today’s outline - december 02, 2015phys.iit.edu/~segre/phys405/15f/lecture_25.pdf · today’s...

Post on 31-May-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Today’s Outline - December 02, 2015

• Problem requests

Please fill out course evaluation!

Review session by grader & ARC tutor, Johny EcheversThursday, December 3, 2015, 17:00 – 19:00Room 220 Engineering 1 Building

Final Exam:Monday, December 7, 14:00 – 16:00Room 204 Stuart Building

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 1 / 18

Today’s Outline - December 02, 2015

• Problem requests

Please fill out course evaluation!

Review session by grader & ARC tutor, Johny EcheversThursday, December 3, 2015, 17:00 – 19:00Room 220 Engineering 1 Building

Final Exam:Monday, December 7, 14:00 – 16:00Room 204 Stuart Building

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 1 / 18

Today’s Outline - December 02, 2015

• Problem requests

Please fill out course evaluation!

Review session by grader & ARC tutor, Johny EcheversThursday, December 3, 2015, 17:00 – 19:00Room 220 Engineering 1 Building

Final Exam:Monday, December 7, 14:00 – 16:00Room 204 Stuart Building

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 1 / 18

Today’s Outline - December 02, 2015

• Problem requests

Please fill out course evaluation!

Review session by grader & ARC tutor, Johny EcheversThursday, December 3, 2015, 17:00 – 19:00Room 220 Engineering 1 Building

Final Exam:Monday, December 7, 14:00 – 16:00Room 204 Stuart Building

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 1 / 18

Today’s Outline - December 02, 2015

• Problem requests

Please fill out course evaluation!

Review session by grader & ARC tutor, Johny EcheversThursday, December 3, 2015, 17:00 – 19:00Room 220 Engineering 1 Building

Final Exam:Monday, December 7, 14:00 – 16:00Room 204 Stuart Building

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 1 / 18

Problem 3.11

Find the momentum space wave function, Φ(p, t), for a particle in theground state of the harmonic oscillator. What is the probability that ameasurement of p on a particle in this state would yield a value outsidethe classical range?

The ground state of the harmonic oscillator is

Ψ0(x , t) =(mωπ~

)14e−mωx

2/2~e−iωt/2

Φ(p, t) =1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

∫ ∞−∞

e−ipx/~e−mωx2/2~ dx

=1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

√2π~mω

e−p2/2mω~

=

(1

πmω~

)14

e−p2/2mω~e−iωt/2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 2 / 18

Problem 3.11

Find the momentum space wave function, Φ(p, t), for a particle in theground state of the harmonic oscillator. What is the probability that ameasurement of p on a particle in this state would yield a value outsidethe classical range?

The ground state of the harmonic oscillator is

Ψ0(x , t) =(mωπ~

)14e−mωx

2/2~e−iωt/2

Φ(p, t) =1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

∫ ∞−∞

e−ipx/~e−mωx2/2~ dx

=1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

√2π~mω

e−p2/2mω~

=

(1

πmω~

)14

e−p2/2mω~e−iωt/2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 2 / 18

Problem 3.11

Find the momentum space wave function, Φ(p, t), for a particle in theground state of the harmonic oscillator. What is the probability that ameasurement of p on a particle in this state would yield a value outsidethe classical range?

The ground state of the harmonic oscillator is

Ψ0(x , t) =(mωπ~

)14e−mωx

2/2~e−iωt/2

Φ(p, t) =1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

∫ ∞−∞

e−ipx/~e−mωx2/2~ dx

=1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

√2π~mω

e−p2/2mω~

=

(1

πmω~

)14

e−p2/2mω~e−iωt/2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 2 / 18

Problem 3.11

Find the momentum space wave function, Φ(p, t), for a particle in theground state of the harmonic oscillator. What is the probability that ameasurement of p on a particle in this state would yield a value outsidethe classical range?

The ground state of the harmonic oscillator is

Ψ0(x , t) =(mωπ~

)14e−mωx

2/2~e−iωt/2

Φ(p, t) =1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

∫ ∞−∞

e−ipx/~e−mωx2/2~ dx

=1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

√2π~mω

e−p2/2mω~

=

(1

πmω~

)14

e−p2/2mω~e−iωt/2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 2 / 18

Problem 3.11

Find the momentum space wave function, Φ(p, t), for a particle in theground state of the harmonic oscillator. What is the probability that ameasurement of p on a particle in this state would yield a value outsidethe classical range?

