velo-city2009 segregated cycling and shared spaces
Post on 30-May-2018
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
1/61
Shared Space & segregated cycling
in today's cities
This is a slightly modified and annotated version of the slides for the
presentation on Segregated Cycling, part of the Subplenary session on
Shared Spaces at the Velo-City conference 2009 in Brussels, Belgium.
The complete set of presentations at Velo-City 2009 can be found online here:
http://www.velo-city2009.com/programme-en/subplenaries-sessions.html
The Velo-City2009,Bruxelles MobilitandECFlogos are property of their
respective organizations. All original content Creative Commons
with attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) to
Esteban Garca (egarcia@atizza.eu).
With special thanks for their cooperation to the people in the Ciudad Ciclista
Network (http://ciudadciclista.org).
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
2/61
Culture shock
This is a view on the present cycling culture in Europe
by a cyclist who was fortunate enough to spend years getting to know his
bicycle and his city all by himself,
without any contact with that culture,
and thus without any preconceptions about what he was supposed to think.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
3/61
A paradigm shift
is on the making
in our cities.
Peak oil, congestion, pollution, obesity, deterioration of public spaces
the dominant model for our cities during the XXth century is at the end of
the rope.
A new model is already here for the cities we want, and Shared Space is justone of the signs of it.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
4/61
We are at risk ofbecoming an obstacle
to the new paradigm.
And for the first time the urban bicycle users (or rather, the bicycle
advocates) are increasingly at risk of becoming a conservative and
reactionary force acting to preserve the XXth century status-quo and against
the new city paradigm.
The crucial point of this danger is our attachment to so called cycling
facilities, and specifically to segregated cycling structures.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
5/61
Segregated cycling
The problem comes with cycling facilities which are in fact segregated
structures:
Segregation: keeping motorised traffic in streets while marking specific part of
the streets width for bicycle use alongside same direction motor traffic.
The basic device for bicycle segregation is a longitudinal divide of the way,
trying to keep different kinds of traffic in different points of its width. The
elemental implementation is a longitudinal line (solid, dotted) on the roadway,
meaning bicycles to one side of the line, motor traffic to the other side.
Various enhancements can be provided (pavement coloring, barriers, different
ground levels approaching the cycling space to the pedestrian space) without
changing the essence of the concept.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
6/61
Segregation is often confused with, but by no means the same as,
reserved spaces for bicycle traffic (non-motorised streets, counterflow
cycle-only lanes).
Segregated and reserved cycling structures are often loosely and
incorectly bundled together, but they are completely different in nature and
need to be discussed separately if the issues are to be solved.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
7/61
Cycling segregation is a structural part of the dying paradigm on western
cities.
Cycling segregation is a completelly artificial concept, and an arbitrary
decision made several decades ago in a small part of Europe for ideological
reasons in no way related to cyclists safety or comfort.
A number of societies in Europe which could not develop segregated
cycling from the beguining of the car era have chosen for decades to
believe that they needed segregation to promote cycling. The fascination
with the Dutch Model has had a devastating effect on cycling culture and
bicycle use in large parts of Europe.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
8/61
Kill the concept.
The concept of segregated cycling in post-car cities
cannot possibly work (i.e., actually increase cycling safety and comfort)
is having destructive effects in the quality of public spaces
is, however, extremely attractive and has trapped the cycling community
collective mind has thus adversely affected cyclist advocacy and even the way cyclists see
ourselves, the use we do of our bicycles and our place in our cities.
and is in fact running against the desirable evolution of our cities
in all car-saturated societies.
We need to kill the concept of segregated cycling and move on to a
cycling paradigm acording to the present and future needs.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
9/61
Arguments forsegregated structures
The common sense argument. The Dutch do them argument.
The Everybody else does them argument.
The safety argument.
The BL create cyclists argument.
The vulnerable users argument.
The novice users argument.
The visibility argument.
The transition argument.
The etc etc etc argument.
In our fascination with the Dutch Model
and under the enticing cloack of a proper space for cycling
we have build a list of ad-hoc arguments to sustain the segregation
paradigm.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
10/61
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
11/61
Come live and cycle
in sunny Spain!
