taking politics out of redistricting
Post on 09-May-2015
695 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Taking the Politics out ofTaking the Politics out ofRedistrictingRedistricting
Peter Cannon, SecretaryPeter Cannon, SecretaryWisconsin Democracy CampaignWisconsin Democracy Campaign
Presented to theWisconsin Land Information AssociationOctober 21, 2010
2
Should we Take the PoliticsShould we Take the PoliticsOut of Redistricting?Out of Redistricting?
We know who is responsible andWe know who is responsible andthey are answerable to the votersthey are answerable to the voters
Every reform proposalEvery reform proposal –– to someto someextentextent –– makes the process lessmakes the process lessdemocraticdemocratic
3
Should we Take the PoliticsShould we Take the PoliticsOut of Redistricting?Out of Redistricting?
Most states have chosen to haveMost states have chosen to havelegislators do itlegislators do it
Reform proposals wonReform proposals won’’t work anyt work anybetterbetter
Legislators know the districtsLegislators know the districts
Continued
4
WhatWhat’’s the Problem?s the Problem?
If there is stalemateIf there is stalemate –– splitsplitcontrol between parties,control between parties,legislators draw maps thatlegislators draw maps thatfavor incumbentsfavor incumbents
If one party controls theIf one party controls theprocess, politicalprocess, politicalgerrymanderinggerrymandering
5
WhatWhat’’s the Problem?s the Problem?
Electoral CompetitivenessElectoral Competitiveness– Since 2000, only three U.S. House
races have been competitive(margin of victory with 10 points)
– Since 2000, state legislativeincumbents have been reelected95% of the time.
6
WhatWhat’’s the Problem?s the Problem?
Effects on civility & partisanEffects on civility & partisancooperationcooperation
Politically lopsided districts makePolitically lopsided districts makeelections less competitive and voterselections less competitive and votersless powerfulless powerful
Harder to get new blood and freshHarder to get new blood and freshideas into the legislatureideas into the legislature
Continued
7
WhatWhat’’s the Problem?s the Problem?
Effects on civility & partisanEffects on civility & partisancooperationcooperation
They contribute to hyperThey contribute to hyper--partisan,partisan,polarized politics that makepolarized politics that makecompromise nearly impossible oncompromise nearly impossible oncontroversial issues.controversial issues.
OneOne--sided districts tend to producesided districts tend to producecandidates who appeal to just onecandidates who appeal to just oneside.side.
Continued
8
WhatWhat’’s the Problem?s the Problem?
Effects on civility & partisanEffects on civility & partisancooperationcooperation
Squeezed out are candidates whoSqueezed out are candidates whoappeal to independents or voters ofappeal to independents or voters ofboth parties.both parties.
The result is a legislature of fierceThe result is a legislature of fiercepartisans, with fewer memberspartisans, with fewer memberswilling to reach across the politicalwilling to reach across the politicaldivide to get the publicdivide to get the public’’s businesss businessdone.done.
Continued
9
WhatWhat’’s the Problem?s the Problem?
CostCost
Depending on whose tally you believe, the totalDepending on whose tally you believe, the totalamount spent on redistricting a decade ago wasamount spent on redistricting a decade ago wassomewhere between $2.6 million and $2.9somewhere between $2.6 million and $2.9million for sophisticated mapmillion for sophisticated map--drawingdrawingtechnology, technical experts and politicaltechnology, technical experts and politicalconsultants to help them draw new district linesconsultants to help them draw new district linesas well as attorneys to represent legislativeas well as attorneys to represent legislativeleaders in court.leaders in court.
Continued
10
Can we Take the PoliticsCan we Take the Politicsout of Redistricting?out of Redistricting?
How do we get legislators toHow do we get legislators tochange a system that gives themchange a system that gives themcontrol?control?
Why would legislators want to giveWhy would legislators want to giveup that control?up that control?
11
Can we Take the PoliticsCan we Take the Politicsout of Redistricting?out of Redistricting?
