state of florida department of transportation · · 2012-05-14state of florida department of...
Post on 07-May-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
State of Florida Department of Transportation
Flexible Pavement Smoothness Acceptance Report Ride Number Edition
FDOT Office State Materials Office
Research Report Number
FL/DOT/SMO/12-551
Authors Charles Holzschuher
Stacy Scott Joshua C. Whitaker
Kyle Kroodsma
Date of Publication May 2012
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
This report is a result of the dedicated effort and contribution by the following individuals:
Gregory BecknerWilliam BryantCharles HolzschuherKyle KroodsmaMelissa LiraAlexander MrazGlenn SalvoJohn Schiffermuller
Joshua C. Whitaker
To access the electronic copy of this and other reports, please follow the steps below:Logon to the State Materials Office's website, located at the following URL:
Under
1)
2)
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/statematerialsofficeMost Requested , select Research Reports
** Title 23, U.S.C., Section 409, provides that this information provided to you is not subjectto discovery nor is it admissible into evidence.
Stacy Scott
i
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
ii
Table of Contents
List of Figures .................................................................................................................................List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................Introduction .....................................................................................................................................Observations ...................................................................................................................................Statewide Ride Statistics .................................................................................................................District 1 Ride Statistics ..................................................................................................................
A1Appendix - A: International Roughness Index Report Summary ......................................................
v
vii
1
3
7
9
21
29
37
45
53
61
69
District 2 Ride Statistics ..................................................................................................................District 3 Ride Statistics ..................................................................................................................District 4 Ride Statistics ..................................................................................................................District 5 Ride Statistics ..................................................................................................................District 6 Ride Statistics ..................................................................................................................District 7 Ride Statistics ..................................................................................................................
B1Appendix - B: Customer Service Form ............................................................................................
iii
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
iv
List of Figures
Statewide Ride Distribution .....................................................................................................Statewide Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ....................................................
PageNo.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
District 1 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ......................................................District 1 Ride Distribution .......................................................................................................
9
10
21
22
29
30
37
38
45
46
53
54
61
62
69
70
District 2 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ......................................................District 2 Ride Distribution .......................................................................................................
District 3 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ......................................................District 3 Ride Distribution .......................................................................................................
District 4 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ......................................................District 4 Ride Distribution .......................................................................................................
District 5 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ......................................................District 5 Ride Distribution .......................................................................................................
District 6 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ......................................................District 6 Ride Distribution .......................................................................................................
District 7 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System ......................................................District 7 Ride Distribution .......................................................................................................
v
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
vi
List of Tables
Statewide Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ..................PageNo.
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
Statewide Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and MaterialTransfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Statewide Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time .....Lane Miles Tested Per District by Friction Course and System ...............................................
Statewide Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and Material
District 1 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ...................District 1 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Material
District 1 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time .......
District 1 Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and Material
District 2 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ...................District 2 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Material
District 2 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time .......
District 2 Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and Material
District 3 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ...................District 3 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Material
District 3 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time .......
District 3 Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and Material
District 4 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ...................District 4 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Material
District 4 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time .......
District 4 Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and Material
District 5 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ...................District 5 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Material
District 5 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time
11
13
14
15
17
23
25
26
28
31
32
33
35
39
40
41
43
47
48
49
51
55
57
58
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
5 Statewide Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ............... 16
10 District 1 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ................ 27
30 District 5 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ................ 59
15 District 2 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ................ 34
20 District 3 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ................ 42
25 District 4 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ................ 50
vii
PageNo.
36
37
38
39
41
District 6 Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and MaterialTransfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
District 7 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ...................District 7 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Material
District 7 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time .......
District 7 Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and Material
67
71
72
73
75
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
34 District 6 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Paving Time ....... 65
31
32
33
District 5 Statistical Summary by Contractor, Friction Course, Aggregate, and Material
District 6 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Year, and Aggregate ...................District 6 Statistical Summary by Friction Course, System, Aggregate, and Material
60
63
64
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
Transfer Device Status ........................................................................................................
35 District 6 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ................ 66
40 District 7 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year ................ 74
List of Tables, continued
viii
Executive Summary
The traveling public wants smooth, safe, and long lasting pavements. Initial pavement smoothnesshas been shown to improve the overall pavement performance. The Florida Department ofTransportation (FDOT) has developed smoothness specifications for the acceptance of asphaltpavements on high-speed facilities that incorporate smoothness results obtained with high-speedinertial laser profilers.
This report is a synthesis of statewide project smoothness data collected from January 2005through December 2011, including more than 9,000 miles and 93,000 lots. It provides the end userwith basic statistics on the Ride quality of projects tested for Ride Acceptance (RA). The dataanalyzed herein consists of all lots greater than or equal to 0.01 mile and less than or equal to 0.1mile in length.
This report expresses ride quality using Ride Number (RN). Currently. FDOT's smoothnessspecifications use RN to indicate the level of smoothness present on newly placed asphaltpavements. RN, howevere, is freatly influenced by differences in texture, especially dense-gradedversus open-graded pavements.
** Title 23, U.S.C., Section 409, provides that this information provided to you is not subjectto discovery nor is it admissible into evidence.
1
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
2
Introduction
According to National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) project 1-31, conductedbetween February 1994 and December 1996 and published as NCHRP Web Document 1,"Smoothness Specifications for Pavements," the importance of pavement smoothness to thetraveling public is undisputed. Smooth-riding pavements provide comfort, allow more efficientmovement of vehicles over the roadway, raise optimum travel speeds, maintain traffic flow, reducesafety hazards to users and their vehicles, and may increase fuel efficiency, leading to lowertraveling costs to roadway users. Pavement smoothness also imparts a positive reflection on theconstruction and maintanance proficiency of the owner agency, be it a state agency, city, county, ortoll authority. In addition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO) pavement design models suggest that initially smooth pavements last longer thaninitially rough pavements, though this has been never confirmed through long-term fieldinvestigation (AASHTO design equations are based on only 2 years of performance data).
Ride quality has been used by FDOT for evaluating new construction, overlay projects, special ridequality evaluations used for informational purposes, and for monitoring long-term pavementperformance at the network level. To measure pavement ride quality, automated or manualmethods can be used to measure roadway profiles from which a roughness value is calculated.Most states, including Florida, use high-speed inertial profilers to measure smoothness. Thecommonly used measures of roughness (or smoothness) are the International Roughness Index(IRI) and Ride Number (RN). Since 1998, FDOT has been using the RN for project levelacceptance and evaluation in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)E1489.
FDOT RIDE QUALITY
The FDOT has worked very closely with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and theconstruction industry to improve pavement smoothness on Florida's state highways. To this end, asmoothness task team was created with representatives from FDOT, FHWA, and the pavingindustry to develop and implement non-contact profiler based smoothness specifications.Sub-article 330-12.4.6 of the FDOT Standard Specifications sets the requirements for AcceptanceTesting for Pavement Smoothness by Laser Profiler.
3
RIDE QUALITY EVALUATION PROCESS
The Pavement Condition Unit of the State Materials (SMO) is responsible for conductingsmoothness evaluation using an high-speed inertial laser profiler. Florida Test Method Fm 5-549,"Laser Profiler Roughness Evaluation," provides the method by which a pavement section isevaluated for smoothness using the longitudinal profiles recorded from each wheel path using asinertial profiler test vehicle.
The test vehicle is driven along the wheel paths of the pavement section to be evaluated and usesa system of three laser sensors and two accelerometers mounted in the front bumper of a full-sizevan. One laser is mounted in front of each tire to measure the longitudinal profile in the left andright wheel paths of the traveled surface. These 32 kHz lasers measure the vertical distancebetween the sensor and the pavement surface at a rate of 30 readings per inch as the vehicletravels at 60 mph. An accelerometer is mounted atop each of these two lasers to isolate thevehicle's vertical motion and thus provide a "zero" reference plane. The third laser, mountedequidistant from the two wheel path lasers, provides a height reading from which to calculate rutdepth. The vehicle's data acquisition system uses the accelerometer data to provide a correction tothe laser data, eliminating the effects of vehicle movement, and uses a Distance MeasuringInstrument (DMI) connected to the vehicle transmission or axle to record the longitudinal distancetraveled to summarize the corrected laser data into approximately 1 inch intervals. The exactinterval is a function of each individual vehicle's DMI calibration settings. These summary valuesare then post-processed into exactly 6 inch intervals to generate a longitudinal profile for eachwheel path as well as a combined value for both wheel paths, and an average rut depth.
The laser profilers currently in use by FDOT are manufactured by International CyberneticsCorporation (ICC) of Largo, Florida. All of these profilers are owned by FDOT with the exception ofone unit that is provided through a contract with Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA).Currently, this profiler is the primary unit used by the SMO for the collection of project levelsmoothness data.
District project personnel may submit all requests for pavement evaluation using online requestforms available at the SMO's website:
Intranet:Internet:
http://materials.dot.state.fl.us/smo/pavement/pavementhome.htm
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/statematerialsoffice/pavement/index.shtm
4
WHAT IS RIDE NUMBER?
The Pavement Serviceability Index (PSI) has been used by engineers since the AASHTO road testin the 1950's as an estimate of the opinion of the traveling public on the roughness (or lack ofsmoothness) of roads. The Ride Number (RN) is a profile index similar to the PSI, and was a resultof NCHRP projects 1-23, conducted between January 1982 and November 1984 and published asNCHRP report 275, "Pavement Roughness and Rideability," and 1-23(2), conductd betweenJanuary 1986 and December 1987 and published as NCHRP Report 308, "Pavement Roughnessand Rideability - Field Evaluation." It is an index that rates rideability of a road using a 0 to 5 scale,where an RN of 5.0 is considered to be a perfect ride quality road, and an RN of zero is animpassable road. The RN was chosen because it corresponds to users' perception of pavementroughness. The definition of this method is given in Section 4.3.2 of ASTM E1489. The ProfileIndex (PI), equation (2), statistic is derived from the longitudinal profile and then processed througha non-linear mathematical transformation, equation (1), to yield RN value(s) for each 0.1 mile orany other desired reporting interval.
The RN is defined by the following equation:
PIeRN 1605
2
22RL PIPI
PI
Where:
PI = Profile Index in the Right wheel path (ft/ft)R
PI = Profile Index in the Left wheel path (ft/ft)L
............................................................... (1)
(2)...............................................................
5
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
6
In addition to these factors, there are many other variables that the data can be subdivided by. Ifany additional information is needed, please contact the following people.
Stacy ScottKyle KroodsmaCharles Holzschuher
stacy.scott@dot.state.fl.uskyle.kroodsma@dot.state.fl.uscharles.holzschuher@dot.state.fl.us
(352) 955-6328(352) 955-6332(352) 955-6341
Material Transfer Device (MTD) Usage - Data shows that pavements placed using thisequipment can be smoother. Overall, full MTD usage on the entire project shows nosignificant improvement over no MTD usage, both having an average RN of 4.2. MTDusage on the Interstate system yielded some benefit; 4.2 RN with full-project MTD usageversus 4.0 for Interstate projects where the MTD was not used at all.
Aggregate Type - Based on summary data from Florida projects, smooth pavements can beconstructed regardless of the aggregate type used. However, on average, pavements usingGranite aggregate in friction courses are smoother. Granite pavements have an averageRN of 4.2, compared to an RN of 4.0 for Limestone pavements.
Binder Type - No significant difference was found when comparing the smoothness ofpavements using polymer-modified binders in the friction course to pavements using othertypes of binders.
Data by Year - No significant improvement was found when comparing the average RNover time.
Paving Time - No significant difference was found when comparing the smoothness ofpavements placed at Night to those placed during the Day.
System - No significant difference was found when comparing the smoothness of Primaryand Interstate systems.
Observations
Many roadway characteristics and construction practices are being monitored and included in theFDOT's smoothness database. Some of these have proven to be significant contributors to the ridequality of the pavements tested, and some factors have not been so valuable. Below is a summarylist of key variables being monitored with a brief explanation of their effect on pavementsmoothness.
Surface Type - It is well documented that pavements with dense-graded friction courses areconsistently smoother, in terms of RN, than those with open-graded friction courses.Dense-graded friction courses have an average RN of 4.3, compared to 4.1 foropen-graded friction courses.
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - Analysis on Interstate pavements has shown that150,000 AADT or greater exhibit lower average RNs. Interstate pavements with AADT lessthan 150,000 have an average RN of 4.1, compared to an RN of 3.9 for Interstatepavements with AADT equal to or greater than 150,000.
7
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
8
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 1: Statewide Ride Distribution, All Lots
Statewide
9098.18 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
93264 9098.18 1.2 4.1 4.7 0.20 737 65.97All Lots 0.73%
9
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 2: Statewide Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 2925.88 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.52.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Toll ‐ 22.47 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.52.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 3433.70 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 934.94 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 1781.20 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
29880 2925.88 1.2 4.1 4.6 0.18 309 27.61FC5 Primary 0.94%243 22.47 3.3 4.1 4.3 0.12 1 0.02FC5 Toll 0.07%
35474 3433.70 2.1 4.1 4.4 0.17 364 32.94FC5 Interstate 0.96%9519 934.94 2.1 4.4 4.7 0.13 9 0.57FC9.5 Primary 0.06%
18148 1781.20 2.9 4.3 4.6 0.15 54 4.85FC12.5 Primary 0.27%
10
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
1:
Sta
tew
ide
Sta
tis
tic
al
Su
mm
ary
by
Fri
cti
on
Co
urs
e,
Sys
tem
, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te
0.5
2%
20
05
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
11
841
17.
11
3.3
4.1
4.3
0.1
37
0.6
11
.32
%2
00
5F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
92
98
7.5
13
.33
.94
.30
.15
15
1.1
60
.68
%2
00
6F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
477
14
4.7
32
.24
.04
.30
.16
12
0.9
91
.89
%2
00
6F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
17
501
71.
24
1.2
4.0
4.3
0.1
74
03
.24
0.1
6%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
37
443
69.
77
2.4
4.1
4.4
0.1
17
0.5
92
.81
%2
00
7F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
30
493
00.
31
2.4
3.9
4.3
0.1
89
08
.43
0.1
2%
20
08
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
32
063
14.
84
3.3
4.1
4.4
0.1
25
0.3
81
.50
%2
00
8F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
14
331
39.
66
2.8
4.0
4.3
0.1
52
62
.09
0.0
9%
20
09
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
36
153
52.
