the international light-cone workshop july 7, 2005 cairns, australia

Post on 06-Jan-2016

38 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Hadron Spectroscopy at BABAR BY Usha Mallik (University of Iowa) Representing The BaBar Collaboration. The International Light-Cone Workshop July 7, 2005 Cairns, Australia. Topics:. Hadron Spectroscopy: D s (cs) States : Inclusive and Exclusive studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

1

Hadron Spectroscopy at BABARBY

Usha Mallik (University of Iowa)

Representing

The BaBar Collaboration

The International Light-Cone WorkshopJuly 7, 2005

Cairns, Australia

2

Topics:

Hadron Spectroscopy:– Ds (cs) States : Inclusive and Exclusive studies

– Double Charmonium Production; the X and the Y

– Pentaquarks– Charmed Baryon studies

Summary What can we learn from each other ?

3Plan to Double Dataset by Next Summer

The BABAR Detector at PEP-II and the Dataset

BBSee )4(

Ecm = 10.58 GeV

And Much More

4

DSJ (cs) Spectroscopy

New States DSJ(2317)+ and DSJ(2460)+ – First Observed Inclusively in e+e- Collisions

Previously Established States with Likely JPC

DS (2112)+ 1-(+) S-Wave (c and s spins aligned)

Ds also DS 0

DS(2536)+ 1+(+) P-Wave (needs

confirmation)D*(2010)+K0

D*(2007)0K+

DS(2573)+ 2+(+) D-Wave (consistent

with)D0K+

Ground State DS(1969)+: JP=0-, c and s spins opposite, in S-

wave

5

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

0)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

* 0) 0.21 (90% CL)

Belle 87 fb-1

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

0)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

0) 0.11 (95% CL)

BaBar 125 fb-1

Discovery

Ds* Ds

Discovery of DsJ Statese+e- cc DsJ + X

DsJ(2317)+ Ds+0 DsJ(2460)+ Ds

*+0

M(2460) – M(2112)

BABAR, BELLE, CLEO mutually confirm, also CDF (2317)

Caution: These Decays cross-feed

6

• Decays violate isospin: mixing

• Look for radiative and dipion transitions

• If is , expect is forbidden

is forbidden

• If is , expect is allowed

is allowed

0 0

DsJ*(2317)

DsJ*(2317) Ds

0

DsJ*(2317) Ds

DsJ (2460) Ds

DsJ* (2460)

DsJ (2460) Ds

1

...3,2,1,0)2317( 0* PssJ JDD

1 )2460( 0* PssJ JwaveSDD

2,1,0PJwaveP(also D-Wave)

(for a conventional meson)

7

DsJ(2460): 0± excluded

Search for DsJ→Ds

DsJ (2460)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds 0)

0.3750.0540.057

B(DsJ (2317) Ds)

B(DsJ (2317) Ds 0)

0.17 (95% CL)

BaBar 125 fb-1

Excludes 0± if present

DsJ(2317): compatiblewith 0+

BABAR: PRD 69 (2004) 031101 (R) ; BELLE : PRL 92 (2004) 012002

BABAR

B(DsJ (2460) Ds)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds* 0)

0.550.130.08

B(DsJ (2317) Ds)

B(DsJ (2317) Ds 0)

0.05 (90% CL)

Belle 87 fb-1

)2317( No sJD

8

DsJ(2460) → Ds0Kinematics

DsJ* (2317)reflection

Ds*

reflection

DsJ (2460)

high Ds* sideband

low Ds* sideband

DsJ(2460)

hep-ex/0408067

BABAR

9

BELLE: PRL 91 (2003)262002

10

Exclusive Production of D*SJ in B ->DSJ

(*)+ D(*)

Kinematic Constraints Help, Even though Lower Stats

Reduces Backgrounds

Measure Ratios of Branching Fractions

Measure Br

Well-defined Initial State

Test DSJ(*) Spin Assignments

Reconstruct one B: other is a B for Study

11

B DsJ (*)+ D(*)

2*4/ BES psm

BABAR: PRL 93 (2004) 181801Data sample: 122 million B pairs

DDsJsJ**(2317)(2317)++

DDss00

DDsJsJ(2460(2460))++

DDss**00

DDsJsJ(2460(2460))++

DDss

mmESES mm((DDsJsJ)

Full reconstruction of the exclusive decay

Sum over charged and neutral B’s 112 ± 14 events

139 ± 17events

020.0045.0274.0

))2460(.(.

