the inverse regional ocean modeling system:

Post on 30-Dec-2015

32 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System: Development and Application to Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H. Arango, B. Chua, B. D. Cornuelle , A. J. Miller and Bennett A. Goals. A brief overview of the Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System:

Development and Application to Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies.

Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H. Arango, B. Chua, B. D. Cornuelle , A. J. Miller and Bennett A.

• A brief overview of the Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System

• How do we assimilate data using the ROMS set of models

• Examples, (a) zonal baroclinic jet and (b) mesoscale eddies in the Southern California Current

Goals

Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System (IROMS)

Chua and Bennett (2001)

Inverse Ocean Modeling System (IOMs)

Moore et al. (2003)

NL-ROMS, TL-ROMS, REP-ROMS, AD-ROMS

To implement a representer-based generalized inverse method to solve weak constraint data assimilation into a non-linear model

a 4D-variational data assimilation system for high-resolution basin-wide and coastal oceanic flows

N ttt

¶= +

¶+eu F

u( ) ( ) ( )

( ) (( ) ( ) )B BN t tt

¶= + - ++

¶uuA F eu

uB

B

N¶º

¶u

Au

def:NL-ROMS:

REP-ROMS:

also referred to as Picard Iterations

( )( ) ( )n

B BnN t

= + - +¶

A uuu Fu

n ®u u

Approximation of NONLINEAR DYNAMICS

do =1n ® ¥

enddo

1B

n-ºu u

(STEP 1)

( ) (( ) ( ) )B BN t tt

¶= + - ++

¶uuA F eu

uREP-ROMS: BB

B

N¶º

= -

u

Au

s u u

def:

Representer Tangent Linear Model

( )tt

¶=

¶+

sAs e

T

λ

TL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

( ) (( ) ( ) )B BN t tt

¶= + - ++

¶uuA F eu

uREP-ROMS: BB

B

N¶º

= -

u

Au

s u u

def:

Representer Tangent Linear Model

Perturbation Tangent Linear Model

Adjoint Model

( )tt

¶=

¶+

sAs e

T

λ

TL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

( ) (( ) ( ) )B BN t tt

¶= + - ++

¶uuA F eu

uREP-ROMS:

( )tt

¶= +

¶s

As e

T

λ

TL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

( ) (( ) ( ) )B BN t tt

¶= + - + +

¶uuA F eu

uREP-ROMS:

Small Errors 1) model missing

dynamics

2) boundary conditions errors

3) Initial conditions errors

(STEP 2)

( )tt

¶= +

¶s

As eTL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

REP-ROMS:

T

λ

( )( ) ( ) ( )B BN t tt

¶= + - + +

¶u

u A u u F e

( )tt

¶= +

¶s

As eTL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

REP-ROMS:

T

λ

( )( ) ( ) ( )B BN t tt

¶= + - + +

¶u

u A u u F e

Integral Solutions

( ) ( , ) ( ) ( (', ) ') '0

0 0

Nt

Nt

NN t tt t t ttt d= +ò R es R s …..

( )tt

¶= +

¶s

As eTL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

REP-ROMS:

T

λ

( )( ) ( ) ( )B BN t tt

¶= + - + +

¶u

u A u u F e

Tangent Linear Propagator

Integral Solutions

( ) ( ) (( , ')( ' ') , )0

0 0

Nt

NN Nt

t t dtt t tt t= +òR R es s …..

( )tt

¶= +

¶s

As eTL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

REP-ROMS:

T

λ

( )( ) ( ) ( )B BN t tt

¶= + - + +

¶u

u A u u F e

( ) ( ) (( , ')( ' ') , )0

0 0

Nt

NN Nt

t t dtt t tt t= +òR R es s

Tangent Linear Propagator

Integral Solutions

TL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

REP-ROMS:

T

λ

( )( ) ( ) ( )B BN t tt

¶= + - + +

¶u

u A u u F e

( ) ( ) (( , ')( ' ') , )0

0 0

Nt

NN Nt

t t dtt t tt t= +òR R es s

Integral Solutions

( ) ( )( , ) ( ', () ) '0

0 00

NT TN

t

Nt

t t tt t t t dt= +òR R fλ λ

( )tt

¶= +

¶s

As e

Adjoint Propagator

TL-ROMS:

AD-ROMS:

REP-ROMS:

( ) ( ) (( , ')( ' ') , )0

0 0

Nt

NN Nt

t t dtt t tt t= +òR R es s

Integral Solutions

( ) ( )( , ) ( ', () ) '0

0 00

NT TN

t

Nt

t t tt t t t dt= +òR R fλ λ

[ ]( , ) ( ', )( ) ( ( ')) ( ) ( ') '0

00

N

N N

t

N Bt

t t N t dtt t t t t= + + +òR eu u FR u

Adjoint Propagator

Tangent Linear Propagator

TL-ROMS:

( ) ( , ) ( ) ( ', ) ( ') '0

0 0

Nt

N N Nt

t t t t t t t dt= +òs R s R e

How is the tangent linear model useful for assimilation?

TL-ROMS:

( , ) ( ) ( ', ) '( () ')0

0 0

Nt

N NNt

t t t t t t dtt = +òR s R es

ASSIMILATION (1) Problem Statement

®d1) Set of observations

2) Model trajectory

3) Find that minimizes

( )t®u

Sampling functional

ˆ ( )tu ˆ ( )( ') '0

T

ttt dt® - ò ud H

TL-ROMS:

( , ) ( ) ( ', ) '( () ')0

0 0

Nt

N NNt

t t t t t t dtt = +òR s R es

(ˆ ( )) ()tt t= +u u sBest Model Estimate

Initial Guess Corrections

ASSIMILATION (1) Problem Statement

®d1) Set of observations

2) Model trajectory

3) Find that minimizes

( )t®u

Sampling functional

ˆ ( )tu ˆ ( )( ') '0

T

ttt dt® - ò ud H

TL-ROMS:

ˆ®d1) Initial model-data misfit

2) Model Tangent Linear trajectory

3) Find that minimizes

( )t® s

( , ) ( ) ( ', ) '( () ')0

0 0

Nt

N NNt

t t t t t t dtt = +òR s R es

( )ts (ˆ ( )) '' '0

T

ttt dt® - ò H sd

ASSIMILATION (2) Modeling the Corrections

(ˆ ( )) ()tt t= +u u sBest Model Estimate

Initial Guess Corrections

TL-ROMS:

( , ) ( ) ( ') )'( ( , ) '0

0 0

Nt

N NNt

t tt dtt ttt= +ò R es R s

ASSIMILATION (2) Modeling the Corrections

(( )() )0 000 t ttt = - =e es

( )t® s

( )ts (ˆ ( )) '' '0

T

ttt dt® - ò H sd

ˆ®d1) Initial model-data misfit

2) Model Tangent Linear trajectory

3) Find that minimizes

TL-ROMS:

ASSIMILATION (2) Modeling the Corrections

( )0te

( )te

Corrections to initial conditions

Corrections to model dynamics and boundary conditions

( , ) ( ) ( ') )'( ( , ) '0

0 0

Nt

N NNt

t tt dtt ttt= +ò R es R s

( )t® s

( )ts (ˆ ( )) '' '0

T

ttt dt® - ò H sd

ˆ®d

(( )() )0 000 t ttt = - =e es

1) Initial model-data misfit

2) Model Tangent Linear trajectory

3) Find that minimizes

ˆ®d1) Initial model-data misfit

2) Corrections to Model State

3) Find that minimizes

( )t®e'