The ground state of the harmonic oscillator is

Ψ0(x , t) =(mωπ~

)14e−mωx

2/2~e−iωt/2

Φ(p, t) =1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

∫ ∞−∞

e−ipx/~e−mωx2/2~ dx

=1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

√2π~mω

e−p2/2mω~

=

(1

πmω~

)14

e−p2/2mω~e−iωt/2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 2 / 18

Problem 3.11

Find the momentum space wave function, Φ(p, t), for a particle in theground state of the harmonic oscillator. What is the probability that ameasurement of p on a particle in this state would yield a value outsidethe classical range?

The ground state of the harmonic oscillator is

Ψ0(x , t) =(mωπ~

)14e−mωx

2/2~e−iωt/2

Φ(p, t) =1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

∫ ∞−∞

e−ipx/~e−mωx2/2~ dx

=1√2π~

(mωπ~

)14e−iωt/2

√2π~mω

e−p2/2mω~

=

(1

πmω~

)14

e−p2/2mω~e−iωt/2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 2 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum

p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω

→ p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx

= 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1)

= 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.11 (cont.)

The maximum classical momentum p2

2m= E = 1

2~ω → p =√mω~

the probablity of finding the system outside the maximum classical limits

P =

∫ −√mω~−∞

|Φ|2 dp +

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp = 2

∫ ∞√mω~|Φ|2 dp

= 1− 2

∫ √mω~0

|Φ|2 dp = 1− 2√πmω~

∫ √mω~0

e−p2/mω~ dp

substituting z ≡ p/√mω~ and dp =

√mω~ dz

P = 1− 2√π

∫ 1

0e−z

2dx = 1− erf(1) = 1− 0.843 = 0.16

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 3 / 18

Problem 3.27

An operator A, representing observable A has two normalized eigenstatesψ1 and ψ2, with eigenvalues a1 and a2, respectively. Operator B,representing observable B has two normalized eigenstates φ1 and φ2, witheigenvalues b1 and b2. The eigenstates are related by

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2) ψ2 = 1

5(4φ1 − 3φ2)

(a) Observable A is measured, and the value a1 is obtained. What is thestate of the system immediately after this measurement?

(b) If B is now measured, what are the possible results, and what are theirprobabilities?

(c) Right after the measurement of B, A is measured again. What is theprobability of getting a1?

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 4 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉

= 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉

+ 1625b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 9

25b1 + 1625b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉

= 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.27 – solution

ψ1 = 15(3φ1 + 4φ2)

ψ2 = 15(4φ1 − 3φ2)

φ1 = 15(3ψ1 + 4ψ2)

φ2 = 15(4ψ1 − 3ψ2)

(a) Since the expectation value measured is a1, the system must be in thecorresponding eigenstate ψ1

(b) The probabilities can be obtained by taking the expectation value of Bwith the state ψ1

〈ψ1|Bψ1〉 = 925b1〈φ1|φ1〉+ 16

25b2〈φ2|φ2〉 = 925b1 + 16

25b2

(c) We have to consider two cases just after B is measured

the system is in state φ1 with prob-ablity 9

25 and then we measure

the system is in state φ2 with prob-ablity 16

25 and then we measure

Pa1(φ1) = 925

Pa1(φ2) = 1625

Pa1(total) = 925 ·

925 + 16

25 ·1625

= 337625 = 0.5392

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 5 / 18

Problem 3.32

In an interesting version of the energy-time uncertainty principle∆t = τ/π, where τ is the time it takes Ψ(x , t) to evolve into a stateorthogonal to Ψ(x , 0). Test this out, using a wave function that is an equaladmixture of two orthnormal stationary states of some arbitrary potential:

Ψ(x , 0) =√

12 [ψ1(x) + ψ2(x)]

Assume that the two states have energies E1 and E2, respectively. Thetime dependent wave function is thus

Ψ(x , t) =√

12(ψ1e

−iE1t/~ + ψ2e−iE2t/~)

if we assume that at a time τ this wave function is orthogonal to the wavefunction at t = 0, we can solve for τ by taking the inner product andsetting it to zero