(Advertising break)
Lets have a look at the segregation paradigm at work.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
12/61
Door to door bike lanes!
Engineering
Now it is possible to cycle straight out of home into the cycle lane
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
13/61
Cities designed from the ground for cycling!
Politics
Segregation as a first choice in design to the exclusion of designs that would
be possible, more modern, more realistic, and clearly safer.
Segregation as a pretext to justify bad, unsafe design.
Whole cities designed from scratch with dangerous configurations.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
14/61
Fantastic projects...
Engineering
Source:Ayunta
mientodeGuad
alajara|Guada
lajaraC
ityCou
ncil
Beautiful projects, lots of talent, time, bureaucracy and money
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
15/61
...with few details left out!
Engineering
But when you actually go to see the place, the real effects are disheartening.
but the segregation bureaucracy goes on.
(The images show how the project in the preceding page would look if
implemented. Which are going to be taken out, the elderly people or the
vegetation?)
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
16/61
Bike lanes through privilegednatural spaces!
Source:ht
tp://www.ecologistas
enaccion.org
Environment
Even emblematic natural spaces are being destroyed to serve the cycling
segregation ideology regardless of actual circumstances or needs.
(The image shows the building site of a bike path through Natural Park of
Doana in Spain, one of the most important natural reserves in Europe.
Aparently the perfectly safe, perfectly cyclable, old-fashioned path in thebackground of the photo is not good enough for cyclists, and the outcry by
conservationist and other civil groups in the area has not been enough to
stop the agression to the park commited in the name of cycling mobility.
The spanish cycling community has been notoriously absent from the
protests against this infrastructure).
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
17/61
A no-fantasies street
Lets try to have a fresh look a cyclists needs from the starting point of a
real street like the ones in which I live and work: high density, double
parking, scarce space
How can we get to fill this kind of streets with people cycling?
Shared Space seems to bring in interesting ideas
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
18/61
Shared space?
Source:Socia
te@Flickr.
But when we see a classic image purported to represent Shared Space, a
number of questions come to mind:
Where did they park all the cars?
How did they get those wide spaces?
How much money all that cost?
and it becomes clear that if this is Shared Space,
it is not something that can be readily applied
in a majority of the real streets that we have to deal with in our cities today.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
19/61
Pulse para aadir unttulo
Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGCE6vI5j68
A cyclist in Shared space!?
And then, watching a Youtube video of cyclists riding in this kind of space,
we find
A cyclist entering the roundabout much too close to the edge
then making a left turn sign
(which is strange, because one of the uses of roundabouts is precisely to
eliminate left turns)
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
20/61
Pulse para aadir unttulo
First conflict... awkward... unduly gives way...
getting in an akward position in front of a incoming car
hesitating, almost foot to the ground finally giving way to the car
(which is strange, because in a normal situation
it is the vehicle inside the roundabout the one that has the priority)
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
21/61
Pulse para aadir unttulo
Riding along on the outside...
Riding alonside that car for a few seconds
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
22/61
Second conflict... unduly takes preference...
Getting again in an akward position in front of that very same car,
which has to stop this time to give way to the cyclist
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
23/61
Pulse para aadir unttulo
Third conflict... crossing pedestrian style...
Forcing another car to stop to allow the cyclist cross the street
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
24/61
Pulse para aadir unttulo
Off we go!
Before going on her way through the wide open, flashy, expensive, shared
spaces of her city.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
25/61
Is this all
Shared Space has to offer
to cyclists?
because if it is, it is not something worth fighting for, from this cyclists
point of view.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
26/61
What is the problem?
The most strange thing is that the configuration of the roundabout and the
speed of traffic in it are so bike-friendly that it offers no difficulty for the
cyclist to ride through it in the most natural fashion
if only she wanted to.
Which brings us to the conclusion: the cyclist in the video is in fact
refusing to ride naturaly through the roundabout. She is making lifedifficult to herself and to the drivers around her because she keeps behaving
as if she were in a bike lane.
(which is in fact the case, but that is another matter).