37
3.3
4.1
4.4
0.1
34
0.3
24
.29
%2
00
9F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
18
131
78.
34
3.1
3.9
4.4
0.2
17
87
.65
0.0
4%
20
10
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
26
562
57.
75
3.2
4.2
4.5
0.1
41
0.1
00
.15
%2
01
0F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
15
031
47.
16
3.2
4.1
4.5
0.1
43
0.2
20
.05
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
975
19
3.5
53
.54
.24
.60
.11
10
.10
1.2
0%
20
11
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
432
14
0.7
72
.74
.14
.40
.17
19
1.6
90
.00
%2
00
6F
C5
To
llG
ran
ite2
07
19
.47
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
00
.53
%2
00
6F
C5
To
llL
ime
sto
ne
36
3.0
03
.33
.94
.10
.11
10
.02
0.1
2%
20
05
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
87
08
2.9
43
.54
.04
.40
.15
10
.10
1.6
2%
20
05
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e2
205
21
2.4
12
.84
.04
.40
.19
37
3.4
50
.59
%2
00
6F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite2
669
26
1.4
42
.84
.04
.40
.16
16
1.5
46
.29
%2
00
6F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
14
201
38.
50
3.1
3.8
4.2
0.1
69
08
.71
0.3
6%
20
07
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
41
904
10.
21
3.1
4.1
4.4
0.1
61
61
.47
5.5
9%
20
07
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
721
16
4.7
83
.23
.94
.20
.18
10
09
.21
0.0
8%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
36
403
55.
96
3.2
4.1
4.4
0.1
43
0.2
91
.45
%2
00
8F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
35
003
33.
75
2.9
4.0
4.4
0.1
65
74
.84
0.1
9%
20
09
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
35
603
43.
91
3.2
4.1
4.3
0.1
27
0.6
50
.57
%2
00
9F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
22
312
15.
02
2.1
4.0
4.3
0.1
41
41
.24
0.1
2%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
36
883
59.
56
3.2
4.2
4.4
0.1
36
0.4
30
.35
%2
01
0F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
20
381
95.
02
2.2
4.0
4.3
0.1
49
0.6
80
.01
%2
01
1F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite1
499
14
5.5
03
.24
.24
.40
.13
10
.02
0.1
4%
20
11
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e2
243
21
4.7
13
.34
.14
.40
.14
70
.31
0.0
8%
20
05
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite6
25
60
.77
3.2
4.3
4.6
0.1
42
0.0
50
.22
%2
00
6F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e9
19
89
.86
2.1
4.4
4.6
0.1
53
0.2
00
.00
%2
00
7F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
98
09
6.4
53
.84
.34
.60
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
08
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
319
13
0.1
53
.94
.44
.60
.10
00
.00
0.1
1%
20
08
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
91
88
9.0
63
.44
.34
.60
.11
10
.10
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
560
15
4.1
43
.64
.34
.60
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
46
44
5.6
33
.84
.34
.50
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite7
51
74
.22
3.6
4.4
4.6
0.1
20
0.0
0
11
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
1:
Sta
tew
ide
Sta
tis
tic
al
Su
mm
ary
by
Fri
cti
on
Co
urs
e,
Sys
tem
, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te,
co
nti
nu
ed
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
50
24
9.2
73
.94
.44
.70
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
11
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite9
64
94
.96
3.6
4.4
4.7
0.1
30
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e6
96
.16
3.7
4.3
4.5
0.1
50
0.0
02
.03
%2
00
5F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite6
06
59
.51
3.0
4.1
4.5
0.1
91
41
.21
0.0
0%
20
05
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
86
47
.94
3.9
4.4
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.25
%2
00
6F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
653
16
2.4
03
.04
.34
.60
.14
40
.40
0.8
0%
20
06
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
041
10
1.9
63
.04
.24
.50
.17
90
.81
0.0
6%
20
07
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
18
411
80.
66
3.3
4.2
4.5
0.1
41
0.1
00
.00
%2
00
7F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
24
72
4.0
33
.64
.34
.50
.14
00
.00
0.0
6%
20
08
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
25
352
49.
74
3.1
4.3
4.6
0.1
32
0.1
41
.96
%2
00
8F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
49
04
7.6
23
.24
.24
.50
.20
10
0.9
30
.15
%2
00
9F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
955
19
1.6
02
.94
.34
.60
.14
30
.30
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
36
13
.53
3.7
4.2
4.4
0.1
30
0.0
00
.12
%2
01
0F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite3
843
37
7.0
03
.14
.34
.60
.14
60
.46
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
24
.10
3.6
4.0
4.5
0.2
30
0.0
00
.16
%2
01
1F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
516
24
6.9
33
.24
.34
.60
.14
40
.40
0.3
6%
20
11
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e2
80
27
.65
3.5
4.4
4.5
0.1
31
0.1
0A
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.
12
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
2:
Sta
tew
ide
Sta
tis
tic
al
Su
mm
ary
by
Fri
cti
on
Co
urs
e,
Sys
tem
, A
gg
reg
ate
, a
nd
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vice
Sta
tus
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
0.0
6%
FC
55
428
53
2.6
53
.34
.24
.60
.14
30
.30
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.11
%F
C5
20
271
94.
71
3.2
4.2
4.5
0.1
43
0.2
2G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
No
t Use
d2
.26
%F
C5
29
982
95.
27
3.1
4.0
4.4
0.1
96
96
.66
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.7
8%
FC
59
49
92
.17
3.2
4.1
4.5
0.2
08
0.7
2L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.1
2%
FC
54
735
45
8.7
03
.24
.24
.40
.12
70
.57
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
teF
ully
Use
d0
.02
%F
C5
12
031
16.
04
3.2
4.1
4.4
0.1
41
0.0
2G
ran
iteIn
ters
tate
No
t Use
d0
.03
%F
C5
22
442
18.
63
3.3
4.1
4.4
0.1
23
0.0
8L
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
teF
ully
Use
d0
.70
%F
C5
16
241
54.
54
2.2
4.0
4.3
0.1
41
31
.08
Lim
est
on
eIn
ters
tate
No
t Use
d0
.00
%F
C9.
52
208
21
8.3
53
.64
.44
.60
.13
00
.00
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%F
C9.
55
49
54
.03
3.9
4.4
4.7
0.1
10
0.0
0G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
No
t Use
d0
.00
%F
C9.
54
04
39
.78
3.9
4.5
4.7
0.1
00
0.0
0L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%F
C9.
58
07
.68
3.8
4.4
4.6
0.1
50
0.0
0L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.0
6%
FC
12
.53
536
34
6.9
33
.24
.34
.60
.13
20
.20
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.23
%F
C1
2.5
34
613
39.
20
3.1
4.3
4.6
0.1
49
0.7
7G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
No
t Use
d0
.00
%F
C1
2.5
23
62
3.3
13
.74
.34
.50
.16
00
.00
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
0%
FC
12
.53
23
.16
3.6
3.8
4.1
0.1
20
0.0
0L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
21
789
21
33
.62
3.1
4.2
4.7
0.1
88
47
.81
0.3
7%
All
All
Gra
nite
& L
ime
sto
ne
Fu
lly U
sed
99
259
61.
53
2.2
4.2
4.7
0.1
93
42
.80
0.2
9%
All
All
Gra
nite
& L
ime
sto
ne
Not
Use
d
13
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
3:
Sta
tew
ide
Sta
tis
tic
al
Su
mm
ary
by
Fri
cti
on
Co
urs
e,
Sys
tem
, A
gg
reg
ate
, a
nd
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
0.0
8%
FC
59
68
39
50
.72
3.3
4.2
4.6
0.1
38
0.8
0G
ran
iteD
ay
Pri
mar
y0
.22
%F
C5
32
99
31
8.8
93
.24
.14
.40
.14
90
.70
Gra
nite
Nig
ht
Pri
mar
y2
.50
%F
C5
58
17
57
3.1
61
.84
.04
.40
.19
15
11
4.3
0L
ime
sto
ne
Da
yP
rim
ary
2.2
1%
FC
52
39
02
32
.20
2.8
3.9
4.5
0.1
85
85
.12
Lim
est
on
eN
igh
tP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
FC
52
07
19
.47
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
0G
ran
iteN
igh
tT
oll
0.5
3%
FC
53
63
.00
3.3
3.9
4.1
0.1
11
0.0
2L
ime
sto
ne
Nig
ht
To
ll0
.04
%F
C5
25
56
25
1.3
73
.54
.24
.40
.10
10
.10
Gra
nite
Da
yIn
ters
tate
0.1
2%
FC
51
06
77
10
34
.56
2.9
4.1
4.4
0.1
41
71
.26
Gra
nite
Nig
ht
Inte
rsta
te0
.39
%F
C5
34
36
33
2.2
82
.24
.04
.30
.11
15
1.2
8L
ime
sto
ne
Da
yIn
ters
tate
3.1
0%
FC
57
76
77
40
.09
2.1
3.9
4.4
0.1
92
50
22
.92
Lim
est
on
eN
igh
tIn
ters
tate
0.0
0%
FC
9.5
35
11
34
6.4
03
.64
.44
.70
.13
00
.00
Gra
nite
Da
yP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
FC
9.5
10
33
10
1.6
73
.64
.44
.60
.14
00
.00
Gra
nite
Nig
ht
Pri
mar
y0
.08
%F
C9.
52
47
32
41
.81
2.1
4.4
4.7
0.1
33
0.2
0L
ime
sto
ne
Da
yP
rim
ary
0.3
4%
FC
9.5
30
72
9.2
43
.44
.34
.60
.17
10
.10
Lim
est
on
eN
igh
tP
rim
ary
0.0
9%
FC
12
.51
10
27
10
85
.12
3.0
4.3
4.6
0.1
41
11
.00
Gra
nite
Da
yP
rim
ary
0.4
1%
FC
12
.51
03
91
00
.19
2.9
4.2
4.6
0.1
95
0.4
1G
ran
iteN
igh
tP
rim
ary
0.5
6%
FC
12
.51
45
61
43
.40
3.0
4.2
4.5
0.1
78
0.8
0L
ime
sto
ne
Da
yP
rim
ary
0.8
9%
FC
12
.51
39
12
.86
3.5
4.2
4.5
0.1
92
0.1
1L
ime
sto
ne
Nig
ht
Pri
mar
y
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
39
95
93
924
.26
1.8
4.2
4.7
0.2
01
97
18
.49
0.4
7%
Da
yA
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
e2
68
94
25
92.1
62
.14
.14
.60
.20
34
33
0.6
51
.18
%N
igh
tA
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
e
14
FrictionCourse
Table 4: Lane Miles Tested Per District by Friction Course and System
District1
District2
District3
District4
District5
District6
District7
Total Lane Miles Tested
System
FC5 54.71655.08 508.88 283.05 855.02 779.35 297.62InterstateFC5 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.47 0.00TollFC5 89.39550.10 631.49 293.41 387.54 715.43 258.53Primary
FC9.5 6.16188.19 80.65 327.47 107.22 167.11 58.13PrimaryFC12.5 11.37472.05 767.76 156.21 32.46 233.04 108.31Primary
1,865.41Total 1,988.78 1,060.14 1,382.24 1,917.40 161.63 722.58
15
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 5: Statewide Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
75.62%2005 15 204.62 154.73 0.86%1.77FC5 Primary68.76%2006 20 315.97 217.26 1.34%4.23FC5 Primary73.74%2007 35 670.09 494.11 1.35%9.02FC5 Primary81.44%2008 31 454.50 370.17 0.54%2.47FC5 Primary76.70%2009 38 541.48 415.29 1.48%8.01FC5 Primary93.21%2010 24 404.91 377.41 0.08%0.32FC5 Primary93.26%2011 29 334.32 311.79 0.53%1.79FC5 Primary85.48%2006 2 22.47 19.21 0.07%0.02FC5 Toll70.32%2005 9 295.36 207.69 1.20%3.55FC5 Interstate52.49%2006 12 399.94 209.95 2.56%10.25FC5 Interstate65.50%2007 18 574.98 376.61 1.86%10.68FC5 Interstate77.93%2008 24 689.71 537.52 0.74%5.13FC5 Interstate84.18%2009 22 558.93 470.51 0.34%1.89FC5 Interstate87.14%2010 17 554.57 483.24 0.20%1.11FC5 Interstate88.12%2011 11 360.21 317.43 0.09%0.32FC5 Interstate98.26%2005 8 91.81 90.21 0.29%0.27FC9.5 Primary99.09%2006 10 103.10 102.15 0.19%0.20FC9.5 Primary99.19%2007 6 96.45 95.67 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary99.69%2008 13 219.21 218.52 0.05%0.10FC9.5 Primary99.09%2009 13 199.77 197.96 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary99.55%2010 8 123.49 122.93 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary99.42%2011 8 101.12 100.53 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary91.95%2005 9 107.45 98.80 1.12%1.21FC12.5 Primary96.11%2006 35 282.43 271.45 0.43%1.21FC12.5 Primary94.79%2007 22 215.79 204.56 0.05%0.10FC12.5 Primary97.55%2008 27 306.72 299.22 0.35%1.07FC12.5 Primary97.96%2009 23 213.12 208.78 0.14%0.30FC12.5 Primary98.19%2010 32 381.10 374.20 0.12%0.46FC12.5 Primary97.79%2011 27 274.58 268.52 0.18%0.50FC12.5 Primary
78.86%2005 41 699.23 551.43 0.97%6.79AllAll72.96%2006 78 1123.91 820.02 1.42%15.92AllAll75.19%2007 80 1557.31 1170.94 1.27%19.81AllAll85.35%2008 94 1670.14 1425.43 0.53%8.77AllAll85.41%2009 94 1513.30 1292.54 0.67%10.19AllAll92.74%2010 81 1464.07 1357.78 0.13%1.89AllAll93.28%2011 73 1070.23 998.27 0.24%2.61AllAll
16
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
6:
Sta
tew
ide
Sta
tis
tic
al
Su
mm
ary
by
Co
ntr
ac
tor,
Fri
cti
on
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
an
d M
ate
ria
l T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce
Sta
tus
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
15
30
15
0.9
43
.74
.24
.40
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
Fu
lly U
sed
62
55
9.6
73
.24
.14
.40
.14
10
.10
0.1
7%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d4
73
45
.14
3.6
4.0
4.2
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d1
24
12
.27
4.1
4.4
4.6
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5A
.P.A
.C.
