tom lawler tries and fails again fcusa
Post on 02-Jun-2018
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
1/10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
2/10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
3/10
8. For 10 years, Defendant, Thomas John Lawler has successfully operated its
companyFREEDOMFOUNDATION LLC (FFUSA) in all 50states. It has designed a simple
administrative procedure utilizing the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) whereby member
participants are provided a remedy to be compensated for fraudulent bank loans and IRS
payments. Since the US bankruptcy of 1933 and the extraction of Gold and Silver from the
people,"real money" was replacedwith"fiatmoney" throughHJR192by FDR.
9. To support these fiat dollars, each individual'sbirth certificate was pledged as
valueto theworld cestui que trustprovidingeachindividual aCAPITALIZED NAME, as their
beneficiaryname. Thus, whenborrowing froma FederalReserveBank, the alleged borrower's
signature on the promissory note is the banks authorization through the FED to exchange the
notefor the trust "money"giving the illusion the bank had loaned their ownhands. This is the
basisforthe notarial protestprocess.
10. Additionally, the IRS came into existence to collect the interest on the borrowed
"fiat"money by the US govemment by the FED. Since it is unconstitutional to tax income on
wagessince it is not an apportioned tax, the IRS"codes" each filer's master file andcreatesan
offshoreaddressfor them (often Puerto Rico) and changesthe filersoccupation to ATFsales
(Alcohol,Tobacco or Firearms)whichis a taxable offshore occupation. This is thebasisfor the
IRSnotarial protestprocess.
11. Theprocessutilizes a notary who certifies thateachof three notices hasbeensent
tothe respective bank orIRS.Thesenotices detailtypicallythirtyplus offenses committed by the
bankor IRS in their loan creation and collectionschemes.Each notice contains aclaim amount
basedon the amount of monies paid to the institution: for banks principle and interest paid; for
theIRStaxesand fines paid. The notaryfiirthercertifies i fanyresponsesare returnedwithviable
defensesof the challenges presented to them on a point by pointbasis.To date, no bank or IRS
responsehas properly refuted a single item nor the penaltyassessment for compensatory andpunitive damages. Since anunreftitednotice stands as truth, the notary, under the UCC rules
administersa notarial protest creating adefaultjudgmentforthe amount stated in the notice.
12. Since the corporate US Govemment is still i n chapter 11 bankruptcy, the
judgment's claim is then submitted to the US Treasury with supporting documentation for
3
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 3 of 10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
4/10
payment under the bankruptcy. This entire process of the notarial protest and subsequent
payment is referred to in this document as anAdministrativeRemedy (AR).
13. It has takenFREEDOM FOUNDATIONUSA LLC(FFUSA) 9 ofthese 10years
to discover the pathway to paytheseclaims and has been mailing and faxing the US Treasury
Secretary Jack Lew and President Barack Obama repeatedly this last year. Do to the
bureaucracyof the govemmental system, it took support fi-om IMFhead Christine Legarde, UN
Secretary-General,BanKi-Moon and US UN Ambassador, Samantha Power to finally reach the
White House to present ourwinning proposal for Americans. We further understand this has
beensubmitted to the Intemational Common LawWorldCourt for review and approval by the
WhiteHouse.
14. Duringthis developmental periodwith theWhiteHouse and the US Treasury, two
unfortunate events occurred. First, evidence points to a disgrantled contractor with a 9 year
history with FFUSA who was bound by her agreement rules to handle disputes through
Arbitration, sought out the SEC inAfianta,GAwitha sordid tale of untmths and allegations.
Around thissameperiod, as part of the due dihgence regarding our US Treasury submission for
claimpayment byFFUSA,we understand the US Treasury contacted a neutral agency to fiirther
contact theAtlantaSEC for a routine due diligence on the FFUSA operation. It is apparent the
SEC(Plaintiff)mistook the casual inquiryas a negative and added the ranting of thedisgrantied
contractor andperhapsa few others tocreateawitchhunt.
15. The conditions of any member using the FFUSA AR service by contract is there
are"no refunds" and theprocess is done on a"best efforts"basis. This is furtheraffirmedon
every member order that theyagree. The award for each claimcan vary by member currently
between $325,000 and $1,000,000withservice prices ranging from 1000to 10,000. Services
forearly members varied as to the service price and awardlevelover the years, but theprocess
mechanicswere consistent as described above.
16. The Plaintiff, in their overzealous manner took the stories of mismanagement at
facevaluewithouteven one notice oropportunityto validate or dispute any ofitby FFUSAuntil
Thomas John Lawler and Diane Jean Lawler were subpoenaed on short notice on or about
6/20/14and deferred to appearon6/25/14with thePlaintiffrefiisingto provide even one word
on the issue at hand or who said what. This has continued to this day. The "investigation"
4
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 4 of 10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
5/10
involvedevery bank account managed by Defendantswithstrong inferencesofmisuse orthefto f
ftinds. The disgruntled contractor's bank account was also present. No other informationwas
sought.
