the good and the bad - bicyclists' experiences in copenhagen

Post on 24-Jun-2015

87 Views

Category:

Presentations & Public Speaking

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at the 2012 Cycling and Society Symposion, London

TRANSCRIPT

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

The Good and the Bad – Bicyclists’ Experiences In Copenhagen

1)

1)

2)

1) Forest & Landscape, University of Copenhagen2) Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark

Bernhard Snizek

Thomas Sick Nielsen

Hans Skov-Petersen

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

IntroductionGoalMethodologyResults

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

INTRODUCTION > Mapping of experiences

(Nold 2006)

Emotion map

(Leahu & Schwenk, 2008)

Arousal Map

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Cyclists’ Experiences

spatially explicit cycling experiences are rarely studied:

land use traffic intensity pollution, noise pedestrians infrastructure

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Goal

Are the characteristics of elements and locations of the city correlated to the likelihood of having a positive or negative cycling experience.

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Methodology

data collectiondata processingframework for relating cyclists’ experiences to urban phenomena

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Data collectiononline, map-based questionnaire

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Data Processing

Removal of erroneously drawn routes

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Data Processing

Map matching

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Data Processing

Dots projected onto their respective routes

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Data Processing

- dots > 100m away from routes omitted- 554 positive and 336 negative experiences

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Data Processing86,332 non experience points laid out on routes; distance 50m

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Data Processing

- GIS layers selected or created

- GIS layers’ data added to points

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

FrameworkCycling facilities and level of service for cyclists

- Roads with cycle facilities

no cycling facilities cycle path (curb) cycle lane (markings) off road path (cyclists) off road path (mixed)

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Framework

Cycling facilities and level of service for cyclists

- Distance to nearest cycle rack

- Number of bike racks within 100m

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Framework

Street types

Primary roads

Secondary roads

Residential streets - detached or semi-detached housing

Residential streets with multi-storey housing

Cycle paths exclusively for bikes

Mixed paths for cyclists and pedestrians

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Framework

distance to closest bus stopdistance to nearest intersectiondistance to the nearest traffic lights

Road environments

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

FrameworkUrban density & centrality

Distance to town hall

Number of companies within 100m

Number of retail units within 100m

Distance to closest water or green areaPercentage of green of route segments

Green

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

FrameworkRoute related measures

Deviations from the direct line (origin-destination)

The angle between the current segment and the line from the experience point towards town hall.

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Geographic distribution of the dots

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Model

Multinomial regression

Probability of a positive experience vs. no experience

Probability of a negative experience vs. no experience

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Results

increase the probability for a positive experience

reduce the probability for a positive experience

increase the probability for a negative experience

reduce the probability for a negative experience

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Results

increase the probability of a positive experience

availability of cycling facilities (CPH style)

greater distance to bus stops

high percentage of greenshort distance to water bodiesshort distance to town hall

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Results

reduce the probability of a positive experience

primary roads

secondary roads

greater distance to direct line

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Results

increase the probability of a negative experience

closeness to intersectionscompanies within 100m

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Results

reduce the probability of a negative experience

greenness of cycling environment

residential streetprimary road

availability of on-route cycling facilities

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Perspectives

develop a cycle environment surface

mapping of hotspotsvisualisation could aid planning processes

Cycling and Society Symposium 2012

Thank you

top related