tel. flapril 30, 2010 bnp-2010-108 page 3, april 30, 2010 bnp-2010- 108 page 3 cc: mr. samuel j....

Post on 07-Oct-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

R. R. Sgarro PPL Bell Bend, LLC % *,#Manager, Nuclear RegulatOry Affairs 38. Bomboy Lane, Suite 2 .

Berwick, PA 18603Tel. 570.802,8102 FAX 570.802.8119 fl" -

rrsgarro@pp!web.com W, .•.

April 30, 2010

ATTN: Document Control DeskU..S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

BELL BEND NUCLEAR POWER PLANTRESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTALRAI'S: SCHEDULE UPDATEBNP-2010-108 Docket No. 52-039

Reference: Letter from S. Imboden (U.S. NRC) to R.R. Sgarro (PPL), "Requests forAdditional Information Related to the Environmental Review for the CombinedLicense Application for Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant," dated July 10, 2009.

The purpose of this letter is to update the NRC staff on the schedule for responding to theremaining environmental requests for additional information (RAI's) that were issued in thereferenced correspondence to PPL Bell Bend, LLC (PPL). These RAI's address environmentalissues as discussed in Part 3 of the Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant Combined LicenseApplication.

The enclosure provides the current ER RAI response status and the planned submittal dates forthe remaining responses.

As the staff is aware, PPL is currently inthe process of developing COLA changes to reflect thedecision to move the plant footprint within the existing project boundary ini order to avoidimpacts to wetlands. The following RAI's are affected by the footprint change, and the reviseddates reflect Current plans for updating the associated sections of the BBNPP COLA:MET 2.7-1, AE 4.3-2, STO 2.1-1, H 4.2-1, LU 3..7-1, LU 4.1-1, LU 5.1-1, LU 5.1-2, TE 2.4-6,TE 2.4-7, TE 2.4-8, TE 4.3-1, TE 4.3-2, TE 4.3-4, TE 4.3-7, TE 4.3-8, TE 4.3-10, USACE-la,USACE-!b, USACE-2a, USACE-2e, and USACE-2f.

In addition, for RAI STO 2.1-1, the staff previously requested that PPL submit TIFF files forseven figures, both in color and in black and white. Two of those Figures, 2.2-1 and 2.4-7, bothcontained in August 10, 2009, RAI responses, are affected by the aforementioned plant footprintchange, and the revised date in the enclosure reflects our current plans'for updating theassociated sections of the BBNPP COLA, as noted above.

The other five figures (Figures 1 through 3, which were included in response to RAI GEO 2.6-1on September 11, 2009, and Figures 2.3-21 and 2.3-22 from the BBNPP COLA ER) are notavailable in the requested formats as these figures were extracted from documents for whichPPL does not have native files.

7Wlr7c7"ICZ)

April 30, 2010 BNP-2010-108 Page 2

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 570-802-8102.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on April 30, 2010

Respectfully,

Rocco R. Sgarro,

RRS/dw

Enclosure: Response Status for Environmental Requests for Additional Information, BellBend Nuclear Power Plant, Luzerne County Pennsylvania

April 30, 2010 BNP-2010-108 Page 3,April 30, 2010 BNP-2010- 108 Page 3

cc: Mr. Samuel J. CollinsRegional AdministratorU.S, Nuclear Regulatory CommissionRegion I475 Allendale RoadKing of Prussia, PA 19406-1415

Mr. Michael CanovaProject ManagerU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission11555 Rockville PikeRockville, MD 20852

Ms. Stacey ImbodenProject ManagerU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission11555 Rockville PikeRockville, MD 20852

Enrnclsure 1 BNP-2010-108 Panel1...... . .. 1. ..... . . . . 1 0 8. .. . 1--

Enclosure

Response Status for Environmental Requests for Additional InformationBell Bend Nuclear Power PlantLuzerne County Pennsylvania

Enclosure 1 BNP-2010-108 Paae 2

NRC Response Status forEnvironmental Requests f-or Additional Information (RAls)

RAI Review Plan Section Planned Submittal Schedule.77ESRP 71 1,,"0 d Sijb'iijtt -August _10J 2009F. _J,

