tyrrell, j., richmond, r. c., palmer, t. m., feenstra, b...

Post on 22-Oct-2019

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Tyrrell, J., Richmond, R. C., Palmer, T. M., Feenstra, B., Rangarajan, J.,Metrusky, S., ... Freathy, R. M. (2016). Genetic Evidence for CausalRelationships Between Maternal Obesity-Related Traits and Birth Weight.JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(11), 1129-1140.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.1975

Peer reviewed version

Link to published version (if available):10.1001/jama.2016.1975

Link to publication record in Explore Bristol ResearchPDF-document

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol ResearchGeneral rights

This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the publishedversion using the reference above. Full terms of use are available:http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms

1

Dateofrevision:11February2016

Wordcount(text):3837

Geneticevidenceforcausalrelationshipsbetweenmaternalobesity-related

traitsandbirthweight

JessicaTyrrell,PhD1,2;RebeccaC.Richmond,PhD3,4,12;TomM.Palmer,PhD5,6*;BjarkeFeenstra,

PhD7;JananiRangarajan,MS8;SarahMetrustry,MSc9;AlanaCavadino,MSc10,11;LaviniaPaternoster,

PhD12;LorenL.Armstrong,PhD13;N.ManekaG.DeSilva,PhD12;AndrewR.Wood,PhD1;Momoko

Horikoshi,MD,PhD14,15;FrankGeller,MSc7;RonnyMyhre,PhD16;JonathanP.Bradfield,BS17;Eskil

Kreiner-Møller,MD18;VilleHuikari,MSc19;JodieN.Painter,PhD20;Jouke-JanHottenga,PhD21,22;

CatherineAllard,BSc23,24;DianeJ.Berry,PhD11;LuigiBouchard,PhD,MBA24-26;ShiktaDas,PhD27;

DavidM.Evans,PhD3,12,28;HakonHakonarson,MD,PhD17,29,30;M.GeoffreyHayes,PhD13;Jani

Heikkinen,MSc31;AlbertHofman,PhD32;BridgetKnight,PhD1;PenelopeA.Lind,PhD20;MarkI.

McCarthy,MD,PhD14,15,33;GeorgeMcMahon,PhD3;SarahE.Medland,PhD20;MadsMelbyeMD,

DMSc7,34;AndrewP.Morris,PhD15,35;MichaelNodzenski,MS8;ChristophReichetzeder,MD36,37;

SusanM.Ring,PhD3,12;SylvainSebert,PhD19,38;VerenaSengpiel,PhD39;ThorkildI.A.Sørensen,

MD12,40,41;GonnekeWillemsen,PhD21,22;EcoJ.C.deGeus,PhD21,22;NicholasG.Martin,PhD20;Tim

D.Spector,MD9;ChristinePower,PhD11;Marjo-RiittaJärvelin,MD,PhD19,38,42-44;HansBisgaard,MD,

DMSci18;StruanF.A.Grant,PhD17,29,30;EllenA.Nohr,PhD45;VincentW.Jaddoe,PhD4,32,46;Bo

Jacobsson,MD,PhD16,39;JeffreyC.Murray,MD47;BertholdHocher,MD,PhD36,48;AndrewT.

Hattersley,DM1;DeniseM.Scholtens,PhD8;GeorgeDaveySmith,DSc3,12;Marie-FranceHivert,

MD49-51;JanineF.Felix,PhD4,32,46;ElinaHyppönen,PhD11,52,53;WilliamL.Lowe,Jr.,MD13;TimothyM.

Frayling,PhD1*;DebbieA.Lawlor,PhD3,12*;andRachelM.Freathy,PhD1,12*fortheEarlyGrowth

Genetics(EGG)Consortium

1. InstituteofBiomedicalandClinicalScience,UniversityofExeterMedicalSchool,RoyalDevonand

ExeterHospital,BarrackRoad,Exeter,EX25DW,UK.2. EuropeanCentreforEnvironmentandHumanHealth,UniversityofExeter,TheKnowledgeSpa,

Truro,TR13HD.3. SchoolofSocialandCommunityMedicine,UniversityofBristol,OakfieldHouse,OakfieldGrove,

Bristol,BS82BN,UK.4. TheGenerationRStudyGroup,ErasmusMC,UniversityMedicalCenterRotterdam,P.O.Box2040,

3000CA,Rotterdam,theNetherlands.5. DivisionofHealthSciences,WarwickMedicalSchool,UniversityofWarwick,Coventry,UK.6. DepartmentofMathematicsandStatistics,LancasterUniversity,Lancaster,UK.7. DepartmentofEpidemiologyResearch,StatensSerumInstitut,Copenhagen,Denmark.

2

8. DepartmentofPreventiveMedicine,NorthwesternUniversityFeinbergSchoolofMedicine.9. DepartmentofTwinResearch,King'sCollegeLondon,St.Thomas'Hospital,London,UK.10. CentreforEnvironmentalandPreventiveMedicine,WolfsonInstituteofPreventiveMedicine,

BartsandtheLondonSchoolofMedicineandDentistry,QueenMaryUniversityofLondon.11. Population,PolicyandPractice,UCLInstituteofChildHealth,UniversityCollegeLondon,UK.12. MedicalResearchCouncilIntegrativeEpidemiologyUnitattheUniversityofBristol,UK.13. DivisionofEndocrinology,MetabolismandMolecularMedicine,NorthwesternUniversity

FeinbergSchoolofMedicine14. OxfordCentreforDiabetes,EndocrinologyandMetabolism,UniversityofOxford,UK.15. WellcomeTrustCentreforHumanGenetics,UniversityofOxford,Oxford,UK.16. DepartmentofGenesandEnvironment,DivisionofEpidemiology,NorwegianInstituteofPublic

Health,Oslo,Norway.17. CenterforAppliedGenomics,TheChildren’sHospitalofPhiladelphia,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,

USA.18. CopenhagenProspectiveStudiesonAsthmainChildhood(COPSAC),FacultyofHealthSciences,

UniversityofCopenhagen,Copenhagen,Denmark&DanishPediatricAsthmaCenter,CopenhagenUniversityHospital,Gentofte,Denmark.

19. InstituteofHealthSciences,UniversityofOulu,Oulu,Finland20. QIMRBerghoferMedicalResearchInstitute,LockedBag2000,RoyalBrisbaneHospital,Herston,

Qld4029,Australia.21. EMGOInstituteforHealthandCareResearch,VUUniversityMedicalCenter,Amsterdam,The

Netherlands.22. DepartmentofBiologicalPsychology,VUUniversityAmsterdam,VanderBoechorststraat1,1081

BTAmsterdam,TheNetherlands.23. DepartmentofMathematics,UniversitedeSherbrooke,QC,Canada.24. CentrederechercheduCentreHospitalierUniversitairedeSherbrooke,Sherbrooke,QC,Canada.25. ECOGENE-21andLipidClinic,ChicoutimiHospital,Saguenay,QC,Canada.26. DepartmentofBiochemistry,UniversitédeSherbrooke,Sherbrooke,QC,Canada.27. DepartmentofPrimaryCareandPublicHealth,ImperialCollegeLondon.28. UniversityofQueenslandDiamantinaInstitute,TranslationalResearchInstitute,Brisbane,

Queensland,Australia.29. DivisionofHumanGenetics,TheChildren’sHospitalofPhiladelphia,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,

USA.30. DepartmentofPediatrics,PerelmanSchoolofMedicine,UniversityofPennsylvania,Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania,USA.31. FIMMInstituteforMolecularMedicineFinland,HelsinkiUniversityHelsinki,FI-00014,Finland.32. DepartmentofEpidemiology,ErasmusMC,UniversityMedicalCenterRotterdam,P.O.Box2040,

3000CA,Rotterdam,theNetherlands.33. OxfordNationalInstituteforHealthResearch(NIHR)BiomedicalResearchCentre,Churchill

Hospital,Oxford,UK.34. DepartmentofMedicine,StanfordUniversitySchoolofMedicine,Stanford,California,USA.35. DepartmentofBiostatistics,UniversityofLiverpool,LiverpoolL693GA,UK.36. InstituteofNutritionalScience,UniversityofPotsdam,Germany37. CenterforCardiovascularResearch/Charité,Berlin,Germany.38. DepartmentofEpidemiologyandBiostatistics,SchoolofPublicHealth,MedicalResearch

Council-HealthProtectionAgencyCentreforEnvironmentandHealth,FacultyofMedicine,ImperialCollegeLondon,UK

39. DepartmentofObstetricsandGynecology,SahlgrenskaAcademy,SahgrenskaUniversityHospital,Gothenburg,Sweden.

40. InstituteofPreventiveMedicine,BispebjergandFrederiksbergUniversityHospital,CapitalRegion,Copenhagen,Denmark

41. NovoNordiskFoundationCenterforBasicMetabolicResearchandDepartmentofPublicHealth,FacultyofHealthandMedicalSciences,UniversityofCopenhagen,Copenhagen,Denmark

42. DepartmentofChildrenandYoungPeopleandFamilies,NationalInstituteforHealthandWelfare,Aapistie1,Box310,FI-90101Oulu,Finland.

43. BiocenterOulu,UniversityofOulu,Oulu,Finland.

3

44. UnitofPrimaryCare,OuluUniversityHospital,Kajaanintie50,P.O.Box20,FI-90220Oulu,90029OYS,Finland.

45. ResearchUnitofObstetrics&Gynecology,InstituteofClinicalResearch,UniversityofSouthernDenmark,Odense,Denmark.

46. DepartmentofPediatrics,ErasmusMC,UniversityMedicalCenterRotterdam,P.O.Box2040,3000CA,Rotterdam,theNetherlands.

47. DepartmentofPediatrics,UniversityofIowa,IowaCity,Iowa,USA.48. TheFirstAffiliatedHospitalofJinanUniversity,Guangzhou,510630,China.49. DepartmentofPopulationMedicine,HarvardPilgrimHealthCareInstitute,HarvardMedical

School,Boston,MA.50. DiabetesCenter,MassachussettsGeneralHospital,Boston,MA.51. DepartmentofMedicine,UniversitedeSherbrooke,QC,Canada.52. CentreforPopulationHealthResearch,SchoolofHealthSciences,andSansomInstitute,

UniversityofSouthAustralia,Adelaide,Australia.53. SouthAustralianHealthandMedicalResearchInstitute,Adelaide,Australia.

