use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and bluegrass seed straw in wintering beef cow feeding regimes...
Post on 02-Jan-2016
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Use of Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzymes and Bluegrass Seed Straw in Wintering Beef Cow Feeding Regimes
J.I. Szasz†, C.W. Hunt†, K.A. Johnson‡, J.J. Michal‡, and D.J. Coonrad‡†University of Idaho and ‡Washington State University
Research ObjectiveTo examine the impact of ammoniation and exogenous fibrolytic enzyme on performance of cows fed bluegrass
straw diets.
Introduction
Open-field burning of crop aftermath has been a critically important management practice for grass seed production. This practice serves numerous agronomic benefits and provides for sustained (>10 yr) seed production from perennial grass fields. Environmental and health concerns have resulted in legislation that restrict the burning of crop residues in many portions of
the Northwest. As a result, bluegrass straw has become a readily available forage source for livestock producers. However, high fiber content characteristic of straws requires that methods be implemented that improve its feeding value. Research has indicated that exogenous fibrolytic enzymes may increase fiber digestibility (Beauchemin et al., 1995 and Feng et al., 1996). By improving fiber digestibility, fibrolytic enzymes may have a practical application in feeding systems that utilize bluegrass straw.
Implications Addition of enzymes was not beneficial indicating that optimal fiber digestion was achieved by ruminal microorganisms without the complement of exogenous enzymes
Bluegrass straw proved to be an acceptable component of wintering beef cow rations; however the benefit achieved from ammoniation did not justify its replacement value of alfalfa hay ($19.80 cost of ammoniation per MT of straw versus $104.50 cost per MT of alfalfa hay).
Home of “Idaho Gem” Home of “Idaho Gem”
Materials and Methods
Completely randomized block design using 89 Angus crossbred beef cows (mean initial BW 636 kg; blocked by days-to-parturition) Dietary treatments consisted of alfalfa in combination with:
Enzyme application method:
Non-ammoniated bluegrass straw Ammoniated bluegrass straw Non-ammoniated bluegrass straw with enzyme Ammoniated bluegrass straw with enzyme
Contained xylanase and cellulase activity 676 mol reducing sugars/g CP/min (20.9% CP)
Enzyme was administered to straw by hand-spraying freshly prepared enzyme solution onto straw at a rate
of 0.22 g enzyme (4.4 IU xylanase)/kg
Alfalfa was offered at a rate of 6.3 and 4.6 kg/hd/d for non-ammoniated and ammoniated straw treatments, respectively
Bluegrass was offered ad libitum and intake was recorded daily
Fibrolytic enzyme:
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Calf
wei
ght,
Kg
45 days 205 days
Calf Age
Eff ect of ammoniation and enzyme on calf weight
Non-Ammonia
Ammonia
No Enzyme
Enzyme
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
Cow
Body
Con
diti
on S
core
(1-
9)
2 45
Days Post- partum
Eff ect of ammoniation and enzyme on cow body condition
Non-Ammonia
Ammonia
No Enzyme
Enzyme
P=.09
No differences were observed for reproductive performance:
•Pregnancy rate at 30 and 60 days of the breeding season.•Services per conception•Percent cows open
With the general absence of treatment differences for calf weight, cow BCS, and reproduction, we conclude that:
•Exogenous fibrolytic enzymes were not beneficial
•Ammoniation of bluegrass straw was effective in reducing dependence on more expensive alfalfa hay as a component of a winter feed ingredient for late gestation and early post-partum beef cows.
top related