seminar lsd 2005 bw
Post on 07-Apr-2018
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
1/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 1
Subspace Identification of
Hammerstein and Wiener Models
Subspace Identification ofSubspace Identification of
Hammerstein and Wiener ModelsHammerstein and Wiener Models
Speaker
Juan C. Gmez
Laboratory for System Dynamics and Signal ProcessingFCEIA, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
ARGENTINA
jcgomez@fceia.unr.edu.ar
Research SeminarResearch Seminar
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 2
OutlineOutlineOutline
Introduction: Motivation, New results
A (veryvery) brief review on Subspace State-Space System IDentifi-
cation Methods Block-oriented Nonlinear Models
Subspace Identification of Hammerstein Models
Subspace Identification of Wiener Models
Simulation Examples
Conclusions
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
2/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 3
Most physical processes have a nonlinear behaviour, except in a
limited range where they can be considered linear. The performance of controllers designed from a linear approxi-
mation is strongly influenced by a change in the operating point
of the system.
Nonlinear models are able to describe more accurately the global
behaviour of the system, independently of the operating point.
Many dynamical systems can be represented by the inter-
connection of static nonlinearities and LTI systems. These models
are called blockblock--orientedoriented nonlinear models.
IntroductionIntroductionIntroduction
Motivation for Nonlinear (Subspace) Identification Motivation for NonlinearMotivation for Nonlinear ((SubspaceSubspace)) IdentificationIdentification
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 4
Subspace Methods have been very successful for the identification of
LTI models in many practical applications.
Although there is a well developed theory for Subspace Identification
methods for LTI systems, this is not the case for nonlinear systems.
Some recent contributions in this area are: (Verhaegen & Westwick,
1996) in Subspace Identification of Hammersterin and Wiener models,and (Chen & Maciejowski, 2000) and (Favoreel et al., 1999) in
Subspace Identification of bilinear systems.
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
3/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 5
New subspace algorithms for the simultaneous identification of the
linear and nonlinear parts ofmultivariable Hammersteinmultivariable Hammerstein and WienerWiener
models are presented.
The proposed algorithms consist basically of two steps:
StepStep 1:1: a standard (linear) subspace algorithm applied to an
equivalent linear system whose inputs (outputs) are filtered (by
the basis functions describing the static nonlinearities)
versions of the original inputs (outputs).
StepStep 2:2: a 2-norm minimization problem which is solved via
an SVD.
Provided the conditions for the consistency of the linear subspacealgorithm used in Step 1 are satisfied, consistencyconsistency of the estimates can
be guaranteed.
The new results (Gomez & Baeyens, 2005) The new resultsThe new results (Gomez & Baeyens, 2005)
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 6
1. Gmez, J.C. and Baeyens, E.. Subspace Identification of
Multivariable Hammerstein and Wiener Models, European
Journal of Control, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2005.
2. Gmez, J.C., Jutan, A. and Baeyens, E.. Wiener Model
Identification and Predictive Control of a pH NeutralizationProcess.IEE Proceedings on Control Theory and Applications,
Vol. 151, No. 3, pp. 329-338, May 2004.
References
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
4/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 7
Subspace State-Space System IDentificationSSubspaceubspace SStatetate--SSpacepace SSystemystem IDIDentificationentification
They combine tools ofSystem TheorySystem Theory, Numerical Linear AlgebraNumerical Linear Algebra
and GeometryGeometry (projections).
They have their origin in Realization TheoryRealization Theory as developed in the
60/70s (Ho & Kalman, 1966).
They provide reliable state-space models ofmultivariablemultivariable LTI
systems directlydirectly from input-output data.
They dont require iterative optimization procedures no problems
with local minima, convergence and initialization.
4SID Methods4SID Methods
PropertiesProperties
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 8
They dont require a particular (canonical) state-space realization
numerical conditioning improves.
They require a modest computational load in comparison to tradi-
tional identification methods like PEM.
The algorithms can be (they have been) efficiently implemented in
software like MatlabMatlab.
Main computational tools are QR and SVD.
All subspace methods compute at some stage the subspacesubspace spanned
by the columns of the extended observability matrix.
The various algorithms (e.g., N4SID, MOESP, CVA) differ in the
way the extended observability matrix is estimated and also in the way
it is used to compute the system matrices.