*Theseauthorsjointlydirectedthiswork

Correspondingauthors:Dr.RachelM.FreathyUniversityofExeterMedicalSchoolRoyalDevonandExeterHospitalBarrackRoadExeter,UKTel:+44(0)1392408238Email:r.freathy@ex.ac.ukProf.DebbieA.LawlorMRCIntegrativeEpidemiologyUnitattheUniversityofBristolOakfieldHouse,OakfieldRoad,Bristol,UKTel:+44(0)1173310096Email:d.a.lawlor@bristol.ac.ukProf.TimothyM.FraylingUniversityofExeterMedicalSchoolRoyalDevonandExeterHospitalBarrackRoadExeter,UKTel:+44(0)1392408256Email:t.m.frayling@ex.ac.uk

4

Structuredabstract

Importance:Neonatesborntooverweight/obesewomenarelargerandathigherriskofbirth

complications.Manymaternalobesity-relatedtraitsareobservationallyassociatedwithbirth

weight,butthecausalnatureoftheseassociationsisuncertain.

Objective:Totestforgeneticevidenceofcausalassociationsofmaternalbodymassindex(BMI)and

relatedtraitswithbirthweight.

Design,SettingandParticipants:WeusedMendelianrandomizationtotestwhethermaternalBMI

andobesity-relatedtraitsarecausallyrelatedtooffspringbirthweight.Mendelianrandomization

makesuseofthefactthatgenotypesarerandomlydeterminedatconceptionandarethusnot

confoundedbynon-geneticfactors.Datawereanalysedon30,487womenfrom18studies.

ParticipantswereofEuropeanancestryfrompopulation-orcommunity-basedstudieslocatedin

Europe,NorthAmericaorAustraliaandparticipatingintheEarlyGrowthGenetics(EGG)

Consortium.Live,term,singletonoffspringbornbetween1929and2013wereincluded.Wetested

associationsbetweenageneticscoreof30BMI-associatedsinglenucleotidepolymorphisms(SNPs)

and(i)maternalBMIand(ii)birthweight,toestimatethecausalrelationshipbetweenBMIandbirth

weight.Analyseswererepeatedforotherobesity-relatedtraits.

Exposures:GeneticscoresforBMI,fastingglucoselevel,type2diabetes,systolicbloodpressure

(SBP),triglyceridelevel,HDL-cholesterollevel,vitaminDstatusandadiponectinlevel.

MainOutcome(s)andMeasure(s):Offspringbirthweightmeasuredbytrainedstudypersonnel(n=2

studies),frommedicalrecords(n=10studies)orfrommaternalreport(n=6studies).

Results:Amongthe30,487newbornsthemeanbirthweightinthevariouscohortsrangedfrom

3325gto3679g.ThegeneticscoreforBMIwasassociatedwitha2g(95%CI:0,3g)higheroffspring

birthweightpermaternalBMI-raisingallele(P=0.008).Thematernalgeneticscoresforfasting

glucoseandSBPwerealsoassociatedwithbirthweightwitheffectsizesof8g(95%CI:6,10g)per

5

glucose-raisingallele(P=7x10-14)and-4g(95%CI:-6,-2g)perSBP-raisingallele(P=1x10-5),

respectively.A1standarddeviation(1SD≈4kg/m2)geneticallyhighermaternalBMIwasassociated

witha55g(95%CI:17,93g)higherbirthweight.A1-SDgeneticallyhighermaternalfastingglucose

(≈0.4mmol/L)orSBP(10mmHg)wereassociatedwitha114g(95%CI:80,147g)higheror-208g(95%

CI:-394,-21g)lowerbirthweight,respectively.ForBMIandfastingglucosethesegenetic

associationswereconsistentwiththeobservationalassociations,butforSBP,thegeneticand

observationalassociationswereinoppositedirections.

ConclusionsandRelevance:InthisMendelianrandomizationstudyofmorethan30,000women

withsingletonoffspringfrom18studies,geneticallyelevatedmaternalBMIandbloodglucoselevels

werepotentiallycausallyassociatedwithhigheroffspringbirthweight,whereasgeneticallyelevated

maternalsystolicbloodpressurewasshowntobepotentiallycausallyrelatedtolowerbirthweight.

Ifreplicated,thesefindingsmayhaveimplicationsforcounselingandmanagingpregnanciestoavoid

adverseweight-relatedbirthoutcomes.

6

Introduction

Neonatesborntooverweightorobesewomenaremorelikelytobelargeforgestationalage.1The

precisemechanismsunderlyingthisassociationandtheextenttowhichconfoundingfactors

contributearepoorlyunderstood.Itisimportanttounderstandwhichmaternaltraitsarecausally

associatedwithbirthweightbecausethismay(i)facilitatetargeteddevelopmentofinterventionsto

betestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials,and(ii)enableclear,evidence-basedrecommendationsin

pregnancy.

Maternaloverweightandobesityarekeyriskfactorsforgestationaldiabetes.2Evenintheabsence

ofdiabetes,obesewomenhavehigherglucoselevelsthannormalweightwomen,despitea

controlleddiet.3Theassociationbetweengestationaldiabetesandhigherbirthweightiswell

documented4,andmaternalglucoselevelsbelowthosediagnosticofdiabetesalsoshowstrong

associationswithbirthweight.5

Thefetusofanoverweightorobesewomanmaybeexposedtotheconsequencesofhigher

maternaltriglyceridelevelsandbloodpressure,lowerlevelsofHDL-cholesterol(HDLc)and

adiponectinandlowervitaminDstatus1,6,7(Box1).Thesematernalobesity-relatedtraitshavebeen

variablyassociatedwithbirthweightinobservationalstudies:highertriglyceridesandlowerHDLc

withhigherbirthweight8,9;higherbloodpressurewithlowerbirthweight10;lowervitaminDstatus

withlowerbirthweight11;andloweradiponectinwithhigherbirthweight12.However,associations

arenotalwaysconsistentlyobservedandmaybeconfounded,forexamplebymaternal

socioeconomicstatusandassociatedbehaviourssuchassmokinganddiet.Furthermore,thehigh

inter-correlationofobesity-relatedtraitscomplicatesdeterminationofcausalrelationshipsinan

observationalsetting.

7

MaternalgenotypesmaybeusedinaMendelianrandomization13,14approachtoprovideevidenceof

apotentialcausalassociationbetweenmaternaltraitsandbirthoutcomes(Figure1).Mendelian

randomizationisanalogoustoarandomizedcontrolledtrial:genotypes,whicharerandomly

allocatedatconception,arelargelyfreefromconfoundingandcanbeusedtoestimatethepossible

causaleffectsofmaternaltraits.Inthisstudy,geneticvariantswereselectedtocalculategenetic

scoresrepresentingmaternalBMIandeachof7obesity-relatedmaternaltraits.Thepotentialcausal

relationshipbetweenmaternalBMIandeachrelatedtraitwasestimatedbytestingassociations

betweenmaternalgeneticriskscoresandoffspringbirthweights.

8

Methods

Studyparticipants

Singlenucleotidepolymorphism(SNP)genotypedatawereusedfromatotalof30,487womenfrom

18population-orcommunity-basedstudieslocatedinEurope,NorthAmericaorAustralia.Thebirth

weightofonechildpermotherwasincluded(seeeTable1forfulldetailsofparticipant

characteristicsandeTable2forgenotypinginformation).Birthweightwasmeasuredbytrained

studypersonnel(n=2studies),frommedicalrecords(n=10studies)orfrommaternalreport(n=6

studies).Theoffspringyearsofbirthwerefrom1929to2013.Multiplebirths,stillbirths,congenital

anomalies,birthsbefore37weeksgestationandindividualsofnon-Europeanancestrywere

excluded.Informedconsentwasobtainedfromallparticipants,andstudyprotocolswereapproved

bythelocalregionalorinstitutionalethicscommittees.

Selectionofmaternalobesity-relatedtraitsandSNPs

InadditiontoBMI,traitswereselectedthatareassociatedwithmaternalobesityandmayaffect

fetalgrowththroughtheintrauterineenvironment.Theireffectsweremodelledinthedirections

hypothesisedbytheirrelationshipstomaternalBMI(Box1)

SNPsknowntoberobustlyassociated(P<5x10-8)withBMIandeachobesity-relatedtraitwere

selected.FulldetailsoftheselectedSNPsareprovidedineTable3.SNPsassociatedwith(i)fasting

glucoseand(ii)type2diabeteswereusedtorepresentmaternalglycemia.TheType2diabetesSNPs

wereconsideredtorepresentexposuretomaternaldiabetesinpregnancy,includinggestational

diabetes,givenoverlapbetweentype2andgestationaldiabetesgeneticsusceptibilityvariants.15For

bloodpressure,SNPswereselectedthatareprimarilyassociatedwithsystolicbloodpressure(SBP),

thoughallalsoshowstrongevidenceofassociationwithdiastolicbloodpressure.ForvitaminD

status,twoSNPswithhypothesisedrolesinvitaminDsynthesiswereusedtorepresent25(OH)D

9

levels(anindicatorofoverallvitaminDstatus),aspreviouslyrecommended.16,17Furtherdetailsof

SNPselectionareprovidedintheeMethods.