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 6 / 18

Problem 3.32

In an interesting version of the energy-time uncertainty principle∆t = τ/π, where τ is the time it takes Ψ(x , t) to evolve into a stateorthogonal to Ψ(x , 0). Test this out, using a wave function that is an equaladmixture of two orthnormal stationary states of some arbitrary potential:

Ψ(x , 0) =√

12 [ψ1(x) + ψ2(x)]

Assume that the two states have energies E1 and E2, respectively. Thetime dependent wave function is thus

Ψ(x , t) =√

12(ψ1e

−iE1t/~ + ψ2e−iE2t/~)

if we assume that at a time τ this wave function is orthogonal to the wavefunction at t = 0, we can solve for τ by taking the inner product andsetting it to zero

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 6 / 18

Problem 3.32

In an interesting version of the energy-time uncertainty principle∆t = τ/π, where τ is the time it takes Ψ(x , t) to evolve into a stateorthogonal to Ψ(x , 0). Test this out, using a wave function that is an equaladmixture of two orthnormal stationary states of some arbitrary potential:

Ψ(x , 0) =√

12 [ψ1(x) + ψ2(x)]

Assume that the two states have energies E1 and E2, respectively. Thetime dependent wave function is thus

Ψ(x , t) =√

12(ψ1e

−iE1t/~ + ψ2e−iE2t/~)

if we assume that at a time τ this wave function is orthogonal to the wavefunction at t = 0, we can solve for τ by taking the inner product andsetting it to zero

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 6 / 18

Problem 3.32

In an interesting version of the energy-time uncertainty principle∆t = τ/π, where τ is the time it takes Ψ(x , t) to evolve into a stateorthogonal to Ψ(x , 0). Test this out, using a wave function that is an equaladmixture of two orthnormal stationary states of some arbitrary potential:

Ψ(x , 0) =√

12 [ψ1(x) + ψ2(x)]

Assume that the two states have energies E1 and E2, respectively. Thetime dependent wave function is thus

Ψ(x , t) =√

12(ψ1e

−iE1t/~ + ψ2e−iE2t/~)

if we assume that at a time τ this wave function is orthogonal to the wavefunction at t = 0, we can solve for τ by taking the inner product andsetting it to zero

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 6 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)

−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~

= e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ

−→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH

=(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2

−→ ∆t∆E =~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 3.32 (cont.)

0 = 〈Ψ(x , τ)|Ψ(x , 0)〉

=1

2

(e iE1τ/~〈ψ1|ψ1〉+ e iE1τ/~

����〈ψ1|ψ2〉+ e iE2τ/~����〈ψ2|ψ1〉+ e iE2τ/~〈ψ2|ψ2〉

)=

1

2

(e iE1τ/~ + e iE2τ/~

)−→ e iE2τ/~ = −e iE1τ/~

− 1 = e i(E2−E1)τ/~ = e iπ −→ (E2 − E1)τ

~= π

∆t =τ

π=

π~(E2 − E1)

but from problem 3.18, we have that

∆E = σH =(E2 − E1)

2−→ ∆t∆E =

~2

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 7 / 18

Problem 4.38

Consider the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, with potential

V (r) =1

2mω2r2

(a) Show that separation of variables in cartesian coordinates turns thisinto three one-dimensional oscillators, and exploit your knowledge ofthe latter to determine the allowed energies.

(b) Determine the degeneracy d(n) of En.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 8 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(

YZ∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)

+1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(

YZ∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)

+1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(

YZ∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)

+1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(

YZ∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)

+1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2

+ XZ∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)

+1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2

+ XY∂2Z

∂z2

)

+1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)

+1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)

+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)

+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)

the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(a) The Schrodinger equation for a 3D harmonic oscillator is

− ~2

2m

(∂2ψ

∂x2+∂2ψ

∂y2+∂2ψ

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)ψ = Eψ

this can be separated by choosing ψ = X (x)Y (y)Z (z)

E XYZ =− ~2

2m

(YZ

∂2X

∂x2+ XZ

∂2Y

∂y2+ XY

∂2Z

∂z2

)+

1

2mω2

(x2 + y2 + z2

)XYZ

E =

(− ~2

2m

1

X

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Y

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2

)+

(− ~2

2m

1

Z

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2

)the equation is thus separated and can be solved in the usual way

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 9 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

The three separation constants arecalled Ex ,Ey ,Ez and yield three dif-ferent equations to solve.

