secondary assessment and the nceas€¦ · exemplification. supporting documents • assessment...

Post on 03-Aug-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Secondary Assessment and theNCEAs

2011

Changes to Setting and Marking –Why?

• Continuous improvement

• Research based

• Monitored by external experts

Basis of the changes

• Test Dimensionality

• Item characteristics

• Candidate characteristics

Item response curves

Grade thresholds

DIF (differential item functioning)

• Provides information about whether candidates

perform differently based on their particular

demographic.

• Example 1. Males/females in particular question

• Example 2. Asian/non-Asian in particular question

How we use the Information?

Assessment Principles

• Discuss and identify the key principles for all

assessment with those around you

• Write down six adjectives that describe good

assessment which would be used as part of the

assessment principles

Assessment Principles

Assessment must be:

• Appropriate

• Fair and inclusive.

Evidence gathered must be:

• Valid

• Sufficient.

Assessor judgements must be:

• Consistent

• Transparent.

We ask examiners to Include(where relevant to the task)…

• Content accessible to all

• Content that is interesting and relevant

• Tasks that encourage response from a diverse

perspective

• Gender neutral titles and names

• Gender balance.

We ask them to Avoid (unless pertinent to the standard) …

• Controversial issues, people or events

• Topics which may upset

• Stereotypical pictures, cartoons and resources

• Tokenism.

Achievement

standard(criteria and

explanatory notes)

Assessment

schedule(evidence/

judgement

statements)

Assessment

task(the means of

collecting valid

evidence)

Analysis of the standard

• Criteria – determine the difference between each level of performance

• Explanatory notes – identify any restrictions, explanations or specifics

• Curriculum – may provide further clarification or exemplification

Supporting Documents

• Assessment Specifications

• Exemplars

• Assessment reports

• Curriculum

Developing questions

• Verb + Subject + Condition

• Verb must signal clearly what is required and be

consistent with criteria and explanatory notes in

the standard

• Subject must be appropriate to the curriculum,

criteria and explanatory notes

• Condition must be appropriate to the curriculum,

criteria and explanatory notes

• Students must have sufficient opportunity to

achieve at every level.

The Assessment Schedule…

• Designed to achieve consistency of assessor

judgements

• Developed at the same time as the assessment

activity

• Provides examples of expected student evidence

• Specifies minimal requirements for achievement

at each level (quality and quantity).

Quality Check

Check for:

• Excess or areas of deficiency

• Validity – against the standard – use standard

itself

• Level of difficulty

• Time for students to complete task

• Clarity of instructions

• Consistency

• Error-free.

Traps and pitfalls - check…

• All resources are appropriate, clear and accessible.

• Labels and tables – instructions match.

• Diagrams – do they work?

• General accuracy – languages: accents and

characters / history: dates and periods.

• Pictures / images – relevant, good quality.

• Genre/context of task and standard match

• Task numbering is consistent.

• Key words bolded.

Research has affected question structure

• All questions now provide evidence for all levels of

achievement

• Most questions now have scaffolding

What is scaffolding?

• Providing the support (footholds) that enable more

students to demonstrate evidence of higher

performance levels.

• Questions that are scaffolded:

– elicit better responses from students

– have more students attempting the more

challenging parts of questions.

• Some form of scaffolding should be provided for all

questions.

Scaffolding in ChemistryConsider the development of the following question:

• Version 1:

Discuss the different states of fluorine and bromine at room temperature.

• Version 2:

Fluorine, F2, is a gas and bromine, Br2, is a liquid at room temperature. Discuss the different states of these elements at room temperature.

• Version 3:

Fluorine, F2, is a gas and bromine, Br2, is a liquid at room temperature. Discuss the different states of these elements at room temperature. You should include in your answer information on particle separation, energy, particle motion and the attractive forces between the particles.

And finally

• Version 4:

Fluorine, F2, is a gas and bromine, Br2, is a liquid at room temperature.

Discuss the reasons for the different states of these elements at room temperature. You should include in your answer:

• information on particle separation

• energy

• particle motion

• the attractive forces between the particles.