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
5/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 9
The system modelThe system model
kkkk
kkkk
eDuCxy
KeBuAxx
++=
++=+1 StateState--space model inspace model ininnovation forminnovation form
The identification problemThe identification problem
To estimate the system matrices (A, B, C, D) and K, and the model
order n, from an (N+-1)-point data set of input and output
measurements
{ } 11
,+
=
N
kkkyu
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 10
RealizationRealization--based 4SID Methodsbased 4SID Methods
=
=0l
ll kk uhy
>
==
0,
0,1 l
lll BCA
Dh
For a LTI system, a minimalminimal state-space realization (A, B, C, D)
completely defines the input-output properties of the system through
where the impulse response coefficients are related to the system
matrices by
convolution sumconvolution sum
lh
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
6/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 11
=
++
+
11
132
21
jiii
j
j
ij
hhh
hhh
hhh
H
L
MOMM
L
L
Impulse ResponseImpulse Response
HankelHankel MatrixMatrix
jiijH C=
An estimate of the extended observability matrix can be computed by a
full rankfull rankfactorization of the impulse response Hankel matrix. Thisfactorization is provided by the SVD of matrix Hij.
ExtendedExtended
ObservabilityObservability
MatrixMatrix
((i>n)i>n)
ExtendedExtended
ControlabilityControlability
MatrixMatrix
(j>n)(j>n)
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 12
[ ]4342143421
ji
TT
T
T
ij VUVUV
VUUH
C
12
1
1
21
11111
2
1
2
1
210
0
=
=
In the absence of noise, Hij will be a rankn matrix, and 1 will contain
the n non-zero singular values model order is computed.model order is computed. In thepresence of noise, Hij will have full rank and a rank reduction stage will
be required for the model order determination.
rank reductionrank reduction
Problems:Problems: it is necessary to measure or to estimate (for example, via
correlation analysis) the impulse response of the system not goodnot good
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
7/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 13
Direct 4SID MethodsDirect 4SID Methods
NUXY ++= H
=
+
+
11
132
21
N
N
N
yyy
yyyyyy
L
MMMM
LL
Y
Output blockOutput blockHankelHankel matrixmatrix
(In a similar way are defined the
Input block Hankel matrix U
and
the Noise block Hankel matrix N.)
=
1
CA
CA
C
MExtendedExtended ( > n)
ObservabilityObservability MatrixMatrix
[ ]Nxxx ,,, 21 L=X
State Sequence MatrixState Sequence Matrix
(1)fundamental equationfundamental equation
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 14
=
DBCABCABCA
DCBCAB
DCB
D
H
L
MOMMM
L
L
L
432
0
00
000
Lower triangular blockLower triangular block
ToeplitzToeplitz matrix of impulsematrix of impulse
responsesresponses (unknown).
The main idea of Direct 4SID methodsThe main idea of Direct 4SID methodsIn the absence of noise (N
= 0), eq. (1) becomes
and the part of the output which does not emanate from the state can
be removed by multiplying (from the right) both sides of eq. (2) by the
orthogonal projection onto the null space of U, i.e.by
UXY H+= (2)
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
8/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 15
( ) ==
UUUUUU
1TTIT orthogonal projectionorthogonal projection
I=
UU
This yields
=
XUUY
NoteNote that the matrix on the left depends exclusively on the input-output
data. Then, a full rank factorizationfull rank factorization of this matrix will provide an
estimate of the extended observability matrix. Estimates of the
corresponding system matrices can be obtained by resorting to the shiftshift
invariance propertyinvariance property of the extended observability matrix, and by solving
a system of linear equations in the least squares sense.
(3)
such that
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 16
The factorization is provided by the SVD of the matrix on the left side
[ ]
=
=
TT
T
T
VUVUV
VUU 1
21
1
21
11111
2
1
2
1
210
0
43421
UY
rank reductionrank reduction
(model order estimation)(model order estimation)
(In the absence of noise 2 = 0)
Weighting MatricesWeighting Matrices
Row and column weighting matrices can be introduced in (4) before
performing the SVD of the matrix in the left hand side. Any choice of
positive-definite weighting matrices Wr and Wc will result in consistent
estimates of the extended observability matrix.
(4)
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
9/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 17
[ ]
=
=
TT
T
T
cr VUVUV
VUUWW 1
21
1
21
11111
2
1
2
1
210
0
43421
UY
change of coordinates in statechange of coordinates in state--spacespace
Existing algorithms employ the following choices for matrices Wrand Wc,
MOESP (Verhaegen, 1994):
CVA (Larimore, 1990):
N4SID (Van Overschee and de Moor, 1994):
== TT U
T
Ucr NWIW
11
,
21
21
1,
1
=
= T
Uc
T
Ur TT NW
NW
YY
==
11
, TUcr TN
WIW
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 18
Computation of the system matricesComputation of the system matrices
Given an estimate of the extended observability matrix, estimates
of the system matrices can be computed as:
: first row block of
: solving in the least squares sense
C
A
A
= shiftshift--invariance propertyinvariance property
solving a system of linear equations:and DB
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
10/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 19
In the presence of noise
NUXY ++= H
+=
UNXUYand
noise term needs to benoise term needs to be
removedremoved
The noise term can be removed by correlating it awaycorrelating it away with a suitable
matrix. This can be interpreted as an oblique projection.oblique projection.
