sms lang analysis
Post on 12-Jan-2015
4.614 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
1
SMS Language
Presented to:
Miss Shagufta Jabeen
Presented by:
Hina Javaid
ID# 100884006
Mphil Applied Linguistics
Batch VIII
2
SMS Language
University of Management & Technology
Table of contents
Sr.n
o
Topics Pg.no
1 Topic for analysis
2 Abstract
3 The selection rationale
4 Introduction
4.1 What Is Sms
4.2 Objective of SMS language
4.3 History of Sms
4.4 SMS Language
4.5 Features of Sms language
4.4 Use of Sms
5 Literature review
6 discourse analysis of SMS/text analysis
sample selection rationale
3
SMS Language
6.1 Gricean co-operative principle and Maxim’s
6.2 Language play and ethnography and politeness
6.3 Code-switching
6.4 Psychoanalysis of the Sms language
6.4 Critical Discourse Analysis
6.5 Difference in teen and elderly people’s text language
7 Discussion (Scope of this analysis/new directions)
8 Conclusion
9 References
10 Appendix
Chapter 1
Topic for analysis
Discourse analysis of SMS language as e
novel genre
SMS language has revolutionary and influential effect on everyday
language
SMS language of teens differ from the elderly people
4
SMS Language
Chapter 2
Abstract
This project intends to analyze the SMS language ethnographically and psychologically within
the domain of discourse analysis and critical discourse analysis.
CMC technology (Computer-mediated Communication) has diversified the way of
communication to many genres. Texting emerged as a novel genre in 20th century and caused
the revolution of language at its heart. ‘Texting’ or ‘SMS’ language has great potential to
influence language inclusively and is a growing area of interest within Applied Linguistics. Its
non-gloom-and-doom impression has convinced the linguists that this innovative, extended and
diversified modality of communication has proved itself in every aspect whether it is an issue
regarding its lexicology, morphology and syntactic levels or its apprehension by the
sociolinguists to roll over the process of pidgin and Creole. SMS language brings into play
5
SMS Language
abbreviations, acronyms, random-seeming jumbles of letters and numbers. This typo-texting
has obtained many permanent terms and also lots of ephemeral neologisms, but who knows
what is next? As from gaming chats to blog comments to text messages more and more terms,
within this new genre language, are cropping up every day. In this project of CDA I intend to
analyze these three dimensions specific to SMS language:
Discourse analysis of SMS language as e novel genre
SMS language has revolutionary and influential effect on everyday language
SMS language of teens differ from the elderly people
To analyze these assumptions I would apply discourse analysis, ethnographical analysis, code-
switching and psychoanalysis. The discourse analysis will help me to delve deep into the
nature of SMS language. Further I would apply ethnography approach on SMS language to
scrutinize the impact of this novel genre on other spoken and written languages. In order to
refine and substantiate my analysis I would pour comparative study and psychoanalysis into
the project which will assist in conforming and to reflect the underlying assumptions regarding
the use of language in SMS, teens language and language used in SMS by elderly people.
Chapter 3
The selection rationale:
Instead of selecting stereotypical discourses to analyze, I opted for a distinctive and digressive
field which is absolutely novel, entirely modern and utterly influential on traditionally
constructed language. Short Messaging Service (SMS) has started contributing a major role in
our life; it became a necessity and culture. It has its own moods, styles, expression, alphabets
(or I must say alphanumeric) but no rules, no regulation and no check and balance. A general
assumption is prevailing that SMS language is corrupting our language as Lee, 2002 states, “(it
is) a continuing assault of technology on formal written language use.”
This project will facilitate further research proposals as it varies from psychological to social and
ordinary language to revolutionary diversified language which itself is replete with free hand
6
SMS Language
variations like code-switching, code mixing, abbreviation, acronym, smiley, pictogram, rebus
emoticons and so on.
7
SMS Language
Chapter 4
Introduction:
Think like a wise man but communicate in the language of the people.
William Butler Yeats (1865 - 1939)
Computer-mediated communication (CMC) whether synchronous (real-time) or asynchronous
(delayed time) has manifested many divergences and convergences of language and paved way
for a revolutionary influential novel genre. And now we can see that mobile phones are
everywhere, in our hands, sitting on our desks, in the media, in the class, in the meeting and
constantly buzzing, jumbling and fluttering fingers tips can be witnessed.