ˆ ( ') ( ' ', ( '' ' ' ')')0 0

T t

t ttt t t dt dt® - ò òd H R e

ASSIMILATION (2) Modeling the Corrections

( )0te

( )te

Corrections to initial conditions

Corrections to model dynamics and boundary conditions

( )te

ˆ®d1) Initial model-data misfit

2) Correction to Model Initial Guess

3) Find that minimizes

( )0t®e

ˆ ( ' () , ') ')(0

0 0

T

tt t t t dt® - ò H R ed

ASSIMILATION (2) Modeling the Corrections

( )0te

( )te

Corrections to initial conditions

Corrections to model dynamics and boundary conditions

( )0te

Assume we seek to correct only the initial conditions

STRONG CONSTRAINT

ASSIMILATION (2) Modeling the Corrections

ASSIMILATION (3) Cost Function

ˆ®d1) Initial model-data misfit

2) Correction to Model Initial Guess

3) Find that minimizes

( )0t®e

ˆ ( ' () , ') ')(0

0 0

T

tt t t t dt® - ò H R ed( )0te

ˆ ˆ[ ] ( ') ( , ') ' ( ') ( , ') '0 0

0 0 00 01

TT T

t tJ t t t dt t t t dt-é ù é ù

= - -ê ú ê úê ú ê úë û ë ûò òe e eH R RCd d Hε

10 0T -+ Pe e

ASSIMILATION (2) Modeling the Corrections

ASSIMILATION (3) Cost Function

ˆ®d1) Initial model-data misfit

2) Correction to Model Initial Guess

3) Find that minimizes

( )0t®e

ˆ ( ' () , ') ')(0

0 0

T

tt t t t dt® - ò H R ed( )0te

2) corrections should not exceed our assumptions about the errors in model initial condition.

1) corrections should reduce misfit within observational error

ˆ ˆ[ ] ( ') ( , ') ' ( ') ( , ') '0 0

0 0 00 01

TT T

t tJ t t t dt t t t dt-é ù é ù

= - -ê ú ê úê ú ê úë û ë ûò òe e eH R RCd d Hε

10 0T -+ Pe e

ASSIMILATION (3) Cost Function

ˆ ˆ[ ] ( ') ( , ') ' ( ') ( , ') '0 0

0 0 00 01

TT T

t tJ t t t dt t t t dt-é ù é ù

= - -ê ú ê úê ú ê úë û ë ûò òe e eH R RCd d Hε

10 0T -+ Pe e

ASSIMILATION (3) Cost Function

( ') ( , ') ' ( ') ( , 'ˆ[ ] 'ˆ )0 0

0 0 001

0

T T

t t

T

t t t dt t t t dtJ -é ù é ù= - -ê ú ê ú

ê ú ê úë û ë ûò òe e eH R RCd Hdε

10 0T -+ Pe e

( ') ( , ') '0

0

T

tt t t dt=òG H R

def:

G is a mapping matrix of dimensions

observations X model space

ASSIMILATION (3) Cost Function

ˆ ˆ[ ] ( ') ( , ') ' ( ') ( , ') '0 0

10 0 0 0 0

TT T

t tJ t t t dt t t t dt-é ù é ù

= - -ê ú ê úê ú ê úë û ë ûò òe d H R e C d H R eε

10 0T -+e P e

( ') ( , ') '0

0

T

tt t t dt=òG H R

def:

G is a mapping matrix of dimensions

observations X model space

ˆ ˆ[ ] 1 10 0 0 0 0

TTJ - -é ù é ù= - - +ê ú ê úë û ë ûd dC Pe eG eGe eε

ASSIMILATION (3) Cost Function

ˆ ˆ[ ] ( ') ( , ') ' ( ') ( , ') '0 0

10 0 0 0 0

TT T

t tJ t t t dt t t t dt-é ù é ù

= - -ê ú ê úê ú ê úë û ë ûò òe d H R e C d H R eε

10 0T -+e P e

ˆ ˆ[ ] 1 10 0 0 0 0

TTJ - -é ù é ù= - - +ê ú ê úë û ë ûd dC Pe eG eGe eε

( ) ˆ

ˆ

1 10

1 0T T - - -+ - =G G G CeP dC

H14444444244444443

Minimize J

( ) ˆ

ˆ

1 10

1 0T T - - -+ - =G G G CeP dC

H14444444244444443

4DVAR inversion

Hessian Matrix

( ') ( , ') '0

0

T

tt t t dt=òG H R

def:

( ) ˆ

ˆ

1 10

1 0T T - - -+ - =G G G CeP dC

H14444444244444443

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ0

1

n

T T

-+ =dGP CG eGP

P β14444442444444314444244443

4DVAR inversion

IOM representer-based inversion

Hessian Matrix

( ') ( , ') '0

0

T

tt t t dt=òG H R

def:

( ) ˆ

ˆ

1 10

1 0T T - - -+ - =G G G CeP dC

H14444444244444443

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ0

1

n

T T

-+ =dGP CG eGP

P β14444442444444314444244443

4DVAR inversion

IOM representer-based inversion

Hessian Matrix

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

µ TºR GPG

Representer Matrix

( ') ( , ') '0

0

T

tt t t dt=òG H R

def:

Representer Matrix

( ') ( , ') '0

0

T

tt t t dt=òG H R

def:What is the physical meaning ofthe Representer Matrix?