Presence of noisePresence of noise
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 20
Block-oriented Nonlinear ModelsBlockBlock--oriented Nonlinear Modelsoriented Nonlinear Models
Fig. 4: Hammerstein-Wiener Model (LNL)
yk
StaticNonlinearityLTI System LTI System
uk
Fig. 2: Wiener Model (LN)
LTI System
yk
uk
StaticNonlinearity
Fig. 3: Hammerstein-Wiener Model (NLN)
StaticNonlinearity LTI System
yk
uk
StaticNonlinearity
LTI SystemStatic
Nonlinearityykuk
Fig. 1: Hammerstein Model (NL)
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
11/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 21
Hammerstein Model IdentificationHammerstein Model IdentificationHammerstein Model Identification
Nonlinear subsystemNonlinear subsystem
mk
nk
pnk
mk vxy
,
,, k
( ) ( )=
==r
i
kiikk uguNv
1
( ) ( )rig ppi ,,1,: L=
Problem FormulationProblem FormulationProblem Formulation
k
N(.)DC
BA ykuk
k
vk
Fig. 5: Hammerstein model
++=
++=+
kkkk
kkkk
DvCxy
BvAxx
1
LTILTI subsystemsubsystem
known basis
functions
unknown matrix
parameters
(1)
(2)
(3)
( )rippi ,,1 L=
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 22
Identification problem: to estimate the unknown parameter matrices
, and A, B, C, and D characterizing the nonlinear and the linear
parts, respectively, and the model ordern, from an N-point data set of
observed input-output measurements.
Identification problemIdentification problem:: to estimate the unknown parameter matrices
, and A, B, C, and D characterizing the nonlinear and the linear
parts, respectively, and the model ordern, from an N-point data set of
observed input-output measurements.
( )rippi ,,1, L=
{ }Nkkk
yu1
, =
Subspace Identification AlgorithmSubspace Identification AlgorithmSubspace Identification Algorithm
( )
( )
++=
++=
=
=
+
k
r
i
kiikk
k
r
i
kiikk
ugDCxy
ugBAxx
1
1
1
(3) (1), (2)
Identifiabilityproblem
NormalizationNormalization 12=i
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
12/24
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
13/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 25
Let have ranks>p, and let its economy size SVD be
partitioned as
rpmn
BD
+ )(
[ ]
===
=T
Ts
i
T
iii
T
BD V
V
UUvuVU 2
1
2
1
211 0
0
with .( )pprppmn VU ,,,diagand,, 2111)(1 L= +
Then
( ),,argmin,
111
2
2,,
VUD
B
D
B TBD
DB
=
=
and the approximation error is given by
.
2
1
2
2
+=
p
T
BDD
B
(4)
Result 1ResultResult 11
Normalizationin provided by
the SVD
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 26
Identification AlgorithmIdentification AlgorithmIdentification Algorithm
The subspace algorithm can be summarized as follows.
StepStep 1:1: Compute estimates of the system matrices , and the
model ordern, using any available (linear) subspace algorithm, such as
N4SID, MOESP, CVA.
StepStep 2:2: Based on the estimates compute an estimate of matrix .
StepStep 3:3: Compute the SVD of and its partition as in (4).
StepStep 4:4: Compute the estimates of the parameter matricesB, D, and as
BDBD
respectively.
( )DCBA ~,,~,
DB~
and~
BD
1
11
V
UD
B
=
=
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
14/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 27
Result 2: Consistency AnalysisResultResult 2:2: Consistency AnalysisConsistency Analysis
N
Under some assumptions on persistency of excitationpersistency of excitation of the inputs, which
depend on the particular subspace method used in StepStep 11 of the algorithm,
the estimates are consistentconsistent in the sense that they converge
to the true values when the number of data points .
The consistency of , implies that of B, D, and .