))2460(.(.0*

sDDFB

DDFB

sJ

ssJ

We measure:

2/* sEE B

mmESES mm((DDsJsJ)BABAR

12

B DsJ (*)+D* Results

B.F. (10-3) DsJ*(2317)+ Ds0 DsJ(2460)+ Ds*0 DsJ(2460)+ Ds

B0 1.5 ± 0.4 ± 0.2(+0.5-0.3) 5.5 ± 1.2 ± 1.0(+1.9-1.2) 2.3 ± 0.3 ± 0.3(+0.8-0.5)

B+ 0.9 ± 0.6 ± 0.2(+0.3-0.2) 7.6 ± 1.7 ± 1.8(+2.6-1.6) 1.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.3(+0.5-0.3)

B.F. Productsfor BDsJ

(*)+D*

m(Ds+0) m(Ds

*+0) m(Ds)B0 B0 B0

B+B+ B+

DsJ(2317)DsJ(2460) DsJ(2460)

BABAR

BELLE: PRL 91 (2003) 262002 Data sample: ~124 million B pairs

in agreement with Belle results

13

B DsJ (*)+D Results

B.F. (10-3) DsJ*(2317)+ Ds0 DsJ(2460)+ Ds*0 DsJ(2460)+ Ds

B0 1.8 ± 0.4 ± 0.3(+0.6-0.4) 2.8 ± 0.8 ± 0.5(+1.0-0.6)

0.8 ± 0.2 ± 0.1(+0.3-0.2)

B+ 1.0 ± 0.3 ± 0.1(+0.4-0.2) 2.7 ± 0.7 ± 0.5(+0.9-0.6)

0.6 ± 0.2 ± 0.1(+0.2-0.1)

B.F. Productsfor BDsJ

(*)+D

in agreement with Belle results

m(Ds+0) m(Ds

*+0) m(Ds)

B0 B0 B0

B+ B+ B+

DsJ(2460) DsJ(2460)DsJ(2317)

BABAR

14

• Two body decay BDDSJ forces DSJ to populate helicity zero only

• Analyze angular distribution (cos h) of daughter of DSJ

• BELLE Finds from Angular Distribution – DSJ(2317)* J = 0 (Preliminary)

hB DsJ

D

0

Ds(*)

Spin Analysis of B DDSJ*

15

BDsJ(2460)+D

DsJ+

(2460)

Ds

h

J=1 (2=4.0/4) preferred to J=2 (2=36.4/4)

Data points from m(Ds fits corrected for detector acceptance and efficiency

J=2J=1

confirms Belle measurement

BABAR

16

e.g. Godfrey-Isgur model

S-wave P-wave

Ds+

Ds*+

Ds1(2536)+

DsJ (2573)+

Ds0(2317)

Ds1(2460)

DsJ*(2317)+, DsJ (2460)+

– Observed by BaBar, Belle and CLEO – Unexpectedly below threshold for DK and D*K, respectively – Consistent with P-wave cs states but other interpretations not ruled out– If cs, observed decays

• DsJ*(2317)+ Ds

+

• DsJ (2460)+ Ds*+

are isospin violating narrow

– DsJ (2460)+ Ds+

also observed (and used to

determine J)

Taking Stock of cs States

Several other explanations exist e.g. Molecules or Hybrids

17

New Charmonium-like States

X(3872) J/π+π-

Average Mass 3871.9 ± 0.5 MeV

Narrow < 2.3 MeV @ 90% CL

(D0D*0 threshold at 3871.3 ± 1.0)

CDFPRL 93 072201 (2004)

BELLE PRL 92 262001 (2003)

BABARhep-ex/0406022

D0PRL 93 162002 (2004)

18

B+ X(3872)0K+ Reconstruction

Recent Update:

BELLE (256 fb -1) hep-ex/0505038, BABAR hep-ex in preparation

Background from B decays to same final state J/K

19

About X(3872)

• Search for a Charged Partner

From 212 fb -1 Data BABAR Observed No Signal for X-

Phys. Rev. D71 : 031501, 2005

B(B0 X-K+, X- J/ π-π0) < 5.4 X 10 -6 @ 90% CLB(B- X-KS, X- J/ π-π0) < 11 X 10 -6 @ 90% CL

• Charmonium State : no isospin partner expected (data)

• Molecule State (?) : highly suppressed B0 X(3872) predicted

• Diquark-antidiquark State : different masses of X(3872)

in B0 and B+ decays predicted, |M| > 5 MeV

E. Braten, M. Kusunoki hep-ph/0412268

L. Maiani, F. Piccini, A.D. Polosa, V. Riquer PRD 71(2005) 014028

20

B0 X(3872)0KS Reconstruction

Background

21

Other searches for X(3872)

Search for X(3872) in events with initial state radiation (if JPC = 1-- )

Search for X(3872) in B X(3872)K in the spectrum recoiling against K from the B decays (with the other B fully reconstructed):

B(X(3872) in B X(3872)K, X(3872) J/) < 3.2 X 10 -4 at 90% CL and so, BF(X(3872) J/+-) 4.3 %

mes of all the exclusively reconstructed B

mES : B mass using beam energy

Use BABAR-BELLE average BF(B+ X(3872)K+, X(3872)J/) = (13.2 2.2) x 10 -

6

PRD 71 (2005) 052001

BABAR

22

BELLE: 256 fb -14.0

C= +1 favored

hep-ex/0505037

X(3872) : +- Invariant Mass Distribution

BELLE: hep-ex/0505038BABAR: hep-ex in prep.