ACC2,7,1I,.J.:2 ESRP 7.1 m,~ACQ 7 2ý-1ýT ESRP 7.2 S~br~ittedAbgt~10, 2009

>,ACQr7,22-3 , ESRI? 7.2 ýSubhited.AugU~t 1.ý0;20091-C 4 ESIRPý 7:2 - -SriiftedAbgU't 1~,20 7

AC7.ý5 (evse k*0ESRI.712. ,itdCt~OrV2ACCT772615 3,bESfM id7 2 0 lpjýt 20,,0Q9j

A~C~7'3 - - - ESRP, 7 3 '2009AC-3LLN/A .'~m1"Z01

'AQQ3- 1 NVA -itd 10

MET 2.7-1 ESRP 2.7 July 23, 2010'MET 2-27j,02' ; 7 ESRPIT 2 ISub' iited N6,Vhb&30'2o0.r I MET'-2.aU.3 > __7ESRP'2'.7' -dSpei6, i,'QQ

MET- 2 7_4T TI TK> ESitfPi247c.. i~MET 5.31-4 i, "ESRI?'27, ESRP'53'ý3ý.,ttý "ýfmteýW-fb' 30 6200-"

~MET 5.8,=2 ýESR 2~7, jESjR_5 -3.5.1 %ibftiittO stA hoT ŽMET 5,a.34 1 EP53-~A -f 7unitbedS~~ie , 0 T

-~ MET:564-1 - SP2,,Si4MET 64-2 XIJESRPL6' _S Sb--iitd Septbuerib7 ~O9:

MET 5.'3k51 -4 TfESRP t9ý_3ý,_ 54*ftd Auus 3Th 200.9~A9~3~Y . 'ESRlR' 3 ý Subnit6L0tbr6be696

_L-T'9 3-$ 7 IESrWIM9'3 Li'SubrtteS-No~erb6ý Yi1Ž0)

* . 717AL'Ta3l,4 11 ESRP.,9i'3, 7A ~ L~T'9 .3, LI . '. ESRP&9.ý'3. .. ý 46hl~ tm~ 5'40

AEJ2 $ubns2~3f iitftd_,0cob(60,92!009,AE 2~~3-2 ]~ESRP 2.3j1 1 _bmt~ACiti,~09'7

AE2 Z%3 - '_'ESI3I 2. 2;A ubmittejd..Aubute6,c5;, 20.09'

-- .AE -12'v4!3 '1 ESRPý24.AE~2:4,4 !ESRP,24 2ýh Au ,

- ~ ESF-2:4.2K,A 4- ~ESRP,34 nitdb~ 9

'AE343 MA IESRP..1734.2,; 17 W'bri~~dA si02~'~2AE"AZ47 7 7. ESRP 3.42 'S~bi nitt d ucgi~ 0 "t '1a

:AE 34'3-2 ER 2Nvmer1,0- AE :4-,3, - IIESRPAI3Y42 _71S'if~~~~6 dAg

I~~~Eubm4t :,' - Lis~ 2 _ SueIvjbi0,'20q109j~AE1 51 - .ESR1P 5 3L~2- 7~~ ist 120 i009.

LI,-93- b- d tSI5,920- IA933- ESRP.9 32 U~it ~US Z M

AE 9*3.74 9 ESRP 4.3.2 Novebe 30, 2010',;etCL25~ AE 4;%$,7~%ERI T!. -Wi 'd -_ti1 ~ fdUF10,- 2009

Enc Iosure 1 BNP-2010-108 Pane 3Enclosu.re 1 BNP2010-108. Pae 3

NRC Response Status for Environmental RAIs (continued)RAI Review Plan Section Planned Submittal Schedule

--- 2~'2 --- F-7P -6. Admt 102QO9E I.'S.13 . Subl iittedA uýIsf-1.• 200971ý,CR'72 5- - -S R. E P-7½~3 -E$ '5V3 A,

... ...... .................. Al IP- ai 7itte.d ,A u gust, 1•,20 9,2'005 ,7_EsRP, Z"E Z ... roiiESP2.5.2, ESRP 2.5u.3 ,

.R,2, 5-2- ' E......... . 1SR " I

STO 2.1-1 ESRP 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 4.3 November 1, 2010 9T