DCBA ~,,~,
DB~
and~
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 28
Wiener Model IdentificationWiener Model IdentificationWiener Model Identification
Nonlinear subsystemNonlinear subsystem
m
k
n
k
mnk
pk vxu
,
,, k
( ) ( )=
==r
i
kiikk ygyNv1
1
( ) ( )rig mm
i,,1,: L=
Problem FormulationProblem FormulationProblem Formulation
k
N(.)DCBA
ykuk
k
vk
Fig. 7: Wiener model
++=
++=+
kkkk
kkkk
DuCxv
BuAxx
1
LTILTI subsystemsubsystem
known basisfunctions
unknown matrixparameters
(5)
(6)
(7)
( )rimmi ,,1 L=
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
15/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 29
Identification problem: to estimate the unknown parameter matrices
, and A, B, C, and D characterizing the nonlinear and the
linear parts, respectively, and the model ordern, from an N-point data set
of observed input-output measurements.
Identification problemIdentification problem:: to estimate the unknown parameter matrices
, and A, B, C, and D characterizing the nonlinear and the
linear parts, respectively, and the model ordern, from an N-point data set
of observed input-output measurements.
( )rimmi ,,1, L=
{ }Nkkk
yu1
, =
Subspace Identification AlgorithmSubspace Identification AlgorithmSubspace Identification Algorithm
( )
++==
++=
=
+
kkk
r
i
kiik
kkkk
DuCxygY
BuAxx
1
1
(7) (6)
NormalizationNormalization 12=+
[ ] ( ) ( )[ ]TkTrkTkr ygygY ,,,,, 11 LL ==
++=
++=+
kkkk
kkkk
uDxCY
BuAxx
~~~1
DDCC +
+
== ~
,~
Identifiabilityproblem
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 30
k
DC
BA~~
Ykuk
k
Fig. 8: Equivalent LTI model
with output Yk
++=
++=+
kkkk
kkkk
uDxCY
BuAxx
~~~1
LinearLinear Subspace AlgorithmsSubspace Algorithms
(N4SID, MOESP,CVA)
EstimatesEstimates nDCBA ordermodel,~
,~
,,
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
16/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 31
The problemproblem is how to compute estimates of matrices C, D, and +
from the estimates of the matrices~
and,~
DC
+
and,
,
DC
( ) [ ]
= ++
+
2
2,,
~~argmin,, DCDCDC
DC
The solutionsolution to this optimization problem is provided by the SVD of
the matrix
Similarly to what was done for the Hammerstein model the closest, in the
2-norm sense, estimates are such that
DC
~~
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 32
Let have ranks>m, and let its economy size SVD
be partitioned as
)(~~ pnmrDC +
[ ]
===
=T
Ts
i
T
iii
T
V
VUUvuVUDC
2
1
2
1
21
1 0
0~~
with .( )mmpnmmr VU ,,,diagand,, 211
)(
11 L=+
Then
[ ]( ) [ ] ( ),,~~argmin, 1112
2,,
T
DC
VUDCDCDC =
= ++
+
and the approximation error is given by
[ ] .~~2
1
2
2
++ =
mDCDC
(8)
Result 3ResultResult 33
Normalization
in + provided
by the SVD
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
17/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 33
Identification AlgorithmIdentification AlgorithmIdentification Algorithm
The subspace algorithm can be summarized as follows.
StepStep 1:1: Compute estimates of the system matrices , and the
model ordern, using any available (linear) subspace algorithm, such as
N4SID, MOESP, CVA.StepStep 2:2: Compute the SVD of and its partition as in (8).
StepStep 3:3: Compute the estimates of the parameter matrices C, D, and + as
respectively.
( )DCBA ~,~,,
DC
~~
[ ]+=
=
1
11
U
VDC T
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 34
Simulation ExamplesSimulation ExamplesSimulation Examples
The True SystemThe True System
002.015.09.0
5.17.0)(
23
2
+++
+=
zzz
zzzG
linear subsystem
( ) 432 0263.05113.00149.08589.0 kkkkk uuuuuN += nonlinear subsystem
The input and noiseThe input and noise
input
( )( )
cos4.02.11064.0
8
=
Spectrum of the zero
mean coloured noise
Example 1: Hammerstein Model ID (academic)ExampleExample 1:1: Hammerstein ModelHammerstein Model ID (ID (academicacademic))
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) k
k
kk
kku
+++
++=
0035.0sin1.00025.0sin3.0
0015.0sin5.00005.0sin
( white noise withvariance )
k610
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
18/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 35
The Estimated Nonlinear SubsystemThe Estimated Nonlinear Subsystem
( ) 432 0260.05113.00142.08589.0 kkkkk uuuuuN += Estimated nonlinear subsystem
Fig.9: True (blue) and Estimated (green)
nonlinear characteristic.