According to statistics there were 2.4 billion active users of SMS text messaging, but in 2008 it
augmented to 3 billion (Moore, Anderson) and at the present 76% of the mobile phone users
are texters as well. As compared to other communication mediums, SMS and its language has
great potential to influence language inclusively and is a growing area of interest within Applied
Linguistics. Social acceptability of SMSs has fully-grown to the extent that there are
approximately 30 billion SMS messages sent globally each month (Courtesy: GSM digital mobile
phone standard).
CMC
Internet-based/PC based
IM chatChat rooms
e-mailswww
MUD & MOO
Language: netspeak, weblish, netlish, cyberspeak
Mobile/cell-based
anterior messagelanguage:
texting, text, SMS, message,
8
SMS Language
4.1 What is SMS?
Short Message Service (SMS) is the text
communication service component of phone,
web or mobile communication systems, using
standardized communications protocols that
allow the exchange of short text messages
between fixed line or mobile phone devices.
(Wikipedia)
Short Messaging Service, otherwise known as text messaging, mobile messaging, or
alphanumeric paging is a digital cellular network feature which emerged during the 20th century
and now is widespread enough to be established as a novel genre within the domain of
language and communication.(courtesy:funSMS.net)
Basically a message is meant to be a way of communication or a way to pass on the information
through some sources. Short Message Service or text messaging has paved the way of
transmitting information in a fast and furious way which is time saving, swift and available easily
to everyone now-a-days. SMS is an asynchronous mode of communication as it does not
require receiver to be online simultaneously rather there are lapses of time between replies
(exception is for some latest iphones). It employs writing as means of expression and is
considered unimodel or monomodel in its setting.
4.2 Objective of SMS language
The objective of SMS is to send speedy information while sacrificing the grammar, punctuation,
which has become a habit and acceptance in our culture.
4.3 History of SMS:
SMS is considered to be originated from radio telegraphy in radio memo pagers using
standardized phone protocols. Later, it was defined as part of the Global System for Mobile
9
SMS Language
Communications (GSM) series of standards in 1985 as a means of sending messages of up to
160 characters, to and from GSM mobile handsets.
4.4 SMS language:
Wikipedia defines SMS language that,“SMS language or Textese (also known as txtese,
chatspeak, txt, txtspk, txtk, txto, txtk, texting language, txt lingo, or txt talk) is a term
for the abbreviations and slang most commonly used due to the necessary brevity of
mobile phone text messaging, in particular the widespread SMS (short message service)
communication protocol. SMS language is also common on the Internet, including in
email and instant messaging. It can be likened to a rebus, using pictures and single letters or
numbers to represent whole words (e.g. "i <3 u" which uses the pictogram of a heart for love,
and the letter u replaces you).”
We can generally say that the terms ‘text messaging’ or just ‘texting’ refer to the brief typed
messages sent using the SMS (‘short message service’) of mobile/cell phones, PDAs (‘personal
digital assistants’), smart phones or web browsers. This service had developed enough that
there are images, videos and music embedded in text messages to modify the need of
communication.
SMS language emerged in previous century as a complete new language far more deviated
from the traditional grammar stricken language. There is an assumption that SMS language is
patterned according to the age, gender, region and qualification of the people. These are new
dimensions to be studied under the province of discourse analysis and other linguistic studies.
Sms technology has developed so far that the phenomenon of convergence and divergence of
the boundary between social, personal, interpersonal, marketing and broadcast messages is
fused or we can say rather confused.
4.5 Features of SMS language
As compared to the Computer mediated communication, mobile phone technology provides
small equipment eponymously ‘mobile’ that is more affordable among texters as an
10
SMS Language
unobtrusive and relatively inexpensive means of communication. As far as language of SMS is
concerned it includes formal and informal features both i.e. the use of written facial expression
(emoticons), the choice of words with amalgamation of numeric and so on. The dominant
features of Sms language are:
Abbreviations Contractions, shortening, clippings Acronym or initialisms code-mixing code-switching Slang Syntactic reductions Accent stylization Asterisk emoting Letter/number homophones Misspellings an typos Emticons Smileys Rebus Onomatopoeic, exclamatory spellings (e.g. haha! arrrgh!