Each of these three equations is a1D harmonic oscillator with eigen-values

Ex =

(nx +

1

2

)~ω, nx = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ey =

(ny +

1

2

)~ω, ny = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ez =

(nz +

1

2

)~ω, nz = 0, 1, 2, . . .

ExX = − ~2

2m

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2X

EyY = − ~2

2m

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2Y

EzZ = − ~2

2m

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2Z

The total energy is thus

E =

(nx + ny + nz +

3

2

)~ω

=

(n +

3

2

)~ω, n≡nx +ny +nz

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 10 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

The three separation constants arecalled Ex ,Ey ,Ez and yield three dif-ferent equations to solve.

Each of these three equations is a1D harmonic oscillator with eigen-values

Ex =

(nx +

1

2

)~ω, nx = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ey =

(ny +

1

2

)~ω, ny = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ez =

(nz +

1

2

)~ω, nz = 0, 1, 2, . . .

ExX = − ~2

2m

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2X

EyY = − ~2

2m

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2Y

EzZ = − ~2

2m

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2Z

The total energy is thus

E =

(nx + ny + nz +

3

2

)~ω

=

(n +

3

2

)~ω, n≡nx +ny +nz

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 10 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

The three separation constants arecalled Ex ,Ey ,Ez and yield three dif-ferent equations to solve.

Each of these three equations is a1D harmonic oscillator with eigen-values

Ex =

(nx +

1

2

)~ω, nx = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ey =

(ny +

1

2

)~ω, ny = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ez =

(nz +

1

2

)~ω, nz = 0, 1, 2, . . .

ExX = − ~2

2m

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2X

EyY = − ~2

2m

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2Y

EzZ = − ~2

2m

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2Z

The total energy is thus

E =

(nx + ny + nz +

3

2

)~ω

=

(n +

3

2

)~ω, n≡nx +ny +nz

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 10 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

The three separation constants arecalled Ex ,Ey ,Ez and yield three dif-ferent equations to solve.

Each of these three equations is a1D harmonic oscillator with eigen-values

Ex =

(nx +

1

2

)~ω, nx = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ey =

(ny +

1

2

)~ω, ny = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ez =

(nz +

1

2

)~ω, nz = 0, 1, 2, . . .

ExX = − ~2

2m

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2X

EyY = − ~2

2m

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2Y

EzZ = − ~2

2m

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2Z

The total energy is thus

E =

(nx + ny + nz +

3

2

)~ω

=

(n +

3

2

)~ω, n≡nx +ny +nz

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 10 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

The three separation constants arecalled Ex ,Ey ,Ez and yield three dif-ferent equations to solve.

Each of these three equations is a1D harmonic oscillator with eigen-values

Ex =

(nx +

1

2

)~ω, nx = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ey =

(ny +

1

2

)~ω, ny = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ez =

(nz +

1

2

)~ω, nz = 0, 1, 2, . . .

ExX = − ~2

2m

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2X

EyY = − ~2

2m

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2Y

EzZ = − ~2

2m

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2Z

The total energy is thus

E =

(nx + ny + nz +

3

2

)~ω

=

(n +

3

2

)~ω, n≡nx +ny +nz

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 10 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

The three separation constants arecalled Ex ,Ey ,Ez and yield three dif-ferent equations to solve.

Each of these three equations is a1D harmonic oscillator with eigen-values

Ex =

(nx +

1

2

)~ω, nx = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ey =

(ny +

1

2

)~ω, ny = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ez =

(nz +

1

2

)~ω, nz = 0, 1, 2, . . .

ExX = − ~2

2m

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2X

EyY = − ~2

2m

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2Y

EzZ = − ~2

2m

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2Z

The total energy is thus

E =

(nx + ny + nz +

3

2

)~ω

=

(n +

3

2

)~ω, n≡nx +ny +nz

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 10 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

The three separation constants arecalled Ex ,Ey ,Ez and yield three dif-ferent equations to solve.

Each of these three equations is a1D harmonic oscillator with eigen-values

Ex =

(nx +

1

2

)~ω, nx = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ey =

(ny +

1

2

)~ω, ny = 0, 1, 2, . . .

