thematic analysis of focus groups with consumers and
Post on 16-Apr-2022
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Thematic Analysis of Focus
Groups With Consumers and
Carers of Mental Illness
© 2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
This PDF has been generated from SAGE Research Methods Datasets.
Thematic Analysis of Focus
Groups With Consumers and
Carers of Mental Illness
Student Guide
Introduction
There are many types of qualitative research methodologies, such as interviews,
case studies and autoethnographies (Creswell & Poth, 2018). The type selected
for this dataset is focus groups, and the exemplar draws from one focus group
transcript. The purpose here is to describe the approach that was taken to theming
the transcript, as well as the writing up of findings as a narrative. By taking
stock of the factors that influenced the approach, other researchers such as
PhD students can develop awareness, knowledge, skills, and ownership of the
processes involved in qualitative data analysis.
The dataset exemplar has been drawn from a national study conducted in
2010–2011 on the needs and experiences of consumers and carers of mental
illness. It was funded by beyondblue, a not-for-profit organization in Australia
aimed at increasing awareness of, and reducing the stigma around, mental illness.
Briefly, the study conducted eight focus groups in urban and regional sites across
four of Australia’s eight states and territories to ensure the sample was nationally
representative. The total sample size was 61. Focus groups were comprised of
6–8 people and were in-depth, varying from 2 to 2.5 hours. Participants were
reimbursed AUD$100 as a sign of appreciation for sharing their time and
vulnerable experiences.
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 2 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
Focus Groups
Focus groups are one common way of collecting data in qualitative research
(Babbie, 2016). They (like all qualitative methods) are chosen because the needs
and experiences of participants are valued more than a ‘tick in the box’; such
quantitative surveys and questionnaires reduce richness by measuring needs
and experiences on a linear scale. Thus, there is fundamental value for the
participant’s voice, and it is collected within a philosophical paradigm that values
the non-quantifiable whole. Researchers who choose qualitative methods typically
endorse emic or ‘insider’ perspectives (Denzin & Lincoln, 2017), and thus holistic
person-centeredness. This helps put power in the participants’ hands and, in
doing so, helps the researcher be responsible for and ethical with their own power
(e.g., someone with access to postgraduate education and prestigious institutional
symbols such as their university and funding bodies).
In addition to epistemological factors, there may also be a practical element to the
choice of a focus group: having many people share their needs and experiences
together saves time, compared to gathering data in one-on-one interviews. Given
that an Honours program only goes for one year, for example, being able to collect
data quickly does matter. If there is more luxury, for example, in a three-year
PhD, then this factor may not play as large a role when deciding on the most
appropriate qualitative research methodology (interviews or focus groups), given
the research questions being investigated. Indeed, the research questions have a
huge bearing on the data collection method. If a topic is simply too sensitive, then
focus groups are not appropriate; their practicality does not justify or outweigh
the need to create a safe space for participants to share their thoughts, feelings,
and experiences. Both focus groups and interviews allow researchers to identify
similarities and differences across participants, but which is eventually decided
upon depends on what is best for the participant, whose voice is so greatly valued.
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 3 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
If focus groups are selected, then having a group size no greater than eight is
ideal (Babbie, 2016). This is because people vary in the extent to which they feel
comfortable to share their thoughts, feelings, and experiences with people who
are likely to be strangers to them. In turn, it can risk some participants dominating
the discussion and others being marginalized. A smaller group size of six to eight
makes it easier to manage such group dynamics, while still gathering a diverse
range of individualized and nuanced voices.
Data Exemplar: Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
To provide a bit more information about the project: beyondblue is Australia’s
leading non-government organization in mental health awareness. They
commissioned the Social Policy Research Centre (SPRC) at the University of New
South Wales (UNSW) in September 2010 to conduct focus group research with
consumers and carers. beyondblue defines consumers as people with personal
experience of depression, anxiety and related substance use disorders, and
carers as family members and friends who care for consumers. The study aimed
to explore four key themes in relation to mental health issues (identified by
beyondblue when they commissioned the research) – community awareness,
stigma, social and economic impacts, and treatment needs – as the basis for
developing national practice and policy recommendations. The study lasted for six
months and involved several tasks.