WOOHOO! rahh, ahhh Deletion of parts of speech:
o subject pronouno prepositiono punctuationo articleso copulao auxiliary/model verbso contractionso ignore capitalization
The variation of using words, alphanumeric or acronym depends on the type of
message and also the context of the texter’s time and effort. The representative
keypad of mobile phone is designed in a way that the texter has to type on
‘multitap’ that means to press same key 3-4 times to get the desired alphabet
(not applicable to iphone and 3g phone) and also have to keep in mind the
11
SMS Language
character limitation of words to 160 which results in cumbersome,
terse and rude text input. Although a T9 mode that is dictionary mode
is offered in almost all mobiles but the use of type/style is specific to
the texter. With the advent of SMS language a whole new alphabet
emerged because SMS messages took a long time to enter and were
quite abrupt as people attempted to say as much as possible with as
few keystrokes. Abbreviations such as “C U L8er” for “See you later”
sprung up for timesaving and coolness. The use of “smileys” to reduce
the abruptness of the medium and to help indicate the mood of the person in a way that was
difficult with just text became popular.
4.6 Use of Sms language
The product of short space and typing complexity has its users of all ages. From teens to adults,
elders to older ones can be spotted texting everywhere. But the use of texting has increased its
scope to marketing, advertising and commercial field so much that the President of America
Obama was marked using text message to journalists and Democratic Party senators and
supporters to announce his choice of vice-presidential running mate. This act has raised a lot of
questions on the advent and scope of SMS language use.
12
SMS Language
Chapter 5
Literature Review:
Being a modern technology based language, SMS language only really went ‘live’ in the mid-
1990s, and it took scholars a while to attend to texting (Thurlow & Poff 2010). Since the early
2000s, however, research from a range of disciplines and a number of countries has been
growing. The increasing work done within this field shows the great interest of the
scholars/researchers to the importance, acceptance and application of texting but
simultaneously much fuss has been made over the dangerous or poisonous nature of SMS
language too.
Carter (2003) research indicated that the computer mediated communication
environment precludes the exchange of nonverbal communication cues normally
present in face-to-face conversations.
Ling (2005) has studied and documented the tenant linguistic characteristics of text
messaging which include infrequent abbreviation (343) and infrequent punctuation and
capitalization (344).
Ling & Baron (2007) created a more specific and thorough list of these and other
linguistic characteristics of SMS language.
Segerstad (2005), Fandrych (2007), and Carter (2003) also opined that SMS language
mimics the spoken word.
Researches on SMS/text language vary from medicine to academics, environmental
development psychology have looked at many dimension like compulsive texting, cyberbullying,
use of texting for patient reminders, texting as library support, as a pedagogical tool, political
campaigning. Within the Cross-cultural contexts, gender and age pattern with reference to
syntactic complex sentences in texts and stylistic techniques has shown a discrepancy to new
vistas. In the Pragmalinguistic contexts, more emphasize is put on stereotypical features
including use of abbreviations (e.g. txt), letter number homophones (e.g. gr8), and non-
13
SMS Language
standard spelling (e.g. luv), dropping the closing and opening words, texting as status symbol
and code-switching
Books related to the topic:
1. SMS Language - Text Message Abbreviations: quick reference ebook
2. Txtng: The Gr8 Db8 by David Crystal
3. Language and the Internet by David Crystal
4. A glossary of netspeak and textspeak by David Crystal
5. Computer-mediated communication: linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives by
Susan C. Herring
6. The Language Revolution by David Crystal
7. CyberSociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community by
Steve Jones
8. Always on: language in an online and mobile world by Naomi S. Baron
9. The inside text: social, cultural and design perspectives on SMS by Richard Harper,
Leysia Ann Palen, Alex S. Taylor
10. Email, SMS, MMS: the linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the new media
age by Carmen Frehner
14
SMS Language
Chapter 6
Discourse analysis of SMS/text messaging
Sample selection:
For the analysis of SMS/text messaging, I have taken sample from my own friends, their
messages sent to me, my replies to them and also available examples available on Google
image search. The justification for using such online data is to give glimpse at a general
conception of messages overall.