......... -ESRP,2..34 W ., m en-1-- C I ES P -714,',1G . "-••-SR 34t 5 Rm'N"' . be .,,2009,

Eo2 ESR 3.6; - -N. " 19u,2009',

H 4.2-1 ESRP 4.2.1 January 13, 20110,,r";,'_ '; .- .. .•• ;2•1 '•-_ .. . . .-:--[ .ESRP 5 ;2..2" --. .. Su itd,..S~ptmI eT25, ,2010,9.2.,.. . .' ..--- .. . .".H.- 'ESRP.15';3 2.J1 I Siritte•lNieb6 -aO;2•0o1i

LU C3;1. 71 2ESRP 6 Dc-- 2009

LUH~9 4.1,1 1 - ESRP 4.e

-'S 632 -_7 II~bi ESPr1i25,2009-I ', -- 8 P2 , , ' 11, 2 0.

L4.1ESRP 4.1 qe17,20109'

LU 5.1-1 ESRP 4.1 December 3, 2010 9- 'LU 5.-2 ESRP 4.1 December 3, 2010V,

NR~~~~~05~~~~~5-fQ -0 d7 S..IIA ~ Sibiitei~~'1 Q 9

,_. , ...... ,.- . ... ... .. , .....- d'. .E C ~E SR P, 4.02 -2009itte ut 5¢2

7Tre p 52j ,t.i, E7. E.P15 7.7d 2Sbitýdb1~0'097

.'-SE25i,1 - . .. ESR, 25 i- _ S -ifei'd -- btl .

.:z_... __SE 2.'5,13.. . : :• ESI3P 2 ,5•:4 2 " ,Sdb~ i~ttea O s~ld •.1',2•09,(

... SE2-5. . . .. "-ESRP 2 _2-W S1, &m iftt de n ro'24.72' y ' SE: -ESRP25 : b•, . . i....... t1- . 004 -

!H25' .-. ER~~ " ,1~if~ A ~ '520109,:SE 2 57ý ESRP2 521 Decmbe .3 00SE 2.5-8 ESRP 2. 52eibo 3i210LSE5.1'- -1- ESRP 4~.1 Deene ,21,4SE 15.10-2 ESRP 4.1.4 Deeb 3 0 "SE"27i5-t 1 !'.'7ESR P 25;4A S~jbmitted Aug'ust1IcY2009-fSEH 2.5-12' ES 4J25 4 S-UUbifttd'OdubeF19 2~ESEH 4'.541 -- 2' ER254ubm tdSetiber h2'9SE 4'I1ESRýP, 4.415'u ~ ld709SEAH'54-1 :1ESRP 4ý .i ý-ý2,-6~t~ S1t~i&111

- 'SE:2!.~45;'3L- r--6 3-- 20NP4~V 1'-

Enclosure 1 BNP-2010-108 Paae 4

NRC ResponseRAI

s for Environmental RAIs (continued)leview Plan Section Planned Submittal Schw

I r. Z.1A+0

TE 2;4-7TE 2.4-8TE 4.3-1TE 4.3-2

4.'4. I fuyluUL ID,2.4.1 August 16,2.4.1 August 16,4.3.1 NoVember 14.3.1 November 1

112

r - ---- ]

Enclosure 1 BNP-2010-108 Paae 5

USACE Response Status for Environmental RAIsRAI Planned Submittal Schedule

USACE-la August 6, 2010USACE-ib August 6, 2010','USACE;2 September 3, 2010'

USACE-2a August 6, 2010','

UozSKE:-2 -Submiftted N,6vemei6307T,•09T ,i• j7-. 7.USA ',6,r ., ~209,USACE-2e August 6, 2010',.USACE-2f August 6, 2010',2

tSAC E 72" _ _dif~~USACE-2h September 30, 2011'USACE-3 September' 3, 20101

The responses to these RAts were requested tO be provided Within 30 calendar days. Based on vendor review and input,the time required to complete the necessary work Will exceed this timeffame and PPL requests additional time; asIndicated above. ... . ....2The planned submittal date for this RAI response has been revised since submittal of BNP-2010-056 on February 26,2010.

top related