Aweightedgeneticscorewascalculatedforeachmaternaltrait(seeeMethodsforfulldetails).Very

fewoftheselectedSNPshavebeentestedinpregnancy.Geneticscoreswerevalidatedby

confirmingthateachwasassociatedwithitsrespectivematernaltrait,measuredduringpregnancy

(withtheexceptionofBMI,forwhichthepre-pregnancyvaluewasused).Maternalpre-pregnancy

BMIwasavailablefromregistrydata(N=2studies)orcalculatedfromself-reportedweightand

height(N=3studies).IntheAvonLongitudinalStudyofParentsandChildren(ALSPAC)study,the

self-reportwasvalidatedwithaclinicmeasure18.Detailsoftraitsmeasuredinpregnancyandtheir

sourcesaregivenineTable4.Ineachavailablestudy,linearregressionofthematernaltrait(e.g.

BMI)againstthegeneticscorewasperformed,adjustingformaternalage.Toconfirmthat

associationsbetweeneachgeneticscoreanditsrespectivematernaltraitweresimilarinthesame

individualsduringandafterpregnancy,availabledatawereusedfromtwolongitudinalstudies(the

AvonLongitudinalStudyofParentsandChildren[ALSPAC]andtheExeterFamilyStudyofChildhood

Health[EFSOCH]).TocheckthatthestrategyforSNPselectionhadresultedingeneticscoresthat

werespecifictoeachmaternaltrait,theassociationwastestedbetweeneachofthe8geneticscores

andtheothermaternaltraits,andindicatorsofmaternalsocio-economicstatusandsmoking.

TestingthehypothesisthatmaternalBMIandobesity-relatedtraitsareassociatedwithbirth

weightthroughtheintra-uterineenvironment.

ForBMIandeachrelatedmaternaltrait,twoMendelianrandomizationapproacheswereusedto

testthehypothesis.First,associationsweretestedbetweengeneticscoresrepresentingmaternal

traitsandoffspringbirthweightusingthemaximumnumberofparticipants(i.e.foreachtrait,those

withgeneticscoreandoffspringbirthweightdataavailable,irrespectiveofwhethertheyhadthe

maternaltraitmeasured).Anassociationofthegeneticscorewithbirthweightwouldsupporta

10

possiblecausalrelationshipbetweenthetrait(e.g.pre-pregnancyBMI)andbirthweight,butwould

notprovideinformationonthesizeofthatassociation.Second,weperformedanalysesinthosewith

themeasuredtraitthatenabledanestimateofthesizeofapossiblecausalrelationship.The

analysestookintoaccounttheassociationbetweeneachgeneticscoreandthematernaltraitit

represented(e.g.BMI),inadditiontotheassociationbetweenthesamegeneticscoreandbirth

weight.Thesetworesultswereusedtocalculateanassociationbetweenthematernaltrait(e.g.

BMI)andbirthweightthatwasfreefromconfounding.Thissecondapproachmeasuresthe

relationshipbetweenvariationinmaternalBMI(orBMI-relatedtrait)andbirthweightthatis

attributableonlytogeneticfactors(seeFigure1foranexplanationofthemethod).Foreach

approachmeta-analysiswasusedtocombinedatafromindividualstudies(seeeMethods).

Usingthefirstapproach,weinvestigatedtheassociationbetweeneachgeneticscoreand(i)birth

weightand(ii)ponderalindex(anindexofneonatalleanness,measuredinkg/m3).Withineach

study,birthweightorponderalindexZ-scoreswereregressedagainsteachmaternalgeneticscore,

adjustedforoffspringsexandgestationalage.Analysesusingthetype2diabetesgeneticscorewere

repeatedafterexcludingparticipantswithpre-existingandgestationaldiabetes.Analysesusingthe

SBPgeneticscorewererepeatedafterexcludingparticipantswithpre-eclampsiaandexistingor

gestationalhypertension.

Thegeneticestimateoftheassociationbetweeneachmaternaltraitandbirthweight/ponderal

indexfromthesecondapproachwascomparedwiththecorrespondingobservationalassociation.

Toobtaintheobservationalestimateslinearregressionwasperformedusingbirthweightor

ponderalindexasthedependentvariable,andeachof7maternaltraitsasindependentvariables,

adjustingforsexandgestationalage.Therewasinsufficientinformationonmaternaltype2diabetes

prevalence,soitwasnotpossibletoestimatethecausalrelationshipforthattrait.Fulldetailsofthe

analysisareprovidedintheeMethods.

11

EstimatinghowmuchoftheassociationbetweenmaternalBMIandbirthweightismediatedby

fastingglucose

Availabledatawereusedtoestimatetheapproximatecausalrelationshipbetweena1SD(≈4kg/m2)

highermaternalBMIand(i)fastingglucoseand(ii)SBP.Usingeachofthoseestimates,theresultsof

theMendelianrandomizationanalyseswererescaledtorepresenttheeffectsoffastingglucoseand

SBPthatcouldbedirectlycomparedwiththecausalrelationshipbetweena1SDhigherBMIand

birthweight(seeeMethodsforadetaileddescriptionofthemethod).

Correctingfordirectfetalgenotypeeffects

Genotypesofmaternal-fetalpairswereavailableinupto8studies(N=upto11,494).Analyseswere

repeatedincludingthefetalgenotypeateachSNPinthemodel,tocorrectforpotentialconfounding

causedbydirecteffectsofthefetalgenotype.

12

Results

Thecharacteristicsofincludedparticipantsfromthe18contributingstudiesareshowninTable1.

Amongthe30,487newbornsthemeanbirthweightrangedfrom3325gto3679g.Themeanpre-

pregnancyBMIwasavailablein11studiesandrangedfrom22.78kg/m2to24.83kg/m2.Themean

maternalageatdelivery,availablein16studies,rangedfrom24.5yearsto31.5years.

Therewasevidenceofassociationbetweeneachgeneticscoreanditscorrespondingmaternaltrait

measuredinpregnancy(P≤0.003;Table2).ForBMI,fastingglucoseandSBP,datafrommultiple

studiesweremeta-analysed,withsimilareffectestimatesbetweenstudiesforBMIandfasting

glucose(Phet>0.05)andevidenceofheterogeneityforSBP(Phet=0.04).Theeffectsizesofassociations

betweenmaternaltraitsandtheirrespectivegeneticscoreswereverysimilarwhencomparedinthe

sameindividualsduringandoutsidepregnancy,withtheexceptionoftheSBPgeneticscorewhich

hadaweakereffectduringpregnancy(eTable5).Therewasnoevidenceofassociationbetweenany

geneticscoreandpotentiallyconfoundingvariables.Noindividualgeneticscorewasassociatedwith

anyoftheothermaternaltraits,exceptforthegeneticscoreforBMI,whichwaspositively

associatedwithSBP(P<0.003Bonferroni-correctedfor15tests;eTable6).

GeneticevidenceforapossiblecausalassociationbetweenhighermaternalBMIandhigherbirth

weight

ThematernalBMIgeneticscorewasassociatedwithhigherbirthweight(Table3)andponderal

index(eTable7)withsimilareffectsizesbeforeandafteradjustingforpossibleeffectsoffetal

genotype.Usingthegeneticscoretoquantifythepossiblecausalassociation,a1SDgenetically

highermaternalBMI(equivalentto4kg/m2)wasassociatedwitha55g(95%CI:17,93)higher

offspringbirthweight.Afteradjustingforfetalgenotype,theestimatedeffectwas104g(95%CI:32,

176)(Table4).TheseMendelianrandomizationcausalestimatesweresimilartotheobservational

13

associationof62g(95%CI:56,70)per1SD(4kg/m2)highermaternalBMI(Figure2).Similarresults

wereobtainedforponderalindex(eTable8andeFigure1).

Geneticevidenceforapossiblecausalassociationbetweenhighermaternalfastingglucoseand

higherbirthweight,butnoassociationwithmaternallipidsoradiponectin

Thematernalfastingglucoseandtype2diabetesgeneticscoreswereassociatedwithhigherbirth

weight(Table3)andponderalindex(eTable7)withsimilareffectsizeestimatesbeforeandafter

adjustingforfetalgenotype,andbeforeandafterexcludingpre-existingandgestationaldiabetes.

Usingthegeneticscoretoestimatethepossiblecausalrelationship,a1SD(0.4mmol/L)genetically

highermaternalglucosewasassociatedwitha114g(95%CI:80,147)higherbirthweight.After

adjustingforfetalgenotype,theassociationwas145g(95%CI:91,199)(Table4).Thesegenetic

estimatesweresimilartotheobservationalassociationof92g(95%CI:80,104)per1SD(0.4mmol/L)

highermaternalglucose(Figure2).Similarresultswereobtainedforponderalindex(eTable8and

eFigure1).

Thematernaltriglyceridegeneticscorewasnotassociatedwithoffspringbirthweight(Table3)or

ponderalindex(eTable7).Usingthegeneticscoretoestimatethepossiblecausalrelationship,a

geneticallyhighermaternaltriglyceridelevelwasnotassociatedwithoffspringbirthweightandthe

95%confidenceintervalsaroundthegeneticestimateexcludedtheobservationalassociation

betweenmaternaltriglyceridesandbirthweight(P=0.007testingdifferencebetweengeneticand

observationalassociation;Table4;Figure2).Likewise,thegeneticestimateofthepossibleeffectof

maternaladiponectinlevelsonoffspringbirthweightwasdifferentfromtheobservational

association(P=0.002).ThegeneticscoreforHDLcwasnotassociatedwithbirthweightorponderal

indexandtheanalysiswasconsistentwithnocausalrelationship,howeverthiscouldnotbe

distinguishedfromthenegativeobservationalassociationbetweenmaternalHDLcandbirthweight.