Approaches to be used for text analysis
Gricean maxims
Politeness theory
Code-switching
Ethnography
Psychoanalysis
Analysis:
6.1 Gricean co-operative principle and Maxim’s:
Based on my own corpus of real text messages and some variant online available text iphones
and other messages, Gricean cooperative principle and maxim’s can be analyzed against the
orthographical/typographical practices in these messages. Grice defined the principle of
cooperation as follows: 'during the talk the current stage, you talk to the party as a participant
in your turn-out in the discourse should be in line with common speech recognition goals or
direction.’ Thus the mechanism of text language works under the cooperation principle and its
four basic criteria or maxims to provide its texters socialize in a positive way. A broad analysis of
these messages indicates that these texts bolster three of the key discourse/pragmatics maxims
of Grice which all serves one general principle of ‘sociality’. These being
1. Brevity and speed
15
SMS Language
2. Paralinguistic restitution
3. Phonological approximation
6.1.1 Brevity and speed:
First maxim, being a twofold maxim of brevity and speed in manifested in terms of most
commonly used
a) Abbreviations of lexical items ( alphanumeric or including letter number homophones)
b) Relatively minimum use of capitalization and standard, grammatical punctuation (e.g.
commas and spaces between words)
Now if we go for the reasons of such typo reduction, it will be clear that such so-called
discourse is context-based or pragmatically motivated. As I have discussed in introduction that
the limit of an SMS is 160 characters only so the brevity is little dependent on technology
constraints but the option to send as many as messages as texter can send and the SMS
packages at lowest rates minimize this vulnerability of this factor. Under the manifestation of
Grice’s maxim we can analyze the pragmatic or contextual factor of the texter as well. In sample
14, 15, 17 we can see the ease of turn-taking (i.e. back-and-forth exchanges) which is totally
mingled up. There is more fluidity of social interaction but still there are variations in the
reciprocity and response time of the texters because synchronous and asynchronous tools lack
the face-to-face conventions of turn-taking, floor taking and adjacency pairs, with implications
for rate of topic decay, coherence and cohesion, and simultaneous and overlap of messages.
6.1.2 Paralinguistic restitution:
It reasonably seeks to restore the visible loss of such socio-emotional or prosodic features as
stress and intonation, while phonological approximation (e.g. accent stylization) adds to
paralinguistic restitution and creates the kind of playful, informal register appropriate to the
relational orientation of texting. On occasion, the second and third maxims appear to override
the brevity-speed maxim (Spilioti 2009), but in most cases all principles are served
simultaneously and equally. Thus, for the sake of paralinguistic restitution, capitalization (e.g.
WHAZZUP) and multiple punctuation (what???!!!) may be more desirable for texters. Lexical
16
SMS Language
items such as ello (‘hello’), goin (‘going’), and bin (‘been’), meanwhile, serve both the need for
abbreviation and phonological approximation.
It is noteworthy here that the texters follow ‘write it as if saying it’ to set up a more informal
register, which in turn helps to do the kind of small-talk and bonding they desire for maximizing
sociality.
6.2 Language play and ethnography and politeness:
‘Besta luck’, ‘boo hoo’ are such playful acts and means on behalf of the texters which they use
to affirm their social identities by deviating from conventional forms; in doing so, they
differentiate themselves (from adults, for example) and align themselves with each other.
Texting facilitates an interesting mix of intimacy and social distance. There develops a relative
anonymity between the sender and the receiver that is universal in its nature because still if
the texters know each other, there are complicated traditional boundaries between private and
public image. The face-saving capacity of this type of anonymity likewise accounts for texters
who send messages to say something they would ordinarily avoid having to say face-to-face,
such as breaking up with a romantic partner or, in the case of our own study, discussing an
unexpected pregnancy. Ling and Yttri (2002:164) have referred it as the ‘culture of concealed
use’ as texting nicely facilitates this kind of co-present exchange, allowing texters to interact
covertly in an immediate and potentially very intimate form of
communication.
