sustainable manufacturing poster

Post on 08-Jul-2015

479 Views

Category:

Business

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Winner of the first prize poster for the School of Engineering. University of Liverpool March 2010 Abstract. Industrial waste represents 43.5 million tons of waste generated annually in the UK. This research, in recognising that current manufacturing processes are not 100% efficient and considering the burden on the environment under the current climate, political and economical situation, aims to develop a methodology and engineering tools to analyze, transform and market industry’s waste into competitive co-products that add to the triple bottom line of a company. http://www.liv.ac.uk/media/livacuk/pgr-development/posterday/Poster,Day,2010.pdf

TRANSCRIPT

Reincorporate

Store

ExtractReplace

Perform

Incorporate

AIR

EMISSIONS

WATER

EMISSIONS

SOLID

RESIDUES

HEAT, VIBRATION,

NOISE

Figu re 5 . Fu n da m en ta l u s es of wa s te

ABSTRACT:In du s tr ia l wa s te rep res en ts 43 .5 m illion ton s of wa s te gen era ted a n n u a lly in th e UK. Th is res ea rch , in recogn is in g th a t cu rren t

m a n u fa ctu r in g proces s es a re n ot 100% efficien t a n d con s ider in g th e bu rden on th e en viron m en t u n der th e cu rren t clim a te,

polit ica l a n d econ om ica l s itu a t ion , a im s to develop a m eth odology a n d en gin eer in g tools to a n a lyze, t ra n s form a n d m a rket

in du s try’s wa s te in to com pet it ive co-p rodu cts th a t a dd to th e tr ip le bot tom lin e of a com pa n y.

S u s t a I n a b l e M a n u f a c t u r I n g

Do not waste your cash, cash your waste!

Sus tainable development: is developm en t th a t m eets th e n eeds of th e p res en t with ou t

com prom is in g th e a b ility of fu tu re gen era t ion s to m eet th eir own n eeds [1 ].

Th e s im ple defin it ion of s us tainability is im provin g th e qu a lity of h u m a n life wh ile livin g with in th e

ca r ryin g ca pa city of s u ppor t in g eco-s ys tem s [2 ].

Wa s te gen era t ion in Fig. 1 reflects environmental is s u es

of res ou rce dep let ion , economical is s u es of res ou rce

p rodu ct ivity a n d s ocial con cern s a bou t la n dfills a n d

toxic wa s tes .

Figu re. 1 . Es t im a ted wa s te a r is in g by s ector : 2004 [4 ]

Figu re 2 . Accu m u la t ion of econ om ic va lu e a n d en viron m en ta l

im pa ct a lon g th e s u pp ly ch a in [6 ]

Figu re 3 . Ma ter ia l a n d m on ey flows in a pa in t s h op . [7 ]

Figu re 2 illu s t ra tes p reviou s res ea rch

in th e field h a s s h own th a t th e ea r ly

s ta ges of a p rodu ct’s life cycle h a ve th e

m os t en viron m en ta l im pa ct wh ils t

a dd in g th e lea s t econ om ic va lu e [5 ].

Th e m a ter ia l flow ba la n ce in ph ys ica l term s con s iders

Ou tpu ts a ll p rodu cts , wa s tes a n d em is s ion s th a t lea ve

a n orga n iza t ion . Produ ct Ou tpu ts (PO) a re p rodu cts a n d

by-p rodu cts in clu d in g th eir pa cka gin g. Non -Produ ct

ou tpu ts com pris e s olid wa s te, wa s tewa ter a n d a ir

em is s ion s . An y ou tpu t th a t is n ot a Produ ct Ou tpu t is by

defin it ion a Non -Produ ct Ou tpu t (NPO).

