the reading comprehension of narrative text of the ... · mahzumi, ulya. 2013. “pemahaman membaca...
Post on 25-Sep-2020
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
i
THE READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT OF THE
ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA N 1 GEBOG IN ACADEMIC
YEAR 2013/2014 TAUGHT BY USING SUMMARIZATION TECHNIQUE
By
ULYA MAHZUMI
NIM 200932227
DEPARTEMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2013
ii
iii
THE READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT OF THE
ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA N 1 GEBOG
IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014
TAUGHT BY USING SUMMARIZATION TECHNIQUE
SKRIPSI
Presented to the University of Muria Kudus
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Completing the Sarjana
Program
in English Education
By
ULYA MAHZUMI
NIM 200932227
DEPARTEMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2013
iv
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
MOTTO
“Dan bahwa seseorang akan mendapat hasil dari usahanya sendiri. Dan
bahwa (hasil) usahanya itu akan diperlihatkan.” (S. An-Najm:39-40)
Success is journey, not a destination
Experience is the best teacher
You can’t have a better tomorrow if you are thinking about yesterday all
the time. (charles F. Kettering)
If you can imagine it you can create it. If you can dream it, you can
become it. (William Arthur Ward)
DEDICATION
This skripsi is dedicated to:
Her beloved mother
and father
Her sister and brother
Her big family
Her friendships
Her beloved one for
the future
v
vi
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thanks to Allah SWT. that gives the writer the best blessing in the writing
process of this final project entitled “The Reading Comprehension of Narrative
Text of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic Year
2013/2014 Taught by Using Summarization Technique”. So, she can finish
writing the skripsi.
In completing this research the writer realized would not be able to
complete this skripsi without great support, advice, and ancouragement from other
people. Therefore, the writer would like to express her sincerest gratitude to those
who are directly or indirectly involved in the completion of this skripsi:
finished this skripsi, she would like her gratitude to:
1. Dr. Slamet Utomo, M.Pd the Dean of Teacher Training and Education
Faculty of Muria Kudus University.
2. Diah Kurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd the Head of English Education Department.
3. Fajar Kartika, SS, M.Hum as the first advisor who always gives correction
and suggestion in writing this skripsi.
4. Dr. H.A. Hilal Madjdi, M.Pd as the second advisor who always gives best
support, contributive criticism, and motivation for the writer.
5. All of the lecturers who taught the writer during studying at the faculty as
well as possible.
6. Supriyono, S.Pd, M.Pd the Headmaster of SMA N 1 Gebog who gives
permission to do this research.
viii
7. All of the teachers in SMA N Gebog , especially the English teacher Mr.
Sugiyanto, S.Pd.
8. All of the eleventh grade students of SMA N 1 Gebog in academic year 2013/
2014.
9. Especially her beloved parents Mr. Sutardi, BA (Alm) and Mrs. Murwati, her
brother Fahmi and sister Fitri, her niece Hany for their love, pray, and
support.
10. Her friends are Devi, Fridiya, Nita, Dian and all friends for their supports.
The writer hopes that this study will give useful significances to the
readers, especially for the students of English Education Department, Teacher
Training and Education Faculty University of Muria Kudus.
ix
ABSTRACT
Mahzumi, Ulya. 2013. “The Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text of the
Eleventh Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic Year
2013/2014 Taught by Using Summarization Technique”. Skripsi.
Department of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and
Education, University of Muria Kudus. Advisor (i) Fajar Kartika, SS,
M.Hum. (ii) Dr. H.A. Hilal Madjdi, M.Pd.
Key words: Reading comprehension, narrative text, summarization technique
Corcerning with school-Based Curriculum (KTSP), teaching English in
SMA is expected to achieve informational level because the students are prepared
to continue their study in University and they have to able to receive knowledge
by using language competence. Reading is one of the language skills which has
important roles for the students in enriching their knowledge and adding more
experience. However, many students get difficulties in reading comprehension. In
teaching process, teacher has to choose appropriate technique with the student’s
condition in order to that the aim of teaching learning process can be raised.
Summarization is one of teaching technique that can be used in teaching reading
to develop the students reading skill. The summarizing techniques obviously have
effects on students’ reading comprehension especially in cases of finding the main
ideas, committing plagiarism and committing distortion. In this research, the
writer focuses on narrative text as the material.
The objective of this research is to test the significane of the difference
between the Reading Comprehension of Narrative text of the Eleventh Grade
Students of SMA Negeri 1 Gebog in the academic year 2013/2014 taught before
and after using Summarization Technique.
This research is an experimental research. The population of this research is
the eleventh grade students of SMA N 1 Gebog in academic year 2013/ 2014
consist of twenty eight students. Because only twenty eight students, all of them
takes as the subject. The research instrument used by the researcher is test. The
form of the test is multiple choices and consists of twenty five items.