14

Geneticevidenceforapossiblecausalassociationbetweenhighersystolicbloodpressureand

lowerbirthweight

ThematernalSBPgeneticscorewasassociatedwithlowerbirthweight(Table3)andponderalindex

(eTable7)withsimilareffectsizeestimatesbeforeandafteradjustingforfetalgenotype,andbefore

andafterexcludingmaternalpre-eclampsiaandhypertension.Usingthegeneticscoretoestimate

thepossiblecausalrelationship,a1SD(10mmHg)geneticallyhighermaternalSBPwasassociated

witha-208g(95%CI;-394,-21)loweroffspringbirthweight.Afteradjustingforfetalgenotype,the

estimatedeffectwas-151g(95%CI:-390,89)(Table4).Thegeneticestimateoftheassociation

betweenmaternalSBPandbirthweightinthefullsampleofwomenwasintheoppositedirectionto

theobservationalassociation(P=0.01fordifferencebetweengeneticandobservationalassociations;

Table4;Figure2).Similarresultswereobtainedforponderalindex(eTable8andeFigure1).

ThematernalgeneticscoreforlowervitaminDstatuswasassociatedwithlowerbirthweight

(P=0.03;Table3).However,theestimatedcausalrelationshipwasnotsignificantlydifferentfrom

zero(theestimatedchangeinbirthweightfora10%geneticallylowermaternal25[OH]Dlevelwas-

26g(95%CI:-54,2);Table4,Figure2).

Associationsbetweenthegeneticscoresandbirthweightwereconsistentacrossstudies

Associationsbetweenmaternalgeneticscoresandoffspringbirthweightweresimilarbetween

studiesinthemeta-analysis(Table3;Phet>0.05).Wheredatawerecombinedfromobservational

analyses,theassociationsbetweenmaternalfastingglucoseorSBPandbirthweightweresimilar

(Phet>0.05),andtherewasevidenceofheterogeneityfortheBMI-birthweightobservational

association(Table4;Phet=0.03).

Exposureofthefetustohighermaternalfastingglucoseisunlikelytoexplainalloftheassociation

betweenhighermaternalBMIandhigheroffspringbirthweight

15

ToestimatehowmuchoftheassociationbetweenmaternalBMIandbirthweightmightbe

mediatedbyfastingglucose,theBMIandfastingglucosegeneticscoreswereused:a1SD(≈4

kg/m2)geneticallyhighermaternalBMIwasassociatedwitha0.34SD(≈0.14mmol/L)higher

maternalfastingglucose.FromtheMendelianrandomizationanalyses,1SD(≈0.4mmol/L)

geneticallyhighermaternalfastingglucosewasassociatedwitha114g(95%CI:80,147)higherbirth

weight.Consequently,itwaspredictedthata0.34SDhigherfastingglucosewouldbeassociated

witha114g×0.34=39g[95%CI:27,50]higherbirthweight.Thisapproximationisbroadlysimilarto

thetotalestimatedeffectofa1SDhigherBMIonbirthweight(55g[95%CI:17,93]).However,using

thesamemethodwiththeBMIandSBPgeneticscoresweestimatedthata1SDhighermaternalBMI

wouldbeassociatedwitha-40g[95%CI:-75,-4]lowerbirthweightviaitsassociationwithmaternal

SBP(eFigure2),whichwouldopposethepositiveassociationwithmaternalfastingglucose.

16

Discussion

ThisstudyprovidesevidenceforapossiblecausalassociationbetweenmaternalBMIandoffspring

birthweight.A4kg/m2geneticallyhighermaternalBMI(a1SDrise)wasassociatedwitha55g(95%

CI:17,93)higheroffspringbirthweight.Inaddition,a0.4mmol/l(1SD)geneticallyhighercirculating

maternalfastingglucosewasassociatedwitha114g(95%CI:80,147)higherbirthweight,whilea10

mmHggeneticallyhighermaternalSBPwasassociatedwitha-208g(95%CI:-394,-21)lowerbirth

weight.TheseresultsprovideevidencethatgeneticallyelevatedmaternalglucoseandSBPhave

directionallyoppositecausalassociationswithbirthweight.Theestimatedassociationsbetween

thesematernaltraitsandbirthweight(eitherincreasedorreduced)aresubstantialandofclinical

importance.Theysupporteffortstomaintainhealthygestationalglucoseandbloodpressurelevels

toensurehealthyfetalgrowth.ThepositiveassociationbetweenmaternalBMIandbirthweight

maybepartiallymediatedbytheeffectofhigherBMIoncirculatingmaternalfastingglucose.There

wasnoevidenceofassociationwithageneticscoreformaternaltriglycerides,whichhavealsobeen

hypothesisedtobeimportantcontributorstohigherbirthweightinoverweightorobesewomen.

Otherlipids,orspecificsubclassesoftriglycerides,mightbeimportantbutrequirefurtherstudy.

Theseresultsprovidegeneticevidenceofacausalassociationbetweenmaternalglycemiaandbirth

weightandponderalindex,eveninwomenwithnopre-existingorgestationaldiabetes,whichis

consistentwithpublishedobservationaldata.5Apossibleexplanationforthisfindingisthatwomen

withahighergeneticscorefortype2diabeteshaverelativelyhigherglucoselevelsinpregnancy,as

aresultofinadequatebetacellcompensationinresponsetogestationalinsulinresistance,19,20

leadingtoincreasedplacentalglucosetransferandfetalinsulinsecretion,21andconsequentlyhigher

birthweight.

Thesedatadidnotsupportacausalassociationbetweenmaternaltriglyceride,HDLcoradiponectin

levelsandbirthweightorponderalindex.Thegeneticassociationsbetweenmaternaltriglycerides

17

andadiponectinandbirthweightwerenull,incontrasttotheobservationalassociations,suggesting

thattheobservationalassociationsseenhere,andinotherpublishedstudies8,9,12,areconfounded.

TheMendelianrandomizationanalysisshowedthatthepositiveobservationalassociationbetween

SBPandbirthweightisconfounded,mostlikelybyBMI,whichisbothanimportantriskfactorfor

higherSBPinpregnancyandpositivelyassociatedwithbirthweight.1Usinggeneticvariantsthatare

independentofconfoundingbyBMI,itwasdemonstratedthatgeneticallyhighermaternalSBPis

associatedwithlowerbirthweight,evenafterexcludingpre-eclampsiaandhypertension.The

precisionofourestimateofthechangeinbirthweightper1SDinmaternalSBPcouldbeaffectedby

theheterogeneitybetweenstudiesinthegeneticscore-SBPassociation(P=0.04,I2=76.0%;Table2).

However,associationsbetweentheSBPgeneticscoreandbirthweightwereconsistentacrossall13

meta-analyzedstudies(P=0.14,I2=30.4%;Table3)andsupportiveofacausalassociationbetween

highermaternalSBPandlowerbirthweight.Thesefindingssupportobservationalassociations

betweenmaternalSBPandbirthweightthatwereadjustedforawiderangeofconfounders,22and

areconsistentwithlaboratoryandpopulationstudiessuggestingalinkbetweenhypertensive

disordersofpregnancyandimpairedfetalgrowthduetoplacentalpathology.23Thereareincreasing

concernsabouttheeffecttheobesityepidemicmighthaveonbirthsize,viagreatermaternalBMI.

However,thefocusofthatconcernhasbeenlargelyonincreasedbirthsizeasaresultofgreater

maternalglucoseandotherfetalnutrients.Ourfindingssuggestthatthereareopposingeffectsof

maternalbloodpressureandglucose.

PublishedMendelianrandomizationanalysesprovideevidencethathigherBMIiscausallyassociated

withlowervitaminDstatus,6andevidencefrommultipleobservationalstudiessuggeststhatlower

maternalvitaminDisassociatedwithlowerbirthweight.11,24OuranalysisofthevitaminDgenetic

scoreprovidedsomeevidencetosupportapossiblecausalassociationwithbirthweight,butthis

requiresfurtherexplorationinlargernumbersofpregnancies.

18

Socio-economicfactorsandrelatedbehaviourssuchassmokingarekeyconfoundersof

observationalassociationsbetweenmaternalBMI(orBMI-relatedtraits)andoffspringbirthweight,

sincetheyareassociatedwithbothvariables(seeeTable9forademonstrationoftheseassociations

intheALSPACstudy).Thegeneticscoresusedinouranalyseswerenotassociatedwithsocio-

economicfactorsorsmoking,andthisillustratesakeystrengthoftheMendelianrandomization

approach:sincegenotypesaredeterminedatconception,suchconfoundingisavoided.

Therearesomelimitationstothisstudy.Despiteattemptstomaximisespecificityofthegenetic

scores,wecannotfullyexcludethepossibilitythattheselectedgeneticvariantsactonmorethan

onematernaltrait.Althoughallavailableinformationwasused,therewaslimitedpowertodetect

associationsbetweenthegeneticscoresandothertraits.Forexample,theknownassociation

betweenBMI-associatedvariantsandtriglyceridelevelswasnotdetected.25Withthepotentialfor

high-throughputmetabolomicstudiesandagrowingpublicdatabaseofgeneticassociations,26-28

futurestudieswillimprovethespecificity(fordifferentlipidsub-fractions)ofselectedgenetic

variants.

Despitethelargesampleinthisstudy,statisticalpowertodetectcausalrelationshipswaslimitedfor

somematernaltraits(seeeMethodsandeTable10forpowercalculations).Thetotalsample

provided>99%powertodetectassociationsatP<0.05betweenbirthweightandgeneticscoressuch

asfastingglucoseandsystolicbloodpressurethatexplainatleast0.1%varianceinbirthweight.

However,largersamples(N>80,000)willbeneededtoconfidentlydetectorruleout(i)the

associationwithvitaminDstatussuggestedbyourdata,or(ii)smallerpositiveornegativecausal

associationsbetweenmaternaltriglycerides,HDLcoradiponectinandbirthweight.