Ez =

(nz +

1

2

)~ω, nz = 0, 1, 2, . . .

ExX = − ~2

2m

∂2X

∂x2+

1

2mω2x2X

EyY = − ~2

2m

∂2Y

∂y2+

1

2mω2y2Y

EzZ = − ~2

2m

∂2Z

∂z2+

1

2mω2z2Z

The total energy is thus

E =

(nx + ny + nz +

3

2

)~ω

=

(n +

3

2

)~ω, n≡nx +ny +nz

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 10 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nz

n 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.38 – solution

(b) The degeneracy is governed by how many ways one can make thesame value of n using the three individual quantum numbers nx , ny , andnz given the constraint n≡nx +ny +nz

approach this by looking atthe first few cases and thenextrapolate

thus the sum of all theseways to make n is

d(n) = 1 + 2 + · · ·+ (n + 1)

=(n + 1)(n + 2)

2

nx ny nzn 0 0 1 way

n-11 0

2 ways0 1

n-22 0

3 ways1 10 2

0

n 0

n+1 waysn − 1 1

· · ·1 n − 10 n

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 11 / 18

Problem 4.2

Use separation of variables in cartesian coordinates to solve the infinitecubical well.

V (x , y , z) =

{0, 0 < x , y , z < a

∞, otherwise

(a) Find the stationary states and the corresponding energies

(b) Call the distince energies E1,E2,E3, . . . , in order of increasing energyand determine the degeneracies of the first 6 states

(c) What is the degeneracy of E14 and why is this case interesting?

(a) The solutions are given by

ψ(x , y , z) =

(1

2

)3/2sin(nxπ

ax)

sin(nyπ

ay)

sin(nzπ

az)

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 12 / 18

Problem 4.2

Use separation of variables in cartesian coordinates to solve the infinitecubical well.

V (x , y , z) =

{0, 0 < x , y , z < a

∞, otherwise

(a) Find the stationary states and the corresponding energies

(b) Call the distince energies E1,E2,E3, . . . , in order of increasing energyand determine the degeneracies of the first 6 states

(c) What is the degeneracy of E14 and why is this case interesting?

(a) The solutions are given by

ψ(x , y , z) =

(1

2

)3/2sin(nxπ

ax)

sin(nyπ

ay)

sin(nzπ

az)

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 12 / 18

Problem 4.2

Use separation of variables in cartesian coordinates to solve the infinitecubical well.

V (x , y , z) =

{0, 0 < x , y , z < a

∞, otherwise

(a) Find the stationary states and the corresponding energies

(b) Call the distince energies E1,E2,E3, . . . , in order of increasing energyand determine the degeneracies of the first 6 states

(c) What is the degeneracy of E14 and why is this case interesting?

(a) The solutions are given by

ψ(x , y , z) =

(1

2

)3/2sin(nxπ

ax)

sin(nyπ

ay)

sin(nzπ

az)

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 12 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z)

=~2

2m

π2

a2N

, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z)

=~2

2m

π2

a2N

, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

The energies are thus

E =~2

2m

π2

a2(n2x + n2y + n2z) =

~2

2m

π2

a2N, nx , ny , nz = 1, 2, 3, . . .

(b) We can now enumerate the different states and their degeneracies

nx ny nz N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2

2 1 16 31 2 1

1 1 2

E3

2 2 19 32 1 2

1 2 2

E4

3 1 111 31 3 1

1 1 3

nx ny nz N d

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6

3 2 1

14 6

1 3 22 3 13 1 22 3 11 2 3

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 13 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 4.2 (cont.)