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ

1

0

n

T T

-+ =C PG e dGPG

P β14444442444444314444244443

IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

µ TºR GPG

IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

µ TºR GPG

Representer Matrix

µ ( ') ( , ') ' ( ', ) ( ') '0 0

0 0

T TT T

t tt t t dt t t t dtº ò òP R HR H R

Representer Matrix

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ

1

0

n

T T

-+ =C PG e dGPG

P β14444442444444314444244443

TL-ROMS AD-ROMS

µR

IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

µ ( ') ( , ') ' ( ', ) ( ') '0 0

0 0

T TT T

t tt t t dt t t t dtº ò òP R HR H R

Representer Matrix

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ

1

0

n

T T

-+ =C PG e dGPG

P β14444442444444314444244443

Assume a special assimilation case:

( ) ( ) t t T= -

=

I

P

H

I

Observations = Full model state at time T

Diagonal Covariance with unit variance

µR

IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

µ ( ' ) ( , ') ' ( ', ) ( ' ) '0 0

0 0

T TT

t tt T t t dt t t t T dt º - -ò òI IRR RI

Representer Matrix

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ

1

0

n

T T

-+ =C PG e dGPG

P β14444442444444314444244443

Assume a special assimilation case:

Observations = Full model state at time T

Diagonal Covariance with unit variance

µR

( ) ( ) t t T= -

=

I

P

H

I

IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

Representer Matrix

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ

1

0

n

T T

-+ =C PG e dGPG

P β14444442444444314444244443

µR

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR

)( () T TT ssAssume you want to compute the model spatial covariance at time T

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR

)( () T TT ssAssume you want to compute the model spatial covariance at time T

(( , )( ) )0 0T T tt T=R sλ

STEP 1) AD-ROMS

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR

)( () T TT ssAssume you want to compute the model spatial covariance at time T

( , ) (( ) )0 0T T tt T=R sλ

STEP 1) AD-ROMS

( )

(( , ) () , ( ))0 0

0

T

t

Tt T T tT = sRs Rλ

144444424444443

STEP 2) run TL-ROMS forced with ( )0tλ

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR

)( () T TT ssAssume you want to compute the model spatial covariance at time T

( )

(( , ) () , ( ))0 0

0

T

t

Tt T T tT = sRs Rλ

144444424444443

STEP 2) run TL-ROMS forced with ( )0tλ

STEP 3) multiply by and take expected value

( , ) ( , )) ( ) ( )) (( 0 0T TTT Tt tT T T T=

I

s sR R ss1444442444443

( )T Ts

(( , )( ) )0 0T T tt T=R sλ

STEP 1) AD-ROMS

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR

)( () T TT ssAssume you want to compute the model spatial covariance at time T

( )

( ) ( , ) ( , ) ( )0 0

0

T

t

T t T T t T=s R R sλ

144444424444443

STEP 2) run TL-ROMS forced with ( )0tλ

STEP 3) multiply by and take expected value( )T Ts

( ) ( , ) ( )0 0Tt T t T=R sλ

STEP 1) AD-ROMS

µ( , ) ( ,) ( ))( 0 0T Tt T T tT T = ºR Rss R

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR ( )( ) T TT= ss

model to model covariance

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR ( )( ) T TT= ss

µ ( , ') ( '', )( ', '')0

TT

tt t t t tt t dº ò R RR ( ') ( '')Tt t= ss

model to model covariance

model to model covariance most general form

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR ( )( ) T TT= ss

model to model covariance

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR ( )( ) T TT= ss

model to model covariance

µ ( ') ( , ') ' ( ', ) ( ') '0 0

0 0

T TT T

t tt t t dt t t t dtº ò òI R HR H R

data to data covariance

ˆˆ T= dd

if we sample at observation locations through ( ') '0

( )T

tt dtò H

Representer Matrix

µ ( , ) ( , )0 0Tt T T tº R RR ( )( ) T TT= ss

model to model covariance

µ ( ') ( , ') ' ( ', ) ( ') '0 0

0 0

T TT T

t tt t t dt t t t dtº ò òI R HR H R

µ ( ') ( , ') ' ( ', ) ( ') '0 0

0 0

T TT T

t tt t t dt t t t dtº ò òP R HR H R

data to data covariance

ˆˆ T= dd

if we sample at observation locations through ( ') '0

( )T

tt dtò H

if we introduce a non-diagonal initial condition covariance

preconditioned data to data covariance

… back to the system to invert ….