The first task was to obtain ethics approval from UNSW’s Human Research
Ethics Committee (HREC). A literature and beyondblue document review was
then conducted to help establish current knowledge in the field about the four key
themes. Findings of the review informed the design of three semi-structured focus
group schedules (with non-leading questions and prompts). Each schedule was
for the three types of focus groups that were going to be conducted – ‘consumers
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 4 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
only’, ‘carers only’, and ‘mixed groups of consumers and/or carers’. beyondblue
then recruited participants through their e-based national consumer and carer
reference group, ‘blueVoices’. Potential participants living in the local area of the
eight study sites were first screened and then excluded if they had additional
presentations of psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder,
etc.). These criteria were used to increase sample homogeneity and therefore
representativeness. Eight focus groups were then conducted in Melbourne (urban
Victoria), Bendigo (regional Victoria), Hobart (urban Tasmania), Burnie (regional
Tasmania), Sydney (urban New South Wales), Tamworth (regional New South
Wales), Adelaide (urban South Australia), and Mount Gambier (regional South
Australia). Permission to record the focus groups was sought prior to conducting
them (at the same time as obtaining informed written consent). After all the focus
groups had been conducted, the voice files were sent to a private company for
transcription. The transcripts were then deidentified and thematically analysed,
and the findings were written up in a final report to beyondblue in 2011 (Sawrikar,
Muir, & Craig, 2011) and in peer-reviewed journal article in 2017 (Sawrikar & Muir,
2017).
In total, 61 participants took part, which is large for qualitative research. Of these,
32 (52.5%) were ‘consumers only’, 24 (39.3%) were ‘carers only’, and five (8.2%)
were ‘consumers and carers’. The age range was 17–78 years, with an average of
43.1 years (n = 60 complete data), and 23 (37.8%) participants were male. More
details about the participants can be found in the original report (Sawrikar et al.,
2011).
Thematic Analysis
In this paper, thematic analysis is treated as a two-step process. It first involves
identifying broad or key themes that are emerging from the data (‘coding’), and
then offering deeper meanings about them (‘narrative’). However, it is common
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 5 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
for qualitative researchers to distinguish between ‘content analysis’ and ‘thematic
analysis’ and, therefore, separate these two steps as independent rather than
sequential. This can cause confusion in terminology!
According to Vaismoradi, Turunen, and Bondas (2013), content analysis is defined
as a “systematic coding and categorising approach for exploring large amounts
of textual information unobtrusively to determine trends and patterns of words
used, their frequency, their relationships, and the structures and discourses of
communication” (p. 400). It is distinguished from thematic analysis, which they
define as “an independent method for identifying, analysing and reporting patterns
(themes) within data” (Vaismoradi, Turunen, & Bondas, 2013, p. 400).
Although these related terms are used interchangeably, there is a basic distinction
between description and analysis being made. Below is a further discussion
about the importance of both when making sense of qualitative data. Thereafter,
explanation about the approach taken to thematically analysing Extract 1 is
provided.
Coding
Only two small extracts of one focus group transcript have been provided here.
This is because the original transcript of this focus group is 66 pages in length.
When you have conducted eight focus groups, there is a lot of data to churn
through. As a researcher, it is critical that all issues raised across those 500
odd pages is documented in some way. It is ethical – honouring the sharing of
your participants, but it is also rigorous – ensuring that themes have been fully
scoped for. NVivo is software that can help researchers manage all their data,
but is not necessary to use because it does not do the thinking for them; it is an
organizational tool, not an analytical one.
It is also ideal if there are several coders working through the transcripts to
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 6 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
identify all key and sub-themes. However, this comes down to resourcing. If
there are funds available for a team of researchers, then usually one transcript
is chosen for analysis first. All coders work on it independently to help establish
the degree of overlap among them (also known as ‘inter-rater reliability’). It is then
discussed together to help finalize the approach the team will take: identifying,
cross-referencing, and validating the ‘coding framework’. The remaining
transcripts are then equally divided by the number of researchers in the team.
Such an approach helps ensure both consistency and efficiency during this stage
of data analysis.