“In Ma ter ia l Flow Cos t Accou n t in g (MFCA) wa s te is t rea ted a s a s epa ra te

n ega t ive p rodu ct , p roper a m ou n ts of cos ts a re a lloca ted to it in p ropor t ion to

th e weigh ts of p rodu ct a n d n on p rodu ct ou tpu t” [7 ], in th is wa y MFCA

a t tem pts to ca p tu re th e t ru e cos t of wa s te (Figu re 3 ).

Ba s ed on th is u n ders ta n d in g, th is res ea rch led to th e developm en t of a m odel to

a n a lyze th e por t folio of a n orga n iza t ion ’s ou tpu ts .

In en terp r is e en viron m en ts th e term Tr ip le Bot tom Lin e (TBL) is u s ed a s a fra m ework for

m ea s u r in g a n d repor t in g corpora te per form a n ce a ga in s t economic , s ocial a n d

environmental pa ra m eters of s u s ta in a b ility [3 ].

Th e n ew m odel s h own in figu re 4 , developed a s pa r t of th is res ea rch , cou ld be u s ed to

s u ppor t s t ra tegic decis ion m a k in g rega rd in g th e ou tpu ts of a n orga n iza t ion , th e key

in s igh t from th is m odel is th a t th ere is a poten t ia l to t ra n s form wa s te ou tpu t in to

com pet it ive co-p rodu ct ou tpu t . An exten s ive litera tu re review a cros s d is cip lin es h a s

revea led th e fu n da m en ta l u s es of wa s te (figu re 5 ).

Au th or : Sa m u el Ba u t is ta La zo

s a ba la @liv.a c.u k

Su pervis or : Dr . Tim Sh or t .

Manufacturing and Las er Engineering

SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

1 . Bru n d t la n d , H., et a l., Report of th e W orld Com m is s ion on En viron m en t an d Developm en t: Ou r Com m on Fu tu re . 1987 , UNITED NATIONS: Os low, Norwa y.

2 . IUCN/ UNEP/ WWF, Carin g for th e Earth : a s trategy for s u s tain ab le livin g , Gla n d , Ed itor . 1991 , Com m u n ica t ion s for a s u s ta in a b le fu tu re: Switzer la n d .

3 . Elk in gton , J ., Towards th e s u s tain ab le corporat ion : win -win -win bu s in es s s trategies for s u s tain ab le developm en t . Ca liforn ia Ma n a gem en t Review, 1994 . 36 (2 ): p . 90 -100 .

4 . DEFRA. Key facts abou t: W as te an d Recyclin g. [Web s ite] 2006 09 / 28 / 20 06 [cited 2010 03 / 17 / 2010 ]; Ava ila b le from : h t tp :/ / www.defra .gov.u k / eviden ce/ s ta t is t ics / en viron m en t/ wa s te/ k f/ wrkf0 2 .h tm .

5 . Clift , R. a n d L. Wrigh t , Relat ion s h ips B etween En viron m en tal Im pacts an d Added Valu e Alon g th e S u pp ly Ch ain . Tech n ologica l Foreca s t in g a n d Socia l Ch a n ge, 2000 . 65 (3 ): p . 281 -295 .

6 . Clift , R., Metrics for s u pp ly ch ain s u s tain ab ility . Clea n Tech n ologies a n d En viron m en ta l Policy, 2003 . 5 (3 ): p . 240 -247 .

7 . J a s ch , C., En viron m en tal an d Material Flow Cos t Accou n t in g . Eco-Efficien cy in In du s try a n d Scien ce, ed . A. Tu kker ,TNO-STB,&T.N. Delft . Vol. 25 . 2009 , Vien n a , Au s tr ia : Spr in ger Scien ce + Bu s in es s Med ia BV

1. INTRODUCTION

WASTE

CO-PRODUCT

Figu re 4 . Ou tpu t por t folio a n a lys is .

Q1 ProductQ2 Waste

- £ Loss

£ Profit

Critical

Leader

Strategic

Error

Inefficiency

Unavoidable

Compliance

Upgrader

Alchemy Maximicers

Enablers

Satisficers

Q = quantity

top related