( ) ˆ

ˆ

1 10

1 0T T - - -+ - =G G G CeP dC

H14444444244444443

( )( ) ˆ

ˆ0

1

n

T T

-+ =dGP CG eGP

P β14444442444444314444244443

4DVAR inversion

IOM representer-based inversion

Hessian Matrix

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

µ TºR GPG

Representer Matrix

( ') ( , ') '0

0

T

tt t t dt=òG H R

def:STRONG CONSTRAINT

4DVAR inversion

IOM representer-based inversion

Hessian Matrix

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

µ (( ') (', '') ' '''')0 0

TT T

t tt dt ttt t d

é ùº +ê úë ûò òR GCG C

Representer Matrix

ˆ

( ') ( '') ˆ' ''( ' (, '') ( ' ' '(, '' ))) '' ''0 0 0 0

1

T TT T T T

t t t t

n

t t t dt t tdt dt dt t tt

-é ù é ù+ =ê ú ê úë û ë ûò ò ò ò

P

G dCG GC C e

β14444444444444444444244444444444444444443 1444444444444444442444444444444444443

( ')( ) ( ( ˆ', ')') ( )

ˆ ( , ')0

1 1 1 0T TT

tt ttt t dt t

t t

- - -é ù+ - =ê úë ûò eC CG dG CG

H144444444444424444444444443 ( ) ( ') ( , ') '

T

tt t t t dt=òG H R

def:WEAK CONSTRAINT

IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

ˆ

ˆ( ') ( ', '') ( '') ' '' ( ', '') ( '') ) ' ''( '0 0 0 0

1

T T T T

T T

t t t t

n

t t t t dt dt t t t dt dtt

-é ù é ù+ =ê ú ê úë û ë ûò ò ò ò

P

G C G C C deG

β14444444444444444444244444444444444444443 1444444444444444442444444444444444443

WEAK CONSTRAINT

How to solve for corrections ? Method of solution in IROMS

( )te

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

ˆ

( ') ( ', '') ( '') ˆ' '( ', ' (' ')' '' ' ( '' ))0 00 0

1

TT T

t

T TT

t t t

n

dt dtt t t t dt dt tt t t

-é ù+ê ú é ù =êë úû ë ûò òò ò

P

G e dG C CG C

β144444444444444444442444444444444444444 144444444444444444244444444444444444343

WEAK CONSTRAINT

How to solve for corrections ? Method of solution in IROMS

( )te

IOM representer-based inversion

''( , '') ( ', '') ( '( ) ') ' '

0

T

T T

t

tn

tt t t t dt tt dt = òò C R He β

IOM representer-based inversion

Stabilized Representer Matrix

Representer Coefficients

ˆ

( ') ( '') ˆ' ''( ' (, '') ( ' ' '(, '' ))) '' ''0 0 0 0

1

T TT T T T

t t t t

n

t t t dt t tdt dt dt t tt

-é ù é ù+ =ê ú ê úë û ë ûò ò ò ò

P

G dCG GC C e

β14444444444444444444244444444444444444443 1444444444444444442444444444444444443

WEAK CONSTRAINT

How to solve for corrections ? Method of solution in IROMS

( )te

nβP̂ x ˆ = d

''( , '') ( ', '') ( '( ) ') ' '

0

T

T T

t

tn

tt t t t dt tt dt = òò C R He β

Method of solution in IROMS

''( , '') ( ', '') ( '( ) ') ' '

0

T

T T

t

tn

tt t t t dt tt dt = òò C R He β

STEP 1) Produce background state using nonlinear model starting from initial guess.