ItIt’’s hard to persuade people that reform iss hard to persuade people that reform isnecessarynecessary
– Most citizens don’t think about redistrictingvery often
– It’s hard to explain why it’s important –particularly if you weren’t affected last time
Continued
12
• Legislatures (36 states)
• Nonpartisan legislative agency draws mapfor legislature to adopt (Iowa)
• Advisory commissions to help
• Backup commissions if legislature fails
• Political commissions – membersappointed by politicians (7 states)
• Independent commissions (6 states)
How is it done?How is it done?
13
How should it be doneHow should it be donePrinciples for effectivePrinciples for effective
redistrictingredistricting
Meaningful independence
Meaningful diversity
Meaningful guidance
Meaningful participation
14
Meaningful IndependenceMeaningful Independence
Those who draw the lines should not be directbeneficiaries
Those who draw the lines should not becontrolled by direct beneficiaries
One of the players shouldn’t also be the umpire
15
Meaningful DiversityMeaningful Diversity
Those who draw the lines should reflectthe state, county or municipality
Need redistricting body of sufficient size
Need rules/incentives to choose diversemembership
16
Meaningful GuidanceMeaningful Guidance
Criteria that reflect basic goals
Enough flexibility to accommodate localexceptions
Communities of interest
Voter majority is legislative majority
17
Meaningful ParticipationMeaningful Participation
Process that encourages community inputbefore and after drafts
Encouraging input from diverse voices inthe community
Testimony regarding who arecommunities of interest
18
5 members
– 2 R, 2D, 1 I
Not more than 2 from a county
Chosen by legislators from pool withcommittee choosing the 5th
No candidates, party officials or lobbyists
ArizonaArizona
19
Equal population
to the extend practicable
– Geographically compact and contiguous
– Respect community interests
– Visible geographic features, county andmunicipal boundaries and censusboundaries
– Competitive districts should be favoredwhere to do so would create no significantdetriment to the other goals.
Arizona CriteriaArizona Criteria
20
No initial use of party registration andinitial use of party registration and
voting datavoting data
No use of information on incumbentNo use of information on incumbentresidenceresidence
Draft to be presented to the public andDraft to be presented to the public andcomments on the draft to be consideredcomments on the draft to be considered
Arizona CriteriaArizona CriteriaContinued
21
Arizona, which is the only state to requirecompetitiveness as a redistrictingcriterion, was in litigation over its 2001maps for seven years. Opponents of themaps drawn by Arizona’s independentredistrict commission unsuccessfullychallenged that the maps were notsufficiently competitive.
Arizona CriteriaArizona CriteriaContinued
22
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11
Step One: Any of California’sapproximately 15 million registered votersmay apply
Step Two: The independent State Auditorselects a panel of three independent auditorsto screen applicants.
23
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11
Step Three: The panel of auditors choosesthree “sub-pools” of 20 persons each
– from the 60 most qualified persons who haveapplied.
• 20 Democrats,
• 20 Republicans, and
• 20 others.
Continued
24
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11
Step Four: The four legislative leaders(Assembly Speaker and Minority Leader,and Senate President pro Tem and MinorityLeader) may each strike two people fromeach 20 person “sub-pool.”
Continued
25
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11
Step Five: The three auditors randomlyselect eight commissioners:
• 3 Democrats,
• 3 Republicans, and
• 2 others.
Continued
26
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11
Step Six: The eight commissioners selectsix more members from sub-pools
– The final Citizens Redistricting Commissionhas 14 members:
• 5 Democrats,
• 5 Republicans, and
• 4 others
Continued
27
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11
The independent commission must approve itsredistricting maps by a supermajority voteof 9 out of 14 members. Moreover, themajority must consist of at least 3 of the 5Democrats, 3 of the 5 Republicans and 3 ofthe 4 “Decline to States” or representativesof other parties.
Continued
28
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11Redistricting CriteriaRedistricting Criteria
Geographic contiguity – Respect for geographic integrityof neighborhoods, city and county boundaries, andcommunities of interest, without violating the requirementsof the previous criteria.
Geographic compactness to the extent practicable andwhere it does not conflict with the criteria above.
No consideration of the place of residence of anyincumbent or political candidate in the creation of a map.
Don’t favor or discriminate against an incumbent, politicalcandidate or political party.