(c) The next 7 states and their associatedN’s and degeneracies are

for E14, however, there are two integercombinations which give the same valueof N = 27, namely

(3 3 3) with d = 1

(5 1 1) with d = 3

for a total degeneracy of 4

N d

E1 1 1 1 3 1

E2 2 1 1 6 3

E3 2 2 1 9 3

E4 3 1 1 11 3

E5 2 2 2 12 1

E6 3 2 1 14 6

E7 3 2 2 17 3

E8 4 1 1 18 3

E9 3 3 1 19 3

E10 4 2 1 21 6

E11 3 3 2 22 3

E12 4 2 2 24 3

E13 4 3 1 26 6

E143 3 3

27 45 1 1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 14 / 18

Problem 5.10

Qualitatively discuss the energy level scheme for helium if (a) electronswere spin 1

2 bosons, and (b) spin 12 distinguishable particles

(a) Bosons

the ground state is spatially symmetricand so must have a symmetric (triplet)spin state and be orthohelium

the excited states come both in ortho(triplet) and para (singlet) form and theformer have symmetric spatial functionswhile the latter have antisymmetric spa-tial function

because all orthohelium states have spa-tially symmetric functions, they will havehigher energies than the parahelium states

(b) Distinguishable particles

every state has both orthoand para configurations andare therefore quadruply de-generate since the spatiallysymmetric and antisymmet-ric functions can be associ-ated with any spin state.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 15 / 18

Problem 5.10

Qualitatively discuss the energy level scheme for helium if (a) electronswere spin 1

2 bosons, and (b) spin 12 distinguishable particles

(a) Bosons

the ground state is spatially symmetricand so must have a symmetric (triplet)spin state and be orthohelium

the excited states come both in ortho(triplet) and para (singlet) form and theformer have symmetric spatial functionswhile the latter have antisymmetric spa-tial function

because all orthohelium states have spa-tially symmetric functions, they will havehigher energies than the parahelium states

(b) Distinguishable particles

every state has both orthoand para configurations andare therefore quadruply de-generate since the spatiallysymmetric and antisymmet-ric functions can be associ-ated with any spin state.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 15 / 18

Problem 5.10

Qualitatively discuss the energy level scheme for helium if (a) electronswere spin 1

2 bosons, and (b) spin 12 distinguishable particles

(a) Bosons

the ground state is spatially symmetricand so must have a symmetric (triplet)spin state and be orthohelium

the excited states come both in ortho(triplet) and para (singlet) form and theformer have symmetric spatial functionswhile the latter have antisymmetric spa-tial function

because all orthohelium states have spa-tially symmetric functions, they will havehigher energies than the parahelium states

(b) Distinguishable particles

every state has both orthoand para configurations andare therefore quadruply de-generate since the spatiallysymmetric and antisymmet-ric functions can be associ-ated with any spin state.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 15 / 18

Problem 5.10

Qualitatively discuss the energy level scheme for helium if (a) electronswere spin 1

2 bosons, and (b) spin 12 distinguishable particles

(a) Bosons

the ground state is spatially symmetricand so must have a symmetric (triplet)spin state and be orthohelium

the excited states come both in ortho(triplet) and para (singlet) form and theformer have symmetric spatial functionswhile the latter have antisymmetric spa-tial function

because all orthohelium states have spa-tially symmetric functions, they will havehigher energies than the parahelium states

(b) Distinguishable particles

every state has both orthoand para configurations andare therefore quadruply de-generate since the spatiallysymmetric and antisymmet-ric functions can be associ-ated with any spin state.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 15 / 18

Problem 5.10

Qualitatively discuss the energy level scheme for helium if (a) electronswere spin 1

2 bosons, and (b) spin 12 distinguishable particles

(a) Bosons

the ground state is spatially symmetricand so must have a symmetric (triplet)spin state and be orthohelium

the excited states come both in ortho(triplet) and para (singlet) form and theformer have symmetric spatial functionswhile the latter have antisymmetric spa-tial function

because all orthohelium states have spa-tially symmetric functions, they will havehigher energies than the parahelium states

(b) Distinguishable particles

every state has both orthoand para configurations andare therefore quadruply de-generate since the spatiallysymmetric and antisymmet-ric functions can be associ-ated with any spin state.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 15 / 18

Problem 5.10

Qualitatively discuss the energy level scheme for helium if (a) electronswere spin 1

2 bosons, and (b) spin 12 distinguishable particles

(a) Bosons

the ground state is spatially symmetricand so must have a symmetric (triplet)spin state and be orthohelium

the excited states come both in ortho(triplet) and para (singlet) form and theformer have symmetric spatial functionswhile the latter have antisymmetric spa-tial function

because all orthohelium states have spa-tially symmetric functions, they will havehigher energies than the parahelium states