ˆ( ) [ , ( ), , ]0 0B t t t t=u Nu F

[ ]ˆ( ) ( , ) ( ', ) ( ) ( ') '0

00 0

t

F Bt

t t t t t N t dt= + +òu R u R u F

ˆ ˆ( ') ( ) '0

Tn

tt t dt= - òd d H u

ˆˆ n =dPβ

[ ]ˆ ˆ( ) ( , ) ( ( ')', ) ( ) ( ') ' ( ', ) '0 0

0 0

t tn

Bt t

t t t t t N t dt t dtt t= + + +ò òu R u R u F eR

STEP 2) Run REP-ROMS linearized around background state to generate first estimate of model trajectory

STEP 3) Compute model-data misfit

do 0n N= ®ˆ ( ) ( )0 0

Ft t=u u

STEP 4) Solve for Representer Coeficients

STEP 5) Compute corrections

STEP 6) Update model state using REP-ROMS

outer loop

Method of solution in IROMS

''( , '') ( ', '') ( '( ) ') ' '

0

T

T T

t

tn

tt t t t dt tt dt = òò C R He β

STEP 1) Produce background state using nonlinear model starting from initial guess.

ˆ( ) [ , ( ), , ]0 0B t t t t=u Nu F

[ ]ˆ( ) ( , ) ( ', ) ( ) ( ') '0

00 0

t

F Bt

t t t t t N t dt= + +òu R u R u F

ˆ ˆ( ') ( ) '0

Tn

tt t dt= - òd d H u

ˆˆ n =dPβ

[ ]ˆ ˆ( ) ( , ) ( ( ')', ) ( ) ( ') ' ( ', ) '0 0

0 0

t tn

Bt t

t t t t t N t dt t dtt t= + + +ò òu R u R u F eR

STEP 2) Run REP-ROMS linearized around background state to generate first estimate of model trajectory

STEP 3) Compute model-data misfit

do 0n N= ®ˆ ( ) ( )0 0

Ft t=u u

STEP 4) Solve for Representer Coeficients

STEP 5) Compute corrections

STEP 6) Update model state using REP-ROMS

outer loop

inner loop

µˆ

''

ˆ

( '')

( ')

( )

ˆ ˆ( ) ( ', ) ( ', '') ( , '') ( ) '' '0 0

Adjoint Solution

Convolution of Adjoint Solution

Ta

t T TT T

t t t

t

t

t

t t t t t t t t dt dt dt= ò ò ò

f

P H R C R H

λ

τ

ψ ψ) ) )

144444444444244444444444314444444444444444442444444444444444444434

ˆ

( ')

( )

ˆ0

ngent Linear model forced with

Sampling of Tangent Linear solution

T

t

t

t

dtò

f

τ

1444444444444444444444444424444444444444444444444444434144444444444444444444444444444424444444444444444444444444444 3

+Cεψ

444444

How to evaluate the action of the stabilized Representer Matrix µP

Baroclinic Jet Example -

… end

µˆ

''

ˆ

( '')

( ')

( )

ˆ ˆ( ) ( ', ) ( ', '') ( , '') ( ) '' '0 0

Adjoint Solution

Convolution of Adjoint Solution

Ta

t T TT T

t t t

t

t

t

t t t t t t t t dt dt dt= ò ò ò

f

P H R C R H

λ

τ

ψ ψ) ) )

144444444444244444444444314444444444444444442444444444444444444434

ˆ

( ')

( )

ˆ0

ngent Linear model forced with

Sampling of Tangent Linear solution

T

t

t

t

dtò

f

τ

1444444444444444444444444424444444444444444444444444434144444444444444444444444444444424444444444444444444444444444 3

+Cεψ

444444

µˆ

ˆ

( ')

( ) ( ')

ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) ( ', ) ( ', '') ( '') '' '0 0 0

Convolution of Adjoint Solution

Tangent Linear model forced with

Sa

T t T

t t t

t

t

t

t t t t t t dt dt dt=ò ò òf

f

P H R C

τ

ψ λ144444444424444444443

14444444444444444442444444444444444444434

ˆ( ) mpling of Tangent Linear solution t

+Cε

τ

ψ

14444444444444444444444442444444444444444444444444434

µˆ

ˆ

ˆ

( ) ( ')

( )

ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) ( ', ) ( ') '0 0

Tangent Linear model forced with

Sampling of Tangent Linear solution

T t

t t

t

t

t

t t t t dt dt= +ò òf

P H R f Cε

τ

τ

ψ ψ1444444442444444443

144444444444444444444244444444444444444444434

µ

ˆ( )

ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) ( )0

Sampling of Tangent Linear solution

T

t

t

t t dt= +òP H Cε

τ

ψ τ ψ144444424444443

top related