Fu
lly U
sed
41
3.8
34
.24
.54
.60
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
A.P
.A.C
.N
ot U
sed
32
63
1.5
64
.04
.44
.50
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
.P.A
.C.
Fu
lly U
sed
93
09
0.4
63
.14
.34
.60
.12
30
.21
0.2
3%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d3
11
73
01
.47
3.3
4.2
4.4
0.1
23
0.2
50
.08
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Aja
x P
avi
ng
Ind
ust
ryF
ully
Use
d5
10
48
.60
3.2
4.2
4.4
0.1
41
0.0
20
.04
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Aja
x P
avi
ng
Ind
ust
ryN
ot U
sed
62
66
1.5
63
.54
.14
.30
.11
20
.12
0.1
9%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Aja
x P
avi
ng
Ind
ust
ryF
ully
Use
d1
01
9.9
03
.94
.54
.70
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
Aja
x P
avi
ng
Ind
ust
ryN
ot U
sed
48
54
7.5
73
.74
.44
.60
.15
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
jax
Pa
vin
g In
du
stry
Fu
lly U
sed
73
7.2
34
.24
.54
.60
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
jax
Pa
vin
g In
du
stry
No
t Use
d2
02
81
99
.60
3.3
4.2
4.5
0.1
62
0.2
00
.10
%G
ran
iteF
C5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
Fu
lly U
sed
33
03
1.7
33
.84
.14
.30
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
nd
erso
n C
olu
mb
iaN
ot U
sed
39
53
8.6
43
.64
.44
.60
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
Fu
lly U
sed
13
52
13
2.9
83
.64
.34
.50
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
nd
erso
n C
olu
mb
iaF
ully
Use
d5
93
58
.84
3.8
4.3
4.6
0.1
40
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
No
t Use
d6
70
64
.46
2.2
4.0
4.3
0.1
34
0.2
50
.39
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5A
sph
alt
Gro
up
, In
c.N
ot U
sed
48
24
5.7
13
.84
.24
.40
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
tlan
tic C
oa
stF
ully
Use
d4
24
.09
4.1
4.3
4.4
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Atla
ntic
Co
ast
Fu
lly U
sed
13
21
3.1
03
.84
.14
.30
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Be
tte
r R
oa
ds
Inc.
Fu
lly U
sed
35
03
3.6
53
.64
.04
.30
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Be
tte
r R
oa
ds
Inc.
No
t Use
d1
21
.17
3.8
4.2
4.3
0.1
80
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
9.5
Be
tte
r R
oa
ds
Inc.
No
t Use
d1
61
.57
4.0
4.3
4.5
0.1
60
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
12
.5B
ett
er
Ro
ad
s In
c.F
ully
Use
d8
11
80
.29
3.7
4.2
4.6
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
C. W
. R
ob
ert
s C
on
tra
ctin
gF
ully
Use
d6
76
.39
3.7
4.1
4.3
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5C
. W.
Ro
be
rts
Co
ntr
act
ing
Fu
lly U
sed
84
78
4.0
83
.94
.44
.60
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
C. W
. R
ob
ert
s C
on
tra
ctin
gF
ully
Use
d7
58
74
.59
3.8
4.3
4.6
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
C. W
. R
ob
ert
s C
on
tra
ctin
gF
ully
Use
d7
47
.28
4.2
4.4
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
12
.5C
. W.
Ro
be
rts
Co
ntr
act
ing
Fu
lly U
sed
19
82
19
6.1
93
.14
.04
.40
.22
60
5.9
33
.02
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5C
om
mu
nity
Asp
hal
t C
orp
.F
ully
Use
d2
39
21
.43
2.8
4.0
4.3
0.1
86
0.4
42
.05
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5C
om
mu
nity
Asp
hal
t C
orp
.N
ot U
sed
13
61
3.5
33
.74
.24
.40
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C1
2.5
Co
mm
un
ity A
sph
alt
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
10
41
0.0
74
.04
.34
.40
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsF
ully
Use
d5
09
49
.81
3.9
4.2
4.4
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
D.A
.B.
Co
nst
ruct
ors
No
t Use
d2
87
28
.57
3.9
4.2
4.4
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsN
ot U
sed
28
22
7.7
24
.04
.34
.50
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsN
ot U
sed
10
86
10
5.6
43
.74
.14
.40
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Dic
kers
on
Asp
ha
ltF
ully
Use
d
17
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
6:
Sta
tew
ide
Sta
tis
tic
al
Su
mm
ary
by
Co
ntr
ac
tor,
Fri
cti
on
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
an
d M
ate
ria
l T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce
Sta
tus
, co
nti
nu
ed
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
14
61
4.2
03
.94
.44
.50
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C9
.5D
icke
rso
n A
sph
alt
Fu
lly U
sed
10
0.9
44
.04
.34
.50
.16
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C1
2.5
Dic
kers
on
Asp
ha
ltF
ully
Use
d2
74
25
.71
3.6
4.1
4.3
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Duv
al A
sph
alt
Fu
lly U
sed
82
8.0
23
.94
.34
.40
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5D
uva
l Asp
ha
ltF
ully
Use
d5
04
.77
3.1
4.0
4.2
0.1
91
0.1
02
.10
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Duv
al A
sph
alt
No
t Use
d2
60
25
.61
4.1
4.3
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
GA
C C
ont
ract
ors
Fu
lly U
sed
13
31
3.0
43
.53
.84
.20
.15
30
.30
2.3
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ge
ne
ral A
spha
lt C
om
pa
ny
Fu
lly U
sed
53
5.0
33
.43
.74
.10
.17
50
.50
9.9
3%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ge
ne
ral A
spha
lt C
om
pa
ny
No
t Use
d5
54
54
.16
3.7
4.2
4.5
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Ha
lifa
x P
avi
ng
In
c.N
ot U
sed
32
3.1
63
.63
.84
.10
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C1
2.5
Ha
rdri
ves
of
De
lra
yN
ot U
sed
40
3.8
13
.94
.24
.30
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5H
ub
ba
rd C
onst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
70
6.1
03
.74
.14
.30
.16
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5H
ub
ba
rd C
onst
ruct
ion
No
t Use
d2
38
23
.09
3.5
4.1
4.3
0.1
42
0.2
00
.87
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5H
ub
ba
rd C
onst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
11
41
0.2
73
.33
.94
.10
.13
30
.08
0.7
4%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
J. W
. C
he
ath
am
, L
LC
.F
ully
Use
d1
61
.43
4.2
4.4
4.4
0.0
60
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
9.5
J. W
. C
he
ath
am
, L
LC
.N
ot U
sed
12
81
2.8
04
.14
.44
.50
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
Jon
es
Co
nstr
uct
ion
No
t Use
d1
86
18
.16
3.2
4.0
4.3
0.1
84
0.3
11
.73
%G
ran
iteF
C5
La
ne C
on
stru
ctio
n C
orp
.F
ully
Use
d9
69
.59
3.5
3.9
4.2
0.1
51
0.1
01
.04
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
16
61
6.4
44
.14
.34
.40
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
La
ne C
on
stru
ctio
n C
orp
.N
ot U
sed
13
81
3.5
83
.24
.24
.50
.19
20
.20
1.4
7%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
70
6.6
53
.64
.14
.40
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
No
t Use
d1
64
15
.70
3.8
4.2
4.3
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Mid
dle
sex
Co
rp.
No
t Use
d1
13
11
.07
4.0
4.4
4.5
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5M
idd
lese
x C
orp
.N
ot U
sed
11
51
1.0
43
.84
.24
.40
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5M
idd
lese
x C
orp
.N
ot U
sed
15
51
5.4
83
.64
.04
.30
.15
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5O
rla
nd
o P
avin
g C
om
pa
ny
Fu
lly U
sed
15
01
4.3
83
.54
.04
.30
.13
10
.10
0.7
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5P
& S
Pav
ing
No
t Use
d2
53
24
.75
4.1
4.4
4.5
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
P &
S P
avin
gF
ully
Use
d3
88
37
.65
3.4
4.3
4.5
0.1
21
0.0
90
.25
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
P &
S P
avin
gN
ot U
sed
45
24
4.8
63
.64
.44
.60
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
Pa
nh
an
dle
Gra
din
g &
Pa
vin
gF
ully
Use
d7
26
70
.15
3.8
4.2
4.5
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Pe
avy
an
d S
on
sF
ully
Use
d3
90
38
.50
4.0
4.4
4.6
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5P
ea
vy a
nd
So
ns
Fu
lly U
sed
10
09
.81
4.0
4.2
4.4
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Pe
avy
an
d S
on
sF
ully
Use
d8
48
.36
3.9
4.2
4.3
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Rai
ne
y A
sph
alt
No
t Use
d3
24
31
.83
3.5
4.2
4.4
0.0
91
0.1
00
.31
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
17
81
6.9
33
.54
.14
.30
.18
10
.02
0.1
1%
Gra
nite
FC
5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
75
07
3.3
73
.44
.14
.30
.12
10
.02
0.0
2%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
17
71
7.3
03
.44
.04
.40
.22
40
.40
2.3
1%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
No
t Use
d2
58
25
.57
4.1
4.5
4.7
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
9.5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
18
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
6:
Sta
tew
ide
Sta
tis
tic
al
Su
mm
ary
by
Co
ntr
ac
tor,
Fri
cti
on
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
an
d M
ate
ria
l T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce
Sta
tus
, co
nti
nu
ed
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
52
5.0
84
.04
.44
.60
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C9
.5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
70
6.8
74
.04
.24
.50
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
76
7.0
23
.23
.94
.50
.25
10
.10
1.4
2%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
S.
T.
Woo
ten
Cor
p.N
ot U
sed
56
5.3
13
.74
.14
.30
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5S
on
ny R
iley
No
t Use
d2
82
.63
3.3
4.1
4.4
0.2
82
0.1
66
.16
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Ste
ven
Co
un
ts In
c.N
ot U
sed
59
75
8.9
03
.44
.34
.50
.12
20
.20
0.3
4%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5S
up
eri
or
Asp
ha
lt In
c.N
ot U
sed
12
61
2.5
24
.04
.24
.30
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5T
am
pa
Pa
vem
ent
Co
nst
ruct
ors
Fu
lly U
sed
18
1.6
63
.63
.84
.00
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
We
ekl
ey A
spha
lt P
avi
ng
Fu
lly U
sed
24
82
4.1
23
.43
.94
.20
.15
10
.10
0.4
1%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
We
ekl
ey A
spha
lt P
avi
ng
No
t Use
d2
65
26
.43
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Wh
iteh
urst
No
t Use
dA
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.M
ate
ria
l Tra
nsf
er
De
vice
Sta
tuse
s o
f "P
art
ially
Use
d" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n" h
ave
be
en
exc
lud
ed f
rom
th
is r
ep
ort
.
19
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
20
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 3: District 1 Ride Distribution, All Lots
District 1
1865.41 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
19179 1865.41 2.1 4.1 4.7 0.19 66 5.35All Lots 0.29%
21
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 4: District 1 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 550.10 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 655.08 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 188.19 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 472.05 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
5628 550.10 2.4 4.0 4.5 0.16 35 2.68FC5 Primary 0.49%6796 655.08 3.3 4.1 4.4 0.14 4 0.35FC5 Interstate 0.05%1928 188.19 2.1 4.4 4.7 0.13 3 0.12FC9.5 Primary 0.06%4827 472.05 3.0 4.3 4.6 0.17 24 2.20FC12.5 Primary 0.47%
22
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
7:
Dis
tric
t 1
Sta
tis
tica
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m,
Ye
ar,
an
d A
gg
reg
ate
0.5
6%
20
05
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
10
39
.25
3.3
3.9
4.2
0.1
33
0.2
20
.57
%2
00
6F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
84
38
1.9
52
.84
.04
.30
.13
10
0.4
61
4.2
9%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
14
1.4
03
.43
.84
.00
.19
20
.20
0.7
0%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
325
13
0.6
52
.44
.04
.30
.17
10
0.9
10
.00
%2
00
8F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
36
13
.23
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.0
80
0.0
02
.00
%2
00
8F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
29
32
8.2
23
.43
.94
.20
.15
60
.57
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
96
19
4.3
83
.64
.14
.30
.12
00
.00
0.4
7%
20
09
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
34
42
.51
3.5
4.0
4.3
0.1
42
0.2
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite7
87
.63
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
40
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
36
03
5.3
53
.64
.04
.50
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
11
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
11
71
1.3
34
.04
.24
.40
.07
00
.00
0.1
8%
20
11
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e6
57
64
.20
3.2
4.1
4.3
0.1
32
0.1
20
.00
%2
00
5F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
59
55
8.4
33
.74
.04
.20
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
06
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
91
8.0
43
.94
.14
.20
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
06
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e5
65
.27
3.6
3.9
4.1
0.1
10
0.0
00
.14
%2
00
7F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
72
87
1.7
23
.44
.04
.20
.11
10
.10
0.0
0%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
49
4.1
23
.94
.14
.20
.06
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
056
99
.13
3.6
4.0
4.3
0.0
90
0.0
00
.17
%2
00
9F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite1
556
15
0.2
83
.34
.14
.30
.13
30
.25
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e4
18
40
.57
3.8
4.0
4.2
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite2
052
19
9.5
43
.74
.24
.40
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
11
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
95
17
.97
3.6
4.0
4.2
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
5F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
53
5.0
13
.84
.24
.40
.11
00
.00
0.1
5%
20
06
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
69
76
8.2
12
.14
.44
.60
.13
20
.10
0.0
0%
20
08
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
76
17
.53
4.1
4.3
4.5
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e7
80
75
.57
3.6
4.3
4.6
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
9F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
21
.17
3.8
4.2
4.3
0.1
80
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
10
19
.90
3.9
4.5
4.7
0.1
40
0.0
06
.05
%2
00
5F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
98
19
.49
3.0
4.0
4.3
0.2
41
21
.18
0.0
0%
20
05
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
86
47
.94
3.9
4.4
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
6F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
53
24
.88
3.8
4.2
4.5
0.1
30
0.0
00
.86
%2
00
6F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
96
19
4.3
13
.04
.24
.50
.17
90
.81
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
94
9.2
53
.74
.04
.30
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
33
12
.71
3.6
4.3
4.5
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
38
23
7.0
83
.74
.34
.50
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
37
93
6.3
13
.74
.34
.60
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
36
13
.53
3.7
4.2
4.4
0.1
30
0.0
00
.17
%2
01
0F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
284
12
6.0
03
.14
.34
.60
.15
30
.21
23
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
7:
Dis
tric
t 1
Sta
tis
tica
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m,
Ye
ar,
an
d A
gg
reg
ate
, c
on
tin
ue
d
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
00
.94
4.0
4.3
4.5
0.1
60
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite3
75
36
.39
3.6
4.4
4.6
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
90
8.8
54
.04
.44
.50
.11
00
.00
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
24
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
8:
Dis
tric
t 1
Sta
tis
tica
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
an
d M
ate
ria
l T
ran
sfe
r D
evic
e S
tatu
s
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
0.0
0%
11
561
13.