Analysis:
In the samples 1-9 and 16 there is syntactic brevity of morphological
items. No punctuation and contraction of words to few letters
conforms to the above discussion. Thus the use of ‘fyr’ in place of
‘fire’, s’’ in place of ‘is’, deletion of ‘e’ at the end of ‘house’, small ‘i’
indicate the texters’ intention to be brief as much as he/she can and
also to restore the paralinguistic features.
17
SMS Language
In the sample 14, 15 there is another example of brevity and speed, not morphological but
discourse related. What does ‘pizza tonight?’ has to do alone with the ‘sounds good to us….’
This kind of ellipsis takes form of sentential contraction whose sole aim is to be speedy, less
wordy and more socialize.
6.3 Code-switching:
“In linguistics, code-switching is the concurrent use of more than one language, or language
variety, in conversation” (Wikipedia). People of multi language use the codes and registers of
their own language and amalgamate it with the metalanguage to converse in a new style. This
code-switching is different from other language contact phenomena, such as borrowing, pidgins
and creoles, loan translation (calques), and language transfer (language interference). Now the
question arises that what are the latent reasons to use code-switching or to use multi-
languages in Sms. The answer lies in the paralinguistic features related to the text messaging
i.e. the fluency effect, dominancy maintaining, as a fashion code or to give a intimate relative
anonymity effect. Code mixing is a thematically related term, but the usage of the terms code-
switching and code-mixing varies. Both terms denote the same practice, but still some scholars
apply code-mixing to denote the formal linguistic properties of said language-contact
phenomena, and code-switching to denote the actual, spoken usages by multilingual persons.
Whatever the use is, code-switching relates to, and sometimes indexes social-group
membership in bilingual and multilingual communities. Socio-linguistics describes the
relationships between code-switching behaviors and class, ethnicity, and other social positions.
Analysis:
The exemplified corpus is an example of code-switching, in which
‘challo’ is an Urdu word taken in place of expression of ‘let it go,
well etc’. Such type of code-switching can be interpreted as
fashion symbol or language style/attitude or may be as gaining
approval in a social situation or to show intimacy. In Urdu such
words are used as fillers or habitual terms and its translation in
English also vary within the discourse markers and fillers.
18
SMS Language
6.4 Psychoanalysis of the Sms language:
The underlying psyche of texters, with regard to my own corpus, indicates the creative process
of social and personal consciousness of the society and the texters as well. The effect of one
newly developed alpha-numeric and use of symbols within language is not solely bound to a
single region or person or society. Rather it, along with other features, has profound effects on
the cultures, societies and individuals. At individual level, the unconscious mimicking of
symbols, contraction, numeric use, acronyms etc reflects the hidden desire of texters to come
up with the social status level with the peers. Texting in a more irregular or untraditional way
has also made teens and adults a kind of fashion freak which clearly mirrors the core
complexities of human personalities. Other areas discussed under psychoanalysis within the
domain of SMS are text bullying, anger shown via smiley and emoticons (:@ = angry).
Analysis:
The corpus 7 & 8 represent the forwarded messages in its true
terminology. The language and discourse can be interpreted as a
way to persuade and socialize the thought of texter. Regardless of
its typical text message orthographical/typographical form, such
type of text messages reflect the interest and inclination of behavior
of the texter, whereas the reason to forward such messages are to
socialize, motivate, convey own thoughts via quotations, jokes etc,
to peruse some dear one in covert way and so on. In the sample 7,
no spelling consideration ‘semi-column’ states the intellectual level
of the texters as well, as this message has been forwarded through
many mobile holders who are masters level qualified but still no one
has bothered to correct the spelling. It clearly indicates the
indifferent attitude of young ones toward the language and its deterioration.
6.4 Critical Discourse Analysis:
19
SMS Language
“The strengths of CDA lie in making connections between social and cultural structures and processes on the one hand, and properties of text on the other” (Fairclough & Wodak, 1997:277).
The social interaction happens within the discursive practices, which produce text, so through
the analysis of text messages; evidence of social practices can be revealed or noted. The
discursive practices are influenced by the situation or environment in which a participant is.
Fairclough (1992) contends that every
discourse instance has three dimensions:
1. either spoken or written text;
2. it is an interaction between people
involving processes of producing and
interpreting the text;
3. Or it is part of social action, and in
some cases, virtually the whole of it.
