A S O N D80

85

90

95

100

105

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

−275

−250−225

−225

−200

−200

−175−175 −150−150

−125

−125

−125

−100

−100

−10

0

−100

−75

−75

−75

−75

−75

−50

−50

−50

−50

−50

−50

−50

−50

−25

−25

−25

−25

−250

0

0

0

25

−25

−25

−75

25

−75

Month

Alt

itu

de

(km

)b) Vertical Na Flux (cm

−3ms

−1)

J F M A M J J A S O N D85

90

95

100

−200

−150

−100

−50

0

50

Measured Na Flux at SOR

−150

−150−100

−100

−50

−50

−50

−50 −50

0

0 0

50

50

50

00

0

00

50

−50

−50

−50

0

0

0

0

100

100

0

−50

−50

150

−50

−50

100

200

50

−50

25050

−100

Month

Alt

itu

de

(km

)Na Production Rate (cm

−3hr

−1)

J F M A M J J A S O N D85

90

95

100

−150

−100

−50

0

50

100

150

Effects of Na Flux at SOR

• caused by instabilities • isotropic at small scales (<100-200 km) • represented as eddy diffusion

Turbulence

A TMA trail showing the billow structure between 96 and 98 km which was dynamically unstable. (M. Larsen)

Turbulent Oxygen Mixing Experiment (TOMEX)!Oct 2000, SOR, White Sands (J. Hecht)

Eddy Diffusion Coefficient Kzz

Lübeken et al 1987 0.1 ~ 100 m2/s!

0.2 ~ 10,000 m2/s

Rocket born instruments

Bishop et al. 2004: 50 ~ 2000 m2/sTMA Release

Hocking 1985: 50 ~ 1000 m2/sRadars

Airglow Battaner and Molina 1980100 ~ 1000 m2/s

Kelley et al. 2003~ 500 m2/s

Persistent Leonid Meteor Trail SOR, 1999

SummaryWave transport and turbulences • have large impacts to the background atmosphere • affect all constituents, important for a wide range of

problems: ‣ general circulation ‣ metal and airglow chemistry ‣ energy balance ‣ cosmic dust input etc.

• are universal processes • vary widely with location and time

Science Goals1. To quantify the wave-induced transport

and turbulence Long-term measurements of wave flux at multiple locations High resolution turbulence measurements to enable direct estimate of turbulence effects

2. To assess their influence on the MLT-X Improved GW parameterization to include wave transports that are consistent with observations Direct simulation of wave breaking and turbulence

Challenges of the MLT-XWave transport and turbulence are small scale processes that

• have large spatial and temporal variabilities, and • impact large scale phenomena

Observational Challenges • Global 3D coverage is needed because of varying wave

source and dynamical states of the atmosphere. • Local continuous coverages are needed to allow study of

their impacts on tides and planetary waves

Modeling Challenge • Proper representation of these processes in GCMs • Consistent with physics and observation, without breaking

the models

Driving Need - Measurement✓ High accuracy wind (<0.5 m/s error), temperature

(<0.5 K error) and constituent perturbation (< 1% error) measurements at high temporal (< 10 sec) and vertical resolutions (< 50 m)

✓ Extension to higher altitudes (~200 km) to cover MLT-X

3. Driving Need - Instruments• Large Power-Aperture Doppler Lidar

• High resolution airglow imager

• Radars

• Satellites

• New technology …

Promising Lidar Capabilities

LZT Na Broadband Lidar!Pfrommer, T., P. Hickson, C.-Y. She (2009)

CU Na Dopper Lidar, 12/17/2011

enables direct measure of eddy transport to obtain eddy diffusion coefficient

Promising Lidar Capabilities

Fe density at McMurdo, 6/1/13 CU Fe Boltzmann Lidar

Na density at Cerro Pachón, 5/27/2014!UIUC-ERAU Na Doppler Lidar

Airglow Imager

Mike Taylor, OH(3,1) band intensity image

OASISEXPLORING

THE INTERACTION OF EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE WITH SPACE

THE OBSERVATORY FOR ATMOSPHERE SPACE INTERACTION STUDIES An Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences Community Report

Submitted to the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

January 2014

3. Driving Need - Model• GW parameterization can be improved to include

wave heat and constituent flux • Direct simulation of gravity waves in GCMs • Direct simulation of turbulence to understand wave

dissipation process

Fritts et al.

• Model measurable constituent distribution such as Na for validation (Plane et al.)

Comments?

This image of sunlight scattered by cosmic dust that orbits the sun in the ecliptic (zodiacal light), was obtained at the European Southern Observatory’s La Silla Observatory, Chile in September 2009. (Image courtesy of ESO/Y. Beletsky)

top related