In short: eighty years of cycling segregation have so crippled the cycling
culture in the Netherlands that cyclists are reluctant to ride naturally ineven the easiest and most friendly places.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
27/61
Empowering cyclists
Which brings us to another conclusion:
The main goal of any cycling policy in today cities must be
empowering cyclists to take back their cities streets and to regain
control of their own safety.
IfShared Space (or any other policy) is not going to bring about this
empowering of bicycle users, it is not worth pursuing.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
28/61
Fun fact #1:
Empoweringcyclists?
Cyclists' comfort has widely been used as a simple criterion for cycling
infrastructure, and as a pretext to justify cycling segregation.
Cyclists' comfort, just as cyclists' safety, has been unduly equalled with
difficulties in the road network, and thus engineering measures have
primarily been sought to increase it.
However, cyclists' comfort and safety are complex fenomena,
a function both of the physical difficulty of the space to cycle through and
of the cyclists skill.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
29/61
Empoweringcyclists?
The segregationist paradigm has made a enormous (and arguably
unsuccessful) effort over several decades to lower the physical difficulty of
the streets network for cyclists.
A direct effect of that effort has been a continuous lowering of the cycling
skills of the users needed to keep the comfort level.
Several damaging results of this process are visible in the cycling culture of
todays bicycle users throughout Europe, among others:
Cyclists who reportedly feel endangered in traffic, but who do not feel
concerned or able to follow the basic traffic discipline and rules.
Cyclists who cannot cycle confidently and naturaly in the most friendly
and easy streets and roads.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
30/61
A no-fantasies street
What does Shared Spacemean here?
Since the more visible version of the Shared Space concept doesnt seem of
much use to bicycle users, lets try to have a second look at its essentials,
strictly from a cyclists point of view,
from the kind of real streets we have to deal with:
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
31/61
XXth Century urban planning:
Adapting cities to motor traffic.
Hard to argue this
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
32/61
The ergonomic rulesof traffic
Right to driving space. Drive on the proper side. Rules for giving way. Speed positioning. Maneuver positioning.
The rock-bottom of adapting the streets to motor traffic is:
creating a uniform and simplified driving space in which drivers can behave
in simple, uniform, predictable and easy to understand and comunicate
ways.
The basic rules of traffic behavior do not need any road signalling to make
driving perfectly safe
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
33/61
Space and visibility
A perfectly safe street to drive and ride.
Urban spaces don't need a lot of traffic signs to be safe...
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
34/61
SLOW
provided that the driving goes at an appropriately slow speed.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
35/61
Source:fuenter e
bollo.com
and our forefathers new that very well.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
36/61
However, during the XXth century, traffic design has created a large array
of signaling tools
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
37/61
SPEED
The name of the game is
Fun fact #2:
almost strictly to allow faster traffic speeds while trying to maintain the
safety level.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
38/61
The signal-saturated urban trafficnetwork:
Incoherent - Contradictory.
Ineffective.
Unwanted side effects.
Fun fact #3:
The irony of this is that
many of those tools are now being questioned as being ineffective for their
intended goal.
a number of elements with opposite functions (for instance speedfacilitators and speed limitators) are increasingly present next to each other
(and countering each other) in our cities.
the whole speed-centered system of design is having unintended and
unwanted side effects.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
39/61
The speed based engineering has corrupted
the behaviour of users.
Militarisingthe streets
Maybe the most damaging unintended effect:
The signalling was intended to make things easier for pedestrians and
drivers, but instead the signalling saturation has gotten in the way of a
natural use of public spaces.
Signals have become more important than people:
for a car driver it is not any longer important whether there is a pedestrian
trying to cross the street.
What is important is whether there is a zebra crossing for the pedestrian to
claim priority.
For one century now, we have been militarising the streets
so it is not surprising if people are forgetting how to act civil in them.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
40/61
Simplicity Uniformity
Maybe the main merit of the Shared Space concept is recognising that
this signalling overload has been an arbitrary, speed-minded adition
to the basic principles of street design
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
41/61
Simplicity Uniformity
and trying to get back to those principles.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
42/61
We already have Shared space for cycling
in a vast mayority of our streets.
Fun fact #4:
Yes, we do!
If we only could convince people of it!
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
43/61
Why can't we
Convince people?