33
3.6
4.1
4.4
0.1
20
0.0
0F
C5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.24
%9
21
90
.64
3.5
4.1
4.3
0.1
33
0.2
2F
C5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.2
8%
37
43
5.9
23
.24
.04
.50
.17
10
.10
FC
5L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.0
9%
28
672
77.
18
3.3
4.2
4.4
0.1
13
0.2
5F
C5
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
teF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%2
70
26
.43
3.7
4.0
4.2
0.1
00
0.0
0F
C5
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
teN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
61
35
8.5
43
.64
.04
.20
.10
00
.00
FC
5L
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
teN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
10
19
.90
3.9
4.5
4.7
0.1
40
0.0
0F
C9.
5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d0
.00
%1
21
.17
3.8
4.2
4.3
0.1
80
0.0
0F
C9.
5L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
74
17
2.4
53
.74
.34
.60
.15
00
.00
FC
12
.5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.1
9%
11
291
09.
94
3.1
4.3
4.6
0.1
33
0.2
1F
C1
2.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
23
62
3.3
13
.74
.34
.50
.16
00
.00
FC
12
.5L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
59
215
76.
92
3.3
4.2
4.6
0.1
56
0.4
70
.08
%A
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
eF
ully
Use
d2
499
24
1.8
93
.14
.14
.70
.20
40
.31
0.1
3%
All
All
Gra
nite
& L
ime
sto
ne
Not
Use
d
25
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
9:
Dis
tric
t 1
Sta
tis
tica
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
an
d P
avi
ng
Tim
e
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
0.4
1%
50
04
8.7
83
.44
.14
.30
.12
20
.20
FC
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%1
18
11
.57
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
20
0.0
0F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.36
%1
54
71
51
.97
2.4
4.0
4.3
0.1
58
0.5
5F
C5
Da
yL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y1
.35
%1
05
01
02
.20
3.0
3.9
4.5
0.1
61
51
.38
FC
5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y0
.07
%3
74
83
61
.98
3.3
4.2
4.4
0.1
23
0.2
5F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
te0
.05
%1
96
41
90
.10
3.4
4.0
4.2
0.0
91
0.1
0F
C5
Da
yL
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
te0
.00
%3
49
32
.83
3.6
4.0
4.2
0.1
10
0.0
0F
C5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eIn
ters
tate
0.0
0%
10
19
.90
3.9
4.5
4.7
0.1
40
0.0
0F
C9.
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.07
%1
39
71
36
.02
2.1
4.3
4.6
0.1
32
0.1
0F
C9.
5D
ay
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
0.1
1%
18
20
17
8.2
23
.44
.34
.60
.16
20
.20
FC
12
.5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.04
%2
74
26
.65
3.1
4.4
4.6
0.1
61
0.0
1F
C1
2.5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.68
%1
20
21
18
.24
3.0
4.2
4.5
0.1
68
0.8
0F
C1
2.5
Da
yL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y0
.17
%9
18
.40
3.5
4.3
4.5
0.1
71
0.0
1F
C1
2.5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
85
31
83
3.2
12
.14
.24
.70
.20
23
1.9
50
.23
%D
ay
All
All
Gra
nite
& L
ime
sto
ne
56
30
54
3.6
33
.04
.14
.60
.17
20
1.6
50
.30
%N
igh
tA
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
e
26
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 10: District 1 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
43.09%2005 5 39.25 16.91 0.56%0.22FC5 Primary61.17%2006 7 81.95 50.13 0.57%0.46FC5 Primary62.39%2007 10 132.05 82.38 0.84%1.11FC5 Primary59.51%2008 5 41.45 24.67 1.36%0.57FC5 Primary81.47%2009 12 136.89 111.52 0.15%0.20FC5 Primary81.13%2010 4 42.98 34.87 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary90.07%2011 7 75.53 68.03 0.15%0.12FC5 Primary89.73%2005 1 58.43 52.42 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate71.95%2006 2 13.31 9.58 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate62.66%2007 2 71.72 44.94 0.14%0.10FC5 Interstate73.64%2008 3 103.25 76.03 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate84.77%2009 8 190.85 161.79 0.13%0.25FC5 Interstate99.60%2010 2 199.54 198.75 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate61.64%2011 2 17.97 11.08 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate99.07%2005 2 15.82 15.68 0.11%0.02FC9.5 Primary99.56%2006 5 68.21 67.91 0.15%0.10FC9.5 Primary99.69%2008 4 93.09 92.81 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary84.23%2009 1 1.17 0.98 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary98.99%2011 1 9.90 9.80 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary93.42%2005 5 67.43 62.99 1.75%1.18FC12.5 Primary93.89%2006 14 119.19 111.90 0.68%0.81FC12.5 Primary83.13%2007 4 21.96 18.26 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary97.95%2008 5 37.08 36.32 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary97.41%2009 8 54.22 52.81 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary98.59%2010 9 126.94 125.16 0.17%0.21FC12.5 Primary99.30%2011 6 45.23 44.92 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary
81.80%13 180.92 148.00 0.78%1.422005AllAll84.74%28 282.66 239.52 0.49%1.382006AllAll64.49%16 225.74 145.58 0.54%1.212007AllAll83.61%17 274.88 229.83 0.21%0.572008AllAll85.38%29 383.12 327.10 0.12%0.452009AllAll97.11%15 369.46 358.77 0.06%0.212010AllAll90.04%15 148.63 133.83 0.08%0.122011AllAll
27
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
11
: D
istr
ict
1 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y C
on
tra
cto
r, F
rict
ion
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
63
46
2.2
33
.74
.24
.30
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
Fu
lly U
sed
27
02
6.4
33
.74
.04
.20
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d4
73
45
.14
3.6
4.0
4.2
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d1
76
16
.92
4.0
4.3
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
A.P
.A.C
.F
ully
Use
d3
30
31
.53
3.1
4.2
4.4
0.1
01
0.0
10
.03
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
A.P
.A.C
.N
ot U
sed
31
17
30
1.4
73
.34
.24
.40
.12
30
.25
0.0
8%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
jax
Pa
vin
g In
du
stry
Fu
lly U
sed
62
66
1.5
63
.54
.14
.30
.11
20
.12
0.1
9%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Aja
x P
avi
ng
Ind
ust
ryF
ully
Use
d1
01
9.9
03
.94
.54
.70
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
Aja
x P
avi
ng
Ind
ust
ryN
ot U
sed
48
54
7.5
73
.74
.44
.60
.15
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
jax
Pa
vin
g In
du
stry
Fu
lly U
sed
73
7.2
34
.24
.54
.60
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
jax
Pa
vin
g In
du
stry
No
t Use
d1
32
13
.10
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5B
ett
er
Ro
ad
s In
c.F
ully
Use
d3
50
33
.65
3.6
4.0
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5B
ett
er
Ro
ad
s In
c.N
ot U
sed
12
1.1
73
.84
.24
.30
.18
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C9
.5B
ett
er
Ro
ad
s In
c.N
ot U
sed
16
1.5
74
.04
.34
.50
.16
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C1
2.5
Be
tte
r R
oa
ds
Inc.
Fu
lly U
sed
67
6.3
93
.74
.14
.30
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
C. W
. R
ob
ert
s C
on
tra
ctin
gF
ully
Use
d7
47
.28
4.2
4.4
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
12
.5C
. W.
Ro
be
rts
Co
ntr
act
ing
Fu
lly U
sed
13
61
3.5
33
.74
.24
.40
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C1
2.5
Co
mm
un
ity A
sph
alt
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
10
0.9
44
.04
.34
.50
.16
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C1
2.5
Dic
kers
on
Asp
ha
ltF
ully
Use
d9
69
.59
3.5
3.9
4.2
0.1
51
0.1
01
.04
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
80
7.9
73
.84
.14
.50
.15
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
14
1.2
33
.64
.14
.40
.19
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
No
t Use
d1
15
11
.04
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Mid
dle
sex
Co
rp.
No
t Use
d1
55
15
.48
3.6
4.0
4.3
0.1
50
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Orl
an
do
Pav
ing
Co
mp
an
yF
ully
Use
d1
17
11
.33
4.0
4.2
4.4
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
76
7.0
23
.23
.94
.50
.25
10
.10
1.4
2%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
S.
T.
Woo
ten
Cor
p.N
ot U
sed
59
75
8.9
03
.44
.34
.50
.12
20
.20
0.3
4%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5S
up
eri
or
Asp
ha
lt In
c.N
ot U
sed
88
8.6
63
.64
.04
.20
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
We
ekl
ey A
spha
lt P
avi
ng
No
t Use
dA
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.M
ate
ria
l Tra
nsf
er
De
vice
Sta
tuse
s o
f "P
art
ially
Use
d" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n" h
ave
be
en
exc
lud
ed f
rom
th
is r
ep
ort
.
28
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 5: District 2 Ride Distribution, All Lots
District 2
1988.78 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
20279 1988.78 1.8 4.2 4.6 0.17 50 4.28All Lots 0.22%
29
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 6: District 2 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 631.49 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 508.88 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 80.65 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 767.76 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
6428 631.49 1.8 4.1 4.5 0.16 33 2.86FC5 Primary 0.45%5232 508.88 3.2 4.1 4.4 0.16 6 0.51FC5 Interstate 0.10%827 80.65 3.2 4.4 4.6 0.13 1 0.01FC9.5 Primary 0.01%7792 767.76 2.9 4.3 4.6 0.14 10 0.90FC12.5 Primary 0.12%
30
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
12
: D
istr
ict
2 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te
0.2
1%
20
05
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
53
65
2.9
53
.34
.14
.30
.13
20
.11
3.3
3%
20
05
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e7
26
.13
3.3
4.0
4.2
0.1
84
0.2
00
.45
%2
00
6F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite4
45
44
.07
3.4
4.1
4.3
0.1
62
0.2
07
.29
%2
00
6F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
27
62
7.2
61
.83
.94
.20
.30
21
1.9
90
.06
%2
00
7F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
563
15
4.5
63
.54
.14
.30
.10
10
.10
0.0
9%
20
08
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
57
75
5.9
43
.54
.04
.20
.11
10
.05
0.2
4%
20
09
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
84
78
3.4
83
.34
.14
.40
.14
20
.20
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
14
561
42.
33
3.6
4.3
4.5
0.1
30
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite6
56
64
.79
3.7
4.2
4.4
0.1
00
0.0
00
.21
%2
00
5F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite4
92
47
.04
3.5
4.0
4.4
0.1
71
0.1
00
.00
%2
00
6F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite4
20
41
.53
3.9
4.2
4.4
0.0
80
0.0
00
.11
%2
00
7F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite2
033
19
8.0
83
.24
.14
.40
.16
30
.22
0.1
9%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
10
391
01.
55
3.2
4.2
4.4
0.1
52
0.1
90
.00
%2
00
9F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite2
96
29
.00
3.7
4.2
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite3
89
36
.79
4.0
4.2
4.4
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite5
63
54
.89
3.6
4.1
4.4
0.1
30
0.0
00
.03
%2
00
5F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
39
73
8.8
53
.24
.34
.60
.14
10
.01
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
24
22
.04
4.0
4.3
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
16
51
5.9
24
.24
.54
.60
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite4
13
.83
4.2
4.5
4.6
0.1
00
0.0
00
.07
%2
00
5F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
96
19
.48
3.5
4.2
4.5
0.1
31
0.0
10
.30
%2
00
6F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
356
13
3.3
33
.04
.34
.60
.14
40
.40
0.0
9%
20
07
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
11
151
09.
76
3.3
4.2
4.5
0.1
21
0.1
00
.06
%2
00
8F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
687
16
6.4
33
.14
.34
.60
.13
10
.10
0.2
0%
20
09
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
99
29
8.1
02
.94
.34
.60
.16
20
.20
0.0
8%
20
10
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
11
991
17.
76
3.1
4.3
4.5
0.1
31
0.0
90
.00
%2
01
1F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
135
11
1.8
13
.64
.34
.50
.14
00
.00
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
31
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
13
: D
istr
ict
2 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, Sys
tem
, Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
0.0
9%
21
772
14.
21
3.3
4.2
4.5
0.1
52
0.2
0F
C5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%2
16
20
.91
3.9
4.2
4.4
0.1
00
0.0
0F
C5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
60
55
7.9
14
.04
.24
.40
.08
00
.00
FC
5G
ran
iteIn
ters
tate
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
0%
41
3.8
34
.24
.54
.60
.10
00
.00
FC
9.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
10
631
04.
64
3.6
4.3
4.5
0.1
20
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.08
%1
240
12
2.4
73
.14
.34
.60
.15
10
.10
FC
12
.5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
38
453
76.
76
3.3
4.2
4.5
0.1
42
0.2
00
.05
%A
llA
llG
ran
iteF
ully
Use
d1
497
14
7.2
13
.14
.34
.60
.15
10
.10
0.0
7%
All
All
Gra
nite
Not
Use
d
32
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
14
: D
istr
ict
2 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, A
gg
reg
ate
, an
d P
avin
g T
ime
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
0.1
0%
41
42
40
7.6
93
.34
.14
.50
.15
40
.40
FC
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.28
%2
05
18
.82
3.5
4.0
4.2
0.1
31
0.0
5F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y7
.29
%2
76
27
.26
1.8
3.9
4.2
0.3
02
11
.99
FC
5D
ay
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
42
04
1.5
33
.94
.24
.40
.08
00
.00
FC
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
te0
.12
%9
98
93
.93
3.5
4.2
4.4
0.1
22
0.1
2F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
te0
.00
%2
24
22
.04
4.0
4.3
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
0F
C9.