19

Whileadjustingforthefetalgeneticscoreswasnecessarytoseparatematernaleffectsfromthe

directeffectsofgeneticvariantsinthefetus,thiscouldpotentiallyintroducebiasviaassociation

withpaternalgenotypes.AssortativematingforBMIcouldadditionallyresultinacorrelation

betweenmaternalandpaternalgenotypes,leadingtosimilarbias.However,afather’sgeneticscore

wouldonlyconfoundtheMendelianrandomizationestimatesifthefather’sphenotypewererelated

tobirthweight,andwefoundonlyveryweakassociationsoffathersBMIandrelatedtraitswith

offspringbirthweight(eTable11).Anotherpotentialbiascouldbeinducedbytheuseofthegenetic

scoreforSBP,whichwasderivedfromagenome-wideassociationstudyofbloodpressure

conditionalonBMI.SinceBMIisalsoassociatedwithbirthweight,thiscouldbiastheresults.

However,similarresultswereobtainedusinganalternativegeneticscorethatwasunadjustedfor

BMI(eMethods).

InMendelianrandomizationanalysis,aweakstatisticalassociationbetweenageneticscoreanda

maternaltrait(duetolowvarianceexplainedand/orsmallsamplesize)hasthepotentialtocause

weakinstrumentbiastowardstheobservationalresults.29Theproportionsofmaternaltraitvariance

explainedbythegeneticscoresaremodestinourstudy(Table2).However,thelargeoverallsample

sizeensuredthatthepossiblecausalassociationsidentifiedareunlikelytobeduetoweak

instrumentbias(seeeMethods).

OuranalysesassumethatmaternalBMIandrelatedtraitsarelinearlyassociatedwithoffspringbirth

weight.Wehavenottestedfornon-linearassociationswhich,inaMendelianrandomizationdesign,

wouldrequireverylargenumbers30.However,formaternalBMI,fastingglucoseandsystolicblood

pressure,thereisobservationalevidenceofsuchlinearassociationsacrossthedistribution,withno

evidenceofthresholdorcurvilinearassociations5,10,31.

20

Conclusions

InthisMendelianrandomizationstudyofmorethan30,000womenwithsingletonoffspringfrom18

studies,geneticallyelevatedmaternalBMIandbloodglucoselevelswerepotentiallycausally

associatedwithhigheroffspringbirthweight,whereasgeneticallyelevatedmaternalsystolicblood

pressurewasshowntobepotentiallycausallyrelatedtolowerbirthweight.Ifreplicated,these

findingsmayhaveimplicationsforcounselingandmanagingpregnanciestoavoidadverseweight-

relatedbirthoutcomes.

21

REFERENCES

1. LawlorDA,ReltonC,SattarN,NelsonSM.Maternaladiposity--adeterminantofperinatalandoffspringoutcomes?NatRevEndocrinol.2012;8(11):679-688.

2. ShinD,SongWO.Prepregnancybodymassindexisanindependentriskfactorforgestationalhypertension,gestationaldiabetes,pretermlabor,andsmall-andlarge-for-gestational-ageinfants.JMaternFetalNeonatalMed.2014:1-8.

3. HarmonKA,GerardL,JensenDR,etal.Continuousglucoseprofilesinobeseandnormal-weightpregnantwomenonacontrolleddiet:metabolicdeterminantsoffetalgrowth.DiabetesCare.2011;34(10):2198-2204.

4. LandonMB,MeleL,SpongCY,etal.Therelationshipbetweenmaternalglycemiaandperinataloutcome.ObstetGynecol.2011;117(2Pt1):218-224.

5. MetzgerBE,LoweLP,DyerAR,etal.Hyperglycemiaandadversepregnancyoutcomes.NEnglJMed.2008;358(19):1991-2002.

6. VimaleswaranKS,BerryDJ,LuC,etal.CausalrelationshipbetweenobesityandvitaminDstatus:bi-directionalMendelianrandomizationanalysisofmultiplecohorts.PLoSMed.2013;10(2):e1001383.

7. GaillardR,DurmusB,HofmanA,MackenbachJP,SteegersEA,JaddoeVW.Riskfactorsandoutcomesofmaternalobesityandexcessiveweightgainduringpregnancy.Obesity(SilverSpring).2013;21(5):1046-1055.

8. MisraVK,TrudeauS,PerniU.Maternalserumlipidsduringpregnancyandinfantbirthweight:theinfluenceofprepregnancyBMI.Obesity(SilverSpring).2011;19(7):1476-1481.

9. KulkarniSR,KumaranK,RaoSR,etal.Maternallipidsareasimportantasglucoseforfetalgrowth:findingsfromthePuneMaternalNutritionStudy.DiabetesCare.2013;36(9):2706-2713.

10. Macdonald-WallisC,TillingK,FraserA,NelsonSM,LawlorDA.Associationsofbloodpressurechangeinpregnancywithfetalgrowthandgestationalageatdelivery:findingsfromaprospectivecohort.Hypertension.2014;64(1):36-44.

11. LeffelaarER,VrijkotteTG,vanEijsdenM.MaternalearlypregnancyvitaminDstatusinrelationtofetalandneonatalgrowth:resultsofthemulti-ethnicAmsterdamBornChildrenandtheirDevelopmentcohort.BrJNutr.2010;104(1):108-117.

12. LoweLP,MetzgerBE,LoweWL,Jr.,etal.Inflammatorymediatorsandglucoseinpregnancy:resultsfromasubsetoftheHyperglycemiaandAdversePregnancyOutcome(HAPO)Study.JClinEndocrinolMetab.2010;95(12):5427-5434.

13. DaveySmithG,EbrahimS.'Mendelianrandomization':cangeneticepidemiologycontributetounderstandingenvironmentaldeterminantsofdisease?IntJEpidemiol.2003;32(1):1-22.

14. LawlorDA,HarbordRM,SterneJA,TimpsonN,DaveySmithG.Mendelianrandomization:usinggenesasinstrumentsformakingcausalinferencesinepidemiology.StatMed.2008;27(8):1133-1163.

15. KwakSH,KimSH,ChoYM,etal.Agenome-wideassociationstudyofgestationaldiabetesmellitusinKoreanwomen.Diabetes.2012;61(2):531-541.

16. BerryDJ,VimaleswaranKS,WhittakerJC,HingoraniAD,HypponenE.EvaluationofgeneticmarkersasinstrumentsforMendelianrandomizationstudiesonvitaminD.PLoSOne.2012;7(5):e37465.

17. VimaleswaranKS,CavadinoA,BerryDJ,etal.AssociationofvitaminDstatuswitharterialbloodpressureandhypertensionrisk:amendelianrandomisationstudy.LancetDiabetesEndocrinol.2014;2(9):719-729.

18. LawlorDA,FraserA,LindsayRS,etal.Associationofexistingdiabetes,gestationaldiabetesandglycosuriainpregnancywithmacrosomiaandoffspringbodymassindex,waistandfatmassinlaterchildhood:findingsfromaprospectivepregnancycohort.Diabetologia.2010;53(1):89-97.

22

19. HayesMG,UrbanekM,HivertMF,etal.IdentificationofHKDC1andBACE2asgenesinfluencingglycemictraitsduringpregnancythroughgenome-wideassociationstudies.Diabetes.2013;62(9):3282-3291.

20. FreathyRM,HayesMG,UrbanekM,etal.HyperglycemiaandAdversePregnancyOutcome(HAPO)study:commongeneticvariantsinGCKandTCF7L2areassociatedwithfastingandpostchallengeglucoselevelsinpregnancyandwiththenewconsensusdefinitionofgestationaldiabetesmellitusfromtheInternationalAssociationofDiabetesandPregnancyStudyGroups.Diabetes.2010;59(10):2682-2689.

21. PedersenJ.Thepregnantdiabeticandhernewborn:problemsandmanagement.Baltimore:Williams&Wilkins;1977.

22. LawlorDA,DaveySmithG,EbrahimS.Birthweightofoffspringandinsulinresistanceinlateadulthood:crosssectionalsurvey.BMJ.2002;325(7360):359.

23. Rich-EdwardsJW,FraserA,LawlorDA,CatovJM.Pregnancycharacteristicsandwomen'sfuturecardiovascularhealth:anunderusedopportunitytoimprovewomen'shealth?EpidemiolRev.2014;36(1):57-70.

24. BodnarLM,CatovJM,ZmudaJM,etal.Maternalserum25-hydroxyvitaminDconcentrationsareassociatedwithsmall-for-gestationalagebirthsinwhitewomen.JNutr.2010;140(5):999-1006.

25. FallT,HaggS,MagiR,etal.Theroleofadiposityincardiometabolictraits:aMendelianrandomizationanalysis.PLoSMed.2013;10(6):e1001474.

26. WurtzP,WangQ,KangasAJ,etal.Metabolicsignaturesofadiposityinyoungadults:mendelianrandomizationanalysisandeffectsofweightchange.PLoSMed.2014;11(12):e1001765.

27. ShinSY,FaumanEB,PetersenAK,etal.Anatlasofgeneticinfluencesonhumanbloodmetabolites.NatGenet.2014;46(6):543-550.

28. KettunenJ,TukiainenT,SarinAP,etal.Genome-wideassociationstudyidentifiesmultiplelociinfluencinghumanserummetabolitelevels.NatGenet.2012;44(3):269-276.

29. BurgessS,ThompsonSG,CollaborationCCG.AvoidingbiasfromweakinstrumentsinMendelianrandomizationstudies.IntJEpidemiol.2011;40(3):755-764.

30. SilverwoodRJ,HolmesMV,DaleCE,etal.Testingfornon-linearcausaleffectsusingabinarygenotypeinaMendelianrandomizationstudy:applicationtoalcoholandcardiovasculartraits.IntJEpidemiol.2014;43(6):1781-1790.