Importantly, the initial coding framework that is designed is not fixed. It is iteratively
modified and adapted as each transcript is analysed and discussed – adding,
deleting, and re-prioritizing themes as required. This is critical for ensuring that
analysis is fluid and responsive to the data. Indeed, the literature review which
then informs the questions asked on the focus group schedules already indicates
to a researcher key and possible sub-themes, but the dynamic process of
speaking with people uncovers and creates new knowledge which also needs to
be captured. Thinking about the experiences that people share also develops,
matures, ripens, and sophisticates over time. Thus, qualitative data analysis
is a back-and-forth process: researchers start with some idea about the key
issues, but those ideas also grow and expand; re-writing how they may have first
understood some phenomena.
Narrative
In the process of thematic analysis, the first step of coding may also be referred
to as ‘content analysis’. Essentially, it is aiming to exhaust all the data that have
arisen from the focus groups, but is only descriptive at this stage. Good writing
does not simply describe what has been found. It analyses it, giving it deep
meaning that reflects the researchers’ privileged position of having had access
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 7 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
to so many people’s thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Thus, fully coding a
transcript is not all there is to be done as a researcher analysing qualitative data.
Once the descriptive step of identifying all key and sub-themes has occurred,
another important factor comes into play: page limits play a critical role in helping
researchers decide how to present all that data. In an Honours or PhD
dissertation, an appendix can help carry the load, but in a journal article, the skill
of a writer to be both comprehensive and succinct is truly tested. The work also
needs to be interesting. For example, identifying every quote that sounds similar
across participants is too repetitive for a marker or reader. Instead, it is better to
provide an exemplar quote that best demonstrates the point one is trying to make
and then provide some text in a paragraph that describes and summarizes all the
data relevant to that theme.
Those paragraphs also need to be joined together by the writer’s voice, so that
an analytical ‘story’ is unfolding as it is read. This narrative logically links the key
and sub-themes, and makes clear and explicit to the reader why they are each
important and how they are each related. It is critical that a scholarly writer says
exactly what they mean and mean exactly what they say. Ambiguity in study logic,
design, execution, and analysis compromises the very purpose of research – to
find well-considered evidence for a well-considered argument – and writing is the
means by which all of this is shown. A PhD marker or reviewer of a journal article
will be looking for ambiguity that compromises methodological rigour, and it is
the writer’s job to address it as much as possible. Ideally, the analytical narrative
that the researcher is creating is progressing the field; the findings should be
discussed in a way that leads to new knowledge, not just state what is already
known. The researcher is a powerful agent, and the deeper they think about their
findings, the richer their contributions to the field will be.
Approach for Extract 1
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 8 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
Extract 1 is from the introductory discussion of the ‘mixed carers and/or
consumers’ focus group in Bendigo (and should be read in full now, so that the
remainder of this section makes sense). Its key purpose was to help establish
rapport within the group quickly, so that participants felt comfortable talking and
sharing with people they did not necessarily know. However, several themes
were identified even at this early stage (e.g., work as a form of carer respite,
family attitudes towards medication, and resilience among consumers). Before a
qualitative researcher discusses these themes, they need to provide contextual
descriptive information about who took part in their study.
Descriptive Sample Data
Some of the first things a researcher would need to note are the number of male,
female, and total participants in the focus group(s). There may also be other
characteristics that are relevant and require reporting. For example, in this study,
a short demographics survey was completed by participants at the end of the
focus group, collecting data on variables such as age, country of birth, and use of
mental health services (each of these were described in the commissioned report
for beyondblue).
Each characteristic of the sample would need some discussion, so that it was
not just descriptive. For example, if there was no sample representativeness
in gender, why? In this study, 38% of the sample were male, so discussion
about their lower participation was required. The report attributed it to gendered
sociocultural expectations about males not being free to discuss their feelings and
having to be strong (and there were data in the focus groups to support this). It
may also be helpful to provide cross-tabulations in the write-up of a qualitative
study, such as the number of male and female participants per focus group. Such
decisions – on how much or how little summary data to present – need to be
made, and should be guided by whether they add to/aid in contextualizing the
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 9 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
findings.