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%2
06
19
.75
4.2
4.5
4.6
0.0
80
0.0
0F
C9.
5N
igh
tG
ran
iteP
rim
ary
0.0
9%
65
93
65
0.4
13
.04
.34
.60
.13
60
.60
FC
12
.5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y1
.36
%1
57
14
.70
2.9
4.1
4.4
0.2
02
0.2
0F
C1
2.5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
11
65
51
148
.92
1.8
4.2
4.6
0.1
73
12
.99
0.2
6%
Da
yA
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
e1
56
61
47
.20
2.9
4.2
4.6
0.1
85
0.3
70
.25
%N
igh
tA
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
e
33
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 15: District 2 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
86.96%2005 4 59.08 51.38 0.54%0.32FC5 Primary72.69%2006 3 71.32 51.85 3.07%2.19FC5 Primary94.12%2007 5 154.56 145.46 0.06%0.10FC5 Primary77.33%2008 3 55.94 43.26 0.09%0.05FC5 Primary84.37%2009 3 83.48 70.43 0.24%0.20FC5 Primary97.77%2010 4 142.33 139.16 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary98.55%2011 6 64.79 63.85 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary72.17%2005 3 47.04 33.95 0.21%0.10FC5 Interstate99.52%2006 1 41.53 41.33 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate73.59%2007 6 198.08 145.76 0.11%0.22FC5 Interstate90.09%2008 4 101.55 91.49 0.19%0.19FC5 Interstate96.42%2009 3 29.00 27.96 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate
100.00%2010 3 36.79 36.79 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate90.96%2011 1 54.89 49.93 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate98.17%2005 2 38.85 38.14 0.03%0.01FC9.5 Primary
100.00%2007 2 22.04 22.04 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary100.00%2008 1 15.92 15.92 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary100.00%2010 1 3.83 3.83 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary95.82%2005 1 19.48 18.66 0.07%0.01FC12.5 Primary98.20%2006 15 133.33 130.93 0.30%0.40FC12.5 Primary97.04%2007 12 120.86 117.29 0.08%0.10FC12.5 Primary99.26%2008 13 166.43 165.20 0.06%0.10FC12.5 Primary97.32%2009 9 98.10 95.47 0.20%0.20FC12.5 Primary98.97%2010 10 117.76 116.55 0.08%0.09FC12.5 Primary97.10%2011 9 111.81 108.57 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary
86.43%10 164.46 142.13 0.27%0.442005AllAll91.03%19 246.18 224.10 1.05%2.592006AllAll86.89%25 495.54 430.55 0.08%0.422007AllAll92.94%20 339.84 315.87 0.10%0.342008AllAll92.06%15 210.58 193.85 0.19%0.402009AllAll98.54%18 300.70 296.32 0.03%0.092010AllAll96.05%16 231.49 222.34 0.00%0.002011AllAll
34
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
16
: D
istr
ict
2 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y C
on
tra
cto
r, F
rict
ion
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
59
45
8.6
84
.04
.24
.40
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
Fu
lly U
sed
60
5.7
34
.14
.34
.40
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d4
13
.83
4.2
4.5
4.6
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d9
08
.79
4.1
4.4
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
A.P
.A.C
.F
ully
Use
d3
80
37
.71
4.0
4.3
4.6
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
A.P
.A.C
.N
ot U
sed
14
32
14
2.0
23
.34
.24
.50
.18
20
.20
0.1
4%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
nd
erso
n C
olu
mb
iaF
ully
Use
d6
05
.80
3.9
4.2
4.3
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
No
t Use
d7
49
73
.93
3.6
4.3
4.5
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
Fu
lly U
sed
59
35
8.8
43
.84
.34
.60
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
nd
erso
n C
olu
mb
iaN
ot U
sed
48
24
5.7
13
.84
.24
.40
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
tlan
tic C
oa
stF
ully
Use
d4
24
.09
4.1
4.3
4.4
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Atla
ntic
Co
ast
Fu
lly U
sed
96
9.3
83
.94
.14
.30
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsN
ot U
sed
27
42
5.7
13
.64
.14
.30
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5D
uva
l Asp
ha
ltF
ully
Use
d8
28
.02
3.9
4.3
4.4
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Duv
al A
sph
alt
Fu
lly U
sed
50
4.7
73
.14
.04
.20
.19
10
.10
2.1
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5D
uva
l Asp
ha
ltN
ot U
sed
20
1.4
73
.74
.14
.30
.17
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5P
& S
Pav
ing
No
t Use
d1
00
9.8
14
.04
.24
.40
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5P
ea
vy a
nd
So
ns
Fu
lly U
sed
19
71
9.6
73
.84
.24
.40
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5W
hite
hur
stN
ot U
sed
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
35
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
36
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 7: District 3 Ride Distribution, All Lots
District 3
1060.14 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
10793 1060.14 2.4 4.3 4.6 0.15 5 0.39All Lots 0.04%
37
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 8: District 3 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 293.41 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 283.05 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 327.47 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 156.21 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
2980 293.41 2.4 4.2 4.6 0.12 4 0.29FC5 Primary 0.10%2904 283.05 3.5 4.2 4.4 0.10 1 0.10FC5 Interstate 0.04%3315 327.47 3.6 4.4 4.6 0.11 0 0.00FC9.5 Primary 0.00%1594 156.21 3.6 4.3 4.6 0.13 0 0.00FC12.5 Primary 0.00%
38
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
17
: D
istr
ict
3 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te
0.2
5%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
11
701
15.
87
2.4
4.2
4.4
0.1
14
0.2
90
.00
%2
00
8F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
66
26
.30
3.7
4.1
4.3
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
9F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite7
35
71
.86
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite6
08
59
.40
3.9
4.3
4.5
0.1
30
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
01
19
.98
3.7
4.4
4.6
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
6F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite3
41
32
.78
3.6
4.1
4.3
0.0
90
0.0
00
.28
%2
00
7F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite3
71
36
.22
3.5
4.2
4.3
0.0
81
0.1
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite1
115
10
8.5
93
.64
.24
.40
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
77
57
5.4
33
.94
.24
.30
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
30
23
0.0
34
.14
.34
.40
.06
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite4
96
48
.70
3.9
4.4
4.6
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
49
84
9.0
84
.14
.54
.60
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite7
48
74
.25
4.0
4.4
4.6
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
71
07
0.3
93
.64
.44
.60
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
11
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite8
63
85
.06
3.6
4.4
4.6
0.1
30
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
5F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite7
87
.68
3.9
4.2
4.4
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
7F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
97
19
.24
3.7
4.2
4.5
0.1
60
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
24
22
.20
3.9
4.3
4.5
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
9F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
84
18
.16
4.0
4.3
4.6
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite6
71
65
.73
3.6
4.3
4.6
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
40
23
.22
3.9
4.4
4.6
0.1
10
0.0
0A
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.
39
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
18
: D
istr
ict
3 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, Sys
tem
, Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
0.0
0%
15
441
51.
24
3.7
4.3
4.6
0.1
10
0.0
0F
C5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%1
077
10
5.4
63
.94
.24
.40
.10
00
.00
FC
5G
ran
iteIn
ters
tate
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
0%
21
452
12.
19
3.6
4.4
4.6
0.1
20
0.0
0F
C9.
5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
0%
12
81
2.8
04
.14
.44
.50
.07
00
.00
FC
9.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
10
951
07.
10
3.6
4.3
4.6
0.1
20
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
58
615
75.
99
3.6
4.3
4.6
0.1
40
0.0
00
.00
%A
llA
llG
ran
iteF
ully
Use
d1
28
12
.80
4.1
4.4
4.5
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%A
llA
llG
ran
iteN
ot U
sed
40
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
19
: D
istr
ict
3 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, A
gg
reg
ate
, an
d P
avin
g T
ime
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
0.0
0%
22
94
22
5.6
73
.74
.24
.60
.11
00
.00
FC
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%1
26
12
.43
3.7
4.1
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
0F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.05
%2
13
62
09
.84
3.5
4.2
4.4
0.1
11
0.1
0F
C5
Da
yG
ran
iteIn
ters
tate
0.0
0%
42
94
1.2
43
.94
.24
.40
.09
00
.00
FC
5N
igh
tG
ran
iteIn
ters
tate
0.0
0%
24
73
24
4.0
23
.64
.44
.60
.11
00
.00
FC
9.5
Da
yG
ran
iteP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
80
7.9
94
.14
.54
.60
.08
00
.00
FC
9.5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%1
23
21
20
.49
3.6
4.3
4.6
0.1
30
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Da
yG
ran
iteP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
92
8.9
74
.14
.44
.50
.08
00
.00
FC
12
.5N
igh
tG
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
81
35
80
0.0
23
.54
.34
.60
.15
10
.10
0.0
1%
Da
yA
llA
llG
ran
ite7
27
70
.63
3.7
4.2
4.6
0.1
50
0.0
00
.00
%N
igh
tA
llA
llG
ran
ite
41
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 20: District 3 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
97.75%2007 4 115.87 113.26 0.25%0.29FC5 Primary97.34%2008 2 26.30 25.60 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary99.56%2009 5 71.86 71.54 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary99.49%2010 3 59.40 59.10 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary99.38%2011 2 19.98 19.86 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary97.67%2006 1 32.78 32.01 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate99.17%2007 1 36.22 35.92 0.28%0.10FC5 Interstate97.08%2008 5 108.59 105.43 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate98.72%2009 3 75.43 74.46 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate
100.00%2010 1 30.03 30.03 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate99.92%2007 3 48.70 48.65 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary
100.00%2008 5 49.08 49.08 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary100.00%2009 3 74.25 74.25 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary99.29%2010 4 70.39 69.89 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary99.65%2011 6 85.06 84.76 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary98.70%2005 2 7.68 7.58 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary94.56%2007 2 19.24 18.19 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary99.55%2008 2 22.20 22.10 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary
100.00%2009 2 18.16 18.16 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary99.14%2010 5 65.73 65.17 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary99.14%2011 2 23.22 23.02 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary
98.70%2 7.68 7.58 0.00%0.002005AllAll97.67%1 32.78 32.01 0.00%0.002006AllAll98.18%10 220.03 216.03 0.18%0.392007AllAll98.08%14 206.16 202.20 0.00%0.002008AllAll99.46%12 239.69 238.40 0.00%0.002009AllAll99.40%13 225.55 224.18 0.00%0.002010AllAll99.51%9 128.27 127.64 0.00%0.002011AllAll
42
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
21
: D
istr
ict
3 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y C
on
tra
cto
r, F
rict
ion
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
30
23
0.0
34
.14
.34
.40
.06
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
Fu
lly U
sed
12
41
2.2
74
.14
.44
.60
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
A.P
.A.C
.F
ully
Use
d6
05
.85
4.1
4.4
4.5
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
A.P
.A.C
.F
ully
Use
d5
22
50
.62
4.0
4.2
4.4
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
Fu
lly U
sed
33
23
2.4
83
.64
.44
.60
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
Fu
lly U
sed
60
35
9.0
53
.64
.34
.50
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5A
nd
erso
n C
olu
mb
iaF
ully
Use
d8
11
80
.29
3.7
4.2
4.6
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
C. W
. R
ob
ert
s C
on
tra
ctin
gF
ully
Use
d8
47
84
.08
3.9
4.4
4.6
0.1
30
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5C
. W.
Ro
be
rts
Co
ntr
act
ing
Fu
lly U
sed
43
24
2.2
13
.94
.44
.60
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5C
. W.
Ro
be
rts
Co
ntr
act
ing
Fu
lly U
sed
26
02
5.6
14
.14
.34
.50
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5G
AC
Co
ntra
cto
rsF
ully
Use
d1
28
12
.80
4.1
4.4
4.5
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5Jo
ne
s C
ons
tru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
45
24
4.8
63
.64
.44
.60
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
Pa
nh
an
dle
Gra
din
g &
Pa
vin
gF
ully
Use
d7
26
70
.15
3.8
4.2
4.5
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Pe
avy
an
d S
on
sF
ully
Use
d3
90
38
.50
4.0
4.4
4.6
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5P
ea
vy a
nd
So
ns
Fu
lly U
sed
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
43
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
44
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 9: District 4 Ride Distribution, All Lots
District 4
1382.24 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
14340 1382.24 2.1 4.0 4.7 0.22 444 40.62All Lots 2.94%
45
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 10: District 4 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 387.54 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 855.02 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 107.22 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 32.46 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
3946 387.54 2.7 4.0 4.4 0.20 143 13.14FC5 Primary 3.39%8976 855.02 2.1 3.9 4.4 0.19 300 27.38FC5 Interstate 3.20%1092 107.22 3.4 4.4 4.7 0.12 1 0.10FC9.5 Primary 0.09%326 32.46 3.6 4.3 4.5 0.20 0 0.00FC12.5 Primary 0.00%
46
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
22
: D
istr
ict
4 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te
4.4
7%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
252
12
3.3
63
.03
.94
.20
.17
60
5.5
20
.65
%2
00
8F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
48
54
6.6
42
.84
.04
.30
.13
70
.30
6.0
0%
20
09
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e9
98
98
.92
3.1
3.9
4.4
0.2
16
05
.93
0.0
2%
20
10
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e8
57
83
.92
3.4
4.1
4.4
0.1
11
0.0
23
.95
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
35
43
4.7
02
.74
.04
.20
.20
15
1.3
74
.63
%2
00
5F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
80
67
4.3
72
.83
.84
.20
.15
37
3.4
56
.54
%2
00
6F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
13
641
33.
23
3.1
3.8
4.2
0.1
79
08
.71
9.7
9%
20
07
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e9
93
93
.05
3.2
3.8
4.2
0.1
79
99
.11
2.4
7%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
886
18
0.1
82
.94
.04
.40
.19
52
4.4
50
.87
%2
00
9F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
13
511
29.
