science communication natalie rowley & john wilkie, school of chemistry hea stem conference, 12...
Post on 28-Mar-2015
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Science Communication
Natalie Rowley & John Wilkie, School of ChemistryHEA STEM Conference, 12 April 2012
Contents
HEA UK Physical Sciences Subject Centre Graduate Chemists Skills Report
Science Communication and the Media module
Evaluation Acknowledgements
HEA UK Physical Sciences Centre: Skills Required by New Chemistry Graduates
Hanson and Overton, 2010
Chemical terminologyFundamental chemical principlesPrinciples of thermodynamicsKinetics of chemical changeInorganic compounds and reactionsOrganic compounds and reactionsAnalytical techniques
Safe handling of chemical materialsManipulative practical skillsSkills with chemical instrumentationPlanning and design of experimentsInterpretation of experimental data
Numeracy and computational skillsReport writing skillsOral presentation skillsInformation retrieval skillsProblem-solving skillsTeam-working skillsTime management/organisationalIndependent learning ability
Development Deficit:
1. Time Management
2. Oral Presentation
3. Team-Working
4. Information Retrieval
5. Numeracy and Computational Skills
6. Independent Learning Ability
7. Problem Solving
Aims to develop the ability of students to
communicate complex scientific ideas to a lay audience
to enable the students to develop their team working skills
to enhance specific areas of scientific understanding through cooperative, enquiry-based learning and research-informed teaching
Science Communication and the Media
Plenary (1h)
Taster Sessions (8 x 15 mins)
4 Workshops (ca. 3h)– Interim feedback session (30 mins)
2 Lectures (1h)
Festival of Science (3h)
Plenary: “Communicating Chemistry”
Dr Stuart Cantrill (Alumnus and Chief Editor, Nature Chemistry)
Taster Sessions: School of Chemistry
Dr Paul Anderson “The Chemical Storage of Hydrogen”
Prof Jon Preece “Nanoscale Chemistry” Dr Peter Slater “Fuel Cells for Local Power
Generation” Dr Jim Tucker “Fluorescent Sensors for
DNA”
Taster Sessions: “Birmingham Heroes”
Dr Elizabeth Blackburn “Solids and Supersolids”
Dr Ulrich Günther “New Diagnostic Opportunities Arising From Cancer Metabolomics”
Prof Richard Palmer “Organising Atoms” Dr Gary Thorpe “Novel Chemiluminescent
Reactions for Clinical Analytical Applications”
Workshops (ca. 3h) “Introduction to Filming Videos”
“Evaluating Videos”
“Introduction to Video Editing”
“Writing and Evaluating Press Releases”
Lectures (1h):
“Information Retrieval and Getting Your Message Across”
“Producing Web Pages, Press Releases, Referencing and Plagiarism”
Assessment:
5 Minute Video (group) 50%– Student-derived criteria
Website (group) 30%
Press Release (individual) 20%– Student-derived criteria
(Peer Assessment)
Evaluation:
Internal: Module evaluation
External: Peter Hartley, Bradford (NTF and Professor of
Education Development)
Module Evaluation
Students were evaluated based on their response to Likert-style questions and open-ended questions before and after the module
Changes in student’s attitudes / perceived confidence were analysed
Tracked Changes in Attitudes / Perceived Confidence (N 18): 1. I would be able to promote my skills in an
interview (+8, -3, same 6)
2. I am confident I can explain complex scientific ideas to non-scientists (+7, -1, same 9)
3. I feel able to present myself with confidence (+7, -2, same 9)
4. I feel confident working in a group (+6, -1, same 11)
5. I am confident in my communication skills (+5, -3, same 9)
6. I am confident in tacking unfamiliar problems (+4, -2, same 12)
7. I am able to take responsibility for my own learning (+4, -3, same 10)
8. I enjoy working as a member of a team (+4, -5, same 8)
9. I can demonstrate the ability to solve problems (+2, -5, same 9)
10. I can identify examples of how reflection has improved my previous performance (+2, -5, same 8)
Examples of Positive Feedback:
“Have never been on film before, the whole experience has been unfamiliar yet exciting”
“Overcame personal differences to work well in a team”
“Learning to work efficiently with others and identify key skills of the individuals of the group”
“This module has shown that I can easily simplify things”
Feedback from External Evaluator: Not all students were convinced of value to the course
More Chemistry topics are needed
Some students felt that their satisfaction directly related to their group experience
Perceived module as rather “isolated”
Module was interesting and “fun”
Additional skills and insights which help with employability, career choice and job interviews
“Better understanding of the scientific process”
“Better understanding of communication”
Changes in Light of Feedback
All references to the word “media” have been removed
The module has been contextualised from the outset, both in terms of employability skills developed and its position within the curriculum
All of the taster sessions were delivered by colleagues from School of Chemistry
The filming and editing workshops have been combined to reduce the student focus on technology
The number of lectures has increased to allow emphasis of the communication skills being developed
The website component of assessment has been replaced by individual scientific summaries to enable further practice at written communication
Latest Module Evaluation
Changes in student’s attitudes / perceived confidence have been analysed
Tracked Changes in Attitudes / Perceived Confidence (N 41):1. I am confident in my communication skills
(+25, -4, same 12) [5]
2. I feel able to present myself with confidence (+24, -4, same 13) [3]
3. I am confident I can explain complex scientific ideas to non-scientists (+18, -9, same 14) [2]
4. I can demonstrate the ability to solve problems (+17, -5, same 19) [9]
5. I can identify examples of how reflection has improved my previous performance (+15, -5, same 19) [10]
6. I would be able to promote my skills in an interview (+14, -4, same 22) [1]
7. I feel confident working in a group (+13, -6, same 22) [4]
8. I enjoy working as a member of a team (+12, -5, same 24) [8]
9. I am confident in tacking unfamiliar problems (+12, -5, same 24) [6]
10. I am able to take responsibility for my own learning (+7, -8, same 26) [7]
Further Funding from National HE STEM
Custodian for practice transfer adoption of this module
Running workshops to train colleagues from other Institutions
Acknowledgements School of Chemistry:
– Dr Paul Anderson– Dr Melanie Britton– Dr Liam Cox– Dr John Fossey– Dr Anna Peacock– Prof Jon Preece– Prof Peter Slater– Dr John Snaith– Prof Richard Tuckett– Dr Jim Tucker
National HE STEM School of Chemistry School of Biosciences UoB Alumni fund
School of Biosciences– Dr Jerry Pritchard– Dr Julia Lodge
School of Physics– Dr Elizabeth Blackburn– Prof Richard Palmer
School of Cancer Studies– Dr Ulrich Günther
Dr Gary Thorpe– (WMCHI&E)
Prof Peter Hartley– (Bradford)
Dr Stuart Cantrill– (Nature Chemistry)
Steve Hull & Stephen Gray– JISC Digital
top related