Mental Health Issues
One important and obvious sample characteristic relevant to this study and
therefore warranting summary is the number and range of mental health issues
that participants are living with. A frequency table would be useful for this purpose
(and accordingly was provided in the commissioned report to beyondblue).
Textual information that goes beyond description would also be helpful. For
example, upon reading Extract 1, it appears that carers of people with postnatal
depression were relatively common in this focus group, and this may be worth
noting if the researcher believes that the caring experience is influenced by the
type of mental illness the consumer has. Thus, they may explore and reflect on the
similarities and differences between carers of people with postnatal depression,
bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and any other mental health issues reported
in the sample. Such a reflection would be part of their narrative, when they move
from the broad code/theme of ‘the caring experience being related to the type of
mental illness they live with’ to the deeper meanings of exactly in what ways and
why.
Family Characteristics
Demographic characteristics not collected in a short survey after the focus group
may also emerge as themes during the discussion. For example, length of caring,
number of consumers in the household, and family structures were raised by
participants in this group: reported length of caring varied from two to 30 years,
there may be one or several consumers within a household (and whether they are
child, partner, or parent consumers is also important to identify), and some were
in a single-parent household.
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 10 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
Importantly, participants may mention such family characteristics but not
necessarily go on to explicitly state how they affect their caring experience. By
drawing on all data from all focus groups, qualitative researchers can deeply
explore whether and how these family characteristics influence the caring
experience, and thus offer reasonable and cogent theories about their possible
relationship. When they do this, however, it is critical that this is made clear –
calling for caution to be exercised and future research to be conducted with more
rigorous methodologies, because the speculative relationships being offered are
not wholly based on the evidence collected in the study.
Respite
Once the researcher has fully described their sample in relation to all relevant
variables, they can then move onto thematic analysis. Work being a form of
respite from caring was raised as one theme in this early discussion. It was also
discussed in more depth later when the specific issue of social and economic
impacts of mental illness within families was explored. Thus, all verbatim quotes
across all transcripts that relate to work as a form of respite would need to be
pulled together, so that they can be summarized succinctly and comprehensively.
For example, how many people mentioned this or agreed with this by nodding?
Whose quote best demonstrates the point, even though several people have
said it? Did anyone report work not being a form of respite and why? In your
reasonable and logical opinion, do people’s thoughts, feelings, and experiences
relate to anything about their demographic profile (e.g. age, sex, cultural
background, family structure, urban/regional residence, etc.)?
Work was not the only form of respite identified by carers. For example, across
all eight focus groups, respite was evidenced through self-care, sharing caring
with others when possible, using humour as a coping strategy, having faith or
hope, and taking up government-funded respite services (these data have not
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 11 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
been provided here). Thus, the key theme would be identified as respite and
the various examples of it could be classified as sub-themes. Each sub-theme
requires analytical discussion, perhaps by drawing on previous literature to help
compare and contrast study findings to what has already been reported. This
way, the Results section is not just a descriptive list of findings. Importantly, what
one researcher sees as a theme, another may see as a sub-theme; conceptually
seeing it as belonging under a broader ‘umbrella’. As long as a logical justification
is provided, such differences are acceptable (and indeed in keeping with
qualitative inquiry, are valued).
Other Themes
From reading all of Extract 1, it can be seen that several themes were raised by
participants, such as experiences with medication, caring stress, and resilience
among consumers (e.g., founding and facilitating support groups). A similar
process to what has already been described above – pooling all data that relates
to each theme, analysing it deeply including variation among participants, and
writing it up succinctly – would need to occur for all key and sub-themes across all
transcripts until they had been identified and exhausted.
Ethical Writing
There is a final point in need of mention from Extract 1. The burden of caring can
be so great that one participant did say, “You only get 10 years for murder”. That
the group laughed in response to this statement is further evidence of the burden
of caring; it is empathically shared by other carers. However, such a statement
may be confronting for people who are not carers, including consumers.
Nevertheless, and in line with qualitative methodologies that value person-
centredness, it is critical that the researcher reports this sentiment in a way that
does not judge it, but instead honours it as a feeling that was shared due to the
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 12 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
safe space created by the researcher. Research is conducted in the pursuit of
truth, and focus groups are one way of collecting evidence of that truth. Thus, this
sentiment is truth for the carer, and it is critical that this truth be written up ethically
by the researcher in a narrative that pulls together the privilege of hearing many
truths.