05
2.1
4.0
4.2
0.1
51
21
.12
0.1
5%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
616
15
5.9
92
.24
.04
.30
.13
30
.24
0.3
4%
20
11
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e9
60
89
.15
3.3
4.0
4.3
0.1
47
0.3
10
.74
%2
00
8F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
38
13
.49
3.4
4.3
4.5
0.1
31
0.1
00
.00
%2
00
9F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
52
44
.46
3.9
4.3
4.5
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e5
02
49
.27
3.9
4.4
4.7
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
7F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
11
41
1.3
23
.84
.24
.50
.16
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e3
23
.16
3.6
3.8
4.1
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
18
01
7.9
84
.14
.44
.50
.09
00
.00
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
47
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
23
: D
istr
ict
4 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, Sys
tem
, Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
3.5
7%
16
881
66.
84
3.1
4.0
4.4
0.2
16
15
.95
FC
5L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%1
67
16
.00
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.1
10
0.0
0F
C5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d0
.09
%9
08
87
.31
3.3
4.1
4.2
0.1
13
0.0
8F
C5
Lim
est
on
eIn
ters
tate
Fu
lly U
sed
0.7
7%
85
68
2.3
82
.24
.04
.30
.16
70
.64
FC
5L
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
teN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
40
43
9.7
83
.94
.54
.70
.10
00
.00
FC
9.5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
0%
68
6.5
14
.04
.44
.60
.10
00
.00
FC
9.5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d0
.00
%3
23
.16
3.6
3.8
4.1
0.1
20
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
30
002
93.
92
3.1
4.1
4.7
0.2
46
46
.02
2.0
5%
All
All
Lim
est
on
eF
ully
Use
d1
123
10
8.0
52
.24
.04
.60
.19
70
.64
0.5
9%
All
All
Lim
est
on
eN
ot U
sed
48
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
24
: D
istr
ict
4 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, A
gg
reg
ate
, an
d P
avin
g T
ime
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
4.0
1%
26
78
26
3.8
12
.74
.04
.40
.21
11
01
0.5
7F
C5
Da
yL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y0
.42
%7
40
71
.48
2.8
4.0
4.4
0.1
57
0.3
0F
C5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
0.8
3%
14
72
14
2.1
82
.24
.04
.30
.14
14
1.1
8F
C5
Da
yL
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
te3
.57
%6
47
26
16
.48
2.1
3.9
4.4
0.1
92
37
21
.98
FC
5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
te0
.09
%1
07
61
05
.79
3.4
4.4
4.7
0.1
31
0.1
0F
C9.
5D
ay
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
16
1.4
34
.24
.44
.40
.06
00
.00
FC
9.5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
21
22
1.1
43
.64
.34
.50
.21
00
.00
FC
12
.5D
ay
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
54
38
53
2.9
22
.24
.14
.70
.25
12
51
1.8
52
.22
%D
ay
All
All
Lim
est
on
e7
22
86
89
.39
2.1
3.9
4.4
0.1
92
44
22
.29
3.2
3%
Nig
ht
All
All
Lim
est
on
e
49
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 25: District 4 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
43.27%2007 7 123.36 53.38 4.47%5.52FC5 Primary75.06%2008 3 46.64 35.00 0.65%0.30FC5 Primary36.21%2009 3 98.92 35.82 6.00%5.93FC5 Primary92.70%2010 4 83.92 77.79 0.02%0.02FC5 Primary68.48%2011 1 34.70 23.77 3.95%1.37FC5 Primary20.42%2005 3 74.37 15.18 4.63%3.45FC5 Interstate20.60%2006 4 133.23 27.44 6.54%8.71FC5 Interstate17.42%2007 4 93.05 16.21 9.79%9.11FC5 Interstate60.41%2008 5 180.18 108.84 2.47%4.45FC5 Interstate74.34%2009 3 129.05 95.95 0.87%1.12FC5 Interstate76.05%2010 3 155.99 118.62 0.15%0.24FC5 Interstate77.39%2011 4 89.15 68.99 0.34%0.31FC5 Interstate98.52%2008 1 13.49 13.29 0.74%0.10FC9.5 Primary99.19%2009 3 44.46 44.10 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary99.88%2010 3 49.27 49.21 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary90.28%2007 1 11.32 10.22 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary24.70%2010 1 3.16 0.78 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary
100.00%2011 1 17.98 17.98 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary
20.42%3 74.37 15.18 4.63%3.452005AllAll20.60%4 133.23 27.44 6.54%8.712006AllAll35.05%12 227.73 79.81 6.42%14.632007AllAll65.39%9 240.31 157.14 2.02%4.852008AllAll64.55%9 272.44 175.87 2.59%7.052009AllAll84.29%11 292.34 246.40 0.09%0.252010AllAll78.08%6 141.83 110.74 1.18%1.682011AllAll
50
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
26
: D
istr
ict
4 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y C
on
tra
cto
r, F
rict
ion
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
64
66
2.2
12
.24
.04
.30
.13
20
.14
0.2
2%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Asp
ha
lt G
rou
p,
Inc.
No
t Use
d8
94
88
.61
3.1
3.8
4.2
0.1
96
05
.93
6.6
9%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Co
mm
un
ity A
sph
alt
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
84
7.8
13
.84
.14
.30
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Co
mm
un
ity A
sph
alt
Co
rp.
No
t Use
d1
08
61
05
.64
3.7
4.1
4.4
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5D
icke
rso
n A
sph
alt
Fu
lly U
sed
14
61
4.2
03
.94
.44
.50
.08
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C9
.5D
icke
rso
n A
sph
alt
Fu
lly U
sed
32
3.1
63
.63
.84
.10
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C1
2.5
Ha
rdri
ves
of
De
lra
yN
ot U
sed
11
41
0.2
73
.33
.94
.10
.13
30
.08
0.7
4%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
J. W
. C
he
ath
am
, L
LC
.F
ully
Use
d1
61
.43
4.2
4.4
4.4
0.0
60
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
9.5
J. W
. C
he
ath
am
, L
LC
.N
ot U
sed
50
24
9.6
33
.44
.14
.30
.11
10
.02
0.0
3%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
13
31
2.9
03
.44
.04
.40
.24
40
.40
3.1
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
No
t Use
d2
58
25
.57
4.1
4.5
4.7
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
9.5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Fu
lly U
sed
52
5.0
84
.04
.44
.60
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C9
.5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
16
01
5.4
63
.43
.84
.10
.12
10
.10
0.6
5%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
We
ekl
ey A
spha
lt P
avi
ng
No
t Use
dA
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.M
ate
ria
l Tra
nsf
er
De
vice
Sta
tuse
s o
f "P
art
ially
Use
d" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n" h
ave
be
en
exc
lud
ed f
rom
th
is r
ep
ort
.
51
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
52
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 11: District 5 Ride Distribution, All Lots
District 5
1917.40 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
19568 1917.40 1.2 4.1 4.6 0.18 86 7.71All Lots 0.40%
53
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 12: District 5 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 715.43 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.52.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Toll ‐ 22.47 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.52.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 779.35 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 167.11 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 233.04 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
7326 715.43 1.2 4.1 4.5 0.15 41 3.73FC5 Primary 0.52%243 22.47 3.3 4.1 4.3 0.12 1 0.02FC5 Toll 0.07%7918 779.35 2.8 4.1 4.4 0.16 33 3.12FC5 Interstate 0.40%1696 167.11 3.2 4.3 4.6 0.16 4 0.34FC9.5 Primary 0.20%2385 233.04 3.2 4.3 4.6 0.15 7 0.51FC12.5 Primary 0.22%
54
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
27
: D
istr
ict
5 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te
0.7
8%
20
05
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
64
86
4.1
63
.34
.14
.30
.12
50
.50
1.7
3%
20
05
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
47
42
.13
3.3
4.0
4.3
0.1
48
0.7
30
.38
%2
00
6F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite7
18
70
.31
3.3
4.0
4.3
0.1
43
0.2
71
.28
%2
00
6F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
63
16
2.0
41
.24
.04
.30
.14
90
.79
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
78
57
7.2
23
.74
.14
.30
.10
00
.00
3.8
9%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e2
34
23
.13
3.4
3.9
4.2
0.1
69
0.9
00
.11
%2
00
8F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
139
11
2.1
53
.44
.14
.30
.12
20
.13
0.0
0%
20
08
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
97
49
.20
3.6
4.0
4.2
0.0
90
0.0
00
.13
%2
00
9F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite9
81
94
.59
3.5
4.1
4.3
0.1
22
0.1
20
.87
%2
00
9F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
23
82
3.0
93
.54
.14
.30
.14
20
.20
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
36
23
4.1
23
.74
.24
.50
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e4
44
.40
3.7
4.1
4.3
0.1
10
0.0
00
.17
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite6
02
58
.92
3.5
4.2
4.4
0.1
11
0.1
00
.00
%2
00
6F
C5
To
llG
ran
ite2
07
19
.47
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
00
.53
%2
00
6F
C5
To
llL
ime
sto
ne
36
3.0
03
.33
.94
.10
.11
10
.02
0.0
0%
20
05
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e8
04
79
.62
3.6
4.2
4.4
0.0
90
0.0
01
.20
%2
00
6F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite1
306
12
8.4
92
.83
.94
.30
.14
16
1.5
40
.69
%2
00
7F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite1
691
16
7.2
13
.14
.04
.30
.16
12
1.1
60
.07
%2
00
8F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite1
417
13
9.7
43
.54
.14
.40
.16
10
.10
0.0
0%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e2
48
24
.36
3.6
4.1
4.3
0.1
20
0.0
00
.51
%2
00
9F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite4
12
39
.44
3.5
4.1
4.3
0.1
22
0.2
00
.00
%2
00
9F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
24
82
4.4
03
.74
.14
.30
.10
00
.00
4.3
2%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
30
2.7
63
.44
.04
.20
.18
20
.12
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e2
48
23
.74
3.7
4.0
4.2
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite4
26
42
.02
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
10
881
07.
59
3.6
4.1
4.4
0.1
10
0.0
00
.66
%2
00
5F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
60
5.6
33
.24
.34
.50
.18
10
.04
1.0
2%
20
06
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
99
9.7
83
.44
.44
.60
.15
10
.10
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite2
60
25
.71
3.8
4.2
4.5
0.1
30
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
48
04
7.6
33
.94
.54
.60
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite4
58
44
.91
3.6
4.3
4.5
0.1
50
0.0
00
.09
%2
00
5F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
34
12
.87
3.4
4.0
4.4
0.1
11
0.0
10
.00
%2
00
6F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
80
7.6
53
.64
.24
.50
.18
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
43
54
2.4
13
.64
.24
.50
.14
00
.00
0.0
8%
20
08
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
48
04
7.2
53
.24
.34
.60
.11
10
.04
0.4
1%
20
09
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
23
62
3.0
73
.44
.34
.50
.12
10
.09
0.3
3%
20
10
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
50
34
9.2
23
.34
.34
.50
.14
20
.16
0.6
4%
20
11
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
31
63
1.1
33
.34
.34
.60
.15
20
.20
55
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
27
: D
istr
ict
5 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te,
co
nti
nu
ed
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
56
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
28
: D
istr
ict
5 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, Sys
tem
, Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
0.2
4%
42
54
1.3
53
.54
.24
.40
.12
10
.10
FC
5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
9%
13
651
31.
78
3.5
4.1
4.5
0.1
42
0.1
2F
C5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.8
7%
23
82
3.0
93
.54
.14
.30
.14
20
.20
FC
5L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%4
44
.40
3.7
4.1
4.3
0.1
10
0.0
0F
C5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d0
.00
%2
70
25
.93
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
0F
C5
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
teN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
13
361
31.
32
3.6
4.1
4.4
0.1
30
0.0
0F
C5
Lim
est
on
eIn
ters
tate
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
0%
63
6.1
63
.84
.34
.50
.16
00
.00
FC
9.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.00
%1
13
11
.07
4.0
4.4
4.5
0.1
10
0.0
0F
C9.
5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d0
.00
%3
19
31
.35
3.9
4.4
4.5
0.1
00
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d0
.77
%6
10
59
.54
3.3
4.3
4.6
0.1
55
0.4
6F
C1
2.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
23
812
33.
27
3.5
4.2
4.5
0.1
53
0.3
00
.13
%A
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
eF
ully
Use
d2
402
23
2.7
23
.34
.24
.60
.16
70
.58
0.2
5%
All
All
Gra
nite
& L
ime
sto
ne
Not
Use
d
57
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
29
: D
istr
ict
5 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, A
gg
reg
ate
, an
d P
avin
g T
ime
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
0.0
8%
24
06
23
5.8
13
.54
.14
.50
.12
20
.20
FC
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.22
%1
66
21
60
.73
3.4
4.1
4.4
0.1
45
0.3
5F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.86
%1
18
21
16
.77
3.3
4.0
4.3
0.1
21
01
.00
FC
5D
ay
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
0.0
0%
44
4.4
03
.74
.14
.30
.11
00
.00
FC
5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%2
07
19
.47
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
0F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
To
ll0
.53
%3
63
.00
3.3
3.9
4.1
0.1
11
0.0
2F
C5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eT
oll
0.1
2%
29
50
28
9.3
12
.94
.14
.40
.15
50
.36
FC
5N
igh
tG
ran
iteIn
ters
tate
0.0
0%
24
82
4.4
03
.74
.14
.30
.10
00
.00
FC
5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
te0
.00
%7
13
70
.45
3.8
4.4
4.6
0.1
60
0.0
0F
C9.
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%3
93
38
.94
3.6
4.3
4.6
0.1
50
0.0
0F
C9.
