the modification of instinctive behavior chapter 3
Post on 21-Dec-2015
240 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Instinctive Systems
Lorenz & Tinbergen – evolution occurs when a species incorporates environmental knowledge into its genetic structure. Greylag goose and egg-rolling.
Learning can sometimes modify instinctive behavior – even though the fixed action patterns are innate.
Energy Model
Action-specific energy builds up but is blocked (inhibited).
The energy motivates appetitive (approach) behavior.
Presence of a sign stimulus releases the energy by stimulating an innate releasing mechanism.
The behavior occurs as a fixed action pattern (or chain of actions).
Releasing Signs
Releasing signs can be complex: Grayling butterfly signs include
darkness of female, distance from male, and pattern of movement.
Intensity of the sign influences the behavior but so does the amount of accumulated energy (time since the last response).
Hierarchical System
Specific behaviors are controlled by a central instinctive system.
Energy can accumulate at each level in the system. Hormones generate energy.
Release of energy at higher levels flows to lower levels.
The sign stimulus determines which behavior will occur.
Conflicting Motives
If two incompatible signs appear at the same time, energy flows to a third instinct system.
This third behavior is called displacement.
Conditioning Affects Behavior
Conditioning experiences can change sensitivity to releasing signs. Only the consummatory response
(eating, mating) at the end of a chain cannot be changed.
Conditioning fine tunes the response to the environment and enhances survival.
Criticisms of the Energy Model
Best viewed as a metaphor. The brain does not literally
accumulate energy in any centers and nothing flows.
Willows & Hoyle – alternating contractions in sea slug allow it to escape from a starfish. Brain areas producing this response do
not correspond to energy model.
Acquired Changes in Response
Habituation – response to a repeated stimulus decreases with experience.
Sensitization – response to a repeated stimulus increases with experience.
Examples: Ingestional neophobia, fear of new food Startle response
Experimental Evidence
Rats drink little saccharin water at first but increase over time.
Loud tones (110 db) produce different responses depending on the background noise (60 vs 80 db). Habituation occurred at 60 db Sensitization occurred at 80 db A loud background is arousing, leading
to greater reactivity, not less.
Conditions Producing Change
More intense (stronger) stimuli produce stronger sensitization, less likely to produce habituation.
Greater sensitization and habituation occur when the stimulus is repeated frequently.
Changes in the stimulus prevent habituation. Turkeys habituate but respond again if
the shape changes.
Conditions (Cont.)
Sensitization can occur to many kinds of stimuli but habituation occurs only with innate responses.
Habituation and sensitization are transient (go away after seconds or minutes between stimuli). Except long-term habituation.
Dishabituation – response returns when a sensitizing stimulus occurs.
Dual Process Theory
Groves & Thompson suggest that sensitization originates in the central nervous system. Drugs that stimulate the CNS increase
readiness to respond. Garcia suggests that the ability to
modify innate reactions has considerable adaptiveness.
Evolutionary Theory
Eisenstein et al. suggest that this is a fine-tuning of sensory stimuli to recognize important stimuli. Habituation & sensitization are non-
associative forms of learning. Their function is to modify sensory
thresholds to adjust to environment. High responders & low responders
adjust in different ways to same stimulus.
Cellular Modification Theory
Aplysia – California sea slug Learning can permanently alter the
functioning of neural systems. The change takes place at the
synapse of the neurons. Stimulation by an external stimulus
produces the change.
Dishabituation
Habituation disappears when the environmental stimulus changes.
In the aplysia, the neural status may return to the previous condition.
An alternative view is that sensitization occurs to modify the responding. The mechanism remains unclear.
Opponent-Process Theory
An explanation for addictions. All experiences produce an affective
reaction (pleasant or unpleasant) – called the A state.
This reaction gives rise to its opposite – called the B state. B state is less intense and lasts longer.
Over time, the A state diminishes and the B state increases.
The Addiction Process
Tolerance – diminished A state. Withdrawal – increased B state. Addictive behavior is a coping
response to the change in B state. People try to enhance A state to offset
the unpleasantness of the B state. Without withdrawal symptoms there is
no addictive behavior. Time prevents B state strengthening.
What Sustains Addiction?
The B state is a non-specific aversive feeling. Anything similarly aversive will
motivate the addictive behavior, even if it has no relation to the substance.
Daily life stress produces a B state that results in behavior to create an A state.
Parachute jumpers – create a B state in order to feel the A state.
top related