31. GroupHSCR.HyperglycaemiaandAdversePregnancyOutcome(HAPO)Study:associationswithmaternalbodymassindex.BJOG.2010;117(5):575-584.

32. CatalanoPM,McIntyreHD,CruickshankJK,etal.Thehyperglycemiaandadversepregnancyoutcomestudy:associationsofGDMandobesitywithpregnancyoutcomes.DiabetesCare.2012;35(4):780-786.

33. FraserA,Macdonald-WallisC,TillingK,etal.CohortProfile:theAvonLongitudinalStudyofParentsandChildren:ALSPACmotherscohort.IntJEpidemiol.2013;42(1):97-110.

34. SchlemmL,HaumannHM,ZiegnerM,etal.Newevidenceforthefetalinsulinhypothesis:fetalangiotensinogenM235Tpolymorphismisassociatedwithbirthweightandelevatedfetaltotalglycatedhemoglobinatbirth.JHypertens.2010;28(4):732-739.

35. PowerC,ElliottJ.Cohortprofile:1958Britishbirthcohort(NationalChildDevelopmentStudy).IntJEpidemiol.2006;35(1):34-41.

36. ZhaoJ,LiM,BradfieldJP,etal.Examinationoftype2diabeteslociimplicatesCDKAL1asabirthweightgene.Diabetes.2009;58(10):2414-2418.

37. BisgaardH.TheCopenhagenProspectiveStudyonAsthmainChildhood(COPSAC):design,rationale,andbaselinedatafromalongitudinalbirthcohortstudy.AnnAllergyAsthmaImmunol.2004;93(4):381-389.

23

38. NohrEA,TimpsonNJ,AndersenCS,DaveySmithG,OlsenJ,SorensenTI.Severeobesityinyoungwomenandreproductivehealth:theDanishNationalBirthCohort.PLoSOne.2009;4(12):e8444.

39. OlsenJ,MelbyeM,OlsenSF,etal.TheDanishNationalBirthCohort--itsbackground,structureandaim.ScandJPublicHealth.2001;29(4):300-307.

40. KnightB,ShieldsBM,HattersleyAT.TheExeterFamilyStudyofChildhoodHealth(EFSOCH):studyprotocolandmethodology.PaediatrPerinatEpidemiol.2006;20(2):172-179.

41. LacroixM,BattistaMC,DoyonM,etal.Loweradiponectinlevelsatfirsttrimesterofpregnancyareassociatedwithincreasedinsulinresistanceandhigherriskofdevelopinggestationaldiabetesmellitus.DiabetesCare.2013;36(6):1577-1583.

42. JaddoeVW,vanDuijnCM,FrancoOH,etal.TheGenerationRStudy:designandcohortupdate2012.EurJEpidemiol.2012;27(9):739-756.

43. MagnusP,IrgensLM,HaugK,etal.Cohortprofile:theNorwegianMotherandChildCohortStudy(MoBa).IntJEpidemiol.2006;35(5):1146-1150.

44. RantakallioP.Groupsatriskinlowbirthweightinfantsandperinatalmortality.ActaPaediatrScand.1969;193:Suppl193:191+.

45. BoomsmaDI,deGeusEJ,VinkJM,etal.NetherlandsTwinRegister:fromtwinstotwinfamilies.TwinResHumGenet.2006;9(6):849-857.

46. MedlandSE,NyholtDR,PainterJN,etal.CommonvariantsinthetrichohyalingeneareassociatedwithstraighthairinEuropeans.AmJHumGenet.2009;85(5):750-755.

47. MoayyeriA,HammondCJ,ValdesAM,SpectorTD.CohortProfile:TwinsUKandhealthyageingtwinstudy.IntJEpidemiol.2013;42(1):76-85.

48. MoayyeriA,HammondCJ,HartDJ,SpectorTD.TheUKAdultTwinRegistry(TwinsUKResource).TwinResHumGenet.2013;16(1):144-149.

49. SpeliotesEK,WillerCJ,BerndtSI,etal.Associationanalysesof249,796individualsreveal18newlociassociatedwithbodymassindex.NatGenet.2010;42(11):937-948.

50. DupuisJ,LangenbergC,ProkopenkoI,etal.Newgeneticlociimplicatedinfastingglucosehomeostasisandtheirimpactontype2diabetesrisk.Nat.Genet.2010;42(2):105-116.

51. MorrisAP,VoightBF,TeslovichTM,etal.Large-scaleassociationanalysisprovidesinsightsintothegeneticarchitectureandpathophysiologyoftype2diabetes.NatGenet.2012;44(9):981-990.

52. TeslovichTM,MusunuruK,SmithAV,etal.Biological,clinicalandpopulationrelevanceof95lociforbloodlipids.Nature.2010;466(7307):707-713.

53. EhretGB.Genome-wideassociationstudies:contributionofgenomicstounderstandingbloodpressureandessentialhypertension.CurrHypertensRep.2010;12(1):17-25.

54. YaghootkarH,LaminaC,ScottRA,etal.Mendelianrandomizationstudiesdonotsupportacausalroleforreducedcirculatingadiponectinlevelsininsulinresistanceandtype2diabetes.Diabetes.2013;62(10):3589-3598.

55. FreathyRM,Mook-KanamoriDO,SovioU,etal.VariantsinADCY5andnearCCNL1areassociatedwithfetalgrowthandbirthweight.Nat.Genet.2010;42(5):430-435.

24

ARTICLEINFORMATION

AuthorContributionsDr.FreathyandProfsLawlorandFraylinghadfullaccesstoallofthedataintheALSPAC,EFSOCHandHAPO(non-GWAS)studiesandaccesstosummarydatafromallcontributingstudiesandtakeresponsibilityfortheintegrityofthedataandaccuracyofthedataanalysis.Studyconceptanddesign:J.Tyrrell,D.A.Lawlor,T.M.Frayling&R.M.FreathyAnalysisandinterpretationofdata:J.Tyrrell,R.C.Richmond,S.Metrustry,B.Feenstra,A.Cavadino,E.Hyppönen,M-FHivert,J.F.Felix,W.L.Lowe,D.A.Lawlor,T.M.Frayling&R.M.FreathyDraftingmanuscript:J.Tyrrell,R.C.Richmond,S.Metrustry,B.Feenstra,A.Cavadino,E.Hyppönen,M-FHivert,J.F.Felix,W.L.Lowe,D.A.Lawlor,T.M.Frayling&R.M.Freathy

Criticalrevisionofmanuscriptforimportantintellectualcontent:Allauthors

Statisticalanalysis:N.M.G.DeSilva,A.R.Wood,G.McMahon,D.M.Evans,E.Kreiner-Møller,F.Geller,C.Allard,J-J.Hottenga,J.P.Bradfield,M.G.Hayes,D.M.Scholtens,L.L.Armstrong,J.Rangaraja,M.Horikoshi,M.I.McCarthy,M.Nodzenski,L.Paternoster,S.Das,V.Huikari,J.N.Painter,S.E.Medland,P.A.Lind,D.J.Berry,R.Myhre,V.Sengpiel,J.Tyrrell,R.C.Richmond,S.Metrustry,B.Feenstra,A.Cavadino,J.F.Felix,D.A.Lawlor&R.M.Freathy

Genotyping:D.M.Evans,S.M.Ring,J.C.Murray,L.Bouchard,J.F.Felix,J-J.Hottenga,H.Hakonarson,T.I.A.Sørensen,N.G.Martin,E.A.Nohr,T.D.Spector,S.F.Grant,D.A.Lawlor,T.M.Frayling&R.M.Freathy

Individualstudydesign:T.D.Spector,B.Jacobsson,C.Power,N.G.Martin,S.Serbert,T.I.A.Sørensen,M.Järvelin,B.Hocher,M.G.Hayes,W.L.Lowe,S.F.Grant,H.Hakonarson,J.P.Bradfield,E.J.C.deGeus,V.W.Jaddoe,A.Hofman,M.Melbye,J.C.Murray,H.Bisgaard,G.DaveySmith,A.T.Hattersley,E.Hyppönen,M-FHivert,J.F.Felix,W.L.Lowe,D.A.Lawlor,&T.M.Frayling

Phenotypingincontributingstudies:T.D.Spector,B.Jacobsson,C.Power,E.Hyppönen,N.G.Martin,T.I.A.Sørensen,E.A.Nohr,C.Reichetzeder,B.Hocher,S.F.Grant,H.Hakonarson,J.P.Bradfield,G.Willemsen,V.W.Jaddoe,M-FHivert,M.Melbye,F.Geller,B.Feenstra,E.Kreiner-Møller,H.Bisgaard,G.DaveySmith,S.M.Ring,D.A.Lawlor,B.Knight,A.T.Hattersley