5N
igh
tG
ran
iteP
rim
ary
1.0
2%
99
9.7
83
.44
.44
.60
.15
10
.10
FC
9.5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
0.1
6%
12
96
12
7.7
73
.24
.34
.60
.12
30
.20
FC
12
.5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%4
02
38
.85
3.6
4.2
4.5
0.1
50
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%4
24
.02
3.6
4.2
4.5
0.2
00
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Da
yL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%3
83
.63
3.8
4.3
4.5
0.1
40
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
56
39
55
4.8
13
.24
.24
.60
.19
15
1.4
00
.25
%D
ay
All
All
Gra
nite
& L
ime
sto
ne
60
79
59
2.5
22
.94
.24
.60
.15
12
0.8
20
.14
%N
igh
tA
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
e
58
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 30: District 5 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
81.33%2005 6 106.29 86.44 1.16%1.23FC5 Primary68.28%2006 8 132.34 90.37 0.80%1.06FC5 Primary79.22%2007 5 100.34 79.49 0.90%0.90FC5 Primary88.51%2008 8 161.35 142.81 0.08%0.13FC5 Primary92.32%2009 9 117.67 108.63 0.27%0.32FC5 Primary95.69%2010 5 38.52 36.86 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary98.83%2011 6 58.92 58.23 0.17%0.10FC5 Primary85.48%2006 2 22.47 19.21 0.07%0.02FC5 Toll98.12%2005 1 79.62 78.12 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate42.81%2006 2 128.49 55.00 1.20%1.54FC5 Interstate75.96%2007 4 167.21 127.01 0.69%1.16FC5 Interstate87.02%2008 4 164.10 142.81 0.06%0.10FC5 Interstate92.37%2009 3 63.84 58.97 0.31%0.20FC5 Interstate68.80%2010 2 26.49 18.23 0.45%0.12FC5 Interstate95.12%2011 3 149.60 142.31 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate97.57%2005 3 25.85 25.22 0.92%0.24FC9.5 Primary99.57%2006 3 23.02 22.92 0.43%0.10FC9.5 Primary97.13%2007 1 25.71 24.97 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary99.58%2008 2 47.63 47.43 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary97.19%2009 4 44.91 43.64 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary74.37%2005 1 12.87 9.57 0.09%0.01FC12.5 Primary95.49%2006 4 17.73 16.93 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary95.72%2007 3 42.41 40.59 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary99.66%2008 4 56.62 56.42 0.07%0.04FC12.5 Primary99.15%2009 2 23.07 22.87 0.41%0.09FC12.5 Primary98.90%2010 5 49.22 48.68 0.33%0.16FC12.5 Primary96.86%2011 4 31.13 30.15 0.64%0.20FC12.5 Primary
88.75%11 224.62 199.36 0.66%1.482005AllAll63.08%18 324.05 204.42 0.84%2.722006AllAll81.05%12 335.67 272.07 0.61%2.062007AllAll90.64%18 429.69 389.47 0.06%0.272008AllAll93.84%17 249.49 234.12 0.25%0.612009AllAll90.84%12 114.23 103.76 0.25%0.282010AllAll96.26%13 239.66 230.69 0.13%0.302011AllAll
59
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
31
: D
istr
ict
5 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y C
on
tra
cto
r, F
rict
ion
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
52
5.1
73
.94
.14
.30
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d5
65
.25
3.3
4.3
4.6
0.2
22
0.2
03
.81
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
A.P
.A.C
.N
ot U
sed
74
6.9
73
.74
.14
.30
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
nd
erso
n C
olu
mb
iaF
ully
Use
d2
70
25
.93
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
00
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
An
der
son
Co
lum
bia
No
t Use
d6
36
.16
3.8
4.3
4.5
0.1
60
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5A
nd
erso
n C
olu
mb
iaF
ully
Use
d6
66
.60
3.9
4.3
4.5
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
C. W
. R
ob
ert
s C
on
tra
ctin
gF
ully
Use
d1
08
81
07
.59
3.6
4.1
4.4
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5C
om
mu
nity
Asp
hal
t C
orp
.F
ully
Use
d1
04
10
.07
4.0
4.3
4.4
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
D.A
.B.
Co
nst
ruct
ors
Fu
lly U
sed
57
5.6
73
.94
.14
.20
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsN
ot U
sed
20
1.8
64
.14
.44
.50
.10
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsN
ot U
sed
55
45
4.1
63
.74
.24
.50
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5H
alif
ax
Pa
vin
g I
nc.
No
t Use
d4
03
.81
3.9
4.2
4.3
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Hu
bb
ard
Con
stru
ctio
nF
ully
Use
d7
06
.10
3.7
4.1
4.3
0.1
60
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Hu
bb
ard
Con
stru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
23
82
3.0
93
.54
.14
.30
.14
20
.20
0.8
7%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Hu
bb
ard
Con
stru
ctio
nF
ully
Use
d1
64
15
.70
3.8
4.2
4.3
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Mid
dle
sex
Co
rp.
No
t Use
d1
13
11
.07
4.0
4.4
4.5
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C9
.5M
idd
lese
x C
orp
.N
ot U
sed
15
01
4.3
83
.54
.04
.30
.13
10
.10
0.7
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5P
& S
Pav
ing
No
t Use
d2
53
24
.75
4.1
4.4
4.5
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
P &
S P
avin
gF
ully
Use
d3
68
36
.18
3.4
4.3
4.5
0.1
11
0.0
90
.26
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
P &
S P
avin
gN
ot U
sed
84
8.3
63
.94
.24
.30
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5R
ain
ey
Asp
ha
ltN
ot U
sed
20
72
0.5
03
.54
.24
.40
.10
10
.10
0.4
9%
Gra
nite
FC
5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nF
ully
Use
d1
78
16
.93
3.5
4.1
4.3
0.1
81
0.0
20
.11
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Ra
ng
er
Co
nst
ruct
ion
No
t Use
d2
48
23
.74
3.7
4.0
4.2
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nF
ully
Use
d4
44
.40
3.7
4.1
4.3
0.1
10
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
70
6.8
74
.04
.24
.50
.09
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5R
an
ge
r C
on
stru
ctio
nN
ot U
sed
56
5.3
13
.74
.14
.30
.14
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
5S
on
ny R
iley
No
t Use
d2
82
.63
3.3
4.1
4.4
0.2
82
0.1
66
.16
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
Ste
ven
Co
un
ts In
c.N
ot U
sed
68
6.7
63
.84
.24
.40
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5W
hite
hur
stN
ot U
sed
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
60
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 13: District 6 Ride Distribution, All Lots
District 6
161.63 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
1677 161.63 2.8 3.9 4.5 0.20 62 5.70All Lots 3.52%
61
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 14: District 6 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 89.39 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 54.71 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 6.16 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 11.37 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
915 89.39 3.1 3.9 4.3 0.20 42 4.04FC5 Primary 4.52%575 54.71 2.8 3.9 4.2 0.14 9 0.62FC5 Interstate 1.14%69 6.16 3.7 4.3 4.5 0.15 0 0.00FC9.5 Primary 0.00%
118 11.37 3.2 3.9 4.3 0.22 11 1.03FC12.5 Primary 9.07%
62
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
32
: D
istr
ict
6 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te
4.7
5%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e2
38
23
.18
3.3
3.8
4.0
0.1
21
11
.10
7.8
4%
20
08
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
58
15
.61
3.1
3.8
4.1
0.1
71
31
.22
9.5
4%
20
09
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
43
13
.82
3.4
3.7
4.1
0.1
51
41
.32
0.8
5%
20
10
FC
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e2
42
23
.49
3.2
4.0
4.2
0.1
52
0.2
01
.50
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
13
41
3.2
93
.44
.14
.30
.17
20
.20
0.3
4%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e2
06
20
.10
3.5
3.9
4.1
0.1
11
0.0
70
.54
%2
00
9F
C5
Inte
rsta
teL
ime
sto
ne
21
42
1.0
03
.43
.94
.20
.11
20
.11
3.2
3%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
55
13
.62
2.8
4.0
4.2
0.1
96
0.4
40
.00
%2
01
1F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e6
96
.16
3.7
4.3
4.5
0.1
50
0.0
08
.83
%2
00
8F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
10
81
0.5
43
.23
.94
.30
.22
10
0.9
31
2.0
6%
20
11
FC
12
.5P
rim
ary
Lim
est
on
e1
00
.83
3.5
3.9
4.1
0.1
91
0.1
0A
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.
63
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
33
: D
istr
ict
6 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, Sys
tem
, Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
2.0
4%
15
11
4.7
03
.53
.84
.20
.15
30
.30
FC
5L
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
yF
ully
Use
d8
.50
%7
77
.28
3.4
3.8
4.1
0.1
87
0.6
2F
C5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d3
.23
%1
55
13
.62
2.8
4.0
4.2
0.1
96
0.4
4F
C5
Lim
est
on
eIn
ters
tate
Not
Use
d
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
15
11
4.7
03
.53
.84
.20
.15
30
.30
2.0
4%
All
All
Lim
est
on
eF
ully
Use
d2
32
20
.90
2.8
3.9
4.2
0.2
11
31
.06
5.0
7%
All
All
Lim
est
on
eN
ot U
sed
64
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
34
: D
istr
ict
6 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, A
gg
reg
ate
, an
d P
avin
g T
ime
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
1.5
0%
13
41
3.3
63
.14
.14
.30
.21
20
.20
FC
5D
ay
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
6.3
6%
55
65
4.1
23
.23
.84
.20
.15
36
3.4
4F
C5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
1.1
4%
57
55
4.7
12
.83
.94
.20
.14
90
.62
FC
5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Inte
rsta
te0
.00
%6
96
.16
3.7
4.3
4.5
0.1
50
0.0
0F
C9.
5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y1
2.0
6%
10
0.8
33
.53
.94
.10
.19
10
.10
FC
12
.5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
13
41
3.3
63
.14
.14
.30
.21
20
.20
1.5
0%
Da
yA
llA
llL
ime
sto
ne
12
10
11
5.8
22
.83
.94
.50
.19
46
4.1
73
.60
%N
igh
tA
llA
llL
ime
sto
ne
65
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 35: District 6 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
4.72%2007 3 23.18 1.09 4.75%1.10FC5 Primary19.90%2008 4 15.61 3.11 7.84%1.22FC5 Primary7.96%2009 4 13.82 1.10 9.54%1.32FC5 Primary
67.46%2010 3 23.49 15.85 0.85%0.20FC5 Primary85.92%2011 2 13.29 11.42 1.50%0.20FC5 Primary43.76%2008 1 20.10 8.79 0.34%0.07FC5 Interstate35.38%2009 1 21.00 7.43 0.54%0.11FC5 Interstate73.40%2010 1 13.62 9.99 3.23%0.44FC5 Interstate96.98%2011 1 6.16 5.97 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary52.50%2008 2 10.54 5.53 8.83%0.93FC12.5 Primary36.19%2011 1 0.83 0.30 12.06%0.10FC12.5 Primary
4.72%3 23.18 1.09 4.75%1.102007AllAll37.70%7 46.24 17.43 4.81%2.222008AllAll24.50%5 34.82 8.53 4.12%1.432009AllAll69.64%4 37.11 25.84 1.72%0.642010AllAll87.24%4 20.28 17.69 1.48%0.302011AllAll
66
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
36
: D
istr
ict
6 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y C
on
tra
cto
r, F
rict
ion
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
24
2.2
53
.43
.94
.10
.15
20
.12
5.3
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Asp
ha
lt G
rou
p,
Inc.
No
t Use
d1
55
13
.62
2.8
4.0
4.2
0.1
96
0.4
43
.23
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5C
om
mu
nity
Asp
hal
t C
orp
.N
ot U
sed
13
31
3.0
43
.53
.84
.20
.15
30
.30
2.3
0%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ge
ne
ral A
spha
lt C
om
pa
ny
Fu
lly U
sed
53
5.0
33
.43
.74
.10
.17
50
.50
9.9
3%
Lim
est
on
eF
C5
Ge
ne
ral A
spha
lt C
om
pa
ny
No
t Use
d1
81
.66
3.6
3.8
4.0
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5W
ee
kley
Asp
halt
Pa
vin
gF
ully
Use
dA
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.M
ate
ria
l Tra
nsf
er
De
vice
Sta
tuse
s o
f "P
art
ially
Use
d" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n" h
ave
be
en
exc
lud
ed f
rom
th
is r
ep
ort
.
67
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
68
Ride Distribution of All Lots
Figure 15: District 7 Ride Distribution, All Lots
District 7
722.58 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesLots Miles DevType
RN ≤3.5% Miles
7428 722.58 2.2 4.1 4.6 0.16 24 1.92All Lots 0.27%
69
Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
Figure 16: District 7 Ride Distribution by Friction Course and System
FC5 ‐ Primary ‐ 258.53 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC5 ‐ Interstate ‐ 297.62 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC9.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 58.13 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
FC12.5 ‐ Primary ‐ 108.31 total miles
Ride Number (RN)
% M
iles
<2.5
2.52.62.72.82.93.03.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94.04.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.84.95.0
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Friction Total TotalMin Mean Max
St.Lots MilesCourse Lots Miles Dev
RN ≤ 3.5System % Miles
2657 258.53 2.2 4.1 4.4 0.14 11 0.86FC5 Primary 0.33%3073 297.62 3.2 4.1 4.4 0.14 11 0.85FC5 Interstate 0.29%592 58.13 3.8 4.3 4.5 0.11 0 0.00FC9.5 Primary 0.00%1106 108.31 3.2 4.3 4.6 0.13 2 0.20FC12.5 Primary 0.18%
70
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ye
ar
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Sys
tem
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
37
: D
istr
ict
7 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, Y
ea
r, a
nd
Ag
gre
ga
te
1.7
3%
20
06
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
31
43
0.3
62
.24
.04
.20
.19
70
.52
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
21
22
0.7
33
.64
.14
.30
.10
00
.00
0.1
9%
20
08
FC
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
10
881
07.
23
3.3
4.1
4.4
0.1
32
0.2
00
.00
%2
00
9F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite9
18
.06
3.8
4.1
4.3
0.1
10
0.0
00
.70
%2
01
0F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
52
14
.28
3.2
4.2
4.4
0.1
41
0.1
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite3
99
38
.53
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
1F
C5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
28
72
8.5
73
.94
.24
.40
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
05
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
37
83
5.9
03
.64
.04
.30
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
06
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
51
15
0.6
13
.64
.14
.30
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
07
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
95
8.6
93
.64
.04
.20
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
20
1.9
53
.73
.94
.00
.07
00
.00
3.1
9%
20
08
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
04
9.9
93
.43
.94
.10
.12
40
.32
0.4
0%
20
09
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
52
14
9.7
73
.24
.14
.30
.12
20
.20
0.3
5%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Gra
nite
91
59
0.4
43
.24
.14
.40
.15
40
.31
0.0
0%
20
10
FC
5In
ters
tate
Lim
est
on
e1
91
.68
3.6
3.8
4.1
0.1
40
0.0
00
.04
%2
01
1F
C5
Inte
rsta
teG
ran
ite5
10
48
.60
3.2
4.2
4.4
0.1
41
0.0
20
.00
%2
00
5F
C9.