17. On July 3 Thomas JohnLawlerreceived a phonemessagefromthePlaintiff,Pat
Huddleston advising the SEC wil l be bringing smt against Thomas John Lawler and all
DefendantLLCs and was given 3 minutes to prepare for a phone conference with JudgeAmy
Totenberg and himself. The phone conference ensued withno opportunity to read the lawsuit
nor did itappearJudgeAmy Totenberg had done so. Pat Huddleston announced many of the
charges insinuating the administrativeprocess constituted selling a security and the lack of
fiinding (by the US Treasury) constituted fraud then moved to freeze all bank accounts of
ThomasJohnLawlerand DianeJeanLawler. Thomas JohnLawlercontested this action sighting
every bookwriter or seller of a "how to book"would be selling securities with such a broad
definition. JudgeAmy Totenberg sidedwith the railroading of the Defendants and signed the
TRO freezing all FFUSA and related accounts and most o fVioletBlessings LLC, managed by
Diane Jean Lawler. Additionally, Judge Amy Totenberg ordered the stopping of all AR
administrationsetting a hearingdateofAugust8, 2014 for a fiillhearing.
SUMMARY
18. Plaintiff repeatedly and wrongfully accused Defendant(s) o f engaging in
unregistered offering of securities and fraud, alongwithquoting standardized rhetoric of "the
Securities Act",which has no application or basis in the matter at hand since the offering
Defendant(s) refer to is no more than a simple contract for service and educational process, with
NOpromiseofresuhsother than abestefforts administrativeperformance.Muchlikethat o f any
serviceprovider, there surely is a cost for service performedwhichmay or may not bebasedon
thesumtotaland/orworkperformed.For example, acollectionagency may be paid to collect or
negotiate a sum certain on behalf of another, and whose fee for service may be charged ordeductedand may bebasedon the collectable amount.Wouldthis contract for service be akinto
an "investment" or "security"? Wethinknot. The collectorsimplyperforms a service butdoes
notpromise orguaranteeresults. Nonetheless, the service provider is stillpaid for their service.
The Defendant(s) are in that category as a service provider.
5
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 5 of 10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
6/10
19. So as not torestatea large part or all of the actionfiledbyPlaintiffin the UNITED
STATES DISTRICTCOURT FOR THENORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIAATLA NTA
DIVISION, westatethe true facts and authorities as they apply tothese contracts andprocesses
in question: The Contracts are MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENTS NOT INVESTOR
AGREEMENTS.They include various terms and conditions andCLUBbenefits. One benefit is
the ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY referred to as AR (this being the portion apparently being
misconstruedas the "investment'V'security" part and"fraud").The AR is an educationalprocess
and fee for service with no promise of resuhs or efficacy. A CLUB MEMBER (NOT
INVESTOR) may choosetoengageand in doing so they themselves must provide all true and
correctinformation, includingany amount of monetary remedy they deem as due. Defendant(s)
merelyprovide administrative services that include, and are notlimitedto, thewellknown, long
standing, well defined and lawftiUyutilized, NOTARIAL PROTEST process. NOTARIAL
PROTEST,as defined inBLACK'S LAW DICTIONARYFIRSTEDITION:
"PROTEST.2. A notarial act, being aformal statement
in writingmadeby a notary under hissealo foffice,at
therequestof the holder of abil lor note, inwhich such
billor note is described, and it is declared that thesame
was on a certain day presented for payment, (or
acceptance,as thecasemay be,) and that such payment
or acceptance was refused, and stating the reasons,i f
any, given for such refiisal, whereupon the notaryprotests against all parties to such instrument, and
declaresthat theywi l lbe held responsible for all loss or
damagearisingfrom its dishonor."
20. Since the definitions of "Investment" and "Security" are so broad, the authorities
utilizethesephrases/law as a catch-all whenever convenient, aswellas thewidelyused "Howey
Test",as they used in this matter, again, as a standardized catch-all. The "Howey Test"doesnot
applyas the contracts in question do not meet atleast3o fthe 4 prongs of thetest:There is no 1)
investment money, 2) due to an expectation of profits,since there are none, 3) there is a common
enterpriseobligated to cure the judgmentsprocessed,which is theUnited StatesDepartment of
Treasury and 4) does NOT depend solely on the efforts of a third party but on individual
education, the accuracy ofinformationprovided for administration byeachindividual engaging
in the processbased on same, and The United States Department of Treasury and what they
deemis just and proper ineachindividual instance.