Copyright © 2008, IGI Global
Within this framework of analyzing Sms/text language, the dimension of discursive practice
upon which texters draw a new style of language is identified and linked to the underlying
power relations, which may be reproduced by the interaction. The production of text draws its
meanings from the social practice and vice versa. Thus the ethnographical practice also deals
with the text within the context of interaction as a part of social action. The production of this
type of new genre is bound to the social production and social conditions of interpreting it.
20
SMS Language
6.5 Difference in teen and elderly people’s text language:
My analysis of difference in SMS language according to age pattern couldn’t affirm my assumption but the reason behind can be the lacking of sample as I could avail only one SMS from an elderly person and one from teen. Both were same in contracting the words, although use of ‘x’ which is more modern use occurred in the sample of the teen.
21
SMS Language
Chapter 7
SMS/text language as a new genre:
The linguistic and communicative practices of text-messages emerged from a particular
combination of technological affordances, contextual variables and interactional priorities. Thus
SMS/text language came into being as a new hybrid or a creolizing blend of written and spoken
discourse. The kinds of orthographic (or typographic) choices that texters make in their
messages are motivated primarily by pragmatic and communicative concerns. Research focuses
on the linguistic (and orthographic) form of texting; the defining feature of text messages is
ultimately their sociable function. Text-messages are thus communicative events only
superficially recognizable from their look; their real significance (in both semantic and social
terms) lies primarily in their discursive content and communicative intent.
Useful genre-defining feature of texting ot text messages thus lies in typical discursive features:
(a) The comparatively short length of text-messages;
(b) The relative concentration of non-standard typographic markers; and
(c) Their predominantly small-talk content
But it is noteworthy here that these generic and stylistic features are not plenty individually to
characterize texting. If we compare this genre to other formal letters and academic essay they
also com up with chatty features and short length but what makes this language distinctive
genre is its social usefulness in any culture scenario.
22
SMS Language
Discussion (Scope or new direction):
I started this project with a passion of a zeitgeist and my analysis embodies the same pattern of
thought at the end. We are living in an age where the diminutive, the brief and the simple are
highly prized in communication. Clearly, texting embodies this zeitgeist. The history of the
development of so-called new communication technologies i.e. IM chat, MUDs ad so on, has
been marked by periods of excessive hype and hysteria about the kinds of cultural, social and
psychological impacts each new technology is likely to have. Study within these technologies
warrant many researches and same is the case with SMS language especially from discourse
analysts and other language and communication scholars. It would be bad luck not to mention
here that US President Barack Obama and his campaign organizers announced his vice-
presidential running mate in August 2008 via text massage. Such use of SMS language in
political discourse as a persuasive content has extended the mental constituency of researchers
to turn and do research in this specific field which has attained so much importance.
I also came in account an example on internet used by President
Bush to warn Iraq by using SMS language including rebus,
contractions and aggressive language. The use of rebus has some
psychoanalytical implications as well. As the use of pictogram
indicate the mental phenomenon of the texter to socialize via
societal terms and conditions. The pictograms used in this text are
universally known (although not all). Such innovation in political
discourse province also accounts for the face-saving strategies as
the pictograms help the texter to deviate the attention of the
reader from the aggressive impression of the text.
23
SMS Language
References:
Lee, Carmenforth. Texts and practices of micro-blogging: Status updates on Facebook. In Language in the New Media: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, C. Thurlow and K. Mroczek (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shortis, Tim 2007a Gr8 txtpectations: The creativity of text spelling. English Drama Media Thompson, Lee and Julie Cupples 2008 Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality. Social &Cultural Geography 9 (1): 95-108.
http://www.google.com.pk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=gM6&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=language+attitudes+towards+text-messages+%28SMS%29+in+pakistan&oq=language+attitudes+towards+text-messages+%28SMS%29+in+pakistan&aq=f&aqi=&aql=f&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=3798490l3802672l0l13l13l0l12l0l0l552l552l5-1
http://www.oppapers.com/subjects/does-sms-language-affects-english-language-page1.html
http://kshif01.wordpress.com/
http://www.funsms.net/sms_dictionary.htm
24
SMS Language
Appendix:
Transcripts:
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
25
SMS Language
10 11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
top related