spelling and pronunciation by alkhima macarompis
Post on 09-Dec-2014
874 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Spelling and Pronunciation
by
Alkhima M. Macarompis
OUTLINE
1. Definition of Terms
1.1 Spelling
- The written trace of word.
- The use of letters to form words.
1.1 Pronunciation
- The way in which a sound, word, or language is articulated, especially in conforming to an accepted standard.
2. Spelling
2.1 Examples of different spellings for the same sound
2.2 Examples of The same spellings for different sounds
2.3 Examples of Silent letters
2.4 Examples of missing letters
2.5 Middle English Period
2.6 Modern English Period
2.7 The Great Vowel Shift
3. Spelling Pronunciation
If writing represented the spoken language perfectly, spelling reformers would never have
arisen. The irregularities between graphemes (letters) and phonemes have been cited as one reason
‘why Johnny can’t read’. Different spellings for the same sound, the same spellings for different sounds,
‘silent letters’, and ‘missing letters’ – all provide fuel for the flames of spelling-reform movements. Here
are examples:
Same sound, Different sounds, Silent letters Missing lettersdifferent spelling same spelling
aye thought listen use/juz/
buy though debt fuse/fjuz/
die gnosis
hi know
Thai psychology
Height right
Guide sword
At the beginning of the Middle English period, which dates from the Norman Conquest of 1066,
the language was still quite highly inflectional. By the end of the period the relationship between the
elements of the sentence depended basically on word order. As early as 1200 the three or four
grammatical case forms of nouns in the singular had been reduced to two, and to denote the plural the
noun ending (e)s had been adopted.
In the early part of the Modern English period the vocabulary was enlarged by the widespread
use of one part of speech for another and by increased borrowings from other languages.
The many changes that have occurred in the sound system of English, like The Great Vowel Shift,
were not always reflected in changes in the spelling of the words that were affected. When the printing
press was introduced in the fifteenth century, not only were archaic pronunciations ‘frozen’, but the
spelling did not always represent even those pronunciations, because many of the early printers were
Dutch and were unsure of English pronunciation.
During the Renaissance, in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, many scholars who revealed
Classical Greek and Latin became ‘spelling reformers’. Unlike the later reformers who wished to change
the spelling to conform to pronunciation, these scholars changed the spelling of English words to
conform to their etymologies- the ‘original’ Latin, or Greek, or French spellings. Where the Latin had a b,
they added a b even if it was not pronounced; and shown by these few examples:
Middle English Spelling “Reformed Spelling”
Indite indict
dette debt
receit receipt
oure hour
Modern English orthography does not always represent what we know about the phonology of
the language. The disadvantage is partially offset by the fact that the writing system allows us to read
and understand what people wrote of years ago without the need for translations.
Today’s language is no more static that was yesterday’s; it would be impossible to maintain a
perfect correspondence between pronunciation and spelling. We do not mean to say that certain
reforms would not be helpful. Some ‘respelling’ is already taking place; advertisers often spell though as
tho, through as thru, and night as nite. For a period of time the old Nation Review used some modified
spellings and ceases using capitals for proper nouns. Other publications did not follow suit, however.
Spelling habits are hard to change.
In the case of homophones, it is helpful at times to have different spellings for the same sounds,
as in the following pair:
The book was red. The book was read.
There are also reasons for using the same spelling for different pronunciations. It was shown
that a morpheme may be pronounced differently when it occurs in different contexts, and that in most
cases the pronunciation is ‘regular’; that is, it is determined by rules that apply throughout the language.
The identical spelling reflects the fact that the different pronunciations represent the same morpheme.
Similarly, the phonetic realizations of the vowels in the following forms are ‘regular’.
divine/divinity serene/serenity sane/sanity
sublime/sublimate obscene/obscenity profane/profanity
sign/signature clean/cleanse humane/humanity
The spelling of such pairs thus reflects our knowledge of the sound pattern of the language and
the semantic-morphological relations between the words.
Other examples provide further evidence. The b in ‘debt’ may remind us of the related word
debit, in which the b is pronounced.
It is doubtful that anyone would suggest that the plural morpheme should be spelled s in cats
and z in dogs. The sound of the morpheme is determined by rules, in this case as in other cases.
There is another important reason why spelling should not always be tied to the phonetic
pronunciation of words. Different dialects of English have divergent pronunciations. While dialectal
pronunciations differ, the common spellings represent the fact that we understand each other. It is
necessary for the written language to transcend local dialects. If each dialect were spelt according to its
own pronunciation, written communication among the English-speaking peoples of the world would
suffer more than the spoken communication does today.
Despite the primacy of the spoken over the written language, the written word is often regarded
with excessive reverence. The stability, permanency, and graphic nature of writing cause some people to
favor it over ephemeral and elusive speech. Writing has however affected speech only marginally, and
most notably in the phenomenon of spelling pronunciation. Since the sixteenth century, we find that
spelling has to some extent influenced standard pronunciation. The most important of such changes
stem from the eighteenth-century under the influenced and ‘decrees’ of the dictionary-makers and the
schoolteachers. The struggle between those who demanded that words be pronounced according to the
spelling and those who demanded that words be spelt according to their pronunciations generated
great heat in the century. The ‘preferred’ pronunciations were given in the many dictionaries printed in
the eighteenth century, and the ‘supreme authority’ of the dictionaries influenced pronunciation in this way.
Spelling also has influenced pronunciation in words that are infrequently used in normal daily
speech. Many words that were spelt with an initial h were not pronounced with any /h/ sound as late as
the eighteenth century. Thus, at that time no /h/ was pronounced in honest, hour, habit, heretic, hotel,
hospital, herb. Frequently used words like honest and hour continued to be pronounced without the /h/,
despite the spelling but all those other words were given a ‘spelling pronunciation’. Because people did
not hear them often, when they saw them written they concluded that they must begin with an /h/.
Although the written language has some influence on the spoken, it does not change the basic
system – the grammar—of the language. The writing system, conversely, reflects, in a more or less
direct way, the grammar that every speaker knows.
top related