5P
rim
ary
Gra
nite
11
51
1.2
83
.84
.34
.50
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
06
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yL
ime
sto
ne
12
31
1.8
73
.84
.24
.50
.13
00
.00
0.0
0%
20
09
FC
9.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite3
54
34
.99
4.1
4.4
4.5
0.0
80
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
6F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite4
44
.19
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.1
60
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
8F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
44
13
.86
3.9
4.3
4.6
0.1
50
0.0
00
.00
%2
00
9F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
64
15
.97
4.0
4.3
4.5
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%2
01
0F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite1
86
18
.29
3.8
4.2
4.4
0.1
20
0.0
00
.45
%2
01
1F
C1
2.5
Pri
mar
yG
ran
ite4
50
44
.38
3.2
4.3
4.6
0.1
32
0.2
0A
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.
71
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Fri
ctio
nC
ou
rse
Ag
gre
ga
te
Ta
ble
38
: D
istr
ict
7 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, Sys
tem
, Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Sys
tem
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evic
e S
tatu
s
0.0
0%
12
61
2.5
24
.04
.24
.30
.07
00
.00
FC
5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.2
4%
44
64
2.0
23
.24
.24
.40
.13
10
.10
FC
5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d0
.00
%2
87
28
.57
3.9
4.2
4.4
0.0
70
0.0
0F
C5
Lim
est
on
eP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d1
.73
%1
86
18
.16
3.2
4.0
4.3
0.1
84
0.3
1F
C5
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
teF
ully
Use
d0
.03
%6
63
63
.68
3.2
4.2
4.4
0.1
31
0.0
2F
C5
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
teN
ot U
sed
0.0
0%
16
61
6.4
44
.14
.34
.40
.07
00
.00
FC
9.5
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
yN
ot U
sed
0.6
4%
31
83
1.3
93
.24
.34
.60
.15
20
.20
FC
12
.5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Fu
lly U
sed
0.0
0%
48
24
7.2
53
.84
.34
.50
.10
00
.00
FC
12
.5G
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Not
Use
d
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
r D
evi
ce S
tatu
ses
of
"Pa
rtia
lly U
sed"
an
d "
Un
kno
wn"
ha
ve b
ee
n e
xclu
ded
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
63
06
2.0
73
.24
.24
.60
.20
60
.51
0.8
3%
All
All
Gra
nite
Fu
lly U
sed
20
441
97.
96
3.2
4.2
4.5
0.1
22
0.1
20
.06
%A
llA
llG
ran
iteN
ot U
sed
72
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
ev
RN
≤ 3
.5%
Mile
sF
rict
ion
Co
urs
eA
gg
reg
ate
Ta
ble
39
: D
istr
ict
7 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y F
ric
tio
n C
ou
rse
, S
yste
m, A
gg
reg
ate
, an
d P
avin
g T
ime
Pa
vin
g T
ime
Sys
tem
0.0
0%
34
13
2.7
73
.84
.24
.40
.12
00
.00
FC
5D
ay
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.26
%1
18
81
15
.34
3.2
4.1
4.4
0.1
33
0.3
0F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.21
%2
55
22
48
.11
3.2
4.1
4.4
0.1
47
0.5
3F
C5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Inte
rsta
te2
.73
%1
23
11
.67
3.4
3.9
4.1
0.1
34
0.3
2F
C5
Nig
ht
Lim
est
on
eIn
ters
tate
0.0
0%
35
43
4.9
94
.14
.44
.50
.08
00
.00
FC
9.5
Nig
ht
Gra
nite
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%1
23
11
.87
3.8
4.2
4.5
0.1
30
0.0
0F
C9.
5N
igh
tL
ime
sto
ne
Pri
mar
y0
.00
%8
68
.24
3.8
4.2
4.5
0.1
40
0.0
0F
C1
2.5
Da
yG
ran
iteP
rim
ary
1.8
1%
11
41
1.0
23
.24
.24
.50
.19
20
.20
FC
12
.5N
igh
tG
ran
iteP
rim
ary
Ag
gre
ga
te T
ype
of
"Mix
ed
" h
as
be
en
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
re
po
rt.
Pa
vin
g T
ime
s o
f "B
oth
" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n"
ha
ve b
een
exc
lud
ed
fro
m t
his
repo
rt.
42
74
1.0
13
.84
.24
.50
.12
00
.00
0.0
0%
Da
yA
llA
llG
ran
ite &
Lim
est
on
e4
45
44
32
.98
3.2
4.1
4.5
0.1
61
61
.35
0.3
1%
Nig
ht
All
All
Gra
nite
& L
ime
sto
ne
73
Total TotalMilesProjects Miles % MilesYear
RN ≥ 4.0Miles % Miles
RN ≤ 3.5FrictionCourse System
Table 40: District 7 Pavement Smoothness Summary by Friction Course, System, and Year
82.10%2006 2 30.36 24.92 1.73%0.52FC5 Primary91.84%2007 1 20.73 19.04 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary89.27%2008 6 107.23 95.73 0.19%0.20FC5 Primary86.29%2009 2 18.83 16.25 0.21%0.04FC5 Primary96.55%2010 1 14.28 13.79 0.70%0.10FC5 Primary99.30%2011 5 67.10 66.63 0.00%0.00FC5 Primary78.03%2005 1 35.90 28.01 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate88.10%2006 2 50.61 44.59 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate77.80%2007 1 8.69 6.76 0.00%0.00FC5 Interstate34.64%2008 2 11.93 4.13 2.67%0.32FC5 Interstate88.33%2009 1 49.77 43.96 0.40%0.20FC5 Interstate76.89%2010 5 92.12 70.83 0.34%0.31FC5 Interstate92.84%2011 1 48.60 45.12 0.04%0.02FC5 Interstate99.02%2005 1 11.28 11.17 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary95.43%2006 2 11.87 11.32 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary
100.00%2009 2 34.99 34.99 0.00%0.00FC9.5 Primary95.90%2006 2 12.19 11.69 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary98.41%2008 1 13.86 13.64 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary99.44%2009 2 19.59 19.48 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary97.70%2010 2 18.29 17.87 0.00%0.00FC12.5 Primary98.20%2011 4 44.38 43.58 0.45%0.20FC12.5 Primary
83.05%2 47.18 39.19 0.00%0.002005AllAll88.10%8 105.02 92.53 0.50%0.522006AllAll87.69%2 29.42 25.80 0.00%0.002007AllAll85.33%9 133.02 113.50 0.39%0.522008AllAll93.10%7 123.17 114.67 0.19%0.242009AllAll82.19%8 124.69 102.49 0.33%0.412010AllAll97.04%10 160.08 155.33 0.14%0.222011AllAll
74
To
tal
To
tal
Min
Me
an
Ma
xS
t.L
ots
Mile
sL
ots
Mile
sD
evR
N ≤
3.5
% M
iles
Ag
gre
ga
teF
rict
ion
Cou
rse
Ta
ble
41
: D
istr
ict
7 S
tati
sti
ca
l S
um
ma
ry b
y C
on
tra
cto
r, F
rict
ion
Co
urs
e,
Ag
gre
ga
te,
and
Ma
teri
al
Tra
ns
fer
De
vic
e S
tatu
s
Co
ntr
act
or
Ma
teri
al T
ran
sfe
rD
evi
ce S
tatu
s
24
32
2.3
53
.24
.24
.40
.13
10
.10
0.4
5%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
.P.A
.C.
No
t Use
d1
64
15
.97
4.0
4.3
4.5
0.0
90
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
A.P
.A.C
.N
ot U
sed
51
04
8.6
03
.24
.24
.40
.14
10
.02
0.0
4%
Gra
nite
FC
5A
jax
Pa
vin
g In
du
stry
No
t Use
d2
60
25
.78
3.8
4.3
4.6
0.1
20
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C1
2.5
C. W
. R
ob
ert
s C
on
tra
ctin
gF
ully
Use
d3
56
34
.76
3.9
4.3
4.4
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
D.A
.B.
Co
nst
ruct
ors
No
t Use
d2
87
28
.57
3.9
4.2
4.4
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%L
ime
sto
ne
FC
5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsN
ot U
sed
26
22
5.8
74
.04
.34
.50
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5D
.A.B
. C
on
stru
cto
rsN
ot U
sed
18
61
8.1
63
.24
.04
.30
.18
40
.31
1.7
3%
Gra
nite
FC
5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
16
61
6.4
44
.14
.34
.40
.07
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
9.5
La
ne C
on
stru
ctio
n C
orp
.N
ot U
sed
58
5.6
13
.24
.24
.50
.23
20
.20
3.5
6%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
Fu
lly U
sed
56
5.4
13
.84
.14
.30
.11
00
.00
0.0
0%
Gra
nite
FC
12
.5L
ane
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
rp.
No
t Use
d1
26
12
.52
4.0
4.2
4.3
0.0
70
0.0
00
.00
%G
ran
iteF
C5
Ta
mp
a P
ave
men
t C
on
stru
cto
rsF
ully
Use
dA
gg
reg
ate
Typ
e o
f "M
ixe
d"
ha
s b
ee
n e
xclu
de
d fr
om
th
is r
ep
ort
.M
ate
ria
l Tra
nsf
er
De
vice
Sta
tuse
s o
f "P
art
ially
Use
d" a
nd
"U
nkn
ow
n" h
ave
be
en
exc
lud
ed f
rom
th
is r
ep
ort
.
75
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
76
Appendix
A
INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESSINDEX REPORT SUMMARY
A1
PAGE
LEFT
BLANK
A2
WHAT IS THE INTERNATIONAL ROUGHNESS INDEX?
In "Guidelines for Conducting and Calibrating Road Roughness Measurements," published by theWorld Bank in 1986 as Technical Paper 46, International Roughness Index (IRI) is defined as amathematical transform (a property) of a true profile describing surface roughness that causesvehicle vibration.
The underlying IRI model is a series of differential equations that relate the motions of a simulatedquarter-car to a road profile. The IRI is computed as a linear accumulation of the simulatedsuspension motion, normalized by the length of the profile. IRI therefore has units of slope,typically "in/mi" or "m/km", and is computed from a single longitudinal wheel path profile. It has ademonstrated strong compatibility with the equipment used to develop pavement managementsystems. IRI is sensitive to wavelengths between 4 and 100 feet and is most sensitive towavelengths of 7 and 50 feet.
All data is analyzed according to ASTM E1926, "Standard Practice for Computing InternationalRoughness Index of Roads from Longitudinal Profile Measurements".
This summary expresses ride quality using International Roughness Index (IRI). This index waschosen to be used in future versions of FDOT's smoothness specifications because it is notinfluenced by differences in texture. Currently, FDOT's smoothness specifications use RideNumber (RN) to indicate the level of smoothness present on newly placed asphalt pavements. RN,however, is greatly influenced by differences in texture, especially dense graded versus opengraded pavements.
The full International Roughness Index edition of this report can be found at the following link andis titled "Flexible Pavement Smoothness Acceptance Report - International Roughness IndexEdition".
http://materials.dot.state.fl.us/smo/administration/resources/library/publications/researchreports/2011-2015.htm
A3
Many roadway characteristics and construction practices are being monitored and included in theFDOT's smoothness database. Some of these have proven to be significant contributors to the ridequality of the pavements tested, and some factors have not been so valuable. Below is a summarylist of key variables being monitored with a brief explanation of their effect on pavementsmoothness.
Aggregate Type - Based on summary data from Florida projects, smooth pavements can beconstructed regardless of the aggregate type used. However, on average, pavements usingGranite aggregate in friction courses are smoother. Granite pavements have an averageIRI of 48, compared to an IRI of 56 for Limestone pavements.
Binder Type - No significant difference was found when comparing the smoothness ofpavements using polymer-modified binders in the friction course to pavements using othertypes of binders.
Paving Time - No significant difference was found when comparing the smoothness ofpavements placed at Night to those placed during the Day.
System - No significant difference was found when comparing the smoothness of Primaryand Interstate systems.
International Roughness Index Report Observations
Surface Type - No significant difference was found when comparing the smoothness, interms of IRI, of pavements with open-graded friction courses and dense-graded frictioncourses.
In addition to these factors, there are many other variables that the data can be subdivided by. Ifany additional information is needed, please use the contact information located at the bottom ofpage 7.
Material Transfer Device (MTD) Usage - Data shows that pavements placed using thisequipment are typically smoother. When the MTD was used on the entire project, theaverage IRI is 46, versus 55 IRI when the MTD was not used at all. MTD usage on theInterstate system yielded even more benefit: 43 IRI with full-project MTD usage versus 55for Interstate projects where the MTD was not used at all.
Data by Year - Pavements placed in 2005 averaged 54 IRI, and have since shown a trendof improvement. Pavements placed in 2011 averaged 50 IRI.
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - Analysis on Interstate pavements has shown that150,000 AADT or greater exhibit higher average IRIs. Interstate pavements with AADT lessthan 150,000 have an average IRI of 48, compared to an IRI of 66 for Interstate pavementswith AADT equal to or greater than 150,000.
A4
Appendix
B
CUSTOMER SERVICE FORM
B1
Customer Service Form
In an effort to continuously improve our customer service, the Pavement Material Systems section of the State Materials Office requests your input by filling out and returning this survey form.
Your Name:
(Optional)Company/Office/Organization:
Address:
City:
Title:
Phone: E-Mail:
Please rate each of the following factors using the scale provided. A "1" corresponds to Very Poor , and a "5" corresponds to
Usefulness of Content
Organization of Information
Clarity of Graphical Information
Format of Tables
Overall Value of this Report
Please provide an answer to the following questions. Use additional sheet(s) if necessary.
What was the most useful/informative part of this report?
Excellent .
What was the least useful/informative part of this report?
What changes would you recommend to improve this report?
Or E-Mail to:
Detach and mail to:FDOT State Materials Office
Attn: Stacy Scott5007 NE 39th Ave.
Gainesville, FL 32609
State: ZIP:
stacy.scott@dot.state.fl.us
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
B2
top related