The EstimatedThe Estimated LinearLinear SubsystemSubsystem
( )0014.01495.09002.0
4984.16997.09986.023
2
+++
+=
zzz
zzzG Estimated linear subsystem
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 36
Validation resultsValidation results
Fig. 10: True (green) and Estimated (blue) Output.
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
19/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 37
Example 2: Hammerstein Model ID (Binary Distillation Column)ExampleExample 2:2: Hammerstein ModelHammerstein Model ID (ID (Binary Distillation ColumnBinary Distillation Column))
Fig. 11: Schematic representation of thedistillation column
(Weischedel & McAvoy, 1980)
InputInput:: reflux ratio (u)
OutputsOutputs:: overhead flow rate (y1)
overhead methanol concentration (y2)
bottom flow rate (y3)
bottom methanol concentration (y4)
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 38
Fig. 12: Left Plot: Estimation (first 1000 points), and validation (remaining1000 points) Input Data. Right Plot: Estimation (first 1000 points) and
Validation (remaining 1000 points) Output Data.
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
20/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 39
Fig. 13: True (blue) and Estimated (red) Outputs (validation data)
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 40
The EstimatedThe Estimated LinearLinear SubsystemSubsystem
Third order model with eigenvalues at { }9726.0,9557.0,4916.0
The Estimated Nonlinear SubsystemThe Estimated Nonlinear Subsystem
Third order polynomial
Fig. 14: Estimated Nonlinear
Characteristic
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
21/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 41
Example 3: Wiener Model ID (pH Neutralization Process)ExampleExample 3:3: Wiener ModelWiener Model ID (ID (pH Neutralization ProcesspH Neutralization Process))
Fig. 15: Schematic representation of the pHNeutralization Process
(Henson & Seborg, 92, 94, 97)
base:base: NaOH acid:acid: HNO3
buffer:buffer:NaHCO3
effluent solution
Manipulated variable:Manipulated variable: base
flow rate (u1)
Disturbances:Disturbances:buffer flow rate
(u2) and acid flow rate (u3)
Output:Output: pH of the effluent
solution (y)
(u3)
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 42
Simulation ModelSimulation Modelbased on first principlesfirst principles (introducing two reaction
invariants for each inlet stream)
0),(
)()()( 21
=
++=
yxh
uxpuxgxfx&
[ ] [ ]
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
21
2
10101
10211010),(
1,
1)(
1,
1)(
,)(
,,
2
14
1
2212
2111
233
133
21
pKyypK
pKyyy
T
ba
T
ba
T
ba
Tba
T
xxyxh
xWV
xWV
xp
xWV
xWV
xg
xWV
uxW
V
uxf
WWxxx
++
+++=
=
=
=
==where
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
22/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 43
Fig. 16: Estimation (first 1000 points) and validation
(remaining 600 points) input-output data.
Estimation and Validation dataEstimation and Validation data
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 44
The EstimatedThe Estimated LinearLinear SubsystemSubsystem
Third order model ( )9474.08940.29466.2
006.00122.00062.023
2
+
+=
zzz
zzzG
Third order polynomial
kkkk yyyyN 9989.00358.00319.0)( 231 ++=
The Estimated Nonlinear SubsystemThe Estimated Nonlinear Subsystem
Fig. 17: Estimated Nonlinear Characteristic.
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
23/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 45
Validation resultsValidation results
Fig. 18: True (blue) and estimated (red) Output (Estimation/Validation data).
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 46
ConclusionsConclusionsConclusions
New subspace methods for the simultaneous identification of thelinear and nonlinear parts of multivariable Hammerstein andmultivariable Hammerstein andWiener modelsWiener models have been presented.
The proposed methods make use of a standard (linear) subspacemethod followed by a 2-norm minimization problem which is
solved via an SVD. The proposed methods generalizegeneralize all the families of linear
subspace methods to this class of nonlinear models.
The method provides consistent estimatesconsistent estimates under the sameconditions on persistency of excitation required by the (linear)subspace method used as the first step of the algorithm.
The estimated models are in a format which is suitable for theiruse in standard (linear) Model Predictive Control schemes.
-
8/6/2019 Seminar LSD 2005 Bw
24/24
LSD - September 2005 J.C. Gmez 47
Subspace Identification of
Hammerstein and Wiener Models
Subspace Identification ofSubspace Identification of
Hammerstein and Wiener ModelsHammerstein and Wiener Models
Speaker
Juan C. Gmez
Laboratory for System Dynamics and Signal ProcessingFCEIA, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
ARGENTINA
jcgomez@fceia.unr.edu.ar
Research SeminarResearch Seminar
top related