the vertical farm
Post on 18-May-2015
1.147 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Working Paper
The Vertical Farm: Growing Eco-Cities Dickson Despommier
Currently, over 800 million hectares are committed to some form of
agriculture; this represents about 38% of the total landmass of the earth. Over the
last 10,000 years of human history, farming has increasingly rearranged the
landscape in favor of cultivated fields and herds of cattle at the expense of natural
ecozones, reducing most of them to fragmented, semi-‐functional units and
completely eliminating others. This incursion has had significant costs in terms of
both human and ecological health. On the human side, the transmission of a wide
variety of infectious agents—influenza, rabies, yellow fever, dengue fever, malaria,
trypanosomiasis, hookworm, schistosomiasis—occurs with relentless and
devastating regularity at the tropical and sub-‐tropical agricultural interface and
emerging infections, many of which are viral zoonoses (e.g., Ebola, Lassa fever),
rapidly adapt to the human host following human encroachment into natural
environments. Exposure to toxic levels of some classes of agrochemicals (pesticides,
fungicides) and trauma are two other significant health risks associated with
traditional agricultural practices. On the ecological side, farming consumes huge
quantities of fossil fuels in the developed world. In the United States, alone, over
20% of all the fossil fuel consumed is used for agriculture. This of course translates
into ever increasing levels of greenhouse gasses. Both of these human and ecological
costs are likely to grow more severe as the human population is expected to rise to
at least 8.6 billion over the next 40 years. This growth will require the support of an
additional 109 hectares (roughly the size of Brazil), using current technologies. That
DRAFT
Working Paper
quantity of farmland is no longer available and so these increases will have to be
supplied in part by more intensive, and potentially more environmentally degrading
practices. And even if farming on this scale were not itself energy intensive or
environmentally depleting, the cleared land necessary would still hamper one of our
best and most economical ways to slow the rapidity of climate change: re-‐
forestation.
[INSERT FIGURE 1]
It is clear that we need a solution to the entire problem, not just to the food
and agriculture part. But how can we supply 10 billion people with adequate food
and water and still repair the environment? In my view, if just 50-‐60% of traditional
farming could be replaced by constructing urban food production centers, then a
long-‐term benefit would be the gradual repair of many of the world’s damaged
ecosystems through the systematic abandonment of farmland. This is already
happening in places where agriculture has failed, particularly in the northeastern
region of the United States. In the Midwest, large tracts of land in Minnesota and
Wisconsin are being abandoned. We need to see these vacated lands not simply as
empty sites but as sites of active recovery. Ecological repair is what nature is best at,
so a hands-‐off policy actually works, and in most cases, within a very short time
frame. An excellent example is the de-‐militarized zone between North and South
Korea. No one has stepped into it since 1953 and it is the most verdant portion of
either country. The dust bowl of the 1930s has come back to a tall and mixed grass
prairie. Even Chernobyl has recovered its biodiversity, again due to human
abandonment of the area. The restoration of natural balance in even those
DRAFT
Working Paper
environments most traumatized by humans indicates the effectiveness of
abandonment as an ecological strategy. But if we are to both abandon areas
currently in use and conserve those lands not already under cultivation, our
agricultural operations will need to be located in places already of relatively high
density. Our farms, this is to say, will need to share land with our cities.
[INSERT FIGURE 2]
A vertical farm is one possible solution to sustainable urban agriculture. In
addition to reducing the diseases transmitted at the agricultural interface and
sparing uncultivated land the encroachment of agricultural operations, raising crops
in high-‐rise buildings has a number of advantages over traditional farming. Crops
are protected from adverse weather conditions (floods, droughts, etc.), greatly
regularizing the supply and quality of produce. Year-‐round production is possible,
thus reducing greatly the space required to raise large quantities of produce. Indoor
farming employing hydroponics and aeroponics consumes orders of magnitudes
less water (70-‐80% less) than conventional outdoor farming, conserving a vital
resource for which there is no substitute and whose supply is likely to be an issue
dominating political and ecological decisions in future decades. New job
opportunities will result from the establishing of vertical farms as inner cities are
able to diversify their economies in a hitherto inconceivable direction and
abandoned and degraded city properties are reclaimed and given new value.
[INSERT FIGURE 3a AND 3b]
Vertical farming is still a virtual concept, but its success will be due to its
imitation of nature. All biological material will be re-‐cycled to greatly reduce greatly
DRAFT
Working Paper
or completely eliminate waste. Degradation of plant and animal waste into energy
by some high-‐tech incineration or gasification process could make the urban high-‐
rise farm completely independent of the energy grid. Urban farming in tall buildings
also solves the global problem of agricultural runoff, currently the number one
source of pollution worldwide. In addition, some city farms could be used just to
produce bio-‐fuels or to remediate gray water (de-‐watered sludge). The vertical farm
will bio-‐remediate gray and black water sources, allowing for the re-‐cycling of
potable water back into the community. The safe use of human feces and urine as a
starting source for energy generation further reduces the chances of transmission of
pathogens that depend upon the fecal-‐oral route. Vertical farming will require little
in the way of cutting-‐edge engineering technologies, with the possible exception of
the need for new chemically-‐defined plant foods for specific crops. Virtually any
commercially viable crop can be grown indoors, including numerous animal species.
[INSERT FIGURE 4]
Social acceptance of vertical farms will be one of its greatest challenges, but if
community ownership can be incorporated into the business plan, then the social
and psychological barriers to its implementation can be overcome, allowing for a
potentially radical reshaping of society. The old image of “down on the farm” will
take on a whole new meaning, with urban farm buildings finally living up to the
public’s expectations as to what really constitutes “green” architecture! The ultimate
goal is of course to live as one natural species among all the rest without insuring
the wrath of nature due to encroachment into ecosystems that we do not control.
DRAFT
Working Paper
The city ecosystem we create will have the ability to live within its means and thus
allow all the other ecosystems to do the same.
DRAFT
Working Paper
18. The Vertical Farm: Growing Eco-Cities Dickson Despommier
Figures
Figure 1. The demilitarized zone between North and South Korea
Figure 2. Chernobyl, Ukraine
DRAFT
Working Paper
Figure 3a. Rendering of the southern façade of the Center for Urban Agriculture by Mithun
Figure 3b. Rendering of the northern façade of the Center for Urban Agriculture by Mithun
DRAFT
Working Paper
Figure 4. Axonometric section of La Tour Vivante by SOA Atelier
DRAFT
Working Paper
DRAFT
top related