using birds to guide post-fire management in the plumas & lassen national forests ryan d....

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Using Birds to Guide Post-fire Management in the Plumas & Lassen National Forests

Ryan D. Burnett, Nathaniel Seavy, and Diana Humple

4/21/2011

PRBO Conservation Science

Study Objectives

• Assess the influence of post-fire conditions on spatial and temporal variation in landbird populations

- diversity and abundance of a suite of landbird species

- woodpecker cavity use

- linking avian metrics with habitat conditions at multiple

spatial scales

• Inform forest management decisions to promote diverse and resilient forest ecosystems across multiple spatial scales

PRBO Conservation Science

Study Sites

PRBO Conservation Science

Fire Age, Size, Patch Size, and Severity Varies

Cub ~15,000 acres – Summer 2008

12% High Severity

Moonlight ~ 66,000 acres

Summer 2007

56.5% high severityStorrie ~”52,000” acres – Fall 2000

28% high severity

PRBO Conservation Science

Site Selection

• Random Stratified sample (public

land, slope<40 percent, 1km from road or trail,

1500m between starting points)

• Sample size per fire based on accessible area

• 17 Storrie Fire Transects (4 private)

• 32 Moonlight Fire Transects (6 private)

• 13 Cub Fire Transects (0 private)

PRBO Conservation Science

Sampling Transect

Five exact distance point count surveys per transect

2-4 hour cavity nest search of 20ha plot

PRBO Conservation Science

Habitat Surveys

• 50m radius vegetation surveys at each point count station

• 11.3m radius snag plot at each nest, point count station, and 5 random locations – DBH, decay class, tree

species, scorch height, etc.

• Classified Severity Using Composite Burn Index

Point Count Stations & Random Snag Plot - example

PRBO Conservation Science

Storrie Greatest Diversity and Abundance

PRBO Conservation Science

Riparian Areas Serve as Refugia on Private Land

Species Richness Total Bird Abundance0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Private Land Upland vs. Riparian Sites

Riparian

Upland

# p

er p

oin

t co

un

t st

atio

n

PRBO Conservation Science

Avian Abundance Varies by Severity & Fire

<0.1 0.1 - 0.5 0.5 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.5 1.5 - 2 2.0 - 2.5 2.5 - 30

1

2

3

4

5

6

Storrie Total Bird Abundance

Burn Severity (Composite Burn Index)

Det

ecti

on

s/P

oin

t C

ou

nt

Vis

it

<.1 .1 - 0.5 .51 - 1.0 1.01 - 1.5

1.51 - 2 2.01 - 2.5

2.5 - 30

1

2

3

4

5

6

Moonlight Total Bird Abundance

Burn Severity (Composite Burn Index)

Det

ecti

on

s/P

oin

t C

ou

nt

Vis

it

<.1 .1 - 0.5 .51 - 1.0 1.01 - 1.5

1.51 - 2 2.01 - 2.5

2.5 - 30

1

2

3

4

5

Cub Total Bird Abundance

Burn Severity (Composite Burn Index)

Det

ecti

on

s/P

oin

t C

ou

nt

Vis

it

PRBO Conservation Science

Nest Tree Size Varies by Woodpecker Species

PRBO Conservation Science

Most Species Select for Broken Tops

PRBO Conservation Science

All Species Selecting for Dead & Decaying Trees

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

PRBO Conservation Science

Black-backed Woodpecker Nest Sites = High Snag Densities ~277/ha (111/acre)

Po

rpo

rtio

n (

+/-

CI )

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Black-backed Woodpecker

All nests (N = 19, p < 0.001)Cub nests (N = 10, p < 0.001)Moonlight nests (N = 9, p = 0.006)Available (N = 247,114,133)

Se

lect

ion

ra

tios

(+/-

CI )

0

1

2

3

4

5

< 4 snags per plot 4-8 snags per plot > 8 snags per plot

PRBO Conservation Science

Black-backed Woodpecker Use = Very High Snag Densities beyond the micro-nest site

Mean Snag Density across 20ha plots with BBWO Nests

Mean Snag Density within 11.3m of BBWO nests

PRBO Conservation Science

Post-fire habitat is Unique & Heterogeneous

PRBO Conservation Science

Early Successional - Disturbance Dependent Species left out in the rain

Regression Coefficient

← Decrease in Owl Habitat Increase in Owl Habitat →

PRBO Conservation Science

Early Seral & Habitat Mosaics

R2=0.21, p<0.0001

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

% Shrub/Brush within a 500m radius

Fo

x S

pa

rro

w A

bu

nd

an

ce

(p

red

icte

d)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Edge Density within a 1000m radius (Contrast Weighted m/ha)

Oliv

e-s

ide

d F

lyc

atc

he

r A

bu

nd

an

ce

(p

red

icte

d)

PRBO Conservation Science

Conclusions

• Post-fire habitat – including areas that burned at high severity

– are an important component of the ecosystem necessary for

maintaining biological diversity in the Sierra Nevada

• Time since fire & fire severity both appear to influence avian

community

• Post-fire salvaged areas on private land support significantly

less diverse and abundant avian community

• Existing snags on the landscape (prior to fire) are important

resource for cavity nesting birds the first 3 to 5 years post-fire

• Black-backed Woodpecker are nesting in areas with very high

snag densities (100 – 300 per acre)

PRBO Conservation Science

Future Direction

• Temporal & spatial effects of fire severity on bird diversity, abundance, and cavity use

• Spatially explicit habitat suitability models to help guide future post-fire management

• Compare bird assemblages between green forest and post-fire habitat with and without treatments

PRBO Conservation Science

Bird Response to Commercial DFPZ Harvest

• 122 points treated with DFPZs (only) 2005 – 2009

• Lassen and Plumas National Forests

• 122 reference points selected using cladogram to determine most appropriate reference for each treated sites

PRBO Conservation Science

Cladogram to Select Reference Sites

PRBO Conservation Science

Analysis

• Dependent variables: abundance of 15 focal species, total bird abundance, & species richness

• Data from 2004-2010• Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with Poisson

distributions • Controlled for random effects (point, year, transect)

• Compared:-reference to pre-treatment-year-since-treatment to reference sites-year-since-treatment to pre-treatment sites

 

PRBO Conservation Science

Preliminary Results

PRBO Conservation Science

Four main uses of the website:

1) view project results through

‘packaged’ analyses

2) view study locations and

presence/absence on a map

3) download raw data (survey

results and locations)

4) Access reports, publications, and

other literature

Sierra Nevada Avian Monitoring Information Network

PRBO Conservation Science

Thank You!

Plumas & Lassen National Forests

H.F. Quincy Library Group Monitoring Program

PSW SNRC – Peter Stine

Resources Legacy Fund

Field Crew:

Paul Taillie, Mel Preston, Tiffany Russell, Brendan McGarry, Jason St. Pierre, Meghan Horne-Brine, Alicia Arcidiacono, Simone Cook, Joe Michael, Doug Zimmerman

top related