25

ConflictsofInterestandFinancialDisclosuresNoconflictsofinterestwerereported.Funding/SupportFunding/supportofauthorsisasfollows(fundingdetailsforindividualstudiesarereportedintheSupplementaryMaterial).T.M.FandA.R.WaresupportedbytheEuropeanResearchCouncilgrant:323195SZ-24550371-GLUCOSEGENES-FP7-IDEAS-ERC;A.T.H.andM.I.M.areWellcomeTrustSeniorInvestigators;M.I.M.isanNIHRSeniorInvestigator.R.M.F.isaSirHenryDaleFellow(WellcomeTrustandRoyalSocietygrant:104150/Z/14/Z);J.T.isfundedbytheERDFandaDiabetesResearchandWellnessFoundationFellowship;RCRisfundedbytheWellcomeTrust4-yearstudentship(GrantCode:WT083431MF).D.A.L.,G.D-S.,D.M.E.andS.R.allworkinaUnitthatreceivesfundingfromtheUniversityofBristolandtheUKMedicalResearchCouncil(MC_UU_1201/1/5,MC_UU_1201/1andMC_UU_1201/4).D.A.L.issupportedbyawardsfromtheWellcomeTrust(WT094529MAandWT088806),USNationalInstituteofHealth(R01DK10324)andisanNIHRSeniorInvestigator(NF-SI-0611-10196).D.M.EandS.E.M.weresupportedbyAustralianResearchCouncilFutureFellowship(FT130101709andFT110100548).B.FissupportedbyanOakFoundationScholarship.L.B.isajuniorresearchscholarfromtheFondsdelarechercheensantéduQuébec(FRQS)andamemberoftheFRQS-fundedCentrederechercheduCHUS.M.F.H.isaFRQSresearchscholarsandwasawardedaClinicalScientistAwardbytheCanadianDiabetesAssociationandtheMaudMentenAwardfromtheInstituteofGenetics–CanadianInstituteofHealthResearch(CIHR).C.A.wasawardedtheCIHR-FrederickBantingandCharlesBestCanadaGraduateScholarships.V.W.J.issupportedbytheNetherlandsOrganizationforHealthResearchandDevelopment(ZonMw–VIDI016.136.361).A.P.M.isaWellcomeTrustSeniorResearchFellow(grantnumberWT098017).T.S.isholderofanERCAdvancedPrincipalInvestigatoraward.RoleoftheSponsorsThefundingagencieshadnoroleinthedesignandconductofthestudy;collection,management,analysisandinterpretationofdata;preparation,review,approvalofmanuscript;ordecisiontosubmitmanuscriptforpublication.PreviousPresentationsThisworkwaspresentedattheDiabetesUKAnnualProfessionalConference2014,5-7March,Liverpool,UK.AdditionalContributionsWeareextremelygratefultotheparticipantsandfamilieswhocontributedtoallofthestudiesandtheteamsofinvestigatorsinvolvedineachone.Theseincludeinterviewers,computerandlaboratorytechnicians,clericalworkers,researchscientists,volunteers,managers,receptionistsandnurses.Foradditionalstudy-specificacknowledgements,pleaseseeSupplementaryMaterial.ThisresearchhasbeenconductedusingtheUKBiobankresource.

26

FIGURE/BOXLEGENDS

Box1.Thematernalobesity-relatedtraitshypothesizedtocauseincreasedordecreasedfetalgrowth,

based on observational associations with birth weight: body mass index (BMI)1; fasting glucose5;

gestationalortype2diabetes32;triglycerides9;HDL-cholesterol8;systolicbloodpressure10;vitaminD

status(asindicatedby25-hydroxyvitaminD,25[OH]Dlevel)11;adiponectin12.

Figure1

PrincipleofMendelianrandomization:Ifamaternaltraitcausallyinfluencesoffspringbirthweight,

thenariskscoreofgeneticvariantsassociatedwiththattraitwillalsobeassociatedwithbirth

weight.Sincegenotypeisdeterminedatconception,itshouldnotbeassociatedwithfactorsthat

normallyconfoundtheassociationbetweenmaternaltraitsandbirthweight(e.g.socio-economic

status).Estimatesofthegeneticscore-maternalphenotypeassociation(w)andthegeneticscore-

birthweightassociation(x)maybeusedtoestimatetheassociationbetweenthematernaltrait

variationthatisduetogeneticscore,andbirthweight(y=x/w),whichisexpectedtobefreefrom

confounding.Iftheestimatedcausalrelationship,y,isdifferentfromtheobservationalassociation

betweenthemeasuredmaternalphenotypeandbirthweight,thiswouldsuggestthatthe

observationalassociationisconfounded(assumingthattheassumptionsoftheMendelian

randomizationanalysesarevalid).14Thedashedlineconnectingmaternaltraitwithfetalgrowthhas

noarrow,toindicatethatthecausalnatureoftheassociationisuncertain.Itisimportanttoadjust

forpossibledirecteffectsoffetalgenotype(z).

Figure2.Comparisonoftheobservationalwiththegeneticchangeinbirthweight(ingrams)fora1

standarddeviation(SD)changeineachmaternalobesity-relatedtrait.For25[OH]Dandadiponectin,

wepresentthechangeinbirthweightfora10%changeinmaternaltraitlevelbecausethese

variableswereloggedforanalysis.ThegeneticchangewasestimatedfromMendelian

randomizationanalysis,inwhichageneticscorewasusedtoestimatethepossiblecausal

27

relationshipbetweenthematernaltraitandbirthweight.Thegeneticestimateispresentedtwice:in

thesecondcaseitwasadjustedforfetalgenotypeusingasubsetofavailablestudies.Theerrorbars

representthe95%confidenceintervalsaroundtheeffectsizeestimates.Formaternalpre-

pregnancyBMIandfastingglucose,the95%confidenceintervalsforboththeobservationaland

geneticapproachesexcludethenull,suggestingpositivepossiblecausalrelationshipsbetween

maternalBMIandfastingglucoseandbirthweight.FormaternalSBP,theobservationalanalysis

suggestedaweakpositiveassociationwithbirthweight,whereasthegeneticanalysisshowed

evidenceofanegativepossiblecausalrelationship.Observationalanalysessuggestedthathigher

maternaltriglyceridelevels,lowermaternaladiponectinandlowermaternalHDL-cholesterollevels

wereassociatedwithhigherbirthweight,whilelowermaternalvitaminDstatuswasassociatedwith

lowerbirthweight,butnoneoftheseweresupportedbythegeneticanalyses.

28Table1.Keycharacteristicsofparticipantsbystudy(forfulldetails,seeeTable1)

Abbreviatedstudyname*

Country(samplesource)

Offspringyearsofbirth

Nwomenwithbirthweightofonechild

Noffspringwith

genotype

Meanmaternalageat

deliveryinyears(SD)

Meanmaternal

pre-pregnancyBMI(SD)in

kg/m2

Meanoffspring

birthweight(SD)ingrams

ALSPACmothers33 UK 1991-1992 7304 4913 28.5(4.8) 22.93(3.73) 3481(475)

BBCmothers34 Germany 2000-2004 1357 1357 30.1(5.4) 22.78(3.93) 3472(511)

B58C-WTCCC35 UK 1972-2000 855 NA 26.2(5.2) NA 3325(483)

B58C-T1DGC35 UK 1972-2000 836 NA 26.1(5.4) NA 3379(469)

CHOPmothers36 USA 1987-

present 312 NA NA NA 3440(562)

COPSAC-2000mothers37 Denmark 1998-2001 282 282 30.4(4.3) NA 3560(505)

DNBC-GOYA38 Denmark 1996-2002 1805 NA 29.2(4.2) 23.57(4.27) 3643(495)

DNBC-PTB-CONTROL39 Denmark 1987-2009 1649 975 29.9(4.2) 23.57(4.27) 3595(497)

EFSOCHmothers40 UK 2000-2004 746 332‡ 30.5(5.3) 24.07(4.42) 3512(480)

GEN-3Gmothers41 Canada 2010-2013 676 NA 28.4(4.4) 24.83(5.63) 3448(433)

GenerationRmothers42 TheNetherlands 2002-2006 3810 2196 31.2(4.5)† 23.12(3.92) 3528(494)

HAPOmothers(GWAS)5

UK,Canada,Australia 2000-2006 1380 1300 31.5(5.3)† 24.5(5.0) 3557(517)

HAPOmothers(non-

GWAS)5

USA,UK,Canada,Australia

2000-2006 3590 2318 30.4(5.4)† 24.63(5.33) 3526(463)

MoBamothers43 Norway 1999-2008 650 350 28.5(3.3) 23.93(3.94) 3679(430)

NFBC196644 Finland 1987-2001 2035 NA 26.5(3.7) NA 3525(461)

NTR45 TheNetherlands 1946-2003 706 NA 27.1(3.7) NA 3469(529)

QIMR46 Australia 1929-1990 892 NA Q24.5(4.0)R 22.79(5.13) 3344(532)

TwinsUK47,48 UK NA 1602 NA NA NA 3365(581)

*Expandedstudynames:ALSPAC,AvonLongitudinalStudyofParentsandChildren;BBC,BerlinBirthCohort;B58C-WTCCC,1958BritishBirthCohort-WellcomeTrustCaseControlConsortium;B58C-T1DGC,1958BritishBirthCohort-Type1DiabetesGeneticsConsortium;CHOP,Children’sHospitalOfPhiladelphia;DNBC-GOYA,DanishNationalBirthCohort-GeneticsofObesityinYoungAdultsstudy;DNBC-PTB-CONTROLS,DanishNationalBirthCohortPretermBirthstudyControls;EFSOCH,ExeterFamilyStudyOfChildhoodHealth;GEN-3G,GeneticsofGlycemicregulationinGestationandGrowth;HAPO,HyperglycemiaandAdversePregnancyOutcomestudy(GWAS,Genome-WideAssociationStudy);MoBa,theNorwegianMotherandBabyCohort;NFBC1966,theNorthernFinland1966BirthCohort;NTR,NetherlandsTwinRegistry;QIMR,QueenslandInstituteofMedicalResearch.†InGenerationR,maternalagewasrecorded,onaverage,at14.4weeksofgestation;inHAPO,maternalagewasrecorded,onaverage,at28weeksofgestation.‡FetalgenotypeinEFSOCHavailableonlyforthefastingglucosegeneticscore.NA,notavailable.

