using risk-issue-opportunity management to shape your acquisition

Post on 13-Feb-2017

217 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Using Risk / Issue / Opportunity Management to Shape Your Acquisition

Breakout Session #: F06

Matt Wilson, Larry Floyd, Lyle Eesley, Phil Salmeri

Date: Tuesday, July 26

Time: 4:00pm–5:15pm

2

Objective / Format

• Objective • Discuss Risk / Issue / Opportunity (RIO)

handling related to the Acquisition process and related artifacts

• Format • Basic RIO Model overview • Provide examples from SMEs • Provide a forum for discussion • Learn from one another

3

Risk / Issue / Opportunity (RIO)

• What are we talking about? •Risk • Issue •Opportunity

4

Options to respond to risk

• Responses • Assessment • Handling

•Mitigation •Avoidance •Acceptance • Ignore

• Monitor / Track / Manage

5

Risk Assessment • Risk Identification

• What is the RIO •Describe it in a statement •What category does it fall into?

• What is its likelihood •How probable is this to happen

• What is its impact •What is the consequence if this RIO comes to pass?

6

Risk Assessment Model Nearly Certain

Highly Likely

Likely

Unlikely

Remote

Likelihood Impact

Minimal / None Somewhat Moderate Major Un-

acceptable

Likelihood / Probability Likelihood Rating Description 5 Nearly Certain The event is expected to occur in most

circumstances as there is a history of regular occurrence on this type of project.

4 Highly Likely There is a strong possibility the event will occur as there is a history of frequent occurrence on this type of project.

3 Likely The event might occur at some time as there is a history of casual occurrence on this type of project.

2 Unlikely Not expected, but there's a slight possibility it may occur at some time.

1 Remote Highly unlikely, but it may occur in exceptional circumstances. It could happen, but probably never will.

7

Impact / Consequence • Set impact levels based on

the category of the risk – Cost – Schedule – Performance (Technical)

8

Cost Impact

Impact Rating Description 5 Unacceptable

> 15% or > $350K

4 Major 10-15% or $200K – $350K 3 Moderate 5-10% or $100K – $200K 2 Somewhat 1-5% or $20K – $100K 1 Minimal /

None < 1% or < $20K

9

Scale based on the size of the project and/or its tolerance for variation. For example: Project budget of $2M

Schedule Impact

10

Impact Rating Description 5 Unacceptable > 12 weeks schedule impact 4 Major 8-12 weeks schedule impact 3 Moderate 4-8 weeks schedule impact 2 Somewhat 1-4 weeks schedule impact 1 Minimal / None < 1 week schedule impact

Scale based on the duration of the project and/or its tolerance for variation. For example: Project duration of 1 Year

Performance Impact • Examples base it on Key Performance

Parameters (KPPs)

– Impact on mission performance – Website availability – Facility Access – Ability to handle calls

11

Performance Impact

12

Impact Rating Description 5 Unacceptable Catastrophic impact on the product /service.

No credible work-around exists. 4 Major Significant impact on the product / service.

Work arounds require considerable effort. 3 Moderate Noticeable impact on the product / service.

Work arounds require effort. 2 Somewhat Minor impact on the product / service.

Work arounds are not cumbersome. 1 Minimal /

None Almost no impact on the functional quality of the product / service.

This is the trickiest one and may require multiple scales and sub-categories to properly quantify. Often subjective. Example: Achieve technical objectives

13

Risk Assessment Model Nearly Certain

Highly Likely C

Likely

Unlikely A B

Remote

Likelihood Impact

Minimal / None Somewhat Moderate Major Un-

acceptable

Acquisition Risks

14

Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational Alignment

Funding Consistency

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business Allocation

Protest

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection Evaluation Factors

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

15

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Acquisition Risks

16

Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational Alignment

Funding Consistency

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business Allocation

Protest

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection Evaluation Factors

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Other Other

Impacts on Acquisition

17

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

18

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

19

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

20

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

21

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

22

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Impacts on Acquisition

23

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

24

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Impacts on Acquisition

25

Requirement (PWS, SOW, SOO)

Contract Type and Structure

Performance Standards

Technical Evaluation Plan / Team

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

Cost Estimate

Acquisition Team Composition

Source Selection & Evaluation Factors

Areas of Opportunity / Mitigation Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational / Political

Funding

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Stability

Business / Programmatic

Protest

Other

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

Acquisition Risks

26

Schedule Constraints

Technical Challenges

Organizational Alignment

Funding Consistency

Stakeholder Expectations

Technological Instability

Business Allocation

Protest

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Address your highest Risks (ignore the green ones)

Risk / Issue / Opportunity Category

What now? • Identify RIOs • Categorize RIO

Assess Probability / Impact – Only focus on higher risks

• Handle Risks – Intentionally impact acquisition

• Where is the best place to address each item

– Track / Resolve

27

28

• Matt Wilson – SimVentions – mwilson@simventions.com (540) 372-7727

• Larry Floyd – DAU – lawrence.floyd@dau.mil (703) 805-4876

• Lyle Eesley – SME – lyle.eesley@gmail.com (757) 232-0664

• Phil Salmeri – SME – pesalmeri@gmail.com (540) 735-4048

Contact Information

Follow-up discussion here are World Congress at SimVentions Booth 519

top related