storage for vdi

Post on 10-Jun-2015

840 Views

Category:

Technology

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

This presentation, delivered by Howard Marks at Interop in Las Vegas May 2013 explores how system administrators can provide high performance storage for VDI implementations.

TRANSCRIPT

Storage for VDI

Or why storage vendors love VDI

VDI Looks Ready To Take Off

When will you deploy VDI?

3 Months 3-6 Months6-9 Months 9-12 Months12+ Months

Have you started a VDI pilot?

54%

46% Yes

No

Source: VIBriefing survey March 2012

But There’s a Disconnect

Reasons for VDI

43%

Better Endpoint ManagementLower cost"Cloud"Security

Reasons for VDI stall

31%

29%

22%

19%

Cost Performance

Software Licensing Storage Cost

Source: VIBriefing survey March 2012

Desktop Virtualization Expenses

4

Source: Gartner Dataquest

41%24%

8%8%

1%

Everyone’s Talking VDI

• 76% are choosing VDI to:– Save Costs– Improve management

• 54% project total cost <$500– One writer claimed <$200 VDI cost

• 80% Prefer persistent desktops for knowledge workers

Virsto sponsored survey of 500 IT professionals 3/2012

The Sad Truth

• Most success stories are task workers– Call centers, healthcare, Etc

• Much of your desktop support is user support• Enterprise storage is expensive• VDI creates high IOP density• According to that same Virsto study, 46% of

the VDI projects are stalled – Because of performance and/or cost

VDI and Storage

• Desktop disk:– 30-40GB, 100 IOPS – 200 desktops = 6TB, 20,000 IOPS– 100+ 15K RPM drives RAID 10

• Windows 7 with AV 2x IOPS of WinXP• VDI user steady state IOPS

– Light 6-12– Power 5-40

• But you need to plan for peak

VDI Presents Unique Workloads

• Highly variable but coincident (boot/login in morning)• Steady state 50+% write

200 Desktop VDI Storage Performance Demands

Anatomy of a Linked Clone• Master Replica

– Common data

• Delta Disk – Accumulates changes

from master per clone

• Disposable– Swap, Temp Etc.

• Persistent (Opt)– Additional drive letter– Permanent data

Plus The Persona• Roaming Profile

– Redirected \USERS\RacerX– Copied to C: on login– Issues:

• Long login/logout• Disk space consumption

– Especially on shared systems

• More granular approaches like View Persona Management better

About Desktop Persistence

• Non-Persistent desktops– Delta disk discarded at shutdown/logout– For task workers

• Persistent linked clones– Preserve delta disk, persistent disk– Allows centralized patching via re-composition

• Full clones– Complete virtual PC

Living with Linked Clones

• Constant growth– At VMware 1GB/user/week– Can overwhelm initial savings

• IOP concentration on Master Replica– Good use of a little flash

• Recomposing resets non-persona data– Installed Applications

• Browser plugins, Etc.

Basic VDI Recommendations

• Use linked clones or deduped full clones• Put master image on flash (many reads)

– More IOPS to Delta during steady state though

• Separate differencing data– User profiles– Swaps

• Try to avoid IOPS to spinning disk– Use RAM or flash

• $/IOP not $/GB

View Storage Accelerator

• AKA Content Based Read Cache• Up to 2GB RAM as a read cache• Content Based means cache is deduped • Most effective at boot

– Cause that’s when lots of common data reads

View Storage Accelerator vs. Boot Storm

And vs. AV Scan Storm

Atlantis ILIO

• Dedupes data• Accumulates writes to 64KB• Larger read and write RAM Cache• Can install on each host or Top of Rack

The Good News

• VDI Images are just desktops– HA may be less important than performance– I would use a single controller Flash system

• All the storage startups are validating VDI solutions

• Local storage could be an answer– Especially for non-persistent clones– Consider local SSD, SSD caching RAID

controller

Things to look for in VDI Storage

• Substantial flash component – 10% or more– All flash for cast of thousands

• Good snapshots– EG: Nimble, TinTri, NetApp

• VAAI Xcopy integration• Data Deduplication

– Greenbytes, Pure, Astute for all flash– TinTri, Tegile, Nexgen hybrids

Server Flash Caching Advantages

• Take advantage of lower latency– Especially w/PCIe flash card/SSD

• Data written to back end array– So not captive in failure scenario

• Works with any array– Or DAS for that matter

• Allows focused use of flash– Put your dollars just where needed– Match SSD performance to application

• Politics: Server team not storage team solution

Server Side Caching State of The Art

• Proximal Data, Flashsoft (Sandisk) install in hypervisor– But are write through cache

• Speeds reads but passes writes through

• Most others are server only (agent based)• Write back is coming

– Will write to SSD in n servers (n=2-3)– Will require low latency net – PernixData 1st more coming

Full Clones and Deduplication

• Full clones manage like desktops– Good news if you manage desktops

• But most people don’t use Kace or LANdesk

• Full clones are fully persistent • Deduplication reduces swap space too

– 100 new linked clones = 200GB swap reserve

• Flash eliminates read performance penalties• Inline better than post process for live data

The Don’ts

• Don’t use RAID-5 spinning disks for VDI– VDI workloads have lots of small writes– RAID-5 amplifies 3-6:1

• Expect an all disk solution to serve >50 users– Conventional wisdom = dedicated storage

• Expect $100/user costs• Limit your options to established

vendors/products

Questions and Contact

• Contact info:– Hmarks@deepstorage.net – @DeepStoragenet on Twitter

top related