Di-pion mass consistent with 0+- , again C =+1 ; S-wave J/ favored: J++ favored over J-+

Isospin violating: predicted

D0D*0 molecule, Swanson PLB 588 (2004) 189, Törnqvist PLB 590 (2004) 209

Also X(3872) π+π-π0J/

23

X(3872): BELLE Finds Data Disfavors 0++ and 2++, Leaving 1++

cc ? 1++ is c1’

X(3872) is too light

M[Ge

DDThreshold

3872

24

}C=+1 }C=-1

c , c , c(2S)J/, (2S)

G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten & J. Lee

PRD67, 054023 (2003)

Study double charmonium in e+e- annihilation

Double Charmonium Production

Theorists predict the cross sections of the two processes to be comparable

25

Reconstruct J/ or (2S) and Look at Recoil MassBABAR: 124 fb -1, hep-ex/0506062

c

c(2S)

c0

BELLE: PRD 70 (2004) 071102

BABAR

26

Double Charmonium Production from BELLE

From BELLE

Evidence of X(3940): 4.5

m = 3940 ± 12 MeV, < 96 MeV at 90% CL

27

8 : 253 fb -1 with 59 ±11 Events

A Near-threshold J/ Mass Enhancement in B KJ/ at 3940 MeV/c2

BELLE: Phys. Rev. Lett. 94: 182002, 2005

Dominantly cc

BELLE

Is it the same as X(3940) ?

28

A Broad Structure in J/π+π- Mass near 4.26 GeVe+e- ISRJ/+- in Initial State Radiation

BABAR: 211 fb-1 (preliminary)

(2S)125±23 excess events

Recoil Mass Consistent with zero

hep-ex/0506081, submitted to PRL

29

•In addition to (2S) a Broad Structure is Observed in ISR Events

•JPC = 1-- ; Can be Characterized by a single Resonance at 4.26 GeV and Width ~ 0.09 GeV

•Too low Statistics to Discern if Multiple States together - (e.g. S and D waves can mix)

+ - mass distribution from Y(4260)

Y(4260) J/ S-wave phase space

Why no rise in R ?

4.26

D*D* threshold

3.77

BES, PRL 88 (2003), 101802

BABAR

30

Pentaquark searchesPentaquark discovery in 2003, ( confirmed by 13 experiments)

(statistical significance of individual experiments is not high ~5-6 )Also many negative searches reported, especially a recent high statistics study by CLAS

Claims of exotic narrow baryons

LEPS, CLAS, …:

M=(1542±5)MeV/c2

<21MeV/c2

NA49:

M=(1862±2)MeV/c2

<18MeV/c2

H1:

M=(3099±6)MeV/c2

<28MeV/c2

S

I3

5(1540)+ [uudds]

5(1860)[ddssu]

5c(3100)[uuddc]

The anti-decuplet for Pentaquarks

31

Inclusive and Exclusive Searches at BABAR

5+, 5

--, 50, 5c

0

32

accepted by PRL

e+e- annihilation (~123 fb -1)hep-ex/0502004

33

accepted by PRL

34

Upper Limit

35

No Signal Observed by CLAS in this Mode with ~40 times Statistics , now repeating other modes

BABAR studies electro- and hadro-production in interactions with the

material of the inner detector ; Observes no signal

•So far, evidence of 5 claimed in— real/virtual photoproduction— hadroproduction

• photoproduction

36Detector Tomography with pKS0 vertices

230 fb -1BABAR

e- e+

37

pKs mass distribution

Mass resolution ~2 MeV

Clear Ks from Decays Selected

Protons Selected from Particle ID

BABAR

38

Associate p Ks Vertex with ± and K±

BABAR

(1115)

39No Pentaquark Observed by BABARBABAR

40

Charmed Baryon Studies

Precision Mass Measurement of C+ (cud)

