vocational education: a backbone for the development of chile by gonzalo vargas (council of...
Post on 21-Feb-2017
90 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
SPEAKER
Gonzalo Vargas
VOCATIONAL EDUCATION:
A BACKBONE FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF CHILE
Chancellor INACAP
President
Council of Accredited Professional Institutes and Technical Education Centers.
December, 2016
AGENDA
WHO ARE
WE?
WHAT DO WE
PROPOSE?
WHO ARE WE?
THE COUNCIL NOWADAYS
18 Vocational Education
Institutions
Cities in
the
country 33 85%
Enrollment
of the
sector
THE COUNCIL NOWADAYS
150,000 New students in 2014,
equivalent to 44% of
higher education
420,000 Total students;
equivalent to 35% of
higher education
in Chile
WHAT DO WE PROPOSE?
Expand access and
formative success
Improve the
appropriateness
and quality of
education
Improve the
articulation of the
educational system
Axis of the
proposal
Development Strategy 2014 -2024
A systemic focus that combines structural and far-reaching
measures with others established for the short-term, which will
allow progress in the challenges faced to strengthen ESTP, in
agreement with the current requirements of society, the
productive sector and the development of people.
QUALITY
ASSURANCE
20 propositions
ARCHITECTURE
OF
THE SYSTEM
FINANCING
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS AND
VALUATION
FOR
ESTP
PROPOSALS
1. Establish a National Qualification Framework
2. Suppress the distinction between academic titles and
degrees
3. Increase flexibility of formation modalities
4. Implement a System of Academic Credits
5. Create an assessment system for the quality of
learning in high schools
6. Foster acknowledgement of previous learning
7. Create sector councils for competences “Skill
Councils”
8. Establish a particular quality assurance framework for
ESTP
9. Ensure objectivity for the processes of accreditation,
their transparency and adequate dissemination
10.Promote the appropriateness of assessing peers for
the accreditation of ESTP institutions
PROPOSALS
11. Coordinate institutional and career accreditation
processes
12. Financing for the students
13. Clear and transparent methodology for the
reference enrollment fee
14. Improve management and administration for
financing mechanisms
15. Equalization of the conditions to enroll and assign
grant funds for all higher education institutions
16. Improve the information system for higher
education
17.Generate performance indicators for ESTP
institutions
18.Create a unique registry for students
19. Implement a vocational and career orientation
system
20.Develop a national program to foster the valuation
and social prestige of ESTP
TREND: TOTAL ENROLLMENT
Source: National Education Council (CNDE)
163,049
148,375 151,042 152,801 156,226 153,815 161,504 165,636
170,748 167,578
95,020 97,222
100,148 105,091 108,474
113,981 118,702 122,353 126,154 128,155 132,029
137,047
59,632 68,601
72,039 79,168
86,814 92,821 96,078
102,562 109,792
114,777 116,952 119,351
124,835
151,877 166,741 167,890
186,787 205,360
231,456 240,853
227,334 227,712 221,739 221,358
124,835
129,570
217,959
252,055
282,545
318,253
347,611
369,689 377,910
71,506 72,887 83,575 92,875
120,984
134,856 132,752 137,121 139,837 141,413
137,978
-
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
125,000
150,000
175,000
200,000
225,000
250,000
275,000
300,000
325,000
350,000
375,000
400,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
2.5
1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
EE.UU.Canadá
ChileCorea
Nueva Zel.Finlandia
Reimo UnidoAustria
SueciaPaíses bajos
EstoniaAustralia
IsraelJapón
PromedioRusia
Rep. ChecaLetoniaTurquíaFranciaBégicaPoloniaMéxicoIrlanda
PortugalHungría
AlemaniaEspaña
EsloveniaIslandia
EslovaquiaItalia
IndonesiaLuxemburgo
3.6
3.5
0 1 2 3 4 5
Nueva Zel.Islandia
PortugalReino Unido
IrlandaIsrael
BélgicaAustralia
MéxicoFinlandia
FranciaPaíses Bajos
EsloveniaSueciaCorea
CanadáChile
EE.UU.Promedio
PoloniaLuxemburgo
EstoniaAlemania
EspañaAustria
ItaliaTurquía
JapónRep. Checa
LetoniaEslovaquia
HungríaIndonesia
Rusia
HIGHER EDUCATION SPENDING (% Of GDP)
PRIMARY AND SECUNDARY EDUCATION SPENDING (% Of GDP)
6,1% 5,3%
OECD: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EXPENDITURE
Total expenditure on education, by funding source (Percentage of GDP)
HIGHER EDUCATION COVERAGE
GROSS COVERAGE AT HIGHER EDUCATION LEVEL (2014,%)
COVERAGE EVOLUTION IN CHILE (2014, %)
Ingreso según
ENROLMENT
2015
SELECTION PROCESS: 2015
ADMISSION
UNIVERSITIES
SELECTIVE 29,7%
101.281
NON SELECTIVE:
15,4% 52.650
PI - TSC NON SELECTIVE:
54,9% 187.000
CRITICAL ASPECTS: STUDENT PROFILE IS CRITICAL TO ENSURE ACCESS
About 50% of students of
ESTP work and study
simultaneously.
40% of ESTP students come
from municipal schools and 54%
from private schools funded.
The Common Access System does not take into account the profile of
students of vocational higher technical education, different from that of
university students
70% of students entering PI / TSC are the first in their families to access to the
higher education
CRITICAL ASPECTS: STUDENT PROFILE IS CRITICAL TO ENSURE ACCESS
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X
CRUCH/PRIVATE Ues:
Greater number of
students in the highest
quintiles.
PI/TSC:
Greater number of
students in the lowest
quintiles.
CRITICAL ASPECTS: THE TRADITIONAL ACCESS SYSTEM AFFECTS THE ACCESS OF THE MOST VULNERABLE
The positive discrimination of the PT and TSC is evident. The bias of universities towards the highest deciles is greater than 30%.
CRITICAL ASPECTS: STUDENT PROFILE IS CRITICAL TO ENSURE ACCESS
FIRST CHALLENGE…
STUDENTS OF LOWER INCOME
2 out of 10
GET ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION
9 out of 10
GET ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION
Access to higher education is not
equitable: For the poorest it is more difficult
to reach Higher Education
STUDENTS OF HIGHER INCOME
INST. OF HIGHER EDUCATION FIRST YEAR TOTAL
CRUCH (25) 72.639 304.577
PUBLIC (16) 41.740 171.384
G9 (9) 30.899 133.193
U. PRIVADAS (35) 78.015 341.391
ACCREDITED (20) 67.338 295.749
NON ACCREDITED (15) 10.677 45.642
PI+TSC 188.536 519.686
TOTAL 339.190 1.165.654
PI+TSC 56%
G9 20%
Publics 28%
Privates 52%
Universities 44%
PI+TSC
45%
G9
21%Publ ics
26%
Privates
53%
Universities
55%
ALLOCATION OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS BY IES
TOTAL ENROLMENT 2015 BY INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Students: First year Students: Total
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISATION
IES BY SOCIOECONOMIC LEVEL: (Undergraduate Enrolment 2015)
45%
40%
39%
55%
17%
15%
14%
18%
38%
45%
47%
27%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
U.Estatales
U. del G9
U.Privadas
CFT+IP
Deciles 1-5 Deciles 6-7 Deciles 8-10
ALLOCATION OF ENROLMENT BY DECILES
ALLOCATION OF ENROLLMENT, ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
CHARACTERISATION BY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
THANK YOU!!!
top related