Based on the analyzing the data, it was found that of the reading
comprehension of the eleventh grade students of SMA N 1 Gebog in academic
year 2013/ 2014 after being taught by using summarization technique was
categorized good. The mean is 80.71, and the standard deviation is 6.75.
Meanwhile of the reading comprehension of the eleventh grade students of SMA
N 1 Gebog in academic year 2013/ 2014 before being taught by using
summarization technique was categorized sufficient. The mean is 65.85 and
standard deviation is 7.56. Moreover the calculation of t-observation (to) 9.01 was
higher than t-table (tt) 2.06 in level of significance 5%. It means there is
significance difference between the reading comprehension of the eleventh grade
x
students of SMA N 1 Gebog in academic year 2013/ 2014 before and after being
taught by using summarization technique.
Based on the result above, the researcher suggests that the English teacher is
expected can use summarization technique as an alternative technique to teach the
students in reading comprehension.
xi
ABSTRAKSI
Mahzumi, Ulya. 2013. “Pemahaman Membaca Teks Narrative Para Siswa Kelas
XI SMA N 1 Gebog Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014 yang Diajar
Menggunakan Teknik Meringkas. Skripsi”. Program Studi Pendidikan
Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, Universitas
Muria Kudus. Dosen Pembimbing (i) Fajar Kartika, SS, M.Hum. (ii)
Dr. H.A. Hilal Madjdi, M.Pd.
Kata kunci: Pemahaman membaca, teks naratif, tehnik meringkas
Berdasarkan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP), pengajaran
Bahasa Inggris di SMA diharapkan mencapai level informasi karena para siswa
disiapkan untuk melanjutkan pendidikan mereka di Universitas dan mereka harus
dapat menerima pengetahuan dengan menngunakan kemampuan berbahasa.
Membaca adalah salah satu kemampuan bahasa yang memiliki peran penting
untuk memperkaya pengetahua mereka dan menambah pengalaman.
Bagaimanapun, banyak siswa mengalami kesulitan dalam pemahaman membaca.
Di dalam proses pengajaran, guru harus memilih teknik yang sesuai dengan
kondisi para siswa sehingga tujuan proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran dapat
tercapai. Teknik meringkas adalah salah satu teknik penajaran yang dapat
digunakan dalam pengajaran membaca untuk mengembangkan kemampuan
membaca para siswa. Teknik meringkas memiliki efek pada pemahaman bacaan
siswa terutama dalam kasus untuk menemukan gagasan utama, melakukan
plagiarisme dan melakukan distorsi. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan
teks narratif sebagai materi.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan yang signifikan
antara pemahaman membaca teks naratif para siswa kelas XI SMA N 1 Gebog
tahun ajaran 2013/2014 sebelum dan sesudah diajar menggunakan teknik
meringkas.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian ekperiment. Populasi dari penelitian di
kelas XI.IPA SMA N 1 Gebog 2013/ 2014 yang terdiri dari 28 siswa. Karena
hanya 28 siswa, seluruh siswa di ambil untuk di jadikan subjek. Alat penelitian
yang digunakan penuli sadalah test. Bentuk test berupa pilihan ganda yang terdiri
dari 25 soal.
Berdasarkan data analisis, telah ditemukan bahwa pemahaman membaca
teks naratif siswa kelas XI SMA N 1 Gebog tahun ajaran 2013/ 2014 setelah
diajar menggunakan teknik meringkas dikategorikan Baik. Nilai rata-rata adalah
80,71 dan standar deviasi adalah 6,75. Sementara pemahaman membaca teks
naratif kelas XI SMA N 1 Gebog tahun ajaran 2013/ 2014 sebelum diajar
menggunakan teknik meringkas dikategorikan cukup. Nilai rata-rata adalah 65,85
xii
dan standar deviasi adalah 7,56. Perhitungan t-observation (to) 9.01 lebih tinggi
dari t-table (tt) 2,06 dengan tingkat signifikan 5%. Ini bermakna bahwa ada
perbedaan yang signifikan antara pemahaman membaca teks naratif kelas XI
SMA N 1 Gebog tahun ajaran 2013/ 2014 sebelum dan sesudah diajar
menggunakan tehnik meringkas.
Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, peneliti memberi saran agar guru bahasa inggris
dapat menggunakan teknik meringkas sebagai teknik alternatif untuk mengajar
pemahaman membaca para siswa.
xiii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
COVER……………………………………………………………………… i
LOGO……...………………………………………………………………… ii
TITLE………………………………………………………………………… iii
MOTO AND DEDICATION………………………………………………... iv
ADVISORS’ APPROVAL …………………………………………………. v
EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL………………………………………………… vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT…………………………………………………… vii
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………….. ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………...... xiii
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………… xvi
LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………….. xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES…….………………………………………………. xviii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Research ............................................................... 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem ..................................................................... 3
1.3 Objective of the Research .................................................................... 3
1.4 Significance of the Research ................................................................ 4
1.5 Scope of the Research .......................................................................... 5
1.6 Operational Definition .......................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESIS
2.1 Teaching English at SMA N 1 Gebog ................................................. 7
2.1.1 The Curriculum of Teaching English at SMA N 1 Gebog ................. 8
2.1.2 The Purpose of Teaching English at SMA N 1 Gebog ....................... 9
2.1.3 The Material of Teaching English at SMA N 1 Gebog ...................... 10
2.2 Reading Comprehension ..................................................................... 10
xiv
2.2.1 Definition of Reading .......................................................................... 11
2.2.2 Level of Comprehension ..................................................................... 12
2.2.3 Purpose of Reading .............................................................................. 13
2.3 Narrative Text ..................................................................................... 14
2.3.1 Definition of Narrative text ................................................................. 15
2.3.2 Generic Structure of Narrative Text ..................................................... 15
2.3.3 Significant Grammatical Features ........................................................ 16
2.4 Summarization as a Technique ........................................................... 16
2.4.1 Purpose of Summarization Technique ............................................... 18
2.4.2 Procedure of Summarization Technique ............................................. 19
2.5 Review of Previous Research .............................................................. 20
2.6 Theoretical Framework ...................................................................... 21
2.7 Hypothesis ............................................................................................ 21
CHAPTER III METHOD OF THE RESEARCH
3.1 Design of the Research ........................................................................ 22
3.2 Population and sample ........................................................................ 24
3.3 Instrument of the Research ................................................................... 25
3.3.1 Validity ................................................................................................ 25
3.3.2 Reliability ............................................................................................ 26
3.4 Data Collection ..................................................................................... 27
3.5 Data Analysis ...................................................................................... 28
xv
CHAPTER IV FINDING OF THE RESEARCH
4.1 Finding of the Research …………………………………………… ... 32
4.1.1 The Reading Comprehension Test of Narrative Text Test of the Eleventh
Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic Year 2013/2014
Before being Taught by Using Summarization Technique ................. 33
4. I.2 The Reading Comprehension Test of Narrative Text Test of the Eleventh
Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic Year 2013/2014
After being Taught by Using Summarization Technique ................... 35
4.2 Hypothesis Testing ............................................................................... 38
CHAPTER V DISCUSSION
5.1 Significant Difference between the Reading Comprehension of
Narrative Text of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in
Academic Year 2013/2014 Taught by Using Summarization
Technique…………………………………………………………….. 42
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
6.1 Conclusion …………………………………………………………… 44
6.2 Suggestions ………………………………………………………….. 44
BIBLIOGRAPHY …………………………………………………………. 46
APPENDICES ………………………………………………………….. 48
CURRICULUM VITAE ............................................................................... 150
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix
Syllabus ........................................................................................................................ 49
Lesson Plan 1 ............................................................................................................... 52
Lesson Plan 2 ............................................................................................................... 56
Lesson Plan 3 ............................................................................................................... 62
Lesson Plan 4 ............................................................................................................... 68
The Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text of SMA N 1 Gebog in
Academic Year 2013/2014 (try out) ............................................................................ 75
The score of Try Out of XI. Bahasa in Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................ 82
The table of Try Out Result by XI.Bahasa of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic
Year 2013/2014 ............................................................................................................ 83
The Calculation of Reliability of try Out Test..................................... ........................ 85
Students’ List................................................................................................................87
The Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic
Year 2013/2014 (pre test).............................................................................................88
The Score of pre Test of Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text of the Eleventh
Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic year 2013/2014...........................95
The Tabulation for Calculation Mean and Standard Deviation the Reading
Comprehension Test of Narrative Text of the Eleventh Grade Students of
Page
xvii
SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic Year 2013/2014 before being Taught by
Using Summarization Technique ................................................................................ 115
The Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text of SMA N 1 Gebog in
Academic Year 2013/2014 (post test) .......................................................................... 117
The Score of Post Test of The Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text
the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic Year
2013/2014 .................................................................................................................... 124
The Tabulation for Calculation Mean and Standard Deviation the Reading
Comprehension test of Narrative Text of the Eleventh Grade Students of
SMA N 1 Gebog in Academic Year 2013/2014 after being Taught by Using
Summarization Technique ........................................................................................... 144
The Tabulation of Calculation T-test the Reading Comprehension of
Narrative Text of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA N 1 Gebog in
Academic Year 2013/2014 ........................................................................................... 146
The Value of T-table for Any Number Degree of Freedom ........................................ 147
Documentation ............................................................................................................. 149
top related