(b) Distinguishable particles

every state has both orthoand para configurations andare therefore quadruply de-generate since the spatiallysymmetric and antisymmet-ric functions can be associ-ated with any spin state.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 15 / 18

Problem 5.10

Qualitatively discuss the energy level scheme for helium if (a) electronswere spin 1

2 bosons, and (b) spin 12 distinguishable particles

(a) Bosons

the ground state is spatially symmetricand so must have a symmetric (triplet)spin state and be orthohelium

the excited states come both in ortho(triplet) and para (singlet) form and theformer have symmetric spatial functionswhile the latter have antisymmetric spa-tial function

because all orthohelium states have spa-tially symmetric functions, they will havehigher energies than the parahelium states

(b) Distinguishable particles

every state has both orthoand para configurations andare therefore quadruply de-generate since the spatiallysymmetric and antisymmet-ric functions can be associ-ated with any spin state.

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 15 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)

kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk

=~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F

=k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq

=3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ

=3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 5.15

Find the average energy per free electron (Etot/Nq), as a fraction of theFermi energy

For the free electron gas, the Fermienergy is defined by the filled oc-tant of the sphere in reciprocalspace

the energy in one octant of a shellof radius k is given by

so the total energy can be com-puted

1

8

(4

3πk3F

)=

Nq

2

(π3

V

)kF = (3ρπ2)1/3, ρ ≡ Nq

V

EF =~2k2F2m

=~2

2m(3ρπ2)2/3

dE =~2k2

2m

V

π2k2 dk

Etot =~2V

2π2m

∫ kF

0k4 dk =

~2k5FV10π2m

Etot/Nq

EF=

~2k5FV10π2m

1

Nq

2m

~2k2F=

k3FV

5π2Nq=

3ρπ2

5π2ρ=

3

5

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 16 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrix

representation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~ 0 00 0 00 0 − ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrix

representation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~ 0 00 0 00 0 − ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrixrepresentation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~ 0 00 0 00 0 − ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrix

representation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~ 0 00 0 00 0 − ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrix

representation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~

0 0

0

0 0

0

0 − ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrix

representation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~ 0

0

0 0

0

0 0

− ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrix

representation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~ 0 00 0 00 0 − ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31

Construct the spin matrices (Sx , Sy , and Sz) for a particle of spin 1.

With spin 1, there are three possible values of m: -1, 0, 1 which meansthat we have spin eigenstates as follows

χ+ =

100

, χ0 =

010

, χ− =

001

Since these spinors are eigenstates of Sz , we can construct the matrix

representation of the operator as follows:

Szχ+ = ~χ+

Szχ0 = 0

Szχ− = −~χ−

Sz =

~ 0 00 0 00 0 − ~

= ~

1 0 00 0 00 0 −1

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 17 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =

√2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =

√2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 1

2(S+ + S−) and Sy = 12i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =

√2~

0

1 0

0

0 1

0

0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =

√2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 1

2(S+ + S−) and Sy = 12i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1

0

0 0

1

0 0

0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =

√2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 1

2(S+ + S−) and Sy = 12i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =

√2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 1

2(S+ + S−) and Sy = 12i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =

√2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 12(S+ + S−) and Sy = 1

2i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =√

2~

0

0 0

1

0 0

0

1 0

finally, use Sx = 12(S+ + S−) and Sy = 1

2i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =√

2~

0 0

0

1 0

0

0 1

0

finally, use Sx = 12(S+ + S−) and Sy = 1

2i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =√

2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 12(S+ + S−) and Sy = 1

2i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =√

2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 1

2(S+ + S−) and Sy = 12i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =√

2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 1

2(S+ + S−) and Sy = 12i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

Problem 4.31 (cont.)

Now build the raising and lowering operators

S+χ+ = 0

S+χ0 = ~√

2χ+

S+χ− = ~√

2χ0

S+ =√

2~

0 1 00 0 10 0 0

S−χ+ = ~√

2χ0

S−χ0 = ~√

2χ−

S−χ− = 0

S− =√

2~

0 0 01 0 00 1 0

finally, use Sx = 1

2(S+ + S−) and Sy = 12i (S+ − S−)

Sx =~√2

0 1 01 0 10 1 0

Sy =i~√

2

0 −1 01 0 −10 1 0

C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 405 - Fall 2015 December 02, 2015 18 / 18

top related