29
The following redistricting criteria (in order ofpriority) must be followed
in drawing legislative district lines. Districts must:
– have reasonably equal population
– comply with the federal Voting Rights Act
– be geographically contiguous (connected)
– respect counties, cities, communities of interest and
neighborhoods·
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11Continued
30
– · to the extent there is no conflict with the criteriaabove, districts should be
• geographically compact, and nested
• not be drawn to favor or discriminate againstincumbents, candidates or parties.
• Incumbent addresses may not be considered.
CaliforniaCalifornia –– Prop 11Prop 11
Continued
31
IowaIowa
A nonpartisan legislative staff agency drawsa map
The legislature accepts or rejects it
After the legislature has rejected two sets ofplans can it draw districts as it pleases.
(this hasn’t happened yet)
32
Local and Regional Interests
– Urban/suburban/rural splits
Minority Interests
– Can Latinos elect an alder?
Why is Redistricting so Hard?Why is Redistricting so Hard?Or,Or,
Maybe the LegislatorsMaybe the Legislators shouldshould bebehappy to have someone else do it!happy to have someone else do it!
33
Party Interests– How will balance of power in the
legislature change?
Individual legislators– How will my district change?
Citizen Interests– New legislator?
– New polling place?
– More or less competition?
Why is it so Hard?Why is it so Hard?Continued
34
TEACH
There’s no perfect map, rather an endlessnumber each with its own imperfection
One problem is the criteria aren’t fixed in a rankorder. It would be a lot easier if you could applya, then apply b, then apply c.
But even then, the map is going to look differentif you start at the northwest corner of the countyrather than the southeast corner, because everydecision drives the next one.
What can you do?What can you do?
35
Important LessonsImportant Lessons
The Mapping Project – George MasonUniversity
http://http://elections.gmu.edu/Redistricting.htelections.gmu.edu/Redistricting.ht
mlml
36
Important LessonsImportant Lessons
Equal population districts must be ofunequal geographic size; urban districtsmust be smaller than rural districts
Nicely-shaped districts are difficult todraw using census blocks; and mayconflict with respecting existing politicalboundaries
37
Important LessonsImportant Lessons
Redistricting criteria can have predictablepartisan and racial effects
If goals like partisan fairness orcompetition are desired, they should becodified into law, just as we do withminority representation goals described inthe Voting Rights Act
38
Try to keep decision makers frommaking mistakes – if you can.
Remind them of things they can’tdo.
Point out potential problems..
What can you do?What can you do?
39
Aim for the ideal
Be flexible
Have standards and apply themuniformly
Things that helpThings that help
40
Know who has authority!
Understand the timeline
Say you can’t meet it immediately
– What do you need to meet the timeline?
– Staff? Equipment?
Things that helpThings that help
41
Legislators get REALLY nervous at redistrictingtime. After all, it’s their districts on the line.
Don’t take things personally.
Most members assume the plan should originatefrom their own district.
Expect some irrational choices.
Don’t play on the freeway. Stay out of fightsbetween members – unless it’s your job to resolvethem.
From Thomas B. Hofeller, Redistricting Coordinator, Republican NationalCommittee
Things that helpThings that help
42
Remember that “bad news, unlike finewine, does not age well.” Let people knowabout problems as they develop.
If bad news has to be given to a member,let the attorneys or outside experts deliverit – if possible. That’s what they’re paid todo.
From Thomas B. Hofeller, Redistricting Coordinator, RepublicanNational Committee
Things that helpThings that help
43
Understand the local rules
– Who can make suggestions.
– Who shouldn’t see the plan.
Find out what everybody knows, but didn’t tellyou!
– You never split the village of X
– Y is an important boundary
Things that helpThings that help
44
YOU CANYOU CAN’’T MAKET MAKEEVERYBODYEVERYBODY
HAPPY!HAPPY!
45
Exercise reduces stress
Things that helpThings that help
46
http://http://www.wisdc.orgwww.wisdc.org//
Peter CannonPeter Cannon
apcannon@gmail.comapcannon@gmail.com
(608) 251(608) 251--12761276
top related