How research supports these changes

How research supports these changes

Biology Level 3 2006 Question Three

Many metabolic pathways are controlled by multiple

genes. An example is the metabolic pathway that

produces normal skin pigmentation. Albinism, which is

the total lack of pigment, can be caused by a mutation in

any one of the genes controlling this pathway.

(e)Discuss the fact that it

is possible for two albino

parents to have a child with

normal skin pigmentation.

BIOLOGY LEVEL 3 2007 QUESTION 3 (C)

ON THE SAME CONCEPT

The same concept again in 2009

The 2007 question The 2009 question

Monitoring

marking

Profiles of expected performance

• PEPs are:

• indicators of ranges of expected results for external

standards

• tolerances developed on the basis of professional

judgement of National Assessment Facilitators (NAFs)

in the Secondary Examinations team, NZQA

statistical/research staff, Subject experts

• tools to ensure results that are consistent with the

achievement standards.

Why are they used?

PEPs were introduced as a result of the 2005 State

Services Commission report into NCEA and New

Zealand Scholarship.

The report addressed concerns about the excessive

variability shown in consecutive years of NCEA

results in some standards. Such variability is not

acceptable in national examinations where cohorts

are large.

The NZQA Board adopted the recommendation that

a range of expected results should be established to

give guidance to examiners and markers.

Do they ever change?

PEPs are:

• set afresh each year

• affected by changes in the registered standards

• affected by changes in cohort performance

• guidelines which can and are broken with justification.

Grade Score Marking (GSM)

Research

1. Item response theory (IRT) 2006-2009

2. Score based grading 2007-2009

3. Live Pilot 2010

Outcomes: the NZQA perspectives

• National Assessment Facilitators had increased

confidence in signing off marking schedules

• Tracking of results during marking was straightforward

• All data procedures post marking were business-as-

usual.

Outcomes: the marker perspectives

• Cut score setting enhanced Panel Leaders’ (PLs’)

confidence that grade boundaries reflected standards

• Markers liked the refinement of being able to indicate

high/low performance within each grade

• PLs thought that discrimination was better at

boundaries.

Projected benefits

• Greater accuracy in grade determination

• Fairer to students

• Reduction in year-by-year variability leading to

diminished need for PEPs longer term

• More transparency

• Closer alignment of marking to the standard

Grade Score Marking – what is it?

• Grades are assigned according to the criteria in the

standard

• Each grade is divided into 2; there is also a zero Ø

• Each question receives a grade and score

• The scores are totalled

• A sample of papers on each score is judged by the

panel leader and check marker to set the boundaries

for each grade

• The boundaries are called cut scores and become

the sufficiency statements for the grades.

Scoring each question with GSM

N A M E

NØ N1 N 2 A3 A4 M5 M6 E7 E8

GSM Assessment schedules

• Schedules are based on the criteria in the standard for

A, M and E

• N is below A

• There is an NØ for ‘no response; no relevant evidence’

• Each grade, NAME, is divided into two.

Total score

The scores for the questions are aggregated to give a

total score for the paper.

The total score represents the sum of the grades for the

questions.

What is a cut score?

A cut score sets the grade boundaries by establishing the

range for each grade.

Senior markers use the actual student exam papers to

set cut scores to define each NAME grade.

Results

• Markers write only the total score on the front of the

paper

• Markers enter only the total score online

• The cut-score is entered by the NAF after consultation

with the senior markers and other NZQA staff

• The correct result grade will be generated

automatically.

Results to candidates

• The record of achievement will show only the grade N,

A, M, E.

• The judgement statement on the web will show the cut

scores for the various grades.

• When candidates receive their booklets back they will

also receive an information sheet telling them where to

go on the web to check their grades.

Questions

• What do students need to know to sit the exam?

• How are teaching programmes affected?

• Is this a move away from standards based

assessment ?

• What is the difference between this and using marks?

• Can GSM be used for internal marking (either for

internal assessment or mock exams)?

Jennifer Mackrell and Christine Pallin

Team Leaders - National Assessment Facilitators

Secondary Examinations

NZQA

PO Box 160

Wellington 6140.

Contact emails:

Jennifer.mackrell@nzqa.govt.nz

Christine.pallin@nzqa.govt.nz

top related