How did we come to a point in which people think that just riding a bicycle
in a normal street is suicidal?
Lets have a look at this question.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
44/61
Strangely enough, in the huge array of traffic signals created during the
XXth century, signals created to warn drivers of dangers ahead or to
regulate their behaviour in every conceivable situation, there are only two
signals meant for bicycle users:
Signal 1: Bike lane: You are obliged to ride there.
Signal 2: You are forbidden to ride there.
(there are maybe a couple more signals, but all of them are dependent on
those two)
Isnt this strange?
What does this say about the cycling culture and the cycling advocacy of
the last century?
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
45/61
Some traffic signs that do not exist...and the reason why.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
46/61
We have this sign...
We have this sign: Space shared by pedestrians and cyclists.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
47/61
But we do not have this one.
Why, in a century of traffic engineering, we have not been able to create
this sign: Space shared by bicycles and cars?
The answer: because the cycling community has decided that their space is
with the pedestrians
(where the cyclists have the upper hand)rather than with the car drivers.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
48/61
And we do not have this one either.
It is well known that pavement riding is highly dangerous why dont we
have a signal like this, prohibiting it?
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
49/61
because they would be in conflict withthe sign that we have chosen to have.
vs. because it would contradict the other one that we have chosen instead.
Prohibiting pavement riding would challenge the segregation paradigm
that the cycling community have chosen for ourselves,
and thus it has to be allowed, even if proven
dangerous,a deterioration of the street quality for pedestrians
and a continuous source of conflicts with them.
)In fact, in most places pavement cycling is forbidden, but the prohibition is
rarely enforced).
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
50/61
We have this sign,prohibiting a dangerous maneuver...
We have this sign, prohibiting lorries to ovetake cars in certain points
where it would be dangerous
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
51/61
To prevent another frequent dangerous maneuver.But we do not have this one,
And we know that for a cyclist overtaking on the right a lorry or heavy
vehicle is extremely dangerous.
Why then dont we have this sign, prohibiting it?
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
52/61
Why not?
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
53/61
vs. because it would contradict the whole conceptof cycling that we have chosen to have.
In fact, the very concept of a segregated bike lane is an incitation to wrong
side overtaking by cyclists. How is it surprising that cyclists keep doing it
when they are in a street without a segregated structure?
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
54/61
Cycling segregation has precluded thesearch for real solutions to real problems
by actual cyclists in real cities.
In short, the segregation paradigm has created an artificial mindframe
in which very real dangers to cyclists are unavoidable
And the measures to counter them are, simply put,
Unthinkable.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
55/61
We have chosen
a mind framework
acting against
the interests of cyclistsand the chances ofrecycling our cities.
Fun fact #5:
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
56/61
The cycling community,
and the cycling advocates
Have painted ourselves into a (very dangerous) corner in our cities.
An the only way to break out of it is to kill the segregation paradigm.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
57/61
Killing the concept
Old paradigm:
Segregated lanes are
part of the solution.
New paradigm:
Segregated lanes are
part of the problem.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
58/61
Killing the concept
Old paradigm:
Create bike lanes
everywhere possible.
New paradigm:
Avoid creating BL if at all
possible.
Fully develop the alternatives
to segregation.
Clearly tell people to stopexpecting any more bikelanes.
The bit about stopping creating segregated structures is the easy part.
The really hard part is acknowledging to ourselves,
and to the cicling and not cycling public,
that a radical change in attitude and route is needed
if we reeally aim to turn bicycles in the dominant vehicle in our cities.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
59/61
We cyclists have been for 80 years trying to create our own space and own
rules.
Shared space, in cycling, in today's cities, means sharing space AND
RULES with cars.
And that means stopping lobbing for space and rules, and start lobbing for
space and rules that we can share.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
60/61
What do we want?
... Cycling facilities?
or
... Cycling cities?
Because Cycling facilietes and cycling cities are by no means the
same.
An the the inmediate future, and in the new paradigm for our livable cities,
both may in fact be quite opposite and incompatible.
-
8/14/2019 Velo-city2009 Segregated Cycling and Shared Spaces
61/61
Shared space for cycling:
top related