Take-Home Messages
To help summarize the key points of this paper about focus groups and thematic
analysis of focus group transcripts, the following ‘take-home messages’ are
offered:
• Practicing thematic analysis improves awareness, knowledge, skills, and
ownership of the processes involved in qualitative data analysis; it
develops, matures, ripens, and sophisticates over time.
• Both focus groups and interviews allow a qualitative researcher to identify
similarities and differences among participants. However, which method is
used depends on the research questions of the study and what is best
for the participant(s) (some questions are better explored in a one-on-one
setting and/or are psychologically safer).
• Focus groups with six to eight people is an ideal sample size; it allows
diverse experiences to be captured while managing potential dominant
participants.
• Qualitative researchers sometimes use terminology differently to one
another, which can cause confusion. It is therefore important for them to
define and explain their choices.
• Good writing up of qualitative research values both description and
analysis; neither is compromised.
• All emergent themes and sub-themes are exhausted to ensure that data
analysis is both rigorous and ethical.
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 13 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
• NVivo is software used to help manage qualitative data; it is not relied upon
for analytic purposes.
• Pending resources, checking the inter-relater reliability of one’s coding
framework boosts its rigour. The coding framework is also finalized only
after all transcripts have been themed, to allow the data analysis process to
remain fluid and responsive to the entire dataset.
• Qualitative researchers should aim to write their findings up theoretically,
logically, succinctly, comprehensively, clearly, unambiguously, interestingly,
empathically, ethically, and usefully.
• Qualitative researchers must quickly establish that the focus group is a safe
place for all participants to share their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
Setting up initial ‘house rules’ about the importance of respect and
confidentiality can aid in this endeavour.
• A write-up of qualitative research first requires descriptive information about
the sample in relation to all relevant variables, before moving onto thematic
analysis. Summary data should not be redundant; it should be provided if it
is seen to help contextualize the themes and sub-themes to be discussed
later. Where appropriate, sample characteristics should be analysed for
whether the sample is representative.
• Qualitative researchers are expected to deeply explore and offer underlying
meanings and relationships. As such, they are subjective and speculative
by nature. Cogent theories informed by previous literature where possible
should be offered, but caution should also be called for.
• A concept map may help qualitative researchers visually explain how and
why they differentiate a key theme from a sub-theme.
• A qualitative researcher is aware of their power and uses it ethically;
honouring other people’s truths and helping effect change for vulnerable
and/or marginalized people where possible.
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 14 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
Reflective Questions
Extract 2 is from the discussion on the first broad theme of community awareness
of mental illness. It overlaps with the discussion on the second broad theme of
stigma surrounding mental illness. It is for this reason that focus group schedules
are typically semi-structured. If a discussion has naturally touched on a question
one intends to ask later, it could be skipped. Keeping in mind that it is challenging
to reflect on qualitative data that is not meaningful to the qualitative researcher,
read Extract 2 and consider the following reflective questions to help identify your
own approach to analysing the dataset.
1. What do you identify as the key themes?
2. What do you identify as the sub-themes within each key theme?
3. Are you satisfied that you have exhausted all key and sub-themes, and
why?
4. Are there any summary tables you might create from the qualitative
data?
5. How would you write up one of the key themes you have identified in a
paragraph that is both descriptive and analytical and progresses the
field in a way that is interesting, comprehensive, and succinct for a
reader?
Further Reading
Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Boston, MA:
Cengage Learning.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and the research design:
Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative
research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 15 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
Sawrikar, P., & Muir, K. (2017). Toward a family-oriented treatment approach for
consumers and carers of mental illness. International Journal of Mental Health,
47(2), 15–183. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2017.1367448
Sawrikar, P., Muir, K., & Craig, L. (2011). Focus group research for beyondblue
with consumers and carers. (Final Report prepared for beyondblue).
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and
thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.
Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/
nhs.12048
SAGE
2019 SAGE Publications, Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
SAGE Research Methods Datasets Part
2
Page 16 of 16 Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups With Consumers and Carers of Mental
Illness
top related