6
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 6 of 10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
7/10
21. In addition, the services and educational process in question, as well as other
CLUBBENEFITS, are availableONLY toCLUB MEMBERSand NOTofferedor available to
thegeneralpublic.One mustchooseto become aCLUB MEMBER (NOT INVESTOR)i n order
to take advantage of any CLUBBENEFITS of their choosing. The CLUB does not offeror
engagein investments or securities.
22. These frozen assets are essential for staff payroll, commissions, rent, phone,
websites,ISPs, etc. to carry on the many otheraspectsof our business. FFUSA is an operation
of 10,000 memberships encompassing about 20,000 people. We need to continue to service
them and complete the fmal fiinding bringing trillions of dollars to a severely struggling
economy. FFUSA'shandshave been severely and unconscionablytiedby this TRO and suit.
23. This TRO and Civil Action No. l:14-CV-2468-AT in the UNITED STATES
DISTRICTCOURTFORTHE NORTHERN DISTRICTOFGEORGIAATLANTA DIVISION
must be terminatedIMMEDIATELY withprejudice.
24. A Papal APOSTOLIC LETTER was issued MOTU PROPRIO, by the Supreme
PontiffFrancis, on M y 11 2013,effectiveSeptember 1, 2013.APOSTOLIC LETTERdeclared
theneed "for the international community to adopt adequate legal instruments toprevent and
counter criminal activities, by promoting international judicial cooperation on criminal
matters". The criminality of crimes against humanity and terrorism cannot be disputed
(EXHIBITA)
25. Plaintiff is being noticed, on the record, of the seriousnessof their actions and the
harmbeing perpetrated on the very people theypurportedlywishto protect and o f the revocation
of their pubhc servant immunities. Said revocation of immunitiesplaces each public servant
personally liable for their ownindividualand collective actions or lack thereof, and the ensuing
actionand penalties fortheir continued disregardofwaming.
26. To date, to thebestof my knowledge,Plaintiffhave failedto resolve this matter
and Defendant(s) have not been made whole requiring immediate and complete settlement and
dismissal of this matter. Plaintiff continues to inflictgreat harm upon Defendant(s) rendering
themunable to conductbusinessindividuallyand severally by and throughPlaintiff(s)TRO and
assetfreeze o f bank accounts, Limited LiabilityCompanies, aswellas causing irrevocable harm
7
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 7 of 10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
8/10
byway ofdefamationof character and slanderous, false allegations results ofwhichmay never
be erased.
(ECONOMIC AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY) .
PURSUANT TO PAPAL APOSTOLIC L E T T E R E F F E C T I V E 1. SEPTEMBER 2013
ISSUED MOTU
27. TheAPOSTOLIC LETTER issued 11 July2013and effectiveas of 1, September
2013clearly puts forththemeansto prevent and counter criminalactivities that threaten human
dignityand the common good andpeace,includingbut notlimited to, economic crimes and other
crimes against humanity as wellas terrorism. In addition, it strips away immunities that pubhc
servantshavelongh id behind and now makes them personally liable for their own personal and
collectiveactions or lack thereof.
28. Crimes Against Humanity is well defmed on an intemationallevel. Intemational
legal precedent is verywell established by and through previous legal actions and ralings too
numerous to count. As an example, one may look to other intemational courts such as the
IntemationalCriminalCourt(ICC) whichwas established as a permanent tribunal(among many
other intemational courts and tribunals) to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against
humanity,war crimes and other crimes.
29. As a direct result ofPlaintiffs actions, Defendant(s) have been subject to financial
devastation, cessation ofabilityto administiativelyassistin curingvalid outstanding judgments
(thereby harming thousands of people) and effectivelymining the excellent reputation,some
very longstanding, ofDefendant(s).Defendant(s) are responsible for creating serious economic
and mental anguish and harm.
TERRORISM)
PURSUANT TO PAPAL APOSTOLIC L E T T E R E F F E C T I V E 1.SEPTEMBER 2013
ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO
30. TheAPOSTOLICLETTER issued 11 July 2013 and effectiveas of 1, September
2013clearly puts forththemeansto prevent and counter criminalactivities that threaten human
dignityand the common good andpeace,includingbut notlimited to, economic and other crimes
8
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 8 of 10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
9/10
againsthumanity as well as terrorism. In addition, it strips away immunities that publicservants
havelong hid behind and nowmakesthem personally liablefortheir own personal and collective
actionsor lack thereof
31. Since 1994, the United Nations General Assembly has repeatedly condemnedterroristactsusing thefollowingpoliticaldescriptionofterrorism:
"Criminalacts intended or calculated to provoke astateof terror in the general
public,a group ofpersonsor particularpersonsfor pohticalpurposesare in any
circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political,
philosophical,ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may
beinvoked tojustifythem."