Production Process and Ratio of Branching Fractions of C0 (csd)

cc or B C0 + X

Production Process and Ratio of Branching Fractions of C0 (css)

cc or B C0 + X C

0 - +

- + - +

-K- + +

41

Mass Measurement of C

+

Using Low-Q-value Decay Modes of C+ KSK+ and C

+ 0KSK+

m(C+ KsK+ ) = 2286.501 ± 0.042 (stat.) ± 0.144 (sys.) MeV/c2

m(C+ 0KsK+ ) = 2286.303 ± 0.181 (stat.) ± 0.126 (sys.) MeV/c2

BABAR Result : m(C+ ) = 2286.46 ± 0.14 MeV/c2

PDG Value 2284.9 ± 0.6 MeV/c2

Cross-checks:

m(C+ pK+ ) = 2286.39 ± 0.12 (stat.) ± 0.45 (sys.) MeV/c2

m(C+ pKs) = 2286.36 ± 0.03 (stat.) ± 0.43 (sys.) MeV/c2

m() = 1115.68 ± 0.01 (stat.) ± 0.04 (sys.) MeV/c2 PDG Value = 1115.683 ± 0.006 MeV/c2 m(KS) = 497.56 ± 0.04 (stat.) ± 0.26 (sys.) MeV/c2 PDG Value = 497.648 ± 0.022 MeV/c2

BABAR

hep-ex/0507009, submitted to PRD

42

116 fb -1

c0-π+

c0-K+

B(c0-K+)

B(c0-π+)

= 0.294 ± 0.018 ± 0.016

Goals: Measure Ratio of Decay BFs

: Study Production MechanismBABAR

hep-ex/0504014, submitted to PRL

43

Study c0 Momentum (p*) in e+e- rest frame

c0 from B Decays

c0 peak from B’s absent in off-peak

B (B c0X) •B (c

0 -+) = 2.11 ± 0.19(stat.) ± 0.25(syst.) X 10 -

4

c0-π+

(e+e- C0X) •B (c

0 -+) = 388 ± 39(stat.) ± 41(syst.) fb

Results:

Efficiency Corrected

BABAR

116 fb -1

hep-ex/0504014, submitted to PRL

44

Inclusive c0 Studies

Branching Fractions and Production Mechanism from p* Spectrum

Decay Modes of C0 Studied -+, -+- +, and -K- + +

C0-+

P* > 2.8 GeV/c

225 fb -1

Results:

BABAR

SLAC-PUB-11323, hep-ex/0507011

45

The p* Spectrum from -π+ Mode

Off-peak onlyOn & Off-peak

Not Corrected for Efficiency

B C0 Production (First Observation)

Analysis in Progress

BABAR

SLAC-PUB-11323 hep-ex/0507011

46

Summary & Conclusion

Unfolding cs spectroscopy

New States X(3872), Y(3940)… and Y(4260)?

Copious Double Charmonium Production

Pentaquark Fading ?

Exciting Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy

What can we Provide ?

47

48

49

50

51

Kaon momentum spectrum

52

Kinematics

DsJ* (2317)

Ds*

reflection

DsJ* (2317)

DsJ (2460) Ds*(Ds

) 0

DsJ* (2317)

reflection

• Mutual cross feed

•widths are consistentwith zero

• No evidence for

DsJ* (2317) DsJ (2460)

DsJ* (2317)

DsJ* (2317) and DsJ (2460)

DsJ (2460) Ds

0

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

0)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

* 0) 0.21 (90% CL)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

0)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds

0) 0.11 (95% CL)

Belle 87 fb-1

BaBar 125 fb-1

53

DsJ(2460): 0± excluded

Search for DsJ→Ds

DsJ (2460)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds 0)

0.3750.0540.057

B(DsJ (2317) Ds)

B(DsJ (2317) Ds 0)

0.17 (95% CL)

BaBar 125 fb-1

B(DsJ (2460) Ds)

B(DsJ (2460) Ds* 0)

0.550.130.08

B(DsJ (2317) Ds)

B(DsJ (2317) Ds 0)

0.05 (90% CL)

Belle 87 fb-1

Excludes 0± if present

DsJ(2317): compatiblewith 0+

BABAR: PRD 69 (2004) 031101 (R) ; BELLE : PRL 92 (2004) 012002

BABAR

54

55

56

57

58

Search in Inclusive B XK Reconstruction

59

Branching fractions from b xk study

60

61

Ds+Results

• D* and selection analogous to inclusive analysis• Ds

+(K+K)fully reconstructed• measure branching fraction product:

Signal 212 ±19

2*4/ BES psm Dividing by our measurement of

B(B0 Ds*+D*-), we obtain

B(Ds++) = (3.6 ± 0.9)% (CLEO)

to be compared with

Readjustment of many results needed!Not used yet for other results in this talk

B (B0 Ds*+ D*) x B (Ds

++) = (8.71 0.78(stat)) x10-4

B(Ds++) = (4.71 ± 0.47(stat) ±0.35(syst))%

62

Electroproduction in e-Be

BABAR

top related