29Table2.Associationsbetweenmaternalgeneticscoresandmaternalobesity-relatedtraits

Maternalobesity-relatedtrait

NumberofSNPsusedtoconstructgeneticscore

ReferenceforprimaryGWAS

paperforeachsetofSNPs*

Estimateof%variancein

maternaltraitexplainedby

geneticscoreinpregnantwomen†

TotalNwomenwithtraitmeasured

duringpregnancy(exceptBMI,for

whichtheappropriate

measurementispre-pregnancy)

Nstudies

Estimatedchangeinmaternaltraitperaverageweighted

trait-raising/lowering‡allele(95%CI)

Pvalue

HeterogeneityPvalue;I2%,

whereresultsfrom>1studyweremeta-analysed

Higherpre-pregnancyBodyMassIndex

(BMI)30

Speliotesetal.,2010,NatGenet49

1.8%inALSPAC11,822 5 0.145(0.126,0.164)

kg/m2 <2x10-16 0.18;35.8

Higherfastingglucose§ 13

Dupuisetal.2010,NatGenet50

5%inEFSOCH5,402 3 0.029(0.025,0.032)

mmol/L <2x10-16 0.70;0

Higheroddsofgestationaldiabetesandexistingdiabetes(SNPsassociatedwith

type2diabetes)

55

Morrisetal.2012,NatGenet51

1.4%inALSPAC6,606

(54Cases,6,552controls)

1 Oddsratio:1.08(1.03,1.14) 0.003 -

Highertriglycerides 17 Teslovichetal.2010,Nature52

3%inEFSOCH 663 1 0.055(0.032,0.078)mmol/L 3x10-6 -

LowerHDL-cholesterol 4 Teslovichetal.2010,Nature52

3%inEFSOCH 733 1 -0.050(-0.072,-0.027)mmol/L 1x10-5 -

Highersystolicbloodpressure 33 Ehretetal.2010,

Nature531%inALSPAC 8,450 2 0.186(0.140,0.231)

mmHg <2x10-16 0.04;76.0

LowervitaminDstatus,ln[25(OH)D] 2(“Synthesis”score)¶

Vimaleswaranetal.2013,PloSMed6

0.2%inALSPAC4,767 1 -0.024(-0.039,-

0.009)onlogscale 0.002 -

Loweradiponectin,ln[adiponectin] 3

Yaghootkaretal.2013,Diabetes54

2%inHAPO1,376 1 -0.17(-0.23,-0.11)

onlogscale 1x10-8 -

*Thereferencesincolumn3indicatethepublishedgenome-wideassociationstudiesthatoriginallyidentifiedtheSNPsusedinthegeneticscores(studiesofnon-pregnantindividuals).†Toestimatethevarianceineachtraitexplainedbyitsrespectivegeneticscoreinpregnantwomen(column4),thelargestavailablestudywasused.Abbreviations:ALSPAC,AvonLongitudinalStudyofParentsandChildren33.EFSOCH,ExeterFamilyStudyOfChildhoodHealth40.HAPO,HyperglycemiaandAdversePregnancyOutcomestudy5.FurtherdetailsabouttheincludedstudiescanbefoundineTable4.‡Thedecisiontomodeltheassociationinrelationtothetrait-raisingortrait-loweringalleledependedontheknowndirectionofassociationofeachtraitwithhigherBMI(seeBox1).Column1specifieseachofthesedirectionsofassociation.§Removingtheonestudyinwhichthers10830963SNPwaspoorlyimputed(r2<0.8),weobtainedverysimilarresults(n=4026;effectsize=0.028(95%CI:0.024,0.032);P<2x10-16;Phet=0.46;I2=0%).

30¶ThetwoSNPsselectedforthevitaminDgeneticscorehaveahypothesizedroleinthesynthesisofvitaminD(asopposedtoitsmetabolism)andarerecommendedforuseinMendelianrandomizationstudies.16,17Levelsof25(OH)Dandadiponectinlevelswerelog-transformedtoachievenormalitybeforeanalyses.

31Table3.Associationsbetweenmaternalgeneticscoresandbirthweightofoffspring

Maternaltraitforwhichgeneticscorewas

constructedNstudies TotalN

women

Estimatedchangeinoffspringbirthweight(grams)permaternaltrait-

raising/lowering*allele(95%CI),tothenearest1

gram†

Pvalue

HeterogeneityPValue;I2%frommeta-analysis

Nstudieswithfetalgenotypes

TotalNoffspringwith

genotypesavailable

Estimatedchangeinbirthweight(grams)permaternaltrait-raising/loweringallele*(95%CI),tothenearest1gram†,adjustedforfetal

genotypes

Pvalue(adjustedforfetal

genotypes)

HeterogeneityPValue;I2%frommeta-analysis

(adjustedforfetal

genotypes)

Higherpre-pregnancyBMI 16 25,265 2(0,3) 0.008 0.84;0 7 10,964 4(1,6) 0.004 0.20;30.5

Higherfastingglucose 15 23,902 8(6,10) 7x10-14 0.11;33.3 8 11,493 11(7,14) 7x10-9 0.26;21.6

Higheroddsoftype2Diabetes 12 18,670 2(0,2) 0.06 0.22;23.1 5 7,769 4(2,6) 0.0004 0.81;0

Higheroddsoftype2Diabetes(excludingpre-existingandgestational

diabetes)

6 13,029 2(1,3) 0.02 0.92;0 4 6,210 4(1,6) 0.006 0.93;0

Highertriglycerides 15 24,985 -2(-4,0) 0.12 0.83;0 6 11,031 -2(-7,1) 0.21 0.86;0

LowerHDL-cholesterol 15 22,167 0(-3,3) 1 0.52;0 6 9,176 0(-5,5) 0.98 0.85;0

Highersystolicbloodpressure 13 20,062 -4(-6,-2) 1x10-5 0.14;30.4 5 7,790 -3(-6,0) 0.09 0.50;0

Highersystolicbloodpressure(excludingpre-

eclampsiaandhypertension)

7 13,271 -5(-7,-3) 6x10-6 0.18;32 4 5,488 -4(-8,0) 0.04 0.16;41.2

LowervitaminDstatus 18 30,340 -6(-12,0) 0.03 0.13;37.1 3 9,510 -14(-25,3) 0.01 0.77;0

Loweradiponectin 9 14,920 -2(-16,12) 0.76 0.90;0 5 7,820 7(-16,30) 0.55 0.71;0

*Thedecisiontomodeltheassociationinrelationtothetrait-raisingortrait-loweringalleledependedontheknowndirectionofassociationofeachtraitwithhigherBMI(seeBox1).Column1specifieseachofthesedirectionsofassociation.Resultsareperaverageweightedallele,adjustedforsexandgestationalage.†StandarddeviationofbirthweightaveragedoveranumberofEuropeanstudies(=484g)55wasusedtogeneratetheseestimatesfromz-scores.Weconsidereda2-tailedPvalueof<0.05toprovideevidenceagainstthenullhypothesis.

32

33Table4.Acomparisonoftheobservationalwiththegeneticassociationbetweeneachmaternaltraitandoffspringbirthweight

Maternaltrait Valueofa1SDchangeinthetraitwithunits

Study/ies*usedforobservationalestimates

[TotalNwomen]

Nwomenforobservationalestimates

Observationalestimateofthechangeinbirth

weight(g)per1SD(or10%†)changein

maternaltrait,adjustedforsexand

gestationalage(95%CI)

Geneticestimateofthechangeinbirthweight(g),adjusted

forsexandgestationalage,per1SD(or10%†)changeinmaternaltrait,unadjustedfor

fetalgenotype(95%CI)[NwomenasinTables

1and2]

Pvalue‡comparing

observationalwithgeneticbirth

weightassociations(unadjustedforfetalgenotype)

Geneticestimateofthechangeinbirthweight(g),adjusted

forsex,gestationalageandfetalgenotype,per1SD(or10%†)changeinmaternaltrait(95%CI)[N

offspringasinTables1and2]

Pvalue‡comparing

observationalwithgeneticbirth

weightassociations(adjustedfor

fetalgenotype)

Higherpre-pregnancyBMI 4kg/m2

ALSPACMothers,EFSOCHMothers,HAPO

Mothers11,969 62(56,70) 55(17,93) 0.70 104(32,176) 0.28

Higherfastingglucose 0.4mmol/L EFSOCHMothers,HAPO

Mothers 6,008 92(80,104) 114(80,147) 0.28 145(91,199) 0.09

Highertriglycerides 0.7mmol/L EFSOCHMothers 930 32(7,56) -24(-55,8) 0.007 -33(-86,20) 0.03

LowerHDL-cholesterol 0.5mmol/L EFSOCHMothers 927 30(3,58) 0(-33,34) 0.17 -1(-55,54) 0.32

Highersystolicbloodpressure 10mmHg ALSPACMothers,HAPO

Mothers 12,077 24(15,34) -208(-394,-21) 0.01 -151(-390,89) 0.14

LowervitaminDstatus 10%† ALSPACMothers 4,710 -4(-7,-2) -26(-54,2) 0.13 -56(-112,1) 0.07

Loweradiponectin 10%† HAPOMothers(GWASonly) 1,376 14(9,18) -1(-9,7) 0.002 4(-9,17) 0.19

*Heterogeneitystatisticsfromthemeta-analysesofobservationalassociationswere:Phet=0.03andI2=67.7%forBMI;Phet=0.09andI2=59.1%forfastingglucose;Phet=0.54andI2=0%forSBP.† For25[OH]Dandadiponectin,wepresenttheestimatedchangeinbirthweightper10%reductioninmaternaltraitlevelbecausethesevariableswereloggedforanalysis.‡P-values<0.05areconsideredtoindicateevidencethatthegeneticeffectsizeestimateisdifferentfromtheobservationalestimate,suggestingthattheobservationalestimateissubjecttoconfoundingorbias.ALSPAC:AvonLongitudinalStudyofParentsAndChildren33;EFSOCH:ExeterFamilyStudyofChildhoodHealth40;HAPO:HyperglycaemiaandAdversePregnancyOutcomes5;SDstandarddeviation

top related