32. As a direct resuh ofPlaintiff actions, Defendant(s) are subject to severe lossof
businessand otherdamages,and has sufferedseriousfinancial and mental anguish and harm.
R E L I E F
Asa result ofPlaintiffsactions.Defendantseeksthefollowingrelief:
3
3.
An order for dismissalwithprejudice.
34. An order for immediatereleaseofallfrozen funds.
35. An order for compensatory andpunitivedamagesof $100,000.
36.
An order for immediate publication of error and admission ofsamein the court and
published in the public record by way o flocaland national media.
37. Courtfeesand any and allcostsof this action against the Defendants; and,
38. Any other reliefthe courtdeemsjust and proper.
Dated this f dayofAugust,2014.
IslThomas J Lawler
9
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 9 of 10
-
8/10/2019 Tom Lawler Tries and Fails Again FCUSA
10/10
efinitions (as d e f i n e d i no t h e r i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o u r t s ,not
n e c e s s a r i l y common lawc o u r t s , bu t todemonstrateth e use as a
worldwide standard).
Crimes A g a i n s t Humanity-"Crimes a g a i n s t h u m a n i t y " i n c l u d eany o f
t h e f o l l o w i n g a c t s c o m m i t t e dasp a r tof aw i d e s p r e a dor systematic
a t t a c k d i r e c t e d a g a i ns t anyc i v i l i a n p o p u l a t i o n , w i t h knowledgeo f
t h e a t t a c k :
murder;
e x t e r m i n a t i o n ;
e n s l a v e m e n t ;
d e p o r t a t i o no rf o r c i b l e t r a n s f e r o fp o p u l a t i o n ;
i m p r i s o n m e n t ;
t o r t u r e ;
rape, sexual sl ave ry , enforc ed p r o s t i t u t i o n , f o r c e d pregnancy,
e n f o r c e d s t e r i l i z a t i o n , or anyoth er form o fsexual vi ol en ce
o f comparable g r a v i t y ;
p e r s e c u t i o n a g a i n s t ani d e n t i f i a b l e g r o u pon p o l i t i c a l ,
r a c i a l , n a t i o n a l , e t h n i c , c u l t u r a l , r e l i g i o u s orgend er
grounds;
e n f o r c e d d i s a p p e a r a n c eo fperson s;
t h ecrime o fa p a r t h e i d ;
o t h e r inhumane a c t s of a s i m i l a r c h a r a c t er i n t e n t i o n a l l y
c a u s i n g g r e at s u f f e r i n g ors e r i o u s b o d i l y ormental i n j u r y .
T e r r o r i s m - The i n t e r n a t i o n a l communityhasbeen s l o wt of o r m u l a t ea
u n i v e r s a l l y a g r e e d , l e g a l l y b i n d i n g d e f i n i t i o n o ft h i s crime. These
d i f f i c u l t i e s a r i s e f r o m the f a c t t h a t the t er m " t e r r o r i s m "i s
p o l i t i c a l l y ande m o t i o n a l l y charged.
S i n c e 1994, th e Unit ed Nations G e n e r a l Assembly has r e p e a t e d l y
condemned t e r r o r i s t acts using thef o l l o w i n g p o l i t i c a l d e s c r i p t i o n
o f t e r r o r i s m :
" C r i m i n a l acts intended o r c a l c u l a t e dt op r o v o k e a s t a t e
o f t e r r o r i n theg e n e r a l p u b l i c , a g r o u p o f p e r s o n sor
p a r t i c u l a r p e r s o n s f o rp o l i t i c a l p u r p o s e s are i n any
c i r c u m s t a n c e u n j u s t i f i a b l e w h a t e v e r th ec o n s i d e r a t i o n so f
a p o l i t i c a l , p h i l o s o p h i c a l , i d e o l o g i c a l , r a c i a l , e t h n i c ,
r e l i g i o u s or any othe r natu re t h a t may be invoked t o
j u s t i f y them."
We l o o k t o the Common Law I n t e r n a t i o n a l Wor ld Court t ob r o a d e nt he
e x i s t i n g vague d e f i n i t i o n of " t e r r o r i s m " t o i n c l u d e " f i n a n c i a l
t e r r o r i s m . "
2 DEFENDANT S) (Known D e f e n d a n t s ) as l i s t e d i n p a r a g r a p h 2.
h e r e i n )
10
Case 1:14-cv-02468-AT Document 29 Filed 10/10/14 Page 10 of 10
top related